Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

What if a simple party game explains why tiny motivated groups keep winning in big institutions? Graham Linehan used the game Werewolf to illustrate the point: two secret werewolves quietly manipulate a whole table of villagers, and the informed minority almost always wins. He says the exact same dynamic...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

449,932 subscribers

33,670 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Holy hell. Graham Linehan on Triggernometry just explained exactly how entire societies get taken over — using a party game invented in the Soviet Union. It’s called Werewolf. You get a card. Most people are villagers. Two people are werewolves. At “night” everyone closes their eyes. The werewolves silently pick someone to kill. Morning comes. A body is revealed.Then the debate begins: “Who are the secret werewolves among us?” The werewolves lie with perfect confidence. They accuse the loudest truth-tellers. They play the victim. They sow doubt, division, guilt. Villagers start turning on each other. Every day the villagers vote to hang one person. Most of the time… they hang another innocent villager. The werewolves almost always win. The game was created in 1986 by a Moscow psychology student to prove one terrifying thesis: “An uninformed majority will ALWAYS be defeated by a tiny, coordinated minority that shares hidden information and has no problem lying 24/7.” Linehan’s unspoken question hangs in the air: Are we the villagers right now? Who woke up this morning and silently chose the next victim? Watch these 60 seconds. Then look around the room. Full hair-raising episode linked in bio. Sound on.
1:00

Holy hell. Graham Linehan on Triggernometry just explained exactly how entire societies get taken over — using a party game invented in the Soviet Union. It’s called Werewolf. You get a card. Most people are villagers. Two people are werewolves. At “night” everyone closes their eyes. The werewolves silently pick someone to kill. Morning comes. A body is revealed.Then the debate begins: “Who are the secret werewolves among us?” The werewolves lie with perfect confidence. They accuse the loudest truth-tellers. They play the victim. They sow doubt, division, guilt. Villagers start turning on each other. Every day the villagers vote to hang one person. Most of the time… they hang another innocent villager. The werewolves almost always win. The game was created in 1986 by a Moscow psychology student to prove one terrifying thesis: “An uninformed majority will ALWAYS be defeated by a tiny, coordinated minority that shares hidden information and has no problem lying 24/7.” Linehan’s unspoken question hangs in the air: Are we the villagers right now? Who woke up this morning and silently chose the next victim? Watch these 60 seconds. Then look around the room. Full hair-raising episode linked in bio. Sound on.

Camus

1,006,157 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

LeBron James says the days of one player holding the ball and ISO all game isn’t the way to win anymore “It’s a numbers game. How can you start the blender. Is the Blender being started with the pass and cut. Is it what the Miami Heat are doing? Or is it what the Lakers are doing where we start a lot of our plays with the Pick and Roll because we have such a dynamic P&R player in Luka” (Via Mind the Game)
1:57

LeBron James says the days of one player holding the ball and ISO all game isn’t the way to win anymore “It’s a numbers game. How can you start the blender. Is the Blender being started with the pass and cut. Is it what the Miami Heat are doing? Or is it what the Lakers are doing where we start a lot of our plays with the Pick and Roll because we have such a dynamic P&R player in Luka” (Via Mind the Game)

Heat Central

316,368 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

What we are witnessing in this video is the exact moment of conception. When the egg and sperm become one, and it is at this moment that a flash of light appears. What do you think is happening right now?
0:30

What we are witnessing in this video is the exact moment of conception. When the egg and sperm become one, and it is at this moment that a flash of light appears. What do you think is happening right now?

Bronze Giant

12,119 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Ever wonder why a tiny group can hijack an entire society? One game explains it perfectly. Graham Linehan breaks down Werewolf (aka Mafia), invented in 1986 by Russian psychology student Dimitry Davidoff at Moscow State University. Quick rules: Most players are clueless villagers. 2 are secret werewolves. Night: Werewolves silently "kill" one villager (eyes closed). Day: Everyone debates—who's the wolf? Vote to lynch someone. Villagers win by eliminating both wolves. Wolves win by thinning the herd to 2 left. Wolves win most games. Why? They know each other + the plan. Everyone else? Guessing in the dark, manipulated by lies and doubt. Davidoff's point: Hidden info lets a coordinated minority dominate an uninformed majority every time. Linehan's implication? Spot the wolves in your world. Playing this at your next party? Or seeing it play out IRL right now?
0:59

Ever wonder why a tiny group can hijack an entire society? One game explains it perfectly. Graham Linehan breaks down Werewolf (aka Mafia), invented in 1986 by Russian psychology student Dimitry Davidoff at Moscow State University. Quick rules: Most players are clueless villagers. 2 are secret werewolves. Night: Werewolves silently "kill" one villager (eyes closed). Day: Everyone debates—who's the wolf? Vote to lynch someone. Villagers win by eliminating both wolves. Wolves win by thinning the herd to 2 left. Wolves win most games. Why? They know each other + the plan. Everyone else? Guessing in the dark, manipulated by lies and doubt. Davidoff's point: Hidden info lets a coordinated minority dominate an uninformed majority every time. Linehan's implication? Spot the wolves in your world. Playing this at your next party? Or seeing it play out IRL right now?

Camus

178,680 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Sometimes the thing that hurts you, isn’t the moment itself, it’s the fact that you keep reliving it. Not once. Not twice. But in patterns that look different outside and feel identical inside. You start wondering why it keeps happening. Why the same fears return. Why the same version of you shows up even when you swore you were done with him. Most people think life moves in a straight line. But the Vishnu Purana says something completely different: “Krita, Treta, Dvapara and Kali, these ages turn like a wheel.” A wheel. Not a timeline. A rotation that keeps circling back until something in you changes. Centuries later, Nietzsche said almost the same thing, his idea of “eternal recurrence.” If you had to live this day again and again, would you be proud of it, or terrified that you’re still choosing the same life? And even modern physics keeps stumbling toward the same shape, cyclic universe models, Big Bangs followed by cosmic “bounces,” universe after universe rising from the ashes of the last. Once you see this, your own life starts making a different kind of sense. You stop blaming fate and start noticing your habits. You stop praying for a new life while living the old one on autopilot. Because you’re not trapped in a cycle. You’re participating in one. So ask yourself, What keeps returning because you haven’t faced it yet? What pattern keeps knocking like a teacher you ignore? What moment repeats because you haven’t shown up differently? In a universe where time moves in circles, even the smallest choice isn’t small. It becomes a pattern. A future. A repetition, or a release. Maybe this is the moment where the wheel comes back around and you finally choose a different version of you. Maybe this is your cycle break.
2:55

Sometimes the thing that hurts you, isn’t the moment itself, it’s the fact that you keep reliving it. Not once. Not twice. But in patterns that look different outside and feel identical inside. You start wondering why it keeps happening. Why the same fears return. Why the same version of you shows up even when you swore you were done with him. Most people think life moves in a straight line. But the Vishnu Purana says something completely different: “Krita, Treta, Dvapara and Kali, these ages turn like a wheel.” A wheel. Not a timeline. A rotation that keeps circling back until something in you changes. Centuries later, Nietzsche said almost the same thing, his idea of “eternal recurrence.” If you had to live this day again and again, would you be proud of it, or terrified that you’re still choosing the same life? And even modern physics keeps stumbling toward the same shape, cyclic universe models, Big Bangs followed by cosmic “bounces,” universe after universe rising from the ashes of the last. Once you see this, your own life starts making a different kind of sense. You stop blaming fate and start noticing your habits. You stop praying for a new life while living the old one on autopilot. Because you’re not trapped in a cycle. You’re participating in one. So ask yourself, What keeps returning because you haven’t faced it yet? What pattern keeps knocking like a teacher you ignore? What moment repeats because you haven’t shown up differently? In a universe where time moves in circles, even the smallest choice isn’t small. It becomes a pattern. A future. A repetition, or a release. Maybe this is the moment where the wheel comes back around and you finally choose a different version of you. Maybe this is your cycle break.

Wisdom Walk

11,296 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Bellows: The DOJ asked for the sensitive personal voter information — not just of me and Maine voters, but of every Secretary of State… And also, just think for a moment—why do they want it? Because in the absence of a very good reason, you start to think, okay, well, how might they use it? And do we really want the Justice Department checking to see if you’re a Democrat or a Republican before they make a decision about who to investigate? And so this idea that they’re going to collect all of this information on everyone in the country is really out of bounds and very dangerous.
2:36

Bellows: The DOJ asked for the sensitive personal voter information — not just of me and Maine voters, but of every Secretary of State… And also, just think for a moment—why do they want it? Because in the absence of a very good reason, you start to think, okay, well, how might they use it? And do we really want the Justice Department checking to see if you’re a Democrat or a Republican before they make a decision about who to investigate? And so this idea that they’re going to collect all of this information on everyone in the country is really out of bounds and very dangerous.

Acyn

52,699 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 THE PATTERN NO ONE WANTS TO TALK ABOUT Why are Western nations all moving in the SAME direction… at the SAME time? Europe. Canada. Australia. Same policies. Same outcomes. Same decline. This isn’t just about Covid. This isn’t just about immigration. This is bigger. At what point do we stop calling it coincidence… and start asking if it’s coordinated? Because when you step back, the pattern is clear. And if it continues, the result is inevitable: The slow dismantling of the Western world as we once knew it. Wake up.
1:15

🚨 THE PATTERN NO ONE WANTS TO TALK ABOUT Why are Western nations all moving in the SAME direction… at the SAME time? Europe. Canada. Australia. Same policies. Same outcomes. Same decline. This isn’t just about Covid. This isn’t just about immigration. This is bigger. At what point do we stop calling it coincidence… and start asking if it’s coordinated? Because when you step back, the pattern is clear. And if it continues, the result is inevitable: The slow dismantling of the Western world as we once knew it. Wake up.

George Mamalis

107,732 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🎥 || Lewis Hamilton after first runs in the SF-26. “Immediately you’re trying to get a feel for anything, feeling through your body, through the G-long, through the vibrations of the seat and the suspension. You’re trying to pick up all these little bits of information in the little time that you have and then just to be in Fiorano, you know, to be at Ferrari, to be here, to know that this is a start of a long journey.” “But one that I know that it just feels right, I think the team is in the best place, it’s been, I think for the time I’ve been here. And seeing everyone so motivated and driven, I think we’re really on it.” “We’ve got a lot of work to do to really make sure we do all the diligence and we really understand this car and we really have to be quick to react, be very dynamic but I feel like all hands are on deck so I’m sure we can do that.”
1:03

🎥 || Lewis Hamilton after first runs in the SF-26. “Immediately you’re trying to get a feel for anything, feeling through your body, through the G-long, through the vibrations of the seat and the suspension. You’re trying to pick up all these little bits of information in the little time that you have and then just to be in Fiorano, you know, to be at Ferrari, to be here, to know that this is a start of a long journey.” “But one that I know that it just feels right, I think the team is in the best place, it’s been, I think for the time I’ve been here. And seeing everyone so motivated and driven, I think we’re really on it.” “We’ve got a lot of work to do to really make sure we do all the diligence and we really understand this car and we really have to be quick to react, be very dynamic but I feel like all hands are on deck so I’m sure we can do that.”

sin ⁴⁴

106,625 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Ben Affleck explained how the paparazzi game really works — and it’s pretty dark. On Theo Von’s podcast, he said that when you see a photo of a celebrity looking pissed off or miserable, it’s often because someone just spent 20 minutes harassing them and their kids trying to get that exact reaction. Then they sell the “angry celeb” picture. He compared it to poking a tiger with a stick and then filming it growling. You don’t see the provocation — just the reaction. Ben pointed out this is exactly what happened with Britney Spears back in the day. This one stuck with me. We consume these moments like entertainment, but we rarely see how manufactured a lot of it is. What we think is “reality” in celebrity culture is often heavily edited drama created by the people taking the photos. When’s the last time you saw a “celeb meltdown” photo and wondered what happened right before the camera clicked?
2:59

Ben Affleck explained how the paparazzi game really works — and it’s pretty dark. On Theo Von’s podcast, he said that when you see a photo of a celebrity looking pissed off or miserable, it’s often because someone just spent 20 minutes harassing them and their kids trying to get that exact reaction. Then they sell the “angry celeb” picture. He compared it to poking a tiger with a stick and then filming it growling. You don’t see the provocation — just the reaction. Ben pointed out this is exactly what happened with Britney Spears back in the day. This one stuck with me. We consume these moments like entertainment, but we rarely see how manufactured a lot of it is. What we think is “reality” in celebrity culture is often heavily edited drama created by the people taking the photos. When’s the last time you saw a “celeb meltdown” photo and wondered what happened right before the camera clicked?

Camus

1,304,692 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen explains why your initial vision for your company is probably wrong When Ryan first applied to Y Combinator he wanted Flexport to be “TurboTax for customs.” But that vision changed a lot. As Ryan explains: “The more you learn and the more customers you talk to and the more vendors you talk to, the more you realize how screwed up the world is in this space. Then [the vision] actually gets bigger and bigger and keeps expanding.” Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan says this is a common pattern he sees in startups too: “There’s a misconception that you wake up from a haze and you’re like ‘This is it. This is the vision.” But the story is actually ‘Oh here’s this thing that I know I can solve.’ And then once you solve it and people really like it, it sort of expands and expands.” Ryan concludes: “If a founder is too certain of exactly what the vision is and what the product’s going to look like and how it’s all going to work, they’re probably wrong. The world is super messy.” Source: Garry Tan (Mar 2022)
0:54

Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen explains why your initial vision for your company is probably wrong When Ryan first applied to Y Combinator he wanted Flexport to be “TurboTax for customs.” But that vision changed a lot. As Ryan explains: “The more you learn and the more customers you talk to and the more vendors you talk to, the more you realize how screwed up the world is in this space. Then [the vision] actually gets bigger and bigger and keeps expanding.” Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan says this is a common pattern he sees in startups too: “There’s a misconception that you wake up from a haze and you’re like ‘This is it. This is the vision.” But the story is actually ‘Oh here’s this thing that I know I can solve.’ And then once you solve it and people really like it, it sort of expands and expands.” Ryan concludes: “If a founder is too certain of exactly what the vision is and what the product’s going to look like and how it’s all going to work, they’re probably wrong. The world is super messy.” Source: Garry Tan (Mar 2022)

Startup Archive

26,261 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Grant Cardone explains why $400,000/year is NOT a lot of money Grant: "If you live in the state of California, $400,000 is really $260,000. And after the cost of living, electricity, taxes, insurance, etc., you're probably down to $100,000. And $100,000 today in this country in almost any place except maybe, you know, rural Midwest, it's not a lot of money." Graham Stephan: "So if someone has the ability to make a lot of money, but they're not doing it, what do you think is holding them back?" Grant: “You're like, 'Oh, the moral compass, it's not about money.' I'm like, dude, if you have a wife and two kids or three kids, two parents that are aging, you know, and any other responsibilities in the community that you consider yourself responsible for some participation in the game... You need to make more money."
0:45

Grant Cardone explains why $400,000/year is NOT a lot of money Grant: "If you live in the state of California, $400,000 is really $260,000. And after the cost of living, electricity, taxes, insurance, etc., you're probably down to $100,000. And $100,000 today in this country in almost any place except maybe, you know, rural Midwest, it's not a lot of money." Graham Stephan: "So if someone has the ability to make a lot of money, but they're not doing it, what do you think is holding them back?" Grant: “You're like, 'Oh, the moral compass, it's not about money.' I'm like, dude, if you have a wife and two kids or three kids, two parents that are aging, you know, and any other responsibilities in the community that you consider yourself responsible for some participation in the game... You need to make more money."

The Iced Coffee Hour

31,239 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Meiselas: As all of this information has flooded the zone, you’d think that would be a good thing—that people would get more educated. But paradoxically, I think it’s brought us back to the Dark Ages and feudal times, because a lot of information doesn’t necessarily mean good information. And so, with AI and all the data that’s out there, what I think right-wing authoritarians want to create is this kind of lord-versus-peasant dynamic that existed in the Dark Ages, when people didn’t have access to information.
0:46

Meiselas: As all of this information has flooded the zone, you’d think that would be a good thing—that people would get more educated. But paradoxically, I think it’s brought us back to the Dark Ages and feudal times, because a lot of information doesn’t necessarily mean good information. And so, with AI and all the data that’s out there, what I think right-wing authoritarians want to create is this kind of lord-versus-peasant dynamic that existed in the Dark Ages, when people didn’t have access to information.

MeidasTouch

76,759 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Shawn Ryan explains why one military lie shattered his trust in every institution in America: “The whole country is built off dishonesty—literally lies.” "But anyway, the point being, that’s just one institution inside the U.S. Navy. That’s it. One small—SEAL Teams are a very, very small part of the U.S. Navy. And then he’s talking about Ranger Battalion, and then there are all these other units. It just made me think: Man, this is just one war, in one small part of the U.S. government—a very small part. So that means every single U.S. institution out there is doing the same shit. Obviously the CIA, obviously the FBI—everything. All of Congress, all of the Senate, everybody in it. The presidents—everybody. And it just made me realize how the whole country is built off dishonesty—literally lies. Then you think, man, I’m only 43 years old. That’s a very small snippet in the history of the country, let alone the world—and all the other countries and all of their institutions. And then it’s just like what we said last time: Everything is a lie. Everything you fucking know is a lie. Everything you think you know, everything in the history books—it’s all fucking lies. All of it."
1:03

Shawn Ryan explains why one military lie shattered his trust in every institution in America: “The whole country is built off dishonesty—literally lies.” "But anyway, the point being, that’s just one institution inside the U.S. Navy. That’s it. One small—SEAL Teams are a very, very small part of the U.S. Navy. And then he’s talking about Ranger Battalion, and then there are all these other units. It just made me think: Man, this is just one war, in one small part of the U.S. government—a very small part. So that means every single U.S. institution out there is doing the same shit. Obviously the CIA, obviously the FBI—everything. All of Congress, all of the Senate, everybody in it. The presidents—everybody. And it just made me realize how the whole country is built off dishonesty—literally lies. Then you think, man, I’m only 43 years old. That’s a very small snippet in the history of the country, let alone the world—and all the other countries and all of their institutions. And then it’s just like what we said last time: Everything is a lie. Everything you fucking know is a lie. Everything you think you know, everything in the history books—it’s all fucking lies. All of it."

Mati

46,888 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Victor Wembanyama was asked in French about his pregame outfit, playing in big games, how he feels physically, and what he thought of Harper’s game: 🇫🇷: Victor, I know it’s still very fresh right now, but are you able to take a step back and realize the journey you’ve already made to get here? 👽: No, not at all. And I really don’t want to. 🇫🇷: Victor, we saw you giving a big speech to your teammates on the court right before the game started. What was the message? 👽: I don’t remember. 🇫🇷: And emotionally, before this game—it was your first elimination game in the playoffs. Did the approach remind you of other big games you’ve experienced before? 👽: Of course. It reminded me of a lot of them, at every level. Because today, winning in the NBA means just as much to me as winning back when I was playing at the middle-school level or in regional competitions! (laughs) Competitiveness has always been the same for me. 🇫🇷: Victor, how do you feel physically after these six games heading into Game 7? And do you learn in a series like this that there are going to be physical ups and downs that you have to manage? 👽: There’s definitely some of that. But I also think there’s a sort of numbness, because right now the desire to win is stronger than the pain. So honestly, I’d say I feel great! 🇫🇷: I’ve got a quick question about your outfit before the game—was it a little nod to monks? Was it for Eid? And what did you think of Dylan Harper’s game, and of his ability to constantly drive and stay aggressive attacking the rim? 👽: Those are two completely unrelated questions. (laughs) No, it had nothing to do with monks—yeah, it was for Eid. And as for Dylan, he’s impressive as always. You never really know what a player is going to look like until they’ve gone through games like this, and it’s great to see that he’s built for it. (Thanks to @ orewaddl for the translation) #GoSpursGo #PorVida
1:47

Victor Wembanyama was asked in French about his pregame outfit, playing in big games, how he feels physically, and what he thought of Harper’s game: 🇫🇷: Victor, I know it’s still very fresh right now, but are you able to take a step back and realize the journey you’ve already made to get here? 👽: No, not at all. And I really don’t want to. 🇫🇷: Victor, we saw you giving a big speech to your teammates on the court right before the game started. What was the message? 👽: I don’t remember. 🇫🇷: And emotionally, before this game—it was your first elimination game in the playoffs. Did the approach remind you of other big games you’ve experienced before? 👽: Of course. It reminded me of a lot of them, at every level. Because today, winning in the NBA means just as much to me as winning back when I was playing at the middle-school level or in regional competitions! (laughs) Competitiveness has always been the same for me. 🇫🇷: Victor, how do you feel physically after these six games heading into Game 7? And do you learn in a series like this that there are going to be physical ups and downs that you have to manage? 👽: There’s definitely some of that. But I also think there’s a sort of numbness, because right now the desire to win is stronger than the pain. So honestly, I’d say I feel great! 🇫🇷: I’ve got a quick question about your outfit before the game—was it a little nod to monks? Was it for Eid? And what did you think of Dylan Harper’s game, and of his ability to constantly drive and stay aggressive attacking the rim? 👽: Those are two completely unrelated questions. (laughs) No, it had nothing to do with monks—yeah, it was for Eid. And as for Dylan, he’s impressive as always. You never really know what a player is going to look like until they’ve gone through games like this, and it’s great to see that he’s built for it. (Thanks to @ orewaddl for the translation) #GoSpursGo #PorVida

Wemby Alien Era

286,008 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sadly, can’t clip the entire podcast Jeremy Boreing did with Dan Burmawi but this five minutes talks about the near erasure of Christianity in the Middle East done in the name of Islam. I urge everyone to watch the full two hours if you want to understand why you see what you see and what the way forward is. One of the most important episodes I have seen and this is a topic I spend a lot of time in.
4:14

Sadly, can’t clip the entire podcast Jeremy Boreing did with Dan Burmawi but this five minutes talks about the near erasure of Christianity in the Middle East done in the name of Islam. I urge everyone to watch the full two hours if you want to understand why you see what you see and what the way forward is. One of the most important episodes I have seen and this is a topic I spend a lot of time in.

Insurrection Barbie

49,205 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Amar'e Stoudemire says there is no point guard in today’s game that he would want to play with, it’s no true point guards in the NBA today: “Because for me, you know, as a big sometimes you rely on that ball coming to you. You can’t just grab the rebound and take it yourself and just do your own thing a lot of times, right? So, you need a point guard that can help facilitate the game with you. And I don’t really see a point guard right now in the league that’s that pass first, no look passing behind the back passing point guard what happend to that. I don’t understand where it’s at?” (Via Cousins with Vince Carter & Tracy McGrady)
2:13

Amar'e Stoudemire says there is no point guard in today’s game that he would want to play with, it’s no true point guards in the NBA today: “Because for me, you know, as a big sometimes you rely on that ball coming to you. You can’t just grab the rebound and take it yourself and just do your own thing a lot of times, right? So, you need a point guard that can help facilitate the game with you. And I don’t really see a point guard right now in the league that’s that pass first, no look passing behind the back passing point guard what happend to that. I don’t understand where it’s at?” (Via Cousins with Vince Carter & Tracy McGrady)

NBA Courtside

455,439 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Paul Pierce says if LeBron James wins a championship somewhere else, it doesn’t elevate what he’s already accomplished: “Even if he wins one in Cleveland, it’s not going to be the same as winning one in Miami, winning one for LA because he was the guy. You know, it doesn’t put him in the same category, when we start talking about when he’s done and the comparisons with Mike, because we’re always going to do that. Let’s just keep it 100. Mike was always the one.” (Via No Fouls Given)
2:44

Paul Pierce says if LeBron James wins a championship somewhere else, it doesn’t elevate what he’s already accomplished: “Even if he wins one in Cleveland, it’s not going to be the same as winning one in Miami, winning one for LA because he was the guy. You know, it doesn’t put him in the same category, when we start talking about when he’s done and the comparisons with Mike, because we’re always going to do that. Let’s just keep it 100. Mike was always the one.” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

171,349 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Wordle becoming a game show is a great idea, but I think I’ve got an even better one: “What’s On Your Wrist?” Contestants have to guess the value of luxury watches and trust me, it’s harder than you may think. Most people can’t do it, one watch may be worth millions and the other a few hundred dollars. And yes, if you guess right you keep the watch! What do you think about this game show idea?
0:42

Wordle becoming a game show is a great idea, but I think I’ve got an even better one: “What’s On Your Wrist?” Contestants have to guess the value of luxury watches and trust me, it’s harder than you may think. Most people can’t do it, one watch may be worth millions and the other a few hundred dollars. And yes, if you guess right you keep the watch! What do you think about this game show idea?

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

13,174 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Billy Donovan shares a lesson that changed how his players thought about winning. At Florida, he had a manager track how long the ball was in each player's hands during a game. He asked one of his starters: "How many minutes do you think you had the ball in your hands for the game?" The player said 15 minutes when he had played 30. The real numbers? "A backcourt player, for the most part, is probably 92% of the game gonna be played without the ball in their hands. A frontcourt player - 95% of their minutes is gonna be played without the ball in their hands." Think about that. You're playing without the ball almost the entire game. "It's amazing to me how many players focus on points, points, points. That's what goes on ESPN. That's what gets the highlights." "But if you're gonna strictly talk about winning and you're really driven and motivated by winning and competing and being a good teammate, you have to look at the fact is -- what am I doing with my 92, 93, 94, 95%?" "Am I screening? Am I running the floor? Am I on the floor for loose basketballs? Am I rebounding? Am I taking a charge?" "There's so many ways to impact the game with the amount of time you're on the floor when the ball's not in your hands." This is what separates good players from winning players. You control how you show up. You control your attitude. You control your effort. Great teammates master what they do when no one's watching - and when the ball isn't in their hands. Winning isn't about the glamour. It's about the 95%. (🎥Coaching U ) (🎥Brendan Suhr)
1:47

Billy Donovan shares a lesson that changed how his players thought about winning. At Florida, he had a manager track how long the ball was in each player's hands during a game. He asked one of his starters: "How many minutes do you think you had the ball in your hands for the game?" The player said 15 minutes when he had played 30. The real numbers? "A backcourt player, for the most part, is probably 92% of the game gonna be played without the ball in their hands. A frontcourt player - 95% of their minutes is gonna be played without the ball in their hands." Think about that. You're playing without the ball almost the entire game. "It's amazing to me how many players focus on points, points, points. That's what goes on ESPN. That's what gets the highlights." "But if you're gonna strictly talk about winning and you're really driven and motivated by winning and competing and being a good teammate, you have to look at the fact is -- what am I doing with my 92, 93, 94, 95%?" "Am I screening? Am I running the floor? Am I on the floor for loose basketballs? Am I rebounding? Am I taking a charge?" "There's so many ways to impact the game with the amount of time you're on the floor when the ball's not in your hands." This is what separates good players from winning players. You control how you show up. You control your attitude. You control your effort. Great teammates master what they do when no one's watching - and when the ball isn't in their hands. Winning isn't about the glamour. It's about the 95%. (🎥Coaching U ) (🎥Brendan Suhr)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

1,433,920 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад