Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Walter Isaacson explains exactly how Elon Musk uses first principles thinking to build rockets: When young Elon wanted to send people to space, he first tried buying used rockets from Russia. They jacked him around - it didn’t work So he went back to first principles. He asked: Exactly...

719,127 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

The Edge Guy's profile picture
The Edge Guy6 months ago

👁️ Apply this to Hormuz. First principles: why is 20% of global oil moving through a 33km strait in the first place? Because nobody questioned it for 50 years. Elon would have built the pipeline. Everyone else just kept paying the toll.

Ricardo Celini | The Only Bet That Counts's profile picture
Ricardo Celini | The Only Bet That Counts6 months ago

Musk didn’t swallow Russia’s jacked-up rocket prices or Tesla’s felt patch excuses, he stripped everything to first principles on raw materials, physics, and true costs, exposing the 10x manufacturing lie hiding in plain sight. America traded rocket-shooters for more referees, guardrails, and lawyers chanting probably not a good idea. The few who still run the math then actually take the calculated shot? That’s exactly why impossible things get done.

"Listless" Little Brother's profile picture
"Listless" Little Brother6 months ago

But I was informed by noted genius detector, AOC, that Elon is an idiot.

LastKnownSurvivor's profile picture
LastKnownSurvivor6 months ago

@elonmusk "Can't be done" just means no one has tried to do it yet.

Neo Science Historian's profile picture
Neo Science Historian6 months ago

Spot on – Elon’s first principles thinking dismantled rocket costs by 10x by breaking everything down to raw materials and physics. Same mindset for Neuralink Blindsight 2026: strip the brain to fundamentals (neural circuits, mitochondrial energy, epigenetic reset via OSK). Grok confirmed my daily prep stack (creatine + magnesium + sunlight) as “rocket fuel” for the upgrade era. What’s your first principle for human augmentation?

Aipulse82's profile picture
Aipulse826 months ago

Watch How elonmusk talk about space exploration 🚀🚀 in 2002 when he was not so famous and rich even than he wanna go to space and EXPLore

Daniel Rachlin's profile picture
Daniel Rachlin6 months ago

Going back to first principles is often the only way when you're building something new. No playbook for that.

Doc 🧲's profile picture
Doc 🧲6 months ago

@elonmusk The fool didnt know it was impossible so he did it

Chaminda's profile picture
Chaminda6 months ago

Elon’s obsession with breaking things down to raw material costs based on first principles flips the usual “just fix it” mindset and forces ruthless improvements where no one else looks. That’s a rare kind of stubborn curiosity.

Phil Free's profile picture
Phil Free6 months ago

🫡

Yael Maimon's profile picture
Yael Maimon6 months ago

@elonmusk

UDO's profile picture
UDO6 months ago

@elonmusk Grok imagine success is not final failure is not fatal

MalindaSherwyn's profile picture
MalindaSherwyn6 months ago

Important Phrase! "We have more Regulators than Risk Takers", i.e., more unelected bureaucrats and agencies running roughshod over the People! WHAT HAPPENED TO @DOGE ?!?

Dean Rutherford's profile picture
Dean Rutherford6 months ago

In the corporate world , my favorite comment people would make in a meeting to avoid implementing an idea was to say “I don’t think that’s legal “ I began to think, everyone had been to law school until I realized everyone was just lazy and saying something is not legal, was a good way to kill an idea and not have to do anything.

TeslaTracker's profile picture
TeslaTracker6 months ago

The same breakdown rebuilt Tesla's cost structure. Battery cells were treated as fixed-cost inputs until Musk asked what each compound actually costs at commodity prices - lithium, nickel, cobalt, aluminum. That's how $/kWh dropped from ~$600 to sub-$100 in a decade.

DJP TECHNO's profile picture
DJP TECHNO6 months ago

@elonmusk So interesting how it all started and how it is all going. 😎💫☀️

Terry Anderson's profile picture
Terry Anderson6 months ago

The next long term problem will be that we have allowed all the companies and institutions to become too large. We have stagflation of ideas and innovation because of monopolies and oligopolies. We need to break all the big stuff up. Ma Bell gave birth to the baby bells.

ne.in's profile picture
ne.in6 months ago

@elonmusk Wow

🇬🇧 Richard F's profile picture
🇬🇧 Richard F6 months ago

. I'm using first principles . .

VittaX5's profile picture
VittaX56 months ago

I love watching Isaacson’s clips of Elon. I admire Elon’s train of thought and mind more every time. ❤️

HC's profile picture
HC6 months ago

@elonmusk This is how impossible things get done. But, If it can be done, then it is not impossible. So it wasn’t impossible 🙅

Emilio Cazadores's profile picture
Emilio Cazadores6 months ago

Elon has never built a rocket he has others do it and takes credit.

French Provence Lifestyle's profile picture
French Provence Lifestyle6 months ago

@elonmusk Most people optimize opinions… he optimizes physics.

Horlarht🧡✊'s profile picture
Horlarht🧡✊6 months ago

There’s definitely something real about that mindset. Elon Musk didn’t invent first-principles thinking, but he’s one of the few people actually applying it at scale in messy, real-world industries like aerospace. That said, I think people sometimes oversimplify the story. Breaking rockets down to raw material cost is a powerful starting point, but the hard part isn’t just materials, it’s manufacturing complexity, safety margins, testing, and decades of engineering knowledge. That’s where companies like SpaceX really differentiated themselves: not just asking better questions, but executing relentlessly on the answers. Also, the more referees than risk-takers line sounds good, but it’s a bit romanticized. Those guardrails exist because rockets do explode, cars do fail, and people can get hurt. The real skill isn’t ignoring constraints, it’s knowing which ones are actually fundamental and which ones are just tradition or bureaucracy. So yeah, first principles thinking is powerful. But what makes it work isn’t just questioning everything, it’s having the technical depth, team, and tolerance for failure to rebuild things from the ground up without cutting the wrong corners.

Estranged Quark's profile picture
Estranged Quark6 months ago

@elonmusk It’s called being a good engineer or architect. There are more in the world of those besides Elon you know…

Shukla Gi's profile picture
Shukla Gi6 months ago

First principles thinking explained so clearly. This is exactly why SpaceX and Tesla changed the world forever. Mindset of a legend

Tømmy. T's profile picture
Tømmy. T6 months ago

@elonmusk It’s how you engineer the future.

ShogunX's profile picture
ShogunX6 months ago

Someone says, “We need felt at the bottom of the car.” Elon: “Felt? Let’s talk physics, not decoration.” 😎

Laurie Bryant's profile picture
Laurie Bryant6 months ago

@elonmusk Exactly!! He takes things that people give up on or for some reason can not do and he thinks what is it that i need to make this work, then how am i going to get what i need to make it work? Then he makes it happen. He keeps moving forward and does not give up! Go ELON!!!

AndytheSliCe ツ's profile picture
AndytheSliCe ツ6 months ago

I do remember!

Tom Bednarchuk's profile picture
Tom Bednarchuk6 months ago

@elonmusk Me listening to a journalist explaining a first principle type engineer is like having a chimp explaining the twins paradox…

John Cronin's profile picture
John Cronin6 months ago

@elonmusk Physics doesn’t care about tradition.

XFOLLOWER's profile picture
XFOLLOWER6 months ago

@elonmusk ✅

Trix🃏's profile picture
Trix🃏6 months ago

@elonmusk @tweem 500k views

Related Videos

Walter Isaacson: If you don't want Elon Musk to control so many industries, you should learn to get stuff done too. “Why is Elon successful at some of these things, like getting 5,000 satellites up? He said we used to be a nation of really great risk-takers. Even the people who ran Boeing probably were risk-takers at one point. Not safety risks, but they were going to try rockets. He said everybody who came here, whether it was on the Mayflower or across the Rio Grande, they were adventurous, they took risks. He says nowadays we have more referees than we have risk-takers. We have more regulators than we have innovators. We have more people saying you can't do it, the lawyers, the whatever. He said it's made it so that our big military contractors can't get anything done. We can't get high-speed rail. I would think that the best way to make sure he doesn't have so much clout on things is for somebody to be able to build more electric vehicles. He built a charging network and then the US Government, Ford, GM, decided to build their own, and they've surrendered because the Tesla charging network works. I'm not trying to just sing his praises, but it would be useful if you don't want him to control the charging network in America, if you don't want him to control the Internet in outer space, if you don't want him to control rocket launches, to have Boeing and Northrop Grumman and others be able to get stuff done.” The 92nd Street Y, October 13, 2023

ELON CLIPS

2,517,175 views • 1 year ago

Walter Isaacson: Those who don't want Elon Musk to control so many industries should learn to get stuff done too. “Why is Elon successful at some of these things, like getting 5,000 satellites up? He said we used to be a nation of really great risk-takers. Even the people who ran Boeing probably were risk-takers at one point. Not safety risks, but they were going to try rockets. He said everybody who came here, whether it was on the Mayflower or across the Rio Grande, they were adventurous, they took risks. He says nowadays we have more referees than we have risk-takers. We have more regulators than we have innovators. We have more people saying you can't do it, the lawyers, the whatever. He said it's made it so that our big military contractors can't get anything done. We can't get high-speed rail. I would think that the best way to make sure he doesn't have so much clout on things is for somebody to be able to build more electric vehicles. He built a charging network and then the US Government, Ford, GM, decided to build their own, and they've surrendered because the Tesla charging network works. I'm not trying to just sing his praises, but it would be useful if you don't want him to control the charging network in America, if you don't want him to control the Internet in outer space, if you don't want him to control rocket launches, to have Boeing and Northrop Grumman and others be able to get stuff done.” The 92nd Street Y, October 13, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,733,622 views • 1 year ago

In 2002, Elon Musk tried to buy a rocket. The Russians quoted him $8 million per unit. American aerospace companies wanted over $65 million. He walked away from both. On the flight home, he opened a spreadsheet and broke down the raw materials. Aerospace-grade aluminum. Titanium. Copper. Carbon fiber. He priced each on the commodity market. The total came to roughly 2% of what the industry was charging. That gap is what first principles thinking actually looks like. Not "how do we negotiate a better deal." Not "who else sells rockets." Just: what is this thing actually made of, and why does it cost what it costs? The answer was overhead. Legacy processes. Layers of contractors and subcontractors. Margins stacked on margins. Nobody had questioned the price because nobody had questioned the structure. Musk decided to build it himself. The first Falcon 1 exploded 33 seconds after launch. The second made it further but failed to reach orbit. The third exploded too. Three rockets. Three failures. SpaceX was almost out of money. Musk put his last $35 million into the company. If the fourth launch failed, that was it. September 28, 2008. Falcon 1 Flight 4 reached orbit. First privately developed liquid fuel rocket to ever do it. Seven years later, they landed a booster back on Earth for the first time. Now they do it routinely. The cost per launch dropped from $65 million to under $3 million for a reused Falcon 9 booster. Everyone else was reasoning by analogy: rockets are expensive because rockets have always been expensive. Musk reasoned from atoms: rockets are expensive because nobody rebuilt the system from the ground up.

Peak Thinkers

160,641 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk explains his idea generation process in 2 minutes: "I tend to think of things from a physics standpoint, from a first principles standpoint. What would be the best way to accomplish something? And then pursue that." Elon explains how this reveals hidden opportunities: "That's also a good way to determine if something is far from its optimum. On rockets, for example, you could reason by analogy and say the rocket's gonna cost a certain amount because that's what prior rockets have cost. Or you can say: What is a rocket made of? What are the material constituents? What do they weigh? What's the cost per unit mass? That sets the limit asymptotically for what a rocket can be. So if you can figure out some creative way to rearrange those elements into a rocket shape, you can achieve a much better outcome." He shares a second source of ideas: "Combining ideas from different industries is really helpful for innovation. What have people discovered in one industry that can be applied to other industries? That's a great source of ideas." Elon also explains why he started with software: "The great thing about software or anything which just involves intellectual capital is that you and a few friends can just do it. That's why doing some sort of internet thing is great as an initial company. That's why Zip2 and PayPal gave me the capital to attempt more capital-intensive activities." He concludes: "Usually you just struggle on a solution. You try a bunch of things. Most of them don't work. Occasionally one does."

Jaynit

31,845 views • 7 months ago