Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Who Did It Better? After Satluj released, many viewers drew parallels between Honey Trehan's interrogation sequence and Quentin Tarantino's unforgettable tavern scene in Inglourious Basterds. Both rely on sharp dialogue, subtle expressions, and silence that says more than words ever could. Was it a tribute, an inspiration, or just...

33,295 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 5

Фото профиля Ashish Dixit
Ashish Dixit2 месяцев назад

While satluj scene was good but that scene of inglorious bastard is of a diff league. Why? In that scene another person was also responding and in 5 min the tone and body language of both the people got changed

Фото профиля DiabolicalCunt
DiabolicalCunt2 месяцев назад

Who did it better is an incredibly dumb question to ask since Tarantino literally inspired Trehan to design his scene in this way.

Фото профиля Sudhir Bharadhwaj
Sudhir Bharadhwaj2 месяцев назад

Both are great. No need to compare. They fit in the story perfectly. Both are equally chilling. Satnam communicates more just with his eyes and Suvinder Vicky perhaps delivers the best performance of his life in that scene as Sugga

Фото профиля बेताल पच्चीसी
बेताल पच्चीसी2 месяцев назад

Shamefull copy

Фото профиля anna
anna2 месяцев назад

I don't think both can be compared. In IB, the Nazi officer is checking the house. In Satluj, the police officer comes to a junior officer's house. He ate the food his mother. He gives the family a tiny hope that they may be safe and then kills them. Much more horrid.

Похожие видео

Makaveli once called "Reasonable Doubt" weak, and it was hilarious. All jokes aside, I do not share that same sentiment, but I do, however, think that album isn't nearly as great as y'all say it is. I also think it doesn't come close to the Killuminati album; it can't compare. I notice that "D'Evils" is the go-to track for Jay Z stans who feel a way about Makaveli calling the album weak, and they'll respond by saying things like Pac could never make anything close to the level of "D'Evils" because he wasn't lyrically skilled enough. They'll either say that type of blasphemous BS in response to that, or in defense of Jay Z allegedly telling Nas that Pac wasn't a lyricist, and publicly stating that Pac lacked technical skill, they tend to move the goalposts to who's the better lyricist or technician and claim that Pac wasn't technical or lyrical compared to Jay Z and never came close to making anything lyrically or technically better or on par with "D'Evils." They also say this type of shit in general conversations about who's better between Jay Z and 2Pac. It's a load of bullshit. Makaveli's "Blasphemy" clears "D'Evils" lyrically and technically, and using their logic, "Reasonable Doubt" is weak in comparison to the heat Makaveli was dropping and had on the way. 2Pac was easily the better lyricist, artist, and poet/rapper back then, and he still is. Objectively speaking, there are maybe one or two aspects that Jay Z technically did better on "D'Evils," but overall, "Blasphemy" clears it technically. Sidenote: Beanie Sigel doesn't belong in the same sentence with 2Pac. Beanie Sigel being a better lyricist than Jay Z is closer to being a good take than Beanie being a better lyricist than Pac.

9-FO Tha Negus

29,515 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад