Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Today, the Gov's new Immigration System Reforms begin. But let's not forget who got us into this mess: Priti Patel & the Tories. There used to be an annual cap of 20,700 non-EU 'skilled' work visas. But Patel REMOVED this cap in her 'post-Brexit points-based system’, starting Jan 2021....

33,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING: COVER UP Dept of State Scandal : The Department of State (DoS) issued 8 million non- immigrant visas to foreigners seeking entry into the United States on a “temporary” basis for tourism, medical treatment, business, temporary work, study, or other reasons. According to Dept of State, from calendar years 2020 through 2023, DOS granted non-immigrant visas to approximately 8 MILLION foreigners WITHOUT conducting IN PERSON consular interviews. Dept of State also did NOT collect fingerprints/Biometrics for an unknown number of visas during the same period. In December 2023, DOS and DHS agreed to EXPAND the categories of visas and applicants whose consular interviews could be waived beginning on January 1, 2024. In March 2024, Dos began providing DHS and CBP with information on visa holders who did NOT receive interviews. The cover up is the fact that the original 25 page DHS Office of Inspector General report that was published June 2024 has now been scrubbed to only 16 pages. Why was the original 25 page report reduced to 16 pages?? Below are some of the data images that has been scrubbed. Conclusion: The Biden admin allowed approx 8 million foreigners to enter the country WITHOUT proper inspection, fingerprinting and in person interviews !!! This is a national security risk that WILL come back and put American citizens in harms way. It’s just a matter of time. Please share this post. DHS Office of Inspector General DHS OIG Report link:

hernando arce

72,927 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

‼️ "People from the East are flocking to Belarus": Lukashenka threatens the EU with a new hybrid war Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenka, speaking today in a church for Orthodox Christmas, once again turned to threats against EU countries. This time, he began to threaten the EU countries bordering Belarus with a new proxy war using migrants as weapons. Lukashenka claimed that "people from the East are starting to flock to Belarus." He complained about their "incompetence" and "lack of professional skills," adding that "uncontrolled migration is a disaster" for Belarus. Belarusian dictator literally admitted that Belarus is the main transit route for migrants heading to Western Europe: "There is a huge transit through us to the West, where [migrants] are trying to get to," accusing the EU of blaming it for the flow of refugees. "We will not protect anyone from migrants. Especially those who impose economic sanctions on us. Why should we protect them?" said Lukashenka. Belarusian regime is once again using migrants as a weapon against Europe, showing complete disregard for human lives. This hybrid war started in 2021 when the regime orchestrated a migration crisis on Poland's border. Thousands of refugees from Africa and the Middle East attempted to cross into Poland, often with the help of Belarusian security forces, who facilitated fence-breaking and clashes with Polish border guards. Lukashenka's bloody games cost many migrants their lives. Hundreds froze to death or starved in the forests, while thousands were injured trying to climb over border fences. According to Polish authorities, around 15,000 migrants were present in Belarus in November 2021, with 2,000 to 4,000 stranded directly at the border. Last year, the Polish Sejm significantly expanded the powers of border guards, military and police officers in the fight against illegal migration. According to the new law, law enforcement officers are allowed to use live ammunition to prevent migrants from attempting to cross the border illegally. Video: Belarus-Poland border, November 2021.

NEXTA

707,354 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

2025: Elon Musk wants the European Union to be abolished 2016: That time David Cameron reminded us of the benefits of being in the EU, including the special op-out status the UK once had Comparing US states to EU countries works as a shorthand: both are smaller entities in a larger union, but unlike US states, EU countries keep their full sovereignty - here are some examples: ❌U S states gave up sovereignty to form a union ✅ EU countries keep their sovereignty 🆘 Abolishing the EU isn’t breaking up a federation, it’s attacking national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t have separate militaries ✅ EU countries maintain their own armies 🆘 Dismantling the EU wouldn’t "free states" it would undermine national sovereignty ❌ US states follow one federal constitution ✅ EU countries retain their own constitutions 🆘 Ending the EU would ignore the sovereignty each nation has carefully preserved ❌ US states can’t sign international treaties ✅ EU countries sign treaties individually and collectively 🆘 Abolishing the EU attacks their sovereignty on both national and international levels ❌ US states can’t control borders ✅ EU countries control who enters their territory 🆘 Destroying the EU would remove their border sovereignty ❌ US states rely on one federal currency ✅ EU countries, like those outside the eurozone, can keep their own money 🆘 Abolishing the EU would compromise financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t impose independent foreign policy ✅ EU countries have independent foreign policies 🆘 Ending the EU doesn’t restore "freedom" it erodes national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t set nationwide defense policies ✅ EU countries maintain sovereignty over defence and security 🆘 Dismantling the EU threatens each nation’s sovereign decisions ❌ US states can’t maintain unique laws on education, healthcare, taxes ✅ EU countries make their own laws 🆘 Abolishing the EU ignores the sovereignty in domestic governance ❌ US states cannot leave the US ✅ EU countries can theoretically leave the union (like Brexit) 🆘 Attacking the EU’s existence is an attack on countries’ sovereign choice ❌ US states rely entirely on federal law enforcement ✅ EU countries maintain their own police and justice systems 🆘 Abolishing the EU would undermine their sovereign law enforcement ❌ US states cannot print passports or control visas ✅ EU countries issue their own passports and control immigration 🆘 Ending the EU would infringe on national sovereignty over borders ❌ US states cannot veto federal treaties ✅ EU countries vote on treaties and agreements individually 🆘 Abolishing the EU would strip countries of treaty sovereignty ❌ US states share a single central bank ✅ EU countries can keep or choose their own currencies 🆘 Destroying the EU would attack financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t run independent foreign aid programs ✅ EU countries manage foreign aid and international development 🆘 Abolishing the EU would erode sovereign control over foreign policy ❌ US states cannot maintain their own national holidays or symbols officially ✅ EU countries preserve national symbols, holidays, and languages 🆘 Ending the EU wouldn’t restore “freedom”—it would threaten cultural and political sovereignty The EU union setup is often considered "better" than the US state system in terms of sovereignty and flexibility This allows each country to make independent decisions while still benefiting from cooperation on trade, environmental standards, and other shared policies The EU model encourages policy diversity and experimentation. Countries can implement unique social, economic, or environmental policies without conflicting with the union, whereas US states are often limited by federal law The EU balances shared governance with national sovereignty, which is why the sooner the UK rejoins the EU the better We will most likely have lost all of the opt outs we had before Brexit, maybe it's time for the UK to join the EU on a similar terms as other nations - all for one and one for all 👍

Farrukh

168,375 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

👿👿 This made my blood boil!!! Trump said so many things that aren't true in this statement yesterday about America needing foreigners to train American workers, it's hard to know where to begin. But I'll try: 1. Phone manufacturing doesn't require high skilled labor. One can easily train the manual labor up required for this. But in the U.S., companies will likely use advanced manufacturing techniques that require 100x less manual labor. 2. America already has 41 semiconductor fabrication plants. Did you even know that? We make all kinds of chips already. Not necessarily that latest, cutting edge ones, but that's changing. 3. Semi fabs do not require large numbers of people to work in them like car factories. 4. Chip production is a specialty that American universities train people to do. Many American engineers have various aspects of chip making skills already. But chip making is an exception in that we may need some foreign labor to help in the short term. None of the other industries he mentions are anything like chip fabs. There is no need to generalize from the specific needs of chip makers to the rest of American workers. None. 5. The 'temporary' visas used to bring the 'thousands of foreign workers' into the country were changed into 'dual intent' visas in 2001. So every one of those workers will be seeking a Green Card and other visas to extend their stays and migrate here permanently. 6. The battery factory in Georgia was using ILLEGAL labor. We already have visa types for companies transfer needed staff to the U.S. Why didn't they use the L1 visa type that was available? And they weren't training American workers, they were doing all the work. They were also living 10 to a house poor living conditions. They also has other non-Korean illegal aliens working in the factory. What can we take from this? These foreign owned factories will be filled with foreign workers. Americans can drive Doordash and be the plumbers who fix their toilets...

War for the West

63,235 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten