正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

When ICE agents enter a public space like a restaurant and are peacefully rejected by a community — jeered, shunned, or asked to leave — tells us that's lawful civic expression and protected speech under the U.S. Constitution.

Joe Walsh

494,628 subscribers

77,019 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A protester faces ICE agents and reads part of the U.S. Constitution

A protester faces ICE agents and reads part of the U.S. Constitution

Brendan Gutenschwager

33,996 次观看 • 10 个月前

Secretary Noem acknowledges ICE and CBP can't shoot Americans for peacefully protesting, videotaping ICE officers or lawfully carrying a firearm, and yet her agents are routinely violating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. There is a total leadership breakdown requiring immediate change.

Secretary Noem acknowledges ICE and CBP can't shoot Americans for peacefully protesting, videotaping ICE officers or lawfully carrying a firearm, and yet her agents are routinely violating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. There is a total leadership breakdown requiring immediate change.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

35,085 次观看 • 5 个月前

As a veteran, this man fully supports President Trump sending 2,000 National Guardsmen to LA to protect ICE agents. These protests are not peaceful or protected under the Constitution. The Supreme Court has made clear what qualifies as peaceful protest and violence, assaulting law enforcement, or obstructing federal agents are not protected actions! He stands 100% for Americans’ rights, but also for the powers granted to our government under the Constitution. What’s happening in LA is not a constitutional right, and he supports the use of military force if needed to ensure national security and uphold the law.

As a veteran, this man fully supports President Trump sending 2,000 National Guardsmen to LA to protect ICE agents. These protests are not peaceful or protected under the Constitution. The Supreme Court has made clear what qualifies as peaceful protest and violence, assaulting law enforcement, or obstructing federal agents are not protected actions! He stands 100% for Americans’ rights, but also for the powers granted to our government under the Constitution. What’s happening in LA is not a constitutional right, and he supports the use of military force if needed to ensure national security and uphold the law.

Sequencer

13,480 次观看 • 1 年前

No one voted for masked thugs to terrorize children at a preschool graduation. reminds us that ICE can usually enter areas open to the public, like a public parking lot or a sidewalk. But schools are not hunting grounds for masked government agents. Children have rights. Arm immigrants and allies with PAXIS:

No one voted for masked thugs to terrorize children at a preschool graduation. reminds us that ICE can usually enter areas open to the public, like a public parking lot or a sidewalk. But schools are not hunting grounds for masked government agents. Children have rights. Arm immigrants and allies with PAXIS:

Joe Walsh

13,556 次观看 • 1 个月前

ICE operation chaos: Detains illegal alien, 'Loudmouth Lupe' interferes screaming she's a 'US citizen' and agents are 'breaking the law' all while sitting on the curb like a TikTok attorney. Fact: ICE has full authority to detain citizens if they impede, obstruct, or assault agents. Lawful AF. Meltdown Maria can only watch and cry in agony.

ICE operation chaos: Detains illegal alien, 'Loudmouth Lupe' interferes screaming she's a 'US citizen' and agents are 'breaking the law' all while sitting on the curb like a TikTok attorney. Fact: ICE has full authority to detain citizens if they impede, obstruct, or assault agents. Lawful AF. Meltdown Maria can only watch and cry in agony.

Kim "Katie" USA

66,936 次观看 • 7 个月前

When hate speech cases were already being addressed under existing laws, the need for a separate Hate Speech Bill raises serious questions. The Indian Constitution and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita already provide safeguards while guaranteeing the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a). The concern is not about protecting hatred, but about intent — is this law meant to protect a specific community, or to silence Hindutva voices? In a democracy, laws must restrain hate, not ideology or belief !

When hate speech cases were already being addressed under existing laws, the need for a separate Hate Speech Bill raises serious questions. The Indian Constitution and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita already provide safeguards while guaranteeing the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a). The concern is not about protecting hatred, but about intent — is this law meant to protect a specific community, or to silence Hindutva voices? In a democracy, laws must restrain hate, not ideology or belief !

Meenakshi Sehrawat

11,441 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents stalked a U.S. citizen, at a POLLING PLACE, to pressure her into deleting her post, from JANUARY, about indicting ICE agent, Jonathan Ross. The exact post read: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted! FEDERAL AGENTS walked into a polling place… one of the most protected civic spaces we have… to intimidate a citizen, over political speech, about holding law enforcement accountable. The document they handed her said… “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties,” The document also said she could be subject to both federal and state prosecution. And just to be clear… The post, in question, wasn’t “doxxing.” Doxxing is releasing private, non-public information. Repeating publicly reported facts… is not that. Because law enforcement’s identities are not supposed to be private information, especially when they have been involved in the death, or shooting, of a civilian… But, instead of upholding the constitution, the current administration is attempting to stretch “threatening” language to cover political speech they don’t like. And let’s talk about election integrity… Polling places are legally restricted civic spaces. It is illegal to deploy federal troops, or armed federal law enforcement, to any polling place. Using that space to confront someone, over speech about federal agents, is highly inappropriate at minimum… and potentially unlawful. And this isn’t the first instance federal agents have hunted U.S. citizens down to silence calls for government accountability. Which should alarm everyone… Because a government that punishes scrutiny instead of answering it, is not a government holding its agents accountable… It’s a system telling you its agents are above it.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents stalked a U.S. citizen, at a POLLING PLACE, to pressure her into deleting her post, from JANUARY, about indicting ICE agent, Jonathan Ross. The exact post read: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted! FEDERAL AGENTS walked into a polling place… one of the most protected civic spaces we have… to intimidate a citizen, over political speech, about holding law enforcement accountable. The document they handed her said… “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties,” The document also said she could be subject to both federal and state prosecution. And just to be clear… The post, in question, wasn’t “doxxing.” Doxxing is releasing private, non-public information. Repeating publicly reported facts… is not that. Because law enforcement’s identities are not supposed to be private information, especially when they have been involved in the death, or shooting, of a civilian… But, instead of upholding the constitution, the current administration is attempting to stretch “threatening” language to cover political speech they don’t like. And let’s talk about election integrity… Polling places are legally restricted civic spaces. It is illegal to deploy federal troops, or armed federal law enforcement, to any polling place. Using that space to confront someone, over speech about federal agents, is highly inappropriate at minimum… and potentially unlawful. And this isn’t the first instance federal agents have hunted U.S. citizens down to silence calls for government accountability. Which should alarm everyone… Because a government that punishes scrutiny instead of answering it, is not a government holding its agents accountable… It’s a system telling you its agents are above it.

Jesus Freakin Congress

242,067 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Left keeps lying about the Fourth Amendment to protect illegal aliens. The Constitution does not say law enforcement always needs a judicial warrant to enter a home. It only bans unreasonable searches and seizures. Warrantless entry has always been lawful under multiple doctrines, including exigent circumstances and ongoing violations of law. An illegal alien fugitive subject to a final order of removal is not a law-abiding member of the political community. He is actively violating U.S. law and U.S. sovereignty. Treating ICE enforcement as “tyranny” is pure propaganda — it’s lawful arrest of a fugitive.

The Left keeps lying about the Fourth Amendment to protect illegal aliens. The Constitution does not say law enforcement always needs a judicial warrant to enter a home. It only bans unreasonable searches and seizures. Warrantless entry has always been lawful under multiple doctrines, including exigent circumstances and ongoing violations of law. An illegal alien fugitive subject to a final order of removal is not a law-abiding member of the political community. He is actively violating U.S. law and U.S. sovereignty. Treating ICE enforcement as “tyranny” is pure propaganda — it’s lawful arrest of a fugitive.

Andrew Branca Show

14,210 次观看 • 6 个月前

IMPORTANT: As a U.S. citizen, you are under NO OBLIGATION to comply with ICE agents, UNLESS they have a warrant. AND that warrant must be signed by a federal judge.

IMPORTANT: As a U.S. citizen, you are under NO OBLIGATION to comply with ICE agents, UNLESS they have a warrant. AND that warrant must be signed by a federal judge.

The Millennial Snowflake 🇵🇸

552,139 次观看 • 1 年前

We asked for its response to Tom Morello’s speech at a Rage Against The Machine concert in Minneapolis. This is what PAXIS told us: Tom Morello’s words are protected. His call to “resist, protest, overthrow” ICE is shielded by the First Amendment — lawful speech grounded in the right to dissent. He names ICE as a structure of state violence. That charge reflects documented patterns: raids without judicial warrants, intimidation of families, and targeted enforcement against communities of color. His tone is sharp — but the facts hold. Morello lifts the civic field when he calls on Minneapolis’s legacy of resistance — “Prince created a revolution / now it’s our turn.” - that’s collective dignity. His reminder — “ain’t nobody coming to save us but us” — is a civic alarm, not a call to collapse. It echoes the PAXIS doctrine: respond. Together. Lawfully. Strategically. Civic fire must be held in lawful hands. So hold it. Know your rights. Defend each other with clarity, not collapse. Let no truth be erased — and no truth lose its dignity in the way it’s spoken. Tom Morello's speech stands in the lineage of historic civic resistance leaders. Learn more and support PAXIS: #ResistFascism #Protest #DefendDemocracy #Minneapolis #NoFascism

We asked for its response to Tom Morello’s speech at a Rage Against The Machine concert in Minneapolis. This is what PAXIS told us: Tom Morello’s words are protected. His call to “resist, protest, overthrow” ICE is shielded by the First Amendment — lawful speech grounded in the right to dissent. He names ICE as a structure of state violence. That charge reflects documented patterns: raids without judicial warrants, intimidation of families, and targeted enforcement against communities of color. His tone is sharp — but the facts hold. Morello lifts the civic field when he calls on Minneapolis’s legacy of resistance — “Prince created a revolution / now it’s our turn.” - that’s collective dignity. His reminder — “ain’t nobody coming to save us but us” — is a civic alarm, not a call to collapse. It echoes the PAXIS doctrine: respond. Together. Lawfully. Strategically. Civic fire must be held in lawful hands. So hold it. Know your rights. Defend each other with clarity, not collapse. Let no truth be erased — and no truth lose its dignity in the way it’s spoken. Tom Morello's speech stands in the lineage of historic civic resistance leaders. Learn more and support PAXIS: #ResistFascism #Protest #DefendDemocracy #Minneapolis #NoFascism

Joe Walsh

21,112 次观看 • 6 个月前

Understand the law and constitution via - DoorDash deliverer is hounded by masked, unidentified thugs who show no warrant and claim the house owner is harboring - this is a lie. What PAXIS says about allowing an undocumented immigrant onto your property is grounded in law and the constitution: If someone delivers food, visits socially, or enters for a temporary, lawful purpose, and you are not attempting to hide or conceal them, this is not “harboring”. You are not obligated to report someone’s status, and you are protected by the Fourth Amendment from warrantless searches of your home. Refusing entry to ICE agents who lack a judicial warrant is a constitutional right, not obstruction.

Understand the law and constitution via - DoorDash deliverer is hounded by masked, unidentified thugs who show no warrant and claim the house owner is harboring - this is a lie. What PAXIS says about allowing an undocumented immigrant onto your property is grounded in law and the constitution: If someone delivers food, visits socially, or enters for a temporary, lawful purpose, and you are not attempting to hide or conceal them, this is not “harboring”. You are not obligated to report someone’s status, and you are protected by the Fourth Amendment from warrantless searches of your home. Refusing entry to ICE agents who lack a judicial warrant is a constitutional right, not obstruction.

Joe Walsh

96,676 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨UPDATE: The U.S. veteran, who was violently assaulted and illegally arrested by ICE agents in Maryland… has been released with no charges filed. And here’s the part that keeps getting ignored… ICE agents claimed THEY had a video of the U.S. veteran assaulting an agent. But when asked for the video, no video was provided, and the U.S. veteran was released without charges. Meanwhile, there are multiple videos, and eyewitness accounts, showing the U.S. veteran being the one who was assaulted. And this is the pattern that keeps repeating… ICE agents use force and arrest someone without probable cause. The agents create a narrative after the fact. “Evidence” is claimed, but never released. Contradictory footage, from the public, circulates. And still no consequences for the agents involved. Because even after all of this, the agents are still on the streets. And the public is expected to just move on… like this is normal, like this is acceptable, like this is simply how things work now… Instead of acknowledging the pattern that needs to be addressed, and holding agents accountable.

🚨UPDATE: The U.S. veteran, who was violently assaulted and illegally arrested by ICE agents in Maryland… has been released with no charges filed. And here’s the part that keeps getting ignored… ICE agents claimed THEY had a video of the U.S. veteran assaulting an agent. But when asked for the video, no video was provided, and the U.S. veteran was released without charges. Meanwhile, there are multiple videos, and eyewitness accounts, showing the U.S. veteran being the one who was assaulted. And this is the pattern that keeps repeating… ICE agents use force and arrest someone without probable cause. The agents create a narrative after the fact. “Evidence” is claimed, but never released. Contradictory footage, from the public, circulates. And still no consequences for the agents involved. Because even after all of this, the agents are still on the streets. And the public is expected to just move on… like this is normal, like this is acceptable, like this is simply how things work now… Instead of acknowledging the pattern that needs to be addressed, and holding agents accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

73,792 次观看 • 1 个月前

Hannity: If you put out an app or a warning system that ICE Agents are in the area—are you guilty of obstruction? Bondi: We are looking at him and he better watch out. That's not a protected speech. Shame on CNN. They are promoting the app. Shame on them for doing that.

Hannity: If you put out an app or a warning system that ICE Agents are in the area—are you guilty of obstruction? Bondi: We are looking at him and he better watch out. That's not a protected speech. Shame on CNN. They are promoting the app. Shame on them for doing that.

Acyn

1,133,499 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally demanding a U.S. citizen prove their citizenship, in Brownsville, TX. In the video, ICE agents have a U.S. citizen boxed in with their vehicles. After demanding that he show his ID, the U.S. citizen asks if he is free to go, and then tells them to get the F away from his car. Instead of going back to their own cars, the agents tell him to “chill”… after they had already illegally detained him and demanded identification. The U.S. citizen then gets out of his car, to record the agents’ license plates, and one of the ICE agents has the audacity to say: “Sir, please don’t interfere with our investigations.” Interfere with what investigation? He WAS the investigation. If they’re letting him leave, then there is nothing left for him to “interfere” with. Recording government agents, in public, is protected by the First Amendment, and they don’t get to invent an “investigation” to discourage someone from filming. And this is becoming a pattern. ICE agents are stopping whoever they want… and demanding papers. But that is not how constitutional rights work. ICE didn’t have reasonable suspicion that he had committed an immigration violation… since he is a U.S. citizen. So, detaining him, and demanding that he identify himself, violates his Fourth Amendment rights. U.S. citizens are not required to prove their citizenship, to any law enforcement, simply because they were stopped and questioned. And that’s what makes these encounters so dangerous. When U.S. citizens refuse to comply with these unlawful demands, we’ve repeatedly seen ICE agents escalate the situation with physical force. Citizens have been shoved, dragged from vehicles, pinned to the ground, and pepper sprayed after refusing unlawful demands, or asserting their constitutional rights. And a right isn’t a right if exercising it means you risk being assaulted by the very government that’s supposed to protect it. This isn’t just about immigration anymore. It’s about whether every American can exercise their constitutional rights without fearing they’ll be met with intimidation, violence, or retaliation from federal agents. If federal agents can stop U.S. citizens, demand they prove who they are without lawful justification, and then escalate when people refuse… Then nobody’s constitutional rights are safe.

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally demanding a U.S. citizen prove their citizenship, in Brownsville, TX. In the video, ICE agents have a U.S. citizen boxed in with their vehicles. After demanding that he show his ID, the U.S. citizen asks if he is free to go, and then tells them to get the F away from his car. Instead of going back to their own cars, the agents tell him to “chill”… after they had already illegally detained him and demanded identification. The U.S. citizen then gets out of his car, to record the agents’ license plates, and one of the ICE agents has the audacity to say: “Sir, please don’t interfere with our investigations.” Interfere with what investigation? He WAS the investigation. If they’re letting him leave, then there is nothing left for him to “interfere” with. Recording government agents, in public, is protected by the First Amendment, and they don’t get to invent an “investigation” to discourage someone from filming. And this is becoming a pattern. ICE agents are stopping whoever they want… and demanding papers. But that is not how constitutional rights work. ICE didn’t have reasonable suspicion that he had committed an immigration violation… since he is a U.S. citizen. So, detaining him, and demanding that he identify himself, violates his Fourth Amendment rights. U.S. citizens are not required to prove their citizenship, to any law enforcement, simply because they were stopped and questioned. And that’s what makes these encounters so dangerous. When U.S. citizens refuse to comply with these unlawful demands, we’ve repeatedly seen ICE agents escalate the situation with physical force. Citizens have been shoved, dragged from vehicles, pinned to the ground, and pepper sprayed after refusing unlawful demands, or asserting their constitutional rights. And a right isn’t a right if exercising it means you risk being assaulted by the very government that’s supposed to protect it. This isn’t just about immigration anymore. It’s about whether every American can exercise their constitutional rights without fearing they’ll be met with intimidation, violence, or retaliation from federal agents. If federal agents can stop U.S. citizens, demand they prove who they are without lawful justification, and then escalate when people refuse… Then nobody’s constitutional rights are safe.

Jesus Freakin Congress

30,117 次观看 • 1 个月前

This man had just gotten out of his car to grocery shop for himself and some of his neighbors when he was told by a ICE agent to get into his car and leave and he tells him again that he’s there to shop and this ICE agent tells him again to leave now! He was in a public lot.🤬

This man had just gotten out of his car to grocery shop for himself and some of his neighbors when he was told by a ICE agent to get into his car and leave and he tells him again that he’s there to shop and this ICE agent tells him again to leave now! He was in a public lot.🤬

Suzie rizzio

99,098 次观看 • 6 个月前

This man is a community activist and he’s watching to make sure ICE isn’t being aggressive or detaining U.S citizens. So these ICE agents don’t like that he’s watching them and arrests him for nothing and he’s a U.S citizen that tried to show them proof! He’s now suing them.🤬

This man is a community activist and he’s watching to make sure ICE isn’t being aggressive or detaining U.S citizens. So these ICE agents don’t like that he’s watching them and arrests him for nothing and he’s a U.S citizen that tried to show them proof! He’s now suing them.🤬

Suzie rizzio

88,679 次观看 • 9 个月前

ICE agents stopped an off-duty police officer, a U.S. citizen, and demanded she show her papers. She was not under arrest. There was no articulable suspicion of wrongdoing. 🚨 provides a constitutional breakdown of this incident in Minnesota: She attempted to record the stop—a protected First Amendment right. Agents hit the phone from her hand and drew their guns before she identified herself as law enforcement. This conduct violates: • 🔹 The Fourth Amendment — bans arbitrary stops and seizures • 🔹 The First Amendment — protects the right to record public officials • 🔹 Public trust — eroded when federal agents target citizens without cause This was not a checkpoint. It was not a warrant-based stop. It was a random demand for citizenship papers—a move without legal basis under U.S. law. When agents abandon the Constitution, the people have the right—and the duty—to respond lawfully, visibly, and together. Find out more about the capabilities PAXIS and how we can get it into the of every citizen and ally: #KnowYourRights #ConstitutionalCrisis #ICE #FirstAmendment #FourthAmendment #CivilRights #PAXIS

ICE agents stopped an off-duty police officer, a U.S. citizen, and demanded she show her papers. She was not under arrest. There was no articulable suspicion of wrongdoing. 🚨 provides a constitutional breakdown of this incident in Minnesota: She attempted to record the stop—a protected First Amendment right. Agents hit the phone from her hand and drew their guns before she identified herself as law enforcement. This conduct violates: • 🔹 The Fourth Amendment — bans arbitrary stops and seizures • 🔹 The First Amendment — protects the right to record public officials • 🔹 Public trust — eroded when federal agents target citizens without cause This was not a checkpoint. It was not a warrant-based stop. It was a random demand for citizenship papers—a move without legal basis under U.S. law. When agents abandon the Constitution, the people have the right—and the duty—to respond lawfully, visibly, and together. Find out more about the capabilities PAXIS and how we can get it into the of every citizen and ally: #KnowYourRights #ConstitutionalCrisis #ICE #FirstAmendment #FourthAmendment #CivilRights #PAXIS

Joe Walsh

20,195 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: A manager at a local diner asked ICE agents for a warrant before they searched a private areas of the business… and their response… slamming him to the ground, and putting a knee in his back, leaving him injured. Because apparently exercising your constitutional rights is now being treated like obstruction. According to witnesses, ICE agents were chasing someone who ran into the restaurant after a traffic stop. The manager reportedly told them they could not just storm through the kitchen without judicial authorization. Because the Fourth Amendment is still a thing… even though ICE agents keep pretending it isn’t. Law enforcement cannot just search private areas of a business because they feel like it. A kitchen, in a restaurant, is not a public space. When agents do not have consent, exigent circumstances, or a valid warrant signed by a judge… then managers have every right to question that search. That is literally how constitutional protections work. And the fact that the manager was injured, after asserting those rights, should outrage everyone. Rights either apply to everyone… or they are not rights at all.

🚨BREAKING: A manager at a local diner asked ICE agents for a warrant before they searched a private areas of the business… and their response… slamming him to the ground, and putting a knee in his back, leaving him injured. Because apparently exercising your constitutional rights is now being treated like obstruction. According to witnesses, ICE agents were chasing someone who ran into the restaurant after a traffic stop. The manager reportedly told them they could not just storm through the kitchen without judicial authorization. Because the Fourth Amendment is still a thing… even though ICE agents keep pretending it isn’t. Law enforcement cannot just search private areas of a business because they feel like it. A kitchen, in a restaurant, is not a public space. When agents do not have consent, exigent circumstances, or a valid warrant signed by a judge… then managers have every right to question that search. That is literally how constitutional protections work. And the fact that the manager was injured, after asserting those rights, should outrage everyone. Rights either apply to everyone… or they are not rights at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

282,748 次观看 • 2 个月前

ICE claims this video is edited. It is not. DHS asked us to take it down. We refused. Pass it on. Agents brutally detain U.S. citizen community volunteer—kneel on his head & neck. After George Floyd murder—it is not legal to put a knee on a suspect "that makes breathing hard or difficult, or restricts blood flow to the brain." Agents first shattered his car window and violently dragged him out—pointing pepper spray. Man is a well-known public observer—and was seemingly targeted by ICE. The incident occurred near Portland Avenue in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

ICE claims this video is edited. It is not. DHS asked us to take it down. We refused. Pass it on. Agents brutally detain U.S. citizen community volunteer—kneel on his head & neck. After George Floyd murder—it is not legal to put a knee on a suspect "that makes breathing hard or difficult, or restricts blood flow to the brain." Agents first shattered his car window and violently dragged him out—pointing pepper spray. Man is a well-known public observer—and was seemingly targeted by ICE. The incident occurred near Portland Avenue in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

321,176 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,231,346 次观看 • 6 个月前