Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

"We had this philosophy when we started Circle that over the long run—the marginal cost of storing and moving value would go to zero, and that the business model of charging fees for payments would collapse." — Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire - jerallaire.arc "You don't get charged for your...

62,939 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Apple's Eddy Cue reveals the logic behind charging $0.99 a song when the company launched iTunes Store in 2003, despite the fact that Apple would lose money at that price: "There were two keys to $0.99 that we really believed in, and people didn't see." "Number one is when the price is $0.99, and it's consistent, you never have to think about price." "The second thing was that people could never do that, because at $0.99, if you're charging a credit card, you would lose money. Because credit cards have a fixed fee and a percentage that you pay." "Well, the fixed fee and the percentage you pay on a $0.99 song was like a quarter, and the vast majority of the [rest of] the money went to the labels. So every time we'd sell a song, we'd lose money. Nobody wanted to do that." "What we decided to do is, as we were building this — and it was a huge discussion, because we would lose a ton of money — we said, 'Look, this thing is amazing. You're not going to buy just one song, you're going to buy a lot of songs.'" "'And when you do that, instead of closing the transaction on every single one, why don't we just combine them over a period of time? Let's keep the transaction open for a period of time — let's call it 24 hours, or 8 hours. And everything you buy, we're just going to give you, then we're going to charge you at the end.'" "And that's exactly what happened. Very few transactions were just $0.99. Most of the transactions were multiple dollars. And the fixed fee didn't matter."

TBPN

2,404,178 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

When the value of your payment approaches zero, traditional overhead does not. With credit cards, you have fixed fees. With onchain payments, you have gas. When your payment is worth less than the fee to send it, the economics don't add up. You would be spending dollars to collect fractions of a penny. That is what Nanopayments, powered by Circle Gateway and x402 addresses. It enables gas-free, high-frequency programmable payments down to $0.000001 This is particularly important for use cases where transactions happen at high frequency and in very small amounts, such as: Agentic Payments: AI agents transacting autonomously at high frequency. Usage-Based Billing: Charging exactly per API call, per second of compute, or per dataset access. Machine-to-Machine: Services or devices paying each other directly for resources in real-time. Here is how the end-to-end nanopayment lifecycle looks like: 1️⃣ Deposit: The buyer funds their Gateway balance via a one-time onchain transaction. 2️⃣ Request and Negotiate: The buyer requests a resource; the seller responds with 402 Payment Required via the x402 protocol. 3️⃣ Sign Authorization: The buyer signs an EIP-3009 message authorizing the transfer. This signature is created offchain and costs zero gas. 4️⃣ Settle and Serve: Gateway verifies the signature and credits the seller’s pending balance. The resource is served immediately. 5️⃣ Batch Settlement: Gateway periodically collects authorizations and settles them in a single onchain transaction. That is how Gateway and x402 make nanopayments viable. To follow along, check out the Quickstarts in the Circle documentation and share your build with us! Circle Developer

Elton Tay

10,358 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

David Friedberg Breaks Down Zohran Mamdani's Win in NYC: The College Debt Crisis Has Led Young People to Socialism "It's really a revolution against the system that brought them to this moment." "Because the promise that we gave in America, the American Dream, was if you go to college, you will graduate, you will have income, you will have stability, you'll be able to buy a home." "And what we did is we increased the government's role in making that dream possible, and in doing so, we created effectively a system where we gave unrestricted access to capital, which inflated the cost of education." " People could go to school like Zohran and major in African studies and graduate with $200-300K of debt and then never get a job. The guy has not had a real job. And this is the truth for 32 million young Americans." " They all have what is called negative capital. They have debt and they will never be able to get out of that cycle." "So where do you turn in that moment? You don't go turn to corporations to solve your problems. You don't go turn to your friends and your siblings and your family, they're not gonna bail you out." "You turn to the voting booth, and you hear a guy like Zohran show up and say, 'There can be a better path forward.' The better path forward is the government can and should do more to help." "And in doing more to help, we will increase government, we will tax the rich, we will tax the corporations. We will take all of that capital and we will redistribute it in the form of services and checks and support for all of the people that find themselves unable to take care of themselves." "And this becomes a tipping point when the majority of the voter base ends up in that situation where they're that deeply in need, where they have negative capital." "And that is the situation America finds itself in today."

The All-In Podcast

470,973 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr