Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

We use GLM-5.3-Flash build a dream kitchen. A 3D world built in Blender. This is not a generated video.

louszbd's profile picture

Lou

22,189 subscribers

1,010,361 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

ArtsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.
0:28

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.

Lou

201,154 views • 1 month ago

We are all sitting in a room watching GLM-5.3-Flash write Blender script for automotive museum.
1:00

We are all sitting in a room watching GLM-5.3-Flash write Blender script for automotive museum.

Lou

44,446 views • 1 month ago

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:
44:05

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:

Vuk Rosić 武克

14,590 views • 1 month ago

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.
0:25

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.

ego

24,535 views • 1 month ago

GLM-5.3 Flash in already nerfed? I compared Ox Alpha in it's prime vs today just before it got revealed as GLM-5.3 Flash using the same prompt to build 3d raptor engine using three.js OxAlpha on 24th August gave far more accurate output compared to today which looks way worse prompt i used: Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme background so the main object is clearly visible
0:28

GLM-5.3 Flash in already nerfed? I compared Ox Alpha in it's prime vs today just before it got revealed as GLM-5.3 Flash using the same prompt to build 3d raptor engine using three.js OxAlpha on 24th August gave far more accurate output compared to today which looks way worse prompt i used: Create a 3d SpaceX raptor engine using three.js, use white theme background so the main object is clearly visible

Tim Jayas

83,008 views • 1 month ago

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:
0:43

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Mia

16,546 views • 28 days ago

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.
0:24

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.

Harrison Kinsley

54,330 views • 23 days ago

Watch GLM 5.3 add a new page on my personal site in 37 seconds. The video is not sped up. GLM 5.3 at 200+ TPS, live on the Together AI API.
0:41

Watch GLM 5.3 add a new page on my personal site in 37 seconds. The video is not sped up. GLM 5.3 at 200+ TPS, live on the Together AI API.

Hassan

30,322 views • 1 month ago

Dreaming in Blender. Genuinely curious if Is this a 3D model? says this is a 3D model or not
0:26

Dreaming in Blender. Genuinely curious if Is this a 3D model? says this is a 3D model or not

Blue Nile 3D

86,895 views • 1 year ago

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.
0:33

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.

OmedTheVibeCoder

16,648 views • 2 months ago

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in
0:22

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in

atomic.chat

32,515 views • 1 month ago

Genie3 generates videos. We generate 𝟯𝗗 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱𝘀 you can actually use. Launching tomorrow — Tencent #HYWorld 2.0, an engine-ready World Model🚀 This isn't a video. It's a real 3D scene, all generated & editable. One image in. A whole 3D world out. 🔥Open-source tomorrow
0:27

Genie3 generates videos. We generate 𝟯𝗗 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱𝘀 you can actually use. Launching tomorrow — Tencent #HYWorld 2.0, an engine-ready World Model🚀 This isn't a video. It's a real 3D scene, all generated & editable. One image in. A whole 3D world out. 🔥Open-source tomorrow

Tengfei Wang

552,581 views • 6 months ago

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with
0:40

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with

AI/ML API

27,304 views • 20 days ago

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns
0:30

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

16,041 views • 1 month ago

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇
0:20

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇

SGLang

99,455 views • 1 month ago

This is NOT normal. Lovable just generated this entire animated launch video in under 2 minutes. Not a slideshow. Not a GIF. A REAL launch video. From one prompt. This used to take days and cost you $500+ for a video editor. We are living in a completely different world.
0:20

This is NOT normal. Lovable just generated this entire animated launch video in under 2 minutes. Not a slideshow. Not a GIF. A REAL launch video. From one prompt. This used to take days and cost you $500+ for a video editor. We are living in a completely different world.

Prajwal Tomar

148,162 views • 6 months ago

Stop. Breathe. This is Mars. Not a render. Not a dream. A nuclear-powered machine we built is standing there right now, in that silence, sending light from another world straight into your eyes. This is 140 million miles away from us!
1:00

Stop. Breathe. This is Mars. Not a render. Not a dream. A nuclear-powered machine we built is standing there right now, in that silence, sending light from another world straight into your eyes. This is 140 million miles away from us!

Curiosity

224,071 views • 5 months ago

To push self-driving into situations wilder than reality, we built a neural network world simulator that can create entirely synthetic worlds for the Tesla to drive in. Video below is fully generated & not a real video
1:15

To push self-driving into situations wilder than reality, we built a neural network world simulator that can create entirely synthetic worlds for the Tesla to drive in. Video below is fully generated & not a real video

Tesla

1,700,423 views • 11 months ago

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient
1:38

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient

Iam_

110,563 views • 1 month ago