正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

When psychology beats logic, Now he has answered himself. Buana huko clock app wana mark exams thick & fast. Evidence ikona evidence, but the question still remains— Jee, mko sure Ruto sio mwenda wazimu??😂😂😂

George T. Diano

201,031 subscribers

122,378 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Yulemrasta 的头像

Yulemrasta1 年前

"Itumbi, kwani hauku confirm zile answers ulinipea?"

John Mburu 的头像

John Mburu1 年前

Huyu jamaa lazima alikua noma insha na composition.

BlueCollectionKE 的头像

BlueCollectionKE1 年前

Bloggers wa wamunyoro wako na kazi kubwa sana leo

Rock Paper Sizzle 的头像

Rock Paper Sizzle2 年前

💪 Merica, we're taking it back. 💯 You like Trump, you know it, time to show it. ✅ T's for Trump here:

Toni menja 的头像

Toni menja1 年前

but hawa watu wa media ni bure kabisa....bna hawakumwekea hizi clips za gacagua???

Borat Abbass 的头像

Borat Abbass1 年前

evidence that Riggy G is just feeling cold but not fighting for us and should not be an option. let him fight his battles

State Warden🇰🇪 的头像

State Warden🇰🇪1 年前

hizo clips angewekewa kuna watu wangelala ndani

M 的头像

M1 年前

King of lies #RutoMustGo

Gannicus 的头像

Gannicus1 年前

Na si gachieta alisema aliambia raisi hizi vitu ni mbaya. Kwani when did he change. How did he suddenly become very clever after impeachment? 😅 Scam that one.

4727 的头像

47271 年前

Mtu mgeni Kenya anaweza Dhani president anaonewa

Paulus 的头像

Paulus1 年前

@Ltenkeiyon kama si ni, basi ni kama.

相关视频

MOG promised to bring Shatta Wale down and take his royalties in 2021 — and he still didn’t succeed 😂😂😂 Can he even afford a lawyer when Shattawale brings 20 lawyers to defend this case? On the Space, I asked Numba One 🥇 a simple question: Do you have any evidence — your name or split sheet — in the ownership DOCUMENT of those songs you claim you produced? As usual, my tag for him: MOG BABY 😂😂😂. Now, receipts are out showing you took money upfront like every up-and-coming producer. He even took care of your parents. Mind you, these are legal issues — not Twitter rants. DJ KWAKU SLIM I dare Numba One 🥇 to prove to Ghanaians that this is not his usual clout chasing like what he did in 2021

MOG promised to bring Shatta Wale down and take his royalties in 2021 — and he still didn’t succeed 😂😂😂 Can he even afford a lawyer when Shattawale brings 20 lawyers to defend this case? On the Space, I asked Numba One 🥇 a simple question: Do you have any evidence — your name or split sheet — in the ownership DOCUMENT of those songs you claim you produced? As usual, my tag for him: MOG BABY 😂😂😂. Now, receipts are out showing you took money upfront like every up-and-coming producer. He even took care of your parents. Mind you, these are legal issues — not Twitter rants. DJ KWAKU SLIM I dare Numba One 🥇 to prove to Ghanaians that this is not his usual clout chasing like what he did in 2021

Maqcoy Reports

73,428 次观看 • 1 年前

I’ve told you before that you need to work more than an APC Supporter to compare Messi with anybody😂😂😂 When it comes to catalogue of goals, it’s an area you want to shoot yourself on the foot, like are you being suicid@l?😂 this is a route you should not even tow😂 Messi’s catalogue of goals is unmatched. The number of “wow” goals he has is out of the moon. He’s not a tap in or penalty merchant, he plays mostly outside the box and you can imagine the number of brilliant goals he has, please choose another route. Messi that is still scoring wow goals at 39, not tap ins and penalties. You see the goal against Cape Verde, the heavenly first touch? the strike against Algeria, the way he brought down that shot against Egypt, these are recent wow goals from just last month😂 not penalties or tap ins, he also doesn’t try to steal people’s goals😂😂. Should we be talking about Ankara Messi, the amount of times he’s repeated Ankara Messi not just against Getafe, but against Atletico, do you know the number of solo goals Messi has scored where he’s driven the ball from midfield to beat multiple players? Guy you’re not even scared 😂😂 Is it the mad chip against Real Betis from outside the box, the chip against Madrid to announce himself, the solo goal against Madrid in the UCL, the free kick against Allison or the dribbling to place the ball against De Gea? The one against Neuer where he sat Boateng on the floor? Guy, the number of wow goals in Messi’s catalogue is able to end you, stop going that route and spring up another argument that’ll favor you😅 Another myth is that Messi does not score with his right foot, he does not have to. You still call Ronaldo your GOAT for just being a poacher the bulk of his career, this is why Haaland does effortlessly, meanwhile Messi is not your goat despite doing everything (dribbling, playmaking, etc), and still scores like your GOAT. Yet, your metric for goal scoring is not just getting the ball into the net? Like I said, it’s a myth because Messi even has 112 goals with his right foot lol, I’m sure you didn’t know. He also scores headers when it matters like the one he scored against Cristiano 😂, you ignored free kick goals my guy, out of the box goals Just read everything you’ve written, isn’t it even funny to you? Common laugh at yourself. You’re talking of goal catalogue and you have guts to compare someone who scores goals nobody can fathom with a poacher?😂 You’re comparing Ronaldo with someone who will create and still finish, while him (Ronaldo) is waiting for service? You even missed one important part which is shot conversion. Ronaldo has attempted 5,307 shots Messi has attempted 4,244 That is, Ronaldo has taken 1,000 more shots. Guess who has the higher conversion rate?😂😂😂 Messi is still averaging more goals while having 2,000 more dribbles than Ronaldo, 400 more chances created than Ronaldo, a higher average rating than him, 200+ more MOTM than Ronaldo, 150 more assists😂😂 All of these while Ronaldo has played 12,980 more minutes than Messi. Oh I forgot, Ronaldo also has more penalties than Messi😂 Guy I like you, if you were a Messi stan, you won’t be working this hard😭. Enjoy this one highlight make e remind you small 😂, I go add one or two more for comments for you, just for reminders o because there are even better goals.

I’ve told you before that you need to work more than an APC Supporter to compare Messi with anybody😂😂😂 When it comes to catalogue of goals, it’s an area you want to shoot yourself on the foot, like are you being suicid@l?😂 this is a route you should not even tow😂 Messi’s catalogue of goals is unmatched. The number of “wow” goals he has is out of the moon. He’s not a tap in or penalty merchant, he plays mostly outside the box and you can imagine the number of brilliant goals he has, please choose another route. Messi that is still scoring wow goals at 39, not tap ins and penalties. You see the goal against Cape Verde, the heavenly first touch? the strike against Algeria, the way he brought down that shot against Egypt, these are recent wow goals from just last month😂 not penalties or tap ins, he also doesn’t try to steal people’s goals😂😂. Should we be talking about Ankara Messi, the amount of times he’s repeated Ankara Messi not just against Getafe, but against Atletico, do you know the number of solo goals Messi has scored where he’s driven the ball from midfield to beat multiple players? Guy you’re not even scared 😂😂 Is it the mad chip against Real Betis from outside the box, the chip against Madrid to announce himself, the solo goal against Madrid in the UCL, the free kick against Allison or the dribbling to place the ball against De Gea? The one against Neuer where he sat Boateng on the floor? Guy, the number of wow goals in Messi’s catalogue is able to end you, stop going that route and spring up another argument that’ll favor you😅 Another myth is that Messi does not score with his right foot, he does not have to. You still call Ronaldo your GOAT for just being a poacher the bulk of his career, this is why Haaland does effortlessly, meanwhile Messi is not your goat despite doing everything (dribbling, playmaking, etc), and still scores like your GOAT. Yet, your metric for goal scoring is not just getting the ball into the net? Like I said, it’s a myth because Messi even has 112 goals with his right foot lol, I’m sure you didn’t know. He also scores headers when it matters like the one he scored against Cristiano 😂, you ignored free kick goals my guy, out of the box goals Just read everything you’ve written, isn’t it even funny to you? Common laugh at yourself. You’re talking of goal catalogue and you have guts to compare someone who scores goals nobody can fathom with a poacher?😂 You’re comparing Ronaldo with someone who will create and still finish, while him (Ronaldo) is waiting for service? You even missed one important part which is shot conversion. Ronaldo has attempted 5,307 shots Messi has attempted 4,244 That is, Ronaldo has taken 1,000 more shots. Guess who has the higher conversion rate?😂😂😂 Messi is still averaging more goals while having 2,000 more dribbles than Ronaldo, 400 more chances created than Ronaldo, a higher average rating than him, 200+ more MOTM than Ronaldo, 150 more assists😂😂 All of these while Ronaldo has played 12,980 more minutes than Messi. Oh I forgot, Ronaldo also has more penalties than Messi😂 Guy I like you, if you were a Messi stan, you won’t be working this hard😭. Enjoy this one highlight make e remind you small 😂, I go add one or two more for comments for you, just for reminders o because there are even better goals.

TobyWrites

44,878 次观看 • 12 天前

These 2 official statements of DG-ISPR in this 40 sec clip are enough to prove that a PAF F-16 was shot down by a generation-older IAF MiG-21 in 2019. First, he admitted they had captured 02 pilots. One we know, but the "Dusra banda" is still missing. That poor F-16 pilot is now 3 ft under, never recognized, never honored for his sacrifice. Second, Pakistan claimed it didn’t use any F-16s in the conflict, a lie later exposed by publicly available evidence. Not a single Pakistani till date has been able to justify these 2 statements in the last 6 years. 😂

These 2 official statements of DG-ISPR in this 40 sec clip are enough to prove that a PAF F-16 was shot down by a generation-older IAF MiG-21 in 2019. First, he admitted they had captured 02 pilots. One we know, but the "Dusra banda" is still missing. That poor F-16 pilot is now 3 ft under, never recognized, never honored for his sacrifice. Second, Pakistan claimed it didn’t use any F-16s in the conflict, a lie later exposed by publicly available evidence. Not a single Pakistani till date has been able to justify these 2 statements in the last 6 years. 😂

Defence Core

29,585 次观看 • 1 年前

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore — Sorry I Scuffed The First Attempt, I PROMISE You Can Hear Me This Time. 😂 Last Night on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space,Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics? CC:Candace Owens Baron Coleman

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore — Sorry I Scuffed The First Attempt, I PROMISE You Can Hear Me This Time. 😂 Last Night on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space,Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics? CC:Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

39,992 次观看 • 1 个月前

FROM PODCAST TO PARKING GARAGE? 👀❤️💍 Before this viral parking garage kiss, it all started on L-Tido's podcast when Anele Zondo looked him straight in the eyes and asked, "Would you marry me?" 😍 L-Tido didn't rush the answer. He said they already had chemistry but wanted them to know each other better before talking seriously about marriage. Fast forward to today... the two are openly in love, praying together, sharing their journey publicly, and now that parking garage kiss has everyone talking. ❤️ The question now is no longer, "Would you marry me?" It's "When is the wedding?" 😂💍 From the way things are going, do you think this beautiful love story ends with wedding bells and a happily-ever-after... or are South Africans getting too emotionally invested too soon? 😅 Nna I'm definitely rooting for marriage ❤️🇿🇦

FROM PODCAST TO PARKING GARAGE? 👀❤️💍 Before this viral parking garage kiss, it all started on L-Tido's podcast when Anele Zondo looked him straight in the eyes and asked, "Would you marry me?" 😍 L-Tido didn't rush the answer. He said they already had chemistry but wanted them to know each other better before talking seriously about marriage. Fast forward to today... the two are openly in love, praying together, sharing their journey publicly, and now that parking garage kiss has everyone talking. ❤️ The question now is no longer, "Would you marry me?" It's "When is the wedding?" 😂💍 From the way things are going, do you think this beautiful love story ends with wedding bells and a happily-ever-after... or are South Africans getting too emotionally invested too soon? 😅 Nna I'm definitely rooting for marriage ❤️🇿🇦

In A Nutshell🥜

116,160 次观看 • 20 天前

🤷‍♂️ Hamish Falconer just subjected Sophy Ridge (and the entire country) to the most empty, circular, meaning-free waffle I’ve heard in years, leaving her and everyone watching totally baffled. Sophy asks a dead-simple question about the man now in charge of the Brexit “reset” talks: “How are you going to be approaching it? Is it a reset moment? Are you going to be doing it differently from Nick Thomas-Symonds?” Falconer’s reply? A masterclass in saying absolutely nothing: “Nick and the previous prime minister did really important work to help reset relations and I want to consolidate some of the work. But we also need to see if we can go further. The world has changed quite dramatically. The threats have changed dramatically. Threats in Eastern Europe, economic threats, disinformation threats and I want to look at those issues in the round.” Sophy, visibly baffled: “So what does that mean? Is there going to be a reset or not?” He drones on again: “We have already had a reset. We have got to consolidate some of the progress that has been made…” Sophy cuts him off, still lost: “Consolidate? I actually don’t understand what that means?” He tries again with more of the same meaningless sludge, blabbing on and on but still doesn’t answer the question. Sophy’s final verdict after enduring it: “It sounds like pretty much the same then. It doesn’t sound any different.” 😂 She’s right. Not a single concrete answer on whether he’s changing course, what “going further” actually looks like, or how any of this relates to the EU. Just endless “consolidate… in the round… threats have changed” word salad designed to run down the clock. I nearly nodded off the second he started name-dropping the “carbon border adjustment mechanism”. 😴😂 Sophy deserves a medal for not yelling “Just answer the bloody question!” on live TV. 😂

🤷‍♂️ Hamish Falconer just subjected Sophy Ridge (and the entire country) to the most empty, circular, meaning-free waffle I’ve heard in years, leaving her and everyone watching totally baffled. Sophy asks a dead-simple question about the man now in charge of the Brexit “reset” talks: “How are you going to be approaching it? Is it a reset moment? Are you going to be doing it differently from Nick Thomas-Symonds?” Falconer’s reply? A masterclass in saying absolutely nothing: “Nick and the previous prime minister did really important work to help reset relations and I want to consolidate some of the work. But we also need to see if we can go further. The world has changed quite dramatically. The threats have changed dramatically. Threats in Eastern Europe, economic threats, disinformation threats and I want to look at those issues in the round.” Sophy, visibly baffled: “So what does that mean? Is there going to be a reset or not?” He drones on again: “We have already had a reset. We have got to consolidate some of the progress that has been made…” Sophy cuts him off, still lost: “Consolidate? I actually don’t understand what that means?” He tries again with more of the same meaningless sludge, blabbing on and on but still doesn’t answer the question. Sophy’s final verdict after enduring it: “It sounds like pretty much the same then. It doesn’t sound any different.” 😂 She’s right. Not a single concrete answer on whether he’s changing course, what “going further” actually looks like, or how any of this relates to the EU. Just endless “consolidate… in the round… threats have changed” word salad designed to run down the clock. I nearly nodded off the second he started name-dropping the “carbon border adjustment mechanism”. 😴😂 Sophy deserves a medal for not yelling “Just answer the bloody question!” on live TV. 😂

J Stewart

349,026 次观看 • 22 天前

THIS was a Comedy Central special lmfaoooo . They can take this R&B Comedy show on the road and call it “Two T’s in a Pod” sponsored by A T&T cause they both play too much . I haven’t seen a VERZUZ this funny since Omarion vs Mario 😭 “That Turtleneck” 😭😭😭😭 But Tyrese got jumped 😂 he only brought out Chingy . Tank brought out LeToya Luckett , Jamie Foxx , Trey Songz , & would’ve brought out Pleasure P & Omarion if their flights weren’t messed up because he start using his writing credits (which is valid in a verzuz 🤷🏾‍♂️). He used Aaliyah , Marques Houston, and more 😂 If I was Tyrese , I would’ve brought out the Fast & Furious cast : “now introducing Ludacris” lmfaooooo jk jk . The way Tyrese packed Trey Songz up off that stage like somebody at a funeral that goes over there 2 minutes had me in tears 😂😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 I was waiting on Jamie Foxx to say “and I be yelling out Gang Gang, do you Gangbang” 😭 yall know that’s his song But yea it started to be Tyrese solo songs vs 72 other people songs lmao . Tank should’ve went against Ne-Yo(he already did one), somebody who has solo hits and a crazy pen so it could’ve been equal but Tyrese still held it down by himself . Smoking a cigarette while singing tho is 💆🏾‍♂️😂 But also Tank made me mad cause you bringing out all these people and left out some of your BEST songs 🙄 where is Emergency , Celebration , Heartbreaker , Bday 🍅 Tyrese left some good songs out too but did majority of his . But who yall got ? Tyrese or Tank ? Let’s talk in the comments 😭 #tyrese #tank #verzuz #isaiahjaay

THIS was a Comedy Central special lmfaoooo . They can take this R&B Comedy show on the road and call it “Two T’s in a Pod” sponsored by A T&T cause they both play too much . I haven’t seen a VERZUZ this funny since Omarion vs Mario 😭 “That Turtleneck” 😭😭😭😭 But Tyrese got jumped 😂 he only brought out Chingy . Tank brought out LeToya Luckett , Jamie Foxx , Trey Songz , & would’ve brought out Pleasure P & Omarion if their flights weren’t messed up because he start using his writing credits (which is valid in a verzuz 🤷🏾‍♂️). He used Aaliyah , Marques Houston, and more 😂 If I was Tyrese , I would’ve brought out the Fast & Furious cast : “now introducing Ludacris” lmfaooooo jk jk . The way Tyrese packed Trey Songz up off that stage like somebody at a funeral that goes over there 2 minutes had me in tears 😂😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 I was waiting on Jamie Foxx to say “and I be yelling out Gang Gang, do you Gangbang” 😭 yall know that’s his song But yea it started to be Tyrese solo songs vs 72 other people songs lmao . Tank should’ve went against Ne-Yo(he already did one), somebody who has solo hits and a crazy pen so it could’ve been equal but Tyrese still held it down by himself . Smoking a cigarette while singing tho is 💆🏾‍♂️😂 But also Tank made me mad cause you bringing out all these people and left out some of your BEST songs 🙄 where is Emergency , Celebration , Heartbreaker , Bday 🍅 Tyrese left some good songs out too but did majority of his . But who yall got ? Tyrese or Tank ? Let’s talk in the comments 😭 #tyrese #tank #verzuz #isaiahjaay

3/12 🎈

39,027 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 WOW - Philly kids are now EMBRACING the 2nd Amendment by OPEN CARRYING on the streets of Crime-Riddled Philadelphia PA. The 18 year old, Justin Suarez, is seen open carrying a standard AR build which he calls an "m16." When asked about it he cites the fact that he has "seen a lot of violence" in the Kensington area of Philly and essentially is looking to defend himself. You can even see police officers walking by behind the young man holding the rifle and not batting an eye. You were always allowed to open carry WITHOUT a Permit in the rest of the state of Pennsylvania, but as of 2025 a PA Supreme Court decision NULLIFIED a special ordinance within Philadelphia city limits BANNING your right to self-defense. With this change, ANYONE who is legally allowed to own a firearm in the state of Pennsylvania (INCLUDING PHILADELPHIA) can lawfully open carry. While this young man seems like he has a lot to learn and a lot of TRAINING to do, I FULLY support his right to defend himself! The kid in the yellow is a little SUS tho! 😂 The REAL Question is, Will this INCREASE or DECREASE Crime in Philadelphia PA? Keep Fighting 🇺🇸 Video from leftlane0vaz, painthebuilding, da_fearless_philadelphia on IG

🚨 WOW - Philly kids are now EMBRACING the 2nd Amendment by OPEN CARRYING on the streets of Crime-Riddled Philadelphia PA. The 18 year old, Justin Suarez, is seen open carrying a standard AR build which he calls an "m16." When asked about it he cites the fact that he has "seen a lot of violence" in the Kensington area of Philly and essentially is looking to defend himself. You can even see police officers walking by behind the young man holding the rifle and not batting an eye. You were always allowed to open carry WITHOUT a Permit in the rest of the state of Pennsylvania, but as of 2025 a PA Supreme Court decision NULLIFIED a special ordinance within Philadelphia city limits BANNING your right to self-defense. With this change, ANYONE who is legally allowed to own a firearm in the state of Pennsylvania (INCLUDING PHILADELPHIA) can lawfully open carry. While this young man seems like he has a lot to learn and a lot of TRAINING to do, I FULLY support his right to defend himself! The kid in the yellow is a little SUS tho! 😂 The REAL Question is, Will this INCREASE or DECREASE Crime in Philadelphia PA? Keep Fighting 🇺🇸 Video from leftlane0vaz, painthebuilding, da_fearless_philadelphia on IG

Jay Costa

31,658 次观看 • 3 个月前

🟥 😂😂😂 The desperation is SHOWING. This video from Conservative MP and Gentle Lady from Oklahoma-Calgary, Michelle Rempel Garner, is supposed to make Mark Carney look weak. Instead, it accidentally makes the STRONGEST case for his approach to the Canada–U.S. relationship: Canada should negotiate, but Canada should never accept a bad deal just so we can claim a deal was signed. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Rempel-Garner of Oklahoma fundamentally misunderstands what negotiation is. 😌 Canada has repeatedly made calculated moves to keep talks alive while protecting our leverage and Canadian interests. The government itself has been explicit that negotiations must be guided by what is best for Canadian workers and businesses. ✅ Then comes the truly ironic part: she reminds everyone that Carney promised Canadians, “We will get an even better deal.” 🙂 EXACTLY. That means he doesn't have to take the first deal Trump puts on the table. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Carney has said plainly that Canada already has a strong position because most of our trade remains tariff-free, and that the objective is to negotiate something better. And that's precisely what seems to frustrate the Conservatives. They desperately want Canadians to believe that every concession is weakness, every negotiation is capitulation, and every unresolved issue is proof of failure. But international trade negotiations don't work that way. Sometimes you make a tactical concession to keep negotiations moving. Sometimes you hold your ground. And sometimes the smartest move is to walk away from a bad deal. 🙅🏻‍♂️ Ironically, this video reminds Canadians of the promise Carney ACTUALLY made: he won't settle for a deal merely for the sake of saying there is a deal. He intends to get a better one. If the Conservatives are reduced to cherry-picking headlines and trying to manufacture outrage from the very evidence that demonstrates Canada is negotiating strategically, they're not exposing Carney's weakness. They're exposing their own desperation. 😌 Canadians deserve a government that knows the difference between making a deal and making a good deal. That’s why they voted for Mark Carney. 🍁

🟥 😂😂😂 The desperation is SHOWING. This video from Conservative MP and Gentle Lady from Oklahoma-Calgary, Michelle Rempel Garner, is supposed to make Mark Carney look weak. Instead, it accidentally makes the STRONGEST case for his approach to the Canada–U.S. relationship: Canada should negotiate, but Canada should never accept a bad deal just so we can claim a deal was signed. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Rempel-Garner of Oklahoma fundamentally misunderstands what negotiation is. 😌 Canada has repeatedly made calculated moves to keep talks alive while protecting our leverage and Canadian interests. The government itself has been explicit that negotiations must be guided by what is best for Canadian workers and businesses. ✅ Then comes the truly ironic part: she reminds everyone that Carney promised Canadians, “We will get an even better deal.” 🙂 EXACTLY. That means he doesn't have to take the first deal Trump puts on the table. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Carney has said plainly that Canada already has a strong position because most of our trade remains tariff-free, and that the objective is to negotiate something better. And that's precisely what seems to frustrate the Conservatives. They desperately want Canadians to believe that every concession is weakness, every negotiation is capitulation, and every unresolved issue is proof of failure. But international trade negotiations don't work that way. Sometimes you make a tactical concession to keep negotiations moving. Sometimes you hold your ground. And sometimes the smartest move is to walk away from a bad deal. 🙅🏻‍♂️ Ironically, this video reminds Canadians of the promise Carney ACTUALLY made: he won't settle for a deal merely for the sake of saying there is a deal. He intends to get a better one. If the Conservatives are reduced to cherry-picking headlines and trying to manufacture outrage from the very evidence that demonstrates Canada is negotiating strategically, they're not exposing Carney's weakness. They're exposing their own desperation. 😌 Canadians deserve a government that knows the difference between making a deal and making a good deal. That’s why they voted for Mark Carney. 🍁

Fun Tom 🇨🇦 💂

10,738 次观看 • 3 天前

#BREAKING: Psaki: “After Fox News played all 27 minutes of Donald J. Trump’s speech, and they did, letting him make all his outrageous allegations, they quickly brought on a reporter to give this fun little disclaimer. [‘Fox News has not seen that evidence yet is not in a position to evaluate the accuracy of the president’s statements and claims at this time.’]…now, to add insult to injury Fox didn’t even keep talking about the speech after that. That’s pretty much it. They changed the subject almost immediately. So much for Trump’s big splashy subject-changing, narrative-changing speech. And then this morning, Trump’s personal favorite show FOX & Friends IGNORED his speech ENTIRELY. Now, Fox and Friends is a THREE HOUR long show. They have A LOT of time for segments on there. They had time this morning for segments about the World Cup, and country music star Toby Keith, and the dating app Hinge, and WNBA star Caitlin Clark, and the Fast and Furious franchise…but they didn’t have time for a segment about Trump’s presidential address. Now, that one’s gonna kind of sting. Who knows what he was doing, flipping through the channel maybe throwing remotes? We don’t know.” 😂😳

#BREAKING: Psaki: “After Fox News played all 27 minutes of Donald J. Trump’s speech, and they did, letting him make all his outrageous allegations, they quickly brought on a reporter to give this fun little disclaimer. [‘Fox News has not seen that evidence yet is not in a position to evaluate the accuracy of the president’s statements and claims at this time.’]…now, to add insult to injury Fox didn’t even keep talking about the speech after that. That’s pretty much it. They changed the subject almost immediately. So much for Trump’s big splashy subject-changing, narrative-changing speech. And then this morning, Trump’s personal favorite show FOX & Friends IGNORED his speech ENTIRELY. Now, Fox and Friends is a THREE HOUR long show. They have A LOT of time for segments on there. They had time this morning for segments about the World Cup, and country music star Toby Keith, and the dating app Hinge, and WNBA star Caitlin Clark, and the Fast and Furious franchise…but they didn’t have time for a segment about Trump’s presidential address. Now, that one’s gonna kind of sting. Who knows what he was doing, flipping through the channel maybe throwing remotes? We don’t know.” 😂😳

Emoluments Clause

466,091 次观看 • 1 个月前

Federal officials doubted truth of Kamloops mass graves claim What if I told you that a major federal agency quietly questioned one of the most explosive claims in recent Canadian memory — but said nothing publicly, because the prime minister had already turned it into a national tragedy? That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s Parks Canada. Internal records obtained by Blacklock's Reporter now reveal that as early as 2023, Parks Canada officials were privately skeptical of the headline-grabbing claim that 215 children’s remains had been discovered in unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. The agency’s own archaeologists and historians concluded: there was no physical evidence. Not “insufficient evidence.” No evidence at all. But publicly? Silence. Instead, the agency lowered flags, sent tearful internal emails, and parroted the political line. One exec said he was “in shambles” after reading about it in The Guardian — not a forensic report, mind you, The Guardian. Another manager cancelled a staff meeting as an act of mourning. And this blind allegiance wasn’t limited to bureaucrats. Legacy media — supposed watchdogs of democracy — became the lapdogs of the narrative. CTV, for instance, is still spreading the misinformation. A story from May 28, 2021, features a headline that reads: "Remains of 215 children discovered on site of former residential school." That’s false. Full stop. There has been no discovery of remains, not a single confirmed body. In Kamloops, a tooth was later found to be from an animal. A rib bone? Undetermined. And despite $12.1 million in federal funds being handed to the band for excavation and forensic analysis, no excavation ever occurred. And yet, the national broadcaster didn’t just echo the myth — they weaponized it against anyone asking for proof and honesty. During the 2025 federal leaders’ debate, Rebel News' own Drea Humphrey asked now former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh a tough, necessary question: why hasn’t he condemned the arson attacks against Christian churches — a wave of hate crimes that followed the unproven Kamloops claim? Rather than answer, Singh smeared Rebel News as purveyors of misinformation — a charge he’s repeated often, never substantiated. But what happened next was even worse. CBC’s Rosemary Barton went on national television and slandered Drea directly, claiming her question was “woven with some truth and some things that weren’t true,” and falsely declared: "Yes, there have been remains of Indigenous children found." That wasn’t commentary. That was state-funded defamation. Barton never apologized. When Drea tried to approach her to correct the record, Barton refused to speak to her. And while the CBC quietly posted a retraction — tucked away in a dusty corner of their “Corrections and Clarifications” page — it violated CBC’s own Journalistic Standards and Practices. Their own policy states that corrections should be made in the same format and audience as the original error. In this case? A national broadcast. Yet the retraction didn’t air. Barton never took responsibility. Because the truth doesn’t matter when you’re a regime journalist. The goal isn’t informing the public — it’s protecting the narrative. Parks Canada knew the grave claims didn’t hold up. But they stayed quiet while Trudeau visited Kamloops “to pay (his) respects to the graves,” and lowered the Peace Tower flag for five straight months. Mainstream media amplified it. Politicians exploited it. And journalists who challenged it — like Drea — were vilified for doing their jobs. This isn’t about denying the painful legacy of residential schools. It’s about refusing to let the government — and its media arm — turn speculation into dogma. When emotion overrides evidence, when no one dares question the story because they’re afraid of being labelled a heretic, you don’t get truth. You get mythology. And that mythology is now carved into public policy, enshrined on historic plaques, and weaponized against anyone who dares to ask: Where are the bodies? REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Federal officials doubted truth of Kamloops mass graves claim What if I told you that a major federal agency quietly questioned one of the most explosive claims in recent Canadian memory — but said nothing publicly, because the prime minister had already turned it into a national tragedy? That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s Parks Canada. Internal records obtained by Blacklock's Reporter now reveal that as early as 2023, Parks Canada officials were privately skeptical of the headline-grabbing claim that 215 children’s remains had been discovered in unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. The agency’s own archaeologists and historians concluded: there was no physical evidence. Not “insufficient evidence.” No evidence at all. But publicly? Silence. Instead, the agency lowered flags, sent tearful internal emails, and parroted the political line. One exec said he was “in shambles” after reading about it in The Guardian — not a forensic report, mind you, The Guardian. Another manager cancelled a staff meeting as an act of mourning. And this blind allegiance wasn’t limited to bureaucrats. Legacy media — supposed watchdogs of democracy — became the lapdogs of the narrative. CTV, for instance, is still spreading the misinformation. A story from May 28, 2021, features a headline that reads: "Remains of 215 children discovered on site of former residential school." That’s false. Full stop. There has been no discovery of remains, not a single confirmed body. In Kamloops, a tooth was later found to be from an animal. A rib bone? Undetermined. And despite $12.1 million in federal funds being handed to the band for excavation and forensic analysis, no excavation ever occurred. And yet, the national broadcaster didn’t just echo the myth — they weaponized it against anyone asking for proof and honesty. During the 2025 federal leaders’ debate, Rebel News' own Drea Humphrey asked now former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh a tough, necessary question: why hasn’t he condemned the arson attacks against Christian churches — a wave of hate crimes that followed the unproven Kamloops claim? Rather than answer, Singh smeared Rebel News as purveyors of misinformation — a charge he’s repeated often, never substantiated. But what happened next was even worse. CBC’s Rosemary Barton went on national television and slandered Drea directly, claiming her question was “woven with some truth and some things that weren’t true,” and falsely declared: "Yes, there have been remains of Indigenous children found." That wasn’t commentary. That was state-funded defamation. Barton never apologized. When Drea tried to approach her to correct the record, Barton refused to speak to her. And while the CBC quietly posted a retraction — tucked away in a dusty corner of their “Corrections and Clarifications” page — it violated CBC’s own Journalistic Standards and Practices. Their own policy states that corrections should be made in the same format and audience as the original error. In this case? A national broadcast. Yet the retraction didn’t air. Barton never took responsibility. Because the truth doesn’t matter when you’re a regime journalist. The goal isn’t informing the public — it’s protecting the narrative. Parks Canada knew the grave claims didn’t hold up. But they stayed quiet while Trudeau visited Kamloops “to pay (his) respects to the graves,” and lowered the Peace Tower flag for five straight months. Mainstream media amplified it. Politicians exploited it. And journalists who challenged it — like Drea — were vilified for doing their jobs. This isn’t about denying the painful legacy of residential schools. It’s about refusing to let the government — and its media arm — turn speculation into dogma. When emotion overrides evidence, when no one dares question the story because they’re afraid of being labelled a heretic, you don’t get truth. You get mythology. And that mythology is now carved into public policy, enshrined on historic plaques, and weaponized against anyone who dares to ask: Where are the bodies? REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Rebel News

22,776 次观看 • 1 年前

The evidence is now beyond dispute. The Prime Minister lied to Parliament about the grooming gang inquiry. Baroness Louise Casey never ruled out a judge to lead the Rape Gang Inquiry. Nigel Farage has now confirmed exactly what we uncovered and yet, the media still remains silent. This isn’t just another scandal. It’s the moment truth itself is being tested inside Parliament. If this lie goes unchallenged, it becomes official. Any MP can demand the Prime Minister correct the record. They can use one or more of the four formal routes open to Parliament: - Table a written or oral question asking the Prime Minister to correct his false claim. - Raise a Point of Order after PMQs citing Casey’s actual evidence. - Request a referral to the Committee of Privileges to investigate whether Parliament was misled. - Ask the Home Affairs Select Committee to recall Baroness Casey or Jess Phillips to confirm the truth on record. When a Prime Minister lies to Parliament, he lies to the people. When that lie protects those responsible for the industrial-scale rape of children, it becomes something darker. It becomes a betrayal of justice itself. There can be no compromise on this. Either Parliament forces Keir Starmer to correct the record, or it becomes complicit in the cover-up. It is no more complicated than this. Raja 🙏 _________ My name is Raja Miah. It’s been seven years since I began exposing how politicians protected the rape gangs. In that time; - the police have tried and failed to prosecute me - Politicians have tried and failed to silence me - The mainstream media has smeared me, and when that failed to stop the truth from coming out, now blacklisted me - Pakistani gangsters and Islamists have openly called for my murder. And yet; I’m still here. Still speaking. Still fighting for the truth. Everything I publish is shared for free. There are no paywalls. No corporate sponsors. No hidden backers. If my work has ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if it’s ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. The fight is far from over. 👉 If you can afford to do so, just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most, but everything to help keep this work alive. Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 – Raja 🙏

The evidence is now beyond dispute. The Prime Minister lied to Parliament about the grooming gang inquiry. Baroness Louise Casey never ruled out a judge to lead the Rape Gang Inquiry. Nigel Farage has now confirmed exactly what we uncovered and yet, the media still remains silent. This isn’t just another scandal. It’s the moment truth itself is being tested inside Parliament. If this lie goes unchallenged, it becomes official. Any MP can demand the Prime Minister correct the record. They can use one or more of the four formal routes open to Parliament: - Table a written or oral question asking the Prime Minister to correct his false claim. - Raise a Point of Order after PMQs citing Casey’s actual evidence. - Request a referral to the Committee of Privileges to investigate whether Parliament was misled. - Ask the Home Affairs Select Committee to recall Baroness Casey or Jess Phillips to confirm the truth on record. When a Prime Minister lies to Parliament, he lies to the people. When that lie protects those responsible for the industrial-scale rape of children, it becomes something darker. It becomes a betrayal of justice itself. There can be no compromise on this. Either Parliament forces Keir Starmer to correct the record, or it becomes complicit in the cover-up. It is no more complicated than this. Raja 🙏 _________ My name is Raja Miah. It’s been seven years since I began exposing how politicians protected the rape gangs. In that time; - the police have tried and failed to prosecute me - Politicians have tried and failed to silence me - The mainstream media has smeared me, and when that failed to stop the truth from coming out, now blacklisted me - Pakistani gangsters and Islamists have openly called for my murder. And yet; I’m still here. Still speaking. Still fighting for the truth. Everything I publish is shared for free. There are no paywalls. No corporate sponsors. No hidden backers. If my work has ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if it’s ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. The fight is far from over. 👉 If you can afford to do so, just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most, but everything to help keep this work alive. Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 – Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

88,689 次观看 • 9 个月前

Mark Kelly is basically saying the quiet part out loud: the big rupture is not that Europe suddenly changed its values, or that democracies woke up and decided alliances are boring. The rupture is that the United States, under Donald Trump, started vandalising the very system that overwhelmingly benefited America for decades. And that matters, because people keep framing this like “the world is different now.” Sure, Russia is still doing what it has always done when it thinks it can get away with it: attacking neighbours, lying about it, and daring the West to blink. That is not some new era. That is the same ugly playbook with different dates. What is genuinely new is Washington choosing unpredictability as a brand, and treating allies like optional subscriptions. That is why Kelly’s “take generations” line hits. Trust is slow to build and ridiculously fast to destroy, especially when the destruction is deliberate and public. So yes, the core point stands: Trump is the variable. The rest of the democratic world is largely trying to keep the old logic alive, rules, alliances, deterrence, support for Ukraine, while also scrambling to build a backup plan because the US is acting like a flaky partner. That is exactly the vibe coming out of Munich Security Conference right now: Europe talking more openly about self reliance because it no longer knows what America will do next. If you want the blunt version: Russia is a brutal, corrupt aggressor. But Trump is the one handing them the strategic gift, by turning allied unity into a question mark. That is why this feels like the end of an era. Not because the world suddenly stopped believing in alliances, but because the country that built the alliance system is now flirting with burning it down. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

686,484 次观看 • 6 个月前

Najam Sethi has little credibility left, having long blurred the line between political commentary and power brokering within Pakistan’s ruling ecosystem. It was telling that he was among the first to brand the Pahalgam massacre of 24 Hindus a false flag. He is now overreading S. Jaishankar shaking hands with Pakistan National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq on the sidelines of Khaleda Zia’s funeral in Dhaka. A basic diplomatic courtesy at a funeral is being spun as rapprochement. Sethi doesn’t stop at this amateur speculation, but goes a step ahead, claiming India is fooling the world, pretending to want peace while planning a military attack on Pakistan. Facts remain unchanged. The Indus Waters Treaty remains in abeyance. India has made no concession on terrorism. Sethi’s religious bigotry is further laid bare when he invokes Lord Shiva as a metaphor for deception, dragging a Hindu deity into his crude political smear. This is the real face of Pakistan’s so-called liberal elite. The same man cries about visas. India owes none to a habitual liar and bigot. What makes Najam Sethi’s performance more than just shrill is the pattern. After Pakistan’s Jaffar Express security failure, Sethi rushed in to blame India, without evidence, almost as a reflex. He then went on to warn of intensified jihadist activity in Jammu and Kashmir. Days later, Pahalgam happened. Even after the US designated TRF and the attack was globally recognised as a Lashkar operation, Sethi stuck to the false-flag line. He is now again pre-emptively predicting another false flag, insisting India will stage an attack to justify military action against Pakistan. This is not intuition, and it is certainly not analysis. It is narrative management for something worse about to come. When someone repeatedly predicts terror and then explains it away in advance, the question is not why he is wrong, but why he is so sure.

Sonam Mahajan

77,625 次观看 • 7 个月前

Not 100% accurate 💬: “You got a devil tattoo?” 🖤: “Yes, I’ve actually always liked tattoos. My dad was covered in them.” 💬: “Your dad is a gangster!?” 😂 🖤: “No, he has dragon tattoos and things like that. Black dragons. I’ve seen them since I was a kid. So I ended up liking them too and got interested in them. But my mom is the complete opposite.” 💬: “Then what tattoos does your mom have? This one is a dragon, this one is a cat.” 🖤: “No, no, my mom is super clean-cut and doesn’t like tattoos at all. I’ve been hearing her scold my dad about them ever since I was a little kid. And now, in my generation, I’m still getting scolded too. Like when I got my first tattoo…” 💬: “Just asking for fun, did your mom say anything?” 🖤: “Oh wow, what do you think?” 😭😂 💬: “Sorry, Mom. Let me apologize on his behalf.” 💬: “What did you get tattooed? A devil?” 🖤: “I also have tattoos lower down. I’m planning for that whole area to be devil-themed. I have Lucifer on the right side. No one will ever see that one because it’s placed very high up. And on the left side there’s a devil face, with horns.” 💬: “So today you’re going to show your tattoos on the program?” 👀😂 🖤: “Want to see?” starts pretending to take his pants off 😂 🤍: “Heyyy! Calm down! Oiiii! This guy is always ready to show off!” 😭😂 //Not Perth being ready to show the tattoo before the question was even finished. 😭🤣 PERTHSANTA TALK WITH KATANYU #KATANYUTONIGHTxPerthSanta

Not 100% accurate 💬: “You got a devil tattoo?” 🖤: “Yes, I’ve actually always liked tattoos. My dad was covered in them.” 💬: “Your dad is a gangster!?” 😂 🖤: “No, he has dragon tattoos and things like that. Black dragons. I’ve seen them since I was a kid. So I ended up liking them too and got interested in them. But my mom is the complete opposite.” 💬: “Then what tattoos does your mom have? This one is a dragon, this one is a cat.” 🖤: “No, no, my mom is super clean-cut and doesn’t like tattoos at all. I’ve been hearing her scold my dad about them ever since I was a little kid. And now, in my generation, I’m still getting scolded too. Like when I got my first tattoo…” 💬: “Just asking for fun, did your mom say anything?” 🖤: “Oh wow, what do you think?” 😭😂 💬: “Sorry, Mom. Let me apologize on his behalf.” 💬: “What did you get tattooed? A devil?” 🖤: “I also have tattoos lower down. I’m planning for that whole area to be devil-themed. I have Lucifer on the right side. No one will ever see that one because it’s placed very high up. And on the left side there’s a devil face, with horns.” 💬: “So today you’re going to show your tattoos on the program?” 👀😂 🖤: “Want to see?” starts pretending to take his pants off 😂 🤍: “Heyyy! Calm down! Oiiii! This guy is always ready to show off!” 😭😂 //Not Perth being ready to show the tattoo before the question was even finished. 😭🤣 PERTHSANTA TALK WITH KATANYU #KATANYUTONIGHTxPerthSanta

ɾαɱσɳα 🖤🤍⁀➴⛅️

24,051 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨New: Sir Alex Ferguson on the Messi, Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo GOAT debate: • Interviewer: Sir Alex, the debate never ends — Messi, Pelé, Maradona, Ronaldo. Who is the greatest of all time for you? 🗣️Ferguson: “I’ve been asked this question more times than I can count over the years, and for a long time I refused to give a straight answer because the debate was still open. It isn’t open anymore. Messi’s World Cup in 2022 was the final piece. Before that tournament he already had everything else, the Champions Leagues, the league titles in different countries, the Ballons d’Or, the individual brilliance that no one could match. The only thing missing was the World Cup. He went and got it. When a player completes the full set like that, the conversation changes. He has now completed football. Every major trophy, every individual award, every level of the game. That closes the debate for me. Because of that completion, Messi sits clearly above Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo. I’m not saying the other three weren’t great. Of course they were. But the ledger is now complete for Messi in a way it never was for the others, and that has to count. Now, people will jump on the fact that Cristiano was my player. He was. He is still my boy in many ways. I have huge affection and respect for him, the hunger, the work rate, the way he rebuilt himself season after season. That part is emotional for me. But the ranking itself is no longer emotional. It’s factual. You separate the personal from the professional when the evidence is this clear. Let’s be honest about what Cristiano is. He is the more adaptable, all-round player. Different leagues, different systems, different styles of play. He could score with either foot, with his head, from distance, from six yards. He could lead a dressing room, he could carry a team on pure willpower, and he stayed at the highest level for an absurd length of time. No serious person denies any of that. Physical dominance, leadership, versatility — he has those qualities in abundance. But adaptable is not the same as greatest. In pure footballing terms — the genius of the first touch, the vision, the consistency at the absolute peak for over a decade, and now the complete trophy case — Messi is on another level. Ronaldo is not close in that specific sense. One is an extraordinary athlete and competitor who maximised every ounce of his talent. The other is simply a better footballer. That’s the distinction. Pele and Maradona were gods of their eras, no question. But the modern game is harder, deeper, and more athletic. The athletic demands, the tactical organisation, the quality of opposition week after week, it’s a different beast. Messi dominated a far stronger era for longer than either of them managed. That has to be recognised. I’m not sentimental about this. Sentiment is for fans and for the media. When you strip it back to what actually happened on the pitch and in the trophy cabinet, the answer is clear. Cristiano is an extraordinary athlete and competitor. Messi is just a better footballer. You can love Ronaldo more. You can respect him more. You can prefer his story, his personality, his work ethic. All of that is fair. What you cannot do is put him above Messi anymore. The ledger is closed.” Cristiano is an all-time great. Messi is the greatest. That’s just how it is now.”

🚨New: Sir Alex Ferguson on the Messi, Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo GOAT debate: • Interviewer: Sir Alex, the debate never ends — Messi, Pelé, Maradona, Ronaldo. Who is the greatest of all time for you? 🗣️Ferguson: “I’ve been asked this question more times than I can count over the years, and for a long time I refused to give a straight answer because the debate was still open. It isn’t open anymore. Messi’s World Cup in 2022 was the final piece. Before that tournament he already had everything else, the Champions Leagues, the league titles in different countries, the Ballons d’Or, the individual brilliance that no one could match. The only thing missing was the World Cup. He went and got it. When a player completes the full set like that, the conversation changes. He has now completed football. Every major trophy, every individual award, every level of the game. That closes the debate for me. Because of that completion, Messi sits clearly above Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo. I’m not saying the other three weren’t great. Of course they were. But the ledger is now complete for Messi in a way it never was for the others, and that has to count. Now, people will jump on the fact that Cristiano was my player. He was. He is still my boy in many ways. I have huge affection and respect for him, the hunger, the work rate, the way he rebuilt himself season after season. That part is emotional for me. But the ranking itself is no longer emotional. It’s factual. You separate the personal from the professional when the evidence is this clear. Let’s be honest about what Cristiano is. He is the more adaptable, all-round player. Different leagues, different systems, different styles of play. He could score with either foot, with his head, from distance, from six yards. He could lead a dressing room, he could carry a team on pure willpower, and he stayed at the highest level for an absurd length of time. No serious person denies any of that. Physical dominance, leadership, versatility — he has those qualities in abundance. But adaptable is not the same as greatest. In pure footballing terms — the genius of the first touch, the vision, the consistency at the absolute peak for over a decade, and now the complete trophy case — Messi is on another level. Ronaldo is not close in that specific sense. One is an extraordinary athlete and competitor who maximised every ounce of his talent. The other is simply a better footballer. That’s the distinction. Pele and Maradona were gods of their eras, no question. But the modern game is harder, deeper, and more athletic. The athletic demands, the tactical organisation, the quality of opposition week after week, it’s a different beast. Messi dominated a far stronger era for longer than either of them managed. That has to be recognised. I’m not sentimental about this. Sentiment is for fans and for the media. When you strip it back to what actually happened on the pitch and in the trophy cabinet, the answer is clear. Cristiano is an extraordinary athlete and competitor. Messi is just a better footballer. You can love Ronaldo more. You can respect him more. You can prefer his story, his personality, his work ethic. All of that is fair. What you cannot do is put him above Messi anymore. The ledger is closed.” Cristiano is an all-time great. Messi is the greatest. That’s just how it is now.”

Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚

33,717 次观看 • 25 天前

🚨🚨🚨 Trigger Warning: There is a lot of FUD thrown at me in this Tesla FSD/Uber video about Tesla and Tesla FSD. I attempted to swat all of it away, and believe I did so, but I'm sure I will get comments about how I should have said this or that. So let me say ahead of time, thank you so much for your amazingly helpful comment😂 ------------------------------------------------------------ Tesla FSD 14.1.4 Ubers a Prius owner for his first experience in a Tesla and with FSD. This guy started out the drive throwing a ton of FUD at me for the first 4-5 minutes, but the funniest part of the video is the 2nd half of it, where you can literally hear the cognitive dissonance about FSD that has been comfortably planted in his head, not have any clue where to go when confronted with the reality of what he is experiencing right then, first hand. And just FYI, don't go too hard on this guy, he gave me a great rating and a nice tip. He seemed like a good dude, he's just been given bad data, and now he's got better data, the kind he experienced himself versus reading stuff online.

🚨🚨🚨 Trigger Warning: There is a lot of FUD thrown at me in this Tesla FSD/Uber video about Tesla and Tesla FSD. I attempted to swat all of it away, and believe I did so, but I'm sure I will get comments about how I should have said this or that. So let me say ahead of time, thank you so much for your amazingly helpful comment😂 ------------------------------------------------------------ Tesla FSD 14.1.4 Ubers a Prius owner for his first experience in a Tesla and with FSD. This guy started out the drive throwing a ton of FUD at me for the first 4-5 minutes, but the funniest part of the video is the 2nd half of it, where you can literally hear the cognitive dissonance about FSD that has been comfortably planted in his head, not have any clue where to go when confronted with the reality of what he is experiencing right then, first hand. And just FYI, don't go too hard on this guy, he gave me a great rating and a nice tip. He seemed like a good dude, he's just been given bad data, and now he's got better data, the kind he experienced himself versus reading stuff online.

JC Christopher

14,237 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk Just Admitted It Herself — “Everyone Thought I Was a Little Boy” 🤯 Right after Candace exposed the Looking Glass School yearbooks where Erika is dressed as a boy… Erika herself drops this on camera: “I played basketball since I was five. Super tomboy… didn’t like dresses. Everyone thought I was a little boy because I wore Jordans… People at the grocery store would say ‘Hey Sonny, you gotta take those groceries off your mom’… and I was like ‘Ah yes, haha’ 😂” She even says they chopped her hair “bam bam straight across” because it was too knotty. This is not “just a tomboy phase.” This is a woman openly admitting she was routinely mistaken for a boy, answered to “Sonny”, and went along with it. Combined with the yearbook photos from the elite “Looking Glass” school where she’s literally dressed as a boy… The circumstantial evidence is stacking up fast. Now I have to give credit where it's due guys... The one and only Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton actually dropped this clip himself. Gary for the win again. Keep helping our side, king 😂 The more they try to shut Candace down, the more receipts keep falling out. Is Erika really who she says she is? Has the biggest lie been hiding in plain sight this whole time? Part 1 already has the internet in flames. This follow-up clip is gasoline. Watch it. Share it. The truth is coming whether they like it or not. Drop 🔥 if your mind is blown RT this immediately — this one needs to go everywhere Tag Candace Owens — we are with you!! They wanted silence. They’re getting the opposite. Let’s keep going. 🚀

🚨 FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk Just Admitted It Herself — “Everyone Thought I Was a Little Boy” 🤯 Right after Candace exposed the Looking Glass School yearbooks where Erika is dressed as a boy… Erika herself drops this on camera: “I played basketball since I was five. Super tomboy… didn’t like dresses. Everyone thought I was a little boy because I wore Jordans… People at the grocery store would say ‘Hey Sonny, you gotta take those groceries off your mom’… and I was like ‘Ah yes, haha’ 😂” She even says they chopped her hair “bam bam straight across” because it was too knotty. This is not “just a tomboy phase.” This is a woman openly admitting she was routinely mistaken for a boy, answered to “Sonny”, and went along with it. Combined with the yearbook photos from the elite “Looking Glass” school where she’s literally dressed as a boy… The circumstantial evidence is stacking up fast. Now I have to give credit where it's due guys... The one and only Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton actually dropped this clip himself. Gary for the win again. Keep helping our side, king 😂 The more they try to shut Candace down, the more receipts keep falling out. Is Erika really who she says she is? Has the biggest lie been hiding in plain sight this whole time? Part 1 already has the internet in flames. This follow-up clip is gasoline. Watch it. Share it. The truth is coming whether they like it or not. Drop 🔥 if your mind is blown RT this immediately — this one needs to go everywhere Tag Candace Owens — we are with you!! They wanted silence. They’re getting the opposite. Let’s keep going. 🚀

Project Constitution

225,130 次观看 • 5 个月前