Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

When governments pass vague hate laws, it’s not just extremists who are silenced. In the UK, people were arrested for silent prayer. In Australia, pastors investigated for sermons. In New Zealand, ordinary debate risks being labelled “hate.” This is what happens when governments pass vague hate laws. Canada already...

LeslynLewis's profile picture

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

178,100 subscribers

45,645 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Bill C-9 isn’t about fighting hate - it’s about giving Ottawa more power to silence our voices. Existing law already criminalizes genocide, hate propaganda, symbols, and vandalism (Sections 318, 319, 423, 430). C-9 removes Attorney General oversight, replaces objective “hatred” with a vague emotional test, and risks criminalizing dissent. This isn’t protection — it’s politicized power. Canadians need real protection — NOT laws that weaponize free speech. #cdnpoli
2:39

Bill C-9 isn’t about fighting hate - it’s about giving Ottawa more power to silence our voices. Existing law already criminalizes genocide, hate propaganda, symbols, and vandalism (Sections 318, 319, 423, 430). C-9 removes Attorney General oversight, replaces objective “hatred” with a vague emotional test, and risks criminalizing dissent. This isn’t protection — it’s politicized power. Canadians need real protection — NOT laws that weaponize free speech. #cdnpoli

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

109,474 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

When hate speech cases were already being addressed under existing laws, the need for a separate Hate Speech Bill raises serious questions. The Indian Constitution and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita already provide safeguards while guaranteeing the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a). The concern is not about protecting hatred, but about intent — is this law meant to protect a specific community, or to silence Hindutva voices? In a democracy, laws must restrain hate, not ideology or belief !
2:59

When hate speech cases were already being addressed under existing laws, the need for a separate Hate Speech Bill raises serious questions. The Indian Constitution and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita already provide safeguards while guaranteeing the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a). The concern is not about protecting hatred, but about intent — is this law meant to protect a specific community, or to silence Hindutva voices? In a democracy, laws must restrain hate, not ideology or belief !

Meenakshi Sehrawat

11,441 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Let’s be clear: Bill C-9, The Combatting Hate Act, is the anti-hate legislation that communities and law enforcement across Canada are asking for. Our government remains willing to work across the aisle to look for constructive improvements to this Bill. What we will not accept are endless delays and Conservative tactics designed to dodge a vote on this bill. I made a promise to my constituents to stand up for them and pass laws to fight back against hate immediately. Canadians want action- it’s time for Conservative members to get on board.
1:00

Let’s be clear: Bill C-9, The Combatting Hate Act, is the anti-hate legislation that communities and law enforcement across Canada are asking for. Our government remains willing to work across the aisle to look for constructive improvements to this Bill. What we will not accept are endless delays and Conservative tactics designed to dodge a vote on this bill. I made a promise to my constituents to stand up for them and pass laws to fight back against hate immediately. Canadians want action- it’s time for Conservative members to get on board.

Leslie Church 🇨🇦

117,736 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🇨🇦⚖️🤡 : Justice Minister Sean Fraser admits there are already numerous laws to deal with hate-based crimes but wants to pass another bill to protect Canadians against “hate”. A term Liberals will define and make numerous exemptions for. 🇬🇧🕌It will be used like we see in the UK to target people critical of the government and groups that prey on certain communities, like grooming gangs that target children. The 2 lesbian women attacked by a throng of Muslim men on the streets of Halifax was virtually ignored by the Liberals & NDP. The police arrested no one, despite the violent bloody assault being captured on video. The Muslim youth simply walked away from the police, with only one of the men providing ID. We didn’t need a “hate” bill to protect those women. We needed the police & justice system to act. We have real crimes being committed where the individuals doing the violent assaults are routinely released back into the community. Yesterday I posted about how 40 people in Vancouver were arrested 6,000 times in 1 year. Isn't that an act of hatred to society when people can openly break laws so freely and have no real consequence for it? We have witnessed the glorification of terrorism across Canada for years, including people chanting "Death to Canada", while praising terrorism in Vancouver and our government refused to prosecute those people. So it's flat out absurd to think this Bill is anything more than a targeted assault on free speech and average Canadians who demand accountability for actual hate crimes. Bill C-63 was promoted as protecting children. When the Liberals couldn't ram though their censorship bill based on that, they ditched even pretending it's about protecting kids. They are not trying to pass a bill to protect kids anymore, it's flat out about censorship. Remember Sean Fraser & the Liberals IMPORTED and promoted this hatred we see in Canada. They did it so they could pass laws that stifle real debate and criticism, like we see in the UK.
3:30

🇨🇦⚖️🤡 : Justice Minister Sean Fraser admits there are already numerous laws to deal with hate-based crimes but wants to pass another bill to protect Canadians against “hate”. A term Liberals will define and make numerous exemptions for. 🇬🇧🕌It will be used like we see in the UK to target people critical of the government and groups that prey on certain communities, like grooming gangs that target children. The 2 lesbian women attacked by a throng of Muslim men on the streets of Halifax was virtually ignored by the Liberals & NDP. The police arrested no one, despite the violent bloody assault being captured on video. The Muslim youth simply walked away from the police, with only one of the men providing ID. We didn’t need a “hate” bill to protect those women. We needed the police & justice system to act. We have real crimes being committed where the individuals doing the violent assaults are routinely released back into the community. Yesterday I posted about how 40 people in Vancouver were arrested 6,000 times in 1 year. Isn't that an act of hatred to society when people can openly break laws so freely and have no real consequence for it? We have witnessed the glorification of terrorism across Canada for years, including people chanting "Death to Canada", while praising terrorism in Vancouver and our government refused to prosecute those people. So it's flat out absurd to think this Bill is anything more than a targeted assault on free speech and average Canadians who demand accountability for actual hate crimes. Bill C-63 was promoted as protecting children. When the Liberals couldn't ram though their censorship bill based on that, they ditched even pretending it's about protecting kids. They are not trying to pass a bill to protect kids anymore, it's flat out about censorship. Remember Sean Fraser & the Liberals IMPORTED and promoted this hatred we see in Canada. They did it so they could pass laws that stifle real debate and criticism, like we see in the UK.

Bruce McGonigal

109,634 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!
2:16

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Praffulgarg

11,269 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🇨🇦⛪️🔥 : CPC MP Leslyn Lewis explains Bill C-9 (Anti Hate Bill) omits hate crimes against Christians. 🔥This despite over 100 arson attacks against churches, since 2021. 🙊She also correctly points out the bill could be used to crush political opinions that do not conform to political narratives promoted by extremely partisan governments. ⚖️She opposes C-9 because there are numerous laws on the books to combat the very crimes Liberals are trying to use as an excuse to pass the draconian, poorly defined "hatred" bill. 🙏I support Leslyn Lewis & voted for her as one of my choices for CPC leader because she routinely stands up for freedom & against the WHO & WEF deciding what is best for Canada! 📜C-9 is already into its second reading & could easily pass with very few NDP MPs voting in support of the Liberal Bill.
2:35

🇨🇦⛪️🔥 : CPC MP Leslyn Lewis explains Bill C-9 (Anti Hate Bill) omits hate crimes against Christians. 🔥This despite over 100 arson attacks against churches, since 2021. 🙊She also correctly points out the bill could be used to crush political opinions that do not conform to political narratives promoted by extremely partisan governments. ⚖️She opposes C-9 because there are numerous laws on the books to combat the very crimes Liberals are trying to use as an excuse to pass the draconian, poorly defined "hatred" bill. 🙏I support Leslyn Lewis & voted for her as one of my choices for CPC leader because she routinely stands up for freedom & against the WHO & WEF deciding what is best for Canada! 📜C-9 is already into its second reading & could easily pass with very few NDP MPs voting in support of the Liberal Bill.

Bruce McGonigal

124,060 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Censorship is not the solution. Albanese needs to deal with the failures of our immigration policy and intelligence agencies. Hate Crime laws were introduced into Parliament last year. The ones introduced this week will be just as ineffective. At the time I said they were unnecessary because State Governments deal with violent crimes. The new laws did nothing to stop the Bondi terror attack. As pointed out in the speech, the laws were designed to crack down psychological acts not violent acts. In particular the threshold for committing a crime was reduced from “intent” to “carelessness.” This makes the Hate Crime laws dangerous because they threaten freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. Last year, People First was one of a few parties that stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. If you would like to help push back against government overreach please sign up today at or
3:27

Censorship is not the solution. Albanese needs to deal with the failures of our immigration policy and intelligence agencies. Hate Crime laws were introduced into Parliament last year. The ones introduced this week will be just as ineffective. At the time I said they were unnecessary because State Governments deal with violent crimes. The new laws did nothing to stop the Bondi terror attack. As pointed out in the speech, the laws were designed to crack down psychological acts not violent acts. In particular the threshold for committing a crime was reduced from “intent” to “carelessness.” This makes the Hate Crime laws dangerous because they threaten freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. Last year, People First was one of a few parties that stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. If you would like to help push back against government overreach please sign up today at or

Gerard Rennick

26,393 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol
2:19

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

177,762 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Holocaust was a genocide based on Jewish blood, not belief. Even Jews who were secular or converted to Christianity were murdered under antisemitic regimes like Nazi Germany. Antisemitism has always treated Jews as a race, even when Jews did not define themselves that way. Antisemitism laws were created not to shield Judaism from theological criticism, but to prevent racial hate, incitement, and genocide. Islamophobia includes criticism of Islamic doctrines, political Islam, Sharia law, and jihad. Labeling this criticism as “racism” is a way to conflate legitimate scrutiny of ideas with hate. This approach erases the difference between attacking Muslims as people (which is wrong) and critiquing Islam as a political ideology (which must remain free and open). Antisemitism laws protect people, not theology. No one is being arrested for criticizing the Torah or disagreeing with Jewish views. The move to racialize Islam and pass “Islamophobia” laws isn’t about protecting people from harm, it’s about protecting an ideology from examination. That’s dangerous. It allows Islam to advance unchecked, shields oppressive ideas from being challenged, and weaponizes tolerance against open societies. It cheapens real anti-racism efforts, by making criticism of a powerful, global religion into a hate crime.
1:42

The Holocaust was a genocide based on Jewish blood, not belief. Even Jews who were secular or converted to Christianity were murdered under antisemitic regimes like Nazi Germany. Antisemitism has always treated Jews as a race, even when Jews did not define themselves that way. Antisemitism laws were created not to shield Judaism from theological criticism, but to prevent racial hate, incitement, and genocide. Islamophobia includes criticism of Islamic doctrines, political Islam, Sharia law, and jihad. Labeling this criticism as “racism” is a way to conflate legitimate scrutiny of ideas with hate. This approach erases the difference between attacking Muslims as people (which is wrong) and critiquing Islam as a political ideology (which must remain free and open). Antisemitism laws protect people, not theology. No one is being arrested for criticizing the Torah or disagreeing with Jewish views. The move to racialize Islam and pass “Islamophobia” laws isn’t about protecting people from harm, it’s about protecting an ideology from examination. That’s dangerous. It allows Islam to advance unchecked, shields oppressive ideas from being challenged, and weaponizes tolerance against open societies. It cheapens real anti-racism efforts, by making criticism of a powerful, global religion into a hate crime.

Dan Burmawi

30,883 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?
1:54

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?

Michael Shellenberger

826,856 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

While Canadians were at the lake, the Liberals rammed Bill C-22 through. 166 Liberals voted to shut down debate. Every other party voted no. They gave the committee 30 minutes. Thirty minutes to review a bill that rewrites Canada’s surveillance laws forever. Then they rubber-stamped it and left for summer break. Here’s what it does: Phone and internet providers must store metadata on every single Canadian for a full year. Who you contacted. When. From where. Not suspects. Everyone. Police say a year is “a good start.” Experts say it creates a chill because it’s for any purpose, any data. Signal and NordVPN have already said they may leave Canada over this. This is why they wanted a majority. So they can pass laws like this in the dark. The Senate looks at it September 21. There’s still time to fight it. #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst
3:02

While Canadians were at the lake, the Liberals rammed Bill C-22 through. 166 Liberals voted to shut down debate. Every other party voted no. They gave the committee 30 minutes. Thirty minutes to review a bill that rewrites Canada’s surveillance laws forever. Then they rubber-stamped it and left for summer break. Here’s what it does: Phone and internet providers must store metadata on every single Canadian for a full year. Who you contacted. When. From where. Not suspects. Everyone. Police say a year is “a good start.” Experts say it creates a chill because it’s for any purpose, any data. Signal and NordVPN have already said they may leave Canada over this. This is why they wanted a majority. So they can pass laws like this in the dark. The Senate looks at it September 21. There’s still time to fight it. #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

48,670 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

🚨BREAKING: Hundreds arrested in Parliament Square for peaceful protest against ban of Palestine Action When the Government is arresting people under terrorism laws for sitting peacefully in protest, something is going very wrong here in the UK. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror. Amnesty has long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad, vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. Today's response only further demonstrates that our concerns were justified. Any restriction on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly must be lawful, necessary and proportionate to achieving a legitimate aim. Criminalising speech in this context is only permitted when it incites violence or advocates hatred. Expressing support for Palestine Action does not, in itself, meet this threshold.
0:55

🚨BREAKING: Hundreds arrested in Parliament Square for peaceful protest against ban of Palestine Action When the Government is arresting people under terrorism laws for sitting peacefully in protest, something is going very wrong here in the UK. Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror. Amnesty has long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad, vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. Today's response only further demonstrates that our concerns were justified. Any restriction on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly must be lawful, necessary and proportionate to achieving a legitimate aim. Criminalising speech in this context is only permitted when it incites violence or advocates hatred. Expressing support for Palestine Action does not, in itself, meet this threshold.

Amnesty UK

455,782 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Former AFP Detective/ Senior Police officer David Craig has spoken out about Antiwhite discrimination in Australia’s Policing & in our Justice system. David warned that UK two tier Policing is already LEGALLY entrenched in Australia due to LABOR’S new “hate speech” laws pushed by the 🇮🇱 Lobby Groups. He says these laws are DANGEROUS White Australians. White Aussies are the only people not protected by these laws & we are the target of these laws. “The Victorian amendments to the hate speech laws mean that in exactly the same circumstances, there will be a different policing outcome depending on the race and culture of the people involved. That doesn’t sound like equality to me” These Antiwhite laws were forced onto Australian’s by Foreign 🇮🇱 Lobby groups which has created a lot of resentment from Aussies towards these groups. Australian’s have seen how much power these Foreign Lobby groups that represent 0.5% of our population have over all of us & our nation. Aussies never elected these Foreign Lobby groups to make policy decisions for Australian’s.
1:50

Former AFP Detective/ Senior Police officer David Craig has spoken out about Antiwhite discrimination in Australia’s Policing & in our Justice system. David warned that UK two tier Policing is already LEGALLY entrenched in Australia due to LABOR’S new “hate speech” laws pushed by the 🇮🇱 Lobby Groups. He says these laws are DANGEROUS White Australians. White Aussies are the only people not protected by these laws & we are the target of these laws. “The Victorian amendments to the hate speech laws mean that in exactly the same circumstances, there will be a different policing outcome depending on the race and culture of the people involved. That doesn’t sound like equality to me” These Antiwhite laws were forced onto Australian’s by Foreign 🇮🇱 Lobby groups which has created a lot of resentment from Aussies towards these groups. Australian’s have seen how much power these Foreign Lobby groups that represent 0.5% of our population have over all of us & our nation. Aussies never elected these Foreign Lobby groups to make policy decisions for Australian’s.

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

21,477 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Bill C-9 HAS PASSED – The Hate Speech TRAP Will SOON BE LAW In Canada! HERE’S HOW TO RESIST!! The so-called “Combating Hate Act” has officially passed and is heading for Royal Assent. They’ve removed the decades old “good faith religious expression” defence from the Criminal Code, leaving pastors, priests, and everyday Canadians completely exposed. No more protection for quoting scripture or expressing biblical beliefs on marriage, gender, immigration, or culture. Vague “hate” terms can now be weaponized against you with zero defences left. This isn’t about stopping real hate, it’s about control. The authoritarian trap is now law. In this urgent video report Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-9 does and why we must fight back immediately with mass non-compliance and zero self-censorship. If you value freedom of speech and freedom of religion, this is a must watch. Please share this far and wide!
7:48

Bill C-9 HAS PASSED – The Hate Speech TRAP Will SOON BE LAW In Canada! HERE’S HOW TO RESIST!! The so-called “Combating Hate Act” has officially passed and is heading for Royal Assent. They’ve removed the decades old “good faith religious expression” defence from the Criminal Code, leaving pastors, priests, and everyday Canadians completely exposed. No more protection for quoting scripture or expressing biblical beliefs on marriage, gender, immigration, or culture. Vague “hate” terms can now be weaponized against you with zero defences left. This isn’t about stopping real hate, it’s about control. The authoritarian trap is now law. In this urgent video report Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-9 does and why we must fight back immediately with mass non-compliance and zero self-censorship. If you value freedom of speech and freedom of religion, this is a must watch. Please share this far and wide!

Dan Dicks

45,791 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

YES! Must Watch... 'Is It Hate to Say That Africa Doesn’t Fit in Europe or That Spain Should Remain Spanish' – Vox Party’s Rocío de Meer “It’s a lie that they are refugees fleeing from wars,” Rocío de Meer stated. “What war is there in Algeria? What war is there in Morocco? What war is there in Mauritania?” “Is it hatred to demand that Spain prioritize its own citizens—the 13 million Spaniards at risk of poverty and social exclusion?” “Fear is what you sow in neighborhoods and villages, where people dare not step outside after 8 PM.” “Is it hatred to wonder where millions of new citizens are going to live, when our own young people cannot afford an apartment?” “Is it hate to say that we don’t want to see scenes of favelas or jihadist threats on our streets?” “Not fear of the different, but terror of the known: a socialist government willing to destroy everything Spaniards hold dear.” “You know it’s not hatred. You know it’s love. You know it’s respect. You know it’s decency. You know it’s patriotism. And you know it’s honoring the truth.” “This is not xenophobia. This is not hatred. This is reality—a reality the socialists have unleashed upon Spain.” Read my latest:
8:19

YES! Must Watch... 'Is It Hate to Say That Africa Doesn’t Fit in Europe or That Spain Should Remain Spanish' – Vox Party’s Rocío de Meer “It’s a lie that they are refugees fleeing from wars,” Rocío de Meer stated. “What war is there in Algeria? What war is there in Morocco? What war is there in Mauritania?” “Is it hatred to demand that Spain prioritize its own citizens—the 13 million Spaniards at risk of poverty and social exclusion?” “Fear is what you sow in neighborhoods and villages, where people dare not step outside after 8 PM.” “Is it hatred to wonder where millions of new citizens are going to live, when our own young people cannot afford an apartment?” “Is it hate to say that we don’t want to see scenes of favelas or jihadist threats on our streets?” “Not fear of the different, but terror of the known: a socialist government willing to destroy everything Spaniards hold dear.” “You know it’s not hatred. You know it’s love. You know it’s respect. You know it’s decency. You know it’s patriotism. And you know it’s honoring the truth.” “This is not xenophobia. This is not hatred. This is reality—a reality the socialists have unleashed upon Spain.” Read my latest:

Amy Mek

28,639 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The left is losing their minds over this new movie “Citizen Vigilante.” Why? Because it gives people the one idea they fear most: What happens when the government deliberately imports chaos, refuses to protect its own citizens, and the average person finally decides they’ve had enough? This isn’t some random action flick. It’s a reminder that when the state fails — when extortion rings run wild in our cities, when crime stats get buried, when politicians prioritize foreigners over Canadians — people reach a breaking point. The establishment hates anything that suggests citizens might stop waiting for permission to defend themselves. They want you passive. Compliant. “Own nothing and be happy.” Movies like this terrify them because they plant the seed that maybe the people still have a spine. Canada is already living the prequel. Calgary just dropped 15 mugshots in a 49-case extortion spree. Same story everywhere. The left doesn’t hate the movie because it’s violent. They hate it because it shows what happens when good people stop playing along with their destruction of the country. #cdnpoli #CitizenVigilante #LiberalFail #CrimeWave #CanadaFirst
1:12

The left is losing their minds over this new movie “Citizen Vigilante.” Why? Because it gives people the one idea they fear most: What happens when the government deliberately imports chaos, refuses to protect its own citizens, and the average person finally decides they’ve had enough? This isn’t some random action flick. It’s a reminder that when the state fails — when extortion rings run wild in our cities, when crime stats get buried, when politicians prioritize foreigners over Canadians — people reach a breaking point. The establishment hates anything that suggests citizens might stop waiting for permission to defend themselves. They want you passive. Compliant. “Own nothing and be happy.” Movies like this terrify them because they plant the seed that maybe the people still have a spine. Canada is already living the prequel. Calgary just dropped 15 mugshots in a 49-case extortion spree. Same story everywhere. The left doesn’t hate the movie because it’s violent. They hate it because it shows what happens when good people stop playing along with their destruction of the country. #cdnpoli #CitizenVigilante #LiberalFail #CrimeWave #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

86,843 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Lindsey German, "I'd like you to just look around at your neighbours here this afternoon on this demonstration." "I'd like you to look at the diversity — the different nationalities, the different religions that are here." "Then I would like to ask you whether you think this looks like a hate march, because we are the exact opposite of hate marchers." "Despite what has been said by the police, by Keir Starmer, by the politicians and by the media, everybody is here today because they oppose hate, they oppose war, they oppose genocide, they oppose what is being done to the people of Palestine." "And we are here today in solidarity with the people of Palestine, because it is still going on." "Gaza was bombed last night. Lebanon was bombed last night." "There is no ceasefire and no justice for the Palestinians." "And if you want to see what a real hate march looks like, just look over St James’s Park to Parliament Square." "That’s a hate march." "They hate Muslims, they hate people from abroad, they hate migrants, they hate women, they hate absolutely anybody who isn’t like them." "They are the real hate marchers." "And we are here today to take a stand in solidarity with the Palestinians, but also against any form of racism and fascism." "And one of the most shocking things about all this is the way the police have been criminalising our marches, the way they have been arresting people, the way they try to ban slogans, the way in which they say that people are not allowed to stand up for the Palestinians." "And I’ve got a message for Mark Rowley and the Metropolitan Police." "Do not start telling us what racism looks like." "We know what racism looks like, and we know it much better than the Metropolitan Police know what it looks like." "My final point is this." "Keir Starmer is toast." "He’s not going to last until the autumn, nor should he." "And one of the main reasons he’s toast is because of his foreign policy, because of his support for the genocide, because of all those sorts of deeds." "But do not think that whoever takes his place, they need to change their foreign policy." "We have a big political crisis in this country." "We do not want to have to pay for their crisis."
3:20

Lindsey German, "I'd like you to just look around at your neighbours here this afternoon on this demonstration." "I'd like you to look at the diversity — the different nationalities, the different religions that are here." "Then I would like to ask you whether you think this looks like a hate march, because we are the exact opposite of hate marchers." "Despite what has been said by the police, by Keir Starmer, by the politicians and by the media, everybody is here today because they oppose hate, they oppose war, they oppose genocide, they oppose what is being done to the people of Palestine." "And we are here today in solidarity with the people of Palestine, because it is still going on." "Gaza was bombed last night. Lebanon was bombed last night." "There is no ceasefire and no justice for the Palestinians." "And if you want to see what a real hate march looks like, just look over St James’s Park to Parliament Square." "That’s a hate march." "They hate Muslims, they hate people from abroad, they hate migrants, they hate women, they hate absolutely anybody who isn’t like them." "They are the real hate marchers." "And we are here today to take a stand in solidarity with the Palestinians, but also against any form of racism and fascism." "And one of the most shocking things about all this is the way the police have been criminalising our marches, the way they have been arresting people, the way they try to ban slogans, the way in which they say that people are not allowed to stand up for the Palestinians." "And I’ve got a message for Mark Rowley and the Metropolitan Police." "Do not start telling us what racism looks like." "We know what racism looks like, and we know it much better than the Metropolitan Police know what it looks like." "My final point is this." "Keir Starmer is toast." "He’s not going to last until the autumn, nor should he." "And one of the main reasons he’s toast is because of his foreign policy, because of his support for the genocide, because of all those sorts of deeds." "But do not think that whoever takes his place, they need to change their foreign policy." "We have a big political crisis in this country." "We do not want to have to pay for their crisis."

Farrukh

12,791 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A Boomer from Ontario skipped Canada Day completely. Came down to the U.S. two days early, stayed for the July 4th celebrations, and said straight up he’s here for the big party with President Trump. When asked why, he didn’t hesitate: “I love the freedom you have here. We have a lot of anti-free speech laws being implemented right now in Canada… they call them hate laws.” No apologies. No virtue signaling. Just a regular guy who still remembers what actual freedom feels like and isn’t afraid to say Canada is losing it. While the rest of the country gets lectured about “elbows up” and managed decline, this is the quiet part out loud — more and more Canadians are voting with their feet and their calendars. This guy gets it. The question is how many more feel the same way before Ottawa notices. #cdnpoli #July4th #Freedom #CanadaFirst #LiberalFail
0:43

A Boomer from Ontario skipped Canada Day completely. Came down to the U.S. two days early, stayed for the July 4th celebrations, and said straight up he’s here for the big party with President Trump. When asked why, he didn’t hesitate: “I love the freedom you have here. We have a lot of anti-free speech laws being implemented right now in Canada… they call them hate laws.” No apologies. No virtue signaling. Just a regular guy who still remembers what actual freedom feels like and isn’t afraid to say Canada is losing it. While the rest of the country gets lectured about “elbows up” and managed decline, this is the quiet part out loud — more and more Canadians are voting with their feet and their calendars. This guy gets it. The question is how many more feel the same way before Ottawa notices. #cdnpoli #July4th #Freedom #CanadaFirst #LiberalFail

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

118,192 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is getting insane 🤯 Government officials are now showing up at Canadians’ homes over social media posts from months or even years ago. This is happening after Bill C-9 — the Combatting Hate Act — which expands hate speech laws, creates new offences, increases penalties, and removes legal protections that used to exist. Meanwhile, real crime (break-ins, violent offences, repeat offenders being released the same day) keeps getting worse. But instead of dealing with actual criminals, they’re using new powers to go after people for what they said online. This is the exact kind of overreach we were warned about. It’s not about safety. It’s about control. If they ever knock on your door over an old post, record the interaction and contact the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. They’re already helping people in this situation. We’re not the UK. We shouldn’t be heading there either. This is George Orwell nonsense, and it’s happening here now. Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast ‘s Video says it all.
2:14

This is getting insane 🤯 Government officials are now showing up at Canadians’ homes over social media posts from months or even years ago. This is happening after Bill C-9 — the Combatting Hate Act — which expands hate speech laws, creates new offences, increases penalties, and removes legal protections that used to exist. Meanwhile, real crime (break-ins, violent offences, repeat offenders being released the same day) keeps getting worse. But instead of dealing with actual criminals, they’re using new powers to go after people for what they said online. This is the exact kind of overreach we were warned about. It’s not about safety. It’s about control. If they ever knock on your door over an old post, record the interaction and contact the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. They’re already helping people in this situation. We’re not the UK. We shouldn’t be heading there either. This is George Orwell nonsense, and it’s happening here now. Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast ‘s Video says it all.

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

40,158 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce