Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"USDA Approves Double Stranded RNA Genetically Modified Potatoes & Apples." Jeffrey Smith "It Has Been Proven In Peer Reviewed Studies That Double Stranded RNA Reprograms & Silences DNA." "In Spite Of All The Dangerous & Damning Evidence, The USDA Has Allowed It On The Market." The mechanism in food...

ValerieAnne1970's profile picture

Valerie Anne Smith

269,872 subscribers

335,649 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Big Agriculture is rolling out RNA spray technology on common food crops without long-term studies on health or environmental impacts developed by agrochemical companies IT’S ALREADY BEING SPRAYED ON FOOD IN AMERICA RIGHT NOW Here's a list of crops that could be sprayed with RNA interference ricul (RNAi) sprays to control pests or disease (currently in development and going through testing) - Corn - for Western corn rootworm - Potatoes - for Colorado potato beetle - Tomatoes - to prevent gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) - Grapes - for viral infections like fanleaf virus - Strawberries - for fungal and insect control - Wheat & Barley - To fight Fusarium and powderymildew - Berries - including blueberries and raspberries - Lettuce & Leafy Greens - for aphid and virus resistance (in trials) Being sprayed right now in America: The first RNAi-based biopesticide, “Ledprona” (commercial name “Calantha”), targeting the Colorado potato beetle on potatoes and is being sprayed right now in America These are gene slicing RNA sprays to change the genetic makeup of the plant, and then we as Americans will be eating it
0:47

Big Agriculture is rolling out RNA spray technology on common food crops without long-term studies on health or environmental impacts developed by agrochemical companies IT’S ALREADY BEING SPRAYED ON FOOD IN AMERICA RIGHT NOW Here's a list of crops that could be sprayed with RNA interference ricul (RNAi) sprays to control pests or disease (currently in development and going through testing) - Corn - for Western corn rootworm - Potatoes - for Colorado potato beetle - Tomatoes - to prevent gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) - Grapes - for viral infections like fanleaf virus - Strawberries - for fungal and insect control - Wheat & Barley - To fight Fusarium and powderymildew - Berries - including blueberries and raspberries - Lettuce & Leafy Greens - for aphid and virus resistance (in trials) Being sprayed right now in America: The first RNAi-based biopesticide, “Ledprona” (commercial name “Calantha”), targeting the Colorado potato beetle on potatoes and is being sprayed right now in America These are gene slicing RNA sprays to change the genetic makeup of the plant, and then we as Americans will be eating it

Wall Street Apes

104,924 views • 1 year ago

Because Of Pfizer, 90% Of US Cheese Is Made Using GMO Corn & Black Mold, CRISPR Cow Gene Editing. This Bioengineered Rennet Requires No Special Labeling & No Ingredient Disclosure. A. Niger Black Mold Is A Severe Allergen & The Only 'Safety Study' Was Done On Rats For 90 Days. Traditional cheese manufacturing, using animal rennet, accounts for less than 10% of cheese in the United States as of 2025. Pfizer created genetically modified FPC, which is Fermentation Produced Chymosin as a cheap rennet for cheese production. GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow or camel gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. In 1990, the US FDA, going off of the prior US Supreme Court decision to allow 'new life forms to be patented', granted approval for the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC. This bioengineered FPC was granted GRAS status. This means that Pfizer was exempt from pre-market review & safety testing. GRAS Generally Recognized As Safe substances do not require approval or notification to the US FDA prior to marketing. Pfizer sold the rights to the patented formula in 1996 to several companies who use the same 'recipe' of CRISPR gene editing & bioengineered fermentation of A. Niger black mold & GMO corn, inserted into cow or camel genes. One of the largest is Christian Hansen who Makes Chy-Max & has merged with a biotech pharmaceutical company Novozymes Novonesis to be the leading producer of US GMO FPC cheese rennet, accounting for more than 90% of US cheese. The only 'safety study' was done by the European Union in 2022, using rats injected with GMO FPC Fermentation Produced Chymosin rennet, while monitoring the rats behavior for only 90 days. Because of US FDA lack of labeling laws...this GMO black mold FPC CRISPR gene edited rennet can be in the ingredient list as: Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet Basically, it can be labeled as anything, the US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. Besides the fact that this is a dangerous genetically modified product in our food...Aspergillus Niger black mold is classified as a severe allergen. Many people have very strong illness reactions to it, as it is also used in the making of citric acid & ascorbic acid. Allergic & illness symptoms occur very frequently citing headache, allergic rhinitis, GI distress, gut permeability, diarrhea & other inflammatory responses that are mistakenly assumed to be dairy intolerance, when in fact, it is a reaction to the A. Niger FPC GMO rennet. Small amounts of A. Niger cytokine proteins into our bodies on a regular basis, elicit a low grade immune response. With the repetitive exposure & insult, the immune system maintains a low grade inflammatory response. Over time, the chronic inflammatory state will build & impact various systems in the body. 2 Ways To Avoid GMO FPC CRISPR Cheese Rennet: 1⃣ Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making procedures using ANIMAL RENNET in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. Animal rennet is safe. 2⃣ Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict adherence laws & forbids any genetically modified or bioengineered ingredients within the certified organic realm of products. There will be not be any cheese labeled 'US Certified Organic' that contains the GMO fermented A. Niger black mold, cow gene edited FPC rennet. Certified Organic is safe. 👇CRISPR Technology In Dairy Industry👇 👇EU Study: FPC Rennet On Rats For 90 Days👇 👇Recombinant DNA Food Enzymes Cause Allergy👇 Video Credit: Dennis Echelbarger
1:25

Because Of Pfizer, 90% Of US Cheese Is Made Using GMO Corn & Black Mold, CRISPR Cow Gene Editing. This Bioengineered Rennet Requires No Special Labeling & No Ingredient Disclosure. A. Niger Black Mold Is A Severe Allergen & The Only 'Safety Study' Was Done On Rats For 90 Days. Traditional cheese manufacturing, using animal rennet, accounts for less than 10% of cheese in the United States as of 2025. Pfizer created genetically modified FPC, which is Fermentation Produced Chymosin as a cheap rennet for cheese production. GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow or camel gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. In 1990, the US FDA, going off of the prior US Supreme Court decision to allow 'new life forms to be patented', granted approval for the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC. This bioengineered FPC was granted GRAS status. This means that Pfizer was exempt from pre-market review & safety testing. GRAS Generally Recognized As Safe substances do not require approval or notification to the US FDA prior to marketing. Pfizer sold the rights to the patented formula in 1996 to several companies who use the same 'recipe' of CRISPR gene editing & bioengineered fermentation of A. Niger black mold & GMO corn, inserted into cow or camel genes. One of the largest is Christian Hansen who Makes Chy-Max & has merged with a biotech pharmaceutical company Novozymes Novonesis to be the leading producer of US GMO FPC cheese rennet, accounting for more than 90% of US cheese. The only 'safety study' was done by the European Union in 2022, using rats injected with GMO FPC Fermentation Produced Chymosin rennet, while monitoring the rats behavior for only 90 days. Because of US FDA lack of labeling laws...this GMO black mold FPC CRISPR gene edited rennet can be in the ingredient list as: Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet Basically, it can be labeled as anything, the US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. Besides the fact that this is a dangerous genetically modified product in our food...Aspergillus Niger black mold is classified as a severe allergen. Many people have very strong illness reactions to it, as it is also used in the making of citric acid & ascorbic acid. Allergic & illness symptoms occur very frequently citing headache, allergic rhinitis, GI distress, gut permeability, diarrhea & other inflammatory responses that are mistakenly assumed to be dairy intolerance, when in fact, it is a reaction to the A. Niger FPC GMO rennet. Small amounts of A. Niger cytokine proteins into our bodies on a regular basis, elicit a low grade immune response. With the repetitive exposure & insult, the immune system maintains a low grade inflammatory response. Over time, the chronic inflammatory state will build & impact various systems in the body. 2 Ways To Avoid GMO FPC CRISPR Cheese Rennet: 1⃣ Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making procedures using ANIMAL RENNET in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. Animal rennet is safe. 2⃣ Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict adherence laws & forbids any genetically modified or bioengineered ingredients within the certified organic realm of products. There will be not be any cheese labeled 'US Certified Organic' that contains the GMO fermented A. Niger black mold, cow gene edited FPC rennet. Certified Organic is safe. 👇CRISPR Technology In Dairy Industry👇 👇EU Study: FPC Rennet On Rats For 90 Days👇 👇Recombinant DNA Food Enzymes Cause Allergy👇 Video Credit: Dennis Echelbarger

Valerie Anne Smith

217,959 views • 1 year ago

90% Of The Cheese In The US Has An Ingredient Invented By Pfizer. This Bioengineered Synthetic Rennet Uses GMO Corn, Black Mold & CRISPR Gene Editing. The Only Safety Test Was A 'Rat Safety Study' For 90 Days. The US FDA Requires No Ingredient Disclosure & No Special Labeling. Traditional cheese manufacturing always used rennet from animal sources, but less than 10% of cheese in the US is still made with an animal rennet. In 1990, the US FDA granted Pfizer the approval & patent of the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product...GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC (Fermentation Produced Chymosin). Synthetic Chymosin Manufacturing Process... GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. Approval & Safety Are Sorely Lacking... This bioengineered FPC was granted GRAS status using manufacturer self reporting. This means that Pfizer was exempt from pre-market review & safety testing. GRAS Generally Recognized As Safe substances do not require approval or notification to the US FDA prior to marketing. The only 'safety study' was done by the European Union in 2022, using rats injected with GMO FPC Fermentation Produced Chymosin rennet, while monitoring the rats behavior for only 90 days. US FDA Lack Of Labeling Laws & What Wording To Look For On Ingredient Labels... Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet *⃣ It can basically be labeled as anything. The US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. Allergies To A. Niger Black Mold Mimiks Dairy Intolerance Symptoms... Intolerance symptoms occur very frequently including headache, allergic rhinitis, congestion, excess mucus production, itchy throat, GI distress, gut permeability, diarrhea & other inflammatory responses that are mistakenly assumed to be dairy intolerance, when in fact, it is a reaction to the A. Niger FPC GMO rennet. How To Avoid Cheese With Synthetic Chymosin FPC Rennet... 🔵Purchase cheese made using Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making processes using animal rennet in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. 🔵Purchase cheese that is Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict laws & forbids GMO or bioengineered ingredients. All certified organic will not contain synthetic FPC Chymosin. 🔵Purchase Imported Cheese With Safe Labeling: Look for PDO Protected Designation of Origin sticker. Video Credit & Cited Research Sources Linked In Replies...
1:41

90% Of The Cheese In The US Has An Ingredient Invented By Pfizer. This Bioengineered Synthetic Rennet Uses GMO Corn, Black Mold & CRISPR Gene Editing. The Only Safety Test Was A 'Rat Safety Study' For 90 Days. The US FDA Requires No Ingredient Disclosure & No Special Labeling. Traditional cheese manufacturing always used rennet from animal sources, but less than 10% of cheese in the US is still made with an animal rennet. In 1990, the US FDA granted Pfizer the approval & patent of the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product...GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC (Fermentation Produced Chymosin). Synthetic Chymosin Manufacturing Process... GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. Approval & Safety Are Sorely Lacking... This bioengineered FPC was granted GRAS status using manufacturer self reporting. This means that Pfizer was exempt from pre-market review & safety testing. GRAS Generally Recognized As Safe substances do not require approval or notification to the US FDA prior to marketing. The only 'safety study' was done by the European Union in 2022, using rats injected with GMO FPC Fermentation Produced Chymosin rennet, while monitoring the rats behavior for only 90 days. US FDA Lack Of Labeling Laws & What Wording To Look For On Ingredient Labels... Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet *⃣ It can basically be labeled as anything. The US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. Allergies To A. Niger Black Mold Mimiks Dairy Intolerance Symptoms... Intolerance symptoms occur very frequently including headache, allergic rhinitis, congestion, excess mucus production, itchy throat, GI distress, gut permeability, diarrhea & other inflammatory responses that are mistakenly assumed to be dairy intolerance, when in fact, it is a reaction to the A. Niger FPC GMO rennet. How To Avoid Cheese With Synthetic Chymosin FPC Rennet... 🔵Purchase cheese made using Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making processes using animal rennet in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. 🔵Purchase cheese that is Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict laws & forbids GMO or bioengineered ingredients. All certified organic will not contain synthetic FPC Chymosin. 🔵Purchase Imported Cheese With Safe Labeling: Look for PDO Protected Designation of Origin sticker. Video Credit & Cited Research Sources Linked In Replies...

Valerie Anne Smith

179,459 views • 9 months ago

90% of the cheese in the U.S. has an ingredient invented by Pfizer. This bioengineered synthetic rennet uses GMO Corn, Black Mold & CRISPR Gene Editing. The only safety study was done on rats for 90 days. The U.S. FDA requires no ingredient disclosure & no special labeling... In 1990, the US FDA granted Pfizer the approval & patent of the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product...GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC (Fermentation Produced Chymosin). Synthetic Chymosin Manufacturing Process... GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. US FDA Lack Of Labeling Laws & What Wording To Look For On Ingredient Labels... Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet *⃣ It can basically be labeled as anything. The US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. How To Avoid Cheese With Synthetic Chymosin FPC Rennet... 🔵Purchase cheese made using Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making processes using animal rennet in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. 🔵Purchase cheese that is Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict laws & forbids GMO or bioengineered ingredients. All certified organic will not contain synthetic FPC Chymosin. 🔵Purchase imported cheese: Look for PDO Protected Designation of Origin sticker.
1:42

90% of the cheese in the U.S. has an ingredient invented by Pfizer. This bioengineered synthetic rennet uses GMO Corn, Black Mold & CRISPR Gene Editing. The only safety study was done on rats for 90 days. The U.S. FDA requires no ingredient disclosure & no special labeling... In 1990, the US FDA granted Pfizer the approval & patent of the very 1st CRISPR gene edited GMO bioengineered product...GMO microbial Chymosin rennet FPC (Fermentation Produced Chymosin). Synthetic Chymosin Manufacturing Process... GMO corn is fermented in large tanks using Aspergillus Niger black mold, which is then inserted into a cow gene using bioengineered CRISPR gene editing, resulting in a GMO synthetic chymosin rennet FPC. US FDA Lack Of Labeling Laws & What Wording To Look For On Ingredient Labels... Microbial Rennet Vegetable Rennet Chymosin Rennet FPC Rennet Fermentation Rennet Proprietary Fermented Rennet Microbial Enzymes Fermentation Produced Rennet *⃣ It can basically be labeled as anything. The US FDA does not require cheese manufacturers to declare the source of their rennet. Even Kosher & Halal use FPC Chymosin in their labeled cheese products. How To Avoid Cheese With Synthetic Chymosin FPC Rennet... 🔵Purchase cheese made using Animal Rennet: Seek out grocery store brands that list ANIMAL RENNET in the ingredient list. Purchase from local farmers & farmer's markets who use traditional cheese making processes using animal rennet in their aged, raw & A2 cheeses. 🔵Purchase cheese that is Certified Organic: US Certified Organic has strict laws & forbids GMO or bioengineered ingredients. All certified organic will not contain synthetic FPC Chymosin. 🔵Purchase imported cheese: Look for PDO Protected Designation of Origin sticker.

Valerie Anne Smith

97,108 views • 4 months ago

Up To 90% Of The Cheese Sold In America Is No Longer Made Naturally “90% of the cheese sold in the U.S. does not use animal rennet and instead uses a genetically modified organism (GMO) version made by Pfizer” They use a loophole to get around having to label all our cheese as GMO, Here’s how: “90% of US cheese has now been infiltrated by one of the world's largest biopharmaceutical companies, Pfizer, and it has GMO's.” Traditionally, cheese is made with just 4 ingredients, milk, salt, starter culture, and animal rennet, which is a clotting agent that's used to curdle milk into cheese. Today, there are 4 different kinds of rennet used in the cheese industry, and reports are stating that the most commonly used kind is a genetically modified version called FPC, or a fermentation produced chymosin made by Pfizer. These alternative rennets are both cheaper to use and speed up the aging process, which like always means greater profits. The crazy part is no one knows that they're eating this or how it's really affecting us. Because this FBC rennet is labeled as GRAS or generally recognized as safe, it creates a loophole that exempt Pfizer or other companies from having to label these products as GMO. And due to Pfizer's massive amount of wealth and power, it's now made its way into about 90% of our cheese. But how is this affecting us? Because this is newer technology, we don't yet know for sure, but there has been a number of researchers addressing concern. After all, the only unbiased safety study used to approve these FPCs was evaluated by the short term 90 day trial in rats. However, researchers are concerned about its toxicity or the biotoxins from GMOs as well as digestive issues for humans as these renin alternatives can serve as an allergen. While I'd love to present you with a list of cheeses to avoid as well as the ones that are safe, there's just way too many cheeses out there. So if you can, look for the kind of rennet or enzyme used in the cheese. I would seek out animal or traditional rennets first, then potentially some vegetable rennets, and I'd avoid cheeses containing any microbial or genetically modified rennets altogether.” —- More info: This bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status. Meaning, Pfizer was exempt from the pre approval requirements that apply to other (non GRAS) new food additives. Since Pfizer demonstrated what is often referred to as “substantial equivalence”, the FDA concluded that bioengineered chymosin was substantially equivalent to calf rennet and needed neither special labeling nor indication of its source or method of production. In case you didn’t know, this ‘GRAS’ label is a little hand wavy and just a big loophole… In general, federal law requires the FDA to ensure that food additives are safe and mandates a rigorous pre-market safety review process. But the loophole = GRAS. 43% of food additives are designated ‘GRAS’ and don't get FDA oversight. Essentially, we must trust that food companies will conduct unbiased safety determinations before adding these new GRAS substances to our food. “According to the FDC Act, food additives that are non-GRAS need approval prior to marketing. In contrast, GRAS substances do not require approval or notification to the USFDA prior to marketing.” Meaning the public and other regulatory agencies lack the data needed to assess the safety of some chemicals in our foods.
1:25

Up To 90% Of The Cheese Sold In America Is No Longer Made Naturally “90% of the cheese sold in the U.S. does not use animal rennet and instead uses a genetically modified organism (GMO) version made by Pfizer” They use a loophole to get around having to label all our cheese as GMO, Here’s how: “90% of US cheese has now been infiltrated by one of the world's largest biopharmaceutical companies, Pfizer, and it has GMO's.” Traditionally, cheese is made with just 4 ingredients, milk, salt, starter culture, and animal rennet, which is a clotting agent that's used to curdle milk into cheese. Today, there are 4 different kinds of rennet used in the cheese industry, and reports are stating that the most commonly used kind is a genetically modified version called FPC, or a fermentation produced chymosin made by Pfizer. These alternative rennets are both cheaper to use and speed up the aging process, which like always means greater profits. The crazy part is no one knows that they're eating this or how it's really affecting us. Because this FBC rennet is labeled as GRAS or generally recognized as safe, it creates a loophole that exempt Pfizer or other companies from having to label these products as GMO. And due to Pfizer's massive amount of wealth and power, it's now made its way into about 90% of our cheese. But how is this affecting us? Because this is newer technology, we don't yet know for sure, but there has been a number of researchers addressing concern. After all, the only unbiased safety study used to approve these FPCs was evaluated by the short term 90 day trial in rats. However, researchers are concerned about its toxicity or the biotoxins from GMOs as well as digestive issues for humans as these renin alternatives can serve as an allergen. While I'd love to present you with a list of cheeses to avoid as well as the ones that are safe, there's just way too many cheeses out there. So if you can, look for the kind of rennet or enzyme used in the cheese. I would seek out animal or traditional rennets first, then potentially some vegetable rennets, and I'd avoid cheeses containing any microbial or genetically modified rennets altogether.” —- More info: This bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status. Meaning, Pfizer was exempt from the pre approval requirements that apply to other (non GRAS) new food additives. Since Pfizer demonstrated what is often referred to as “substantial equivalence”, the FDA concluded that bioengineered chymosin was substantially equivalent to calf rennet and needed neither special labeling nor indication of its source or method of production. In case you didn’t know, this ‘GRAS’ label is a little hand wavy and just a big loophole… In general, federal law requires the FDA to ensure that food additives are safe and mandates a rigorous pre-market safety review process. But the loophole = GRAS. 43% of food additives are designated ‘GRAS’ and don't get FDA oversight. Essentially, we must trust that food companies will conduct unbiased safety determinations before adding these new GRAS substances to our food. “According to the FDC Act, food additives that are non-GRAS need approval prior to marketing. In contrast, GRAS substances do not require approval or notification to the USFDA prior to marketing.” Meaning the public and other regulatory agencies lack the data needed to assess the safety of some chemicals in our foods.

Wall Street Apes

1,034,540 views • 2 years ago

"mRNA Vaccines Were Injected Into Milk Bubbles & Fed To Mice...Within 3 Feedings The Mice Were Fully Vaccinated." Dr Peter McCullough "This Proves That Messenger RNA Crosses The GI Tract." "The USDA Has An Entire Array Of Genetic Vaccines That They Are Developing With Merck." Merck Animal Health vaccines & related developments: Companion animals Canine Influenza: Merck has developed & received USDA approval for the NOBIVAC NXT Canine Flu H3N2 vaccine, which uses RNA-particle self replicating spray technology to protect dogs against canine influenza. Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV): The USDA also approved the NOBIVAC NXT FeLV vaccine, which utilizes the same RNA-particle self replicating spray technology as the canine influenza vaccine. This is toxic for your family pets & you *⃣ when your pet sneezes or gets saliva on you, you receive the vaccine too, thru shedding. Livestock Cattle: Merck offers a range of vaccines for cattle under the BOVILIS name, including enteric disease caused by bovine coronavirus (BOVILIS CORONAVIRUS). Swine: Merck's acquired company, Harrisvaccines, received USDA licensure for its RNA Particle (RP) vaccine platform, allowing for the manufacturing of herd-specific, custom vaccines for various diseases including those impacting swine. Poultry: Merck Animal Health partnered with Cambridge Technologies to be the exclusive sales agent for their autogenous poultry vaccines, including an experimental vaccine for avian metapneumovirus type B, which received USDA approval for manufacturing & sale. This is toxic for livestock & to you *⃣ you will be consuming the self replicating RNA spike protein. Bayer Monsanto Food Crops Big Ag & Bayer/Monsanto are rolling out RNA spray technology on common food crops — without long term studies on health or environmental impacts. Here's a list of crops that could be sprayed with mRNA interference (RNAi) sprays👇🏽 Potatoes Tomatoes Corn Cabbage Cotton Papaya Peas Cucumber Grapes Strawberries Zucchini Soybeans Wheat Chickpeas Rice Barley Lettuce Spinach These will be toxic to vegetables, fruit, our soil & to you *⃣ you will be consuming self replicating RNA spike protein. No mandatory labeling will be required for crops treated with mRNA sprays in the US. 👇Exosome mRNA Vaccine Fed To Mice In Milk👇 👇USDA Approves Merck Spray Family Pet Vaccine👇 👇Expanding Edible Plant Based Vaccines👇 Speaker: Dr Peter McCullough, MD Video: @toxins_in_children
1:30

"mRNA Vaccines Were Injected Into Milk Bubbles & Fed To Mice...Within 3 Feedings The Mice Were Fully Vaccinated." Dr Peter McCullough "This Proves That Messenger RNA Crosses The GI Tract." "The USDA Has An Entire Array Of Genetic Vaccines That They Are Developing With Merck." Merck Animal Health vaccines & related developments: Companion animals Canine Influenza: Merck has developed & received USDA approval for the NOBIVAC NXT Canine Flu H3N2 vaccine, which uses RNA-particle self replicating spray technology to protect dogs against canine influenza. Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV): The USDA also approved the NOBIVAC NXT FeLV vaccine, which utilizes the same RNA-particle self replicating spray technology as the canine influenza vaccine. This is toxic for your family pets & you *⃣ when your pet sneezes or gets saliva on you, you receive the vaccine too, thru shedding. Livestock Cattle: Merck offers a range of vaccines for cattle under the BOVILIS name, including enteric disease caused by bovine coronavirus (BOVILIS CORONAVIRUS). Swine: Merck's acquired company, Harrisvaccines, received USDA licensure for its RNA Particle (RP) vaccine platform, allowing for the manufacturing of herd-specific, custom vaccines for various diseases including those impacting swine. Poultry: Merck Animal Health partnered with Cambridge Technologies to be the exclusive sales agent for their autogenous poultry vaccines, including an experimental vaccine for avian metapneumovirus type B, which received USDA approval for manufacturing & sale. This is toxic for livestock & to you *⃣ you will be consuming the self replicating RNA spike protein. Bayer Monsanto Food Crops Big Ag & Bayer/Monsanto are rolling out RNA spray technology on common food crops — without long term studies on health or environmental impacts. Here's a list of crops that could be sprayed with mRNA interference (RNAi) sprays👇🏽 Potatoes Tomatoes Corn Cabbage Cotton Papaya Peas Cucumber Grapes Strawberries Zucchini Soybeans Wheat Chickpeas Rice Barley Lettuce Spinach These will be toxic to vegetables, fruit, our soil & to you *⃣ you will be consuming self replicating RNA spike protein. No mandatory labeling will be required for crops treated with mRNA sprays in the US. 👇Exosome mRNA Vaccine Fed To Mice In Milk👇 👇USDA Approves Merck Spray Family Pet Vaccine👇 👇Expanding Edible Plant Based Vaccines👇 Speaker: Dr Peter McCullough, MD Video: @toxins_in_children

Valerie Anne Smith

102,870 views • 1 year ago

Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Were Released In Florida By Biotech Oxitec, Funded By Bill Gates, For The Purpose Of Ending Malaria. The Mosquitoes Were Released In The Florida Keys, Where There Was No Malaria. Now, For The First Time In 20 yrs, We Have Malaria In Florida. GMO Free USA & the Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes lost their battle to stop the Bill Gates funded company Oxitec from releasing the mosquitoes. The EPA gave the green light of approval to release 2.4 million of the genetically modified mosquitoes in areas where there was no malaria, for the purpose of eradicating disease. Florida residents were outraged. Oxitec failed to provide sufficient answers to the most pressing questions posed by concerned residents. Oxitec claimed that the GMO mosquito experiments would be monitored by the CDC. But, the CDC has stated, “CDC is not formally involved in any evaluation at this time. CDC is not overseeing the trial, and CDC does not plan to conduct any health assessments before, during, or after the trials.” Barry Wray, Executive Director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition: “What people should realize is that this is not just a Florida Keys issue. It’s a national issue,” Wray continued, “I truly believe we are fighting one of the most consequential regulatory malfunctions we could ever imagine. We all watched as four experts in the biotech field, each enthusiastic about the technology Oxitec had created and each wise enough to say that without proper scientific rigor and prudence, we risk unnecessary outcomes and mistakes. The problem is that the discovery of those mistakes and consequences may not be realized until damages are more severe and irreversible. All of this risk, that benefits a for-profit company getting to market quicker with a product that has yet to actually prove anything other than failure in all of its historical field trials.” 👇Oxitec Florida Keys Mosquito Project👇 👇Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes👇 👇GMO Mosquitoes Released In Florida👇 Speaker: Kash Khan
0:41

Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Were Released In Florida By Biotech Oxitec, Funded By Bill Gates, For The Purpose Of Ending Malaria. The Mosquitoes Were Released In The Florida Keys, Where There Was No Malaria. Now, For The First Time In 20 yrs, We Have Malaria In Florida. GMO Free USA & the Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes lost their battle to stop the Bill Gates funded company Oxitec from releasing the mosquitoes. The EPA gave the green light of approval to release 2.4 million of the genetically modified mosquitoes in areas where there was no malaria, for the purpose of eradicating disease. Florida residents were outraged. Oxitec failed to provide sufficient answers to the most pressing questions posed by concerned residents. Oxitec claimed that the GMO mosquito experiments would be monitored by the CDC. But, the CDC has stated, “CDC is not formally involved in any evaluation at this time. CDC is not overseeing the trial, and CDC does not plan to conduct any health assessments before, during, or after the trials.” Barry Wray, Executive Director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition: “What people should realize is that this is not just a Florida Keys issue. It’s a national issue,” Wray continued, “I truly believe we are fighting one of the most consequential regulatory malfunctions we could ever imagine. We all watched as four experts in the biotech field, each enthusiastic about the technology Oxitec had created and each wise enough to say that without proper scientific rigor and prudence, we risk unnecessary outcomes and mistakes. The problem is that the discovery of those mistakes and consequences may not be realized until damages are more severe and irreversible. All of this risk, that benefits a for-profit company getting to market quicker with a product that has yet to actually prove anything other than failure in all of its historical field trials.” 👇Oxitec Florida Keys Mosquito Project👇 👇Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes👇 👇GMO Mosquitoes Released In Florida👇 Speaker: Kash Khan

Valerie Anne Smith

154,968 views • 1 year ago

Did you know? In a quiet revolution hitting US farms right now, RNA-based sprays—nature's own gene-silencing tech—are stepping in as a precision tool against crop-destroying pests. But with approvals accelerating and no labels required, are we ready for this shift in how our food is grown? As of late 2024, the EPA has greenlit the world's first commercial RNA spray: Ledprona (branded as Calantha® by GreenLight Biosciences), a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) product that targets the Colorado potato beetle on potatoes. This biopesticide uses RNA interference (RNAi)—a natural process plants and animals employ to fend off threats—silencing a key pest gene without altering the crop's DNA. It's already rolling out on potato fields in states like Idaho, Colorado, and Wisconsin, with EPA confirming no human health or environmental risks after rigorous review, including no impacts on endangered species. This isn't a one-off. RNAi tech is expanding fast, backed by giants like Bayer, Syngenta, Corteva, and BASF, plus innovators such as RNAissance Ag and GreenLight. While Ledprona leads for potatoes, trials and filings are underway for broader use. Here's a verified list of 16 key crops where RNAi sprays are approved (like Ledprona on potatoes), in commercial trials, or late-stage regulatory review for pest/disease control—drawn from EPA dockets, company announcements, and peer-reviewed studies as of December 2025: • Potatoes: Approved for Colorado potato beetle via Ledprona; commercial use on US farms in 2025. • Tomatoes: Late-stage trials for tomato leafminer and viral resistance; Bayer/Syngenta pilots • Corn (maize): Corteva's Vorceed™ Enlist® combines RNAi for rootworm; spray trials expanding to foliar pests. • Cabbage: GreenLight trials targeting diamondback moth; regulatory filings pending. • Cotton: Bollworm RNAi sprays in field tests by BASF; cottonseed oil variants approved. • Papaya: Virus-resistant RNAi sprays commercialized; ongoing for ringspot virus. • Peas: Trials for pea aphid control via RNAissance Ag; late-stage EPA review. • Cucumber: Zucchini yellow mosaic virus sprays approved in trials; cucurbit focus. • Grapes: Botrytis cinerea RNAi for gray mold; Syngenta vineyard pilots. • Strawberries: Gray mold and aphid trials; GreenLight field data supports 2025 rollout. • Zucchinis: Viral mosaic resistance sprays; paired with cucumber approvals. • Soybeans: Corteva/Bayer rootworm and aphid RNAi; commercial hybrids with spray boosters. • Wheat: Fusarium head blight dsRNA trials; BASF wheat pilots. • Chickpeas: Aphid and pod borer RNAi; RNAissance late-stage for pulses. • Rice: Brown planthopper and viral sprays; international trials eyeing US import alignment. • Barley: Fusarium and aphid RNAi; paired with wheat approvals. These aren't GMOs—the RNA degrades quickly (often within days), leaving no residues, and targets pests with laser focus, sparing bees and soil life. EPA's fast-track under biopesticide rules skips some chemical hurdles, as short-term studies show no toxicity to humans or mammals—RNA breaks down in digestion. But long-term data? Still emerging; experts call for lifecycle monitoring on non-targets like soil microbes. In the US, no mandatory labels for RNAi-treated foods—it's not "transgenic," so no GMO tag. Eat your fries or salsa without knowing? That's the norm. Meanwhile, EU folks: Watch the CRISPR/NGT regs—companies are pushing exemptions here too, potentially fast-tracking similar sprays amid lobbying for sustainability wins. Backed by USDA research and private innovation (no Gates Foundation ties here—debunked rumors aside), this could cut chemical use 50% by 2030. Game-changer for climate-resilient farming? Or need more transparency? Check the 47-sec investor clip below—straight from a GreenLight call on "spray-and-grow" RNAi. What’s your take: Innovation win or label it all? Drop thoughts below. Sources: EPA dockets, peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Environ Sci Technol, Front Plant Sci), company filings.
0:47

Did you know? In a quiet revolution hitting US farms right now, RNA-based sprays—nature's own gene-silencing tech—are stepping in as a precision tool against crop-destroying pests. But with approvals accelerating and no labels required, are we ready for this shift in how our food is grown? As of late 2024, the EPA has greenlit the world's first commercial RNA spray: Ledprona (branded as Calantha® by GreenLight Biosciences), a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) product that targets the Colorado potato beetle on potatoes. This biopesticide uses RNA interference (RNAi)—a natural process plants and animals employ to fend off threats—silencing a key pest gene without altering the crop's DNA. It's already rolling out on potato fields in states like Idaho, Colorado, and Wisconsin, with EPA confirming no human health or environmental risks after rigorous review, including no impacts on endangered species. This isn't a one-off. RNAi tech is expanding fast, backed by giants like Bayer, Syngenta, Corteva, and BASF, plus innovators such as RNAissance Ag and GreenLight. While Ledprona leads for potatoes, trials and filings are underway for broader use. Here's a verified list of 16 key crops where RNAi sprays are approved (like Ledprona on potatoes), in commercial trials, or late-stage regulatory review for pest/disease control—drawn from EPA dockets, company announcements, and peer-reviewed studies as of December 2025: • Potatoes: Approved for Colorado potato beetle via Ledprona; commercial use on US farms in 2025. • Tomatoes: Late-stage trials for tomato leafminer and viral resistance; Bayer/Syngenta pilots • Corn (maize): Corteva's Vorceed™ Enlist® combines RNAi for rootworm; spray trials expanding to foliar pests. • Cabbage: GreenLight trials targeting diamondback moth; regulatory filings pending. • Cotton: Bollworm RNAi sprays in field tests by BASF; cottonseed oil variants approved. • Papaya: Virus-resistant RNAi sprays commercialized; ongoing for ringspot virus. • Peas: Trials for pea aphid control via RNAissance Ag; late-stage EPA review. • Cucumber: Zucchini yellow mosaic virus sprays approved in trials; cucurbit focus. • Grapes: Botrytis cinerea RNAi for gray mold; Syngenta vineyard pilots. • Strawberries: Gray mold and aphid trials; GreenLight field data supports 2025 rollout. • Zucchinis: Viral mosaic resistance sprays; paired with cucumber approvals. • Soybeans: Corteva/Bayer rootworm and aphid RNAi; commercial hybrids with spray boosters. • Wheat: Fusarium head blight dsRNA trials; BASF wheat pilots. • Chickpeas: Aphid and pod borer RNAi; RNAissance late-stage for pulses. • Rice: Brown planthopper and viral sprays; international trials eyeing US import alignment. • Barley: Fusarium and aphid RNAi; paired with wheat approvals. These aren't GMOs—the RNA degrades quickly (often within days), leaving no residues, and targets pests with laser focus, sparing bees and soil life. EPA's fast-track under biopesticide rules skips some chemical hurdles, as short-term studies show no toxicity to humans or mammals—RNA breaks down in digestion. But long-term data? Still emerging; experts call for lifecycle monitoring on non-targets like soil microbes. In the US, no mandatory labels for RNAi-treated foods—it's not "transgenic," so no GMO tag. Eat your fries or salsa without knowing? That's the norm. Meanwhile, EU folks: Watch the CRISPR/NGT regs—companies are pushing exemptions here too, potentially fast-tracking similar sprays amid lobbying for sustainability wins. Backed by USDA research and private innovation (no Gates Foundation ties here—debunked rumors aside), this could cut chemical use 50% by 2030. Game-changer for climate-resilient farming? Or need more transparency? Check the 47-sec investor clip below—straight from a GreenLight call on "spray-and-grow" RNAi. What’s your take: Innovation win or label it all? Drop thoughts below. Sources: EPA dockets, peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Environ Sci Technol, Front Plant Sci), company filings.

Camus

12,127 views • 8 months ago

THEY LIED AND CONTINUE TO LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING - and now they are trying to cover it up. The Pfizer & Moderna Covid "vaccines" are gene therapies. This is not some type of "conspiracy theory" - it’s an admitted fact. And now they are trying to cover it up. As under Australia’s Gene Technology Act 2000 if you are importing GMO into Australia you need a licence and approval from the Office of Gene Technology - but this never happened for the Covid injections. Further, part of the propaganda to trick the world to line up to get injected, was to misled people into believing that these Covid injections were just like traditional vaccines and therefore could be trusted - rather than tell the truth that they were a new novel technology, a form of gene therapy. So they lied. And the regulator was either asleep at the wheel, or part of dishonest cultural of our health bureaucracies that are more concerned about protecting the vested interests of Big Pharma than they are of protecting the public. Dr Julian Fidge BPharm, MBBS, FRACGP, MMed was posted these comments; Indeed, Dr Bhula must resign. I am absolutely convinced that everything she said was wrong, and that she deliberately misled the Senate. She does not seem to be telling the truth when she says that Pfizer doesn't need a licence because the vaccine is not manufactured in Australia. There is no basis for saying that. To to make and import a GMO definitely requires a licence. There is not mention of any exemption for production of the GMO overseas. Dr Bhula is also being completely irrational, saying that anyone can import any gene therapy into Australia, and do what they want with it, including mandating that it be injected into humans, as long as it is not manufactured here, without any oversight by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator. That does not make any sense at all. I can't find any mention in the Gene Technology Act where it says or implies that a person is exempt from getting a licence if the GMO is manufactured outside of Australia. I think that Dr Bhula made that up. I think Dr Bhula needs to resign, or she should be sacked. But I don't think the Minister for Health or the Attorney General care if the health authorities just make things up, and mislead the public and the Senate, as long as it supports the Narrative of "safe and effective" Here’s a link to the Act : And well done to Senator Gerard Renick - no wonder the rotten Liberal National Party have taken away his preselection, so he’s out of Parliament after the next election. The big parties can’t have independent thinkers in Parliament that might question Big Pharma.
4:49

THEY LIED AND CONTINUE TO LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING - and now they are trying to cover it up. The Pfizer & Moderna Covid "vaccines" are gene therapies. This is not some type of "conspiracy theory" - it’s an admitted fact. And now they are trying to cover it up. As under Australia’s Gene Technology Act 2000 if you are importing GMO into Australia you need a licence and approval from the Office of Gene Technology - but this never happened for the Covid injections. Further, part of the propaganda to trick the world to line up to get injected, was to misled people into believing that these Covid injections were just like traditional vaccines and therefore could be trusted - rather than tell the truth that they were a new novel technology, a form of gene therapy. So they lied. And the regulator was either asleep at the wheel, or part of dishonest cultural of our health bureaucracies that are more concerned about protecting the vested interests of Big Pharma than they are of protecting the public. Dr Julian Fidge BPharm, MBBS, FRACGP, MMed was posted these comments; Indeed, Dr Bhula must resign. I am absolutely convinced that everything she said was wrong, and that she deliberately misled the Senate. She does not seem to be telling the truth when she says that Pfizer doesn't need a licence because the vaccine is not manufactured in Australia. There is no basis for saying that. To to make and import a GMO definitely requires a licence. There is not mention of any exemption for production of the GMO overseas. Dr Bhula is also being completely irrational, saying that anyone can import any gene therapy into Australia, and do what they want with it, including mandating that it be injected into humans, as long as it is not manufactured here, without any oversight by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator. That does not make any sense at all. I can't find any mention in the Gene Technology Act where it says or implies that a person is exempt from getting a licence if the GMO is manufactured outside of Australia. I think that Dr Bhula made that up. I think Dr Bhula needs to resign, or she should be sacked. But I don't think the Minister for Health or the Attorney General care if the health authorities just make things up, and mislead the public and the Senate, as long as it supports the Narrative of "safe and effective" Here’s a link to the Act : And well done to Senator Gerard Renick - no wonder the rotten Liberal National Party have taken away his preselection, so he’s out of Parliament after the next election. The big parties can’t have independent thinkers in Parliament that might question Big Pharma.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

189,823 views • 2 years ago

"[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."
2:19

"[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."

Sense Receptor

33,743 views • 1 year ago

In 2022, Bioengineered Mosquitoes Were Released In Florida By Biotech Oxitec, Funded By Bill Gates, For The Purpose Of Ending Malaria. The Mosquitoes Were Released In The Florida Keys, Where There Was No Malaria. Now, For The First Time In 20 yrs, We Have Malaria In Florida. GMO Free USA & The Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes lost their battle to stop the Bill Gates funded company Oxitec from releasing the mosquitoes. The EPA gave the green light of approval to release 2.4 million of the genetically modified mosquitoes in areas where there was no malaria, for the purpose of eradicating disease. Florida residents were outraged. Oxitec failed to provide sufficient answers to the most pressing questions posed by concerned residents. Oxitec claimed that the GMO mosquito experiments would be monitored by the CDC. But, the CDC has stated, “CDC is not formally involved in any evaluation at this time. CDC is not overseeing the trial, and CDC does not plan to conduct any health assessments before, during, or after the trials.” Barry Wray, Executive Director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition: “What people should realize is that this is not just a Florida Keys issue. It’s a national issue,” Wray continued, “I truly believe we are fighting one of the most consequential regulatory malfunctions we could ever imagine. We all watched as four experts in the biotech field, each enthusiastic about the technology Oxitec had created and each wise enough to say that without proper scientific rigor and prudence, we risk unnecessary outcomes and mistakes. The problem is that the discovery of those mistakes and consequences may not be realized until damages are more severe and irreversible. All of this risk, that benefits a for-profit company getting to market quicker with a product that has yet to actually prove anything other than failure in all of its historical field trials.”
0:41

In 2022, Bioengineered Mosquitoes Were Released In Florida By Biotech Oxitec, Funded By Bill Gates, For The Purpose Of Ending Malaria. The Mosquitoes Were Released In The Florida Keys, Where There Was No Malaria. Now, For The First Time In 20 yrs, We Have Malaria In Florida. GMO Free USA & The Coalition Against GMO Mosquitoes lost their battle to stop the Bill Gates funded company Oxitec from releasing the mosquitoes. The EPA gave the green light of approval to release 2.4 million of the genetically modified mosquitoes in areas where there was no malaria, for the purpose of eradicating disease. Florida residents were outraged. Oxitec failed to provide sufficient answers to the most pressing questions posed by concerned residents. Oxitec claimed that the GMO mosquito experiments would be monitored by the CDC. But, the CDC has stated, “CDC is not formally involved in any evaluation at this time. CDC is not overseeing the trial, and CDC does not plan to conduct any health assessments before, during, or after the trials.” Barry Wray, Executive Director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition: “What people should realize is that this is not just a Florida Keys issue. It’s a national issue,” Wray continued, “I truly believe we are fighting one of the most consequential regulatory malfunctions we could ever imagine. We all watched as four experts in the biotech field, each enthusiastic about the technology Oxitec had created and each wise enough to say that without proper scientific rigor and prudence, we risk unnecessary outcomes and mistakes. The problem is that the discovery of those mistakes and consequences may not be realized until damages are more severe and irreversible. All of this risk, that benefits a for-profit company getting to market quicker with a product that has yet to actually prove anything other than failure in all of its historical field trials.”

Valerie Anne Smith

31,292 views • 1 month ago

A new mechanism for “RNA memory”! 😱 Thrilled to share another crazy paper from the lab (can’t believe we posted 2 in 2 days!), summarizing >10 years of research: Work on transgenerational inheritance of small RNAs in the powerful model organism C. elegans changed how we think about what’s possible in inheritance and evolution, because it allows the most heretical thing: inheritance of parental responses to the environment! However, it’s still unclear whether RNAs are inherited across generations in other animals, largely because the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases that amplify heritable small RNAs and prevent their dilution in C. elegans are not conserved in mammals. In this new work, an amazing collaboration with the Rink and Wurtzel labs, we show that planarians establish long-lasting and heritable small RNA–based gene regulatory states despite lacking canonical RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and nuclear RNAi machinery (that are required in C. elegans). You might say “they are both worms…” BUT planarians are evolutionarily very distant from C. elegans (flatworms vs. roundworms, diverged more than 500 million years ago), making this particularly surprising. These are totally different animals. We find that ingestion of double-stranded RNA induces sequence-specific silencing that persists for months and survives repeated cycles of whole-body regeneration. Even more strikingly, RNAi can be transferred between animals, echoing James V. McConnell’s controversial “RNA memory” experiments from the 1970s (his lab was targeted by the Unabomber terrorist Ted Kaczynski, who sent McConnell a bomb. This and other controversies ended this line of experiments…) Mechanistically, we find that the response transitions from a transient systemic dsRNA-triggered phase to a stable, cell-autonomous post-transcriptional “memory phase” maintained by antisense small RNAs. Using a new luminescence reporter (transgenesis is currently impossible in planarians), we show that silencing spreads along the targeted gene and identify a weird type of planarian small RNAs with untemplated polyA tails. RNAi inheritance without canonical RdRPs establishes planarians as a powerful system for studying RNA-based regulatory inheritance beyond C. elegans and raises the possibility that RNA-mediated inheritance may be more broadly conserved in animals, potentially even in mammals. Here’s a video of a planarian that is treated by RNAi against β-catenin and develops multiple heads instead of just one. This is one of the phenotypes that is inherited. Another phenotype is “loss of eyes” (which we show is not only inherited across multiple regeneration cycles, but can also be transmitted between animals in transplantation experiments). Amazing work led by first authors Prakash Cherian and Idit Aviram (co-supervised by Omri and me). Please read the preprint, the link is in the next tweet, and share!
0:44

A new mechanism for “RNA memory”! 😱 Thrilled to share another crazy paper from the lab (can’t believe we posted 2 in 2 days!), summarizing >10 years of research: Work on transgenerational inheritance of small RNAs in the powerful model organism C. elegans changed how we think about what’s possible in inheritance and evolution, because it allows the most heretical thing: inheritance of parental responses to the environment! However, it’s still unclear whether RNAs are inherited across generations in other animals, largely because the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases that amplify heritable small RNAs and prevent their dilution in C. elegans are not conserved in mammals. In this new work, an amazing collaboration with the Rink and Wurtzel labs, we show that planarians establish long-lasting and heritable small RNA–based gene regulatory states despite lacking canonical RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and nuclear RNAi machinery (that are required in C. elegans). You might say “they are both worms…” BUT planarians are evolutionarily very distant from C. elegans (flatworms vs. roundworms, diverged more than 500 million years ago), making this particularly surprising. These are totally different animals. We find that ingestion of double-stranded RNA induces sequence-specific silencing that persists for months and survives repeated cycles of whole-body regeneration. Even more strikingly, RNAi can be transferred between animals, echoing James V. McConnell’s controversial “RNA memory” experiments from the 1970s (his lab was targeted by the Unabomber terrorist Ted Kaczynski, who sent McConnell a bomb. This and other controversies ended this line of experiments…) Mechanistically, we find that the response transitions from a transient systemic dsRNA-triggered phase to a stable, cell-autonomous post-transcriptional “memory phase” maintained by antisense small RNAs. Using a new luminescence reporter (transgenesis is currently impossible in planarians), we show that silencing spreads along the targeted gene and identify a weird type of planarian small RNAs with untemplated polyA tails. RNAi inheritance without canonical RdRPs establishes planarians as a powerful system for studying RNA-based regulatory inheritance beyond C. elegans and raises the possibility that RNA-mediated inheritance may be more broadly conserved in animals, potentially even in mammals. Here’s a video of a planarian that is treated by RNAi against β-catenin and develops multiple heads instead of just one. This is one of the phenotypes that is inherited. Another phenotype is “loss of eyes” (which we show is not only inherited across multiple regeneration cycles, but can also be transmitted between animals in transplantation experiments). Amazing work led by first authors Prakash Cherian and Idit Aviram (co-supervised by Omri and me). Please read the preprint, the link is in the next tweet, and share!

Oded Rechavi

194,626 views • 5 months ago

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration
2:27

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

Wall Street Apes

473,423 views • 1 year ago

Powerful speech by Courtney Swan... My name is Courtney Swan. I have a master's of science in nutrition, and I host the Real Foodology podcast. And thank you so much for listening to me to us today. Our food is being tainted by dangerous chemicals, and it's making us sick. In 2009, I started to get debilitating stomachaches." "I bounced around between specialists with no clarity for two years until 2011 when I was diagnosed with a gluten intolerance. I was also at the time to I was also told to avoid corn and soy, which are common food sensitivities amongst my generation. Unfortunately, my story is not unique. Clueless to how this was connected to our food system, I started to do some digging. What I found was alarming." "Our current agriculture system origin story involves large chemical companies. Not farmers, chemists. 85% of the food that you're consuming started from a patented seed sold by a chemical corporation that was responsible for creating Agent Orange in the Vietnam War. Why are chemical companies feeding America? Corn, soy, and wheat are not only the most common allergens, but are among the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops today." "In 1974, the US started spraying our crops with an herbicide called glyphosate. And in the early nineteen nineties, we began to see the release of genetically modified foods into our food supply. It all seems to begin with a chemical company by the name IG Farben, the later parent company of Bayer. Farben provided the chemicals used in Nazi nerve agents and gas chambers. Years later, a second chemical company, Monsanto, joined the war industry with the production of Agent Orange, a toxin used during the Vietnam War." "When the wars ended, these companies needed a market for their chemicals. So they pivoted to killing bugs and pests on American farmlands. Monsanto began marketing glyphosate with the catchy name Roundup. They claimed that these chemicals were harmless and that they safeguarded our crops from pests. So farmers started spraying these supposedly safe chemicals on our farmland." "They solved the bug problem, but they also killed the crops. Monsanto offered a solution with the creation of genetically modified, otherwise known as GMO crops that resisted the glyphosate in the Roundup that they were spraying. These Roundup ready crops allow farmers to spray entire fields of glyphosate to kill off pests without harming the plants, but our food is left covered in toxic chemical residue that doesn't wash, dry, or cook off. Not only is it sprayed to kill pests, but in the final stages of harvest, it is sprayed on the wheat to dry it out. Grains that go into bread and cereals that are in grocery stores and homes of Americans are heavily sprayed with these toxins." "It's also being sprayed on oats, chickpeas, almonds, potatoes, and more. You can assume that if it's not organic, it is likely contaminated with glyphosate. In America, organic food by law cannot contain GMOs and glyphosate, and they are more expensive compared to conventionally grown options. Americans are being forced to pay more for food that isn't poisoned. The environmental working group reported a test of popular wheat based products and found glyphosate contamination in eighty to ninety percent of the products on grocery store shelves." "Popular foods like Cheerios, Goldfish, chickpea pasta like Bonza, Nature Valley bars were found to have concerning levels of glyphosate. If that is not alarming enough, glyphosate is produced by and distributed from China. In 2018, Bayer bought Monsanto. They currently have patented soybeans, corn, canola, and sugar beets, and they are the largest distributor of GMO corn and soybean seeds. Americans deserve a straight answer." "Why does an agrochemical company own where our food comes from? Currently, 85 to a % of corn and soy crops in The US are genetically modified. 80% of GMOs are engineered to withstand glyphosate. And a staggering 280,000,000 pounds of glyphosate are sprayed on American crops annually. We are eating this Roundup ready corn." "But unlike GMO crops, humans are not Roundup ready. We are not resistant to these toxins. And it's causing neurological damage, endocrine disruption. It's harming our reproductive health, and it's affecting fetal development. Glyphosate is classified as a carcinogen by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer." "It is also suspected to contribute towards the rise in celiac disease and gluten and gluten sensitivities. They're finding glyphosate in human breast milk placentas, our organs, and even sperm. It's also being found in our rain and our drinking water. Until January of twenty twenty two, many companies made efforts to obscure the presence of GMOs and pesticides in food products from from American consumers. It was only then that legislation came into effect mandating that these companies disclose such ingredients with a straightforward label stating made with bioengineered ingredients, but it's very small on the package." "Meanwhile, glyphosate still isn't labeled on our food. Parents in America are unknowingly feeding their children these toxic foods. Doctor Don Huber, a glyphosate researcher, warns that glyphosate will make the outlawed nineteen seventies insecticide DDT look harmless in comparison to glyphosate. Why is the US government subsidizing the most pesticide sprayed crops using taxpayer dollars? These are the exact foods that are driving the epidemic of chronic disease." "These crops heavily sprayed with glyphosate are then processed into high fructose corn syrup and refined vegetable oils, which are key ingredients for the ultra processed fruit foods that line our supermarket shelves and fill our children's lunches in schools across the nation. Children across America are consuming foods such as Goldfish and Cheerios that are loaded with glyphosate. These crops also feed our livestock, which then produce the eggs, dairy, and meat products that we consume. They are in everything. Pick up almost any ultra processed food package on the shelf and you will see the words contains corn, wheat, and soy on the ingredients panel." "Meanwhile, Bayer is doing everything it can to keep consumers in the dark while our government protects these corporate giants. They fund educational programs at major major agricultural universities. They lobby in Washington, and they collaborate with lawmakers to protect their profits over public health. Two congressmen are working with Bayer right now on the farm bill to protect Bayer from any liability despite already having to pay out billions to sick Americans who got cancer from their product. They know that their product is harming people." "Chronic illnesses are on the rise, and half of our population is obese. This is a national security issue. Seventy seven percent of young Americans are ineligible for military service. We have industrialized our food at the expense of our health, prioritizing profits over people to the point where our bodies can no longer cope with this chemical salt. We must stop subsidizing the foods that make us sick." "We must prioritize people over profit. This is not this is this isn't just about policy, it's about survival. Let's create a future where our food system is designed to nourish us and not destroy us. Thank you."
7:27

Powerful speech by Courtney Swan... My name is Courtney Swan. I have a master's of science in nutrition, and I host the Real Foodology podcast. And thank you so much for listening to me to us today. Our food is being tainted by dangerous chemicals, and it's making us sick. In 2009, I started to get debilitating stomachaches." "I bounced around between specialists with no clarity for two years until 2011 when I was diagnosed with a gluten intolerance. I was also at the time to I was also told to avoid corn and soy, which are common food sensitivities amongst my generation. Unfortunately, my story is not unique. Clueless to how this was connected to our food system, I started to do some digging. What I found was alarming." "Our current agriculture system origin story involves large chemical companies. Not farmers, chemists. 85% of the food that you're consuming started from a patented seed sold by a chemical corporation that was responsible for creating Agent Orange in the Vietnam War. Why are chemical companies feeding America? Corn, soy, and wheat are not only the most common allergens, but are among the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops today." "In 1974, the US started spraying our crops with an herbicide called glyphosate. And in the early nineteen nineties, we began to see the release of genetically modified foods into our food supply. It all seems to begin with a chemical company by the name IG Farben, the later parent company of Bayer. Farben provided the chemicals used in Nazi nerve agents and gas chambers. Years later, a second chemical company, Monsanto, joined the war industry with the production of Agent Orange, a toxin used during the Vietnam War." "When the wars ended, these companies needed a market for their chemicals. So they pivoted to killing bugs and pests on American farmlands. Monsanto began marketing glyphosate with the catchy name Roundup. They claimed that these chemicals were harmless and that they safeguarded our crops from pests. So farmers started spraying these supposedly safe chemicals on our farmland." "They solved the bug problem, but they also killed the crops. Monsanto offered a solution with the creation of genetically modified, otherwise known as GMO crops that resisted the glyphosate in the Roundup that they were spraying. These Roundup ready crops allow farmers to spray entire fields of glyphosate to kill off pests without harming the plants, but our food is left covered in toxic chemical residue that doesn't wash, dry, or cook off. Not only is it sprayed to kill pests, but in the final stages of harvest, it is sprayed on the wheat to dry it out. Grains that go into bread and cereals that are in grocery stores and homes of Americans are heavily sprayed with these toxins." "It's also being sprayed on oats, chickpeas, almonds, potatoes, and more. You can assume that if it's not organic, it is likely contaminated with glyphosate. In America, organic food by law cannot contain GMOs and glyphosate, and they are more expensive compared to conventionally grown options. Americans are being forced to pay more for food that isn't poisoned. The environmental working group reported a test of popular wheat based products and found glyphosate contamination in eighty to ninety percent of the products on grocery store shelves." "Popular foods like Cheerios, Goldfish, chickpea pasta like Bonza, Nature Valley bars were found to have concerning levels of glyphosate. If that is not alarming enough, glyphosate is produced by and distributed from China. In 2018, Bayer bought Monsanto. They currently have patented soybeans, corn, canola, and sugar beets, and they are the largest distributor of GMO corn and soybean seeds. Americans deserve a straight answer." "Why does an agrochemical company own where our food comes from? Currently, 85 to a % of corn and soy crops in The US are genetically modified. 80% of GMOs are engineered to withstand glyphosate. And a staggering 280,000,000 pounds of glyphosate are sprayed on American crops annually. We are eating this Roundup ready corn." "But unlike GMO crops, humans are not Roundup ready. We are not resistant to these toxins. And it's causing neurological damage, endocrine disruption. It's harming our reproductive health, and it's affecting fetal development. Glyphosate is classified as a carcinogen by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer." "It is also suspected to contribute towards the rise in celiac disease and gluten and gluten sensitivities. They're finding glyphosate in human breast milk placentas, our organs, and even sperm. It's also being found in our rain and our drinking water. Until January of twenty twenty two, many companies made efforts to obscure the presence of GMOs and pesticides in food products from from American consumers. It was only then that legislation came into effect mandating that these companies disclose such ingredients with a straightforward label stating made with bioengineered ingredients, but it's very small on the package." "Meanwhile, glyphosate still isn't labeled on our food. Parents in America are unknowingly feeding their children these toxic foods. Doctor Don Huber, a glyphosate researcher, warns that glyphosate will make the outlawed nineteen seventies insecticide DDT look harmless in comparison to glyphosate. Why is the US government subsidizing the most pesticide sprayed crops using taxpayer dollars? These are the exact foods that are driving the epidemic of chronic disease." "These crops heavily sprayed with glyphosate are then processed into high fructose corn syrup and refined vegetable oils, which are key ingredients for the ultra processed fruit foods that line our supermarket shelves and fill our children's lunches in schools across the nation. Children across America are consuming foods such as Goldfish and Cheerios that are loaded with glyphosate. These crops also feed our livestock, which then produce the eggs, dairy, and meat products that we consume. They are in everything. Pick up almost any ultra processed food package on the shelf and you will see the words contains corn, wheat, and soy on the ingredients panel." "Meanwhile, Bayer is doing everything it can to keep consumers in the dark while our government protects these corporate giants. They fund educational programs at major major agricultural universities. They lobby in Washington, and they collaborate with lawmakers to protect their profits over public health. Two congressmen are working with Bayer right now on the farm bill to protect Bayer from any liability despite already having to pay out billions to sick Americans who got cancer from their product. They know that their product is harming people." "Chronic illnesses are on the rise, and half of our population is obese. This is a national security issue. Seventy seven percent of young Americans are ineligible for military service. We have industrialized our food at the expense of our health, prioritizing profits over people to the point where our bodies can no longer cope with this chemical salt. We must stop subsidizing the foods that make us sick." "We must prioritize people over profit. This is not this is this isn't just about policy, it's about survival. Let's create a future where our food system is designed to nourish us and not destroy us. Thank you."

Camus

173,348 views • 1 year ago

ASCORBIC ACID Is Not Vitamin C...It Is A Synthetic Lab Created Isolate Chemical Made From GMO Corn & The Black Mold Aspergillus Niger. 99% Of Vitamin C Supplements Are Synthetic, Using Sulfuric Acid & Acetone In Production. Black Mold A. Niger Is Known To Be A Severe Allergen. Over 80% of Ascorbic Acid is made in Chinese Laboratories & fermentation tanks while the remaining 20% is made in the US using the same process: GMO Corn as a Source: Synthetic ascorbic acid is manufactured in bulk using fermented corn syrup, which is derived from GMO corn. A. Niger in Fermentation: Aspergillus Niger black mold is employed in the industrial fermentation process that converts corn-derived dextrose into ascorbic acid. The Process: The process involves refining GMO corn into a sugary syrup, which is then fermented using A. Niger black mold in fermentation tanks to produce ascorbic acid. Solvents & other chemicals like acetone, sulfuric acid, ethanol & methanol are used in the processing steps. Ingredient Labels: If the ingredient label says 'Ascorbic Acid'...you can be 100% certain that what you are consuming IS synthetic Ascorbic Acid from A. Niger black mold. This also includes these 3 additional forms: Mineral Ascorbates: which is ascorbic acid with an attached mineral. Liposomal-C: which is ascorbic acid attached to vegetable seed oils. Bioflavonoid-C: which is ascorbic acid with bioflavonoids added. It's always best to obtain whole food Vitamin C from actual whole foods. If you are not consuming whole foods for your Vitamin C, then these are the supplements you want to look for to purchase: If the ingredient label says 'Whole Food Vitamin C' from acerola cherries, camu camu berries, rose hips, amla berries, berries, lemons, etc...then your Vitamin C supplement contains the whole food compound of natural Vitamin C. Why your body doesn’t like synthetic Ascorbic Acid: Ascorbic acid is a human-made chemical created as a cost-effective additive. 100% synthetic from GMO corn with almost no bioavailability because it is not Vitamin C Compound. Naturally-occurring vitamin C found in food contains the whole compounds & minerals, including rutin, bioflavonoids, K-factor, J-factor, P-factor, tyrosinase (a copper-containing enzyme) & ascorbinogen. If any of these parts are missing, there is no vitamin C & no vitamin activity. You need the whole food to receive the full vitamin, & thus, all of the benefits it yields. Detrimental Effects From Ascorbic Acid: Our bodies do not recognize synthetic ascorbic acid as Vitamin C. Inflammation & health issues will occur. Ascorbic Acid depletes the adrenals & our copper reserves, drives ferritin to toxic levels causing iron overload. Ascorbic Acid also converts to Oxalate within the body & further causes insult to injury with the formation of Calcium Oxalate stones & crystals in the kidneys & other Oxalic Acid illnesses in the body. Synthetic Ascorbic Acid, because it is made by black mold A. Niger fermentation, causes an allergic inflammatory cascade. Ingestion of foods, beverages or supplements containing synthetic ascorbic acid leads to increased inflammation, which then affects the respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological, urinary & musculoskeletal systems. 👇Ascorbic Acid Increases Cardiovascular Risk👇 👇Ascorbic Acid Has No Antioxidant Benefit👇 👇Ascorbic Acid Damages DNA👇 Speaker: Andy Jay
1:18

ASCORBIC ACID Is Not Vitamin C...It Is A Synthetic Lab Created Isolate Chemical Made From GMO Corn & The Black Mold Aspergillus Niger. 99% Of Vitamin C Supplements Are Synthetic, Using Sulfuric Acid & Acetone In Production. Black Mold A. Niger Is Known To Be A Severe Allergen. Over 80% of Ascorbic Acid is made in Chinese Laboratories & fermentation tanks while the remaining 20% is made in the US using the same process: GMO Corn as a Source: Synthetic ascorbic acid is manufactured in bulk using fermented corn syrup, which is derived from GMO corn. A. Niger in Fermentation: Aspergillus Niger black mold is employed in the industrial fermentation process that converts corn-derived dextrose into ascorbic acid. The Process: The process involves refining GMO corn into a sugary syrup, which is then fermented using A. Niger black mold in fermentation tanks to produce ascorbic acid. Solvents & other chemicals like acetone, sulfuric acid, ethanol & methanol are used in the processing steps. Ingredient Labels: If the ingredient label says 'Ascorbic Acid'...you can be 100% certain that what you are consuming IS synthetic Ascorbic Acid from A. Niger black mold. This also includes these 3 additional forms: Mineral Ascorbates: which is ascorbic acid with an attached mineral. Liposomal-C: which is ascorbic acid attached to vegetable seed oils. Bioflavonoid-C: which is ascorbic acid with bioflavonoids added. It's always best to obtain whole food Vitamin C from actual whole foods. If you are not consuming whole foods for your Vitamin C, then these are the supplements you want to look for to purchase: If the ingredient label says 'Whole Food Vitamin C' from acerola cherries, camu camu berries, rose hips, amla berries, berries, lemons, etc...then your Vitamin C supplement contains the whole food compound of natural Vitamin C. Why your body doesn’t like synthetic Ascorbic Acid: Ascorbic acid is a human-made chemical created as a cost-effective additive. 100% synthetic from GMO corn with almost no bioavailability because it is not Vitamin C Compound. Naturally-occurring vitamin C found in food contains the whole compounds & minerals, including rutin, bioflavonoids, K-factor, J-factor, P-factor, tyrosinase (a copper-containing enzyme) & ascorbinogen. If any of these parts are missing, there is no vitamin C & no vitamin activity. You need the whole food to receive the full vitamin, & thus, all of the benefits it yields. Detrimental Effects From Ascorbic Acid: Our bodies do not recognize synthetic ascorbic acid as Vitamin C. Inflammation & health issues will occur. Ascorbic Acid depletes the adrenals & our copper reserves, drives ferritin to toxic levels causing iron overload. Ascorbic Acid also converts to Oxalate within the body & further causes insult to injury with the formation of Calcium Oxalate stones & crystals in the kidneys & other Oxalic Acid illnesses in the body. Synthetic Ascorbic Acid, because it is made by black mold A. Niger fermentation, causes an allergic inflammatory cascade. Ingestion of foods, beverages or supplements containing synthetic ascorbic acid leads to increased inflammation, which then affects the respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological, urinary & musculoskeletal systems. 👇Ascorbic Acid Increases Cardiovascular Risk👇 👇Ascorbic Acid Has No Antioxidant Benefit👇 👇Ascorbic Acid Damages DNA👇 Speaker: Andy Jay

Valerie Anne Smith

150,650 views • 1 year ago