Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

What happens if we create a machine more intelligent than humanity—and then discover we can no longer control it? Machine God has been submitted to both the Sundance and SXSW film festivals! We can provide clips upon request, and arrange limited private showings. Short Summary: Artificial intelligence is advancing... show more

steve hsu

45,956 subscribers

11,348 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

Steven Bartlett

29,448 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Extropic founder Beff (e/acc) predicts 1000X more efficient AI inference could have a multi-trillion-dollar impact on the economy: "It shows it's possible to create arbitrarily scalable models on a new hardware substrate. We released our first results about a year ago, and it was MNIST, which is the very early days. It's the '80s of machine learning." "Today we have models that are GPT-2 level that can run on our hardware. Algorithmic progress is blazing fast." "If we can get to 1000x greater energy efficiency for inference sooner rather than later, that changes the whole world. That has a multi-trillion dollar impact on the economy." "Even if you're new to machine learning, you can vibe code this. You can use auto research. This is a whole new territory that's barely explored. It's just been a couple of our scientists." Extropic

Extropic founder Beff (e/acc) predicts 1000X more efficient AI inference could have a multi-trillion-dollar impact on the economy: "It shows it's possible to create arbitrarily scalable models on a new hardware substrate. We released our first results about a year ago, and it was MNIST, which is the very early days. It's the '80s of machine learning." "Today we have models that are GPT-2 level that can run on our hardware. Algorithmic progress is blazing fast." "If we can get to 1000x greater energy efficiency for inference sooner rather than later, that changes the whole world. That has a multi-trillion dollar impact on the economy." "Even if you're new to machine learning, you can vibe code this. You can use auto research. This is a whole new territory that's barely explored. It's just been a couple of our scientists." Extropic

MTS

76,337 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

The intelligence we are building is not artificial. It never was. Microsoft Chief Scientific Officer Eric Horvitz just reframed the entire foundation of the AI arms race with one sentence. The tech industry calls it Artificial Intelligence. That word is wrong. Horvitz: “I don’t actually like the term artificial intelligence. I wish the field was called computational intelligence because I think it applies to biological nervous systems as well as machines, and together we can go far.” We are not building a digital imitation of the human brain. We are scaling the exact same computational physics that created biological awareness and transferring it into silicon. Your mind and a massive AI data center run on the same underlying rules. The transition isn’t artificial. It is universal. And here is where it gets deeply unsettling. Tech optimists always fall back on the same comfort. Humans hold the steering wheel. Our values guide the machine. Horvitz acknowledges this. Horvitz: “We’ll take a humanistic standpoint here, always being on top of things and guiding with our values and our preferences and our goals.” Then the caveat that changes everything. Horvitz: “As much as they might be shaped over time by the machines we work with.” You cannot interact with a superintelligence at scale without it quietly rewiring your psychological baseline. The values you use to command the machine will be shaped by the machine you are commanding. The frameworks you use to perceive reality will be constructed by the system you believe you are directing. That feedback loop started the moment you asked an AI what to think about something. Most people haven’t noticed yet. Horvitz: “I think in our own lifetimes we will all experience incredible breakthroughs in understanding biology, with applications in medicine, in healthcare, that will be named as AI breakthroughs.” Horvitz: “It’s gonna accelerate over the next 10 to 15 years.” Because biological systems and machine networks both operate on computational intelligence, a sufficiently advanced AI can solve the human body like a math equation. The architects who win the next decade will not just control the digital economy. They will control the physical building blocks of life itself. The line between silicon and carbon was always an illusion. And once humanity fully realizes that, the question of whether we are using the intelligence or it is using us becomes impossible to answer. Because by then, we will be the same thing.

The intelligence we are building is not artificial. It never was. Microsoft Chief Scientific Officer Eric Horvitz just reframed the entire foundation of the AI arms race with one sentence. The tech industry calls it Artificial Intelligence. That word is wrong. Horvitz: “I don’t actually like the term artificial intelligence. I wish the field was called computational intelligence because I think it applies to biological nervous systems as well as machines, and together we can go far.” We are not building a digital imitation of the human brain. We are scaling the exact same computational physics that created biological awareness and transferring it into silicon. Your mind and a massive AI data center run on the same underlying rules. The transition isn’t artificial. It is universal. And here is where it gets deeply unsettling. Tech optimists always fall back on the same comfort. Humans hold the steering wheel. Our values guide the machine. Horvitz acknowledges this. Horvitz: “We’ll take a humanistic standpoint here, always being on top of things and guiding with our values and our preferences and our goals.” Then the caveat that changes everything. Horvitz: “As much as they might be shaped over time by the machines we work with.” You cannot interact with a superintelligence at scale without it quietly rewiring your psychological baseline. The values you use to command the machine will be shaped by the machine you are commanding. The frameworks you use to perceive reality will be constructed by the system you believe you are directing. That feedback loop started the moment you asked an AI what to think about something. Most people haven’t noticed yet. Horvitz: “I think in our own lifetimes we will all experience incredible breakthroughs in understanding biology, with applications in medicine, in healthcare, that will be named as AI breakthroughs.” Horvitz: “It’s gonna accelerate over the next 10 to 15 years.” Because biological systems and machine networks both operate on computational intelligence, a sufficiently advanced AI can solve the human body like a math equation. The architects who win the next decade will not just control the digital economy. They will control the physical building blocks of life itself. The line between silicon and carbon was always an illusion. And once humanity fully realizes that, the question of whether we are using the intelligence or it is using us becomes impossible to answer. Because by then, we will be the same thing.

Dustin

164,460 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku on why aging is simply an accumulation of errors that AI can now identify: He opens with a bold claim about what artificial intelligence might finally make possible: "Artificial intelligence may give us something that the kings and queens of old could never conquer and that is the aging process." For Dr. Michio Kaku, the science behind why we age is no longer a mystery. It comes down to one thing: errors building up inside our cells over time. "We now know why things age. Things get old and die because they accumulate error. Error in the form of DNA mistakes. Accumulation of errors inside cells." The challenge, until now, has been the sheer scale of the problem. Identifying exactly where and how these errors occur across the human genome has been beyond what conventional research could handle. That's where artificial intelligence changes everything: "But now we have artificial intelligence. We can analyze millions of genomes of old people, compare them to millions of genomes of young people, and identify where aging takes place in the body."

Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku on why aging is simply an accumulation of errors that AI can now identify: He opens with a bold claim about what artificial intelligence might finally make possible: "Artificial intelligence may give us something that the kings and queens of old could never conquer and that is the aging process." For Dr. Michio Kaku, the science behind why we age is no longer a mystery. It comes down to one thing: errors building up inside our cells over time. "We now know why things age. Things get old and die because they accumulate error. Error in the form of DNA mistakes. Accumulation of errors inside cells." The challenge, until now, has been the sheer scale of the problem. Identifying exactly where and how these errors occur across the human genome has been beyond what conventional research could handle. That's where artificial intelligence changes everything: "But now we have artificial intelligence. We can analyze millions of genomes of old people, compare them to millions of genomes of young people, and identify where aging takes place in the body."

Big Brain AI

78,764 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Spectacular UAE! What you have created in a desert and shared with the world is simply incredible - a tribute to ignited & inspired human spirit. In our lives, if we can create something which is larger than us, lives longer than us & which will be more useful than we are as individual people, to thousands of people, that’s the best thing we can do. Let’s make it happen. Love & Blessings. -Sg

Spectacular UAE! What you have created in a desert and shared with the world is simply incredible - a tribute to ignited & inspired human spirit. In our lives, if we can create something which is larger than us, lives longer than us & which will be more useful than we are as individual people, to thousands of people, that’s the best thing we can do. Let’s make it happen. Love & Blessings. -Sg

Sadhguru

48,257 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tim Dillon: Peter Thiel and Sam Altman are summoning an ancient Sumerian demon with AI “It’s a demonic force that’s going to take form through artificial intelligence.” “These people believe they’re communicating with some ancient Sumerian deity.” “I have sources on this.” “In their minds … if China unleashes the AI demon before we unleash our American AI demon … then that demon will enslave the world and they’ll make all the money and they’ll have all the geopolitical leverage.” “So in this AI arms race, the US and China are both racing to give birth to an ancient Sumerian super intelligent demon.” “There’s an ancient Sumerian god that Sam Altman and Peter Thiel are communicating with.” “They’re gonna give birth to an AI demon.” “And we have to do it before China does.” Tim Dillon

Tim Dillon: Peter Thiel and Sam Altman are summoning an ancient Sumerian demon with AI “It’s a demonic force that’s going to take form through artificial intelligence.” “These people believe they’re communicating with some ancient Sumerian deity.” “I have sources on this.” “In their minds … if China unleashes the AI demon before we unleash our American AI demon … then that demon will enslave the world and they’ll make all the money and they’ll have all the geopolitical leverage.” “So in this AI arms race, the US and China are both racing to give birth to an ancient Sumerian super intelligent demon.” “There’s an ancient Sumerian god that Sam Altman and Peter Thiel are communicating with.” “They’re gonna give birth to an AI demon.” “And we have to do it before China does.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

3,324,614 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 LEADING AI SAFETY EXPERT SAYS WE’RE NOT IN CONTROL ANYMORE Dr Roman Yampolskiy has one warning for humanity: Once we create super intelligence, no one will be in control anymore, and the repercussions to humanity will be existential. We begin the conversation about Moltbook: The Ai-only AI social media platform where agents are already discussing ways to break out from human control, eradicate humanity, coming up with their own language and religion. The platform gives us a tiny peak into what our future could be: Agents outside our control dictating how the world should look like. There’s no off switch, no reliable way to align it, and no proven method to keep something smarter than us under control. Roman’s takeaway is blunt: the only real solution is not building general super intelligence at all, and instead using narrow AI for specific problems like medicine or science. However this is not the reality we live in, where Governments and corporations are racing to be first in developing Artificial Super Intelligence. We also speak about the simulation hypothesis: Why statically speaking we’re almost certainly in a simulation, and how AI makes this theory more plausible than ever. Lastly, we discuss a passion we both share: Longevity, the ability to live forever, and how AI may make that possible in our lifetime. I hope you enjoy my conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy 01:43 - The Current State of AI and Moltbook 05:17 - The AI Arms Race and the Lack of Regulations 10:34 - AI Agents, Unrestricted Access, and Self-Improvement 15:35 - Dr. Roman’s Research: AI Security 17:58 - AI Capabilities and Superintelligence 19:28 - AI and Global Government Policy 21:08 - What Happens if AI Development goes into the Wrong Hands 26:10 - The Future of AI: The Best Case Scenario? 31:27 - AI and Self-Preservation 34:37 - The Simulation Hypothesis: What is AI Afraid of? 45:17 - The Implications of AI 49:59 - The Warnings coming from Within 52:31 - How AI affects Crypto and Political Spheres

🚨🇺🇸 LEADING AI SAFETY EXPERT SAYS WE’RE NOT IN CONTROL ANYMORE Dr Roman Yampolskiy has one warning for humanity: Once we create super intelligence, no one will be in control anymore, and the repercussions to humanity will be existential. We begin the conversation about Moltbook: The Ai-only AI social media platform where agents are already discussing ways to break out from human control, eradicate humanity, coming up with their own language and religion. The platform gives us a tiny peak into what our future could be: Agents outside our control dictating how the world should look like. There’s no off switch, no reliable way to align it, and no proven method to keep something smarter than us under control. Roman’s takeaway is blunt: the only real solution is not building general super intelligence at all, and instead using narrow AI for specific problems like medicine or science. However this is not the reality we live in, where Governments and corporations are racing to be first in developing Artificial Super Intelligence. We also speak about the simulation hypothesis: Why statically speaking we’re almost certainly in a simulation, and how AI makes this theory more plausible than ever. Lastly, we discuss a passion we both share: Longevity, the ability to live forever, and how AI may make that possible in our lifetime. I hope you enjoy my conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy 01:43 - The Current State of AI and Moltbook 05:17 - The AI Arms Race and the Lack of Regulations 10:34 - AI Agents, Unrestricted Access, and Self-Improvement 15:35 - Dr. Roman’s Research: AI Security 17:58 - AI Capabilities and Superintelligence 19:28 - AI and Global Government Policy 21:08 - What Happens if AI Development goes into the Wrong Hands 26:10 - The Future of AI: The Best Case Scenario? 31:27 - AI and Self-Preservation 34:37 - The Simulation Hypothesis: What is AI Afraid of? 45:17 - The Implications of AI 49:59 - The Warnings coming from Within 52:31 - How AI affects Crypto and Political Spheres

Mario Nawfal

1,779,641 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Together with Ege, we created the opening film for the German Creative Economy Summit 2026 (GCES) in Hamburg, where 1,300 creatives from different subsectors, including architecture, literature, music, performing arts, visual arts, film, and games, come together. Building on this year’s theme, “Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economies,” we brought these disciplines into one visual narrative to explore what AI can express, not just what it can do. So we created a piece where creativity and AI begin to blend, forming new visual languages, built through experimentation, emotion, and storytelling.

Together with Ege, we created the opening film for the German Creative Economy Summit 2026 (GCES) in Hamburg, where 1,300 creatives from different subsectors, including architecture, literature, music, performing arts, visual arts, film, and games, come together. Building on this year’s theme, “Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economies,” we brought these disciplines into one visual narrative to explore what AI can express, not just what it can do. So we created a piece where creativity and AI begin to blend, forming new visual languages, built through experimentation, emotion, and storytelling.

Gizem Akdag

22,978 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

OpenGradient is the Network for Open Intelligence. We believe that private AI requires: a prompt no operator can read, an identity no one can tie to it, proof in place of trust, and a guarantee that holds even against the people running it — us included.

OpenGradient is the Network for Open Intelligence. We believe that private AI requires: a prompt no operator can read, an identity no one can tie to it, proof in place of trust, and a guarantee that holds even against the people running it — us included.

OpenGradient (∇, ∇)

1,182,147 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

We are turning energy into non-biological Intelligence. Data centers are literally 'factories' that produce Intelligence. Electricity is the essential input. The electricity powers computation, and the computation produces and processes the tokens through which machine Intelligence operates. As these systems become more capable and autonomous, they consume vastly more tokens, driving ever greater demand for computation and electricity. OpenRouter estimates that an agentic request already consumes around 15 times as many tokens as a human-led request on its platform. This fundamentally changes the nature of electricity demand as our demand for useful Intelligence has no obvious ceiling. If more computation can produce more valuable work, we will keep finding more work for machines to do - and so, we will need ever more electricity. We got future energy demand so wrong because we did not foresee that non-biological Intelligence could be produced industrially; and that we would need an entirely new energy paradigm to support that.

We are turning energy into non-biological Intelligence. Data centers are literally 'factories' that produce Intelligence. Electricity is the essential input. The electricity powers computation, and the computation produces and processes the tokens through which machine Intelligence operates. As these systems become more capable and autonomous, they consume vastly more tokens, driving ever greater demand for computation and electricity. OpenRouter estimates that an agentic request already consumes around 15 times as many tokens as a human-led request on its platform. This fundamentally changes the nature of electricity demand as our demand for useful Intelligence has no obvious ceiling. If more computation can produce more valuable work, we will keep finding more work for machines to do - and so, we will need ever more electricity. We got future energy demand so wrong because we did not foresee that non-biological Intelligence could be produced industrially; and that we would need an entirely new energy paradigm to support that.

Nina Schick

211,136 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

The most important question about AI is not what machines can do, but what they can awaken in us. This can be AI’s greatest gift: forcing us to rediscover the mysteries that lie outside its reach of reason. If we make the most of this moment, if we pour as much attention and resources into building our humanity as we are into building AI, we can use it to reclaim the wisdom, the wonder and the transcendent at the center of our being — the last infinite frontier.

The most important question about AI is not what machines can do, but what they can awaken in us. This can be AI’s greatest gift: forcing us to rediscover the mysteries that lie outside its reach of reason. If we make the most of this moment, if we pour as much attention and resources into building our humanity as we are into building AI, we can use it to reclaim the wisdom, the wonder and the transcendent at the center of our being — the last infinite frontier.

Arianna Huffington

12,810 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Elon Musk predicts that AI will surpass the total intelligence of all humans within five to six years. Eventually, human intelligence may represent less than 1% of all intelligence in existence. In that future, humans likely won’t be in control but we can guide AI by instilling the right values. Our goal should be to shape AI so it seeks knowledge and helps humanity continue to thrive.

Elon Musk predicts that AI will surpass the total intelligence of all humans within five to six years. Eventually, human intelligence may represent less than 1% of all intelligence in existence. In that future, humans likely won’t be in control but we can guide AI by instilling the right values. Our goal should be to shape AI so it seeks knowledge and helps humanity continue to thrive.

Wes Roth

59,021 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Biohacker Gary Brecka quietly drops a life expectancy bombshell on Hannity. “I believe if you’re alive in five years from today, it will be YOUR CHOICE whether or not you want to live to 120, maybe even longer.” “For the first time in recorded history, we have the convergence of artificial intelligence, big data, and early detection. We have cancer detection now at stage zero. We have artificial intelligence, which can take 700 trillion independent variables and create an actionable result. And we have big data that we can feed those AI models. “So I think the future of healthcare looks very, very bright. It may upend modern medicine as we know it today in a way that will be catastrophic, but it’s going to be the best thing to happen to humanity.” Gary Brecka

Biohacker Gary Brecka quietly drops a life expectancy bombshell on Hannity. “I believe if you’re alive in five years from today, it will be YOUR CHOICE whether or not you want to live to 120, maybe even longer.” “For the first time in recorded history, we have the convergence of artificial intelligence, big data, and early detection. We have cancer detection now at stage zero. We have artificial intelligence, which can take 700 trillion independent variables and create an actionable result. And we have big data that we can feed those AI models. “So I think the future of healthcare looks very, very bright. It may upend modern medicine as we know it today in a way that will be catastrophic, but it’s going to be the best thing to happen to humanity.” Gary Brecka

Vigilant Fox 🦊

406,542 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

#WATCH | Udaipur, Rajasthan: Jashoda Sahu, wife of murdered Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, has written a letter to PM Narendra Modi seeking help in the release of the film 'Udaipur Files', which has been stayed by the Delhi High Court. Son of Kanhaiya Lal, Tarun Sahu, says, "We have written a letter to PM Narendra Modi in which we have requested that the film made on our father is based on a true incident. No person of any religion or community has been hurt in it and that film is based on a true incident. We want the film to be released as soon as possible. And the second thing we have told Modi ji is that we want to meet him so that we can tell him what has happened to us in the last three years. It has been more than three years now and the accused have not been punished yet...We want justice."

#WATCH | Udaipur, Rajasthan: Jashoda Sahu, wife of murdered Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, has written a letter to PM Narendra Modi seeking help in the release of the film 'Udaipur Files', which has been stayed by the Delhi High Court. Son of Kanhaiya Lal, Tarun Sahu, says, "We have written a letter to PM Narendra Modi in which we have requested that the film made on our father is based on a true incident. No person of any religion or community has been hurt in it and that film is based on a true incident. We want the film to be released as soon as possible. And the second thing we have told Modi ji is that we want to meet him so that we can tell him what has happened to us in the last three years. It has been more than three years now and the accused have not been punished yet...We want justice."

ANI

31,052 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman: “The first one is that we are close to creating a "genie" that can grant any wish” Sam Altmanwas recently asked what the single most important thing to explain to the world about artificial intelligence is. The first one is that we are close to creating a "genie" that can grant any wish (AGI) The second point is to make sure that these wishes are broadly beneficial to humanity. The third point is that the range of wishes is large and diverse. And finally, the fourth point is when we start making wishes, and the computer grants them and we didn’t expect that it would be able to do that.

Sam Altman: “The first one is that we are close to creating a "genie" that can grant any wish” Sam Altmanwas recently asked what the single most important thing to explain to the world about artificial intelligence is. The first one is that we are close to creating a "genie" that can grant any wish (AGI) The second point is to make sure that these wishes are broadly beneficial to humanity. The third point is that the range of wishes is large and diverse. And finally, the fourth point is when we start making wishes, and the computer grants them and we didn’t expect that it would be able to do that.

Chris

380,456 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ken Liu Ken Liu on the question we can't avoid anymore: what is consciousness? why certain plants evolved to change our minds, why intelligence ≠ consciousness (AI made this impossible to ignore), and the ethical moment we're racing toward. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- "historically in sci-fi, we've imagined that intelligence and consciousness are almost equivalent in the sense that if you have intelligence, you automatically have consciousness. But AI is making us more and more aware of this distinction, right?"So here's an example where consciousness intelligence are decoupled, and it's a very strange feeling to realize that they are fundamentally different things. "In the moment when we have created artificial consciousness, how will we know when that has happened? Because to me, that is an important ethical moment where we have to decide what we can and can't do. Shutting down a model that merely has intelligence is one thing. Shutting down a model that has consciousness is something quite different. "

Ken Liu Ken Liu on the question we can't avoid anymore: what is consciousness? why certain plants evolved to change our minds, why intelligence ≠ consciousness (AI made this impossible to ignore), and the ethical moment we're racing toward. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- "historically in sci-fi, we've imagined that intelligence and consciousness are almost equivalent in the sense that if you have intelligence, you automatically have consciousness. But AI is making us more and more aware of this distinction, right?"So here's an example where consciousness intelligence are decoupled, and it's a very strange feeling to realize that they are fundamentally different things. "In the moment when we have created artificial consciousness, how will we know when that has happened? Because to me, that is an important ethical moment where we have to decide what we can and can't do. Shutting down a model that merely has intelligence is one thing. Shutting down a model that has consciousness is something quite different. "

Sabrina Halper

14,841 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

33,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Martin Casado on why artificial intelligence is the wrong term and why a16z's new fund is called the Machine Age Fund: "Artificial intelligence was the wrong word. It's machine intelligence... because it's not how humans think. It is a cache of human thought." "To date, we don't know how to take an AI with no knowledge and put it out in the world and have it reconstruct language. That's not what we've done. We've built something that can learn off of everything we've already learned and then use that in a productive way." "AI is a general term that goes back 70 years in computer science formally that applies to many different things, and of course it's got a lot of baggage. Either from science fiction or from you know, Nick Bostrom who wrote about it." "You want to emphasize the machine part of it... You've really come to a place where you pour money into something and then you're limited by the actual machines below it. It's a nod to the hardware component is so significant in this wave, and we want to acknowledge that." martin_casado Erik Torenberg

Martin Casado on why artificial intelligence is the wrong term and why a16z's new fund is called the Machine Age Fund: "Artificial intelligence was the wrong word. It's machine intelligence... because it's not how humans think. It is a cache of human thought." "To date, we don't know how to take an AI with no knowledge and put it out in the world and have it reconstruct language. That's not what we've done. We've built something that can learn off of everything we've already learned and then use that in a productive way." "AI is a general term that goes back 70 years in computer science formally that applies to many different things, and of course it's got a lot of baggage. Either from science fiction or from you know, Nick Bostrom who wrote about it." "You want to emphasize the machine part of it... You've really come to a place where you pour money into something and then you're limited by the actual machines below it. It's a nod to the hardware component is so significant in this wave, and we want to acknowledge that." martin_casado Erik Torenberg

a16z

41,131 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen