正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We are all sitting in a room watching GLM-5.3-Flash write Blender script for automotive museum.

Lou

21,630 subscribers

44,446 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

32 条评论

Lou 的头像

Lou1 个月前

This is AGI.

Hadi Dbouk 的头像

Hadi Dbouk1 个月前

Lou, are you using specific rules and skills with GLM-5.3-Flash to make it work better with Blender? or are you just describing what is needed?

David 的头像

David1 个月前

We are all watching your videos and waiting for tutorials

Angel 的头像

Angel1 个月前

you need to share the prompt. teasing a lot ☯️

Daniel Pineda 的头像

Daniel Pineda1 个月前

WOW!! would share prompt?? this is incredible!!

basedcapital 的头像

basedcapital1 个月前

can glm-5.3-flash inspect each blender render before revising the script, or is it coding only from the initial description?

CAPET ☀️ 的头像

CAPET ☀️1 个月前

I used it for Blender it was doing mistakes non stop Switched to Claude Opus and job done in one shot 9 try => 9 times with mistakes

Spywrites💢 的头像

Spywrites💢1 个月前

I guess glm 5.3 flash gonna eat blender artists in breakfast 🥞🍳

Tyler Gibson 的头像

Tyler Gibson1 个月前

5.3 flash has been great so far for fully autonomous drone flights. Waiting for turbo mode!

Antoine 的头像

Antoine1 个月前

I am extremely curious about the agent setup for that. Because obviously we can’t just ask the model to do it blindly.

nickster 的头像

nickster1 个月前

glm 5.3 flash is the hype now

devin 的头像

devin1 个月前

TL is filled with this new benchmark

StaticAnalytics 的头像

StaticAnalytics1 个月前

So these annoying car shapes are a thing? I thought I was having a skill issue

BaKalu 的头像

BaKalu1 个月前

Stop watching, let's work on glm 5.5 please 😊

Justin 的头像

Justin1 个月前

Did he create everything on his own or did he had access to objects and materials?

adyingdeath 的头像

adyingdeath1 个月前

It seems that GLM-5.3-Flash is really good at building inside Blender. Very good vision ability.

Haleemah 的头像

Haleemah1 个月前

This looks really good

Nexcode London 的头像

Nexcode London1 个月前

Great model. We need an app that supports knowledge work. Then we can switch🫶

Juuso Jaakkola 的头像

Juuso Jaakkola1 个月前

drop the skill

Mr. Ånand 的头像

Mr. Ånand1 个月前

Closer to AGI

Felipe 的头像

Felipe1 个月前

We gotta start taking about the how already 😤

Conpertus HQ 的头像

Conpertus HQ1 个月前

Why blender? Why not something better?

Trust⭕️ 的头像

Trust⭕️1 个月前

How long to render

0xshot 的头像

0xshot1 个月前

can you share what was your instruction?

Masood 的头像

Masood1 个月前

Can you share the full work flow and how much does it costs?

Alina Fomina 的头像

Alina Fomina1 个月前

wow. impressive

Mesut De 的头像

Mesut De1 个月前

congrat

Mohamed Omar A WITCHER 的头像

Mohamed Omar A WITCHER1 个月前

HOW !!!!!!!!

Shibavoxel 的头像

Shibavoxel1 个月前

Did GLM-5.3-Flash generate production ready topology and baked maps for the vehicles, or is the result still a high poly visualization mesh that would need a human artist to retopo and bake before it could leave the look dev stage?

⚡️Boltbet⚡️ 的头像

⚡️Boltbet⚡️1 个月前

⚡️⚡️

yi 的头像

yi1 个月前

curious

老林学KOPI AI AGENT 的头像

老林学KOPI AI AGENT1 个月前

太牛了，我让kopi agent也试试

相关视频

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.

Lou

201,154 次观看 • 1 个月前

We use GLM-5.3-Flash build a dream kitchen. A 3D world built in Blender. This is not a generated video.

We use GLM-5.3-Flash build a dream kitchen. A 3D world built in Blender. This is not a generated video.

Lou

1,010,361 次观看 • 1 个月前

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Mia

16,546 次观看 • 28 天前

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash I asked both models to recreate the Psychonauts 2 and Metroid Prime game menus as closely as possible to the originals. Attached are full-sized videos from both models for both games. All were done in a single shot, both at Max thinking, same harness. Tokens used: DeepSeek v4.1 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 412k - Metroid Prime: 466k GLM 5.3 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 134k - Metroid Prime: 111k That's between 3-4x MORE used by DS4.1F. Who do you think won? IMO GLM 5.3 Flash won by FAR on both.

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash I asked both models to recreate the Psychonauts 2 and Metroid Prime game menus as closely as possible to the originals. Attached are full-sized videos from both models for both games. All were done in a single shot, both at Max thinking, same harness. Tokens used: DeepSeek v4.1 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 412k - Metroid Prime: 466k GLM 5.3 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 134k - Metroid Prime: 111k That's between 3-4x MORE used by DS4.1F. Who do you think won? IMO GLM 5.3 Flash won by FAR on both.

Mia

24,127 次观看 • 27 天前

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in

atomic.chat

32,515 次观看 • 1 个月前

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:

Vuk Rosić 武克

14,590 次观看 • 1 个月前

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

27,799 次观看 • 1 个月前

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.

Harrison Kinsley

54,330 次观看 • 23 天前

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

16,041 次观看 • 1 个月前

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

Baseten

23,114 次观看 • 1 个月前

A bunch of white people in the museum are sitting around watching whatever the hell this is 🤦‍♀️

A bunch of white people in the museum are sitting around watching whatever the hell this is 🤦‍♀️

Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸

26,954 次观看 • 3 个月前

I told you Local AI will be competitive. 12 / 15 sessions running on my machine rn are local, DS4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are better than anything else out there. So fast, don't complain, no rate limits. Why we gotta live like plebs?

I told you Local AI will be competitive. 12 / 15 sessions running on my machine rn are local, DS4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are better than anything else out there. So fast, don't complain, no rate limits. Why we gotta live like plebs?

0xSero

65,627 次观看 • 27 天前

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.

ego

24,535 次观看 • 1 个月前

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with

AI/ML API

27,304 次观看 • 20 天前

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇

SGLang

99,455 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient

Iam_

110,563 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing GLM-5.3 Flash for understanding research papers 🚀 Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references, powered by Z.ai

Introducing GLM-5.3 Flash for understanding research papers 🚀 Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references, powered by Z.ai

alphaXiv

17,430 次观看 • 1 个月前

some seriously good AI models are sitting at $0 right now 😳 KiosAPI is showing free access to: - MiniMax M3 - Kimi K3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. generate your API key 4. base URL: 5. select a $0 model > OpenAI-compatible API worth checking 👀

some seriously good AI models are sitting at $0 right now 😳 KiosAPI is showing free access to: - MiniMax M3 - Kimi K3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. generate your API key 4. base URL: 5. select a $0 model > OpenAI-compatible API worth checking 👀

K2S

48,763 次观看 • 1 个月前

We are all here watching #Bitcoin write history SOUND ON 🔊 🎥

We are all here watching #Bitcoin write history SOUND ON 🔊 🎥

Plan Marcus ⚡️🧡🍀

152,962 次观看 • 2 年前