正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

What's wrong with Amendment 3? Everything. 🚭 Allows public smoking everywhere 🚨 Leaves law enforcement powerless 🧸 Permits deceptive marketing practices that target our kids 🤑 Enshrines corporate greed into the Florida Constitution Vote NO on Amendment 3.

137,638 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Blue Sky Basin 的头像
Blue Sky Basin1 年前

#YesOn3

Metamorphosis64 的头像
Metamorphosis641 年前

It’s amazing to me how many people that are voting no on this amendment are comparing marijuana to alcohol. There is no comparison. Alcohol is far worse and causes more problems than marijuana.

Melinda Johnson 的头像
Melinda Johnson1 年前

We have no smoking laws in place and they will NOT change just because it's marijuana and not tobacco. Law enforcement will NOT be powerless. Deceptive marketing will NOT be allowed. Marketing your product is perfectly legal. VOTE YES ON AMENDMENT 3.

Nelly 的头像
Nelly1 年前

No one cares about your lies anymore

Sunshine Cannabis 的头像
Sunshine Cannabis1 年前

Nobody believes your lies! There will be no public smoking, same as MMJ that is a fact. The adult use 21+ is amending article X it's the same set of laws nothing changes. #LegalizeIt #YesOn3

Melinda 的头像
Melinda1 年前

I’m voting yes. 🇺🇸

Cole Leep 的头像
Cole Leep1 年前

Negative. Cops Need no more power with marijuana. Toooo many arrests for a plant and big Pharma is at risks of losing money if it passes. We want weed not pills.

Harry Hood 的头像
Harry Hood1 年前

Phillip Morris is a donor to Vote No on 3. That’s all I need to know.

paul 的头像
paul1 年前

Everyone voting no are voting based on lies, pretty crazy.

Not a Democrat 的头像
Not a Democrat1 年前

Already voted Hell No on Amendment 3

相关视频

📌Closing all Doors for Chiwenga, LynneM 💕💝💎 and Cde Knox M Chivero could be right 🔸During the debate on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3), the Minister of Justice, Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi, explained that Clause 4 deletes Section 94(3) of the Constitution. That subsection used to require a Vice‑President who takes over as President after a vacancy to be sworn in with a new presidential oath. 🔸He pointed out that this requirement is no longer needed because Amendment No. 2 of 2021 already changed the rules: when the presidency becomes vacant, Parliament now elects a new President within 30 days. So the old oath requirement for a Vice‑President stepping up no longer applies. 🔸He stressed that removing this outdated provision simply brings the Constitution into line with the current law. Parliament has since passed the amendment. -—————————————————— ⭕️Key quotations from the Constitution and the amendment 1. The provision being repealed – Section 94(3) of the Constitution (still in force until Clause 4 of CAB3 takes effect): “A Vice‑President who becomes President on the death, resignation or removal from office of the President assumes office when he or she takes, before the Chief Justice or the next most senior judge available, the oath of President in the form set out in the Third Schedule, which oath he or she must take as soon as possible and in any event within forty‑eight hours after the office of President became vacant.” 2. The change made by Amendment No. 2 of 2021 – that Act removed the old system of elected Vice‑Presidents and introduced the current rules (including the 30‑day parliamentary election process for a new President). The amendment is cited as: “Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act, 2021” (The specific provisions that established the new vacancy‑filling procedure are found in the amendments to sections 92, 94 and 95 of the Constitution.) 3. Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi’s explanation (as summarised from his statement in Parliament): “Clause 4 repeals Section 94(3), which had required a Vice‑President assuming the Presidency after a vacancy to take the oath of office. This provision became redundant after Amendment No. 2 of 2021, which established that Parliament elects a new President within 30 days of a vacancy. The repeal ensures the Constitution reflects current law.” ——————————————————- 📌🃏In short: The old oath rule for a Vice‑President who becomes President is being scrapped because it’s been overtaken by the 2021 change that gives Parliament the power to elect a new President within 30 days. Clause 4 of CAB3 clears away that obsolete requirement.

Chimbwa

101,625 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen in, Vancouver, WA, was pulled over by FIVE police cars for legally observing and documenting ICE agents… then had to explain the Constitution to the officers detaining him… And it was all caught on video. In the video, an ICE agent didn’t like being watched, called local police… Then suddenly, the U.S. citizen, exercising his constitutional rights, was surrounded by FIVE cop cars. And most ridiculous part? The officers who claimed “reasonable suspicion” for detaining the U.S. citizen, could not even answer this simple question… Is it legal to observe and record law enforcement? After refusing to answer, and arguing about the First Amendment for several minutes, the officer finally admitted… Yes. It is legal to observe and record law enforcement. So, if it’s a legally protected activity… then why was this U.S. citizen detained? Federal courts, across the country, have repeatedly recognized that the First Amendment protects the right to record and observe government officials… including law enforcement performing their duties in public… as long as you aren’t interfering with them. That means, local police, and ICE agents, don’t get to decide when that right applies… They don’t get to ignore the Constitution because they’re uncomfortable with public oversight. But this isn’t the only incident. Across America, we’re watching local law enforcement work alongside ICE, while ordinary citizens, journalists, and legal observers are being questioned, detained, and intimidated for exercising their constitutional rights. And the fact that a U.S. citizen had to educate the officers, who were detaining HIM, about the Constitution… should outrage every single person. Because if the people enforcing the law don’t understand the constitutional rights they’re sworn to protect… That puts every American in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,571 次观看 • 3 个月前