正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"What do startup CTOs search for on Google?" Google - doesn't provide good answers OpenAI - wordy, unverifiable, too broad, no volume data, not useful SEMRush/Ahrefs/Moz - gives you KWs related to "startup CTO" (which isn't quite the same thing) But... 👇👇👇

Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads)

466,736 subscribers

14,749 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Anand Dugar, MD 的头像

Anand Dugar, MD2 年前

Do you do any 1:1 consultation?

Noah Kain | SEO Consultant 🔎 的头像

Noah Kain | SEO Consultant 🔎2 年前

Incredible feature! Pumped to use this

I am 的头像

I am2 年前

Hi Rand! Long time follower here (since moz times). How it works?

SpyQueries 的头像

SpyQueries2 年前

Fascinating insights, @randfish! It does seem like there's a gap in the market for deep, authentic search queries. I wonder if a tool that combines the specificity of SEMRush/Moz with the broad understanding of OpenAI would do the trick?

Steven B. Reid 的头像

Steven B. Reid2 年前

Wonderful feature! Let's stay ahead of the curve together!

Will Critchlow 的头像

Will Critchlow2 年前

this is super cool. When does v2 come out?

Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads) 的头像

Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads)2 年前

It's in beta now: Public launch is (hopefully) early April

Valentin Pletzer 的头像

Valentin Pletzer2 年前

impressive!

Miguel Salcido 的头像

Miguel Salcido2 年前

This solves a very real problem people are facing. But are the terms just pulled from their bios or from other places? And are they pulling from mulitple bios on various sites (LinkedIn, X, etc.)? Just wondering where the data is coming from exactly.

brik.dm 的头像

brik.dm2 年前

Seems I don't have access to v2 :(

Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads) 的头像

Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads)2 年前

If you have a paid account, there's a banner across the top of the screen that will take you there!

相关视频

🚨 New Google Trends feature to rank faster (GPT-6 automated👇) - Open Google Trends - Ignore the search box - Click CATEGORY (THIS is the new feature) - Select your category (There are hundreds) - Pick a trending topic and click on it - Pick a more specific topic (THIS IS GOLD) - Write content about it This will let you find trending keywords your competitors have not targeted yet, because they are focused on Ahrefs, which takes weeks or months to update

🚨 New Google Trends feature to rank faster (GPT-6 automated👇) - Open Google Trends - Ignore the search box - Click CATEGORY (THIS is the new feature) - Select your category (There are hundreds) - Pick a trending topic and click on it - Pick a more specific topic (THIS IS GOLD) - Write content about it This will let you find trending keywords your competitors have not targeted yet, because they are focused on Ahrefs, which takes weeks or months to update

borja

44,938 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 Early $GOOGL & $META investor Roger McNamee: “AI is not a small bubble. It’s a humongous bubble.” “$1.4T has already been spent trying to build a general-purpose technology, which will never happen.” “OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon & SpaceX are all competing for the same 2 spots in the AI marketplace.” “There is no moat. They all have the same technology and are competing for the same customer.” “How do you think that’s going to end?” His full investment thesis:👇

🚨 Early $GOOGL & $META investor Roger McNamee: “AI is not a small bubble. It’s a humongous bubble.” “$1.4T has already been spent trying to build a general-purpose technology, which will never happen.” “OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon & SpaceX are all competing for the same 2 spots in the AI marketplace.” “There is no moat. They all have the same technology and are competing for the same customer.” “How do you think that’s going to end?” His full investment thesis:👇

Noah

45,389 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."

Fireside Alpha

276,575 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dominate Google Search by reverse-engineering your competitors with Gemini and NotebookLM. No more manual keyword guesswork. No more content that fails to rank. Here’s the new play 👇 → Map the top 10 search results to find hidden content gaps. → Use Gemini to identify exactly what Google rewards today. → Build a centralized AI research database in NotebookLM. → Create high-authority outlines based on real ranking data. → Scale expert-level content with data-backed citations. Save this post. The SEO landscape is shifting faster than ever. Want the full guide? DM me.

Dominate Google Search by reverse-engineering your competitors with Gemini and NotebookLM. No more manual keyword guesswork. No more content that fails to rank. Here’s the new play 👇 → Map the top 10 search results to find hidden content gaps. → Use Gemini to identify exactly what Google rewards today. → Build a centralized AI research database in NotebookLM. → Create high-authority outlines based on real ranking data. → Scale expert-level content with data-backed citations. Save this post. The SEO landscape is shifting faster than ever. Want the full guide? DM me.

Julian Goldie SEO

16,618 次观看 • 9 个月前

David Friedberg: OpenAI’s rise is the best thing that ever happened to Google “No greater blessing has ever happened to Alphabet than OpenAI's rise.” “Not only did it create the foil for Google in the monopoly sense, but it also took the attention away from Google, focused it on OpenAI, and that attention fundamentally damaged OpenAI's strategic product capabilities because they had to start to be so much more careful about what they said and how they said it.” “And the opposite was happening at Google at the same time, which is Larry, Sergey and Sundar being given permission by the board to take risks, to go hard, to figure this out. And boom! It's amazing how the horse race has changed.” “The reason Google didn't lean into AI for years, even though they had the technology, is because they were nervous about cannibalization to search, they were nervous about the quality of the product, they didn't want to release things too early, and then they changed their posture.” “Which, by the way, I would argue is the opposite at OpenAI in the last couple months.” “I used to use advanced voice on ChatGPT all the time. I cannot stand it anymore. I do not use it.” “It has basically hedged away all of the value because it tries to be polite, it tries to make sure that it's giving you warnings all the time.” “It doesn't want to give you data because it's scared that it might give you the wrong data.” “OpenAI has been acting like an incumbent fearful of losing market share and fearful of getting attacked in the media and attacked by consumers for saying the wrong thing.” “And so they've taken this kind of defensive posture that I think has fundamentally damaged the product and the brand.”

The All-In Podcast

108,091 次观看 • 9 个月前

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Ricardo

50,741 次观看 • 8 个月前

Paul Graham’s advice for future startup founders: “Just learn” “If you make a conscious effort to try and think of startup ideas, you will think of ideas that are not only bad but bad and plausible-sounding—meaning you and everybody else will be fooled by them and you’ll waste a lot of time before realizing they’re no good.” As Paul Graham explains, the way to come up with good startup ideas is to take a step back: “Instead of trying to make a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, turn your brain into the type that has startup ideas unconsciously.” You do this by: 1. Learning a lot about things that matter 2. Working on problems that interest you 3. With people you like and respect (this is incidentally how you get co-founders at the same time as the idea) “The component of entrepreneurship that really matters is domain expertise. Larry Page is Larry Page because he was an expert on search. And he became an expert on search because he was genuinely interested in it, not because of some ulterior motive.” PG continues: “At its best, starting a startup is merely an ulterior motive for curiosity, and you’ll do it best if you introduce the ulterior motive at the end of the process. So here is the ultimate advice for young, would-be startup founders reduced to two words: Just learn.” Video source: Y Combinator (2017)

Paul Graham’s advice for future startup founders: “Just learn” “If you make a conscious effort to try and think of startup ideas, you will think of ideas that are not only bad but bad and plausible-sounding—meaning you and everybody else will be fooled by them and you’ll waste a lot of time before realizing they’re no good.” As Paul Graham explains, the way to come up with good startup ideas is to take a step back: “Instead of trying to make a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, turn your brain into the type that has startup ideas unconsciously.” You do this by: 1. Learning a lot about things that matter 2. Working on problems that interest you 3. With people you like and respect (this is incidentally how you get co-founders at the same time as the idea) “The component of entrepreneurship that really matters is domain expertise. Larry Page is Larry Page because he was an expert on search. And he became an expert on search because he was genuinely interested in it, not because of some ulterior motive.” PG continues: “At its best, starting a startup is merely an ulterior motive for curiosity, and you’ll do it best if you introduce the ulterior motive at the end of the process. So here is the ultimate advice for young, would-be startup founders reduced to two words: Just learn.” Video source: Y Combinator (2017)

Startup Archive

51,157 次观看 • 6 个月前

I sat down with Robby Stein (Robby Stein), Google’s VP of Product for Search, at Google I/O. Robby is one of the most interesting product leaders in tech: he helped build Instagram Stories, Reels and Close Friends, and now leads core Google Search products including AI Overviews, AI Mode, Lens and ranking. We talked about one of the biggest shifts in the history of the web: Google Search becoming AI-native. Topics we covered: • AI Mode and whether it is an evolution of Search or a reinvention of it • how Google breaks complex questions into multiple searches behind the scenes • why AI search is much more expensive to run than traditional search • whether Google’s TPUs and infrastructure give it an advantage no one else can match • why Search volume is growing instead of being cannibalized by AI • the tension between great AI answers and traffic for publishers • how Google decides which sources and links to show • what a better internet could look like if AI Search works as intended The big question behind the whole conversation: If Google gives you the answer directly, what happens to the link-based web? A small caveat: sadly the microphones didnt work properly. Therefore the audio quality in this episode isn't perfect due to a recording issue - we appreciate your understanding.

I sat down with Robby Stein (Robby Stein), Google’s VP of Product for Search, at Google I/O. Robby is one of the most interesting product leaders in tech: he helped build Instagram Stories, Reels and Close Friends, and now leads core Google Search products including AI Overviews, AI Mode, Lens and ranking. We talked about one of the biggest shifts in the history of the web: Google Search becoming AI-native. Topics we covered: • AI Mode and whether it is an evolution of Search or a reinvention of it • how Google breaks complex questions into multiple searches behind the scenes • why AI search is much more expensive to run than traditional search • whether Google’s TPUs and infrastructure give it an advantage no one else can match • why Search volume is growing instead of being cannibalized by AI • the tension between great AI answers and traffic for publishers • how Google decides which sources and links to show • what a better internet could look like if AI Search works as intended The big question behind the whole conversation: If Google gives you the answer directly, what happens to the link-based web? A small caveat: sadly the microphones didnt work properly. Therefore the audio quality in this episode isn't perfect due to a recording issue - we appreciate your understanding.

Chubby♨️

30,486 次观看 • 3 个月前

"Heehee! Wanna see what my hammer can do?" Strong, spunky, and a little too unpredictable, Bacon Roll Cookie's the kind of troublemaker you can't help but keep an eye on!💗 👇 Pre-register for CookieRun: OvenSmash now! *Prefer the app store? You can pre-register here too: Google Play: App Store: One Store: #CookieRun #CookieRunOvenSmash #PreRegistration

"Heehee! Wanna see what my hammer can do?" Strong, spunky, and a little too unpredictable, Bacon Roll Cookie's the kind of troublemaker you can't help but keep an eye on!💗 👇 Pre-register for CookieRun: OvenSmash now! *Prefer the app store? You can pre-register here too: Google Play: App Store: One Store: #CookieRun #CookieRunOvenSmash #PreRegistration

CookieRun: OvenSmash

11,570 次观看 • 6 个月前

> do you understand what Claude Opus 4.8 just did to the Google job market > a senior Google engineer with 11 years of experience > stacked 32 Claude skills on top of his workflow > 8hrs → 2-3hrs per day > $95K developer vs $300K AI architect > same job. different stack. very different salary > the exact skill list is here 👇

> do you understand what Claude Opus 4.8 just did to the Google job market > a senior Google engineer with 11 years of experience > stacked 32 Claude skills on top of his workflow > 8hrs → 2-3hrs per day > $95K developer vs $300K AI architect > same job. different stack. very different salary > the exact skill list is here 👇

Mr. Buzzoni

287,675 次观看 • 3 个月前

Google Chrome now has vertical tabs, but they might not be enabled by default for you. Here’s what you need to do: - Go to the Chrome flags section, search for "vertical tabs", enable it, and relaunch the browser. - After that, right-click on the empty space next to a tab and click on "Move tabs to side".

Google Chrome now has vertical tabs, but they might not be enabled by default for you. Here’s what you need to do: - Go to the Chrome flags section, search for "vertical tabs", enable it, and relaunch the browser. - After that, right-click on the empty space next to a tab and click on "Move tabs to side".

AshutoshShrivastava

26,822 次观看 • 5 个月前

.Harvey is THE vanguard AI app startup 🆕 No Priors w/ Cofounder-CEO Winston Weinberg on: *capability improvement *co-pilots, end to end task completion, and product strategy for AI apps *selling AI to enterprise *hiring philosophy *what lawyers do in 5 years links 👇

.Harvey is THE vanguard AI app startup 🆕 No Priors w/ Cofounder-CEO Winston Weinberg on: capability improvement co-pilots, end to end task completion, and product strategy for AI apps selling AI to enterprise hiring philosophy *what lawyers do in 5 years links 👇

sarah guo

27,369 次观看 • 1 年前

The job of a marketing engineer is to pull signals into one system and turn them into pipeline. Here is an example of an SEO/AEO workflow: 1) Read Google Search Console 2) Pull the keyword data from Ahrefs or SEMrush 3) Look in the CMS to find out if the post is already there 4) Put the keywords in order by search volume and buyer intent 5) Read the pages that are at the top of the results now 6) Add the founder's point of view 7) Write the post, the meta title and the internal links Then the agent sends all of it to a person for approval. The agent can only do this if you connect it to your live business data and your tools. "The tools are going to keep changing, but the workflow is the thing to actually learn." Learn the workflow first.

The job of a marketing engineer is to pull signals into one system and turn them into pipeline. Here is an example of an SEO/AEO workflow: 1) Read Google Search Console 2) Pull the keyword data from Ahrefs or SEMrush 3) Look in the CMS to find out if the post is already there 4) Put the keywords in order by search volume and buyer intent 5) Read the pages that are at the top of the results now 6) Add the founder's point of view 7) Write the post, the meta title and the internal links Then the agent sends all of it to a person for approval. The agent can only do this if you connect it to your live business data and your tools. "The tools are going to keep changing, but the workflow is the thing to actually learn." Learn the workflow first.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

23,601 次观看 • 20 天前

Mark Zuckerberg’s advice to 19 year olds that want to have an impact Even though Zuckerberg was 19 when he started Facebook, he advises not turning your idea into a company until it’s working: “I always think the most important thing entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about and work on it, but don’t actually commit to turning it into a company until it’s working. If you look at the data of the very best companies, I think a tremendous percentage of them have been built that way and not from people who decided upfront that they wanted to start a company because you just get locked into a local maxima a lot of the time.” Sam Altman agrees. Facebook didn’t become a formal company until 6 months in when Peter Thiel invested. In fact, Mark and Dustin Moskovitz even told Peter that they were still planning on going back to school for their Fall semester. Paul Graham gives similar advice in his essay “Want to start a startup?”: “So if you want to start a startup one day, what should you do in college? There are only two things you need initially: an idea and cofounders… [and] the way to get startup ideas is not to try to think of startup ideas… if you make a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, the ideas you come up with will not merely be bad, but bad and plausible-sounding, meaning you'll waste a lot of time on them before realizing they're bad. The way to come up with good startup ideas is to take a step back. Instead of making a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, turn your mind into the type that startup ideas form in without any conscious effort. In fact, so unconsciously that you don't even realize at first that they're startup ideas. This is not only possible, it's how Apple, Yahoo, Google, and Facebook all got started. None of these companies were even meant to be companies at first. They were all just side projects. The best startups almost have to start as side projects, because great ideas tend to be such outliers that your conscious mind would reject them as ideas for companies.”

Mark Zuckerberg’s advice to 19 year olds that want to have an impact Even though Zuckerberg was 19 when he started Facebook, he advises not turning your idea into a company until it’s working: “I always think the most important thing entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about and work on it, but don’t actually commit to turning it into a company until it’s working. If you look at the data of the very best companies, I think a tremendous percentage of them have been built that way and not from people who decided upfront that they wanted to start a company because you just get locked into a local maxima a lot of the time.” Sam Altman agrees. Facebook didn’t become a formal company until 6 months in when Peter Thiel invested. In fact, Mark and Dustin Moskovitz even told Peter that they were still planning on going back to school for their Fall semester. Paul Graham gives similar advice in his essay “Want to start a startup?”: “So if you want to start a startup one day, what should you do in college? There are only two things you need initially: an idea and cofounders… [and] the way to get startup ideas is not to try to think of startup ideas… if you make a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, the ideas you come up with will not merely be bad, but bad and plausible-sounding, meaning you'll waste a lot of time on them before realizing they're bad. The way to come up with good startup ideas is to take a step back. Instead of making a conscious effort to think of startup ideas, turn your mind into the type that startup ideas form in without any conscious effort. In fact, so unconsciously that you don't even realize at first that they're startup ideas. This is not only possible, it's how Apple, Yahoo, Google, and Facebook all got started. None of these companies were even meant to be companies at first. They were all just side projects. The best startups almost have to start as side projects, because great ideas tend to be such outliers that your conscious mind would reject them as ideas for companies.”

Startup Archive

147,627 次观看 • 2 年前

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.

The All-In Podcast

95,287 次观看 • 6 个月前

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."

The All-In Podcast

58,275 次观看 • 1 年前

We're launching the Google Antigravity SDK in preview. Built for developers and researchers who want total programmatic control to customize and deploy on their own terms, it gives you the exact same agent harness optimized for Gemini, with the ultimate flexibility to run it wherever and however you want. Learn how to get started with the Antigravity SDK: 👇

We're launching the Google Antigravity SDK in preview. Built for developers and researchers who want total programmatic control to customize and deploy on their own terms, it gives you the exact same agent harness optimized for Gemini, with the ultimate flexibility to run it wherever and however you want. Learn how to get started with the Antigravity SDK: 👇

Google Antigravity

31,095 次观看 • 4 个月前

Gokul explains the only three ways ads businesses make money, and why ChatGPT may be more valuable than Google and Facebook: "One, you need to own a very coveted group of users and you need to have a surface on which those users interact. Google Search is a great example. It's a surface on which a very coveted set of users interact with and express high intent, so Google is one of the most profitable ad businesses. Facebook, very similar. It took us a while to figure out what was coveted about these users. Turns out what was coveted was the identity. ChatGPT, their combination of intent and identity data is unparalleled. I mean, Google had intent data, but not identity. Facebook identity, but not intent. These things have both. Second, you deliver an outcome at a certain cost. The best example of this is a company called AppLovin. AppLovin is a $100 plus billion company. They drive one outcome really well: mobile app installs. The third way to do it is if you are the exclusive provider for a large advertiser or a large source of demand. A good example is The Trade Desk."

Gokul explains the only three ways ads businesses make money, and why ChatGPT may be more valuable than Google and Facebook: "One, you need to own a very coveted group of users and you need to have a surface on which those users interact. Google Search is a great example. It's a surface on which a very coveted set of users interact with and express high intent, so Google is one of the most profitable ad businesses. Facebook, very similar. It took us a while to figure out what was coveted about these users. Turns out what was coveted was the identity. ChatGPT, their combination of intent and identity data is unparalleled. I mean, Google had intent data, but not identity. Facebook identity, but not intent. These things have both. Second, you deliver an outcome at a certain cost. The best example of this is a company called AppLovin. AppLovin is a $100 plus billion company. They drive one outcome really well: mobile app installs. The third way to do it is if you are the exclusive provider for a large advertiser or a large source of demand. A good example is The Trade Desk."

Patrick OShaughnessy

47,449 次观看 • 7 个月前