Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
We gave four frontier image editing models the same photo and 30 edits in a row: Ideogram 4.5 keeps most of the room intact, while the others drift, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst most visibly. We've seen some interesting demos of multi-turn editing consistency from the latest image editing models,... show more
52,850 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)
9 Kommentare

95% untouched on a tulip vase edit is the number i care about

Best single edit ≠ best editor. Once edits stack, pixel preservation beats raw quality. Would love to see “% unchanged per edit” tracked on the leaderboard itself.

funny how they marketed Image 2.5 as the most consistent editing model

ideogram winning this is the surprise, nobody talks about them

Each edit looks fine. The sequence is where it falls apart

Ideogram editing locally while GPT re-renders everything each turn. That's your drift, right there.

so ideogram ftw GPT image has always been shite for consistency across edits

I already put Ideogram 4.5 in my workflow for edits.

"add tulips" shouldn't mean "change the whole room." the 95% vs roughly 20% gap is striking. i'd like to know what "unchanged" means here: - identical pixels - OR are tiny colour shifts allowed? that cutoff matters when reading those numbers.
