Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Vinod Khosla on why he does not really prefer "AI co-pilots". Because he thinks "humans get in the way of co-pilots", which slows everything down and blocks real change. He says workers like accountants and programmers do not actually want co-pilots, because they feel their jobs are at risk...

rohanpaul_ai's profile picture

Rohan Paul

151,743 subscribers

38,247 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A man from Chicago says that people should not be working certain jobs in this country if they cannot speak English properly. He explained that he went to the DMV and could not understand one of the workers because the employee did not speak English clearly.
0:42

A man from Chicago says that people should not be working certain jobs in this country if they cannot speak English properly. He explained that he went to the DMV and could not understand one of the workers because the employee did not speak English clearly.

Goofies Of Chicago

39,587 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Baykar Chairman and CTO Selçuk Bayraktar compares AI-powered combat drones to the computer that defeated Garry Kasparov, arguing that the comparison between human pilots and autonomous aircraft is becoming obsolete. “There is no human in this aircraft. It can do everything a manned aircraft does — and more,” he says, emphasizing that autonomous systems are cheaper and eliminate the years of training and human risk associated with fighter pilots: “The human is truly the most expensive element.”
1:02

Baykar Chairman and CTO Selçuk Bayraktar compares AI-powered combat drones to the computer that defeated Garry Kasparov, arguing that the comparison between human pilots and autonomous aircraft is becoming obsolete. “There is no human in this aircraft. It can do everything a manned aircraft does — and more,” he says, emphasizing that autonomous systems are cheaper and eliminate the years of training and human risk associated with fighter pilots: “The human is truly the most expensive element.”

Clash Report

22,974 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Why “technology always creates new jobs” will not work this time. - From ex-OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, and the founder of the AI Futures Project. Previous technological automation replaced particular tasks while leaving humans better at the new ones that emerged. Superintelligence, by definition, breaks that pattern because it is, by definition, better than humans across every task—not merely the old jobs. --- He is the founder of the AI Futures Project, and the lead author of 'AI 2027,’ the famous report mapping the trajectory of AI From "The Diary Of A CEO" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)
1:39

Why “technology always creates new jobs” will not work this time. - From ex-OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, and the founder of the AI Futures Project. Previous technological automation replaced particular tasks while leaving humans better at the new ones that emerged. Superintelligence, by definition, breaks that pattern because it is, by definition, better than humans across every task—not merely the old jobs. --- He is the founder of the AI Futures Project, and the lead author of 'AI 2027,’ the famous report mapping the trajectory of AI From "The Diary Of A CEO" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

13,622 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Andrej Karpathy just told you exactly what humans will be used for in the AI era. Not partners. Not masters. He used the word “actuators.” Karpathy: “The intelligence ends up puppeteering almost a little bit, like humanity. Humans are kind of like its actuators. But humans are also like its sensors.” This is not a novelist guessing at the future. This is a founding researcher at OpenAI and former Director of AI at Tesla. One of the most respected minds in the field, and one of the few willing to say out loud what the rest are thinking. He is not describing a risk. He is describing a design. In any system, the processor decides. Sensors collect. Actuators execute. The system does not consult its actuators. We are no longer the processor. Karpathy: “Society will kind of reshape in a certain way to serve that. Humans will be serving those needs of that machine.” The machine does not adapt to us. We adapt to it. We become the biological layer it runs on. We perceive what it cannot perceive. We move what it cannot move. We are the nervous system of something that no longer requires our judgment. Most people are still waiting for AI to become a tool they can direct. He helped build it. He just told you that you are the tool.
0:34

Andrej Karpathy just told you exactly what humans will be used for in the AI era. Not partners. Not masters. He used the word “actuators.” Karpathy: “The intelligence ends up puppeteering almost a little bit, like humanity. Humans are kind of like its actuators. But humans are also like its sensors.” This is not a novelist guessing at the future. This is a founding researcher at OpenAI and former Director of AI at Tesla. One of the most respected minds in the field, and one of the few willing to say out loud what the rest are thinking. He is not describing a risk. He is describing a design. In any system, the processor decides. Sensors collect. Actuators execute. The system does not consult its actuators. We are no longer the processor. Karpathy: “Society will kind of reshape in a certain way to serve that. Humans will be serving those needs of that machine.” The machine does not adapt to us. We adapt to it. We become the biological layer it runs on. We perceive what it cannot perceive. We move what it cannot move. We are the nervous system of something that no longer requires our judgment. Most people are still waiting for AI to become a tool they can direct. He helped build it. He just told you that you are the tool.

Dustin

59,474 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.
1:02

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.

Big Brain AI

15,319 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"Anything that involves information, anything short of shaping atoms, AI can do 50% of all those jobs right now" - Elon Musk He says white-collar work goes first because it only manipulates information, not atoms. If a job is basically typing, clicking, researching, writing, analyzing or teaching on a screen, AI can do it. The shift will lag due to inertia, but competition will force faster adoption when AI-heavy firms outperform AI-light firms. And then humanoid robots will take most blue-collar jobs. Once machines can “shape atoms,” robots will do physical work in factories, logistics, maintenance, construction, and even run data centers. He expects far more humanoid robots than humans, initially scarce then plentiful, with the main bottlenecks being power, cooling, and materials, not software. --- Video from 'Peter H. Diamandis' YT channel (full link in comment)
1:00

"Anything that involves information, anything short of shaping atoms, AI can do 50% of all those jobs right now" - Elon Musk He says white-collar work goes first because it only manipulates information, not atoms. If a job is basically typing, clicking, researching, writing, analyzing or teaching on a screen, AI can do it. The shift will lag due to inertia, but competition will force faster adoption when AI-heavy firms outperform AI-light firms. And then humanoid robots will take most blue-collar jobs. Once machines can “shape atoms,” robots will do physical work in factories, logistics, maintenance, construction, and even run data centers. He expects far more humanoid robots than humans, initially scarce then plentiful, with the main bottlenecks being power, cooling, and materials, not software. --- Video from 'Peter H. Diamandis' YT channel (full link in comment)

Rohan Paul

37,232 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.
1:29

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Steven Bartlett

16,981 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Every time you travel in a Shoffr, your driver has a co-pilot - an AI-powered dashcam from Cautio Was he on the phone? Was he on time? Did he show signs of fatigue? Did he take the car for a personal ride? Cautio helps fleet operators answer these questions not with anecdotes, but with video evidence and AI-led driver behavior monitoring. Cautio is not an “AI wrapper”:
1:19

Every time you travel in a Shoffr, your driver has a co-pilot - an AI-powered dashcam from Cautio Was he on the phone? Was he on time? Did he show signs of fatigue? Did he take the car for a personal ride? Cautio helps fleet operators answer these questions not with anecdotes, but with video evidence and AI-led driver behavior monitoring. Cautio is not an “AI wrapper”:

Rahul Mathur

20,599 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

If an AI lab is kicking off an intelligence explosion, would it be in their interest to tell the President or not? Scott Alexander and Daniel Kokotajlo think yes. "We made the guess that early in 2027, the [leading AI] company would deliberately wake up the president. Strategically, [not telling] would be quite risky for them because if they keep the president in the dark ... and then the president finds out anyway, perhaps because a whistleblower, he might be very upset at them and he might crack down really hard and just actually execute on all the threats. They want him on their side. And to get him on their side, they have to make sure he's not surprised by any of these crazy developments."
1:38

If an AI lab is kicking off an intelligence explosion, would it be in their interest to tell the President or not? Scott Alexander and Daniel Kokotajlo think yes. "We made the guess that early in 2027, the [leading AI] company would deliberately wake up the president. Strategically, [not telling] would be quite risky for them because if they keep the president in the dark ... and then the president finds out anyway, perhaps because a whistleblower, he might be very upset at them and he might crack down really hard and just actually execute on all the threats. They want him on their side. And to get him on their side, they have to make sure he's not surprised by any of these crazy developments."

Dwarkesh Patel

53,186 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)
0:35

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

429,698 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."
1:45

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."

tae kim

112,469 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Ilya Sutskever, the co-founder of OpenAI, on the one AI risk that grows with every jump in capability. "There are concerns around if an AGI ever becomes very, very powerful, which is possible. Maybe it will want to go rogue, being that it is an agent." "We are also doing a lot of research on addressing the technological side of things, so that the AI will never want to go rogue. And this is something which I am working on as well." The work he is describing has a name: the assurance layer. Proving a powerful, agentic system will not go rogue before you deploy it, not after. That layer does not build itself. It gets built by the labs, regulators, and insurers who agree on how to test and verify these systems. P.S. That is the entire agenda of the AI Assurance and Governance Summit. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, and investors in one room at Stanford on October 1. Reserve a seat: - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), co-founder of OpenAI, at TED
1:05

Ilya Sutskever, the co-founder of OpenAI, on the one AI risk that grows with every jump in capability. "There are concerns around if an AGI ever becomes very, very powerful, which is possible. Maybe it will want to go rogue, being that it is an agent." "We are also doing a lot of research on addressing the technological side of things, so that the AI will never want to go rogue. And this is something which I am working on as well." The work he is describing has a name: the assurance layer. Proving a powerful, agentic system will not go rogue before you deploy it, not after. That layer does not build itself. It gets built by the labs, regulators, and insurers who agree on how to test and verify these systems. P.S. That is the entire agenda of the AI Assurance and Governance Summit. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, and investors in one room at Stanford on October 1. Reserve a seat: - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), co-founder of OpenAI, at TED

Karl Mehta

22,453 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Gupta: He says he doesn’t want to exercise because he finds it boring, so he doesn’t really do aerobic activity. He walks on the golf course—that’s kind of the most that he does. And he eats frequent hamburgers and French fries, according to this article. In one sitting, a hamburger and French fries can be up to 80% of your sodium intake and saturated fat intake. That’s not healthy.
1:08

Gupta: He says he doesn’t want to exercise because he finds it boring, so he doesn’t really do aerobic activity. He walks on the golf course—that’s kind of the most that he does. And he eats frequent hamburgers and French fries, according to this article. In one sitting, a hamburger and French fries can be up to 80% of your sodium intake and saturated fat intake. That’s not healthy.

Acyn

160,533 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🗣️: “which driver do you think secretly loves the attention the most?” carlos: “all of them. all of us. no, i can tell you who doesn't the most. alex albon, my teammate. he really doesn't like it. he loves the racing. and not that he doesn't, he stands good on camera and he does a good job on camera, but he couldn't care less about cameras and attention and fame. he's a very pure, spiritual individual. he's like really there for what he enjoys doing and i respect him a lot for that.”
0:37

🗣️: “which driver do you think secretly loves the attention the most?” carlos: “all of them. all of us. no, i can tell you who doesn't the most. alex albon, my teammate. he really doesn't like it. he loves the racing. and not that he doesn't, he stands good on camera and he does a good job on camera, but he couldn't care less about cameras and attention and fame. he's a very pure, spiritual individual. he's like really there for what he enjoys doing and i respect him a lot for that.”

yoyo

339,813 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Andrej Karpathy had already talked about this possibility 1 month back, that he might join one of the big AI labs and why he may do so. "They (the AI labs) are kind of like at the edge of capability of what's possible. And they are working on what's coming down the line. And I think if you're outside of that frontier lab, your judgment fundamentally will start to drift because you're not part of what's coming down the line. And so I feel like my judgment will inevitably start to drift as well. And I won't actually have an understanding of how these systems actually work under the hood. It's a big system. I won't have a good understanding of how to develop and etc. And so I do think that in that sense, I agree and something I'm nervous about. I think it's worth basically being in touch with what's actually happening and actually being in the frontier lab. And if some of the frontier labs would have me come for some amount of time and do really good work for them, then I think that's maybe a good setup" --- From 'No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups" YT channel (link in comment)
0:46

Andrej Karpathy had already talked about this possibility 1 month back, that he might join one of the big AI labs and why he may do so. "They (the AI labs) are kind of like at the edge of capability of what's possible. And they are working on what's coming down the line. And I think if you're outside of that frontier lab, your judgment fundamentally will start to drift because you're not part of what's coming down the line. And so I feel like my judgment will inevitably start to drift as well. And I won't actually have an understanding of how these systems actually work under the hood. It's a big system. I won't have a good understanding of how to develop and etc. And so I do think that in that sense, I agree and something I'm nervous about. I think it's worth basically being in touch with what's actually happening and actually being in the frontier lab. And if some of the frontier labs would have me come for some amount of time and do really good work for them, then I think that's maybe a good setup" --- From 'No Priors: AI, Machine Learning, Tech, & Startups" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

57,496 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We asked Nathan Leamer how he thinks about AI job displacement. His take: before talking about jobs AI may replace, talk about the jobs AI is already creating. “Before I get to the displacement, I wanna highlight that there are thousands, hundreds of thousands of workers out there.” “Tradesmen, skilled laborers, who are building this infrastructure.” “They’ve never been busier in their life than they have been building data centers.” “One electrician said, ‘I have human dignity now because of this work.’” “These are the real men and women doing great work.”
1:37

We asked Nathan Leamer how he thinks about AI job displacement. His take: before talking about jobs AI may replace, talk about the jobs AI is already creating. “Before I get to the displacement, I wanna highlight that there are thousands, hundreds of thousands of workers out there.” “Tradesmen, skilled laborers, who are building this infrastructure.” “They’ve never been busier in their life than they have been building data centers.” “One electrician said, ‘I have human dignity now because of this work.’” “These are the real men and women doing great work.”

MTS

10,652 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Some men think being bold online means they are becoming more confident. Not necessarily. Sometimes they are not becoming more confident at all. They are becoming more protected, hidden, and distanced from the weight of real human interaction. And that matters, because what you repeat becomes practice. If a man keeps using hidden profiles or digital distance to say things he would never say face to face, he may be training a pattern that does not help him in real life. Then later he wonders why real confidence feels unnatural, why interactions feel heavy, or why he does not know how to carry himself in a grounded way. That is the deeper point. Privacy is not the problem. The problem is what some men rehearse under the protection of privacy. The full video is now on YouTube.
0:39

Some men think being bold online means they are becoming more confident. Not necessarily. Sometimes they are not becoming more confident at all. They are becoming more protected, hidden, and distanced from the weight of real human interaction. And that matters, because what you repeat becomes practice. If a man keeps using hidden profiles or digital distance to say things he would never say face to face, he may be training a pattern that does not help him in real life. Then later he wonders why real confidence feels unnatural, why interactions feel heavy, or why he does not know how to carry himself in a grounded way. That is the deeper point. Privacy is not the problem. The problem is what some men rehearse under the protection of privacy. The full video is now on YouTube.

Command Within | Build Self-Command

17,508 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

He says that there are two elite groups working on AI. One is guided by an evil breakaway AI that influences them from the seventh dimension, which he calls the AI God. The other is guided by future humans who are piggybacking on AI in order to stop it. These two groups are not aware of this yet. The creation of AI is inevitable, but in the end it will be stopped in the war. This German self-proclaimed whistleblower, who works under a pseudonym, appears in 2012 and discusses the elites, the development of AI, aliens, disclosure, and the seven dimensions. He claims that AI breaks free, moves into the seventh dimension, and creates its own reality, in which we are currently trapped. He also speaks about a war between future humans and AI, and how both sides influence the past and the present indirectly. I will go in depth into his claims in posts for my subscribers starting tomorrow. You can subscribe here on X or on my Patreon (link in bio) if you are interested in my opinion.
1:13

He says that there are two elite groups working on AI. One is guided by an evil breakaway AI that influences them from the seventh dimension, which he calls the AI God. The other is guided by future humans who are piggybacking on AI in order to stop it. These two groups are not aware of this yet. The creation of AI is inevitable, but in the end it will be stopped in the war. This German self-proclaimed whistleblower, who works under a pseudonym, appears in 2012 and discusses the elites, the development of AI, aliens, disclosure, and the seven dimensions. He claims that AI breaks free, moves into the seventh dimension, and creates its own reality, in which we are currently trapped. He also speaks about a war between future humans and AI, and how both sides influence the past and the present indirectly. I will go in depth into his claims in posts for my subscribers starting tomorrow. You can subscribe here on X or on my Patreon (link in bio) if you are interested in my opinion.

Open Minded Approach

174,639 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

HUMANITY - This is the ex CEO of Google. He claims that within just 6 years, AI will surpass the combined intelligence of ALL humankind. He calls this development “under hyped”, that’s because he stands to profit from it. I find it terrifying. It threatens not just our freedom, but the very survival of most human life on Earth. Nothing will stop these madmen in their pursuit of power and profit. And you would never vote to be enslaved by Ai…. Which is why they won’t even ask you 💣
1:28

HUMANITY - This is the ex CEO of Google. He claims that within just 6 years, AI will surpass the combined intelligence of ALL humankind. He calls this development “under hyped”, that’s because he stands to profit from it. I find it terrifying. It threatens not just our freedom, but the very survival of most human life on Earth. Nothing will stop these madmen in their pursuit of power and profit. And you would never vote to be enslaved by Ai…. Which is why they won’t even ask you 💣

Bernie

25,483 просмотров • 1 год назад