正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

using GPT 5.6 I vibe-coded Tetris, but the board rotates.

anul agarwal

7,084 subscribers

557,936 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I just vibe coded a playable FPS game in 1 day with GPT-5.6 Sol. 🤯 This is insane. Coding with this model feels like directing a cracked dev team in real time. Anthropic is cooked.

I just vibe coded a playable FPS game in 1 day with GPT-5.6 Sol. 🤯 This is insane. Coding with this model feels like directing a cracked dev team in real time. Anthropic is cooked.

VraserX e/acc

61,464 次观看 • 1 个月前

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,212 次观看 • 21 天前

Vibe coded another game UI, generated with GPT Images 2 UI GPT Images 2 → Gemini 3.1 Pro 3D assets GPT Images 2 → Tripo

Vibe coded another game UI, generated with GPT Images 2 UI GPT Images 2 → Gemini 3.1 Pro 3D assets GPT Images 2 → Tripo

Dilum Sanjaya

186,847 次观看 • 3 个月前

Codex users: here's an amazing way to take advantage of the efficiency and capability of GPT-5.6 Luna Max. It's called 'sol-advisor'. 1. GPT-5.6 Sol High as orchestrator 2. GPT-5.6 Luna Max as implementer for routine tasks 3. GPT-5.6 Terra Max as implementer for complex tasks 4. Fresh GPT-5.6 Sol instance as reviewer A free and open-source plugin for Codex. Installation instructions below 👇 I dare you to install it, and tell me if you hit your weekly usage limits using 'sol-advisor'. I doubt you can.

Codex users: here's an amazing way to take advantage of the efficiency and capability of GPT-5.6 Luna Max. It's called 'sol-advisor'. 1. GPT-5.6 Sol High as orchestrator 2. GPT-5.6 Luna Max as implementer for routine tasks 3. GPT-5.6 Terra Max as implementer for complex tasks 4. Fresh GPT-5.6 Sol instance as reviewer A free and open-source plugin for Codex. Installation instructions below 👇 I dare you to install it, and tell me if you hit your weekly usage limits using 'sol-advisor'. I doubt you can.

Dan McAteer

647,084 次观看 • 4 天前

I'm ngl, it turned out WAY better than I thought. Here are 3 examples using the UI skill GPT 5.6 Sol made

I'm ngl, it turned out WAY better than I thought. Here are 3 examples using the UI skill GPT 5.6 Sol made

Leon Lin

62,742 次观看 • 23 天前

i made tetris but the board and pieces are attached to your body and it's quite tiring to play

i made tetris but the board and pieces are attached to your body and it's quite tiring to play

AA

2,883,237 次观看 • 4 个月前

i recreated this with GPT 5.6 Sol & it costed me ~$5 only & 2 prompts >GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra as the main agent, admin & orchestrator >GPT 5.6 Luna Max as sub-agents >used the Codex app >used about 20% of my weekly limit on $100 plan ($100/4 * 20%) some bugs, and improvements would take another prompt but pretty good for $5!

i recreated this with GPT 5.6 Sol & it costed me ~$5 only & 2 prompts >GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra as the main agent, admin & orchestrator >GPT 5.6 Luna Max as sub-agents >used the Codex app >used about 20% of my weekly limit on $100 plan ($100/4 * 20%) some bugs, and improvements would take another prompt but pretty good for $5!

anul agarwal

15,718 次观看 • 3 天前

Here’s my attempt to recreate the classic King Kong game from the Commodore 64 era ~40 years later, using Codex GPT-5.6 Sol. I tried to capture the vibe & pixel-art charm of the original with roguelike elements and some new game features. Give it a try:

Here’s my attempt to recreate the classic King Kong game from the Commodore 64 era ~40 years later, using Codex GPT-5.6 Sol. I tried to capture the vibe & pixel-art charm of the original with roguelike elements and some new game features. Give it a try:

Derya Unutmaz, MD

15,986 次观看 • 23 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,206 次观看 • 1 个月前

the new age of 'personalized shopping' I made a clone of aritzia where I'm the model on every piece of clothing Buillt with gpt-5.6-sol standard...but just you wait for gpt-5.6-sol ultrafast (750 tok/s) running on Cerebras coming soon 👀

the new age of 'personalized shopping' I made a clone of aritzia where I'm the model on every piece of clothing Buillt with gpt-5.6-sol standard...but just you wait for gpt-5.6-sol ultrafast (750 tok/s) running on Cerebras coming soon 👀

Sarah Chieng

188,482 次观看 • 12 天前

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why

David Ondrej

17,508 次观看 • 1 个月前

Huge respect for GPT-5.6 Sol, but this is on another level.

Huge respect for GPT-5.6 Sol, but this is on another level.

define

13,086 次观看 • 26 天前

GPT-5.6 is here. I wish we could use it.

GPT-5.6 is here. I wish we could use it.

Theo - t3.gg

84,673 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here's how I'm generating game ready art assets for my vibe coded game; → No coding → No photoshop. → No asset packs. Instead I'm using → Codex CLI → GPT 5.4 → GPT Image 1.5 → Sora 2 Idle anims, walk cycles, attack, crouch, jump ... Full video tutorial + breakdown👇

Here's how I'm generating game ready art assets for my vibe coded game; → No coding → No photoshop. → No asset packs. Instead I'm using → Codex CLI → GPT 5.4 → GPT Image 1.5 → Sora 2 Idle anims, walk cycles, attack, crouch, jump ... Full video tutorial + breakdown👇

Chong-U

80,999 次观看 • 4 个月前

I just one shot vibe coded this "friendly retro game" using Gemini 3. AI is incredible. We are so cooked.

I just one shot vibe coded this "friendly retro game" using Gemini 3. AI is incredible. We are so cooked.

Jon Yongfook

139,084 次观看 • 8 个月前

I asked GPT 5.6 Sol to recreate the beloved 90s sitcom Martin starring Martin Lawrence

I asked GPT 5.6 Sol to recreate the beloved 90s sitcom Martin starring Martin Lawrence

bone

14,425 次观看 • 21 天前

I spent $241 testing GPT 5.6 vs Fable 5 here are the brutally honest results

I spent $241 testing GPT 5.6 vs Fable 5 here are the brutally honest results

Robin Ebers • Build Apps With AI

16,209 次观看 • 26 天前

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,093 次观看 • 19 天前

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Viktor Oddy

840,830 次观看 • 26 天前