Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“When the tobacco industry introduced electronic cigarettes and vaping, one narrative they tried to really sell is that it is part of harm reduction. It’s not true. It actually is a trap. Kids are being recruited at early age – 10, 11,12 to do vaping and (use) e-cigarettes because...

KulikovUNIATF's profile picture

Dr Alexey Kulikov

63,153 subscribers

51,595 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"It’s a rollercoaster of emotions" As a school nurse, Beth sees the toll vaping takes on her students and their #MentalHealth every day. Once hooked on nicotine, the effects hit hard when they don’t have it in their system. If someone you know is trying to quit vaping, be the support they need. #TobaccoExposed #CommitToQuit
1:23

"It’s a rollercoaster of emotions" As a school nurse, Beth sees the toll vaping takes on her students and their #MentalHealth every day. Once hooked on nicotine, the effects hit hard when they don’t have it in their system. If someone you know is trying to quit vaping, be the support they need. #TobaccoExposed #CommitToQuit

World Health Organization (WHO)

55,245 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Hollywood’s BAD HABIT is putting kids at risk again. Marc Siegel MD: “Teens think vaping is worse because we’ve been telling them that — so they’re going back to cigarettes. Nicotine in any form is dangerous, but tar is even more dangerous: 30% of cancers are tied to cigarettes. We had teen smoking down to 6%… I believe it’s coming back.” Get his book 👉
1:27

Hollywood’s BAD HABIT is putting kids at risk again. Marc Siegel MD: “Teens think vaping is worse because we’ve been telling them that — so they’re going back to cigarettes. Nicotine in any form is dangerous, but tar is even more dangerous: 30% of cancers are tied to cigarettes. We had teen smoking down to 6%… I believe it’s coming back.” Get his book 👉

Laura Ingraham

55,871 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Dr. Benjamin Bikman's lab just proved that vaping is worse than smoking for your health. Bikman and lung expert Paul Reynolds published multiple papers comparing cigarette smoke to the hyper-heated molecules from vaping. They measured two things: 1) Insulin resistance 2) Inflammatory damage to the airway The results: "Chemical for chemical, vaping caused more damage to the airway and greater insulin resistance than traditional cigarettes." Insulin resistance is the symptoms for almost all chronic diseases killing us, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's, even erectile dysfunction and infertility. An entire generation switched to vaping believing it was the safer option. Bikman's data suggests it may be the opposite. As Steven Bartlett responded: "That's horrifying." Bikman's reply: "It is. In part because of just how common it's become." — Dr. Benjamin Bikman (Benjamin Bikman) on Steven Bartlett's (@SteveBartlettSC) Diary of a CEO podcast PS. This account exists to share unconventional health insights every human needs to hear. If this post interests you, follow me for more - you won't want to miss what we've got scheduled out next.
0:46

Dr. Benjamin Bikman's lab just proved that vaping is worse than smoking for your health. Bikman and lung expert Paul Reynolds published multiple papers comparing cigarette smoke to the hyper-heated molecules from vaping. They measured two things: 1) Insulin resistance 2) Inflammatory damage to the airway The results: "Chemical for chemical, vaping caused more damage to the airway and greater insulin resistance than traditional cigarettes." Insulin resistance is the symptoms for almost all chronic diseases killing us, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's, even erectile dysfunction and infertility. An entire generation switched to vaping believing it was the safer option. Bikman's data suggests it may be the opposite. As Steven Bartlett responded: "That's horrifying." Bikman's reply: "It is. In part because of just how common it's become." — Dr. Benjamin Bikman (Benjamin Bikman) on Steven Bartlett's (@SteveBartlettSC) Diary of a CEO podcast PS. This account exists to share unconventional health insights every human needs to hear. If this post interests you, follow me for more - you won't want to miss what we've got scheduled out next.

Goku

14,591 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Andrew Huberman drops a nuanced truth bomb on nicotine in this 34-second clip: “Nicotine is neuroprotective… increases acetylcholine and dopamine and epinephrine, leads to heightened focus, improved memory, and can offset neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.” But he immediately shuts down any misinterpretation: “Smoking cigarettes is bad because it’s carcinogenic. There are about a thousand carcinogens in cigarettes. Vaping is bad because of the chemicals you’re inhaling.” Nicotine itself has real cognitive & neuroprotective benefits (science-backed), but the delivery method (smoke/vape) is the killer. Classic Huberman: Separates compound from context. No free pass for smoking—just facts. Ever tried nicotine gum/patches for focus? Or do you avoid it entirely? What’s your take?
0:34

Andrew Huberman drops a nuanced truth bomb on nicotine in this 34-second clip: “Nicotine is neuroprotective… increases acetylcholine and dopamine and epinephrine, leads to heightened focus, improved memory, and can offset neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.” But he immediately shuts down any misinterpretation: “Smoking cigarettes is bad because it’s carcinogenic. There are about a thousand carcinogens in cigarettes. Vaping is bad because of the chemicals you’re inhaling.” Nicotine itself has real cognitive & neuroprotective benefits (science-backed), but the delivery method (smoke/vape) is the killer. Classic Huberman: Separates compound from context. No free pass for smoking—just facts. Ever tried nicotine gum/patches for focus? Or do you avoid it entirely? What’s your take?

Camus

157,127 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

TWICE gathered around to examine the “couple pants” Nayeon and Momo coincidentally bought at different places😭 Nayeon says that they bought it at different places and the members are trying to figure out if it’s actually the same pants or not (it is)
0:31

TWICE gathered around to examine the “couple pants” Nayeon and Momo coincidentally bought at different places😭 Nayeon says that they bought it at different places and the members are trying to figure out if it’s actually the same pants or not (it is)

🍒

87,229 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”
2:11

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

People on here think they are speaking with Americans when in reality they are not. Because the whole point is to pretend like there’s consensus because that in of itself is a mind technique to manufacture it. The battle is for not falling for the propaganda wars that are occurring.
1:09

People on here think they are speaking with Americans when in reality they are not. Because the whole point is to pretend like there’s consensus because that in of itself is a mind technique to manufacture it. The battle is for not falling for the propaganda wars that are occurring.

Insurrection Barbie

15,882 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Andrew Huberman dropped a surprising take on Tom Segura’s podcast: Nicotine itself is actually neuroprotective — it boosts focus, memory, acetylcholine, dopamine, and may help protect against Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. But here’s the catch: smoking cigarettes is still terrible (thousands of carcinogens), vaping has nasty chemicals, and dipping/snuffing isn’t much better. Huberman doesn’t smoke or vape — he takes Alpha GPC (a supplement) to get the cognitive benefits without the poison. It’s a classic Huberman distinction: the molecule can be useful, the delivery method is often the problem. This one made me rethink nicotine entirely. Would you ever use nicotine (gum, patch, etc.) for focus and brain health, or is the risk not worth it to you?
2:26

Andrew Huberman dropped a surprising take on Tom Segura’s podcast: Nicotine itself is actually neuroprotective — it boosts focus, memory, acetylcholine, dopamine, and may help protect against Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. But here’s the catch: smoking cigarettes is still terrible (thousands of carcinogens), vaping has nasty chemicals, and dipping/snuffing isn’t much better. Huberman doesn’t smoke or vape — he takes Alpha GPC (a supplement) to get the cognitive benefits without the poison. It’s a classic Huberman distinction: the molecule can be useful, the delivery method is often the problem. This one made me rethink nicotine entirely. Would you ever use nicotine (gum, patch, etc.) for focus and brain health, or is the risk not worth it to you?

Camus

408,312 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

It’s time to End The Federal Reserve “What is the Federal Reserve and what is your answer?” G. Edward Griffin “Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It's not a government agency. It has the appearance of being a government agency and they went to great lengths to give it that facade. It does have the power of government because Congress voted to give the power of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel. It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel, sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. They got together, they drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry is what cartels do. And then they sent it to Congress and they took off the label at the top that said banking cartel and they erased that and they said Federal Reserve Act, Congress passed it into law. And that's why we think it's a government agency, is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison. And so it looks like a government agency, but basically the answer to your question is, it's a banking cartel.”
1:08

It’s time to End The Federal Reserve “What is the Federal Reserve and what is your answer?” G. Edward Griffin “Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It's not a government agency. It has the appearance of being a government agency and they went to great lengths to give it that facade. It does have the power of government because Congress voted to give the power of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel. It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel, sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. They got together, they drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry is what cartels do. And then they sent it to Congress and they took off the label at the top that said banking cartel and they erased that and they said Federal Reserve Act, Congress passed it into law. And that's why we think it's a government agency, is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison. And so it looks like a government agency, but basically the answer to your question is, it's a banking cartel.”

Wall Street Apes

211,137 просмотров • 1 год назад

They are all the same. They think the same way, that is why we are different and it is important for us to stay in our different countries. What he is saying makes sense to many Nigerians but to many of us it makes not sense, it is nonsense!
2:05

They are all the same. They think the same way, that is why we are different and it is important for us to stay in our different countries. What he is saying makes sense to many Nigerians but to many of us it makes not sense, it is nonsense!

Nitos Mitros🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦

17,984 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Paulina Mangubat, Content and Creative Director for Democrats: It’s so crazy, too, because they simply cannot take what they dish out at all. They try to distract by hurling these transphobic insults at our candidates because they’re ashamed of the fact that their agenda is so full of hate and that it’s not actually addressing what people really care about, which is affordability and being able to live a happy, fulfilling life
1:40

Paulina Mangubat, Content and Creative Director for Democrats: It’s so crazy, too, because they simply cannot take what they dish out at all. They try to distract by hurling these transphobic insults at our candidates because they’re ashamed of the fact that their agenda is so full of hate and that it’s not actually addressing what people really care about, which is affordability and being able to live a happy, fulfilling life

Acyn

22,912 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jessica: Jesse said they are doing this because they want to give illegals health care. That is not true. It is Gutfeld: Where? Is it prohibited in New York and California? Jessica: States are allowed to do what they want Watters: Where do they get the money?
0:24

Jessica: Jesse said they are doing this because they want to give illegals health care. That is not true. It is Gutfeld: Where? Is it prohibited in New York and California? Jessica: States are allowed to do what they want Watters: Where do they get the money?

Acyn

282,074 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.
0:59

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,190,914 просмотров • 1 год назад

AOC on Inflation: It’s not easy to just find a cheaper apartment when every apartment or every home in your area is the same unaffordable price. And so what is so challenging about this is that this isn’t just like going to the grocery store and buying the generic cereal and switching over. How do you actually accommodate when you can’t afford medicine, when you can’t afford your housing? This is a crisis… MacFarlane: Do you think the administration is taking it seriously? AOC: No, they’re making it worse because what the Trump administration is doing is entering sweetheart deal after sweetheart deal, whether it’s with Monsanto and our food supply with glyphosate, whether it’s housing, whether it’s, you know, these crypto agents that are engaged in money laundering—I think at least. I think they are not only ignoring it, they see it and they are actively making it worse. And what they think is that people are too dumb to understand what it is that they’re doing. They’re banking on the fact that people will support them no matter what and that nothing will change that support. And I think that what is really important is for every voter, regardless of your background or your party or whatever it is, to understand what’s your line and what is acceptable to you.
2:06

AOC on Inflation: It’s not easy to just find a cheaper apartment when every apartment or every home in your area is the same unaffordable price. And so what is so challenging about this is that this isn’t just like going to the grocery store and buying the generic cereal and switching over. How do you actually accommodate when you can’t afford medicine, when you can’t afford your housing? This is a crisis… MacFarlane: Do you think the administration is taking it seriously? AOC: No, they’re making it worse because what the Trump administration is doing is entering sweetheart deal after sweetheart deal, whether it’s with Monsanto and our food supply with glyphosate, whether it’s housing, whether it’s, you know, these crypto agents that are engaged in money laundering—I think at least. I think they are not only ignoring it, they see it and they are actively making it worse. And what they think is that people are too dumb to understand what it is that they’re doing. They’re banking on the fact that people will support them no matter what and that nothing will change that support. And I think that what is really important is for every voter, regardless of your background or your party or whatever it is, to understand what’s your line and what is acceptable to you.

Acyn

73,772 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Liberals refuse to accept that anyone they've decided is "on the wrong side" actually sincerely holds the beliefs they say they do. They assume we don't really mean it when we say men can't be women; that we genuinely support free speech (even the "hateful" kind), that Islam is a threat to Western democracy and values; that mass immigration is a problem, that harm reduction does not help the addiction crisis and in fact makes crime and homelessness worse. They think we voted for Trump out of spite, rather than because we actually support his policy positions and because he was talking about things that genuinely concerned us. They now act like it's impossible that Spencer Pratt and his supporters actually care about the things he says he cares about and wants to address. You know why? Because they are insincere. They don't actually believe what they say. They care about virtue signalling and social media likes more than they care about truth and ethics. They think everyone else lacks integrity because they lack integrity. They are phonies so assume everyone else is too.
1:23

Liberals refuse to accept that anyone they've decided is "on the wrong side" actually sincerely holds the beliefs they say they do. They assume we don't really mean it when we say men can't be women; that we genuinely support free speech (even the "hateful" kind), that Islam is a threat to Western democracy and values; that mass immigration is a problem, that harm reduction does not help the addiction crisis and in fact makes crime and homelessness worse. They think we voted for Trump out of spite, rather than because we actually support his policy positions and because he was talking about things that genuinely concerned us. They now act like it's impossible that Spencer Pratt and his supporters actually care about the things he says he cares about and wants to address. You know why? Because they are insincere. They don't actually believe what they say. They care about virtue signalling and social media likes more than they care about truth and ethics. They think everyone else lacks integrity because they lack integrity. They are phonies so assume everyone else is too.

Meghan Murphy

56,864 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Trump: But people walked into the oval office and a matter who they are, they just sort of feel sort of different. It is a great place to negotiate because everyone is discombobulated when they walk in.
0:41

Trump: But people walked into the oval office and a matter who they are, they just sort of feel sort of different. It is a great place to negotiate because everyone is discombobulated when they walk in.

Acyn

75,772 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 AMERICANS ARE “MICRODOSING CIGARETTES” — AND PEOPLE THINK SOCIETY IS COMPLETELY COOKED A woman is going viral after casually announcing that she’s bringing back “tiny skinny cigarettes” for the summer… because the world feels too awful to deal with sober. Her logic? • tiny cigarettes “don’t count” • they’re only bad AFTER summer • smoking becomes ‘microdosing being European’ • and pairing them with dirty martinis somehow makes it a “little treat” The clip feels like: • recession coping • burnout culture • luxury self-destruction • and Tumblr-era chaos all colliding at once Now the internet is completely divided: • “This is the most millennial coping mechanism I’ve ever seen.” • “People are romanticizing cigarettes again.” • “The economy is so bad we’ve circled back to smoking.” • “This somehow feels classy and deeply concerning at the same time.” • “We are literally entering the skinny cigarette recession era.” Some people are calling it hilarious. Others think it’s proof society is mentally exhausted and quietly giving up on “wellness culture.” Be honest… are cigarettes becoming “cool” again… or are people just done pretending wellness culture is working? 📹: TikTok/kellysites
1:04

🚨 AMERICANS ARE “MICRODOSING CIGARETTES” — AND PEOPLE THINK SOCIETY IS COMPLETELY COOKED A woman is going viral after casually announcing that she’s bringing back “tiny skinny cigarettes” for the summer… because the world feels too awful to deal with sober. Her logic? • tiny cigarettes “don’t count” • they’re only bad AFTER summer • smoking becomes ‘microdosing being European’ • and pairing them with dirty martinis somehow makes it a “little treat” The clip feels like: • recession coping • burnout culture • luxury self-destruction • and Tumblr-era chaos all colliding at once Now the internet is completely divided: • “This is the most millennial coping mechanism I’ve ever seen.” • “People are romanticizing cigarettes again.” • “The economy is so bad we’ve circled back to smoking.” • “This somehow feels classy and deeply concerning at the same time.” • “We are literally entering the skinny cigarette recession era.” Some people are calling it hilarious. Others think it’s proof society is mentally exhausted and quietly giving up on “wellness culture.” Be honest… are cigarettes becoming “cool” again… or are people just done pretending wellness culture is working? 📹: TikTok/kellysites

HustleBitch

145,496 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад