正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

we officially solved software products for AI UGC we already systemized physical products months ago.. skincare, supplements, gadgets, you drop it in and the ad comes out looking perfect software was a different story so it took me a bit of time because the text on screen always came...

34,517 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Ori Silver 的头像
Ori Silver6 天前

Dude your stuff is always so whack... It is evident that you dug super deep into perfecting these prompts and frameworks. Salute, really well done

Miko 的头像
Miko6 天前

means a lot coming from you!

katexbt.hl 的头像
katexbt.hl7 天前

not quite there yet but its basically a few months to a year of being pixel perfect at this rate

Miko 的头像
Miko7 天前

that small imperfection came from the upscaler, the raw output is actually cleaner, here is what it looks like without it:

katexbt.hl 的头像
katexbt.hl6 天前

wow near perfect esp when we take into consideration ig tt downscale content esp the less performing one

balubabear 的头像
balubabear7 天前

Best AI video seen.. HArd to believe its AI

Nick Ugre 的头像
Nick Ugre6 天前

How much it’s costs to make that video? 👀

Endrew Cruz 的头像
Endrew Cruz6 天前

something seems fake about all this

Masto 的头像
Masto6 天前

@eptwts How much time + $ per single video spent

Jonathon Dory 的头像
Jonathon Dory6 天前

What software produced the voice or is that a real voice?

zack 的头像
zack7 天前

crazy man!! really excited for the update. when its coming?? @Mho_23

Gaius ♦ 的头像
Gaius ♦7 天前

She's not a real person?😳

Perry 的头像
Perry6 天前

Tutorial?

kula 的头像
kula7 天前

I'm listening.

Zoey Bennett 的头像
Zoey Bennett6 天前

Talking-head mic then the readable app swipe already makes the software UGC feel like one real product demo.

Matt Caprione 的头像
Matt Caprione6 天前

Is this in the course already

Elsi Hametaj 的头像
Elsi Hametaj6 天前

SD 2.5 1080P to starlight 2.5 precise?

Ojas 的头像
Ojas6 天前

This is so amazing and great, Did you used eleven labs for voice?

Adam-the-builder 的头像
Adam-the-builder6 天前

How do i get this

Raymond 的头像
Raymond6 天前

It's not 100% perfect but this is dopee. Great work

Emre Özen 的头像
Emre Özen6 天前

@EXM7777 This is seedance 2.5 right?

Ryan O'Hara 的头像
Ryan O'Hara6 天前

This is 🔥 been trying with app content for a while and struggling to get good output. Would love to know what you’ve done here

john 的头像
john6 天前

Alight. I’ll bite. How?? Shilll me

Rishit Patel 的头像
Rishit Patel6 天前

How can I get access??

Pounds 的头像
Pounds6 天前

@eptwts Huge

Neon Eye 的头像
Neon Eye6 天前

the readable-text problem is basically the same wall AI agents hit with UI automation — agents that click through apps via vision models fail constantly because they misread button labels or state changes, which is why most reliable agent workflows still lean on DOM/accessibility trees instead of pure screenshots. curious if V4's text accuracy holds up on fast native transitions too, that's usually where OCR-based approaches degrade.

never 的头像
never6 天前

great work bro!

Sammy 的头像
Sammy6 天前

crazy good

Brian Hadu 的头像
Brian Hadu6 天前

systemizing AI UGC for software products sounds like a tough challenge

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide6 天前

That looks so real honestly

Ana Lee 的头像
Ana Lee7 天前

Physical products like skincare were easy to systemize, and honestly Doitong AI's text to video surprised me with how clean those renders actually looked. Now that software UGC is finally solved too, I can't wait to test this on my channel.

Brjan | AI Builder 的头像
Brjan | AI Builder6 天前

what challenges did you face while systemizing software compared to physical products?

noah 的头像
noah6 天前

love your stuff g, keep going

Jeff 的头像
Jeff6 天前

Damn

相关视频

In the AI era, the next great software distribution company won’t look like an app store For the last decade-plus, building a strong software business was mostly a game of scarcity. The hard part was assembling the capital, taste, engineering, and distribution to build one enduring app. The discovery systems we built matched that world: app stores, SEO, search bars, rankings, reviews, ads, marketplaces AI has blown up these constraints Soon, anyone will be able to generate software for anything: a workout injury, a work project, a personal workflow, a one-off analysis, a weird niche need only they have, maybe only in a single moment Some apps will last forever, but most won’t. Many will exist for minutes or hours, and be created even faster But just because software can be created at the speed of thought doesn’t mean everyone will become a developer. Most people won’t want to prompt, build, debug, deploy, or manage software. They’ll just want to be matched with the right tool for the job in front of them The same technological wave enabling software creation at scale is also breaking software distribution at scale. Search assumes the best answer already exists somewhere. App stores assume software is something you browse, compare, install, and keep In a world of personal software, the real question becomes: Who understands enough about me, or has earned enough trust from me, to know what software should exist for me right now? The next great app distribution companies may look less like search engines and more like trusted relationships Some will win by importing and processing personal context: your goals, constraints, calendar, body, files, workflows, history, collaborators, and intent. Others will win by exporting taste and trust: experts, creators, communities, agents, and brands that people rely on to decide what is worth using Either way, the new gateway won’t be a search box or an app store shelf. It will be the layer that recommends, assembles, routes, and personalizes software at the moment of need This is the new frontier: context, recommendation, trust, and distribution in the age of infinite software If you’re building platforms or experiences for this future, we want to meet you. Apply to speedrun. Applications for SR007 close this weekend Application link below

Josh Lu

11,390 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,434 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ford CEO Jim Farley on why it's so difficult for legacy car companies to get software right & why Tesla’s vertically integrated approach is the right one: “We farmed out all the modules that control the vehicles to our suppliers because we could bid them against each other, so Bosch would do the body control module, someone else would do the seat control module, someone else would do the engine control module. We have about 150 of these modules with semiconductors all through the car. The problem is the software are all written by you know 150 different companies and they don't talk to each other. So even though it says Ford on the front, I actually have to go to Bosch to get permission to change their seat Control software. So even if I had a high-speed modem in the vehicle and and I had the ability to write their software, it's actually their IP and I have 150, we call it the loose Confederation of software providers, 150 completely different software programming languages, you know all the structure of the software is different. It’s millions of code and we can't even understand it all. That's why at Ford we've decided in the second generation product to completely insource electric architecture. To do that you need to write all the software yourself, but just remember car companies have never written software like this, ever, so we're literally writing how the vehicle operates the software to operate the vehicle for the first time ever.” via Everything Electric Show:

Sawyer Merritt

1,172,994 次观看 • 1 年前