Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Vani Hari has been harassed at speaking engagements, doxed in a corporate database, had her Wikipedia page taken over, and watched as hired experts were deployed against her in the press for years. Monsanto Bayer did all of it to protect a product she says they know causes cancer....

HighWireTalk's profile picture

The HighWire

253,281 subscribers

10,807 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bayer and Monsanto are facing over 170,000 cancer lawsuits worth $16 billion, and instead of accepting accountability, they are asking the Supreme Court to shield them from liability entirely. On April 27th, people are marching on the Supreme Court steps in Washington DC to make one thing clear: no company gets to poison families and then buy its way out of the consequences. Equal justice under the law means chemical companies answer for the harm they cause, the same as everyone else. People vs. Poison. April 27th. Washington DC. Details and speaker lineup at
0:42

Bayer and Monsanto are facing over 170,000 cancer lawsuits worth $16 billion, and instead of accepting accountability, they are asking the Supreme Court to shield them from liability entirely. On April 27th, people are marching on the Supreme Court steps in Washington DC to make one thing clear: no company gets to poison families and then buy its way out of the consequences. Equal justice under the law means chemical companies answer for the harm they cause, the same as everyone else. People vs. Poison. April 27th. Washington DC. Details and speaker lineup at

The HighWire

10,245 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A toxicologist who studies how poisons enter cells and cause cancer, chronic disease, and neurological damage reviewed the scientific literature on glyphosate herself. Her conclusion was unambiguous: it is a carcinogen, it damages DNA, and the evidence linking it to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in people exposed to Roundup is substantial. Alexandra Munoz will be at the People vs. Poison rally on April 27th on the steps of the Supreme Court, along with a full day of speakers making the case that this information has been suppressed by Monsanto for decades and that the American people deserve to hear the truth. April 27th. Washington DC - be there
0:46

A toxicologist who studies how poisons enter cells and cause cancer, chronic disease, and neurological damage reviewed the scientific literature on glyphosate herself. Her conclusion was unambiguous: it is a carcinogen, it damages DNA, and the evidence linking it to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in people exposed to Roundup is substantial. Alexandra Munoz will be at the People vs. Poison rally on April 27th on the steps of the Supreme Court, along with a full day of speakers making the case that this information has been suppressed by Monsanto for decades and that the American people deserve to hear the truth. April 27th. Washington DC - be there

The HighWire

11,452 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 A major pesticide case is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court. On April 27, the Court will hear arguments involving Monsanto/Bayer and whether pesticide manufacturers should be shielded from liability after billions in glyphosate-related lawsuits. Vani Hari and an army of advocates are planning a march outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., calling it “The People vs. Poison.” Families, farmers, and concerned citizens are invited to gather peacefully and raise awareness as the future of corporate accountability is debated. Would you show up? To learn more, follow Vani Hari and register at
1:22

🚨 A major pesticide case is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court. On April 27, the Court will hear arguments involving Monsanto/Bayer and whether pesticide manufacturers should be shielded from liability after billions in glyphosate-related lawsuits. Vani Hari and an army of advocates are planning a march outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., calling it “The People vs. Poison.” Families, farmers, and concerned citizens are invited to gather peacefully and raise awareness as the future of corporate accountability is debated. Would you show up? To learn more, follow Vani Hari and register at

The HighWire

12,588 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"They want to give us cancer and get away with it." Vani Hari Vani Hari takes the stage outside the U.S. Supreme Court with a blunt warning: inside that building, Bayer/Monsanto is arguing for the right to poison us and not be held accountable. “You cannot claim to care about health while protecting poison,” Hari said. “You cannot tell Americans to eat real food while protecting the cancer-causing chemicals sprayed on it.” Farmers, scientists, lawmakers, and families from across the country have gathered in Washington, D.C., saying they are done pretending this is normal. As the Supreme Court weighs whether federal pesticide approvals can shield corporations from failure-to-warn lawsuits, the crowd is demanding transparency, accountability, and an honest look at the science behind the chemicals sprayed on our food.
2:03

"They want to give us cancer and get away with it." Vani Hari Vani Hari takes the stage outside the U.S. Supreme Court with a blunt warning: inside that building, Bayer/Monsanto is arguing for the right to poison us and not be held accountable. “You cannot claim to care about health while protecting poison,” Hari said. “You cannot tell Americans to eat real food while protecting the cancer-causing chemicals sprayed on it.” Farmers, scientists, lawmakers, and families from across the country have gathered in Washington, D.C., saying they are done pretending this is normal. As the Supreme Court weighs whether federal pesticide approvals can shield corporations from failure-to-warn lawsuits, the crowd is demanding transparency, accountability, and an honest look at the science behind the chemicals sprayed on our food.

The HighWire

11,942 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"This 100% causes cancer." A toxicologist said that. Not an activist. Dr. Alexandra Muñoz, PhD, breaks down the science on glyphosate, the herbicide sprayed across American farmland, and says the evidence is conclusive. Glyphosate causes DNA double-strand breaks, the kind of damage cells struggle to repair, triggering a cascade that leads to cancer formation. Skin. Thyroid. Liver. Urinary cancers. Multiple types of leukemia. Across multiple doses. Across multiple formulations. Yet the EPA still maintains it doesn't cause cancer. And industry-friendly scientists continue to challenge the IARC's 2015 classification of cancer. This Monday, April 27th, thousands are marching in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to demand accountability. The science is clear. Now it's time for action. Sign up to attend the rally at We will be live-streaming the event starting at 9am on Monday, April 27th. Be there!
1:12

"This 100% causes cancer." A toxicologist said that. Not an activist. Dr. Alexandra Muñoz, PhD, breaks down the science on glyphosate, the herbicide sprayed across American farmland, and says the evidence is conclusive. Glyphosate causes DNA double-strand breaks, the kind of damage cells struggle to repair, triggering a cascade that leads to cancer formation. Skin. Thyroid. Liver. Urinary cancers. Multiple types of leukemia. Across multiple doses. Across multiple formulations. Yet the EPA still maintains it doesn't cause cancer. And industry-friendly scientists continue to challenge the IARC's 2015 classification of cancer. This Monday, April 27th, thousands are marching in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to demand accountability. The science is clear. Now it's time for action. Sign up to attend the rally at We will be live-streaming the event starting at 9am on Monday, April 27th. Be there!

The HighWire

11,107 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.
0:43

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,556 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It worked with vaccines. They're trying it again with our food supply. While everyone's eyes are on bombs dropping overseas, something just happened in Washington that will affect every American sitting down to dinner for generations. The Trump administration's EPA filed a brief at the Supreme Court backing Bayer, arguing that because the EPA never required a cancer warning label on glyphosate, Bayer can't be held liable for not putting one there either. Never mind that the only major safety study the EPA leaned on to clear the product was just retracted weeks ago for its ties to industry. Never mind that three of the nine DOJ attorneys who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that represented Bayer and Monsanto. Glyphosate is sprayed on 80 to 90% of our crops. Over $10 billion has been paid out in cancer lawsuits. 97.8% of respondents to ICAN's poll oppose liability immunity for glyphosate manufacturers. 89% oppose the federal stockpile. And 80% say the retraction of that foundational safety study has shaken their trust in current safety claims. Del has been covering this since 2015 - before the lawsuits, before the WHO declared glyphosate a probable carcinogen, before any of this was mainstream. He saw exactly where it was heading. This is the same playbook as 1986. Get the government to grant immunity. Remove market forces. Remove the ability to sue. And then nobody has any reason to make a better product ever again. It worked with vaccines. They're trying it again with our food supply. April 27th. Washington DC. Supreme Court steps. The People vs. Poison. Mark it. Be there.
10:11

It worked with vaccines. They're trying it again with our food supply. While everyone's eyes are on bombs dropping overseas, something just happened in Washington that will affect every American sitting down to dinner for generations. The Trump administration's EPA filed a brief at the Supreme Court backing Bayer, arguing that because the EPA never required a cancer warning label on glyphosate, Bayer can't be held liable for not putting one there either. Never mind that the only major safety study the EPA leaned on to clear the product was just retracted weeks ago for its ties to industry. Never mind that three of the nine DOJ attorneys who signed the brief previously worked for law firms that represented Bayer and Monsanto. Glyphosate is sprayed on 80 to 90% of our crops. Over $10 billion has been paid out in cancer lawsuits. 97.8% of respondents to ICAN's poll oppose liability immunity for glyphosate manufacturers. 89% oppose the federal stockpile. And 80% say the retraction of that foundational safety study has shaken their trust in current safety claims. Del has been covering this since 2015 - before the lawsuits, before the WHO declared glyphosate a probable carcinogen, before any of this was mainstream. He saw exactly where it was heading. This is the same playbook as 1986. Get the government to grant immunity. Remove market forces. Remove the ability to sue. And then nobody has any reason to make a better product ever again. It worked with vaccines. They're trying it again with our food supply. April 27th. Washington DC. Supreme Court steps. The People vs. Poison. Mark it. Be there.

The HighWire

262,795 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie stood on the steps of the Supreme Court today and named what is actually happening. Bayer is running a four-front war: against the executive branch, state legislatures, Congress, and the courts. The goal is liability immunity, a permanent get out of court free card for a company that has lost hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer verdicts. Massie is not giving it to them. He and Representative Chellie Pingree have introduced the "No Immunity for Glyphosate Act," but as Massie made clear, it should not even be necessary. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states. The First Amendment protects the right to know what is in a product. None of those have been repealed. All of them are currently in jeopardy. The question before the Supreme Court is whether state judges will be gagged, state juries disbanded, and state courts shuttered, with no plan to hear these cases anywhere else. Massie called it what it is: regulatory capture. The White House chief of staff works for a lobbying firm that took money from Monsanto Bayer, and that conflict is sitting at the center of an executive order the administration is using to shield the company from accountability. The people standing on those steps today are the answer to that. Full clip linked below 👇
2:10

🚨Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie stood on the steps of the Supreme Court today and named what is actually happening. Bayer is running a four-front war: against the executive branch, state legislatures, Congress, and the courts. The goal is liability immunity, a permanent get out of court free card for a company that has lost hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer verdicts. Massie is not giving it to them. He and Representative Chellie Pingree have introduced the "No Immunity for Glyphosate Act," but as Massie made clear, it should not even be necessary. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states. The First Amendment protects the right to know what is in a product. None of those have been repealed. All of them are currently in jeopardy. The question before the Supreme Court is whether state judges will be gagged, state juries disbanded, and state courts shuttered, with no plan to hear these cases anywhere else. Massie called it what it is: regulatory capture. The White House chief of staff works for a lobbying firm that took money from Monsanto Bayer, and that conflict is sitting at the center of an executive order the administration is using to shield the company from accountability. The people standing on those steps today are the answer to that. Full clip linked below 👇

The HighWire

108,079 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DERAILED THOUSANDS of lawsuits against Monsanto for glyphosate causing cancer. In a 7-2 ruling, they sided with Monsanto and BLOCKED cancer victims from suing over missing cancer warnings. This is a GRAVE MISTAKE. Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.
2:10

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DERAILED THOUSANDS of lawsuits against Monsanto for glyphosate causing cancer. In a 7-2 ruling, they sided with Monsanto and BLOCKED cancer victims from suing over missing cancer warnings. This is a GRAVE MISTAKE. Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

121,875 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Thomas Massie just declared: “Americans are under attack.” Monsanto is “attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, and the courts.” “They want get-out-of-court free cards.” “My colleague, Chellie Pingree and I … have offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn’t even be necessary.” “We haven’t repealed the Tenth Amendment.” “We haven’t repealed the Seventh Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment, the right of people to say what’s in a product.” “But those three elements of the Bill of Rights are in jeopardy.” “The Supreme Court today, are they gonna gag state judges?” “Are they gonna disband state juries?” “Are they going to shutter the state courts where justice should be served?” “They’re proposing that nobody gets any justice.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto-Bayer.” “That is why we … are fighting the federal government, and especially the executive branch.” The People vs. Poison Rally is happening right now in front of the Supreme Court to fight back against Monsanto’s war on our right to sue them for poisoning us with pesticide. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
2:10

Thomas Massie just declared: “Americans are under attack.” Monsanto is “attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, and the courts.” “They want get-out-of-court free cards.” “My colleague, Chellie Pingree and I … have offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn’t even be necessary.” “We haven’t repealed the Tenth Amendment.” “We haven’t repealed the Seventh Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment, the right of people to say what’s in a product.” “But those three elements of the Bill of Rights are in jeopardy.” “The Supreme Court today, are they gonna gag state judges?” “Are they gonna disband state juries?” “Are they going to shutter the state courts where justice should be served?” “They’re proposing that nobody gets any justice.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto-Bayer.” “That is why we … are fighting the federal government, and especially the executive branch.” The People vs. Poison Rally is happening right now in front of the Supreme Court to fight back against Monsanto’s war on our right to sue them for poisoning us with pesticide. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

72,371 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Supreme Court is considering giving pesticide makers sweeping immunity from lawsuits. As long as the EPA says their pesticides are “safe,” you wouldn’t be able to sue them for causing cancer anymore. There’s just one problem: The EPA is captured by the pesticide industry. Stacy Malkan told Kim Iversen that the EPA often uses pesticide “industry data” to make their decisions on pesticide safety. And President Trump’s DOJ is siding with pesticide makers, urging the Supreme Court to hand Bayer and other pesticide corporations the sweeping liability shield from lawsuits they’re asking for. That would devastate American farmers, further entrench corporate power, and crush MAHA’s goal of healthier food. We just published a blog breaking down how this Supreme Court case is part of a much larger “misinformation and intimidation campaign” by Bayer, and why this liability shield would be devastating for American farmers. This is a turning point for America’s food system. Read our full blog below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan
0:33

The Supreme Court is considering giving pesticide makers sweeping immunity from lawsuits. As long as the EPA says their pesticides are “safe,” you wouldn’t be able to sue them for causing cancer anymore. There’s just one problem: The EPA is captured by the pesticide industry. Stacy Malkan told Kim Iversen that the EPA often uses pesticide “industry data” to make their decisions on pesticide safety. And President Trump’s DOJ is siding with pesticide makers, urging the Supreme Court to hand Bayer and other pesticide corporations the sweeping liability shield from lawsuits they’re asking for. That would devastate American farmers, further entrench corporate power, and crush MAHA’s goal of healthier food. We just published a blog breaking down how this Supreme Court case is part of a much larger “misinformation and intimidation campaign” by Bayer, and why this liability shield would be devastating for American farmers. This is a turning point for America’s food system. Read our full blog below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan

Farm Action

44,067 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

It’s time to take a break from local politics and head to DC. Tomorrow (Monday) the Supreme Court is listening to a case that would give immunity to pesticide companies if their product injures you. So I’m heading to DC for a People vs Poison rally in front of the Supreme Court. We cannot sit back and tolerate this.
2:34

It’s time to take a break from local politics and head to DC. Tomorrow (Monday) the Supreme Court is listening to a case that would give immunity to pesticide companies if their product injures you. So I’m heading to DC for a People vs Poison rally in front of the Supreme Court. We cannot sit back and tolerate this.

Anna Matson

20,135 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Bayer for failing to warn people about the risks of glyphosate exposure. Now, EPA Administrator Zeldin and Trump are pushing for legal immunity to protect Bayer from being sued by Americans getting cancer from their product.
3:38

Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Bayer for failing to warn people about the risks of glyphosate exposure. Now, EPA Administrator Zeldin and Trump are pushing for legal immunity to protect Bayer from being sued by Americans getting cancer from their product.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

71,455 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨This is IMPORTANT. The Farm Bill vote happening right now contains a provision that goes far beyond pesticide liability, and Dennis Kucinich came to the steps of the Supreme Court on Monday to make sure people understood what is actually at stake. The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether Bayer can be shielded from state-level failure-to-warn lawsuits. But as Kucinich explained, the justices are not being asked to decide whether glyphosate causes cancer. They are being asked to decide whether states retain their constitutional right to protect the health and safety of their own people. The 10th Amendment reserved that power to the states when this country was founded. The Supremacy Clause preemption argument Bayer is making, backed by the Trump Justice Department, would strip it away. The Farm Bill makes this worse. Removing the pesticide liability shield language, as some representatives fought to do, does not address the EATS Act provisions buried in the same bill, which would block states from setting agricultural standards stronger than the federal baseline, covering chemical use, animal welfare, and beyond. The Rules Committee refused to allow a vote on removing those provisions. That leaves voting no on the entire Farm Bill as the only remaining path to protecting states' rights over their own land, their own farmers, and their own communities. This is a constitutional moment.
1:57

🚨This is IMPORTANT. The Farm Bill vote happening right now contains a provision that goes far beyond pesticide liability, and Dennis Kucinich came to the steps of the Supreme Court on Monday to make sure people understood what is actually at stake. The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether Bayer can be shielded from state-level failure-to-warn lawsuits. But as Kucinich explained, the justices are not being asked to decide whether glyphosate causes cancer. They are being asked to decide whether states retain their constitutional right to protect the health and safety of their own people. The 10th Amendment reserved that power to the states when this country was founded. The Supremacy Clause preemption argument Bayer is making, backed by the Trump Justice Department, would strip it away. The Farm Bill makes this worse. Removing the pesticide liability shield language, as some representatives fought to do, does not address the EATS Act provisions buried in the same bill, which would block states from setting agricultural standards stronger than the federal baseline, covering chemical use, animal welfare, and beyond. The Rules Committee refused to allow a vote on removing those provisions. That leaves voting no on the entire Farm Bill as the only remaining path to protecting states' rights over their own land, their own farmers, and their own communities. This is a constitutional moment.

The HighWire

16,760 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“MAHA leaders feel absolutely betrayed.” The Supreme Court is considering handing pesticide makers a sweeping liability shield. It could give Chinese-owned Syngenta and German-owned Bayer immunity from lawsuits for causing cancer with their pesticides. And Trump’s DOJ is siding with the pesticide makers. Stacy Malkan just broke down why pesticide manufacturers are “desperate” for this immunity shield—and why MAHA feels betrayed by Trump’s DOJ: “The details coming out of the Monsanto documents showed many ways that they’ve manipulated the science, strong-armed regulators, and lied to the public [about] cancer links to their products.” “So now they’re in trouble for it, as they should be, and people are suing them.” “The Trump Department of Justice argued to the Supreme Court that they should take Bayer’s side.” If the Supreme Court sides with Bayer, it will only further entrench corporate power, leaving farmers with even fewer avenues to hold these corporations accountable and to operate independently. We just released a blog exposing how Bayer’s Supreme Court case is part of a much broader “misinformation and intimidation campaign,” how the Trump administration is betraying MAHA by supporting Bayer, and why this case is the ultimate test for the future of America’s food system. Read our full blog breaking down this momentous case below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan
2:12

“MAHA leaders feel absolutely betrayed.” The Supreme Court is considering handing pesticide makers a sweeping liability shield. It could give Chinese-owned Syngenta and German-owned Bayer immunity from lawsuits for causing cancer with their pesticides. And Trump’s DOJ is siding with the pesticide makers. Stacy Malkan just broke down why pesticide manufacturers are “desperate” for this immunity shield—and why MAHA feels betrayed by Trump’s DOJ: “The details coming out of the Monsanto documents showed many ways that they’ve manipulated the science, strong-armed regulators, and lied to the public [about] cancer links to their products.” “So now they’re in trouble for it, as they should be, and people are suing them.” “The Trump Department of Justice argued to the Supreme Court that they should take Bayer’s side.” If the Supreme Court sides with Bayer, it will only further entrench corporate power, leaving farmers with even fewer avenues to hold these corporations accountable and to operate independently. We just released a blog exposing how Bayer’s Supreme Court case is part of a much broader “misinformation and intimidation campaign,” how the Trump administration is betraying MAHA by supporting Bayer, and why this case is the ultimate test for the future of America’s food system. Read our full blog breaking down this momentous case below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan

Farm Action

43,038 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

He makes an interesting argument that Flock cameras violate the 2nd Amendment because they track people going to gun stores, gun ranges, and so they enable the Federal government (we know they have access to Flock data) to make a database of gun owners. As we know, if the government is ever going to attempt a gun grab, they are going to need a gun owners database. So, does the 2nd Amendment prohibit the government from making a database of gun owners? I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I found there are laws that restrict building such a database, and that the Supreme Court has never reviewed whether such a database violates the Constitution. On whether it is constitutional, some argue that even the Supreme Court is not the final decider of what is or is not Constitutional, since the government's power comes from the people. Popular constitutionalism holds that the people, through elections, juries, protest, and ordinary politics, also interpret the Constitution, and that political means can contest and eventually overturn Court decisions. So keep that in mind, too.
1:28

He makes an interesting argument that Flock cameras violate the 2nd Amendment because they track people going to gun stores, gun ranges, and so they enable the Federal government (we know they have access to Flock data) to make a database of gun owners. As we know, if the government is ever going to attempt a gun grab, they are going to need a gun owners database. So, does the 2nd Amendment prohibit the government from making a database of gun owners? I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I found there are laws that restrict building such a database, and that the Supreme Court has never reviewed whether such a database violates the Constitution. On whether it is constitutional, some argue that even the Supreme Court is not the final decider of what is or is not Constitutional, since the government's power comes from the people. Popular constitutionalism holds that the people, through elections, juries, protest, and ordinary politics, also interpret the Constitution, and that political means can contest and eventually overturn Court decisions. So keep that in mind, too.

Orwell Day

26,501 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Be a part of History! Vani Hari (Vani Hari) and Del Bigtree are calling on everyone who can make it to lace up, bring a sign, and march with thousands in Washington D.C. this Monday, April 27th. Because what's happening right now is not OK. It's not OK for the government to file an amicus brief at the Supreme Court on behalf of Bayer. It's not OK for an executive order to give glyphosate National Defense priority status. It's not OK for the Farm Bill to include pesticide immunity language. It's not OK to delay EPA pesticide reviews by five more years. It's not OK for state legislatures to hand pesticide companies liability shields. As Del put it: "We have to represent ourselves now. The more people that are there, the more powerful statement that we're making." This is a moment that will be remembered. Be part of it. 👉 Sign up at 👉 Take action and contact your representatives at the Take Action link on the site 👉 Grab a T-shirt to support the event - all proceeds go toward production costs We will be live-streaming the rally at starting at 9am on Monday, April 27th. Be there!
1:39

Be a part of History! Vani Hari (Vani Hari) and Del Bigtree are calling on everyone who can make it to lace up, bring a sign, and march with thousands in Washington D.C. this Monday, April 27th. Because what's happening right now is not OK. It's not OK for the government to file an amicus brief at the Supreme Court on behalf of Bayer. It's not OK for an executive order to give glyphosate National Defense priority status. It's not OK for the Farm Bill to include pesticide immunity language. It's not OK to delay EPA pesticide reviews by five more years. It's not OK for state legislatures to hand pesticide companies liability shields. As Del put it: "We have to represent ourselves now. The more people that are there, the more powerful statement that we're making." This is a moment that will be remembered. Be part of it. 👉 Sign up at 👉 Take action and contact your representatives at the Take Action link on the site 👉 Grab a T-shirt to support the event - all proceeds go toward production costs We will be live-streaming the rally at starting at 9am on Monday, April 27th. Be there!

The HighWire

15,933 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It is an undeniable fact that #Roundup #Glyphosate causes people to get cancer based on countless court cases and Elizabeth Burns-Thompson wants to stop the ability to sue - she works for the Modern Ag Alliance who is a front group for Bayer | Crop Science Bayer AG Monsanto. This is the front group behind pesticide liability shields in Kansas, Kentucky, TN and several more states.
1:01

It is an undeniable fact that #Roundup #Glyphosate causes people to get cancer based on countless court cases and Elizabeth Burns-Thompson wants to stop the ability to sue - she works for the Modern Ag Alliance who is a front group for Bayer | Crop Science Bayer AG Monsanto. This is the front group behind pesticide liability shields in Kansas, Kentucky, TN and several more states.

Vani Hari

12,908 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."
1:40

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."

ANI

50,879 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten