正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"Where does the false compassion of #openborders come from? It comes from the bold faced lie known as #DEI-diversity, equity, & inclusion. DEI supporters here are flummoxed b/c Councilman Josh McBroom Naperville City Council invited DEI to knock on their doors & not 1 person answered" -Shannon Adcock 🇺🇸🧵

Awake Illinois

28,911 subscribers

48,972 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治 #openborders #DEI

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Awake Illinois 的头像

Awake Illinois2 年前

To volunteer with Awake IL humanitarian crisis efforts, please submit interest at

Awake Illinois 的头像

Awake Illinois2 年前

"My motives are squarely on protecting our public safety & resources. I’m sorry I was the only one that had the courage to start this conversation. Did I think it would go national? No. It’s a crisis & a big problem. It needs to be talked about at a local level." -@Joshmcbroom

Awake Illinois 的头像

Awake Illinois2 年前

To volunteer with Awake IL humanitarian crisis efforts, please submit interest at

Awake Illinois 的头像

Awake Illinois2 年前

To watch the full Naperville city council meeting included comments on the border crossing crisis and more, public comments start at 11:40 mark

Awake Illinois 的头像

Awake Illinois2 年前

@DailyWireNews @FoxNews @TPUSA @charliekirk11 @SteveDeaceShow @NEWSMAX @EpochTimes @realchrisrufo @NTDNews @AnnCoulter @megynkelly @AnitaPadilla32 @BTnewsroom

DuPage_Redoubt 的头像

DuPage_Redoubt2 年前

@Joshmcbroom @Shannon_A_IL Too bad Shannon didn't speak earlier in the proceeding. She might have chased out more of leftist riff-raff in attendence. Watching that one liberal head explode and storm away like a petulant child was a nice end to the evening.

Kelly S. 的头像

Kelly S.2 年前

@Joshmcbroom @Shannon_A_IL An excellent speech, @Shannon_A_IL! 👏👏👏

The Truth Hurts You 的头像

The Truth Hurts You2 年前

@Joshmcbroom @Shannon_A_IL Just awesome. Thank you!

American Values, Inc. 的头像

American Values, Inc.2 年前

@Joshmcbroom @Shannon_A_IL Yes. There continue to be more who have the courage to stand up for what is right.

Brenda 的头像

Brenda2 年前

@Joshmcbroom @Shannon_A_IL Well done!

相关视频

Python Says Discriminatory DEI Policies More Important Than $1.5 Million Dollars The Python Software Foundation has turned down a $1.5 Million Dollar grant from the US government, as it would require them to cease discriminatory Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion practices.

Python Says Discriminatory DEI Policies More Important Than $1.5 Million Dollars The Python Software Foundation has turned down a $1.5 Million Dollar grant from the US government, as it would require them to cease discriminatory Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion practices.

The Lunduke Journal

17,364 次观看 • 10 个月前

MUST WATCH: Undercover investigation by Accuracy In Media EXPOSES city official from Raleigh, NC, for SECRETLY pushing DEI initiatives despite Trump's EOs. Briana Scurry, the Assistant. Director of Economic and Social Advancement, who introduced herself privately as the "Assistant Director for Equity and Inclusion," ADMITS that multiple city departments are hiding their DEI initiatives. "We don't want to draw attention to ourselves... we want to make sure this work is as protected as possible... We do partner oftentimes with [the Dept. of] Community Engagement." The City of Raleigh needs to be investigated immediately.

MUST WATCH: Undercover investigation by Accuracy In Media EXPOSES city official from Raleigh, NC, for SECRETLY pushing DEI initiatives despite Trump's EOs. Briana Scurry, the Assistant. Director of Economic and Social Advancement, who introduced herself privately as the "Assistant Director for Equity and Inclusion," ADMITS that multiple city departments are hiding their DEI initiatives. "We don't want to draw attention to ourselves... we want to make sure this work is as protected as possible... We do partner oftentimes with [the Dept. of] Community Engagement." The City of Raleigh needs to be investigated immediately.

Libs of TikTok

604,304 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨OUTRAGEOUS: Watch Texas Department of Transportation CONFIRM that they have spent up $1 BILLION on DEI contracts to build roads and bridges! They also admitted to having FIFTY taxpayer funded employees working in their Civil Rights Division, which, according to today’s budget request "promotes inclusion, diversity, and equity." Texas should be leading the fight against DEI… not spending billions of your dollars on it and also possibly compromising public safety.

🚨OUTRAGEOUS: Watch Texas Department of Transportation CONFIRM that they have spent up $1 BILLION on DEI contracts to build roads and bridges! They also admitted to having FIFTY taxpayer funded employees working in their Civil Rights Division, which, according to today’s budget request "promotes inclusion, diversity, and equity." Texas should be leading the fight against DEI… not spending billions of your dollars on it and also possibly compromising public safety.

Brian Harrison

358,738 次观看 • 1 年前

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

46,539 次观看 • 1 年前

Opposing DEI is 'stupidest thing ever': Failed former mainstream journalist Rachel Gilmore, a former Global News journalist who spread misinformation about the Freedom Convoy and briefly served as CTV's election fact checker, was called to testify on diversity, equity, inclusion and feminism during a Commons committee hearing. Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX lambaste the decision to invite the “failed former mainstream journalist", to the status of women committee discussing anti-feminist topics. Rachel Gilmore, who worked for Global News during the pandemic, was relieved of her duties, and then very briefly served as CTV's election fact checker before, once again, being let go from the company. But Gilmore's controversial time spent working for mainstream media outlets clearly resonated with some in government, who have invited her as a speaker during multiple committee hearings. “Do they have no other women that they could call to this committee?” wondered Lise, questioning the relevance of Gilmore's invitation. Gilmore, along with other speakers, were full of “anti-man” rhetoric during the hearing, Sheila said. “I don't even think they're feminist, per se,” she added, suggesting she doesn't believe they “actually care about vulnerable women who are suffering from domestic violence.” The blame was quickly cast toward white men, Sheila continued, despite statistics telling a different story. Sheila also highlighted a wild claim from Gilmore, who said online physical fitness communities “are a gateway to anti-feminist violence.” “Is that right?” deadpanned Lise. “If you're anti-DEI, it's the stupidest thing ever,” was another from Gilmore shared by Sheila. “Her entire appearance was DEI, like she's there simply because she's there because of DEI at the DEI committee.” Diversity, equity and inclusion policies are closely aligned with socialism, chimed in Lise. “Everywhere socialism has been applied, it's failed. Everywhere that DEI has been applied, it's failed.”

Opposing DEI is 'stupidest thing ever': Failed former mainstream journalist Rachel Gilmore, a former Global News journalist who spread misinformation about the Freedom Convoy and briefly served as CTV's election fact checker, was called to testify on diversity, equity, inclusion and feminism during a Commons committee hearing. Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX lambaste the decision to invite the “failed former mainstream journalist", to the status of women committee discussing anti-feminist topics. Rachel Gilmore, who worked for Global News during the pandemic, was relieved of her duties, and then very briefly served as CTV's election fact checker before, once again, being let go from the company. But Gilmore's controversial time spent working for mainstream media outlets clearly resonated with some in government, who have invited her as a speaker during multiple committee hearings. “Do they have no other women that they could call to this committee?” wondered Lise, questioning the relevance of Gilmore's invitation. Gilmore, along with other speakers, were full of “anti-man” rhetoric during the hearing, Sheila said. “I don't even think they're feminist, per se,” she added, suggesting she doesn't believe they “actually care about vulnerable women who are suffering from domestic violence.” The blame was quickly cast toward white men, Sheila continued, despite statistics telling a different story. Sheila also highlighted a wild claim from Gilmore, who said online physical fitness communities “are a gateway to anti-feminist violence.” “Is that right?” deadpanned Lise. “If you're anti-DEI, it's the stupidest thing ever,” was another from Gilmore shared by Sheila. “Her entire appearance was DEI, like she's there simply because she's there because of DEI at the DEI committee.” Diversity, equity and inclusion policies are closely aligned with socialism, chimed in Lise. “Everywhere socialism has been applied, it's failed. Everywhere that DEI has been applied, it's failed.”

Rebel News

29,942 次观看 • 9 个月前

I must confess that until recently I had never heard of Phool Dei, a spring festival that was celebrated yesterday in the villages of Uttarakhand. Children gather fresh flowers from the hills and go from house to house placing them on doorsteps, offering a blessing for the household: “Phool Dei, Chhamma Dei, Deni Dwar, Bhar Bhakar…” roughly wishing the home prosperity. In return they receive sweets. It reminded me a little of Halloween in the U.S., where children go door to door saying “trick or treat.” But what a lovely contrast. Here the children arrive not threatening a prank, or asking first, but giving first. Flowers. In an age when we speak so much about environmental consciousness, this graceful celebration of spring and nature deserves to be far more widely known. Just as Holi travelled across India and the world, perhaps Phool Dei should too. For me, the children of Uttarakhand are my #MondayMotivation

I must confess that until recently I had never heard of Phool Dei, a spring festival that was celebrated yesterday in the villages of Uttarakhand. Children gather fresh flowers from the hills and go from house to house placing them on doorsteps, offering a blessing for the household: “Phool Dei, Chhamma Dei, Deni Dwar, Bhar Bhakar…” roughly wishing the home prosperity. In return they receive sweets. It reminded me a little of Halloween in the U.S., where children go door to door saying “trick or treat.” But what a lovely contrast. Here the children arrive not threatening a prank, or asking first, but giving first. Flowers. In an age when we speak so much about environmental consciousness, this graceful celebration of spring and nature deserves to be far more widely known. Just as Holi travelled across India and the world, perhaps Phool Dei should too. For me, the children of Uttarakhand are my #MondayMotivation

anand mahindra

290,381 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Midterm Election Update 🚨 California’s 13th Congressional District GOP Primary Candidate Kevin Lincoln’s Radical DEI Hypocrisy Exposed On His Campaign Door Hangers As Stockton Mayor, Kevin Lincoln Kevin Lincoln, a GOP primary candidate in California’s 13th district, formally endorsed the very radical DEI framework President Trump President Donald J. Trump has worked to dismantle. Kevin Lincoln signed Resolution 2022-07-12-1504, which committed the city of Stockton to aggressive diversity, equity and inclusion policies including identity-based hiring and prioritization of equity across all city procedures. He even publicly praised it on video. However, on his campaign door hangers, Lincoln’s lies and hypocrisy can be seen in the way he says he “opposes DEI”. Kevin Lincoln is quite literally a DEI candidate who has used his race and identity politics to further his career. It’s laughable to see a man who believes in reparations say people “earn their place on merit” on his campaign door hangers. This hypocrisy raises serious questions about whether Lincoln. means what he says or simply borrows positions when convenient. In the competitive CA-13 race, voters cannot afford a candidate whose positions shift with the political winds. Kevin Lincoln’s enthusiastic support for the 2022 radical DEI resolution clashes directly with his current rhetoric and erodes trust with voters who are looking to flip CA-13 from blue to red and send a strong conservative to Congress. Another vetting failure… NRCC RECEIPTS 👇🏻

🚨 Midterm Election Update 🚨 California’s 13th Congressional District GOP Primary Candidate Kevin Lincoln’s Radical DEI Hypocrisy Exposed On His Campaign Door Hangers As Stockton Mayor, Kevin Lincoln Kevin Lincoln, a GOP primary candidate in California’s 13th district, formally endorsed the very radical DEI framework President Trump President Donald J. Trump has worked to dismantle. Kevin Lincoln signed Resolution 2022-07-12-1504, which committed the city of Stockton to aggressive diversity, equity and inclusion policies including identity-based hiring and prioritization of equity across all city procedures. He even publicly praised it on video. However, on his campaign door hangers, Lincoln’s lies and hypocrisy can be seen in the way he says he “opposes DEI”. Kevin Lincoln is quite literally a DEI candidate who has used his race and identity politics to further his career. It’s laughable to see a man who believes in reparations say people “earn their place on merit” on his campaign door hangers. This hypocrisy raises serious questions about whether Lincoln. means what he says or simply borrows positions when convenient. In the competitive CA-13 race, voters cannot afford a candidate whose positions shift with the political winds. Kevin Lincoln’s enthusiastic support for the 2022 radical DEI resolution clashes directly with his current rhetoric and erodes trust with voters who are looking to flip CA-13 from blue to red and send a strong conservative to Congress. Another vetting failure… NRCC RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

61,169 次观看 • 4 个月前

South Carolina PCA pastor says the church must dig in harder on DEI even as the secular world abandons it, because "God demands it" and there is no "room for diverse opinions" on whether Christians must pursue it. JP Sibley of New City Fellowship Orangeburg preaches: "DEI stands for diversity, equity + inclusion. Diversity. Seems like a good thing. Equity, fairness. Seems like a good thing. Inclusion. Seems like a good thing. But today, many laws and practices that promote these things are being torn down. And we need to be honest that this has an effect on many of us. It has an effect on how we feel, our safety. Maybe we feel unwanted. Maybe we feel insecure about our job or our family or what we're going to do or where we're going to be. We live in an increasingly segregated world, brothers and sisters. And so it is more important now than ever that God's kingdom pursues diversity and equity and inclusion. Maybe the government shouldn't demand it. I don't wanna get into politics, but God demands it. The church of Christ should be diverse. The church of Christ should not be segregated. Amen? The church of Christ should not be segregated. And it's more important now than ever that we face these divisions. Many of them are political and deeply held beliefs, I know. And there's room for diverse opinions about how should we handle these things in our society. But what there's not room for is: should we seek diversity, should we seek equality [sic], should we seek inclusion. How we go about it may be different, but in the church, in God's kingdom, we should set the example to the world. We should be, as Dr. King said, the headlight shining the way, directing, and he said, but it turns out the church is usually the tail light, catching up to the culture in terms of these things of equality and diversity."

South Carolina PCA pastor says the church must dig in harder on DEI even as the secular world abandons it, because "God demands it" and there is no "room for diverse opinions" on whether Christians must pursue it. JP Sibley of New City Fellowship Orangeburg preaches: "DEI stands for diversity, equity + inclusion. Diversity. Seems like a good thing. Equity, fairness. Seems like a good thing. Inclusion. Seems like a good thing. But today, many laws and practices that promote these things are being torn down. And we need to be honest that this has an effect on many of us. It has an effect on how we feel, our safety. Maybe we feel unwanted. Maybe we feel insecure about our job or our family or what we're going to do or where we're going to be. We live in an increasingly segregated world, brothers and sisters. And so it is more important now than ever that God's kingdom pursues diversity and equity and inclusion. Maybe the government shouldn't demand it. I don't wanna get into politics, but God demands it. The church of Christ should be diverse. The church of Christ should not be segregated. Amen? The church of Christ should not be segregated. And it's more important now than ever that we face these divisions. Many of them are political and deeply held beliefs, I know. And there's room for diverse opinions about how should we handle these things in our society. But what there's not room for is: should we seek diversity, should we seek equality [sic], should we seek inclusion. How we go about it may be different, but in the church, in God's kingdom, we should set the example to the world. We should be, as Dr. King said, the headlight shining the way, directing, and he said, but it turns out the church is usually the tail light, catching up to the culture in terms of these things of equality and diversity."

Woke Preacher Clips

39,958 次观看 • 1 年前

Pope Leo on Dei Verbum: "We begin our new series of catecheses on the Second Vatican Council by considering Dei Verbum, the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation. As today’s Scripture reading reminds us, Jesus calls us friends because he has revealed to us everything that he has heard from the Father. It is through Revelation, which reaches its fullness in Jesus, the Word made flesh, that we are invited to share in God’s life as his children in Christ. We are reminded that friendship with God is not only a gift, but also an invitation that requires a response, as in any relationship. To cultivate this friendship, we must spend time with God in prayer, both personally and especially through the Liturgy, where the community gathers to listen to the word of God with the guidance of the Church. Together, let us respond wholeheartedly to the Lord’s invitation and discover in his friendship the true mystery of our salvation."

Pope Leo on Dei Verbum: "We begin our new series of catecheses on the Second Vatican Council by considering Dei Verbum, the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation. As today’s Scripture reading reminds us, Jesus calls us friends because he has revealed to us everything that he has heard from the Father. It is through Revelation, which reaches its fullness in Jesus, the Word made flesh, that we are invited to share in God’s life as his children in Christ. We are reminded that friendship with God is not only a gift, but also an invitation that requires a response, as in any relationship. To cultivate this friendship, we must spend time with God in prayer, both personally and especially through the Liturgy, where the community gathers to listen to the word of God with the guidance of the Church. Together, let us respond wholeheartedly to the Lord’s invitation and discover in his friendship the true mystery of our salvation."

Vatican News

18,831 次观看 • 7 个月前

University drops job posting after DEI requirement exposed, professor says ‘I would not be hired’ today | Preston Mizell, Fox News University of Washington requires a 'one-page diversity statement' for new professor applications A University of Washington professor unleashed on the college’s strict diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requirements for new hires and a teacher performance rubric that includes a scorecard measuring DEI strategy used to assess potential professor performance. Stuart Reges, a non-tenured teaching professor at UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, said he wouldn’t have been hired under the strict DEI pledge requirements, despite his academic achievements at the university. "You have to say that you have deep knowledge of the DEIs in order to get a high rating on all of this," Reges told Fox News Digital. "Funny thing is, I'm convinced I would not be hired if I applied today. There's just no way, even though I've won the Distinguished Teaching Award here at the university." The University of Washington’s listing for an associate professor of school psychology role includes a mandatory "diversity statement" for all applicants, signifying a pledge to the university’s "commitment to racial equity." "A one-page diversity statement describing your identity, positionality, experience and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion and alignment to the APA's Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Framework," the job posting reads. "In addition, describe your philosophy of teaching and learning, including how your work will further the College of Education’s commitment to racial equity and social justice." Seattle Red radio host Jason Rantz also blasted the university’s hiring policy, saying in his recent op-ed that "this application process makes it easier to discriminate against conservatives, which is precisely why you won’t hear the far-left faculty speak out." "The university isn’t looking for diverse thought; it’s enforcing a monoculture of approved political opinions," Rantz added. In addition to the mandatory application diversity statement, the professor explained that a grading rubric to assess a potential professor's performance includes a section labeled "Diversity," ranking applicants on a scale of poor to excellent. A "Poor" rating describes the professor displaying "little evidence of potential to contribute to the UW Diversity Blueprint." "I've known faculty, very talented faculty who've left because of this kind of pressure and people who won't even apply," Reges explained. "I think a lot of grad students who might've wanted a career in teaching are kind of saying, why bother?" "I mean, look at all of the crap that you have to deal with," Reges added. "You have to kind of basically make up a statement that's going to make them happy saying the things that you're going to do." The publicly funded University of Washington’s dedication to "challenge" itself to implement DEI policies brings into question its alignment with President Donald Trump’s executive order from January titled: "President Donald J. Trump Protects Civil Rights and Merit-Based Opportunity by Ending Illegal DEI." "Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism," the executive order reads. In March, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched investigations into a number of universities for "race-exclusionary practices in education programs and activities." The University of Washington was among those universities being investigated. "The University of Washington does not view diversity and access as being in opposition to merit and excellence, and we remain committed to providing access to excellence for all," a spokesperson for the university told Fox News Digital. "Our hiring practices adhere to state and federal laws in ensuring that race is not a factor in hiring, and the UW has acted proactively when such a violation is known to have occurred." "Schools, colleges and departments within the University have significant latitude in their hiring practices, however all must adhere to state and federal laws," the spokesperson added. "The College of Education search referenced in a recent local commentator’s blog post was in compliance with these laws, but to prevent any ambiguity or misinterpretation, we are canceling it and providing additional guidance on hiring practices before it is reposted," the spokesperson continued. "We are also reviewing hiring practices more broadly to ensure that they follow state and federal laws." Read more:

University drops job posting after DEI requirement exposed, professor says ‘I would not be hired’ today | Preston Mizell, Fox News University of Washington requires a 'one-page diversity statement' for new professor applications A University of Washington professor unleashed on the college’s strict diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requirements for new hires and a teacher performance rubric that includes a scorecard measuring DEI strategy used to assess potential professor performance. Stuart Reges, a non-tenured teaching professor at UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, said he wouldn’t have been hired under the strict DEI pledge requirements, despite his academic achievements at the university. "You have to say that you have deep knowledge of the DEIs in order to get a high rating on all of this," Reges told Fox News Digital. "Funny thing is, I'm convinced I would not be hired if I applied today. There's just no way, even though I've won the Distinguished Teaching Award here at the university." The University of Washington’s listing for an associate professor of school psychology role includes a mandatory "diversity statement" for all applicants, signifying a pledge to the university’s "commitment to racial equity." "A one-page diversity statement describing your identity, positionality, experience and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion and alignment to the APA's Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Framework," the job posting reads. "In addition, describe your philosophy of teaching and learning, including how your work will further the College of Education’s commitment to racial equity and social justice." Seattle Red radio host Jason Rantz also blasted the university’s hiring policy, saying in his recent op-ed that "this application process makes it easier to discriminate against conservatives, which is precisely why you won’t hear the far-left faculty speak out." "The university isn’t looking for diverse thought; it’s enforcing a monoculture of approved political opinions," Rantz added. In addition to the mandatory application diversity statement, the professor explained that a grading rubric to assess a potential professor's performance includes a section labeled "Diversity," ranking applicants on a scale of poor to excellent. A "Poor" rating describes the professor displaying "little evidence of potential to contribute to the UW Diversity Blueprint." "I've known faculty, very talented faculty who've left because of this kind of pressure and people who won't even apply," Reges explained. "I think a lot of grad students who might've wanted a career in teaching are kind of saying, why bother?" "I mean, look at all of the crap that you have to deal with," Reges added. "You have to kind of basically make up a statement that's going to make them happy saying the things that you're going to do." The publicly funded University of Washington’s dedication to "challenge" itself to implement DEI policies brings into question its alignment with President Donald Trump’s executive order from January titled: "President Donald J. Trump Protects Civil Rights and Merit-Based Opportunity by Ending Illegal DEI." "Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism," the executive order reads. In March, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched investigations into a number of universities for "race-exclusionary practices in education programs and activities." The University of Washington was among those universities being investigated. "The University of Washington does not view diversity and access as being in opposition to merit and excellence, and we remain committed to providing access to excellence for all," a spokesperson for the university told Fox News Digital. "Our hiring practices adhere to state and federal laws in ensuring that race is not a factor in hiring, and the UW has acted proactively when such a violation is known to have occurred." "Schools, colleges and departments within the University have significant latitude in their hiring practices, however all must adhere to state and federal laws," the spokesperson added. "The College of Education search referenced in a recent local commentator’s blog post was in compliance with these laws, but to prevent any ambiguity or misinterpretation, we are canceling it and providing additional guidance on hiring practices before it is reposted," the spokesperson continued. "We are also reviewing hiring practices more broadly to ensure that they follow state and federal laws." Read more:

Owen Gregorian

94,153 次观看 • 10 个月前

It’s clear that you simply cannot call the inclusion of diversity hire, Elliot Page “inconsequential” in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey. Page (female) plays a prominent male Greek warrior (Sinon), who is not in book, nor The Iliad, is a “proxy for Achilles in Hades” This is pure subversion. All of these reviewers saying, “Helen of Troy & Sinon are only on screen for a few minutes” are looking really dumb right now. They’re making it sound as if these DEI hires don’t matter to the plot, and claim the outrage is overblown. That’s false & gaslighting. 🎥: Nerdrotic Nooner ft. Chris Gore

It’s clear that you simply cannot call the inclusion of diversity hire, Elliot Page “inconsequential” in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey. Page (female) plays a prominent male Greek warrior (Sinon), who is not in book, nor The Iliad, is a “proxy for Achilles in Hades” This is pure subversion. All of these reviewers saying, “Helen of Troy & Sinon are only on screen for a few minutes” are looking really dumb right now. They’re making it sound as if these DEI hires don’t matter to the plot, and claim the outrage is overblown. That’s false & gaslighting. 🎥: Nerdrotic Nooner ft. Chris Gore

Jon Root

76,140 次观看 • 1 个月前

HOLY SHIT!!! COUNCIL TAX EXPOSED!! A fren on my TG channel posted this in the chat. This is Sally on the phone to Stevenage Magistrates Court telling her that North Herts Council print their own “Court” summons. The court admits that the council use their own software to produce a court summons, it doesn’t come from the court. So every letter that they receive which looks like it’s from the magistrates court, is in fact directly from the local councils. No magistrate signs the court summons because it doesn’t come from them. She then goes on to say, that the council do all their own administration in producing these summons, the council rent a room off the court. BTW This is called a star chamber. SHE admits that these questions are coming up a lot when it comes to the legality of the court summons because it’s not been produced by the court. She also admits that the council are committing mass fraud by printing a magistrates court headed letter. She also admits it’s the same with liability orders. Again the court does not have anything to do with that. There you go, folks right from the horses mouth, admitting that court summons and liability orders do not come from a magistrates court. They come from the councils own software. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE.

HOLY SHIT!!! COUNCIL TAX EXPOSED!! A fren on my TG channel posted this in the chat. This is Sally on the phone to Stevenage Magistrates Court telling her that North Herts Council print their own “Court” summons. The court admits that the council use their own software to produce a court summons, it doesn’t come from the court. So every letter that they receive which looks like it’s from the magistrates court, is in fact directly from the local councils. No magistrate signs the court summons because it doesn’t come from them. She then goes on to say, that the council do all their own administration in producing these summons, the council rent a room off the court. BTW This is called a star chamber. SHE admits that these questions are coming up a lot when it comes to the legality of the court summons because it’s not been produced by the court. She also admits that the council are committing mass fraud by printing a magistrates court headed letter. She also admits it’s the same with liability orders. Again the court does not have anything to do with that. There you go, folks right from the horses mouth, admitting that court summons and liability orders do not come from a magistrates court. They come from the councils own software. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE.

The Yorkshire Lass

667,237 次观看 • 1 年前