Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Who remembers this? 🤔 Melissa Fleming, UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, bragged to the WEF in 2022 about how the United Nations partnered with Google to manipulate search results on climate change. 🇺🇳 💬 “𝑾𝒆 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒊𝒕.” This admission...

43,375 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Aus Integrity profil fotoğrafı
Aus Integrity1 yıl önce

“We own the science” GFY. WEF & UN are terrorist groups and should be treated as such

Martin Tyson profil fotoğrafı
Martin Tyson1 yıl önce

Ah, so it's being "massaged" to say the least?

Chris Martz profil fotoğrafı
Chris Martz1 yıl önce

Indeed

Unapologetic Boomer Nostalgia profil fotoğrafı
Unapologetic Boomer Nostalgia1 yıl önce

I use Google three or four times a month. Otherwise, I use Brave Search or duckduckgo. "We own the science." Arrogant authoritarian bastards.

Paul Fima profil fotoğrafı
Paul Fima1 yıl önce

"we own the science" WTF! They definitely own the propaganda!

ImUrCactusEnema profil fotoğrafı
ImUrCactusEnema1 yıl önce

"We OWN the science"? How much does it cost?

Si Fermor profil fotoğrafı
Si Fermor1 yıl önce

That 30s clip tells anyone all you need to know about the AGW fairy tale - we'll silence anyone with counter narrative information and "we own" the science, which I think is UN for "how dare you question us" 🙄

Damon Poole Broadcast HMT & Earth System Scientist profil fotoğrafı
Damon Poole Broadcast HMT & Earth System Scientist1 yıl önce

They own the ponzi scheme and they should be arrested for fraud!

Leonard Soares profil fotoğrafı
Leonard Soares1 yıl önce

It’s all a game to them.

Scott Rosen profil fotoğrafı
Scott Rosen1 yıl önce

@daniel_knauf “We own the science”!?! WTF!?!

Benzer Videolar

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,087 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 Donald Trump forced the United Nations to Speed up their Agenda — THIS WEEK, the UN is Meeting in New York to Install Three Global Governance Tools, and barely anyone is talking about it… “These are the last pieces to put in place to turn on a global governance machine.” • There was a very clear plan they had for the future… with Barrack Obama, they were in great shape… and Hillary was easily going to win. They believed there would be 16 straight years of slow movement towards this agenda. —— 16 year plan to destroy America —— they never thought she would lose. But then came along Donald Trump like a hand grenade in the room and screwed it all up… • The UN aims to have Three international Agreements signed THIS WEEK! 1. The Pact for the Future 2. The Declaration on Future Generations 3. The Global Digital Compact 🟤 THE PACT FOR THE FUTURE • the language in this pact includes all kinds of vague socialistic jargon… • In this pact however, the true intention is to get member states to agree to put policies into place ESG social credit scores into banking, so they could impose left-wing values through the financial system. • In this pact, there’s the promise from member states to have universal access to sexual and reproductive health for women —— this agreement includes universal access to abortion. • this pact calls for an emergency platform, which the UN Secretary General asked for as part of our common agenda. • The UN Secretary General, in the event of a ‘Global Shock’, which he gets to define, all kinds of vague powers to deal with the ‘Global Shock’ event, no matter where it is in the world. —— at the end of the the period to react, the UN Secretary General gets to decide if he can renew his powers, over and over again. 🟤 THE DECLARATION ON FUTURE GENERATIONS • The United Nations would create an entire new office to get young people more involved with the United Nations and their agendas… • Vague promises and powers to combat ‘Climate Change’ • Eliminating all forms of persistent historical and structural ‘inequalities’, including by acknowledging, addressing, and remedying past tragedies and their consequences —— this is a “catch-all” to do ANYTHING they want. 🟤 THE GLOBAL DIGITAL COMPACT • this would elevate the United Nations to be the global regulator of emerging technologies, especially in Artificial Intelligence (AI) —— “this includes the idea to embed left-wing social values into everything AI to ensure that its not promoting “hate speech”, OR “Misinformation/Disinformation”… • this agreement would provide financial backings to Media to say the things they want to promote or dispose. • this agreement would create a global governance group within the United Nations to combat “misinformation” in every country on earth. Glenn Beck goes on to say that he feels we may be entering the realm of the anti-Christ… Stay in prayer everyone. I have faith God has plans for us…

MJTruthUltra

715,969 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The UN Declares 'War' Against Covid and Climate Change 'Misinformation' "We are in an information war... we need to massively ramp up our response." The UN's Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications Melissa Flemings blamed Twitter/X for the spread of dangerous misinformation and "hate speech" at the Nobel Prize Summit. "And of course, firings at Twitter have left us with no one to call to flag content that is abusive or even incitement to violence. We're now seeing that almost anyone can promote disinformation for the price of a blue tick." "We have teamed up with the platforms to elevate reliable information around Covid and climate to amplify trusted messengers, and we have quite an army of them out there who want to take un content and promote it within their followings, and also educating users on how to slow the spread of disinformation." "Our new slogan that we want to have everybody have in their ear when they're online is 'pause, take care before you share'." "But yet we do feel like we are in an information war and that we need to massively ramp up our response." "So we're creating at the essential capacity to monitor and also have the ability to rapidly react when miss and disinformation and hate speech is threatening not just our people, our operations, but also the issues and the causes that we're working on." "But also we are going to be gearing up our verified initiative around climate change and developing this UN code of conduct on information integrity on digital platforms, hoping to set global standards that we can all advocate around, so that we can collectively work for more humane internet." The United Nations has announced a global effort to police the Internet for any "misinformation" that threatens the "issues and causes." Alarming.

Kyle Becker

1,592,302 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

.Kayleigh McEnany exposes how Democrats have been lying about climate change for years in a brutal segment exposing John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, AOC, and Barack Obama’s fear-mongering “In 1995, the New York Times predicted that most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years. Well, the beaches are still sandy and the ice caps are still frozen. But every major Democrat has campaign rather on climate change, using it as a scare tactic. Vote for them or the world's going to melt. And once they're in, they send huge climate contracts to their friends, to their donors, but no one's buying it anymore. Democrats have cried climate wolf so many times that even the Times is telling them to cut it out. They say Democrats don't have to campaign on climate change anymore. Turns out voters care about energy prices, not windmills, solar panels. The New York Times says it's not clear why climate should be at the center of Democrat campaigns. And even under Biden, climate wasn't a top priority for voters. A poll from 2024 had climate at the bottom of the list. And remember the Democrats' top climate warrior, Greta? Well, she moved on from fighting climate change to freeing Palestine. Is the left finally going to give up its most expensive scam? After decades of hysteria, decades of finger pointing, the polls tanked. The money dried up faster than they said our water sources would. And now all of a sudden, Democrats don't care about climate change anymore.”

Steve Guest

111,332 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Since taking office, President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the United Nations Paris agreement on climate change, unleashed fossil fuel production, cut climate subsidies that were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and chosen as his Secretary of Energy an oilman who helped create the fracking revolution. Given that Democrats have spent the last 20 years describing climate change as an “existential threat” and making climate policy their highest priority under Biden, one would expect there to be significant protests and other actions by progressives. And yet we’ve seen no significant climate change protests since Trump took office two months ago. No Greta Thunberg marches — she’s moved on to Palestine. No drumbeat from the news media. No Extinction Rebellion activists blocking traffic in DC. “Climate emergency” was not among the words chosen by Democrats in Congress to put on the little placards they held up during Trump’s address to Congress earlier this month. In fact, to the extent there have been protests by Democrats, they have been against the world’s most pioneering electric car manufacturer, Tesla, and have nothing to do with climate change. It’s true that many Democrats still care deeply about climate change and the issue may come back in the future. Where just 23% of Republicans view climate change as a serious threat to the country, 78% of Democrats do. “Executive orders are for show,” says political scientist and climate policy expert, The Honest Broker , on a new podcast for Public, “legislation is for real. And there doesn't seem to be any legislative strategy accompanying anything Trump is doing. As far as pulling out of Paris, we've done this dance before. Trump pulled out to Paris, and then Biden went back in.” And the media and Democrats routinely tie every natural disaster, such as the recent fires in LA, to climate change, even though there’s no good science supporting such connections, in most instances. “Every day there's some extreme weather somewhere,” said Pielke, who is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, “and so it is a perfectly made issue for sustaining some degree of attention.” But the partisan polarization over climate change, and the ease with which Trump and Biden can put the US in and out of the Paris agreement, all underscore the overall low level of concern with climate change in comparison to more pressing issues like inflation, migration, and even seemingly fringe issues like transgenderism. “The climate movement is a product of North America and Northern Europe,” said Pielke. “The ‘climate first’ voter is a tiny slice of the political landscape, even though they occupy a lot of attention and time on social media, in universities, and until recently, in the global financial sector. They made a lot of noise, but there weren't a lot of them around to begin with. The climate is just not that important to very many people around the world. People will say it's important. But give them a list of topics and it routinely comes in 17th, 18th, 19th, out of 20.” And now Pielke predicts that climate change could go the way of past environmental scares. “One story for the future of the climate discourse and climate change is that it's not going to go away, but it's going to fade from the center of public view like overpopulation did.” Why did climate change emerge as an issue of concern and then fade? “There's a pretty well-known economist named Anthony Downs who wrote a famous paper called the Issue Attention Cycle,” said Pielke. “It’s like a bell curve. You discover there's a potential problem, there's a lot of excitement, and ‘We’ve got to do something about it!’ Everybody gets on the bandwagon. Then you realize, ‘Oh my gosh, this is difficult! This is challenging!’ And then your attention goes to somewhere else and it's back down. And really climate change is following the Downs’ Issue Attention Cycle perfectly.” Pielke notes that the rate at which economies decarbonize, or reduce the amount of carbon dioxide per unit of GDP, is unchanged. “For the foreseeable future, we will continue to decarbonize the economy no matter what countries say about their climate commitments or whether there's a Viktor Orban or a Donald Trump in office. Decarbonization is much more powerful, it seems, than the politics of the climate. The Paris agreement hasn't really done anything to alter the trajectory of global decarbonization….Climate policy does a lot of things, but reducing carbon dioxide emissions is not one of those things...” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!

Michael Shellenberger

51,165 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce