Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Tunisia and Morocco are both below replacement level, combined with high emigration rates, while having a GDP per capita of only around $5,000. If these trends continue, it is inevitable that North Africans will be replaced by Africans. Just look at how many are arriving:

77,092 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The earliest man-made mirrors were crafted around 6,000 BC in Anatolia. These were made from polished obsidian — a naturally occurring, glossy volcanic glass. Later, around 4,000 to 3,000 BC, civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt began making mirrors out of polished copper and bronze. China made copper mirrors around 4,000 BC and bronze mirrors as early as 2,000 BC, and they were mass-producing them by the 2nd Century BC. In the Indus Valley, bronze mirrors were made between 2,800 and 2500 BC. In Europe, Minoan and Mycenean mirrors date from the Second millenium BC. Celts made them up their conquest by the Romans, who were the first to make crude, glass mirrors out of tin and lead in the First Century. So what happened in sub-Saharan Africa? If, as we have repeatedly been told by woke-science since the Second World War, we are ‘all the same’, all homo-sapiens with the same DNA, and race is a construct of White supremacism rather than the genetic and environmental inheritance of thousands of years, why didn’t Africans invent the mirror, along with pretty much every other technology since the Iron Age? We accept that the Danish are the tallest people on the planet; that South-east Asians are the smallest; that Ethiopians are the best long-distance runners; that Pacific Island rugby players are genetically built for rugby; and that the inheritance of generations of farmers makes French players from the south uncommonly strong. But as soon as we come to the brain, which is part of our body, differences are all attributed to environmental and social factors, and anyone saying otherwise is racist. The average IQ in sub-Saharan Africa is 68. Out of 49 countries, 10 have average IQs below 60, indicating feeble-mindedness. 18 have average IQs between 60 and 69, indicative of what in the West is categorised as an intellectual disability. 15 are between 70 and 79, indicative of of cognitive impairment, difficulty with learning and abstract thinking. The remaining countries have produced no data. None are above 80. This disparity continues even among Africans in Western countries, where their improved health, medical, environmental and educational conditions have failed to raise their average IQ to anything approaching that of Europeans. In the USA and around the world, Europeans have an average IQ of about 100, while Africans have an average IQ of about 85, only slightly above the highest average IQ in Africa. Even this is indicative of difficulty in learning skills or graduating from a secondary school or only doing so with low grades. Studies show that these racial differences show up before the age of 5 and, most importantly, they last a lifetime. When we look at the ongoing inability to socialise, educate and civilise Africans in Europe and across the world, particularly in the Western countries to which they are being imported in their tens of millions, we should recall this footage of members of the Hadzabe tribe in Tanzania being shown a mirror for the first time. Unsurprisingly, both their fellow Africans and the acolytes of woke have denied the veracity of this footage, which does not accord with the fantasies of their ideology, and of course have denounced it as ‘racist’. But it is genuine. Africans got their first bronze mirrors from trading with Romans, not from making them themselves. It is significant that, like the Africans setting off fireworks in an AirBnB let in the video on the right, the Africans in Tanzania in the video on the left react to the mirror first with fright and then by trying to smash it. Like the Black immigrants who go on rampages of destruction whether celebrating the victory of a football team or protesting the arrest of an African for the numerous murders they commit, Africans do not create; rather, they destroy. We have been trying for centuries to get Africans to pick up the mirror and discover how it works, then to imitate it and build one for themselves; but whether it’s in the home of a White family or the bush of Tanzania, that will never happen. The mirror is smashed, the firework is lit, the bottles are smashed, the car window is broken, the bus stop torn down, the woman is raped, the White person is stabbed, our towns and countries are turned into African slums and jungles. This won’t change. Under the UN programme of replacement migration, it will only get worse. If you want to know more about this programme and what we, the people of Britain, Europe and the West who have to live with the behaviour of Africans every day, can do to stop being overrun by incompatible cultures, races and behaviours that are destroying our own, you may be interested in my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. The link is below.

Simon Elmer

47,091 просмотров • 4 дней назад

There is no doubt that this man, Ibrahim Traoré, is the most popular African leader at the moment. He is a soldier who took over power in Burkina Faso and became president. His popularity highlights two key issues; the lack of faith in electoral democracy on the continent and the tragic failure of elected governments to deliver basic services to their citizens. Many political science scholars I have spoken to argue that perhaps the time has come for Africa to reflect on the type of governance that works for it. Today’s democracy is inherently foreign to how Africa was governed before colonial rule. Colonial rule brought immense cruelty to the natives, robbing them of their cattle and looting their resources. When colonialism ended, democracy was imposed as a prerequisite for independence in many African countries. Sadly, this project has largely failed, with success stories limited to just a handful of nations. Was it ever realistic to implement a one-size-fits-all approach across all 54 African countries without considering their unique local circumstances? Should Africans think about what might work in the absence of the many senseless rigged elections? Is it possible to get all stake holders on one table and instead govern together? Many thinkers have argued that Africa's governance systems were diverse before colonialism and often centered around local customs, traditions, and values. The imposition of Western-style democracy at independence did not consider these indigenous systems, and this disconnect has contributed to the challenges many African countries have faced in consolidating their democracies. Young Africans are looking at the style of governance in the Sahel region, particularly in Burkina Faso, where Ibrahim Traoré has revolutionised the country, implementing many changes that have greatly appealed to young Africans. Many young Africans are asking themselves if electoral democracy has not been part of the problems they have because it is easily manipulated and abused. “What has democracy done for Africa and Africans except feed the insatiable appetite to loot by Africa’s political elites,” many are now asking loudly! What is your view?

Hopewell Chin’ono

56,929 просмотров • 1 год назад