Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

What does a rifle using subsonic ammo sound like? What type of muzzle flash can you expect? Is it so quiet you can't hear it? Here's a video I shot over a year ago when people were saying there was "muzzle flash" from the AGR building in Butler. Spoiler...

paramounttactcl's profile picture

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

8,353 subscribers

97,360 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.
0:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,665,164 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Nick Sortor Here it is in slow motion I'm not seeing a muzzle flash either. Wish we had all 17 seconds of the video here. If muzzle flash before this, then fuse, Deadman switch, and timer are on the table.
0:27

Nick Sortor Here it is in slow motion I'm not seeing a muzzle flash either. Wish we had all 17 seconds of the video here. If muzzle flash before this, then fuse, Deadman switch, and timer are on the table.

Brick Suit

416,042 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎
0:31

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎

Project Constitution

296,671 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

New Details on the Cybertruck explosion and the video i was analyzing WAS Modified in a very specific way. Did CNN delete the muzzle flash? Why is the video from CNN so different than the video shown today by the Sheriff? Why is everything so weird with this case??
6:15

New Details on the Cybertruck explosion and the video i was analyzing WAS Modified in a very specific way. Did CNN delete the muzzle flash? Why is the video from CNN so different than the video shown today by the Sheriff? Why is everything so weird with this case??

ProPixel Video Analysis and Research

14,880 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.
8:41

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.

MJTruthUltra

237,534 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Kenji, the baby Mooseweiler, is learning to be comfortable with a muzzle. He isn't aggressive or likely to bite someone, so why do we do this? Emergency preparedness. If he's ever seriously injured the vet clinic will likely muzzle him as soon as they take him into the back. Even the gentlest of dogs with the best temperaments might become fearful and bite if they are in pain and someone tries to exam their injury. Especially if it's a stranger or they already have negative feelings about vet clinics. Even something as straightforward as a torn nail can be painful enough that a muzzle is used. Putting the muzzle on allows the veterinary team to quickly and safely examine the dog, perform first aid, or start an IV for sedation if needed. If a dog has never worn a muzzle, it can add to the stress and fear they are already experiencing from being restrained and examined while being in pain, especially if they try to resist having it put on. It's much easier on the dog and the veterinary team if the dog is comfortable with wearing a muzzle. If the dog has had a lot of positive conditioning with the muzzle it can actually help calm them as it's something familiar with good emotions attached. Anytime I can help my dogs avoid unnecessary stress, I'll do it. Muzzle training is one way and it helps ensure we're prepared for emergencies. Often when someone sees a dog wearing a muzzle, they assume the dog is aggressive. That's often not the case. It could simply be wearing it during training to get comfortable with it or it might be a dog that eats things off the ground. It could also be a responsible owner of a fearful dog that might snap if an unleashed dog rudely runs up. A muzzle doesn't mean a dog is bad. It's often the sign of a good dog owner. #XDogs #PuppyTraining #Muzzles 🎥 Kenji learning to voluntarily put his head into a muzzle
0:26

Kenji, the baby Mooseweiler, is learning to be comfortable with a muzzle. He isn't aggressive or likely to bite someone, so why do we do this? Emergency preparedness. If he's ever seriously injured the vet clinic will likely muzzle him as soon as they take him into the back. Even the gentlest of dogs with the best temperaments might become fearful and bite if they are in pain and someone tries to exam their injury. Especially if it's a stranger or they already have negative feelings about vet clinics. Even something as straightforward as a torn nail can be painful enough that a muzzle is used. Putting the muzzle on allows the veterinary team to quickly and safely examine the dog, perform first aid, or start an IV for sedation if needed. If a dog has never worn a muzzle, it can add to the stress and fear they are already experiencing from being restrained and examined while being in pain, especially if they try to resist having it put on. It's much easier on the dog and the veterinary team if the dog is comfortable with wearing a muzzle. If the dog has had a lot of positive conditioning with the muzzle it can actually help calm them as it's something familiar with good emotions attached. Anytime I can help my dogs avoid unnecessary stress, I'll do it. Muzzle training is one way and it helps ensure we're prepared for emergencies. Often when someone sees a dog wearing a muzzle, they assume the dog is aggressive. That's often not the case. It could simply be wearing it during training to get comfortable with it or it might be a dog that eats things off the ground. It could also be a responsible owner of a fearful dog that might snap if an unleashed dog rudely runs up. A muzzle doesn't mean a dog is bad. It's often the sign of a good dog owner. #XDogs #PuppyTraining #Muzzles 🎥 Kenji learning to voluntarily put his head into a muzzle

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

13,457 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.
0:52

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.

The SCIF

108,760 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I quickly examined Damage Prediction Note this is based on a very small sample size from a casual server, results might be different for you, so I suggest doing your own testing When turned on, results for me show how the headshot effect/spark aligns with the muzzle flash now
1:02

I quickly examined Damage Prediction Note this is based on a very small sample size from a casual server, results might be different for you, so I suggest doing your own testing When turned on, results for me show how the headshot effect/spark aligns with the muzzle flash now

Maxim

118,957 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I keep hearing the same story from Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, and Jack Posobiec about the "bombshell" video shown on the final day of the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. So I pulled the video apart frame by frame. My conclusion: the public narrative about what this video supposedly shows doesn't match what I see. ❌ It's not a magically enhanced 4K video. ❌ You cannot clearly see a rifle. ❌ You do not see a shot fired. ❌ You do not see a muzzle flash. ❌ You do not see recoil. ❌ There is no audio. What you do see is a zoomed-in version of an already low-quality surveillance video. The individual climbs the railing, runs, lies down for a period of time, and then runs away at approximately 12:23:30. That's it. Watch the video yourself and decide whether the claims being made about this footage are supported by what is actually on the screen. Receipts matter. Video attached.
7:39

I keep hearing the same story from Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, and Jack Posobiec about the "bombshell" video shown on the final day of the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. So I pulled the video apart frame by frame. My conclusion: the public narrative about what this video supposedly shows doesn't match what I see. ❌ It's not a magically enhanced 4K video. ❌ You cannot clearly see a rifle. ❌ You do not see a shot fired. ❌ You do not see a muzzle flash. ❌ You do not see recoil. ❌ There is no audio. What you do see is a zoomed-in version of an already low-quality surveillance video. The individual climbs the railing, runs, lies down for a period of time, and then runs away at approximately 12:23:30. That's it. Watch the video yourself and decide whether the claims being made about this footage are supported by what is actually on the screen. Receipts matter. Video attached.

The Black Line Brief

20,185 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution
0:51

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution

The SCIF

32,169 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"You go in and you want to kill another human being. I just had a craving — I wanted to legally k*ll somebody that was a bad guy. All of a sudden, I’m walking and I step on something big. I draw down, start mule kicking, and realize it’s a dude. Then I see muzzle flash right in front of us, call contact front, and engage. Seconds later, I hear ‘cease fire’ and ‘man down,’ and immediately I had the sensation that I was the guy who had shot them." David Rutherford
6:21

Sensitive content

"You go in and you want to kill another human being. I just had a craving — I wanted to legally k*ll somebody that was a bad guy. All of a sudden, I’m walking and I step on something big. I draw down, start mule kicking, and realize it’s a dude. Then I see muzzle flash right in front of us, call contact front, and engage. Seconds later, I hear ‘cease fire’ and ‘man down,’ and immediately I had the sensation that I was the guy who had shot them." David Rutherford

Shawn Ryan Show

77,645 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then that puts the kill shot being fired from the roof of the Sorensen Center. Such a trajectory better matches the analysis of Charlie Kirk's wound arrived at independently by both Chris Martenson & Baron Coleman (YouTube, H/T: Baron's eagle eyes). At the end of the video, I've included a rough layout analysis of the locations & trajectories. In the next tweet below, I'll link the source video.
2:14

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then that puts the kill shot being fired from the roof of the Sorensen Center. Such a trajectory better matches the analysis of Charlie Kirk's wound arrived at independently by both Chris Martenson & Baron Coleman (YouTube, H/T: Baron's eagle eyes). At the end of the video, I've included a rough layout analysis of the locations & trajectories. In the next tweet below, I'll link the source video.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

213,940 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

“I look up and I see muzzle flash right in front of us. … I go in, I get out a grenade and I prep a grenade… ‘Should I throw it?’ … ‘No.’ … ‘Cease fire, cease fire.’ … Immediately that’s when you heard ‘man down.’ … ‘Holy f*, he's going to die. Josh is going to die.’ … My round hit Larry’s shin, hit Tommy’s leg, and hit Marty in the mag well..." David Rutherford
21:25

“I look up and I see muzzle flash right in front of us. … I go in, I get out a grenade and I prep a grenade… ‘Should I throw it?’ … ‘No.’ … ‘Cease fire, cease fire.’ … Immediately that’s when you heard ‘man down.’ … ‘Holy f*, he's going to die. Josh is going to die.’ … My round hit Larry’s shin, hit Tommy’s leg, and hit Marty in the mag well..." David Rutherford

Shawn Ryan

69,507 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

BREAKING - New rifle fire signature (sound + visual rifle flash) recorded and posted by Eminent Bro-main 👁 (on X), appearing to show suppressed (sniper) rifle fire from a first floor window underneath the Crooks roof, fired TOWARD the Trump podium. Approximate time is 9.15 seconds after round #1. See this slo-mo version video for yourself. Unless this is somehow faked, it would indicate someone in the first floor fired out the window and was not in any way attempting to hit Crooks, because Crooks was overhead (on the roof). This video is UNEDITED (on my part) except for slowing it down, looping and cropping at the very end to zoom in on the window. Note that suppressed rifle fire can very much produce a visual signature of flash, even if the sound signature is significantly reduced. User RealDJstew724 says he was detained by LEOs and they originally confiscated his phone but he got it back. Says he will post raw video soon. Stay tuned...
0:28

BREAKING - New rifle fire signature (sound + visual rifle flash) recorded and posted by Eminent Bro-main 👁 (on X), appearing to show suppressed (sniper) rifle fire from a first floor window underneath the Crooks roof, fired TOWARD the Trump podium. Approximate time is 9.15 seconds after round #1. See this slo-mo version video for yourself. Unless this is somehow faked, it would indicate someone in the first floor fired out the window and was not in any way attempting to hit Crooks, because Crooks was overhead (on the roof). This video is UNEDITED (on my part) except for slowing it down, looping and cropping at the very end to zoom in on the window. Note that suppressed rifle fire can very much produce a visual signature of flash, even if the sound signature is significantly reduced. User RealDJstew724 says he was detained by LEOs and they originally confiscated his phone but he got it back. Says he will post raw video soon. Stay tuned...

HealthRanger

857,536 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇺🇸 FIRST SHOT: It’s tough to see, but I think I found the muzzle flash from the first shot. This makes or breaks the situation. It’s important to know where the first shot came from. It looks like the shot came from the direction of the suspect, upwards. Theories: 1) An agent fumbles his gun and it falls there, hence they all scream “GUN!” They mean a second gun. The shot is unaided, just random. 2) An agent shot upwards? Seems unlikely. Why would others scream “gun” and run after seeing an agent with a gun? 3) The guy took away the gun? But he was on his elbows literally a second before the shot was fired.
0:27

🇺🇸 FIRST SHOT: It’s tough to see, but I think I found the muzzle flash from the first shot. This makes or breaks the situation. It’s important to know where the first shot came from. It looks like the shot came from the direction of the suspect, upwards. Theories: 1) An agent fumbles his gun and it falls there, hence they all scream “GUN!” They mean a second gun. The shot is unaided, just random. 2) An agent shot upwards? Seems unlikely. Why would others scream “gun” and run after seeing an agent with a gun? 3) The guy took away the gun? But he was on his elbows literally a second before the shot was fired.

Lord Bebo

36,134 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

" 'Mine' is about the idea of what a relationship could look like if I really found a real one. This guy put his arm around me and it was by the water and I literally saw the entire relationship flash forward in that moment. It was pretty weird. So i wrote what it looked like."
0:22

" 'Mine' is about the idea of what a relationship could look like if I really found a real one. This guy put his arm around me and it was by the water and I literally saw the entire relationship flash forward in that moment. It was pretty weird. So i wrote what it looked like."

taylor

107,338 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

UPDATE: Allen Cole HD footage, finally… towards the end of the video, you can see what appears to be two magazines sliding across the floor, I suspect from law enforcement as they unloaded fire and reloaded. QUESTION… It was reported that Cole Allen was not shot at all.. not once. Not even by the first officer who drew their weapon at point blank range… there are no reports he was wearing any kind of vest. Lot of bullets. None landed… so what stopped him? They say he fell down after hitting his knee. Also, no muzzle flash from his shotgun? Also, for reference, a map of the building showing where the security perimeter was. — he was on the Terrance level floor, the floor above the ballroom. — he was stopped roughly 60ft past the security perimeter, right before the stairs that lead to the lower level Ballroom area where President Trump was. It was over very quickly.
0:45

UPDATE: Allen Cole HD footage, finally… towards the end of the video, you can see what appears to be two magazines sliding across the floor, I suspect from law enforcement as they unloaded fire and reloaded. QUESTION… It was reported that Cole Allen was not shot at all.. not once. Not even by the first officer who drew their weapon at point blank range… there are no reports he was wearing any kind of vest. Lot of bullets. None landed… so what stopped him? They say he fell down after hitting his knee. Also, no muzzle flash from his shotgun? Also, for reference, a map of the building showing where the security perimeter was. — he was on the Terrance level floor, the floor above the ballroom. — he was stopped roughly 60ft past the security perimeter, right before the stairs that lead to the lower level Ballroom area where President Trump was. It was over very quickly.

MJTruthUltra

124,977 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Great to see Julius Malema back in court. Unfortunately not behind bars... yet. Here are the 8 reasons why I believe the object Julius Malema discharged was a real firearm, also see the video below. Muzzle flash: Muzzle flash is clear on the video of Julius Malema discharging a firearm that was made public. Muzzle flash can only occur when a detonator ignites gunpowder in the cartridge to then discharge the projectile with high pressure. Recoil: The video clearly shows that the firearm causes recoil with every shot that was fired. It is clear that Julius Malema must hold on with both hands to compensate recoil. If it was a toy gun/another object that didn’t discharge real ammo, it would not have caused recoil. Handling of the firearm: The firearm Julius Malema used to discharge the shots was handled with extreme caution during the presentation and recovery thereof by Adriaan Snyman, Malema’s Head of Security during the event. He would not have handled a toy gun in this manner. Gunshot sound: The sound and buzzing of the shots that are clearly audible in the video byte disprove many of Julius Malema’s excuses that it wasn’t a real firearm or ammunition that was discharged, according to several experts that were consulted. Accounts: Julius Malema and the EFF have continuously adjusted their accounts since the incident. It was initially alleged that blanks were used. Experts that were consulted describe this as unlikely seeing as the necessary accessories to discharge the firearm in this manner were lacking and the firearm didn’t react in the way it would have had the firearm discharged these blanks. The EFF later stated that it wasn’t a real firearm, but a toy gun that was used in synchronisation with fireworks to create the realistic effect. The experts also reject this account due to the reasons mentioned above. Julius Malema’s Head of Security handled and presented the firearm: Snyman that presented the firearm to Malema and also collected it again. Snyman’s security company is well known for owning similar firearms. Snyman has also in the past made himself guilty of the inappropriate carrying of these types of weapons during one of Malema’s court appearances. This incident caused a major uproar and it demonstrates Snyman’s apparent careless attitude with regard to these weapons.
0:20

Great to see Julius Malema back in court. Unfortunately not behind bars... yet. Here are the 8 reasons why I believe the object Julius Malema discharged was a real firearm, also see the video below. Muzzle flash: Muzzle flash is clear on the video of Julius Malema discharging a firearm that was made public. Muzzle flash can only occur when a detonator ignites gunpowder in the cartridge to then discharge the projectile with high pressure. Recoil: The video clearly shows that the firearm causes recoil with every shot that was fired. It is clear that Julius Malema must hold on with both hands to compensate recoil. If it was a toy gun/another object that didn’t discharge real ammo, it would not have caused recoil. Handling of the firearm: The firearm Julius Malema used to discharge the shots was handled with extreme caution during the presentation and recovery thereof by Adriaan Snyman, Malema’s Head of Security during the event. He would not have handled a toy gun in this manner. Gunshot sound: The sound and buzzing of the shots that are clearly audible in the video byte disprove many of Julius Malema’s excuses that it wasn’t a real firearm or ammunition that was discharged, according to several experts that were consulted. Accounts: Julius Malema and the EFF have continuously adjusted their accounts since the incident. It was initially alleged that blanks were used. Experts that were consulted describe this as unlikely seeing as the necessary accessories to discharge the firearm in this manner were lacking and the firearm didn’t react in the way it would have had the firearm discharged these blanks. The EFF later stated that it wasn’t a real firearm, but a toy gun that was used in synchronisation with fireworks to create the realistic effect. The experts also reject this account due to the reasons mentioned above. Julius Malema’s Head of Security handled and presented the firearm: Snyman that presented the firearm to Malema and also collected it again. Snyman’s security company is well known for owning similar firearms. Snyman has also in the past made himself guilty of the inappropriate carrying of these types of weapons during one of Malema’s court appearances. This incident caused a major uproar and it demonstrates Snyman’s apparent careless attitude with regard to these weapons.

Ian Cameron

319,601 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

TARZZAN said he was afraid of ANNIE's gaze Like when they sat down, sing and dance, it was as if there was a flash of light from Annie's gaze that signaled them to be quiet. So the male members would think, "This not the right time (to joke around)."
0:20

TARZZAN said he was afraid of ANNIE's gaze Like when they sat down, sing and dance, it was as if there was a flash of light from Annie's gaze that signaled them to be quiet. So the male members would think, "This not the right time (to joke around)."

adp pics

234,557 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Brian Harpole appears quite confident that no flash will be captured on camera, thereby refuting the exploding mic theory. I learned something important. 💥 The immediate flash from a small amount of PETN lasts between 1 to 5 microseconds. - Flash Duration: Lasts 1-5 microseconds (millionths of a second). - Standard Camera Shutter: Stays open for at least 250 microseconds (at 1/4000s speed), making it 250 times too slow to capture the flash without washing out or blurring. - Human Eye Processing: Takes 100,000 microseconds (0.1 seconds) to reset. The Human Illusion: Persistence of Vision Your eye doesn’t actually see the flash in real-time. Instead, the blinding light overloads your retina. Your brain stretches that tiny microsecond burst into a 0.1-second afterimage. Essentially, you’re seeing the “ghost” of the flash left behind in your own eye. In other words, the only reason the human eye “sees” the flash from an explosion like that is because our brains create an optical illusion. We do not and would not ever see the flash from a small amount of PETN on camera, even if you can see it with the naked human eye, without the use of highly specialized equipment. Brian's argument here is very deceptive.
0:34

Brian Harpole appears quite confident that no flash will be captured on camera, thereby refuting the exploding mic theory. I learned something important. 💥 The immediate flash from a small amount of PETN lasts between 1 to 5 microseconds. - Flash Duration: Lasts 1-5 microseconds (millionths of a second). - Standard Camera Shutter: Stays open for at least 250 microseconds (at 1/4000s speed), making it 250 times too slow to capture the flash without washing out or blurring. - Human Eye Processing: Takes 100,000 microseconds (0.1 seconds) to reset. The Human Illusion: Persistence of Vision Your eye doesn’t actually see the flash in real-time. Instead, the blinding light overloads your retina. Your brain stretches that tiny microsecond burst into a 0.1-second afterimage. Essentially, you’re seeing the “ghost” of the flash left behind in your own eye. In other words, the only reason the human eye “sees” the flash from an explosion like that is because our brains create an optical illusion. We do not and would not ever see the flash from a small amount of PETN on camera, even if you can see it with the naked human eye, without the use of highly specialized equipment. Brian's argument here is very deceptive.

Travis

72,221 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen