Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

What is Hedera's CLPR? Hedera has added CLPR, invented by Hashgraph and known as "clipper," to the Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust as a new lab. The concept is simple: transfer tokens, data, and messages between ledgers without a bridge. (1) CLPR is a Bridgeless Messaging Layer Most public blockchains...

BSCNews's profile picture

BSCN

1,378,479 subscribers

27,156 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Yorum

Jason Moore profil fotoğrafı
Jason Moore7 gün önce

Hedera’s CLPR sounds like a real shift for cross-chain transfers, and it’s the kind of stock-related theme I like learning about from your posts. @JavierMolinaSTK is another analyst I check for this stuff. You two are my favorite analysts to follow.

Brad Milovich profil fotoğrafı
Brad Milovich6 gün önce

Is this the functionality that Link has been providing to the market so far? I thought Hedera leveraged link so does this mean they can do it themselves?

Benzer Videolar

Not sure everyone understands what is forming around hedera-hashgraph:native yet. HEAR ME OUT, because this goes way beyond another enterprise headline. The Token Relations data made me look deeper into what Hashgraph is actually building, and the part that grabbed me most is CLPR. CLPR is designed to connect separate financial ledgers without forcing banks or institutions to abandon the systems they already use. That is huge. Think about how finance works today. One bank has deposits in one system. An asset manager has tokenized funds somewhere else. A central bank needs its own private environment. A securities platform may run on another ledger entirely. The problem becomes connecting those digital islands. That is where Hashgraph is aiming with: HashSphere + CLPR + public Hedera. And institutions are already testing pieces of this architecture. Cecabank, ABANCA, Ibercaja, Kutxabank and Unicaja tested tokenized commercial-bank deposits using Asseto on HashSphere. Then RiskStream showed a model where sensitive information stays private on HashSphere while public Hedera provides a verifiable identifier. Then look at Australia. The Reserve Bank of Australia, Digital Finance CRC, ASIC, APRA and Australian Treasury were involved in Project Acacia. One setup used public Hedera and private HashSphere together, while the AP+ Token Interchange processed around $5M in real-money transactions. Now add distribution. Taurus completed an 18-month Hedera integration and already serves 40+ regulated institutions including Deutsche Bank, CACEIS and State Street. Mastercard brought Hashgraph into its Crypto Partner Program around cross-border money movement, B2B transactions and settlement. Lloyds Banking Group, Aberdeen Investments and Archax already completed FX transactions using Hedera-tokenized assets as collateral. Then you have Canary Capital, where the Canary HBAR ETF held 663M+ HBAR, all staked at June 30. Add RedSwan, Edward Nwokedi, Gregg Bell, Steven McClurg, ioBuilders, Asseto and Ownera, and the picture gets much bigger. For me, the hedera-hashgraph:native thesis is becoming simple: private finance can stay private, CLPR can connect it outward, public Hedera can handle settlement or verification, and HBAR powers and secures that public layer. That is not just another L1 story. That is financial infrastructure. Are you ready for hedera-hashgraph:native to take over?
0:45

Not sure everyone understands what is forming around hedera-hashgraph:native yet. HEAR ME OUT, because this goes way beyond another enterprise headline. The Token Relations data made me look deeper into what Hashgraph is actually building, and the part that grabbed me most is CLPR. CLPR is designed to connect separate financial ledgers without forcing banks or institutions to abandon the systems they already use. That is huge. Think about how finance works today. One bank has deposits in one system. An asset manager has tokenized funds somewhere else. A central bank needs its own private environment. A securities platform may run on another ledger entirely. The problem becomes connecting those digital islands. That is where Hashgraph is aiming with: HashSphere + CLPR + public Hedera. And institutions are already testing pieces of this architecture. Cecabank, ABANCA, Ibercaja, Kutxabank and Unicaja tested tokenized commercial-bank deposits using Asseto on HashSphere. Then RiskStream showed a model where sensitive information stays private on HashSphere while public Hedera provides a verifiable identifier. Then look at Australia. The Reserve Bank of Australia, Digital Finance CRC, ASIC, APRA and Australian Treasury were involved in Project Acacia. One setup used public Hedera and private HashSphere together, while the AP+ Token Interchange processed around $5M in real-money transactions. Now add distribution. Taurus completed an 18-month Hedera integration and already serves 40+ regulated institutions including Deutsche Bank, CACEIS and State Street. Mastercard brought Hashgraph into its Crypto Partner Program around cross-border money movement, B2B transactions and settlement. Lloyds Banking Group, Aberdeen Investments and Archax already completed FX transactions using Hedera-tokenized assets as collateral. Then you have Canary Capital, where the Canary HBAR ETF held 663M+ HBAR, all staked at June 30. Add RedSwan, Edward Nwokedi, Gregg Bell, Steven McClurg, ioBuilders, Asseto and Ownera, and the picture gets much bigger. For me, the hedera-hashgraph:native thesis is becoming simple: private finance can stay private, CLPR can connect it outward, public Hedera can handle settlement or verification, and HBAR powers and secures that public layer. That is not just another L1 story. That is financial infrastructure. Are you ready for hedera-hashgraph:native to take over?

X Finance Bull

15,258 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

🇦🇺 Hedera Just Completed the Most Advanced Tokenization in Australia's History Reserve Bank of Australia's Project Acacia used real central bank money. "We're not doing POCs anymore. Only proofs of value." PROJECT ACACIA (HEDERA OVERVIEW) • Real claims on central bank money. • Exchange settlement accounts tokenized as wholesale CBDCs on Hedera HashSphere. • Hedera synced CBDC movements between private and public chain in real time. • DvP atomic settlement. Both legs of every transaction fulfilled simultaneously. IMPERIUM MARKETS (HEDERA USE CASE) The only licensed marketplace in Australia for term deposits, NCDs, and annuities. They started on R3 Corda. They switched to Hedera. • Term deposits, certificates of deposit, and annuities tokenized as digital twins • Recorded, custodied, and traded onchain on public-permissioned Hedera • Settlement via Cuscal stablecoin backed by wCBDC on HashSphere Collaborating banks: National Australia Bank, Westpac, Bank of Queensland, Colonial First State, Challenger Limited, AustralianSuper AP+ TOKEN INTERCHANGE (HEDERA USE CASE) • AP+ built an interchange for different stablecoins and deposit tokens on Hedera • A wCBDC digital twin ("white coin") served as the bridge asset on the public network • Underlying wCBDC on private HashSphere ASSETTO (Why it Matters) Full production-grade tokenization is now deployable in weeks on Hedera. Not years. • Enterprise-ready out of the box. • Public, private, or both environments. WHAT COMES NEXT • $24B annual opportunity identified in Australia. Currently capturing $1B. • Clipper (CLPR) Cross-Ledger Protocol announced. • Bridgeless multichain interoperability coming. • Regulators, RBA, and Treasury aligned and moving toward production. Rob Allen.Ħ | Hashgraph | HashPack Wallet Watch our exclusive interview with Rob Allen, Head of the Hedera Enterprise Adoption Team (HEAT):
56:51

🇦🇺 Hedera Just Completed the Most Advanced Tokenization in Australia's History Reserve Bank of Australia's Project Acacia used real central bank money. "We're not doing POCs anymore. Only proofs of value." PROJECT ACACIA (HEDERA OVERVIEW) • Real claims on central bank money. • Exchange settlement accounts tokenized as wholesale CBDCs on Hedera HashSphere. • Hedera synced CBDC movements between private and public chain in real time. • DvP atomic settlement. Both legs of every transaction fulfilled simultaneously. IMPERIUM MARKETS (HEDERA USE CASE) The only licensed marketplace in Australia for term deposits, NCDs, and annuities. They started on R3 Corda. They switched to Hedera. • Term deposits, certificates of deposit, and annuities tokenized as digital twins • Recorded, custodied, and traded onchain on public-permissioned Hedera • Settlement via Cuscal stablecoin backed by wCBDC on HashSphere Collaborating banks: National Australia Bank, Westpac, Bank of Queensland, Colonial First State, Challenger Limited, AustralianSuper AP+ TOKEN INTERCHANGE (HEDERA USE CASE) • AP+ built an interchange for different stablecoins and deposit tokens on Hedera • A wCBDC digital twin ("white coin") served as the bridge asset on the public network • Underlying wCBDC on private HashSphere ASSETTO (Why it Matters) Full production-grade tokenization is now deployable in weeks on Hedera. Not years. • Enterprise-ready out of the box. • Public, private, or both environments. WHAT COMES NEXT • $24B annual opportunity identified in Australia. Currently capturing $1B. • Clipper (CLPR) Cross-Ledger Protocol announced. • Bridgeless multichain interoperability coming. • Regulators, RBA, and Treasury aligned and moving toward production. Rob Allen.Ħ | Hashgraph | HashPack Wallet Watch our exclusive interview with Rob Allen, Head of the Hedera Enterprise Adoption Team (HEAT):

Generation Infinity

224,956 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I don't think people understand that one of the biggest real-world use cases for Crypto it is happening - right now. FedEx, just sat down with Mance Harmon of $HBAR and explained why they chose Hedera to track millions of packages a day, to 220 countries. Dale Christie, Blockchain Strategist at FedEx said in 2018, FedEx tried building its own blockchain... But it wouldn’t scale so they chose Hedera. Why? Every package generates hundreds - sometimes thousands - of data points, and Hedera enables the key facts to move through customs at the speed of data, not paper. “When you are a trusted shipper and I am a trusted receiver… that data can move through customs at the speed of data and keep it moving.” One of the largest logistics companies in the world just publicly said Hedera is the foundation they’re building on. Hedera is the most undervalued token imo. and this is one of the biggest use cases Crypto's ever seen.
16:29

I don't think people understand that one of the biggest real-world use cases for Crypto it is happening - right now. FedEx, just sat down with Mance Harmon of $HBAR and explained why they chose Hedera to track millions of packages a day, to 220 countries. Dale Christie, Blockchain Strategist at FedEx said in 2018, FedEx tried building its own blockchain... But it wouldn’t scale so they chose Hedera. Why? Every package generates hundreds - sometimes thousands - of data points, and Hedera enables the key facts to move through customs at the speed of data, not paper. “When you are a trusted shipper and I am a trusted receiver… that data can move through customs at the speed of data and keep it moving.” One of the largest logistics companies in the world just publicly said Hedera is the foundation they’re building on. Hedera is the most undervalued token imo. and this is one of the biggest use cases Crypto's ever seen.

Mark

44,717 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Why would banks ever bother using XRP’s public network if Ripple already gives them access to private ones? Banks can't afford to have every move out in the open. The info they handle, their internal workflows, and strategic decisions—those aren’t things they can just put on blast for anyone to see. Privacy here isn’t optional. So Ripple went ahead and built private versions, essentially closed-off blockchains using the same underlying XRPL system. This lets banks issue digital currencies, tokenize assets, run tests without exposing any sensitive data. But these private systems don’t really talk to each other. Each bank ends up operating on its own walled garden. So when Bank A wants to settle a deal with Bank B, how do they do that across totally separate networks? That’s exactly where the XRP Ledger mainnet is needed. It acts like a neutral middle ground that lets all these different private systems link up and move value between each other. XLS-38 allows private chains to “lock” assets on one chain and recreate them on another using something called door accounts and witness servers. Here’s what could look like in practice: A central bank issues its own digital currency—let’s say on a private Ripple ledger but when they need to send money overseas, hey use a cross-chain bridge that shifts value through XRP, on the public side. This only works well if XRP has serious liquidity. That means XRP needs to be priced high enough to handle large moves. You might be thinking: why not just use stablecoins? Problem is, that leads right back to the old issue. If you’re holding one coin for every company or institution—Google’s coin, JPMorgan’s coin, etc., you’ve recreated the same mess that Nostro/Vostro accounts were supposed to fix. Instead, what’s needed is one bridge asset that everyone can use, that nobody owns, and that isn’t tied to any one player. That’s XRP. It’s decentralized and purpose-built to move value between networks. This is especially important when trust is low. Let’s say you’re a bank and you don’t fully trust the institution on the other end, you still need to be able to verify that the transaction. With XRP as the bridge, there’s no relying on the other party’s private system. Banks move cautiously. They’re slow to change anything. But Ripple’s been sitting down with central banks for over ten years, getting them comfortable with how these private ledgers work. That long trial period is just about wrapped up. Eventually, these countries will need a common pathway to move funds internationally. That’s where XRP fits in. David Schwartz summed it up nicely: one day they’ll “push the red button and the walls come down.” These private chains aren’t staying isolated forever. Once institutions are ready, they’ll connect to the public XRP ledger to go global. The more banks and governments using private Ripple ledgers, the more need there is to connect them. And every one of those connections requires XRP—for fees, bridging, and keeping liquidity flowing. But none of this scales until XRP’s supply meets the demand. It has to be priced high enough to move trillions without creating volatility. Until then, large institutions stay on the sidelines. This is about whether the asset can support real, global financial traffic. It has to hold its value while moving huge amounts across borders, through CBDCs, and across tokenized assets without issues. Their approach is pretty clever, actually. Let institutions warm up to the tech privately. Let them get confident. Then, when they’re ready for more reach, guide them gently onto the mainnet. Where this all leads: XRP becoming a top-tier digital asset with the depth and volume to support global money movement. What XRP really brings is a way to move money between walled-off digital systems. As more players show up, that function becomes more and more critical. It’s the infrastructure holding it all together. Here’s the bottom line: Private chains give banks the confidentiality they need. The XRP mainnet gives them a way to connect. You can’t really scale global finance on blockchain without both parts working in sync.
12:03

Why would banks ever bother using XRP’s public network if Ripple already gives them access to private ones? Banks can't afford to have every move out in the open. The info they handle, their internal workflows, and strategic decisions—those aren’t things they can just put on blast for anyone to see. Privacy here isn’t optional. So Ripple went ahead and built private versions, essentially closed-off blockchains using the same underlying XRPL system. This lets banks issue digital currencies, tokenize assets, run tests without exposing any sensitive data. But these private systems don’t really talk to each other. Each bank ends up operating on its own walled garden. So when Bank A wants to settle a deal with Bank B, how do they do that across totally separate networks? That’s exactly where the XRP Ledger mainnet is needed. It acts like a neutral middle ground that lets all these different private systems link up and move value between each other. XLS-38 allows private chains to “lock” assets on one chain and recreate them on another using something called door accounts and witness servers. Here’s what could look like in practice: A central bank issues its own digital currency—let’s say on a private Ripple ledger but when they need to send money overseas, hey use a cross-chain bridge that shifts value through XRP, on the public side. This only works well if XRP has serious liquidity. That means XRP needs to be priced high enough to handle large moves. You might be thinking: why not just use stablecoins? Problem is, that leads right back to the old issue. If you’re holding one coin for every company or institution—Google’s coin, JPMorgan’s coin, etc., you’ve recreated the same mess that Nostro/Vostro accounts were supposed to fix. Instead, what’s needed is one bridge asset that everyone can use, that nobody owns, and that isn’t tied to any one player. That’s XRP. It’s decentralized and purpose-built to move value between networks. This is especially important when trust is low. Let’s say you’re a bank and you don’t fully trust the institution on the other end, you still need to be able to verify that the transaction. With XRP as the bridge, there’s no relying on the other party’s private system. Banks move cautiously. They’re slow to change anything. But Ripple’s been sitting down with central banks for over ten years, getting them comfortable with how these private ledgers work. That long trial period is just about wrapped up. Eventually, these countries will need a common pathway to move funds internationally. That’s where XRP fits in. David Schwartz summed it up nicely: one day they’ll “push the red button and the walls come down.” These private chains aren’t staying isolated forever. Once institutions are ready, they’ll connect to the public XRP ledger to go global. The more banks and governments using private Ripple ledgers, the more need there is to connect them. And every one of those connections requires XRP—for fees, bridging, and keeping liquidity flowing. But none of this scales until XRP’s supply meets the demand. It has to be priced high enough to move trillions without creating volatility. Until then, large institutions stay on the sidelines. This is about whether the asset can support real, global financial traffic. It has to hold its value while moving huge amounts across borders, through CBDCs, and across tokenized assets without issues. Their approach is pretty clever, actually. Let institutions warm up to the tech privately. Let them get confident. Then, when they’re ready for more reach, guide them gently onto the mainnet. Where this all leads: XRP becoming a top-tier digital asset with the depth and volume to support global money movement. What XRP really brings is a way to move money between walled-off digital systems. As more players show up, that function becomes more and more critical. It’s the infrastructure holding it all together. Here’s the bottom line: Private chains give banks the confidentiality they need. The XRP mainnet gives them a way to connect. You can’t really scale global finance on blockchain without both parts working in sync.

Jake Claver, QFOP

94,497 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Hashgraph x ioBuilders ⚡️️The Institutional Operating System for Tokenized Finance is Here "If you need to tokenize at scale, you have no reason to not engage us. That value proposition doesn't exist anywhere else." - Eric Piscini, CEO of Hashgraph Hedera mainnet and HashSphere private environments are now accessible via Asseto, the most powerful tokenization stack in institutional finance: • Issuance, lifecycle, trading, settlement • Lending platform launch with top institutions • HashSphere x Hedera x Cross-ledger protocol "The asset should never have to leave the system it was born in. You have issuance, lifecycle, trading, settlement, one platform, one data model, one audit trail." - Carlos Matilla, CEO of ioBuilders Hedera technology can cover every part of the institutional stack. Now, with Asseto, institutions have that combined power at their fingertips. Generation Infinity | iobuilders | Hashgraph Full Interview:
31:47

Hashgraph x ioBuilders ⚡️️The Institutional Operating System for Tokenized Finance is Here "If you need to tokenize at scale, you have no reason to not engage us. That value proposition doesn't exist anywhere else." - Eric Piscini, CEO of Hashgraph Hedera mainnet and HashSphere private environments are now accessible via Asseto, the most powerful tokenization stack in institutional finance: • Issuance, lifecycle, trading, settlement • Lending platform launch with top institutions • HashSphere x Hedera x Cross-ledger protocol "The asset should never have to leave the system it was born in. You have issuance, lifecycle, trading, settlement, one platform, one data model, one audit trail." - Carlos Matilla, CEO of ioBuilders Hedera technology can cover every part of the institutional stack. Now, with Asseto, institutions have that combined power at their fingertips. Generation Infinity | iobuilders | Hashgraph Full Interview:

Generation Infinity

15,940 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Hedera just bought their biggest competitor... A silent multi-million dollar acquisition went down behind closed doors, changing the blockchain landscape forever. The Hadera Governing Council has purchased the intellectual property of its largest permissioned competitor, Hyperledger Fabric, from the Linux Foundation. This calculated structural chess move is designed to funnel the world's largest corporate supply chains, banks, and logistics networks onto a single public consensus service. Within hours of the announcement, sophisticated trading algorithms responded instantly, triggering a sharp bounce off the eight and a half cent support level and sending futures volumes skyrocketing by 242%. The corporate world loves blockchain technology but despises public ledgers where proprietary data is viewable by competitors. For years, Hyperledger Fabric was the king of this hidden ecosystem, allowing massive syndicates to build private networks. However, these isolated networks lacked a public consensus mechanism. This new integration allows private networks to operate behind closed doors while periodically flushing a cryptographic hash of transaction histories to the public ledger. Make sure to subscribe for more in depth crypto breakdowns as we track this transition from theoretical utility to absolute corporate capture. #CryptoNews #HBAR #Hyperledger
17:59

Hedera just bought their biggest competitor... A silent multi-million dollar acquisition went down behind closed doors, changing the blockchain landscape forever. The Hadera Governing Council has purchased the intellectual property of its largest permissioned competitor, Hyperledger Fabric, from the Linux Foundation. This calculated structural chess move is designed to funnel the world's largest corporate supply chains, banks, and logistics networks onto a single public consensus service. Within hours of the announcement, sophisticated trading algorithms responded instantly, triggering a sharp bounce off the eight and a half cent support level and sending futures volumes skyrocketing by 242%. The corporate world loves blockchain technology but despises public ledgers where proprietary data is viewable by competitors. For years, Hyperledger Fabric was the king of this hidden ecosystem, allowing massive syndicates to build private networks. However, these isolated networks lacked a public consensus mechanism. This new integration allows private networks to operate behind closed doors while periodically flushing a cryptographic hash of transaction histories to the public ledger. Make sure to subscribe for more in depth crypto breakdowns as we track this transition from theoretical utility to absolute corporate capture. #CryptoNews #HBAR #Hyperledger

Cheeky Crypto

20,327 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🔥🔥🔥 The recent OCC statement is financial history in the making! What’s written there validates so much of what we’ve been analysing about Stronghold, and even about networks like Stellar and Ripple. For the first time, the US regulator states plainly, banks can hold crypto on their balance sheet, pay network fees, and operate directly on blockchains as a normal part of banking activity. I’m not sure everyone fully grasps the scale of this 😅 Banks not only can, they MUST be connected to different ledgers whenever those networks form part of permissible banking activities. The regulator describes DLTs as “new ways of conducting the very old business of banking”, and that says everything. It means blockchains are no longer a technological experiment; they’re being treated as natural extensions of the financial system. The document goes even further by stating that a bank may be unable to perform certain functions if it lacks the capacity to operate on these networks. If the payment, settlement, swap, or record is happening on a specific ledger, the bank needs to be there and it needs to operate using the native token, because that’s how fees are paid, transactions are validated, and consensus is reached. For the OCC, this is simply part of how a modern bank should function. And because each ledger works under its own rules — Ethereum with gas, Stellar with path payments, Ripple with ODL — the OCC explicitly acknowledges that banks will need to hold small amounts of multiple crypto-assets whenever this supports permitted activities. To test platforms, settle movements, reconcile internal wallets, execute client instructions… all of it requires presence on the networks and tokens to operate. This vision opens the door to something far bigger, a financial system where banks are connected to several DLTs simultaneously, each one serving a different purpose. Liquidity, messaging, FX, settlement. And if banks need to be on these networks, they also need the layers that link them together, translate data, maintain compliance, and ensure all of this can coexist with traditional standards. This is where the entire ecosystem of utility tokens and interoperable networks takes on renewed importance. 🔥 HUUUGE! 🔥 🧠 Know what you hold! $SHx $XLM $XRP #DigitalAssets #ISO20022 #Crypto #RWA
3:13

🔥🔥🔥 The recent OCC statement is financial history in the making! What’s written there validates so much of what we’ve been analysing about Stronghold, and even about networks like Stellar and Ripple. For the first time, the US regulator states plainly, banks can hold crypto on their balance sheet, pay network fees, and operate directly on blockchains as a normal part of banking activity. I’m not sure everyone fully grasps the scale of this 😅 Banks not only can, they MUST be connected to different ledgers whenever those networks form part of permissible banking activities. The regulator describes DLTs as “new ways of conducting the very old business of banking”, and that says everything. It means blockchains are no longer a technological experiment; they’re being treated as natural extensions of the financial system. The document goes even further by stating that a bank may be unable to perform certain functions if it lacks the capacity to operate on these networks. If the payment, settlement, swap, or record is happening on a specific ledger, the bank needs to be there and it needs to operate using the native token, because that’s how fees are paid, transactions are validated, and consensus is reached. For the OCC, this is simply part of how a modern bank should function. And because each ledger works under its own rules — Ethereum with gas, Stellar with path payments, Ripple with ODL — the OCC explicitly acknowledges that banks will need to hold small amounts of multiple crypto-assets whenever this supports permitted activities. To test platforms, settle movements, reconcile internal wallets, execute client instructions… all of it requires presence on the networks and tokens to operate. This vision opens the door to something far bigger, a financial system where banks are connected to several DLTs simultaneously, each one serving a different purpose. Liquidity, messaging, FX, settlement. And if banks need to be on these networks, they also need the layers that link them together, translate data, maintain compliance, and ensure all of this can coexist with traditional standards. This is where the entire ecosystem of utility tokens and interoperable networks takes on renewed importance. 🔥 HUUUGE! 🔥 🧠 Know what you hold! $SHx $XLM $XRP #DigitalAssets #ISO20022 #Crypto #RWA

StrongSHx

28,507 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

⚡️ The Institutes RiskStream Collaborative, the property and casualty insurance industry's largest not-for-profit emerging technology consortium, has joined the Hedera Council as a strategic partner. The move builds on RiskStream's existing work with Hashgraph tokenizing property risk data across Hedera and HashSphere. RiskStream represents over 30 carrier, broker, and reinsurer members and operates within an industry that wrote more than $1.1 trillion in direct written premium in 2025. The group is building a property risk and resilience portal that assigns commercial and residential properties a persistent public token on Hedera, while sensitive construction, occupancy, protection, and exposure data is exchanged on the permissioned HashSphere ledger. The project is currently moving from proof of concept into a pilot phase with carriers and brokers, with plans to bring on data providers next. The same asset tokenization framework can be reused for other insurable assets across additional lines of insurance, for example, auto, aerospace, and surety bonds. Full interview with Pat Schmid, President of The Institutes RiskStream Collaborative:
22:51

⚡️ The Institutes RiskStream Collaborative, the property and casualty insurance industry's largest not-for-profit emerging technology consortium, has joined the Hedera Council as a strategic partner. The move builds on RiskStream's existing work with Hashgraph tokenizing property risk data across Hedera and HashSphere. RiskStream represents over 30 carrier, broker, and reinsurer members and operates within an industry that wrote more than $1.1 trillion in direct written premium in 2025. The group is building a property risk and resilience portal that assigns commercial and residential properties a persistent public token on Hedera, while sensitive construction, occupancy, protection, and exposure data is exchanged on the permissioned HashSphere ledger. The project is currently moving from proof of concept into a pilot phase with carriers and brokers, with plans to bring on data providers next. The same asset tokenization framework can be reused for other insurable assets across additional lines of insurance, for example, auto, aerospace, and surety bonds. Full interview with Pat Schmid, President of The Institutes RiskStream Collaborative:

Generation Infinity

34,281 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Every Wall Street giant that owns an AI data center is suddenly looking for a buyer. And NONE of them want to be the last one holding it. Three of them made their move in the last two weeks: Vantage Data Centers is exploring an exit. Its owners, Silver Lake and DigitalBridge, are weighing a listing at around $100 billion, or a sale, or a stake sale. It would be the largest data center IPO ever done. Three days earlier, CyrusOne started the same process. KKR and Global Infrastructure Partners met Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and the banks pitched for roles on a listing that could come as early as 2027. Last month, Switch hired Goldman and JPMorgan to take it public at close to $80 billion including debt, possibly by the fourth quarter. Three different companies moved inside the same 14 days, and the same handful of investment banks took every call. And these are the exact same firms that BOUGHT these companies off the public market four years ago. Between June 2021 and early 2022, private equity took the data center industry private. Blackstone bought QTS. KKR and Global Infrastructure Partners took CyrusOne private in a deal worth about $15 billion. DigitalBridge and IFM took Switch private for about $11 billion. Together those deals ran past $35 billion. By 2023 there were only two pure-play data center companies left on the public market. The logic at the time was that data centers burn cash for years before they pay, and public shareholders hate that. But private money was patient, and private money could wait. Four years later, the AI boom arrived and every one of those buildings became a gold mine. So follow this: Switch went private at about $11 billion in 2022. Its owners now want close to $80 billion for it. That is roughly 7x, in four years, on the same buildings. And DigitalBridge sits on both sides of this. It owns a piece of Vantage and it took Switch private. It is now looking for the door on BOTH. The question now is who is supposed to buy. There is no bigger private buyer left to sell to. These are already the largest infrastructure funds on Earth, and the price tags now run to $100 billion. The only pocket deep enough is the public market, which means anyone with a brokerage account or an index fund. The people who bought low from the public are now organizing to sell high back to the public. And they are doing it while telling everyone the buildout is just getting started. KKR raised a record $19.2 billion for its newest infrastructure fund this month, and in June launched a separate company with over $10 billion committed to finance more construction. So one hand raises fresh billions to build more data centers, and the other hand sells the finished ones to whoever will take them. None of this proves anyone thinks the boom is ending. Selling into strength is what these firms are paid to do, and every one of these deals is early stage and might never happen. But the timing tells you something: The most sophisticated infrastructure investors alive spent four years accumulating these assets in private, and all decided in the same two weeks that now is the moment to find someone else to own them. Four years ago these firms decided the public market was too impatient to own data centers. Now they want the public market to own them again, at 7x the price. Quite suspicious.
1:52

Every Wall Street giant that owns an AI data center is suddenly looking for a buyer. And NONE of them want to be the last one holding it. Three of them made their move in the last two weeks: Vantage Data Centers is exploring an exit. Its owners, Silver Lake and DigitalBridge, are weighing a listing at around $100 billion, or a sale, or a stake sale. It would be the largest data center IPO ever done. Three days earlier, CyrusOne started the same process. KKR and Global Infrastructure Partners met Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and the banks pitched for roles on a listing that could come as early as 2027. Last month, Switch hired Goldman and JPMorgan to take it public at close to $80 billion including debt, possibly by the fourth quarter. Three different companies moved inside the same 14 days, and the same handful of investment banks took every call. And these are the exact same firms that BOUGHT these companies off the public market four years ago. Between June 2021 and early 2022, private equity took the data center industry private. Blackstone bought QTS. KKR and Global Infrastructure Partners took CyrusOne private in a deal worth about $15 billion. DigitalBridge and IFM took Switch private for about $11 billion. Together those deals ran past $35 billion. By 2023 there were only two pure-play data center companies left on the public market. The logic at the time was that data centers burn cash for years before they pay, and public shareholders hate that. But private money was patient, and private money could wait. Four years later, the AI boom arrived and every one of those buildings became a gold mine. So follow this: Switch went private at about $11 billion in 2022. Its owners now want close to $80 billion for it. That is roughly 7x, in four years, on the same buildings. And DigitalBridge sits on both sides of this. It owns a piece of Vantage and it took Switch private. It is now looking for the door on BOTH. The question now is who is supposed to buy. There is no bigger private buyer left to sell to. These are already the largest infrastructure funds on Earth, and the price tags now run to $100 billion. The only pocket deep enough is the public market, which means anyone with a brokerage account or an index fund. The people who bought low from the public are now organizing to sell high back to the public. And they are doing it while telling everyone the buildout is just getting started. KKR raised a record $19.2 billion for its newest infrastructure fund this month, and in June launched a separate company with over $10 billion committed to finance more construction. So one hand raises fresh billions to build more data centers, and the other hand sells the finished ones to whoever will take them. None of this proves anyone thinks the boom is ending. Selling into strength is what these firms are paid to do, and every one of these deals is early stage and might never happen. But the timing tells you something: The most sophisticated infrastructure investors alive spent four years accumulating these assets in private, and all decided in the same two weeks that now is the moment to find someone else to own them. Four years ago these firms decided the public market was too impatient to own data centers. Now they want the public market to own them again, at 7x the price. Quite suspicious.

Ricardo

71,544 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 CRITICAL HBAR PRICE ALERT!! 🚨 In mid 2025, WISeKey will be connecting SEVEN TRILLION devices to their IOT Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Network. Additional satellites are launching in January 2025 via WISeKey's launch partner, SpaceX SEVEN TRILLION connected devices will use the Hedera Network. (think of the TPS paid in HBAR) SEALCOIN (by WISeKey) utilizes various Hedera services like the Hedera Smart Contract Service (HSCS), Hedera Token Service (HTS), and Hedera Consensus Service (HCS) to facilitate decentralized, intermediary-free transactions among IoT devices. This setup is intended to enhance the efficiency, security, and reliability of IoT ecosystems. This without doubt is the biggest ever news and use case ever contemplated for Hedera and explains why we are seeing an ETF application fast tracked, and price action on the HBAR token going ballistic. Watch this video and listen very, very closely to the details offered. After you watch it, watch it again. This is no exaggeration, this is the biggest news for Hedera in its 5 year life. QUOTE: "Backed by over 25 years of experience in cybersecurity and secure semiconductor chips, embedded firmware, and trusted hardware provisioning services, SEALCOIN AG, the WISeKey subsidiary housing the SEALCOIN project, is establishing itself as a trusted partner in safeguarding digital assets. SEALCOIN AG was formed in collaboration with The Hashgraph Group AG, and is poised to revolutionize decentralized services and IoT markets. SEALCOIN’s advanced technology embedded within a semiconductor device to validate and verify transactions autonomously. At the heart of this innovation is the Secure Element, an embedded security hardware that protects the private key and certificate representing the device’s unique identity. Leveraging elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) compatible with Hedera’s Decentralized Ledger Technology (DLT), the device can simultaneously authenticate and sign transactions on-chain." $HBAR #HBAR #Hashgraph #Hedera kat stratford Elon Musk Donald J. Trump #MAGA #USA Hedera The HBAR Bull | ℏ/acc
4:13

🚨 CRITICAL HBAR PRICE ALERT!! 🚨 In mid 2025, WISeKey will be connecting SEVEN TRILLION devices to their IOT Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Network. Additional satellites are launching in January 2025 via WISeKey's launch partner, SpaceX SEVEN TRILLION connected devices will use the Hedera Network. (think of the TPS paid in HBAR) SEALCOIN (by WISeKey) utilizes various Hedera services like the Hedera Smart Contract Service (HSCS), Hedera Token Service (HTS), and Hedera Consensus Service (HCS) to facilitate decentralized, intermediary-free transactions among IoT devices. This setup is intended to enhance the efficiency, security, and reliability of IoT ecosystems. This without doubt is the biggest ever news and use case ever contemplated for Hedera and explains why we are seeing an ETF application fast tracked, and price action on the HBAR token going ballistic. Watch this video and listen very, very closely to the details offered. After you watch it, watch it again. This is no exaggeration, this is the biggest news for Hedera in its 5 year life. QUOTE: "Backed by over 25 years of experience in cybersecurity and secure semiconductor chips, embedded firmware, and trusted hardware provisioning services, SEALCOIN AG, the WISeKey subsidiary housing the SEALCOIN project, is establishing itself as a trusted partner in safeguarding digital assets. SEALCOIN AG was formed in collaboration with The Hashgraph Group AG, and is poised to revolutionize decentralized services and IoT markets. SEALCOIN’s advanced technology embedded within a semiconductor device to validate and verify transactions autonomously. At the heart of this innovation is the Secure Element, an embedded security hardware that protects the private key and certificate representing the device’s unique identity. Leveraging elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) compatible with Hedera’s Decentralized Ledger Technology (DLT), the device can simultaneously authenticate and sign transactions on-chain." $HBAR #HBAR #Hashgraph #Hedera kat stratford Elon Musk Donald J. Trump #MAGA #USA Hedera The HBAR Bull | ℏ/acc

Crypto Observer

11,743 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The 2008 financial crisis led to the creation of Bitcoin because toxic assets were created by a poorly managed financial system that left society with the costs. We have an opportunity to build a better financial system that is cryptographically guaranteed, transparent, and gives control of risk over to the parties that it affects most. Our work on Chainlink and CCIP seeks to accelerate the speed at which this world happens on-chain. From secure data delivery to decentralized compute and now cross-chain interoperability, Chainlink is protecting dApps and their end users to deliver the true value of smart contracts and DeFi: a fair, transparent and largely derisked global financial system. As CCIP becomes the most widely used connectivity standard, we will initially see two largely separate on-chain networks of value: one for institutional/bank chains and the existing public blockchain DeFi ecosystem. CCIP will eventually merge these two large ecosystems into a single on-chain financial system that secures the world’s value on the Internet of Contracts. Presentation: Slides:
2:46

The 2008 financial crisis led to the creation of Bitcoin because toxic assets were created by a poorly managed financial system that left society with the costs. We have an opportunity to build a better financial system that is cryptographically guaranteed, transparent, and gives control of risk over to the parties that it affects most. Our work on Chainlink and CCIP seeks to accelerate the speed at which this world happens on-chain. From secure data delivery to decentralized compute and now cross-chain interoperability, Chainlink is protecting dApps and their end users to deliver the true value of smart contracts and DeFi: a fair, transparent and largely derisked global financial system. As CCIP becomes the most widely used connectivity standard, we will initially see two largely separate on-chain networks of value: one for institutional/bank chains and the existing public blockchain DeFi ecosystem. CCIP will eventually merge these two large ecosystems into a single on-chain financial system that secures the world’s value on the Internet of Contracts. Presentation: Slides:

Sergey Nazarov

181,997 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

SWIFT is building something much bigger than another payment upgrade. The deeper I look at where this is going, the more bullish I get on $HBAR, $LINK and $XRP. Go back to what Alisa DiCaprio said at HederaCon 2025. Stablecoins were exploding. New financial instruments were multiplying. Banks were going to face more networks, more forms of money and more complexity. Her concern was simple: How do you keep value flowing when finance becomes this fragmented? Fast-forward to 2026 and SWIFT is literally building around that problem. Its blockchain-based shared ledger is now ready for initial use, with 17 banks across six continents preparing tokenized-deposit transactions: ANZ, BNP Paribas, BNY, Citi, DBS, First Abu Dhabi Bank, FirstRand, HSBC, Itaú Unibanco, Lloyds, Mashreq, MUFG, OCBC, Standard Chartered, UBS, UOB and Wells Fargo. SWIFT already connects more than 11,500 banking and securities organizations across 200+ countries and territories. So imagine those institutions gradually moving from normal bank deposits into tokenized deposits that can settle 24/7. One bank has digital dollars. Another has digital euros. Another has digital yen. Then add stablecoins, tokenized securities, private ledgers and public blockchains. Suddenly the hard part is no longer creating digital assets. It is connecting them and finding liquidity between them. This is where I see three very different roles. $LINK Chainlink has the clearest direct SWIFT connection. SWIFT already tested Chainlink as an enterprise abstraction layer and used CCIP for blockchain interoperability. SWIFT, UBS Asset Management and Chainlink also demonstrated tokenized fund subscriptions and redemptions connecting digital assets with traditional fiat payment rails. Chainlink later won SWIFT’s 2025 interoperability-focused Hackathon challenge. And now DTCC is using Chainlink Runtime Environment and Chainlink’s data standard for its Collateral AppChain, expected to go live in Q4 2026. This is not just “oracle” territory anymore. It is the plumbing between financial networks. $HBAR Hedera attacks another layer. Shinhan Bank, Standard Bank and SCB TechX already tested multi-currency stablecoin remittances using Hedera, with settlement taking roughly 3–5 seconds. Then Australian Payments Plus, whose Rob Allen moderated DiCaprio’s HederaCon panel with Ahmed Zifzaf and Sushil Prabhu, used its private Hedera-based HashSphere in the Reserve Bank of Australia’s Project Acacia wholesale central-bank money pilot. Hedera also participated in the Bank of England and BIS Innovation Hub DLT Innovation Challenge. So if institutions need somewhere to issue and settle regulated digital assets, Hedera already has a serious seat at that table. And Chainlink CCIP is already live on Hedera mainnet. Then there is $XRP. Technical connectivity does not automatically create FX liquidity. Someone still has to exchange one currency for another. XRPL already has cross-currency payments, an onchain DEX, atomic settlement, Permissioned DEXes and XRP auto-bridging. Ripple and Bitso are already bringing MXNB and RLUSD into XRPL’s institutional liquidity environment. Conceptually: MXNB → XRP → RLUSD if XRP provides the best route. That is why I don’t see this as HBAR vs LINK vs XRP. I see a future where: Hedera can host regulated value. Chainlink can connect the networks. XRP can help connect the liquidity between currencies. DiCaprio warned that fragmentation would become the problem. Eighteen months later, global finance is already building the answer. How many people are still valuing $HBAR, $LINK and $XRP like none of this is happening?
1:15

SWIFT is building something much bigger than another payment upgrade. The deeper I look at where this is going, the more bullish I get on $HBAR, $LINK and $XRP. Go back to what Alisa DiCaprio said at HederaCon 2025. Stablecoins were exploding. New financial instruments were multiplying. Banks were going to face more networks, more forms of money and more complexity. Her concern was simple: How do you keep value flowing when finance becomes this fragmented? Fast-forward to 2026 and SWIFT is literally building around that problem. Its blockchain-based shared ledger is now ready for initial use, with 17 banks across six continents preparing tokenized-deposit transactions: ANZ, BNP Paribas, BNY, Citi, DBS, First Abu Dhabi Bank, FirstRand, HSBC, Itaú Unibanco, Lloyds, Mashreq, MUFG, OCBC, Standard Chartered, UBS, UOB and Wells Fargo. SWIFT already connects more than 11,500 banking and securities organizations across 200+ countries and territories. So imagine those institutions gradually moving from normal bank deposits into tokenized deposits that can settle 24/7. One bank has digital dollars. Another has digital euros. Another has digital yen. Then add stablecoins, tokenized securities, private ledgers and public blockchains. Suddenly the hard part is no longer creating digital assets. It is connecting them and finding liquidity between them. This is where I see three very different roles. $LINK Chainlink has the clearest direct SWIFT connection. SWIFT already tested Chainlink as an enterprise abstraction layer and used CCIP for blockchain interoperability. SWIFT, UBS Asset Management and Chainlink also demonstrated tokenized fund subscriptions and redemptions connecting digital assets with traditional fiat payment rails. Chainlink later won SWIFT’s 2025 interoperability-focused Hackathon challenge. And now DTCC is using Chainlink Runtime Environment and Chainlink’s data standard for its Collateral AppChain, expected to go live in Q4 2026. This is not just “oracle” territory anymore. It is the plumbing between financial networks. $HBAR Hedera attacks another layer. Shinhan Bank, Standard Bank and SCB TechX already tested multi-currency stablecoin remittances using Hedera, with settlement taking roughly 3–5 seconds. Then Australian Payments Plus, whose Rob Allen moderated DiCaprio’s HederaCon panel with Ahmed Zifzaf and Sushil Prabhu, used its private Hedera-based HashSphere in the Reserve Bank of Australia’s Project Acacia wholesale central-bank money pilot. Hedera also participated in the Bank of England and BIS Innovation Hub DLT Innovation Challenge. So if institutions need somewhere to issue and settle regulated digital assets, Hedera already has a serious seat at that table. And Chainlink CCIP is already live on Hedera mainnet. Then there is $XRP. Technical connectivity does not automatically create FX liquidity. Someone still has to exchange one currency for another. XRPL already has cross-currency payments, an onchain DEX, atomic settlement, Permissioned DEXes and XRP auto-bridging. Ripple and Bitso are already bringing MXNB and RLUSD into XRPL’s institutional liquidity environment. Conceptually: MXNB → XRP → RLUSD if XRP provides the best route. That is why I don’t see this as HBAR vs LINK vs XRP. I see a future where: Hedera can host regulated value. Chainlink can connect the networks. XRP can help connect the liquidity between currencies. DiCaprio warned that fragmentation would become the problem. Eighteen months later, global finance is already building the answer. How many people are still valuing $HBAR, $LINK and $XRP like none of this is happening?

X Finance Bull

370,739 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

🌐 Swarm on Hedera | Regulated RWA Infrastructure at Institutional Scale In this Genfinity interview, Swarm outlines how it is using Hedera to tokenize regulated stocks and bonds under compliant frameworks, bridging traditional financial markets with on-chain settlement. The conversation centers on Swarm’s announced acquisition by Invenium, a firm focused on authenticated, high-veracity data for private assets. Together, the platforms combine tokenization infrastructure with asset identity and compliance, supporting both public and private market use cases. Swarm confirms its continued build on Hedera, with the ecosystem benefiting from expanded integrations, additional assets, and deeper connections into financial markets. Private markets are highlighted as an area where verified asset data is critical and where on-chain infrastructure can improve existing processes. The focus is not on speed or speculation, but on regulatory alignment, asset authenticity, and scalability across jurisdictions. Podcast Powered by HashPack Wallet Hashgraph
27:10

🌐 Swarm on Hedera | Regulated RWA Infrastructure at Institutional Scale In this Genfinity interview, Swarm outlines how it is using Hedera to tokenize regulated stocks and bonds under compliant frameworks, bridging traditional financial markets with on-chain settlement. The conversation centers on Swarm’s announced acquisition by Invenium, a firm focused on authenticated, high-veracity data for private assets. Together, the platforms combine tokenization infrastructure with asset identity and compliance, supporting both public and private market use cases. Swarm confirms its continued build on Hedera, with the ecosystem benefiting from expanded integrations, additional assets, and deeper connections into financial markets. Private markets are highlighted as an area where verified asset data is critical and where on-chain infrastructure can improve existing processes. The focus is not on speed or speculation, but on regulatory alignment, asset authenticity, and scalability across jurisdictions. Podcast Powered by HashPack Wallet Hashgraph

Generation Infinity

95,599 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

One of Chainlink's core value props is that it is a neutral technology platform that does not compete with its customers Specifically, Chainlink is not a blockchain, and does not compete with blockchains Rather, Chainlink enhances the utility of all public/private chains by providing the oracle services their ecosystems need to succeed long-term This neutrality is why Chainlink has *thousands* of blockchain, Web3, and TradFi partners who rely on Chainlink for critical functionalities including: - Onchain data delivery - Cross-chain interoperability - Automated compliance - Privacy-preserving compute - Legacy system integration - Multi-system workflow orchestration As the cost and friction of launching a blockchain continues to drop toward zero, the number of public/private chains that exist will expand from hundreds today to thousands in the future If a cross-chain provider wants to pivot by launching their own blockchain and begin competing with Ethereum, Solana, Canton, and all of their existing blockchain partners, I wish them luck on that That’s not the game Chainlink is playing While blockchains fiercely compete amongst each other to become the transactional database layer, Chainlink wins regardless of which chains are used For Chainlink, every new blockchain introduced to the market is all the more justification for why organizations need Chainlink as their orchestration layer to manage the complexity That’s why financial market infrastructure providers like Swift, DTCC, Euroclear, and more have adopted Chainlink, they understand the financial system needs an orchestration layer To emphasize my point, here is a clip from DTCC executives explaining how the rapidly growing number of blockchains is why their partnership with Chainlink is so important
1:12

One of Chainlink's core value props is that it is a neutral technology platform that does not compete with its customers Specifically, Chainlink is not a blockchain, and does not compete with blockchains Rather, Chainlink enhances the utility of all public/private chains by providing the oracle services their ecosystems need to succeed long-term This neutrality is why Chainlink has *thousands* of blockchain, Web3, and TradFi partners who rely on Chainlink for critical functionalities including: - Onchain data delivery - Cross-chain interoperability - Automated compliance - Privacy-preserving compute - Legacy system integration - Multi-system workflow orchestration As the cost and friction of launching a blockchain continues to drop toward zero, the number of public/private chains that exist will expand from hundreds today to thousands in the future If a cross-chain provider wants to pivot by launching their own blockchain and begin competing with Ethereum, Solana, Canton, and all of their existing blockchain partners, I wish them luck on that That’s not the game Chainlink is playing While blockchains fiercely compete amongst each other to become the transactional database layer, Chainlink wins regardless of which chains are used For Chainlink, every new blockchain introduced to the market is all the more justification for why organizations need Chainlink as their orchestration layer to manage the complexity That’s why financial market infrastructure providers like Swift, DTCC, Euroclear, and more have adopted Chainlink, they understand the financial system needs an orchestration layer To emphasize my point, here is a clip from DTCC executives explaining how the rapidly growing number of blockchains is why their partnership with Chainlink is so important

Zach Rynes | CLG

13,328 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The storm has arrived. This is one of the most important days in crypto, blockchain and digital assets. 11,000 SWIFT institutions can now interoperate with any crypto network. Here's the proof: • SWIFT Blockchain: 17 banks live • 11,000 member network • Powered by Chainlink CCIP + CRE • No major infrastructure upgrades needed • Connects to any DLT, any asset "The SWIFT blockchain provides a single point of entry to multiple other distributed ledgers." • RLN and RSN are not XRP or XRPL. Proof is in the actual documents. U.S. Tokenized MMF trials. Massive. • 300+ participants, 120+ firms. Ripple. Canton. Stellar. All named. • BlackRock. JPM. Every major bank and FI. All in. Hedera is the main settlement ledger across all of these trials. • Only 3 networks used: HBAR, ETH, Besu • Fidelity + Federated Hermes on Hedera • JP Morgan + Fidelity: $10M on HBAR & ETH • HBAR to ETH for State Street tri-party DTCC 24/5 clearing live. $127T equities next. Internet of Value is here. Any asset. Any network. Level playing field. May the best assets and networks win. $LINK $HBAR $XRP $XLM $ETH $CC
30:08

The storm has arrived. This is one of the most important days in crypto, blockchain and digital assets. 11,000 SWIFT institutions can now interoperate with any crypto network. Here's the proof: • SWIFT Blockchain: 17 banks live • 11,000 member network • Powered by Chainlink CCIP + CRE • No major infrastructure upgrades needed • Connects to any DLT, any asset "The SWIFT blockchain provides a single point of entry to multiple other distributed ledgers." • RLN and RSN are not XRP or XRPL. Proof is in the actual documents. U.S. Tokenized MMF trials. Massive. • 300+ participants, 120+ firms. Ripple. Canton. Stellar. All named. • BlackRock. JPM. Every major bank and FI. All in. Hedera is the main settlement ledger across all of these trials. • Only 3 networks used: HBAR, ETH, Besu • Fidelity + Federated Hermes on Hedera • JP Morgan + Fidelity: $10M on HBAR & ETH • HBAR to ETH for State Street tri-party DTCC 24/5 clearing live. $127T equities next. Internet of Value is here. Any asset. Any network. Level playing field. May the best assets and networks win. $LINK $HBAR $XRP $XLM $ETH $CC

King Solomon (Ryan Solomon)

128,664 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Hey builders! The year is 2026 and the Internet is f*cked! No exaggeration. All parties in the trust ecosystem must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it. Although it was founded on the premise of human trust and communication between machines, it is now overrun by bots and non human actors working with more than half of Internet traffic now coming from these non human actors. The challenge that we now face is creating a global, interoperable framework of accountability so we can return trust to the Internet that we know and love, we can continue to enjoy the benefits that AI unlocks, and we can do so in a legally permissible, secure manner that does not endanger individual users, but rather opens new doors of efficiency and opportunity for them. However, there is a narrowing window for action. This is one of the most urgent challenges that faces technology at scale today. All parties in the trust ecosystem, nation states, platforms, developers, legal parties all must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it - with unverifiable data and non human actors. — Billions Network CEO Evin McMullen evin
1:21

Hey builders! The year is 2026 and the Internet is f*cked! No exaggeration. All parties in the trust ecosystem must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it. Although it was founded on the premise of human trust and communication between machines, it is now overrun by bots and non human actors working with more than half of Internet traffic now coming from these non human actors. The challenge that we now face is creating a global, interoperable framework of accountability so we can return trust to the Internet that we know and love, we can continue to enjoy the benefits that AI unlocks, and we can do so in a legally permissible, secure manner that does not endanger individual users, but rather opens new doors of efficiency and opportunity for them. However, there is a narrowing window for action. This is one of the most urgent challenges that faces technology at scale today. All parties in the trust ecosystem, nation states, platforms, developers, legal parties all must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it - with unverifiable data and non human actors. — Billions Network CEO Evin McMullen evin

Billions Network

30,538 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Cycles Pay is the first privacy-preserving crypto payment app for businesses. This is possible because of few specific design choices: First, the private keys stay on your mobile device. User actions are cryptographically signed by your private key before being submitted on-chain. The financial data is encrypted with that key and doesn’t leave your mobile device. Second, Cycles Pay uses a shielded pool to hide account balances on-chain. They are tracked as encrypted commitments and no one can see the underlying amounts or participants. Third, when you make a payment, a ZK proof is generated and verified on-chain to confirm the transaction is valid without revealing the amount or the counterparty. Users get blockchain integrity without exposing the transaction details.
0:52

Cycles Pay is the first privacy-preserving crypto payment app for businesses. This is possible because of few specific design choices: First, the private keys stay on your mobile device. User actions are cryptographically signed by your private key before being submitted on-chain. The financial data is encrypted with that key and doesn’t leave your mobile device. Second, Cycles Pay uses a shielded pool to hide account balances on-chain. They are tracked as encrypted commitments and no one can see the underlying amounts or participants. Third, when you make a payment, a ZK proof is generated and verified on-chain to confirm the transaction is valid without revealing the amount or the counterparty. Users get blockchain integrity without exposing the transaction details.

Cycles

13,648 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.
0:29

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.

Vet

39,554 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman
3:32

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman

XDC Foundation

14,619 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce