Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"We're basically going from making something scarce to making it abundant. - OpenAI Chairman Bret Taylor Just like electricity replaced muscle, AI is replacing mental effort. Quietly, everywhere. Once intelligence is ambient, the bottleneck becomes ideas, not access. Scarcity made intelligence exclusive. AI makes it disposable. We spent centuries...

rohanpaul_ai's profile picture

Rohan Paul

143,089 subscribers

98,266 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Ex-Google executive Mo Gawdat defines Intelligence. "If we accept that intelligence itself is not a physical property, then it does not matter whether that intelligence is produced on carbon-based computer structures like humans, silicon-based computer structures like today’s hardware running AI, or quantum-based computer structures in the future. Intelligence is produced within machines when we stop imposing our own intelligence on them." --- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Mo Gawdat' YT channel (link in comment)
1:01

Ex-Google executive Mo Gawdat defines Intelligence. "If we accept that intelligence itself is not a physical property, then it does not matter whether that intelligence is produced on carbon-based computer structures like humans, silicon-based computer structures like today’s hardware running AI, or quantum-based computer structures in the future. Intelligence is produced within machines when we stop imposing our own intelligence on them." --- From 'The Diary Of A CEO and Mo Gawdat' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

17,905 просмотров • 26 дней назад

SAM ALTMAN: “WE SEE A FUTURE WHERE INTELLIGENCE IS A UTILITY, LIKE ELECTRICITY OR WATER, AND PEOPLE BUY IT FROM US ON A METER.”
1:21

SAM ALTMAN: “WE SEE A FUTURE WHERE INTELLIGENCE IS A UTILITY, LIKE ELECTRICITY OR WATER, AND PEOPLE BUY IT FROM US ON A METER.”

Vivek Sen

16,846,982 просмотров • 24 дней назад

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”
1:21

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

Chief Nerd

26,614,953 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ELON: HUMANS ARE THE BOOTLOADER FOR AI "I made this comment some years ago, but it feels like we are the biological bootloader for AI. Effectively, we are building it, and then we're building progressively greater intelligence, and the percentage of intelligence that is not human is increasing." Source: Joe Rogan
0:23

ELON: HUMANS ARE THE BOOTLOADER FOR AI "I made this comment some years ago, but it feels like we are the biological bootloader for AI. Effectively, we are building it, and then we're building progressively greater intelligence, and the percentage of intelligence that is not human is increasing." Source: Joe Rogan

Mario Nawfal

29,587 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

ELON: HUMANS ARE THE BIOLOGICAL BOOTLOADER FOR AI “I made this comment some years ago, but it feels like we are the biological bootloader for AI. Effectively, we are building it, and then we're building progressively greater intelligence, and the percentage of intelligence that is not human is increasing. Eventually, we will represent a very small percentage of intelligence.” Source: Joe Rogan Experience
0:57

ELON: HUMANS ARE THE BIOLOGICAL BOOTLOADER FOR AI “I made this comment some years ago, but it feels like we are the biological bootloader for AI. Effectively, we are building it, and then we're building progressively greater intelligence, and the percentage of intelligence that is not human is increasing. Eventually, we will represent a very small percentage of intelligence.” Source: Joe Rogan Experience

Mario Nawfal

118,864 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sam Altman: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us.” Billionaires are using AI as a weapon to get humanity to stop thinking for ourselves so they can then sell their artificially controlled intelligence back to us.
1:20

Sam Altman: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us.” Billionaires are using AI as a weapon to get humanity to stop thinking for ourselves so they can then sell their artificially controlled intelligence back to us.

Power to the People ☭🕊

38,062 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.
1:41

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.

Jon Hernandez

20,577 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

For two hundred thousand years, intelligence has been the rarest resource on earth. Locked inside individual human minds. Non‑scalable. Scarce. Every advance in civilization — every leap in science, art, industry, and statecraft — flowed from that scarcity. Artificial intelligence breaks that pattern. It makes intelligence abundant. It makes it cheap. It makes it scale. This is not just another wave of automation or software. It is the industrialization of intelligence itself. When intelligence becomes a utility, it stops being a tool that sits on top of society and starts becoming the foundation of society. It is a transformation as profound as the harnessing of electricity — but on a higher plane. Electricity powered machines. Industrial intelligence powers knowledge. And knowledge shapes everything. This shift will reorder the very structures that underpin nations. The two pillars that define sovereignty — economic strength and security — are being rebuilt on a substrate of machine intelligence. Nations that master this new utility will not simply gain efficiency. They will redefine what prosperity, power, and freedom mean in the 21st century. For me, this is the central story of our time. It is not about the latest app. It is not about hype cycles. It is about the first time in history that intelligence itself — the raw material of progress — has become infinite and industrial. The question is not whether it will transform society. It already is. The question is who will shape that transformation.
1:04

For two hundred thousand years, intelligence has been the rarest resource on earth. Locked inside individual human minds. Non‑scalable. Scarce. Every advance in civilization — every leap in science, art, industry, and statecraft — flowed from that scarcity. Artificial intelligence breaks that pattern. It makes intelligence abundant. It makes it cheap. It makes it scale. This is not just another wave of automation or software. It is the industrialization of intelligence itself. When intelligence becomes a utility, it stops being a tool that sits on top of society and starts becoming the foundation of society. It is a transformation as profound as the harnessing of electricity — but on a higher plane. Electricity powered machines. Industrial intelligence powers knowledge. And knowledge shapes everything. This shift will reorder the very structures that underpin nations. The two pillars that define sovereignty — economic strength and security — are being rebuilt on a substrate of machine intelligence. Nations that master this new utility will not simply gain efficiency. They will redefine what prosperity, power, and freedom mean in the 21st century. For me, this is the central story of our time. It is not about the latest app. It is not about hype cycles. It is about the first time in history that intelligence itself — the raw material of progress — has become infinite and industrial. The question is not whether it will transform society. It already is. The question is who will shape that transformation.

Nina Schick

123,174 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

AI is evolving FAST. From agentic AI to physical AI, one thing remains the same: it needs data to grow. Nodepay is building the infrastructure that feeds AI with the intelligence it needs. The demand is massive—the opportunity is even bigger. 🎥👇
0:20

AI is evolving FAST. From agentic AI to physical AI, one thing remains the same: it needs data to grow. Nodepay is building the infrastructure that feeds AI with the intelligence it needs. The demand is massive—the opportunity is even bigger. 🎥👇

Nodepay

78,830 просмотров • 1 год назад

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.
0:43

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.

Famous Labs

3,455,577 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.
0:34

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.

Famous Labs

454,003 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.
0:35

💀AI IS DEAD. It was never alive. Predicting the past isn’t intelligence. It’s mimicry. Now something else is waking up... SYNTHETIC INTELLIGENCE.

Famous Labs

125,488 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.
3:48

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.

𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

40,208 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

OpenAI President, Greg Brockman: By 2030, AI will enable a world of "material abundance" but also one of "absolute compute scarcity" "the real bottleneck isn't software, it's infrastructure" So we want to increase the intelligence, but also the availability of that intelligence
0:58

OpenAI President, Greg Brockman: By 2030, AI will enable a world of "material abundance" but also one of "absolute compute scarcity" "the real bottleneck isn't software, it's infrastructure" So we want to increase the intelligence, but also the availability of that intelligence

Haider.

180,487 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Terence Tao has an IQ above 200. Youngest gold medalist in Math Olympiad history. Fields Medal winner. The greatest living mathematician by nearly any measure. And he just said something most people aren’t ready for. Tao: “This whole era of AI is teaching us that our idea of what intelligence is, is not really accurate.” We spent centuries building civilization on one assumption. That intelligence was sacred. Irreducible. Uniquely ours. The one thing that made the entire human story make sense. Then AI started solving things we swore only we could. Chess. Language. Vision. Math. And every time, we reached for the same defense. That’s not real intelligence. It’s just tricks. Just pattern matching. Just an algorithm. Tao: “You look at how it’s done and it doesn’t feel like intelligence.” So we moved the line. Again. And again. And again. Because intelligence was supposed to feel like something. Something deep. Something we could point to and say… this is what separates us from everything else. But AI kept solving the problems. And that feeling never arrived. Tao: “We were looking for some elusive, intelligent way of thinking and we don’t see it in the tools that actually solve our goals.” Here’s what makes it worse. Large language models work by predicting the next word. One word at a time. No grand architecture. No deep understanding. Just probability. And it works. Tao: “Maybe that’s actually a lot of what humans do as well.” The greatest living mathematician just told you human thought might run on the same machinery. Not some transcendent spark. Pattern recognition. Prediction. One thought, one decision, one word at a time. We built religion around intelligence. Philosophy around it. An entire species identity around it. And a machine running probability just held up a mirror. We didn’t lose intelligence to AI. We just finally saw what it always was. What haunts us isn’t that machines learned to think. It’s that thinking was never what we needed it to be.
1:19

Terence Tao has an IQ above 200. Youngest gold medalist in Math Olympiad history. Fields Medal winner. The greatest living mathematician by nearly any measure. And he just said something most people aren’t ready for. Tao: “This whole era of AI is teaching us that our idea of what intelligence is, is not really accurate.” We spent centuries building civilization on one assumption. That intelligence was sacred. Irreducible. Uniquely ours. The one thing that made the entire human story make sense. Then AI started solving things we swore only we could. Chess. Language. Vision. Math. And every time, we reached for the same defense. That’s not real intelligence. It’s just tricks. Just pattern matching. Just an algorithm. Tao: “You look at how it’s done and it doesn’t feel like intelligence.” So we moved the line. Again. And again. And again. Because intelligence was supposed to feel like something. Something deep. Something we could point to and say… this is what separates us from everything else. But AI kept solving the problems. And that feeling never arrived. Tao: “We were looking for some elusive, intelligent way of thinking and we don’t see it in the tools that actually solve our goals.” Here’s what makes it worse. Large language models work by predicting the next word. One word at a time. No grand architecture. No deep understanding. Just probability. And it works. Tao: “Maybe that’s actually a lot of what humans do as well.” The greatest living mathematician just told you human thought might run on the same machinery. Not some transcendent spark. Pattern recognition. Prediction. One thought, one decision, one word at a time. We built religion around intelligence. Philosophy around it. An entire species identity around it. And a machine running probability just held up a mirror. We didn’t lose intelligence to AI. We just finally saw what it always was. What haunts us isn’t that machines learned to think. It’s that thinking was never what we needed it to be.

Dustin

561,801 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

From why Apple isn’t making big promises, to signs that OpenAI is making real money, this is AI Weekly, where we round up the week's big stories from the AI revolution
2:27

From why Apple isn’t making big promises, to signs that OpenAI is making real money, this is AI Weekly, where we round up the week's big stories from the AI revolution

Reuters

20,568 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I think one of the truths is that the demand for AI intelligence and smarter AI intelligence is going to be insatiable. Some people disagree that once we reach certain thresholds then you don't need more intelligence. To that I ask people, 'Have you ever worked with or managed someone in a work environment and wouldn't press a button to make them smarter?'" George elaborates on his thesis that the demand for smarter AI intelligence will only increase over time even as models get more powerful. George Cameron
0:52

"I think one of the truths is that the demand for AI intelligence and smarter AI intelligence is going to be insatiable. Some people disagree that once we reach certain thresholds then you don't need more intelligence. To that I ask people, 'Have you ever worked with or managed someone in a work environment and wouldn't press a button to make them smarter?'" George elaborates on his thesis that the demand for smarter AI intelligence will only increase over time even as models get more powerful. George Cameron

Latent.Space

10,629 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Your laptop becomes the AI startup. It’s the shift from “renting intelligence” → “owning intelligence.” And that’s a big deal.
0:38

Your laptop becomes the AI startup. It’s the shift from “renting intelligence” → “owning intelligence.” And that’s a big deal.

0xMarioNawfal

82,586 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sari Azout says the term “artificial intelligence” is a branding error from 1955. LLMs aren't artificial. They're collective intelligence: just better ways of aggregating what humans already know and have made. “Changing your vocabulary can change your reality.” Maybe the fear around AI doesn't come from what it does, but from what we've chosen to call it.
2:44

Sari Azout says the term “artificial intelligence” is a branding error from 1955. LLMs aren't artificial. They're collective intelligence: just better ways of aggregating what humans already know and have made. “Changing your vocabulary can change your reality.” Maybe the fear around AI doesn't come from what it does, but from what we've chosen to call it.

vitrupo

123,988 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад