Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨BREAKING: A manager at a local diner asked ICE agents for a warrant before they searched a private areas of the business… and their response… slamming him to the ground, and putting a knee in his back, leaving him injured. Because apparently exercising your constitutional rights is now being...

283,020 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

ICE agents are violating the constitution, and putting everyone in danger.

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

And if you think you are safe in your own fenced in yard…

Profilbild von VOTE RED DONT WANNA GO BACK
VOTE RED DONT WANNA GO BACKvor 4 Monaten

God bless ice and the job they do. And I'm so glad that all you people bitching about this have not had your daughter's raped or killed. Oh by the way all the people in this picture they're all dead at the hands of illegal aliens. Wake the hell up

Profilbild von Strictly Independent
Strictly Independentvor 4 Monaten

Nope. Your retarded, misinformed, or deliberately misleading people. It's not a 4th amendment search when you follow a criminal in pursuit. It is HARBORING a criminal, and aiding and abetting to protect illegals.

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

ICE agents are becoming increasingly violent toward U.S. citizens…

Profilbild von Ramblin Rover
Ramblin Rovervor 4 Monaten

@JoaquinCastrotx Whole story here, the manager actively interfered with the ICE operation, which escalated into a physical confrontation and his arrest.

Profilbild von The Lincoln Republican
The Lincoln Republicanvor 4 Monaten

My advice when federal agents are trying to do what the government was elected to do is to stfu and gtf out of the way

Profilbild von David St. Germain
David St. Germainvor 4 Monaten

The EXEMPTION for needing a warrant is chasing a fleeing suspect. When you OBSTRUCT a lawful pursuit, you’ll find yourself arrested. @DHSgov @SecMullinDHS @ICEgov

Profilbild von COtoMD
COtoMDvor 4 Monaten

@KatRav6 $50 million paid out already for ICE acting illegally. 400 tort claims against ICE in 2025 alone. Who will stop this?

Profilbild von Bluenami
Bluenamivor 4 Monaten

@g_morkert These stupid cosplay assholes are not supposed to do a lot of things but they do anyways. The only way to end this is to jail everyone of these fuckers that break the law and don’t follow the constitution. Until then they will continue as is, unfortunately.

Profilbild von El Contador
El Contadorvor 4 Monaten

Well… obviously you don’t understand the stuff you are spewing as they did have exigent circumstances by chasing a fleeing fugitive into the building. So, technically, the manager was most likely obstructing…

Profilbild von TPBlue 🇺🇸🦅
TPBlue 🇺🇸🦅vor 4 Monaten

@jakeofthestreet

Profilbild von Intrepid News
Intrepid Newsvor 4 Monaten

Apparently you don’t realize that chasing someone who flees into a building allows police to chase them. They are not required to stop and get a warrant in order to continue chasing them.

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

They are doing this knowing there are cameras all around… now imagine what they are doing IN the facilities.

Profilbild von Sunshine Diamond Eyes
Sunshine Diamond Eyesvor 4 Monaten

They were pursuing him and either you were flat out lying or you don't understand American laws. Stop lying You sure have a hard on for your criminal foreigners. Their votes must be so important to you. You're willing to risk American lives. This is what we voted for. Americans never asked for Democrats' criminal invasion.

Profilbild von Aeroguy
Aeroguyvor 4 Monaten

Hot pursuit. Suspects literally fled from a traffic stop into the diner. Exigent circumstances let agents follow without a warrant; straight 4th Amendment law (Santana, etc.). Demanding one mid-chase doesn't make you a hero; it makes you an obstructer. The manager doesn't get to play judge and block federal agents from a felony suspect. Learn the exceptions before filming the outrage. I'll be nicer if you're smarter.

Profilbild von Gooboberti
Goobobertivor 4 Monaten

You people are such disgusting gaslighting liars. Nice edited video, dumbo. Even in this video, he’s directly in the officer’s face with his finger right at him. Then the video edits and he’s on the ground Hurr durr I wonder what happened. Perhaps the guy physically obstructed, pushed, or hit the officer.

Profilbild von Deborah, My Friends Call Me Slayer💙🔥🐸⚔️🐸🔥💙
Deborah, My Friends Call Me Slayer💙🔥🐸⚔️🐸🔥💙vor 4 Monaten

@markkrampus42 Sue the fuck out of them.

Profilbild von ikonix360
ikonix360vor 4 Monaten

The problem with this is the manager being comfortable enough with lax enforcement of laws to allow the illegal to hide in the kitchen. The manager should have never let the illegal into the kitchen out of fear of being prosecuted for it.

Profilbild von C T Cowboy
C T Cowboyvor 4 Monaten

Harboring an illegal alien and obstruction is a federal crime.. Democrats have indoctrinated their following with interference rhetoric so much that they are getting hurt.. Demshevick leadership loves this because they want to stand on graves and virtue signal..

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

You can’t watch this video and think this is okay…

Profilbild von Franklin C Flint
Franklin C Flintvor 4 Monaten

Law enforcement CAN chase a suspect into a private business - they have probable cause and are justified in doing so.

Profilbild von StefPuck 🇺🇸
StefPuck 🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

good. the courts have upheld “hot pursuit”. they dont need a warrant. stop obstructing law enforcement. hope this helps

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

Hot pursuit is only for a felon, or a serious offense… so, unless the person assaulted an agent, and then ran… it’s not a hot pursuit.

Profilbild von StefPuck 🇺🇸
StefPuck 🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

thats fake news. you dont have the right to flee and elude law enforcement for ANY crime. you obv know nothing about the law, making up your own comments does not change exigent circumstances recognized by the scotus

Profilbild von Keith Amherst
Keith Amherstvor 4 Monaten

exigent circumstances, seems to fit. Forget all that other shit.

Profilbild von Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congressvor 4 Monaten

Oh look, a bot

Profilbild von Based Tyrone
Based Tyronevor 4 Monaten

Totally legal to harbor fugitives, tho.

Profilbild von Léa Moreau
Léa Moreauvor 4 Monaten

Oh please. ICE was in active hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect who ran into the diner. They don’t need to stop and get a warrant while chasing someone. The manager chose to physically interfere instead of stepping aside. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Stop defending obstruction.

Profilbild von Enrico Pallazzo
Enrico Pallazzovor 4 Monaten

It’s people like you why terrorist use schools and hospitals to store their weapons.

Profilbild von Bella Blue 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Bella Blue 🇺🇸🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

So he was impeding law enforcement by hiding a criminal who ran into his restaurant. Sounds like ICE did the right thing.

Profilbild von MGYSGTUSMCRET1775
MGYSGTUSMCRET1775vor 4 Monaten

It’s called evading and the pursuit doesn’t have to stop because the person being pursued runs into some business. Hindering the pursuit can be charged obstruction.

Profilbild von PROJECT TRUMP UNITY!!!
PROJECT TRUMP UNITY!!!vor 4 Monaten

You obviously don't know the facts involved. They were in pursuit of him BEFORE he entered the establishment. That does NOT protect him AT ALL!

Profilbild von rgross1967 Gross
rgross1967 Grossvor 4 Monaten

@MAGACult2 This is what 77mil retarded freaks voted for. Also is why the crime rate in red states are rising like summertime temperatures. Being racist hateful & spiteful people are finding being on the wrong side of history & every political argument ain’t so pleasant. 🧐

Profilbild von Eric Henson
Eric Hensonvor 4 Monaten

You truly are a special kind of stupid. You did absolutely zero research when rage typing this “horror story” didn’t you? Zero, nada, zilch. Simply because people get triggered by Federal Law Enforcement operations doesn’t mean that makes their actions illegal. Durp.

Profilbild von denise friday
denise fridayvor 4 Monaten

@chessclubgringo I hope he sues those SOBs.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent was just caught on video violently shoving a TEENAGER to the ground, in a Chicago suburb. But it gets worse… In Joliet, IL, ICE agents jumped out of their cars, racially profiled a man, began handcuffing him, and forced him into an unmarked vehicle that had its license plate covered. And they did all of this before even confirming who he was. As U.S. citizens began recording the incident, ICE agents started forcing them farther back, even though they were not interfering with the arrest. One of the agents looked at a teenager, who was just standing there and filming, and said, “Step back a little bit.” The teenager wasn’t interfering. In fact, a woman was standing even closer. And then, without warning, the ICE agent violently shoved the teenager to the ground. Moments later, another ICE agent pulled out a taser and threatened the legal observers, despite them remaining away from the vehicle, and not interfering. And after all of that, about 20 minutes later… ICE released the man they had kidnapped because they realized he was not undocumented. Think about how insane that is… A man was detained, handcuffed, and taken away before ICE even confirmed they had the right person. That’s exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists… to protect people from unreasonable seizures by the government. And then there is the issue of an ICE agent shoving a teenager to the ground… Using significant physical force against someone, especially a teenager, who is not posing an immediate threat, not resisting, and not interfering… is excessive force. Federal agents do not get a free pass to assault teenagers because they are standing nearby. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement in public, and government officials cannot use intimidation, or force, to silence people who are lawfully documenting their actions. This wasn’t just about one man being kidnapped…. It was about everyone standing there. A teenager was thrown to the ground. Legal observers were threatened. U.S. citizens exercising their constitutional rights were intimidated. And an innocent man lost 20 minutes of his freedom because ICE believes they are allowed to kidnap anyone they want. So, why are these ICE agents not being held accountable?

Jesus Freakin Congress

252,505 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally demanding a U.S. citizen prove their citizenship, in Brownsville, TX. In the video, ICE agents have a U.S. citizen boxed in with their vehicles. After demanding that he show his ID, the U.S. citizen asks if he is free to go, and then tells them to get the F away from his car. Instead of going back to their own cars, the agents tell him to “chill”… after they had already illegally detained him and demanded identification. The U.S. citizen then gets out of his car, to record the agents’ license plates, and one of the ICE agents has the audacity to say: “Sir, please don’t interfere with our investigations.” Interfere with what investigation? He WAS the investigation. If they’re letting him leave, then there is nothing left for him to “interfere” with. Recording government agents, in public, is protected by the First Amendment, and they don’t get to invent an “investigation” to discourage someone from filming. And this is becoming a pattern. ICE agents are stopping whoever they want… and demanding papers. But that is not how constitutional rights work. ICE didn’t have reasonable suspicion that he had committed an immigration violation… since he is a U.S. citizen. So, detaining him, and demanding that he identify himself, violates his Fourth Amendment rights. U.S. citizens are not required to prove their citizenship, to any law enforcement, simply because they were stopped and questioned. And that’s what makes these encounters so dangerous. When U.S. citizens refuse to comply with these unlawful demands, we’ve repeatedly seen ICE agents escalate the situation with physical force. Citizens have been shoved, dragged from vehicles, pinned to the ground, and pepper sprayed after refusing unlawful demands, or asserting their constitutional rights. And a right isn’t a right if exercising it means you risk being assaulted by the very government that’s supposed to protect it. This isn’t just about immigration anymore. It’s about whether every American can exercise their constitutional rights without fearing they’ll be met with intimidation, violence, or retaliation from federal agents. If federal agents can stop U.S. citizens, demand they prove who they are without lawful justification, and then escalate when people refuse… Then nobody’s constitutional rights are safe.

Jesus Freakin Congress

37,733 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents allegedly hit a man with their vehicle, while on private property, in Oklahoma City… and when the property manager told them to get off the property, they argued with her instead. You can hear the man crying out in pain in the background. She tells ICE they can call an ambulance for him, but they need to leave the property. And she doesn’t back down. Eventually, an ambulance and stretcher arrive. Being an ICE agent does not mean you get to ignore the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. And that protection applies to everyone in the United States…regardless of immigration status. ICE cannot walk onto private property because they have badges and guns. They need consent, a proper warrant, or a legally recognized exception to enter private areas for enforcement purposes. And if the property manager is telling you to leave, and you don’t have legal authority to remain there, you don’t get to just argue your way into staying. Then there is the person we can literally hear crying in pain. If ICE agents hit someone with a vehicle, we deserve answers. Because this is what happens when federal agents start believing the rules don’t apply to them… They enter private property. They use force. They hurt people. And then they expect everyone to just stand there and accept it because they’re with ICE. Federal agents are not above the law. And the fact that a property manager had to stand there and tell armed federal agents that they need to get off private property… should be absolutely infuriating.

Jesus Freakin Congress

32,018 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🚨ICE agents illegally threatened to tase a PASSENGER for refusing to exit a vehicle… after lying about having a warrant for him, in Lennox, California. In the video, the agents repeatedly insisted they had a warrant for the passenger, demanded he get out of the car, and threatened to tase him if he didn’t comply. But, when the passenger continued to ask to see the warrant, the agents suddenly asked for his ID. After running his identification, they decided to change the story… Agents then started asking the driver for their ID, despite admitting they did not know who they were dealing with. When questioned, one agent first claimed they had a warrant for the passenger, then admitted they were “writing it right now,” before finally acknowledging, “I thought it was you.” So, to break this all down… ICE agents threatened to tase someone over a warrant they didn’t have, for a person they hadn’t even identified. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. Government agents do not get to detain whoever they want, threaten force, demand identification from everyone present, and just figure out who they are dealing with later. Because that’s illegal. If ICE had a valid warrant, they should have been able to identify the subject of that warrant before threatening someone with a taser. And if they didn’t know who they were talking to… then what exactly was the legal basis for the detention, the threats, and the demands for identification? This is why people are outraged. And every time this behavior is excused, it sends the message that ICE agents can ignore constitutional rights, threaten innocent people, and walk away like nothing happened.

Jesus Freakin Congress

59,014 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents in New York illegally surrounded two cars and demanded the people inside prove their citizenship. Community members showed up and immediately started asking the questions ICE never wants asked on camera: “Do you have a warrant?” The agents claimed they did. But when people asked to actually SEE the warrant… they refused. Because they didn’t have one. That’s the constitutional violation right there. In the United States, federal agents cannot legally detain people, block their vehicles in, and demand proof of citizenship without lawful justification. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. You don’t lose those rights because ICE decides to profile you. And unless agents have a judicial warrant signed by a judge, or actual legal probable cause tied to a crime, they cannot just trap people in their cars fishing for immigration status. ICE keeps counting on intimidation instead of law. They surround cars with multiple agents, act aggressive, throw around words like “warrant,” and hope people are too scared to question them. But the second community members demanded proof, the whole thing fell apart. Both cars were eventually released… because ICE never had the legal right to stop them in the first place. This is exactly why people recording matters. This is exactly why communities showing up matters. And this is exactly why constitutional rights matter… especially when federal agents are acting like they don’t apply to them anymore.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,498 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents illegally smashed through the glass door of a locked auto body shop, without a warrant, to detain the shop owner and an employee, in West Valley City, Utah. Yes, agents are violating the Constitution all over the country, not just in Minnesota. In the video, two agents are already standing inside the body shop when the owner’s wife asks them the most basic, constitutionally required question, “Do you have a warrant?” …after they broke in. They illegally ignore her request and instead tell HER to stay back. She continues demanding to see a warrant. And then they say the quiet part out loud: “We don’t need one.” They absolutely do, which is exactly what she tells them. They continue ignoring her, after illegally breaking into a locked, private business, while ordering her to back up inside her own workplace. The agents then begin questioning the shop owner and an employee, despite not knowing their status, and having zero probable cause. She tells them, “My lawyer is coming, do you want to get sued?” And the agents laugh. Sit with that. Border Patrol agents force entry into a private business, without a warrant, and laugh about accountability. The agents admit on camera that they broke the glass door to enter the private property. She says that’s why you had to break in… “Because you don’t have a warrant!” And the agent says again: “It’s because we don’t need one.” They detain the shop owner and an employee anyway, after breaking in, without a warrant… despite both men having no criminal records. This is a blatant Fourth Amendment violation. A locked business is private property… where a warrant is not optional. If this is tolerated, it sets the precedent that federal agents can smash their way into ANY business, detain whoever they want, and disappear them. That is not law enforcement. That is an open assault on constitutional rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,217,157 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents demanding a U.S. citizen prove his citizenship… this time, in Philadelphia. In the video, ICE agents box in a man’s car and immediately demand ID, without giving an explanation… Just, “There is a subject we are looking for.” The man responds exactly how anyone who knows their rights would: “What did I do?” And that matters… Because under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement cannot detain you just to “check.” They need reasonable, articulable suspicion that you committed a crime, or are the specific person they’re looking for. Not just the same race, or, “you look like someone.” When agents surround a vehicle so you can’t leave, that’s a seizure, legally. That triggers constitutional protections. Instead of articulating a reason, the agent shifts the language: “I need to verify your identity.” No, they don’t. They can only demand identification if the stop, itself, is lawful. And the stop is only lawful if they can clearly explain why they believe you are the subject they’re looking for. Notice what they never say in the video: -They never describe the suspect. -They never state a crime. -They never explain how he matches the person they are “looking for.” Just, “we’re looking for someone.” That is not enough. Then, the agent tries to grab the man’s ID without consent. The man pulls it back and says, “Don’t touch my ID.” He’s right. Officers don’t get to physically seize your property without legal authority. The agent then looks at the ID from a distance and walks away. Which tells us something important… If they truly had probable cause, this would not have ended with a casual glance and retreat. ICE does not have authority to randomly stop citizens to “verify” they’re not someone else. That is exactly the kind of policing the Constitution was written to prevent. If agents can box in your car, demand your identity without stating a crime, and fish for compliance… then everyone’s rights are conditional. And conditional rights aren’t rights at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

77,692 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents tried to tell a building manager that a locked apartment building is not private property, in Minneapolis. In the video, the building manager asks a very simple question: Do you have a judicial warrant? The agent’s response? “This is not private property.” Which is a wild thing to say while standing outside a locked residential building you’re trying to get into. He keeps insisting she’s wrong. She doesn’t budge. She finally says, “You aren’t going to get in. I’m not opening the door without a warrant.” Another agent then asks if she can tell him whether the person on his phone is inside. She says, “No.” He then responds, “Can’t tell me that either? Want to keep your criminals in your building?” And she shuts that down by saying, “I want to keep my residents safe.” Which is the exact opposite of what ICE was doing. Because trying to pressure your way into private property, without a judicial warrant, is fishing. It’s hoping someone doesn’t know their rights. And do you know what they hope you don’t realize? If this person was actually some dangerous “worst of the worst” criminal, they love talking about, getting a judge to sign a warrant would be the easiest part of their day. Instead, they show up with no warrant, no legal authority to enter, and try to lie their way inside. Because ICE agents are gambling on the idea that regular people will be too scared to say no. And that’s why they continue to use threats and violence, while claiming that anyone with a pending immigration case is a criminal. This manager saw through that. Which is exactly why the Constitution only works when someone is willing to demand it be upheld. No warrant. No entry.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,320,324 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Male ICE/Border Patrol agents used physical force to unlawfully detain a woman project manager on a private job site after she questioned their authority and refused to hand over ID. In Amherst, NY, the woman is the project manager for a roofing company and was standing on the private property of an active job when agents entered the yard without a warrant. As she asked basic, lawful questions… including whether they had a warrant… and began filming, agents demanded her identification. She refused, which she is legally allowed to do in New York. That refusal triggered an immediate escalation. A male agent ordered her to put her hands against a tree, pushed her into it, and began grabbing at her body and reaching toward her pockets while attempting to restrain her. As this happened, she repeatedly asks, “What are you arresting me for?” The agents never answer. They continue using physical force without stating a charge, legal basis, or probable cause. Refusing to provide ID is not a crime in New York. Filming federal agents is not a crime. Asking whether officers have a warrant is not a crime. What is unlawful is entering private property without a judicial warrant, physically restraining someone without probable cause, attempting to search their person, and detaining them while refusing to state a reason. This was not enforcement. It was retaliation. And when masked male federal agents feel empowered to shove a woman into a tree and put their hands on her for asserting her rights on her own job site, it exposes just how far beyond the law they believe they are operating.

Jesus Freakin Congress

195,782 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten