Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

We recently shared a case study of 30 different clinics throughout Europe utilizing our tech stack to be able to conduct clinical investigations in the medical space. In this particular example, as with many others, there are laws that prohibit the disclosure of certain types of data across national...

69,285 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"What is the cleanest way to compare Billions with other web3 identity layers and privacy layers?" The word privacy means a lot of things to a lot of different people. Often it is associated with consent, which is an action that you take that diminishes the privacy of a given set of data. Privacy is basically the process of information arbitrage, the selective disclosure of data in order to enable interactions. Although in a web2 environment, that "free" transaction of data often weighs very heavily to one side. When we talk about privacy at Billions Network, privacy is a static state, the absence of disclosure, or a way to describe the outcomes of mechanisms of data disclosure. We really focus on those instances where the selective disclosure of data is a question of legal compliance, of security, of financial value, where the decision to leverage this technology is not necessarily one of personal feelings, but rather of business efficiency, of compliance, and security. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025 In an era where AI is rapidly evolving, the boundaries of identity and privacy are being rewritten. Don’t miss our next Billions event in Shenzhen, China 🇨🇳 🗓 Date & Time Dec 21 (Sun), 20:00–23:00 Join a relaxed evening to experience our privacy-preserving verification and dive into the future of human + AI privacy In collaboration with: TinTinLand (TinTinLand 中文), Asia’s leading Web3 platform for developer growth and ecosystem acceleration.

Billions

20,164 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

How do you verify AI? Great question. I would invite us to take a step back to the fundamentals of the question we're asking here: Accountability requires identity. To manage counterparty risk with AI agents, we need to be able to have some accountability mechanism. That means we need to be able to identify instances of AI agents to be able to determine, for example, whether they're acting on behalf of a party that's passed KYC with an acceptable provider, whether they're acting on behalf of a party who is not on a sanctions list, or not part of the OFAC address set, and being able to verify that an agent is acting on behalf of an individual who's above a certain age. This allows us to deploy much more sophisticated multi-agent workflows and role sets. But of course, first we need to be able to ask that agent, "Who are you accountable to? Who are you representing?" This is also essential in a world where deep fakes and misrepresentations of real individuals are rampant. In fact, I actually had the personal and very weird experience recently of seeing a deep fake of myself circulate on this very platform on X. Additionally, my co-founder and colleague has heard about deep fakes misrepresenting him joining Google Meet calls and misrepresenting his person, his resources, his activities. So in order to verify who you're interacting with, especially when it comes to not only "Are they a human being or not?" but also, "Are they the real human being?" this again gets us back to the question of which identifiers are we using and how are they accountable back to organizations and entities who we know and trust. But happy to answer any questions that you have on the agent identity front. That's definitely one of the more frontier capabilities that we're releasing some awesome stuff around in the next few weeks. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

114,254 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

What does the reputation model look like for agents? (alpha leak below) And how do we associate the proofs that we have about human beings with the agents who represent them? You may have heard of a process called KYC or Know Your Customer. That's very common with traditional financial applications and services. We have introduced a concept that we call KYA or Know Your Agent, which is a structured way to be able to express what model, how data was used in training, who the deployer is, what entities this agent instance is accountable back to, providing not only provenance but identity of the associated organization or entity. That's also another root of trust that we think about a lot: Enterprises and organizations tied back to things like their domains. To share a little bit of an alpha leak here, a product that we're excited to be rolling out in the next few weeks will allow our enterprise partners to more easily verify and prove the traits and capabilities of their teams as well as their counterparties. On the agent front, that makes it really easy to prove that an agent is acting on behalf of a given business or entity. We've already seen lawsuits where the absence of such technology has been a huge risk, such as with airlines that incorporate ChatGPT wrappers in their support pages. And then those AI enabled interactions end up making up plane tickets that don't exist and those airlines have to honor them. As small of an example as that might be, being able to prove agent accountability also unlocks a huge set of opportunities for use in enterprise for those agent to agent interactions. The Deep Trust Framework that our team has put together that we're excited to be bringing into a friendly SDK form in the next few weeks for some of our partners includes those reputation based capabilities, so how you can basically keep track of the interactions an agent has had, associate all of that to the entity to which they're accountable, and then that creates a sustainable reputation model for these agent to agent Interactions. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions

68,458 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Iga Swiatek on constantly being filmed at Australian Open and other tournaments, ‘The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? It would be nice to have some privacy’ “I wanted to ask something that Coco was talking about last night. The cameras backstage at the tournament… I know you got filmed recently forgetting your credential… you’re sort of always on camera at a lot of different tournament areas.. I’m wondering if you think there should be more privacy for players and their teams as they’re back there? Or how you see the balance of that versus them trying to have entertainment and content coming out.” Iga: “The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? Where they are observed even when they’re pooping. Ok, that was exaggerating obviously, but it would be nice to have some privacy. It would be nice also to have your own process and not always be observed. For example, in other sports, you have some technical things you wanna do. It would be nice to have some space you can do that without the whole world watching. On Wimbledon there are courts where people with accreditation can get there but it’s without the fans. There are some tournaments where it’s impossible and you’re constantly observed. I don’t think it should be like that because we are tennis players. We’re meant to be watched on court and in the press. That’s our job. It’s not our job to be a meme when you forget your accreditation. It’s funny for sure. People have something to talk about. For us, I don’t think it’s necessary.” “Have you talked to the tournament about it here?” Iga: “What’s the point?” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

591,804 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith: "A Palantir program called Tiberius, which [is] used in Gaza... [was used] to assign risk scores... in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures [go]—as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, 'We're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you.' And then in addition... say 'We're going to put wearables on you,' they're going to monitor your body at all times—for the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "It's a giant web and it is going to be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply, how much we comply with it. Looking at who's monitoring the DNA, where they have to report the PCR results to, who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine, putting that all together and looking at, where are they actually, where are we reporting all of these PCR results and where are we reporting the COVID-19 case numbers? "And now we actually have a code to report, the COVID- 19 adverse effects, but it's still not being used. So looking at that and trying to figure out where the code was and why we're not able to report it still, I happen to find that every agency involved in monitoring COVID- 19 cases and vaccination tracking, specifically because there's so many vaccine registries, it blows your mind. "It's tied to national security. So it's a matter of national security if you participate in this scheme or not. "I think they're even going to try and do more data mining like go even further than PCR testing with the wearables rollout that we're getting now. Because the information, like when I learned that our COVID-19 case numbers, the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries and our DNA is being data mined and they're able to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make. Like they're layering all of this information. "And during Operation Warp Speed they had a program called Tiberius which was used in hospitals. There's different Palantir programs that are used in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to, like, staffing. There was even a program that was part of Operation Warp Speed called HHS Protect. And the hospitals had to report how many ventilators were in use, how many patients were there... "So they had this program that hospitals had to report how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU, how much remdesivir we were using. What's our census report, like all kinds of information that even the hospital didn't want to have to report, in addition to all the other data mining we were doing. And that program was a Palantir program, called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza and that's the one that they use to assign risk scores. "Well, they use that here already in America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines and then to figure out where the countermeasures as in where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the remdesivir need to go? So they've already had these programs in place that are tied into our medical records. And then to hear Larry Ellison say, we're going to use your medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design stuff directly to you. "And then in addition, they say we're going to put wearables on you. They're going to monitor your body at all times. For the purposes of national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine of every single citizen in this country."

Sense Receptor

19,193 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."

Sense Receptor

18,217 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

TBPN

57,054 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions

30,867 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

YOUR REACTION: Following vote to hold him in contempt for withholding subpoenaed Biden audio tapes, Attorney General Garland rages, says, "There have been a series of unprecedented and, frankly, unfounded attacks on the Justice Department." WATCH "We have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committees get responses to their legitimate requests. But this is not one to the contrary. This is one that would harm our ability in the future to successfully pursue sensitive investigations. "Now, there have been a series of unprecedented and, frankly, unfounded attacks on the Justice Department. This request, this effort to use contempt as a method of obtaining our sensitive law enforcement files is just the most recent. The effort to threaten to defund our investigations and the way in which there are contributions to an atmosphere that puts our agents and our prosecutors at risk. These are wrong. "Look, the only thing I can do is continue to do the right thing. I will protect this building and its people. "Why don't we respond? You can answer this just now, but I was wondering, like, you know, what these, this combined with the efforts to defund Jack Smith and the other attacks on Biden, administration officials say about, you know, the broader effort to discredit you and to discredit the Justice Department, and also, how would you manage that? How are you resisting that, and what can you do about that? "As attorney general, we have to go about our work following the federal principles of prosecution. As I said, we follow the facts and the law. We screen out outside inappropriate influences. That's what we're doing here. We're protecting our ability to continue to do high profile and sensitive investigations, and we will continue to do that. "Seems vanishing. The acts now seem vanishingly small that the two Jack Smith federal cases are going to begin trial, let alone finish trial this year. What does that say about the pace of the justice system and confidence in this Justice Department? "Look, the special counsel brought both cases last year. He appropriately requested speedy trials. The matter is now in the hands of the judiciary, and I'm not going to be able to comment any further."

Simon Ateba

710,407 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce