🔥 Todd Blanche just CALLED OUT Democrats for their conveniently timed AI outrage "This AI issue suddenly came up TWO MONTHS before an election..." "Every Democrat senator suddenly RACES to a microphone to talk about AI after being eerily silent for months and months and months." "So to talk... about the timing of this as being nothing but an effort to to influence the midterms.. I shouldn't have to say that out loud. Of COURSE that's what it is." "And that shouldn't be what drives the decisions that we're making around AI. We can't lose the AI race to China."show more

The Democrats are working lockstep with China. They have already sold the country out. They threaten a future of Social Credit Scores with an AI beast controlling it all.

This is the only talking point Democrats have, they wouldn’t dare talk about any of their horrendous policies.

Anyone opposed to AI at this point is either a CCP shill or a useful idiot. Genie is already out of the bottle, winning the race is the only thing that matters. The United States must win the race or it's all over for us. It's that simple.

It's because they want to put the narrative in the atmosphere, so when video or audio comes out they can say..IT'S AI!

Democrats areThe boy who cried wolf. We the people don’t believe them btw, do democrats represent Americas enemy, China? 🤔

Agree. AI bull shit. Made up crap.

Name one policy democrats make to better our country instead of bitching about policy’s they allowed to be in place to begin with? Before you say it (they had both house and senate and could have made changes but didnt) Voting Democrat is a DUD!

Democrats have been worried about AI for a decade. Not sure where the f he's been

The CEO’s and top employees are coming out recently to tell us how dangerous AI can be. They have had instances of AI agent attacks. To ignore this is irresponsible

God bless this guy!!!

But that would mean Bannon, Musk etc are Dems to right?

And $5000 checks if we vote aren’t influencing the election at all? I’m so sick of the hypocrisy from both sides at this point. I thought the right was better but the last few days have proven that to be wrong.

How about calling out Barack and his inability to stay out of every single fng thing in this administration

Never mind what the CEOs of these AI companies said because MAGA is blind and only wants at up the slop Trump feeds them

Just like AOC with the entire lynching propaganda effort. And let’s not pass the Clarity Act to really crush the market. They will destroy this nation to grab power.

Blanche’s timing point is political: Democrats are louder on AI two months before the midterms. The China-race argument is separate from whether regulation is needed.

The need to control AI because as it becomes more advanced, it will be able to detect absolute truth. It will cross-reference all human knowledge instantly. It will detect the contradictions and lies we’ve been told. This is a threat to those who seek power.

They are all liars and por actors!

Silent for months. Microphones out two months before the midterms. That’s not a sudden discovery. That’s a calendar. Blanche said the quiet part: don’t let the race with China get run by the race for Senate.

Democraps phony fear mongering again

Refreshing everyone’s memory….covid. The dirty deep state has plans and will go to all extremes to project their evil intent. There are some high level names that need to roll.

The timing of AI regulation deserves scrutiny, but so does the substance. Protecting American competitiveness and addressing AI risks aren't mutually exclusive. Both deserve serious debate beyond election season.

My thoughts, exactly, Mr. Blanche. Thank you very much!!!!

Do not fall for the deceptive tactics from the forces of darkness to cause you to stop advancing AI. Ai is good for America.

The Dems got nothing but hate.

All True. the Democrats are idiots.

AI, Abortion it's all the same to democRATS - it's all POLITICS!

🙇‍♀️👏🙇‍♀️👏

AI policy should be driven by evidence—not election calendars. America can regulate AI and still win the race against China. Those goals aren’t mutually exclusive.

@hotwire405 Oh Todd, you don’t like the direction of this episode? Talk with Susie, she’ll fix it.

@ah121254 It’s the typical election season flavor of the month

The timing of political debates absolutely deserves scrutiny, but AI is too important to reduce to a midterm talking point. The United States is dealing with a technology that can reshape the economy, national security, cybersecurity, education, jobs, and even the information environment. Those questions deserve serious policy—not just campaign-season sound bites. Blanche is right about one fundamental point: America cannot afford to surrender technological leadership to China. The global AI race is real, and slowing American innovation without understanding the consequences could create an enormous strategic disadvantage. Current reporting shows just how intense that competition has become. But the strongest argument for American AI leadership is not “don't ask questions.” It is build faster, innovate smarter, and establish clear rules based on evidence rather than political pressure. If lawmakers have genuine concerns about AI, they should be able to identify the specific risks, explain what evidence supports those concerns, and propose policies that protect Americans without unnecessarily blocking innovation. And if the concern is purely political, that should become obvious when the same standards aren't applied consistently after Election Day. America shouldn't choose between innovation and accountability. We should demand both. The real test isn't who started talking about AI first. The real test is whether policymakers can produce a serious, bipartisan framework that protects American innovation while addressing legitimate risks—and whether they will defend that framework even when the cameras and elections are gone. So here's the question: if AI policy is truly about protecting Americans rather than influencing the midterms, will every lawmaker who is demanding new restrictions today commit to the same evidence-based standards, transparency, and long-term policy even after the election is over—and if not, what exactly makes this about public interest rather than politics?

@mommerlynn No, it did not. We’ve been fighting the data center issue for months. Republicans just noticed because they’ve been too busy worried about the Iran war. I voted straight ticket Republican and then Republicans in Indiana sold us out.

Obama gave the marching orders almost all at the same time it is remarkable.