Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Using Claude in Chrome product. Prompt: replicate this image (my profile picture) in jspaint, use brushes to replicate it as closely as possible. I want you to use brushes and clicking. Do not use javascript tool, but the final result has to be very close to this image. DO...

404,430 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Kiana Ehsani
Kiana Ehsani11 дней назад

If you don't tell Claude you want the exact replicate it will use its creative power and makes images that are different (this image is from the exact same setup but with the prompt "paint this image in paint" instead of the prompt above). We need to work on Claude being better at understanding the vague prompts, that I agree with!

Фото профиля EveryMaiden
EveryMaiden11 дней назад

This is pretty awesome great work.

Фото профиля longiy
longiy11 дней назад

Painting like a person who loves art but have no aptitude for art

Фото профиля tmuxvim
tmuxvim11 дней назад

could have cropped this a bit champ

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide11 дней назад

Painting brush by brush is impressive

Фото профиля Joe Devon
Joe Devon11 дней назад

Wow. Wild

Фото профиля Feifei Qiu
Feifei Qiu11 дней назад

Wow. Very impressive, So claude can draw beyond using regular shapes

Фото профиля 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB11 дней назад

这也太像素级了,Claude居然真能靠点按画出来 👀

Фото профиля ikhwanb
ikhwanb11 дней назад

Love the creative power version

Фото профиля Joe Mama 🇹🇹
Joe Mama 🇹🇹11 дней назад

How many sweet tokens did this cost ya?

Фото профиля Pouri Erfanzadeh
Pouri Erfanzadeh11 дней назад

Very cool indeed.

Похожие видео

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Our first short course with Anthropic! Building Towards Computer Use with Anthropic. This teaches you to build an LLM-based agent that uses a computer interface by generating mouse clicks and keystrokes. Computer Use is an important, emerging capability for LLMs that will let AI agents do many more tasks than were possible before, since it lets them interact with interfaces designed for humans to use, rather than only tools that provide explicit API access. I hope you will enjoy learning about it! This course is taught by Anthropic's Head of Curriculum, Colt_Steele. You'll learn to apply image reasoning and tool use to "use" a computer as follows: a model processes an image of the screen, analyzes it to understand what's going on, and navigates the computer via mouse clicks and keystrokes. This course goes through the key building blocks, and culminates in a demo of an AI assistant that uses a web browser to search for a research paper, downloads the PDF, and finally summarizes the paper for you. In detail, you’ll: - Learn about Anthropic's family of models, when to use which one, and make API requests to Claude - Use multi-modal prompts that combine text and image content blocks, and also work with streaming responses - Improve your prompting by using prompt templates, using XML to structure prompts, and providing examples - Implement prompt caching to reduce cost and latency - Apply tool-use to build a chatbot that can call different tools to respond to queries - See all these building blocks come together in Computer Use demo Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

170,541 просмотров • 1 год назад

Codex has become a real game engine... If you take the time to make it become one. You can do EVERYTHING in it. And I think I've cracked the perfect custom UX? I'd like to show you how I use it. See video below 4 steps: - Create a custom tool you need, like one to generate new buildings that matches you game art direction - Ask Codex to open this tool in a worktree (important) - Attach the browser view of your tool in the Thread - Use pinned thread to have easy access to the tool And there you go: you have what I call a "codex-augmented" tool, which it's incredibly powerful because - the tool will speed up your development immensely AND also: - you can improve the tool as you use it with codex For example, let's say I want to add a new button to my 3D building gen tool so I can generate a thumbnail of the 3D building. - I click on "Building Lab" - I prompt Codex "add a button to generate thumbnails" - I have my new button - I can use the tool right away in the pinned Thread You can then use the /yeet skill to commit, push and create a PR with the changes you made to your tool. I have tools for everything - To manage my tasks in Linear - To do content / social media / steam marketing - To localize the game in 9 languages - To manage sounds, musics and voice lines - To generate and fine tune buildings - To create and animate procedural zombies - To tweak environnement/decor and map design - To manage my analytics - To simulate late game perf I'll be honest it's incredibly powerful and easy!

Nicolas Zullo

79,848 просмотров • 29 дней назад

This might be the best "AI Engineer" I've tried so far. ​ I'm an old school developer who started 30 years ago. I feel very uncomfortable letting AI take control of my code, but for the sake of science, I spent two hours building an application that took me weeks to build a couple of years ago. ​ I used Pythagora, a brand new tool backed by Y Combinator. They just released to the public. ​ Keep in mind that I use AI every day to write code, but Pythagora is something different: it's a tool that leads, and uses you—the human—as the copilot. ​ I go into more details in the video, but here is the TLDR; ​ 1. Holy molly! We've made a ton of progress on this front! This is way better than Devin when I tested it a few months back. ​ 2. Love the approach of generating a plan with sub-tasks before writing any code. ​ 3. The tools never tries to do too much: it tackles every small task one at a time, and gives you instructions so you test everything. ​ 4. It does exactly what you'd do when it gets stuck: writes a bunch of logs and uses those to correct itself. Pretty neat! ​ 5. It's fast. It runs locally. It's an extension to Visual Studio Code. ​ I'm impressed, but I don't think this tool is for me. ​ I'm not the type of developer who's ready to relinquish control. I felt I had no connection with the code because I didn't write it. It was not my code. ​ I know many people who don't care about this. I know many people who will get tremendous value out of Pythagora. I hope they keep pushing the limits, providing feedback, and helping this get to a point where old folks like me feel more comfortable using it. ​ Don't take my word for it. The best thing you can do is to give it a try and see how you feel using it. ​ Thanks to the team who built this, for all of the explanations and support, and especially, for sitting and listening to my dumb questions for 2 hours while I tested this.

Santiago

212,056 просмотров • 2 лет назад