Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Tyrant border patrol agent pulls over driver to harass him because he filed a complaint on the agent. A driver named Terry was pulled into an interior Border Patrol checkpoint in southern Arizona. Exercising his constitutional rights, Terry calmly declined to answer immigration questions and refused consent for a... vehicle search.Agent G. Hoyt was one of the officers on scene during that encounter. Terry filed a formal misconduct complaint against him. Fast forward over a year later to this stop. Agent Hoyt spots Terry on the road in southern Arizona, pulls him over, refusing to tell Terry why he was being stopped, only demanding his ID. Upon recognizing the agent, Terry immediately tells him he’s "digging a deeper hole." During the stop the agent never cited a single traffic violation or valid legal reason for initiating the stop. Instead, he immediately demanded Terry's identification as well as asking for him to shut off the vehicle and give him thy keys. Knowing his rights, Terry remained in his vehicle and repeatedly asked a simple question: Why was I pulled over? When Agent Hoyt refused to give a lawful reason and insisted on seeing ID, the standoff ensured. Rather than de-escalating or explaining the basis for the stop, the encounter escalated into a full multi-officer response: Multiple agents responded to the scene, turning a simple stop into a heavy law enforcement presence. Agents set up stop sticks around Terry’s tires to prevent him from leaving. A narcotics/contraband K-9 was brought out to conduct an exterior air sniff around the vehicle. Despite the pressure, the K-9 failed to alert, and agents were unable to establish any probable cause or evidence of wrongdoing. After roughly 35 minutes of wasted time on the side of the road, Terry was told he was free to go—without a single ticket, citation, or charge. This is yet another complaint that Terry files on the BP agents.show more

Giggling Gannon

275,032 subscribers

247,749 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Rawhide Enforcement

Rawhide Enforcementvor 2 Monaten

Looks like the stop is illegal. Under Rodriguez v. United States 575 US 348 (2015) officers cannot prolong a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff without independent reasonable suspicion. This officer would have to have independent articulable facts to conduct the primary stop. It is doubtful from the video that the officer had specific, objective facts that would suggest that a crime or traffic violation has happened. Therefore for the reason for the stop was illegal.

Profilbild von Tburdy

Tburdyvor 2 Monaten

Correct responses 'you'll know who I am when I file a complaint through my lawyer' 'this guy harassed me a year ago and he's doing it again'

Profilbild von DAVE Foos FOSS

DAVE Foos FOSSvor 2 Monaten

Could you just imagine if the Border Patrol was this concerned with the 25-30M illegals who entered our nation under the Biden/Harris Administration? Instead, they let them pass through, gave them clothes, food, money, transportation & housing. All without any IDs or background checks. That was TREASON by definition. They put every American citizens life at risk.

Profilbild von Michael

Michaelvor 2 Monaten

May I see your id. Yes. Here it is. Thank you. I see you are a citizen. Have a nice day. Thank you. By. Off with the rest of my day after 30 seconds of inconvenience. Pick your battles.

Profilbild von Jax

Jaxvor 2 Monaten

I now believe everything that happened in last 6 years was planned. All with the end goal of a mass surveillance program and removal of the 4th Amendment among others.

Profilbild von Brian Clark

Brian Clarkvor 2 Monaten

I’m all for complying when it makes sense. This guy started with asking who’s car this is. Immediately confrontational and accusatory tone without any justification. Seems like the first agent may boil cats for fun. It’s hard not to fight back when he’s immediately confrontational in tone and seemingly ready to violate your rights.

Profilbild von Jhay Flanagan

Jhay Flanaganvor 2 Monaten

You know your in trouble when the cowboy tyrant shows face

Profilbild von TheMemeWhoLaughed

TheMemeWhoLaughedvor 2 Monaten

Police dogs that they use for stiff test need to be tracked. If they go below 90% that is a false hit the dog has to retire. Cases that the handled keeps having dogs false hit need to be charged.

Profilbild von Doug White🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Doug White🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸vor 2 Monaten

Interior border control points have been normal in the Southwest for DECADES. I have been through them many times, with zero issues. Being as difficult as possible isn't quite the same as exercising his constitutional rights. LEOs can ask for ID, and you can be a dick about it, it's a choice.

Profilbild von Tia4419

Tia4419vor 2 Monaten

Why didn’t the officer just say, “we’re doing a smuggling check?” Isn’t that part of the job on the border? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Profilbild von TheGreatytNorth

TheGreatytNorthvor 2 Monaten

And they wonder why we hate their guts. I used to support the blue. Not any more. They're all just lawless tyrants doing whatever they feel like with zero consequences.

Profilbild von GVDC

GVDCvor 2 Monaten

Americans, you need to fucking wake up immediately. Your life is going to depend on it. These things are nothing more than pedophile politician protectors. Start dumping them in the fucking street already.😡😡😡

Profilbild von Ashley Cooper

Ashley Coopervor 2 Monaten

Terry must be doing something right, if they're so desperate to shut him up

Profilbild von Steven

Stevenvor 2 Monaten

No, you don’t unless he accuses you of a crime you do not have time your name show him ID and you don’t have to stay there if he says you’re being detained, he has to charge you with something or accuse you of a crime of some sort

Profilbild von Svengance IV

Svengance IVvor 2 Monaten

So it went from immigration to immigration and narcotics…fuck these gestapo stoggaf

Profilbild von Yeah Nope

Yeah Nopevor 2 Monaten

Corrupt cops lose their shit when their ego is challenged. #PoliceCorruption #EndJudicialImmunity #EndQualifiedImmunity #PunishCorruptionNotTaxpayers #SacktheBlue #TheCorruptBlueLine #HonorYourOath #EarningtheHate

Profilbild von Jeff

Jeffvor 2 Monaten

“Tyrant”? The driver is an entitled sack of shit. Fuck him.

Profilbild von Steven J. Campbell | NQ

Steven J. Campbell | NQvor 2 Monaten

Most people think that a Leo has to tell you what they’re investigating but they don’t. They can withhold the reason until after they arrest you. A terry stop you’re required to provide ID if you’re the operator of the vehicle. You can go verify all this.

Profilbild von Tyrannis Evello Mortem

Tyrannis Evello Mortemvor 2 Monaten

These agents are trying to protect our borders and catch illegal aliens. These “auditors” are more of a hindrance than help.

Profilbild von Shaun

Shaunvor 2 Monaten

That's not a tyrant border patrol agent, that's a car with an asshole behind the wheel that has watched to many tiktok videos and now he thinks he's above the law

Profilbild von Skytyme

Skytymevor 2 Monaten

Yeah, land of the free sure is isn’t it? These are your tyrant, scumbag slave masters, and they get away with it with no satisfaction for the citizen. That’s the most interrogating part.

Profilbild von Van Smallwood

Van Smallwoodvor 2 Monaten

To this day, I don't understand people if a cop pulls you over. It doesn't matter what they pull you over for just be respectful. Do what they want if they try to arrest you on some BS charge then just fight it in court if they try to give you a ticket fight in court

Profilbild von nunya beezwax

nunya beezwaxvor 2 Monaten

That was not Terry. That was me. Agent Hoyt illegally searched my car at a checkpoint a few months prior. I filed a complaint on him. He recognized me at the same checkpoint when I was waved through by another agent. Hoyt chased me down and conducted an illegal traffic stop...

Profilbild von ★Kim Belicious★

★Kim Belicious★vor 2 Monaten

None of them acted like tyrants. The guy recording was being an asshole and waisting everyone's time. Just give him an ID and be on your way in less than 5 min. Everyone wants to be combative on video and then assert their "rights". Yes you have a "right" to be an ass. Woohoo 🙄

Profilbild von Pauline Tompkins

Pauline Tompkinsvor 2 Monaten

The driver is a complete asshole. Why not be polite and just give the officer his drivers license.

Profilbild von DarthShotRite

DarthShotRitevor 2 Monaten

That F’ing idiot in the car caused the major situation.

Profilbild von Nunya Bidness

Nunya Bidnessvor 2 Monaten

The process is the punishment.

Profilbild von Ray

Rayvor 2 Monaten

Yeah, I think the alert with the Dog thing is a bunch of corruption. They need to reverse that law. All they do is touch the car so the dog jumps on it. It’s so stupid.

Profilbild von Rob Bell

Rob Bellvor 2 Monaten

there's nothing wrong with the driver asking the guy why he was pulled over to begin with? Fishing expeditions are not supported by the constitution

Profilbild von Xzavier🇺🇲

Xzavier🇺🇲vor 2 Monaten

That’s Terry Bressi, a well-documented University of Arizona engineer who’s been doing this for over 20 years. He’s been stopped at the SR 86 Border Patrol checkpoint hundreds of times (hundreds of documented encounters), records every interaction, refuses citizenship questions and vehicle searches as a matter of principle, and has sued over previous stops—including a $210k settlement after he was dragged out of his car and arrested in 2002. This isn’t some random driver who just happened to assert his rights. It’s the same deliberate pattern activists use: poke the system on purpose, create a confrontation by non-compliance, film the reaction, then present it as pure government overreach. The agent still has to have a lawful basis for the stop, but the “victim” framing ignores the long history of intentional testing.

Profilbild von Damon Petty

Damon Pettyvor 2 Monaten

There is a Constitution. It made the USA possible and supported all the liberty and prosperity now established. Follow the Constitution. If you don’t know if these agents were following or violating it, then educate yourself.

Profilbild von Citizenpips

Citizenpipsvor 2 Monaten

This guys a dick and out to cause an issue - he could easily have cooperated but chose his route - the guys did their job and moved on and the dick ? well he learnt the hard way …

Profilbild von American-Patriot🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

American-Patriot🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸vor 2 Monaten

it's more like the idiot in the car is the problem. Tell him your fucking name and birthday and drive on.

Profilbild von Diane "Blossom"

Diane "Blossom"vor 2 Monaten

If there is one thing Mexicanos know that Americanos may not yet is there is always another border crossing to use.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen was riding his bike in Laredo, Texas… when Border Patrol agents pulled alongside him and illegally tried to block him in. When he kept riding, they chased him down, physically grabbed him by the arm, and immediately started demanding identification and asking where he was from. He told them he born in Laredo, Texas. But that was not good enough. The agent asked, “What high school did you go to?” He answered that, too… and they still kept demanding ID, over and over again. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. In America, law enforcement don’t get to randomly stop people, physically grab them, and demand identification because they feel like it. Being on a bike isn’t a crime. You also don’t have to carry an ID on you unless you are operating a motor vehicle… which he was not. So, demanding an ID, without probable cause, is illegal. And the cherry on top? When the man went to use his phone, an agent tried to stop him by grabbing it… apparently unaware the entire encounter was already being recorded by his glasses. If Border Patrol can stop an American born citizen riding his bike, demand his papers, and put their hands on him without stating a lawful reason… every American should be paying attention.

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen was riding his bike in Laredo, Texas… when Border Patrol agents pulled alongside him and illegally tried to block him in. When he kept riding, they chased him down, physically grabbed him by the arm, and immediately started demanding identification and asking where he was from. He told them he born in Laredo, Texas. But that was not good enough. The agent asked, “What high school did you go to?” He answered that, too… and they still kept demanding ID, over and over again. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. In America, law enforcement don’t get to randomly stop people, physically grab them, and demand identification because they feel like it. Being on a bike isn’t a crime. You also don’t have to carry an ID on you unless you are operating a motor vehicle… which he was not. So, demanding an ID, without probable cause, is illegal. And the cherry on top? When the man went to use his phone, an agent tried to stop him by grabbing it… apparently unaware the entire encounter was already being recorded by his glasses. If Border Patrol can stop an American born citizen riding his bike, demand his papers, and put their hands on him without stating a lawful reason… every American should be paying attention.

Jesus Freakin Congress

890,513 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨ICE agents pulled a man over, accused him of a traffic violation that his own DASH CAM disproved, then illegally used that stop to demand his immigration status, in Pittsburgh. And this is exactly what it looks like when a traffic stop becomes an illegal fishing expedition… for immigration status. In this video, ICE agents surround the man’s car, with what appears to be a police vehicle behind him. A masked ICE agent aggressively approaches the passenger window while another ICE agent goes to the driver’s window and demands his ID. ICE agents are federal immigration officers, they aren’t local police… So, why are ICE agents the ones surrounding this car, confronting the people inside, and accusing the driver of a traffic violation… while the cop appears to walk up afterward? If this was actually a traffic stop, why is the cop not initiating and enforcing the traffic violation? The driver asks why he is being stopped. The agent tells him he was “riding that guy’s ass” and claims he was following the vehicle too closely. Except there’s a problem… his dash cam video shows the exact opposite. He was traveling in his lane when another car… coming from a merge lane… pulled directly in front of him. That is the moment ICE agents appear to turn on their lights, since the driver slows down and pulls over. So, he understandably says, “Me? I wasn’t following anybody.” The agent doubles down, claiming he was too close and that he “has to be a car length away.” Then, they demand that both people get out of the vehicle. The passenger is taken by ICE, while another agent asks the driver whether he has any weapons. And then comes the real reason for the stop… “Are you allowed to be here? Are you illegal? Are you allowed to be in this country?” The driver tells them he has his resident card and hands it over. Eventually, they let him go. And THIS is where the constitutional violations become impossible to ignore. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. A traffic stop is a seizure, meaning the government needs reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation, or crime, actually occurred. Even during a lawful traffic stop, officers cannot prolong the stop to investigate an unrelated matter without additional reasonable suspicion. So, when the alleged traffic violation turns into demands for identification, orders to exit the vehicle, questions about whether the people in the car are “illegal,” and an immigration-status check… the Fourth Amendment comes into question. And the fact that they eventually let this man go, after determining he was lawfully present, makes this even more disturbing. Because what exactly was the point of stopping him? He clearly wasn’t violating any tailgating law. So this wasn’t a legitimate traffic stop…it was a fabricated pretext to investigate his immigration status. And that is precisely why the Constitution exists. Because the government doesn’t get to say, “We wanted to check who you are, so we made up a reason to stop you.” And ICE does not get a free pass to stop Americans, and legal residents, and demand they prove their citizenship. The government has to follow the law, too.

🚨ICE agents pulled a man over, accused him of a traffic violation that his own DASH CAM disproved, then illegally used that stop to demand his immigration status, in Pittsburgh. And this is exactly what it looks like when a traffic stop becomes an illegal fishing expedition… for immigration status. In this video, ICE agents surround the man’s car, with what appears to be a police vehicle behind him. A masked ICE agent aggressively approaches the passenger window while another ICE agent goes to the driver’s window and demands his ID. ICE agents are federal immigration officers, they aren’t local police… So, why are ICE agents the ones surrounding this car, confronting the people inside, and accusing the driver of a traffic violation… while the cop appears to walk up afterward? If this was actually a traffic stop, why is the cop not initiating and enforcing the traffic violation? The driver asks why he is being stopped. The agent tells him he was “riding that guy’s ass” and claims he was following the vehicle too closely. Except there’s a problem… his dash cam video shows the exact opposite. He was traveling in his lane when another car… coming from a merge lane… pulled directly in front of him. That is the moment ICE agents appear to turn on their lights, since the driver slows down and pulls over. So, he understandably says, “Me? I wasn’t following anybody.” The agent doubles down, claiming he was too close and that he “has to be a car length away.” Then, they demand that both people get out of the vehicle. The passenger is taken by ICE, while another agent asks the driver whether he has any weapons. And then comes the real reason for the stop… “Are you allowed to be here? Are you illegal? Are you allowed to be in this country?” The driver tells them he has his resident card and hands it over. Eventually, they let him go. And THIS is where the constitutional violations become impossible to ignore. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. A traffic stop is a seizure, meaning the government needs reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation, or crime, actually occurred. Even during a lawful traffic stop, officers cannot prolong the stop to investigate an unrelated matter without additional reasonable suspicion. So, when the alleged traffic violation turns into demands for identification, orders to exit the vehicle, questions about whether the people in the car are “illegal,” and an immigration-status check… the Fourth Amendment comes into question. And the fact that they eventually let this man go, after determining he was lawfully present, makes this even more disturbing. Because what exactly was the point of stopping him? He clearly wasn’t violating any tailgating law. So this wasn’t a legitimate traffic stop…it was a fabricated pretext to investigate his immigration status. And that is precisely why the Constitution exists. Because the government doesn’t get to say, “We wanted to check who you are, so we made up a reason to stop you.” And ICE does not get a free pass to stop Americans, and legal residents, and demand they prove their citizenship. The government has to follow the law, too.

Jesus Freakin Congress

156,161 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ryan Garton told AP he saw immigration enforcement agents pinning down a man on the side of the road in a Chicago suburb as he was driving home. He pulled over to document what was happening on video. One agent had his knee on the man’s back and was “beating up on him,” Garton said. An agent told local police that they mistook the man for a fugitive and released him after realizing he is a U.S. citizen, according to a police statement.

Ryan Garton told AP he saw immigration enforcement agents pinning down a man on the side of the road in a Chicago suburb as he was driving home. He pulled over to document what was happening on video. One agent had his knee on the man’s back and was “beating up on him,” Garton said. An agent told local police that they mistook the man for a fugitive and released him after realizing he is a U.S. citizen, according to a police statement.

The Associated Press

462,294 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

Jesus Freakin Congress

143,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Marimar Martinez, the Chicago woman whom a Border Patrol agent shot five times last year, says she was only at the hospital for three hours before agents rushed her out. She then was admitted to a second hospital because she was through from her bandages. "As we left the hospital, I was escorted out through the back in a wheelchair. I observed over dozens of border patrol agents waiting outside the hospital. One of them, one of the agents came up to me with his cell phone and took a photograph of me. It was the same agent who had previously kept coming in and out of my room, and I had to repeatedly tell him to leave. I told him I did not consent for him to photograph me, but he did not care. It still haunts me that this agent has my photo on his phone. Was this the agent that shot me? Was this a trophy for him?"

Marimar Martinez, the Chicago woman whom a Border Patrol agent shot five times last year, says she was only at the hospital for three hours before agents rushed her out. She then was admitted to a second hospital because she was through from her bandages. "As we left the hospital, I was escorted out through the back in a wheelchair. I observed over dozens of border patrol agents waiting outside the hospital. One of them, one of the agents came up to me with his cell phone and took a photograph of me. It was the same agent who had previously kept coming in and out of my room, and I had to repeatedly tell him to leave. I told him I did not consent for him to photograph me, but he did not care. It still haunts me that this agent has my photo on his phone. Was this the agent that shot me? Was this a trophy for him?"

Heartland Signal

11,626 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents violently pulled a U.S. citizen PASSENGER from a vehicle, slamming him to the ground… Then shouted that he had a gun, even though he didn’t. In Tucson, Arizona, state troopers pulled over a vehicle. While they were stopped on the side of the road, the state trooper called Border Patrol because the PASSENGER appeared to be Hispanic. When Border Patrol arrived, the situation immediately escalated to agents smashed both passenger-side windows. One agent tried to hit the phone out of the driver’s hand, who was recording, as they violently ripped the backseat passenger out of the vehicle, and threw him onto the ground, while multiple agents pin him down. Then, an agent ordered the driver out of the vehicle. She responded, “I didn’t do anything.” The agent replied, “Step out or you are going to get tackled.” At that point, at least three agents already had the passenger pinned, with his hands behind his back, when another agent suddenly yelled, “Gun!” A fourth agent responded, “He has a gun?” The driver immediately yells back, “NO! He has NO gun. WE HAVE NO WEAPONS!” The agent, closest to the car, was startled by this, appearing to forget the driver was still inside… and filming. That’s when he reached into the vehicle, grabbed her phone, threw it from her hand, and attempted to pull her out of the car. There is a lot going on in this video, so let’s break this down… First… you don’t get to detain people based on how they look. The Fourth Amendment requires individualized, reasonable suspicion. Not “he looked Hispanic.” Second… a passenger, during a traffic stop, is not automatically required to identify themselves, or hand over ID. Law enforcement needs a lawful basis… like reasonable suspicion that that specific person committed a crime… to demand identification. Third… even when someone is lawfully detained, they are only required to comply with lawful orders tied to THAT detention. A passenger doesn’t lose constitutional protections just because someone else was pulled over, while driving. Fourth… the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, in public, while they’re doing their job. Knocking a phone away, or throwing it because someone is filming, is violating that constitutional right. And finally, any use of force… breaking windows, pulling someone out of a car, and restraining them… has to be objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. That requires specific, articulable facts, not assumptions about identity. This wasn’t a checkpoint. It wasn’t a border stop. This was a traffic stop where a PASSENGER became the target because of how he looked. And if that’s enough to trigger federal agents breaking windows, and violently pulling U.S. citizens out of cars… then every single person should be demanding answers, and accountability. Because this could’ve ended with another U.S. citizen dead… And next time, that U.S. citizen could be you.

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents violently pulled a U.S. citizen PASSENGER from a vehicle, slamming him to the ground… Then shouted that he had a gun, even though he didn’t. In Tucson, Arizona, state troopers pulled over a vehicle. While they were stopped on the side of the road, the state trooper called Border Patrol because the PASSENGER appeared to be Hispanic. When Border Patrol arrived, the situation immediately escalated to agents smashed both passenger-side windows. One agent tried to hit the phone out of the driver’s hand, who was recording, as they violently ripped the backseat passenger out of the vehicle, and threw him onto the ground, while multiple agents pin him down. Then, an agent ordered the driver out of the vehicle. She responded, “I didn’t do anything.” The agent replied, “Step out or you are going to get tackled.” At that point, at least three agents already had the passenger pinned, with his hands behind his back, when another agent suddenly yelled, “Gun!” A fourth agent responded, “He has a gun?” The driver immediately yells back, “NO! He has NO gun. WE HAVE NO WEAPONS!” The agent, closest to the car, was startled by this, appearing to forget the driver was still inside… and filming. That’s when he reached into the vehicle, grabbed her phone, threw it from her hand, and attempted to pull her out of the car. There is a lot going on in this video, so let’s break this down… First… you don’t get to detain people based on how they look. The Fourth Amendment requires individualized, reasonable suspicion. Not “he looked Hispanic.” Second… a passenger, during a traffic stop, is not automatically required to identify themselves, or hand over ID. Law enforcement needs a lawful basis… like reasonable suspicion that that specific person committed a crime… to demand identification. Third… even when someone is lawfully detained, they are only required to comply with lawful orders tied to THAT detention. A passenger doesn’t lose constitutional protections just because someone else was pulled over, while driving. Fourth… the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, in public, while they’re doing their job. Knocking a phone away, or throwing it because someone is filming, is violating that constitutional right. And finally, any use of force… breaking windows, pulling someone out of a car, and restraining them… has to be objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. That requires specific, articulable facts, not assumptions about identity. This wasn’t a checkpoint. It wasn’t a border stop. This was a traffic stop where a PASSENGER became the target because of how he looked. And if that’s enough to trigger federal agents breaking windows, and violently pulling U.S. citizens out of cars… then every single person should be demanding answers, and accountability. Because this could’ve ended with another U.S. citizen dead… And next time, that U.S. citizen could be you.

Jesus Freakin Congress

228,008 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.

Jesus Freakin Congress

332,587 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught racially profiling and stalking a U.S. citizen, before pulling him over and demanding he prove his citizenship. According to the man filming, ICE followed him until they initiated a stop. As they detained the U.S. citizen, an agent reached into his vehicle and tried to take his ID. The man asked, “Why are you snatching my stuff?” The agent replied, “I’m not snatching your stuff. This is a lawful stop. Are you going to give me your ID?” Except… if this man is a U.S. citizen, what exactly was the lawful basis for the stop… and running his ID? The Fourth Amendment doesn’t become meaningless just because an ICE agent thinks someone looks undocumented. And here’s what makes even less sense… even if the vehicle was registered to someone who was undocumented, his driver’s license would immediately show he wasn’t that person. So, why was ICE still running his information through their system? Because if federal agents can stop Americans, demand identification, and investigate them simply because of how they look, then the constitutional protections, every American is supposed to have, don’t mean anything at all.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught racially profiling and stalking a U.S. citizen, before pulling him over and demanding he prove his citizenship. According to the man filming, ICE followed him until they initiated a stop. As they detained the U.S. citizen, an agent reached into his vehicle and tried to take his ID. The man asked, “Why are you snatching my stuff?” The agent replied, “I’m not snatching your stuff. This is a lawful stop. Are you going to give me your ID?” Except… if this man is a U.S. citizen, what exactly was the lawful basis for the stop… and running his ID? The Fourth Amendment doesn’t become meaningless just because an ICE agent thinks someone looks undocumented. And here’s what makes even less sense… even if the vehicle was registered to someone who was undocumented, his driver’s license would immediately show he wasn’t that person. So, why was ICE still running his information through their system? Because if federal agents can stop Americans, demand identification, and investigate them simply because of how they look, then the constitutional protections, every American is supposed to have, don’t mean anything at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

78,916 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Perfect way to handle an officer that just violated his rights. This officer pulled him over for a tint violation but then without consent took it upon him self to open the door of the vehicle and remove the firearm of the driver. Keep in mind the driver already provided his permit with his ID during the stop with the tint.

Perfect way to handle an officer that just violated his rights. This officer pulled him over for a tint violation but then without consent took it upon him self to open the door of the vehicle and remove the firearm of the driver. Keep in mind the driver already provided his permit with his ID during the stop with the tint.

Chuckling Charlie

107,220 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Border Patrol pulls over a 20-year-old in Slidell, LA for “white lights on the back of your vehicle… your reverse lights are on the whole time.” Then, before writing a single ticket, the agent asks: “What’s your citizenship?” The driver, Alan Laureano, was born in Slidell. His passenger — his 13-year-old stepbrother — was born in Pearl River, Louisiana. Both are U.S. citizens. Didn’t matter. Twice, on camera, the agent tells Laureano he’s going to “check” the kid and “if he’s illegal, I will take him.” He tries to open the 13-year-old’s car door himself. Laureano locks it and rolls the window down instead. The agent then interrogates the child directly — full name, spelling, date of birth, birthplace — while Laureano stands his ground and refuses to hand over his own ID, telling the agent he doesn’t have the right to stop him over a taillight. Immigration attorney Michael Gahagan reviewed the video and called it what it is: “an illegal detention.” Border Patrol isn’t authorized to detain someone over a traffic violation — they need independent reasonable suspicion of an immigration violation, and that has to come first, not get invented after the stop. DHS’s after-the-fact statement claims the stop was based on “reasonable suspicion or probable cause of federal law violations” — but doesn’t say what that violation was. WWL Louisiana asked twice. No answer either time. This is the pattern: pretext stop, pivot to citizenship, threaten a kid with removal before confirming anything. It only looks “routine” until you’re the one being asked to prove you belong in the country you were born in.

Border Patrol pulls over a 20-year-old in Slidell, LA for “white lights on the back of your vehicle… your reverse lights are on the whole time.” Then, before writing a single ticket, the agent asks: “What’s your citizenship?” The driver, Alan Laureano, was born in Slidell. His passenger — his 13-year-old stepbrother — was born in Pearl River, Louisiana. Both are U.S. citizens. Didn’t matter. Twice, on camera, the agent tells Laureano he’s going to “check” the kid and “if he’s illegal, I will take him.” He tries to open the 13-year-old’s car door himself. Laureano locks it and rolls the window down instead. The agent then interrogates the child directly — full name, spelling, date of birth, birthplace — while Laureano stands his ground and refuses to hand over his own ID, telling the agent he doesn’t have the right to stop him over a taillight. Immigration attorney Michael Gahagan reviewed the video and called it what it is: “an illegal detention.” Border Patrol isn’t authorized to detain someone over a traffic violation — they need independent reasonable suspicion of an immigration violation, and that has to come first, not get invented after the stop. DHS’s after-the-fact statement claims the stop was based on “reasonable suspicion or probable cause of federal law violations” — but doesn’t say what that violation was. WWL Louisiana asked twice. No answer either time. This is the pattern: pretext stop, pivot to citizenship, threaten a kid with removal before confirming anything. It only looks “routine” until you’re the one being asked to prove you belong in the country you were born in.

Dittie

772,007 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent admitted, ON VIDEO, that he had no legal justification to keep questioning a U.S. citizen about his immigration status… But continued harassing him anyway, while illegally detaining him… in Eagle, Idaho. In the video, mask ICE agents approach a construction site. One masked agent orders a man to put down the pole he’s carrying, so he can question him… while another agent walks up to a man who is setting concrete. The man setting concrete tells the agent he isn’t going to talk to him because he’s working. The agent ignores him and says… “Where were you born? We are looking for someone.” The man tells him he doesn’t care who they’re looking for… He’s working. Instead of leaving him alone, the agent gets in his way, and demands his identification. The man says he doesn’t have an ID on him… So, the agent demands his name. The man tells him he’s a legal U.S. citizen, and that’s all he needs to tell him. The agent ignores that, and keeps harassing him with… Where were you born? Where are you from? The United States? The U.S. citizens keeps trying to tell the agent he needs to work before the concrete is sets, and tries to walk away. But the agent keeps following and blocking the U.S. citizen until he finally tells the agent to get off of him, and demands the agent’s name and badge number. The agent responds… “I’m asking YOU the questions.” Then, another agent says, “Let’s go.” And the agent finally walks away, saying… “Okay, that’s fine. HE’S NOT OUR GUY ANYWAY.” THEN WHY THE HELL DID YOU KEEP HARASSING HIM?! ICE cannot just stop or detain someone because they want to know where they were born. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable seizures, and ICE agents need reasonable suspicion to detain someone for immigration questioning. And if this was just a “voluntary conversation,” the man was free to walk away. Instead, the agent followed him, blocked him from working, repeatedly demanded his identity and birthplace, and continued confronting him AFTER he tried to walk away. And that should piss everyone off. Because this wasn’t about finding the person they were looking for… The agent admitted that he KNEW the man wasn’t their guy. But that didn’t stop the armed federal agent from following and harassing a U.S. citizen. And it’s exactly how constitutional rights disappear… one “small” violation at a time… until we’re expected to accept the government treating our rights like they’re optional.

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent admitted, ON VIDEO, that he had no legal justification to keep questioning a U.S. citizen about his immigration status… But continued harassing him anyway, while illegally detaining him… in Eagle, Idaho. In the video, mask ICE agents approach a construction site. One masked agent orders a man to put down the pole he’s carrying, so he can question him… while another agent walks up to a man who is setting concrete. The man setting concrete tells the agent he isn’t going to talk to him because he’s working. The agent ignores him and says… “Where were you born? We are looking for someone.” The man tells him he doesn’t care who they’re looking for… He’s working. Instead of leaving him alone, the agent gets in his way, and demands his identification. The man says he doesn’t have an ID on him… So, the agent demands his name. The man tells him he’s a legal U.S. citizen, and that’s all he needs to tell him. The agent ignores that, and keeps harassing him with… Where were you born? Where are you from? The United States? The U.S. citizens keeps trying to tell the agent he needs to work before the concrete is sets, and tries to walk away. But the agent keeps following and blocking the U.S. citizen until he finally tells the agent to get off of him, and demands the agent’s name and badge number. The agent responds… “I’m asking YOU the questions.” Then, another agent says, “Let’s go.” And the agent finally walks away, saying… “Okay, that’s fine. HE’S NOT OUR GUY ANYWAY.” THEN WHY THE HELL DID YOU KEEP HARASSING HIM?! ICE cannot just stop or detain someone because they want to know where they were born. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable seizures, and ICE agents need reasonable suspicion to detain someone for immigration questioning. And if this was just a “voluntary conversation,” the man was free to walk away. Instead, the agent followed him, blocked him from working, repeatedly demanded his identity and birthplace, and continued confronting him AFTER he tried to walk away. And that should piss everyone off. Because this wasn’t about finding the person they were looking for… The agent admitted that he KNEW the man wasn’t their guy. But that didn’t stop the armed federal agent from following and harassing a U.S. citizen. And it’s exactly how constitutional rights disappear… one “small” violation at a time… until we’re expected to accept the government treating our rights like they’re optional.

Jesus Freakin Congress

176,901 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

471,294 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A ICE officer fatally shot a man during a traffic stop in Franklin Park after the man allegedly resisted arrest and struck an agent with his vehicle, dragging him as he attempted to flee. The officer discharged his firearm, and the man was later pronounced deceased at a hospital. The injured agent remains hospitalized in stable condition.

A ICE officer fatally shot a man during a traffic stop in Franklin Park after the man allegedly resisted arrest and struck an agent with his vehicle, dragging him as he attempted to flee. The officer discharged his firearm, and the man was later pronounced deceased at a hospital. The injured agent remains hospitalized in stable condition.

Goofies Of Chicago

78,585 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Flock being used against a citizen in retaliation for exercising his first amendment right ----- Jones was in a private parking lot across the street from a police officer he was recording on his phone. The officer saw him recording and came over and harassed him, pulled him out of his car and arrested him. Jones later filed a complaint and ultimately found that because of his complaint the police department proceeded to search for his location over 100 times on the Flock system. full video:

Flock being used against a citizen in retaliation for exercising his first amendment right ----- Jones was in a private parking lot across the street from a police officer he was recording on his phone. The officer saw him recording and came over and harassed him, pulled him out of his car and arrested him. Jones later filed a complaint and ultimately found that because of his complaint the police department proceeded to search for his location over 100 times on the Flock system. full video:

Orwell Day

128,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A confrontation occurred between a man and police officers during a stop and search operation, after the officers pulled him over and began searching his vehicle without clearly stating a reason. The man questioned the officers, asking why his car was being searched. In response, one of the officers asked whether the police no longer had the authority to conduct vehicle searches. The man maintained that such actions should be based on a valid reason and that individuals cannot be searched arbitrarily. His insistence on due process appeared to catch the officers off guard, leaving them momentarily unable to provide a clear justification for the search.

A confrontation occurred between a man and police officers during a stop and search operation, after the officers pulled him over and began searching his vehicle without clearly stating a reason. The man questioned the officers, asking why his car was being searched. In response, one of the officers asked whether the police no longer had the authority to conduct vehicle searches. The man maintained that such actions should be based on a valid reason and that individuals cannot be searched arbitrarily. His insistence on due process appeared to catch the officers off guard, leaving them momentarily unable to provide a clear justification for the search.

TENIOLA

32,642 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: 1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. 2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. 3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. 4. Disorderly Conduct Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. 5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: 1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. 2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. 3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. 4. Disorderly Conduct Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. 5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

16,503 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A Chicago man named Terry Sturgis says a 10-year-old boy named Shawn Carter stayed with him for over 12 hours after Terry found him early one morning. Shawn had just gotten off a train on Chicago’s South Side around 4–5 a.m. with nothing but a jug of water in his bag and dirty clothes. Terry was out making his regular runs at the time. Shawn attends Scott Joplin school. Terry noticed scratches all over the boy’s neck and learned they were from beatings by his mother, Sapphire Carter. According to Shawn, the abuse happened because he wanted to play on the Xbox without asking first. Terry, who has survived child abuse himself and lost a brother to it, said he cried that day. He wanted to protect the boy, earn his trust, and show him that things could be okay. Terry gave Shawn his phone number before police arrived to take him. He’s now worried the boy is back in the same dangerous environment and hasn’t heard from him yet. Terry is asking people to help raise awareness about child abuse before it’s too late and is urging anyone who knows Shawn Carter’s family to reach out so the boy can get the help he desperately needs.

A Chicago man named Terry Sturgis says a 10-year-old boy named Shawn Carter stayed with him for over 12 hours after Terry found him early one morning. Shawn had just gotten off a train on Chicago’s South Side around 4–5 a.m. with nothing but a jug of water in his bag and dirty clothes. Terry was out making his regular runs at the time. Shawn attends Scott Joplin school. Terry noticed scratches all over the boy’s neck and learned they were from beatings by his mother, Sapphire Carter. According to Shawn, the abuse happened because he wanted to play on the Xbox without asking first. Terry, who has survived child abuse himself and lost a brother to it, said he cried that day. He wanted to protect the boy, earn his trust, and show him that things could be okay. Terry gave Shawn his phone number before police arrived to take him. He’s now worried the boy is back in the same dangerous environment and hasn’t heard from him yet. Terry is asking people to help raise awareness about child abuse before it’s too late and is urging anyone who knows Shawn Carter’s family to reach out so the boy can get the help he desperately needs.

LASHY BILLS

70,539 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This traffic stop was one bad decision away from being over in five minutes. Naturally, he chose the other option. A 20-year-old driver was pulled over for an excessively loud exhaust. Officers then spotted a nicotine vape and ordered him out of the pickup. He refused. Again. And again. He started recording, argued that officers couldn’t make him get out, and insisted he was staying put until a supervisor arrived. The problem? During a lawful traffic stop, police can order a driver out of the vehicle. After multiple warnings, the door opened — just not the way he wanted. He was arrested, and the final charge list included obstructing an officer, loud muffler, failure to display registration plates, illegal possession of alcohol by a minor, and a tobacco-possession violation.

This traffic stop was one bad decision away from being over in five minutes. Naturally, he chose the other option. A 20-year-old driver was pulled over for an excessively loud exhaust. Officers then spotted a nicotine vape and ordered him out of the pickup. He refused. Again. And again. He started recording, argued that officers couldn’t make him get out, and insisted he was staying put until a supervisor arrived. The problem? During a lawful traffic stop, police can order a driver out of the vehicle. After multiple warnings, the door opened — just not the way he wanted. He was arrested, and the final charge list included obstructing an officer, loud muffler, failure to display registration plates, illegal possession of alcohol by a minor, and a tobacco-possession violation.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

313,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Giggling Ganon

81,704 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸🇳🇬 NIGERIAN COUPLE KIDNAPS FEDERAL AGENT IN WILD ATTEMPT TO EVADE DEPORTATION IN MINNESOTA A Nigerian man allegedly overstaying his visa and his female accomplice trapped a Homeland Security agent inside their SUV, then drove him to a different police station as he screamed for help and pulled a gun. Oluwadamilola Bamigboye and Rekeya Frazier face federal charges after pushing agents out of the car, ignoring commands, and taking off, with one agent still inside fighting to stop the vehicle. The agent feared he was being abducted, had no idea where he was, and had to pull his weapon to try to stop the ride. This isn’t just resisting arrest, it’s full-blown abduction of a federal officer on American soil. Source: KSTP

🇺🇸🇳🇬 NIGERIAN COUPLE KIDNAPS FEDERAL AGENT IN WILD ATTEMPT TO EVADE DEPORTATION IN MINNESOTA A Nigerian man allegedly overstaying his visa and his female accomplice trapped a Homeland Security agent inside their SUV, then drove him to a different police station as he screamed for help and pulled a gun. Oluwadamilola Bamigboye and Rekeya Frazier face federal charges after pushing agents out of the car, ignoring commands, and taking off, with one agent still inside fighting to stop the vehicle. The agent feared he was being abducted, had no idea where he was, and had to pull his weapon to try to stop the ride. This isn’t just resisting arrest, it’s full-blown abduction of a federal officer on American soil. Source: KSTP

Mario Nawfal

389,078 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten