正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Vanessa Van Edwards revealed the ultimate dating hack backed by psychology: Women rank humor as their #1 trait in men. Men don’t care nearly as much if a woman is funny — they care if she laughs at THEIR jokes. Her takeaway is brutally simple and powerful: - Men:...

52,471 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

We’re in a weird place now where random girls have better insight into male psychology than most ‘pro-male’ accounts. Usually you do not want to take advice from women, but look what these chicks say: ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re unconfident (TRUE; many men are terrified to an almost hysterical degree of women right now) ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re lazy (TRUE; “why take the risk of approaching a girl when I can just open up an app?” → something far too many guys think now) ✅ If you get shot down, whatever; just go to the next girl (TRUE; she is not some magical special girl whose rejection has crippled you forever. Go approach another girl, and another after that! Meeting women is a NUMBERS GAME!) ✅ Be kind, don’t be weird (TRUE; there is a difference between being a ‘nice guy’ vs. just being a cool, warm-hearted, sociable dude. You do not have to be some cartoonish ‘alpha male’ and in fact that does not work. The ‘bad boys’ women are attracted to are generally actually kinder people than the average ‘nice guy’ is — they communicate what they really want, do not behave like they feel entitled to something from her, do not place her on a pedestal she can never hope to live up to, and don’t get weird or resentful or depressed when she flirts with or tests them) ✅ Approach with friendship as the basis (TRUE; so long as you do not MISINTERPRET this and think you need to be a neutered, asexual ‘friend’ instead. You need to be her SEXY friend, who is playful and flirtatious and a bit naughty, not the nice guy friend who acts like he has no balls and just wants to be her shoulder to cry on) As a matter of fact, I would actually say women’s advice to men has SOMEHOW STRANGELY IMPROVED over the last 15 years, while most men’s advice to other men has EGREGIOUSLY WORSENED. Men are online telling each other stuff like “you don’t need women; focus on the money and the women will come” (this will get you women who are after “a nice lifestyle”, i.e., gold diggers) and “never tolerate a woman who doesn’t put you first” (newsflash: until you are regularly banging her out, she is NEVER going to put you first!). Honestly, most advice I see men giving other men online nowadays is putting the cart before the horse type advice. Yes, you need money… but you should focus on that AFTER you get her. You are supposed to enjoy women young, then pick a woman and focus on building a life. A lot of dudes have it ass-backwards now. Yes, you need a woman who will put you first… but that comes AFTER you are banging her out. If you want her to do that before you shag her silly, you will be looking for a LONG time, my friend, as well as dating DOWN in a BIG way. Actually I was pretty surprised to hear these girls talk about “if you get rejected, go to the next one.” Back in the day a lot of girls seemed to always treat dating advice like “whatever girl you approach, treat her like your future wife!” Seems like there is a lot more consciousness among women at this point that dating is a numbers game and as a guy you’ve got to put in the reps. Strangely, men seem to have forgotten this… and approaching has become life and death… with dating apps the new ‘safe space’. Strange times we are in!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

32,048 次观看 • 5 个月前

Most guys do not realize how dirty, naughty, and sexual women are. The average woman is way dirtier than the average man. I don’t think I’ve ever met a woman who wasn’t turned on by public sex, for example. Very few men are as into it as women are. As a guy, when you’re about to get it on with a girl in public, she’s there moaning, telling you to “put it in”; meanwhile you are looking around to check if anyone else is nearby while positioning her in this uncomfortable public position in the dirt, in the cold, and telling her “all right, hold on, I’m working on it, let me just get it up here, give me a second, sheesh!” If you read a woman’s romance novel, there is so much ink spilled on teasing, build up, this sex act, that sex act, the other sex act, that it’s basically unreadable if you are a guy. As a guy, you just wanna get your hot dog in her hot dog bun. But women want to do all KINDS of stuff. There’s a million things sexually these girls want to do. So why aren’t girls jumping at the chance to go to bed with every guy they meet? ✅ She needs to TRUST a guy first. Trust that she is safe with him. Trust that he will not judge her. Trust that it won’t affect her reputation. Many men aren’t good at building trust. Trust is KEY. ✅ She needs some degree of attraction to the guy. Not NEARLY as much as most guys think. She does NOT need to be wild with desire for you to sleep with you. It is even possible to sleep with women who really are not attracted to you at all, but who are just bored (and horny) and you did the moves right. (Or, bonus round, you just offered her an experience she has always fantasized about, so even if you are not her dream guy, she nevertheless says fine, let’s do it.) ✅ She needs to be aroused. You know the whole “women’s arousal is like a dimmer” thing… it’s accurate. You need to ramp her arousal up with touch, teasing, flirtation, innuendo, sex talk, etc. ✅ She needs to be ALONE with you. If she trusts you enough, you can get her alone with you. Once she’s alone with you, if there is trust there, and there’s arousal, and maybe a bit of attraction, you will get her clothes off. Yes… even if she is a ‘good’ girl. ‘Good’ girls did not manage to pass down their genes by hating sex (they are just a bit more selective about the men they have it with, is all. They need more TRUST!). Also: don’t be UNNERVED by female sexuality. Every girl has a tigress inside her waiting for the right guy to unleash it… a guy who makes her trust him, arouses her, gets her alone with him, and maybe creates some attraction with her. Women’s romance novels are ALL about this. Women’s romances in real life are as well. In fact, in real life, women often settle for far less ideal situations: men they don’t completely trust, aren’t that attracted to, are only partway aroused by, who get them alone somewhere. The better a job you can do approaching her sexual “Platonic ideal”, the more reliably you can bring out that sexual tigress lurking inside of EVERY woman (even the ‘good’ girls).

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

34,136 次观看 • 7 个月前

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,674 次观看 • 10 个月前