正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Walter Isaacson explains exactly how Elon Musk uses first principles thinking to build rockets: When young Elon wanted to send people to space, he first tried buying used rockets from Russia. They jacked him around - it didn’t work So he went back to first principles. He asked: Exactly... show more
34 条评论

👁️ Apply this to Hormuz. First principles: why is 20% of global oil moving through a 33km strait in the first place? Because nobody questioned it for 50 years. Elon would have built the pipeline. Everyone else just kept paying the toll.

Musk didn’t swallow Russia’s jacked-up rocket prices or Tesla’s felt patch excuses, he stripped everything to first principles on raw materials, physics, and true costs, exposing the 10x manufacturing lie hiding in plain sight. America traded rocket-shooters for more referees, guardrails, and lawyers chanting probably not a good idea. The few who still run the math then actually take the calculated shot? That’s exactly why impossible things get done.

But I was informed by noted genius detector, AOC, that Elon is an idiot.

@elonmusk "Can't be done" just means no one has tried to do it yet.

Spot on – Elon’s first principles thinking dismantled rocket costs by 10x by breaking everything down to raw materials and physics. Same mindset for Neuralink Blindsight 2026: strip the brain to fundamentals (neural circuits, mitochondrial energy, epigenetic reset via OSK). Grok confirmed my daily prep stack (creatine + magnesium + sunlight) as “rocket fuel” for the upgrade era. What’s your first principle for human augmentation?

Watch How elonmusk talk about space exploration 🚀🚀 in 2002 when he was not so famous and rich even than he wanna go to space and EXPLore

Going back to first principles is often the only way when you're building something new. No playbook for that.

@elonmusk The fool didnt know it was impossible so he did it

Elon’s obsession with breaking things down to raw material costs based on first principles flips the usual “just fix it” mindset and forces ruthless improvements where no one else looks. That’s a rare kind of stubborn curiosity.

🫡

@elonmusk

@elonmusk Grok imagine success is not final failure is not fatal

Important Phrase! "We have more Regulators than Risk Takers", i.e., more unelected bureaucrats and agencies running roughshod over the People! WHAT HAPPENED TO @DOGE ?!?

In the corporate world , my favorite comment people would make in a meeting to avoid implementing an idea was to say “I don’t think that’s legal “ I began to think, everyone had been to law school until I realized everyone was just lazy and saying something is not legal, was a good way to kill an idea and not have to do anything.

The same breakdown rebuilt Tesla's cost structure. Battery cells were treated as fixed-cost inputs until Musk asked what each compound actually costs at commodity prices - lithium, nickel, cobalt, aluminum. That's how $/kWh dropped from ~$600 to sub-$100 in a decade.

@elonmusk So interesting how it all started and how it is all going. 😎💫☀️

The next long term problem will be that we have allowed all the companies and institutions to become too large. We have stagflation of ideas and innovation because of monopolies and oligopolies. We need to break all the big stuff up. Ma Bell gave birth to the baby bells.

@elonmusk Wow

. I'm using first principles . .

I love watching Isaacson’s clips of Elon. I admire Elon’s train of thought and mind more every time. ❤️

@elonmusk This is how impossible things get done. But, If it can be done, then it is not impossible. So it wasn’t impossible 🙅

Elon has never built a rocket he has others do it and takes credit.

@elonmusk Most people optimize opinions… he optimizes physics.

There’s definitely something real about that mindset. Elon Musk didn’t invent first-principles thinking, but he’s one of the few people actually applying it at scale in messy, real-world industries like aerospace. That said, I think people sometimes oversimplify the story. Breaking rockets down to raw material cost is a powerful starting point, but the hard part isn’t just materials, it’s manufacturing complexity, safety margins, testing, and decades of engineering knowledge. That’s where companies like SpaceX really differentiated themselves: not just asking better questions, but executing relentlessly on the answers. Also, the more referees than risk-takers line sounds good, but it’s a bit romanticized. Those guardrails exist because rockets do explode, cars do fail, and people can get hurt. The real skill isn’t ignoring constraints, it’s knowing which ones are actually fundamental and which ones are just tradition or bureaucracy. So yeah, first principles thinking is powerful. But what makes it work isn’t just questioning everything, it’s having the technical depth, team, and tolerance for failure to rebuild things from the ground up without cutting the wrong corners.

@elonmusk It’s called being a good engineer or architect. There are more in the world of those besides Elon you know…

First principles thinking explained so clearly. This is exactly why SpaceX and Tesla changed the world forever. Mindset of a legend

@elonmusk It’s how you engineer the future.

Someone says, “We need felt at the bottom of the car.” Elon: “Felt? Let’s talk physics, not decoration.” 😎

@elonmusk Exactly!! He takes things that people give up on or for some reason can not do and he thinks what is it that i need to make this work, then how am i going to get what i need to make it work? Then he makes it happen. He keeps moving forward and does not give up! Go ELON!!!

I do remember!

@elonmusk Me listening to a journalist explaining a first principle type engineer is like having a chimp explaining the twins paradox…

@elonmusk Physics doesn’t care about tradition.

@elonmusk ✅

@elonmusk @tweem 500k views
