Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Whether she was called Eileen or Arlene is ultimately irrelevant. Modern Appalachian folklore rarely concerns itself with accuracy.” -Attenborough’s Algorithm #deepstatecringe #attenboroughsalgorithm #comeoneileen #publicbehavior #streetanthropology

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Romanticising this incident is a big mistake. You know why? Let me ask you a few questions. First of all, who is she? A random woman in public, right? That’s what most people think. Okay, fine. But let me ask you this: What if she was a Muslim? What if she looked middle-class or poor? What if she was a South Indian or a dark-skinned lady? What if she spoke only Marathi? Okay, understood. You’ll say that no matter who she is, she was questioning the right thing. Fine. Now answer these questions too: Is she representing the people or just herself? If she claims to represent the people, is she an elected representative? If not, then who is she? Once again the answer is.... She is just a random bold woman. Got it. What right does she have to abuse a bunch of people and the leaders who were democratically expressing their opinion? Did those people burn anything? Did they abuse anyone? Did they violate any rules? Did they initiate any violence? The answer is "No." (Well..you don't even go near to them if such thing happens right? ) Their demonstration was completely legal. They had taken proper permission from the police and the local administration. Whether their demands are RIGHT or WRONG is a separate debate, but the protest itself was lawful. This is how democracy works. Every citizen in a democratic country must understand and respect this process. This lady, however, comes across as a moron — an abuser and a selfish individual who has no right to question an organised, legally permitted crowd headed by democratically elected leader. In a country like India.. the largest democracy in the world...Every democratic step taken up by any is a step towards shaping the future of India. If she got delayed for something, say work or movie or meeting or any damn thing ..she should have dealt with it seperately. Only emergency is permitted during such situations .. You may fight of an ambulance is stopped..or any medical emergency is stopped... It happens rarely..! This is India. Billions of people are living with their daily struggles and necessities. Your individual needs or anger have zero value unless you organise your own people and stand against any wrong practice democratically — or fight it legally through proper channels. Abusing leaders, women, and common citizens in this manner is completely unacceptable & punishable. This kind of stereotyping and instant justice will never work in India. If you are rich, if you are fair skinned, if you are flaunting like a upper caste,if you are wearing expensive clothes, if you have a camera in your hand, if you have the audacity to abuse anyone, and if you can lose your temper in front of people without considering their democratic rights — then you are not a “superwoman.” you are a "Stupid Woman" You are just so stupid, entitled woman who has no understanding of this country or its people. And the bigger problem is this: whenever someone raises questions against the government or elected representatives in a nasty way, most of us start celebrating them without analysing the facts. This incident and the attitude shown towards the minister and the protesting people is not acceptable at all. Ask this lady when she last voted. Ask her who the Chief Minister of Maharashtra is. Ask her who the MLA of her constituency is. Ask her the name of her constituency. If she knew the answers to these basic questions, she would not have behaved this way. She is just another elitist who has zero respect for India’s political and democratic system. Her entire attitude reveals that she doesn’t care about the people or the government. You may cross-verify the facts if you disagree with this. #DemocracyInDanger #RespectDemocracy #MaharashtraPolitics #EntitledWoman #HypocrisyExposed #ProtestRights #IndianDemocracy #NoToAbuse #PoliticalAwareness #DoubleStandards

We Dravidians

11,784 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

COOKED UP IN RAYNER's KITCHEN Five people have been arrested following serious allegations of electoral fraud in Tameside. The question every national outlet is avoiding is why Angela Rayner has not been called in? The threshold for a voluntary police interview is possession of material knowledge relevant to an investigation. Rayner meets it on four separate grounds. 1. She received a formal written complaint on 12 April containing photographic evidence of the precise conduct under investigation. Police need to know who in her office received it, who decided not to act, whether she was personally informed, and what steps if any followed. 2. She employs the declared winner. She would know his political activity and whether he discussed the ward with her before or after 12 April. 3. The scheme was discussed in her kitchen by her activists at an event she hosted. Police need to know what she heard that evening and whether concerns reached her through any other route. 4. Internal Labour WhatsApp groups were used to coordinate the scheme and messages were deleted. As the senior Labour figure in the area, the question of which groups she belonged to and who she was in contact with requires an answer only she can provide. A detective constable with this file would have put her in a room before the week was out. The failure to call her in is a choice. Someone made it. Andy Burnham's Greater Manchester Police know where Angela Rayner lives. Why have they not paid her a visit? Read my full article here; _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). 👉 You can also support me with a one-off contribution using one of these links. 👉 👉 Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

24,175 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

REPORT: A Texas mother was arrested for warning her neighbors on Facebook about contaminated water, and many Americans are starting to wonder if this is where the country is headed next. If residents begin speaking out about water shortages, pollution, or health concerns tied to massive AI infrastructure projects, will police eventually start treating those people like criminals too? The most disturbing part is the city later admitted the water was unsafe to use, after officials had already threatened residents with felony charges for speaking publicly about it. Jennifer Combs, a wife, mother, and first-time offender, was thrown in jail after posting that residents had reported getting sick from Trinidad’s brown water supply. Police called her post “false information” and charged her with felony false alarm, a statute normally reserved for fabricated emergencies and bomb threats. Then the story took an even darker turn. Just two weeks after police warned citizens they could face felony prosecution for discussing water concerns, the city itself issued a boil water notice telling residents not to drink, cook with, or wash dishes in the water without boiling it first. Now critics are asking a question that would have sounded unbelievable just a few years ago: if Americans start reporting water problems connected to giant AI projects and data centers, could speaking up itself become grounds for arrest? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report before stories like this stop feeling shocking.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

41,091 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

For nearly twelve months, my dear friend French journalist Bussigny Nora embedded herself within anti Israel circles she wanted to understand from the inside. She attended demonstrations, was present at organizational meetings, and immersed herself in campus life. What she witnessed troubled her. Language that might once have seemed extreme had become normalized: dehumanizing wordplay targeting Israel, references to a “Zionist entity” as though the country itself were illegitimate. Her conclusion, explored in her book, is that hostility toward Israel—and often toward Jewish people more broadly—has become a unifying force. Groups that share little ideologically, from radical leftists to Islamist organizations to progressive identity-focused movements, find common cause in this one area. She traces how funding flows through NGOs, left-wing political networks, and Palestinian solidarity campaigns, creating an infrastructure that supports collaboration among otherwise incompatible factions. Perhaps most striking was the reception she received when voicing concern about anti-Jewish sentiment or violence. Rather than engagement, she encountered dismissal. The act of naming the problem was treated as more offensive than the problem itself. The rhetoric she documented went beyond policy disagreement. It questioned whether Israel should exist at all—framing the nation not as flawed but as fundamentally illegitimate. It was a pleasure joining her in conversation with David Harris for his show.

Simone Rodan-Benzaquen

59,858 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce