Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

We are all sitting in a room watching GLM-5.3-Flash write Blender script for automotive museum.

Lou

21,630 subscribers

44,446 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education Gaming

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

32 Comments

Lou1 month ago

This is AGI.

Hadi Dbouk1 month ago

Lou, are you using specific rules and skills with GLM-5.3-Flash to make it work better with Blender? or are you just describing what is needed?

David1 month ago

We are all watching your videos and waiting for tutorials

Angel1 month ago

you need to share the prompt. teasing a lot ☯️

Daniel Pineda1 month ago

WOW!! would share prompt?? this is incredible!!

basedcapital1 month ago

can glm-5.3-flash inspect each blender render before revising the script, or is it coding only from the initial description?

CAPET ☀️1 month ago

I used it for Blender it was doing mistakes non stop Switched to Claude Opus and job done in one shot 9 try => 9 times with mistakes

Spywrites💢1 month ago

I guess glm 5.3 flash gonna eat blender artists in breakfast 🥞🍳

Tyler Gibson1 month ago

5.3 flash has been great so far for fully autonomous drone flights. Waiting for turbo mode!

Antoine1 month ago

I am extremely curious about the agent setup for that. Because obviously we can’t just ask the model to do it blindly.

nickster1 month ago

glm 5.3 flash is the hype now

devin1 month ago

TL is filled with this new benchmark

StaticAnalytics1 month ago

So these annoying car shapes are a thing? I thought I was having a skill issue

BaKalu1 month ago

Stop watching, let's work on glm 5.5 please 😊

Justin1 month ago

Did he create everything on his own or did he had access to objects and materials?

adyingdeath1 month ago

It seems that GLM-5.3-Flash is really good at building inside Blender. Very good vision ability.

Haleemah1 month ago

This looks really good

Nexcode London1 month ago

Great model. We need an app that supports knowledge work. Then we can switch🫶

Juuso Jaakkola1 month ago

drop the skill

Mr. Ånand1 month ago

Closer to AGI

Felipe1 month ago

We gotta start taking about the how already 😤

Conpertus HQ1 month ago

Why blender? Why not something better?

Trust⭕️1 month ago

How long to render

0xshot1 month ago

can you share what was your instruction?

Masood1 month ago

Can you share the full work flow and how much does it costs?

Alina Fomina1 month ago

wow. impressive

Mesut De1 month ago

congrat

Mohamed Omar A WITCHER1 month ago

HOW !!!!!!!!

Shibavoxel1 month ago

Did GLM-5.3-Flash generate production ready topology and baked maps for the vehicles, or is the result still a high poly visualization mesh that would need a human artist to retopo and bake before it could leave the look dev stage?

⚡️Boltbet⚡️1 month ago

⚡️⚡️

yi1 month ago

curious

老林学KOPI AI AGENT1 month ago

太牛了，我让kopi agent也试试

Related Videos

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.

We gave GLM-5.3-Flash a Blender scene and 12 hours later it built this.

Lou

201,154 views • 1 month ago

We use GLM-5.3-Flash build a dream kitchen. A 3D world built in Blender. This is not a generated video.

We use GLM-5.3-Flash build a dream kitchen. A 3D world built in Blender. This is not a generated video.

Lou

1,010,361 views • 1 month ago

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Mia

16,546 views • 28 days ago

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash I asked both models to recreate the Psychonauts 2 and Metroid Prime game menus as closely as possible to the originals. Attached are full-sized videos from both models for both games. All were done in a single shot, both at Max thinking, same harness. Tokens used: DeepSeek v4.1 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 412k - Metroid Prime: 466k GLM 5.3 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 134k - Metroid Prime: 111k That's between 3-4x MORE used by DS4.1F. Who do you think won? IMO GLM 5.3 Flash won by FAR on both.

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash I asked both models to recreate the Psychonauts 2 and Metroid Prime game menus as closely as possible to the originals. Attached are full-sized videos from both models for both games. All were done in a single shot, both at Max thinking, same harness. Tokens used: DeepSeek v4.1 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 412k - Metroid Prime: 466k GLM 5.3 Flash - Psychonauts 2: 134k - Metroid Prime: 111k That's between 3-4x MORE used by DS4.1F. Who do you think won? IMO GLM 5.3 Flash won by FAR on both.

Mia

24,127 views • 28 days ago

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in

GLM 5.3 Flash running locally makes a Minecraft black hole mod We ran GLM 5.3 Flash Q4 locally on a rented 4x RTX PRO 6000 box and asked it to make a lightning gun mod for the real game using the Fabric API Output: -7.6M tokens -Time: ~9 hours -Decode: ~96 tok/s The mod adds a black hole rifle, when shot it spawns a black hole that pulls in blocks, with light rings that shrink all the way into the singularity, then collapses into an explosion crater that wipes out several chunks Run GLM 5.3 Flash locally in

atomic.chat

32,515 views • 1 month ago

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:

Build & Train a GLM-5.3-Flash Model From Scratch I built a 25.7M-parameter educational model inspired by GLM-5.3-Flash, then tested its architecture, pretraining, and executable-reward reinforcement learning end to end. Repository: YouTube: Become AI researcher in 90 days:

Vuk Rosić 武克

14,590 views • 1 month ago

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

27,799 views • 1 month ago

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hybrid (GLM 5.3 Flash + Jev) on a turn-based strategy game (Halite 2) The hybrid approach is 13x faster, 56% of the pure GLM 5.3 Flash API cost, and gains a slight edge in performance. In the hybrid approach: -GLM 5.3 Flash handles strategic judgment of which planets matter, who expands, who fights, when to re-plan. -Jev handles the ship-by-ship execution. GLM 5.3 Flash alone defeats Jev alone 82% of the time. This is obviously just a single example and some of the first things I've tried to make use of Jev as an augmentation to an LLM. Could potentially make even more gains in cost, speed, and performance, but using what I've figured out here, I am compelled to try some ideas with robotics next.

Harrison Kinsley

54,330 views • 23 days ago

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

glm 5.3 flash is 7.5x cheaper, but 3.4x slower than gemini 3.7 flash Z.ai glm 5.3 flash – shipped aug 26, $0.07/$0.25 per 1m Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash – shipped aug 13, $0.38/$1.88 per 1m we put the two models on one job: write one html file that draws an animated 3d scene in the browser. no images, no downloads, and it has to look the same on every load. the setup: three scenes – a glass aquarium in a lit room, the solar system, a night city under a thunderstorm. identical brief word for word, reasoning effort high, 64k output cap. the numbers below are not the whole run. they cover the three scenes we kept – the best one per task from each model, the ones in the video. - total generation time for the three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 10m 36s #2 glm 5.3 flash – 36m 30s - tokens spent on those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – 110k #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 111k - cost of those three scenes #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.027 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.202 observations: • glm's first 10 attempts: 7 blank pages. it kept inventing short random helpers and forgetting to define one of them. the fix was one line in the brief: use exactly one random helper, named rand(), and don't invent shorthands next to it. next 12 attempts: 11 alive, 0 crashes. • glm spends 66% of its output on reasoning, gemini 57%. that is the whole speed gap. • gemini's storm came back as a black rectangle in 4 of 6 runs. glm's best storm has a branching bolt, lit rain and wet asphalt – for $0.01. conclusion: same three scenes, same token spend – glm 5.3 flash billed $0.027 and took 36m 30s, gemini 3.7 flash billed $0.202 and took 10m 36s. glm wins gemini on price and made the best storm of the whole run follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

16,041 views • 1 month ago

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

Baseten

23,114 views • 1 month ago

A bunch of white people in the museum are sitting around watching whatever the hell this is 🤦‍♀️

A bunch of white people in the museum are sitting around watching whatever the hell this is 🤦‍♀️

Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸

26,954 views • 3 months ago

I told you Local AI will be competitive. 12 / 15 sessions running on my machine rn are local, DS4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are better than anything else out there. So fast, don't complain, no rate limits. Why we gotta live like plebs?

I told you Local AI will be competitive. 12 / 15 sessions running on my machine rn are local, DS4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are better than anything else out there. So fast, don't complain, no rate limits. Why we gotta live like plebs?

0xSero

65,627 views • 27 days ago

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.

We tested GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash in Pi. Same task for both: use ego lite to build an interactive 3D solar system. Qwen cost 3.6x more and ran 1.7x longer, but the output tells a different story. Comment "prompt" below and we'll drop it.

ego

24,535 views • 1 month ago

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with

Space Bunny performs TERRIBLE in physics 💀 we tested Space Bunny against GLM 5.3 in a task with a single focus scenes: an explosion in a desert, a tornado, a balloon pop, a water drop fall, and the Newton’s cradle here’s what we got: - the Newton’s cradle is where GLM 5.3 totally cooked Space Bunny - water drop and tornado were the worst, neither of the models handled it price: Space Bunny: free GLM 5.3: $0.40 try it with

AI/ML API

27,304 views • 20 days ago

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇

GLM-5.3 weights from Z.ai are live, with SGLang powering day-0 serving support! GLM-5.3 inherits every optimization and feature we battle-tested for GLM-5.2 over the past months. On real-world multi-turn agentic workloads, we measured 537.6 tok/s/user on NVFP4 and 413 tok/s/user on FP8, at BS=1 with TP8 on 8x B300. It's fast, efficient, and production-ready today on NVIDIA AI Blackwell and Hopper, and AI at AMD MI300X/325X/355X. We believe this is a big step forward for GLM-Series in agentic tasks, with a path toward mythos-class cyber capability. Can't wait to see what people build with GLM-5.3 and SGLang🚀 Cookbook👇

SGLang

99,455 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient

Fable 5.1 xHigh vs GLM 5.3 Flash Max With Zai’s current promo, GLM 5.3 Flash is around 58x cheaper than Fable 5.1… and just look at the quality It finished the same task in about half the time, while still delivering a genuinely impressive result 58x cheaper. 2x faster. And the quality is this close That’s honestly crazy, Huge credit to Zhipu for bringing us models this efficient

Iam_

110,563 views • 1 month ago

Introducing GLM-5.3 Flash for understanding research papers 🚀 Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references, powered by Z.ai

Introducing GLM-5.3 Flash for understanding research papers 🚀 Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references, powered by Z.ai

alphaXiv

17,430 views • 1 month ago

some seriously good AI models are sitting at $0 right now 😳 KiosAPI is showing free access to: - MiniMax M3 - Kimi K3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. generate your API key 4. base URL: 5. select a $0 model > OpenAI-compatible API worth checking 👀

some seriously good AI models are sitting at $0 right now 😳 KiosAPI is showing free access to: - MiniMax M3 - Kimi K3 - GLM 5.3 Flash - DeepSeek V4 Flash getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. generate your API key 4. base URL: 5. select a $0 model > OpenAI-compatible API worth checking 👀

K2S

48,763 views • 1 month ago

We are all here watching #Bitcoin write history SOUND ON 🔊 🎥

We are all here watching #Bitcoin write history SOUND ON 🔊 🎥

Plan Marcus ⚡️🧡🍀

152,962 views • 2 years ago