Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Trump announced that the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs has actually made the President’s authority to impose them more powerful, not weaker. “I don’t think the court meant that… The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade... show more

Jammles

35,799 subscribers

59,520 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."

Eric Daugherty

923,839 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

“The ability to block, embargo, restrict license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under a EPA has been fully confirmed by this decision. So now there's no doubt, because there were a lot of questions about tariffs because no president was smart enough to use them to protect our country from those countries and businesses that were ripping us off. You took a look at the deficits that we had with some of these countries. It was disgraceful what they got away with for many, many decades. But now we know because this decision affirms all those things that some people weren't sure about in order to protect.” -President Donald J. Trump

“The ability to block, embargo, restrict license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under a EPA has been fully confirmed by this decision. So now there's no doubt, because there were a lot of questions about tariffs because no president was smart enough to use them to protect our country from those countries and businesses that were ripping us off. You took a look at the deficits that we had with some of these countries. It was disgraceful what they got away with for many, many decades. But now we know because this decision affirms all those things that some people weren't sure about in order to protect.” -President Donald J. Trump

ThePersistence

91,898 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Trump said the Supreme Court’s ruling that invalidated most of his tariffs actually “made a president’s ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear.” “I can charge much more than I was charging.”

President Trump said the Supreme Court’s ruling that invalidated most of his tariffs actually “made a president’s ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear.” “I can charge much more than I was charging.”

ABC News

118,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Trump: While I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a President's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less.

Trump: While I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a President's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less.

Open Source Intel

68,688 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court deemed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give President Trump the power to unilaterally impose tariffs. ABC News' Jon Karl has more on what this means.

In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court deemed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give President Trump the power to unilaterally impose tariffs. ABC News' Jon Karl has more on what this means.

ABC News

55,186 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less."

President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less."

CSPAN

28,119 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Is it making sense yet? While exposing the Supreme Court, this “decision” actually CODIFIED the President’s powers… President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less." Do you remember what we posed about the acts of 1962 and 1974 months ago? Scroll down 👇👇 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸

Is it making sense yet? While exposing the Supreme Court, this “decision” actually CODIFIED the President’s powers… President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less." Do you remember what we posed about the acts of 1962 and 1974 months ago? Scroll down 👇👇 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸

Paul White Gold Eagle

50,992 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN — STEPHEN MILLER UNLEASHES: "As horrendous as the Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on John Roberts' court and the continued TORTURING of our statutes and our constitution, here's the good news!" "The court also affirmed the president has the authority under section 301, section 232, section 122, section 338, and many other provisions of federal law, that the president can levy tariffs on foreign nations." "So his program will not only be fully reconstituted, but it will be EXPANDED." "The Supreme Court also affirmed that under IEEPA, the president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade." "So the net result of all this is we're going to keep and grow the tariffs to bring back American manufacturing, which keeps prices low by incentivizing products to be made here in America." "But it also means that President Trump has even more tools when it comes to dealing with foreign countries that undermine our security." Stephen Miller BOOM.

🚨 JUST IN — STEPHEN MILLER UNLEASHES: "As horrendous as the Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on John Roberts' court and the continued TORTURING of our statutes and our constitution, here's the good news!" "The court also affirmed the president has the authority under section 301, section 232, section 122, section 338, and many other provisions of federal law, that the president can levy tariffs on foreign nations." "So his program will not only be fully reconstituted, but it will be EXPANDED." "The Supreme Court also affirmed that under IEEPA, the president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade." "So the net result of all this is we're going to keep and grow the tariffs to bring back American manufacturing, which keeps prices low by incentivizing products to be made here in America." "But it also means that President Trump has even more tools when it comes to dealing with foreign countries that undermine our security." Stephen Miller BOOM.

Eric Daugherty

862,621 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Senator Chuck Grassley, from my home state of Iowa, has proposed legislation that would restrict the president’s ability to impose tariffs by executive action. Three cheers for Grassley.

Senator Chuck Grassley, from my home state of Iowa, has proposed legislation that would restrict the president’s ability to impose tariffs by executive action. Three cheers for Grassley.

Steve Hanke

50,239 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Miller: As cowardly as The Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on the Roberts' court, and the continued torturing of our statutes and our constitution, here is the good news…. The president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade.

Miller: As cowardly as The Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on the Roberts' court, and the continued torturing of our statutes and our constitution, here is the good news…. The president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade.

Acyn

476,834 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | Washington, DC | Visuals from outside the White House. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled against President Trump’s power to impose tariffs, declaring that his use of emergency authority to levy broad tariffs on US trading partners was unlawful.

#WATCH | Washington, DC | Visuals from outside the White House. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled against President Trump’s power to impose tariffs, declaring that his use of emergency authority to levy broad tariffs on US trading partners was unlawful.

ANI

41,718 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: A federal court has struck down Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that he overstepped his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The court found that the president cannot sidestep Congress to impose trade policy, declaring the tariffs unconstitutional and void. Remember “liberation day?”

BREAKING: A federal court has struck down Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that he overstepped his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The court found that the president cannot sidestep Congress to impose trade policy, declaring the tariffs unconstitutional and void. Remember “liberation day?”

Ed Krassenstein

253,340 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump said Friday that the Supreme Court's decision to throw out his signature tariffs was disappointing and other alternatives would be used to implement trade duties. Trump said he would sign an order on Friday to impose a 10% global tariff under a different authority, “over and above our normal tariffs already being charged.” Read more: 🔗

President Trump said Friday that the Supreme Court's decision to throw out his signature tariffs was disappointing and other alternatives would be used to implement trade duties. Trump said he would sign an order on Friday to impose a 10% global tariff under a different authority, “over and above our normal tariffs already being charged.” Read more: 🔗

The Wall Street Journal

84,582 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Trump: “In the event that Russia is not ready to make a deal to end the war, then the United States is fully prepared to impose a very strong round of powerful tariffs.”

Trump: “In the event that Russia is not ready to make a deal to end the war, then the United States is fully prepared to impose a very strong round of powerful tariffs.”

The Bulwark

143,779 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Fox: The Supreme Court has made a decision on Trump's tariffs. This is a huge ruling. This law that grants the president emergency powers does not give him the power to levy these tariffs.

Fox: The Supreme Court has made a decision on Trump's tariffs. This is a huge ruling. This law that grants the president emergency powers does not give him the power to levy these tariffs.

FactPost

23,557 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Trump said the United States would impose a 35% tariff on imports from Canada next month and planned to impose blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most other trade partners

President Trump said the United States would impose a 35% tariff on imports from Canada next month and planned to impose blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most other trade partners

Reuters

85,882 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Trump's tariffs have hurt American consumers, businesses, and ports. On top of that, the Constitution clearly states that Congress—not the President—has the authority to impose tariffs. SCOTUS needs to defend the separation of powers by ruling against Trump's illegal tariffs.

Trump's tariffs have hurt American consumers, businesses, and ports. On top of that, the Constitution clearly states that Congress—not the President—has the authority to impose tariffs. SCOTUS needs to defend the separation of powers by ruling against Trump's illegal tariffs.

Congressman Robert Garcia

10,688 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The foreign policy of the United States is conducted by President Donald J. Trump — not by a court — and no court in the United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of the United States. It's that simple. End of story.

The foreign policy of the United States is conducted by President Donald J. Trump — not by a court — and no court in the United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of the United States. It's that simple. End of story.

Secretary Marco Rubio

2,068,370 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Supreme Court’s decision allowing states to restrict transgender care for minors is the latest blow to a movement under fire.

The Supreme Court’s decision allowing states to restrict transgender care for minors is the latest blow to a movement under fire.

The Wall Street Journal

110,087 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: President Trump signals that despite disagreeing with the court's holding, he is not backing down on future tariffs: "Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward." "That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs."

NEW: President Trump signals that despite disagreeing with the court's holding, he is not backing down on future tariffs: "Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward." "That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs."

Fox News

179,977 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten