Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why are so many woke leftists bad at understanding others? Brain science may have the answer.” Psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist argues that the left hemisphere of the brain is literal-minded and poor at “theory of mind” — the ability to truly grasp what someone else is thinking, especially when irony,...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

452,679 subscribers

36,339 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducationHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Why is the brain split in two? Dr. Iain McGilchrist’s 30-year answer is eye-opening. We need two opposite kinds of attention at once. Left hemisphere: narrow, laser-focused on grabbing what it wants. Right hemisphere: broad, open, vigilant — watching the entire living world so you don’t become lunch while chasing yours. When the left dominates, life feels fragmented, mechanical, and empty. When the right leads, everything feels connected, alive, and meaningful. McGilchrist warns we’ve let the left hemisphere take over — and beauty, wonder, and purpose are quietly disappearing. Have you felt the world shift between feeling flat and mechanical… versus vividly alive and connected? What changed your attention?
6:21

Why is the brain split in two? Dr. Iain McGilchrist’s 30-year answer is eye-opening. We need two opposite kinds of attention at once. Left hemisphere: narrow, laser-focused on grabbing what it wants. Right hemisphere: broad, open, vigilant — watching the entire living world so you don’t become lunch while chasing yours. When the left dominates, life feels fragmented, mechanical, and empty. When the right leads, everything feels connected, alive, and meaningful. McGilchrist warns we’ve let the left hemisphere take over — and beauty, wonder, and purpose are quietly disappearing. Have you felt the world shift between feeling flat and mechanical… versus vividly alive and connected? What changed your attention?

Camus

23,532 views • 3 months ago

A blind spot of the modern world is the way we prioritize the left side of the brain over the right side. The left brain dissects reality. It breaks it apart and analyzes each piece. It's obsessed with what things are. But the right brain sees things differently: it zooms out, grasps the whole, and asks what things mean. This is why we need science and religion: science dismantles the world to understand it, while religion rebuilds it to give life purpose. Without the right side of the brain, there's no space for the transcendent... the wonderful... the beautiful... and for God. (This is from the mathematician, John Lennox, who's building on the work of Iain McGilchrist)
1:37

A blind spot of the modern world is the way we prioritize the left side of the brain over the right side. The left brain dissects reality. It breaks it apart and analyzes each piece. It's obsessed with what things are. But the right brain sees things differently: it zooms out, grasps the whole, and asks what things mean. This is why we need science and religion: science dismantles the world to understand it, while religion rebuilds it to give life purpose. Without the right side of the brain, there's no space for the transcendent... the wonderful... the beautiful... and for God. (This is from the mathematician, John Lennox, who's building on the work of Iain McGilchrist)

David Perell

39,366 views • 1 year ago

“When people are absolutely convinced they’re right, they double down on the same failing path.” Iain McGilchrist dropped this on John Anderson. We’ve been sliding into left-hemisphere thinking since the Enlightenment. Everything reduced to procedures and algorithms. Bureaucrats now outrank doctors and professors. Wisdom and nuance are vanishing. We ignore the shadow side of our choices. When things fail, we don’t change course. We push harder. This explains so much of the institutional madness we see today. A society that loses the ability to see reality and correct mistakes is heading for serious trouble. Do you see this pattern playing out in your own world right now?
4:33

“When people are absolutely convinced they’re right, they double down on the same failing path.” Iain McGilchrist dropped this on John Anderson. We’ve been sliding into left-hemisphere thinking since the Enlightenment. Everything reduced to procedures and algorithms. Bureaucrats now outrank doctors and professors. Wisdom and nuance are vanishing. We ignore the shadow side of our choices. When things fail, we don’t change course. We push harder. This explains so much of the institutional madness we see today. A society that loses the ability to see reality and correct mistakes is heading for serious trouble. Do you see this pattern playing out in your own world right now?

Camus

32,089 views • 1 month ago

Let me give everyone just a little common sense test. It may be that I retired from the United States Air Force, that the answer is crystal clear to me and maybe a bit more challenging for others. So the guy on the left is claiming to be the president of the United States of America. He claims his name is Joe Biden but we know Joe Biden is dead. He faced a military tribunal and was executed. So really do you really think that a president of the United States of America gets off a plane and gets into some random dudes vehicle? Only someone that doesn't know anything about the military would think such nonsense. Or are you someone that has a great deal of common Sense and critical thinking ability and can see this motorcade on the right and know that that's what a presidential motorcade looks like and that means the president is really in there. This so happened to be president Trump on his way to South Carolina rally. So is the real president on the left side or is the real president on the right side? This really should be a no-brainer but of course we know liberals absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt or no brainers they have no brains, they have no common sense, there are cognitive dissonance is all messed up, and they have zero critical thinking capabilities. By the way even former presidents don't have motorcades that look like that for anybody thinking that the excuse for it. So-called president gets in an Uber carrying his own luggage and people can't wake the hell up.
1:01

Let me give everyone just a little common sense test. It may be that I retired from the United States Air Force, that the answer is crystal clear to me and maybe a bit more challenging for others. So the guy on the left is claiming to be the president of the United States of America. He claims his name is Joe Biden but we know Joe Biden is dead. He faced a military tribunal and was executed. So really do you really think that a president of the United States of America gets off a plane and gets into some random dudes vehicle? Only someone that doesn't know anything about the military would think such nonsense. Or are you someone that has a great deal of common Sense and critical thinking ability and can see this motorcade on the right and know that that's what a presidential motorcade looks like and that means the president is really in there. This so happened to be president Trump on his way to South Carolina rally. So is the real president on the left side or is the real president on the right side? This really should be a no-brainer but of course we know liberals absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt or no brainers they have no brains, they have no common sense, there are cognitive dissonance is all messed up, and they have zero critical thinking capabilities. By the way even former presidents don't have motorcades that look like that for anybody thinking that the excuse for it. So-called president gets in an Uber carrying his own luggage and people can't wake the hell up.

Truth Awakening

1,755,701 views • 2 years ago

According to Bentov, consciousness evolves to the 'absolute' which is the source of all consciousness. Matter, composed of quanta of energy, is the vibrating, changing component of pure consciousness. The absolute is fixed, manifest and invisible. Bentov proposed that the brain acts as a transducer, converting the energy of consciousness into the electrical and chemical signals that are used to communicate information within the body. He also believed that the brain has the ability to tune into different frequencies of consciousness, allowing individuals to experience different states of awareness. Bentov's theory is based on the idea that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe and is not limited to the brain or the body. He argued that consciousness is non-local, meaning it is not bound by space and time and can exist independently of the physical body. Bentov's theory has been influential in the field of consciousness studies, but it remains a subject of debate and is not widely accepted by mainstream science.
2:39

According to Bentov, consciousness evolves to the 'absolute' which is the source of all consciousness. Matter, composed of quanta of energy, is the vibrating, changing component of pure consciousness. The absolute is fixed, manifest and invisible. Bentov proposed that the brain acts as a transducer, converting the energy of consciousness into the electrical and chemical signals that are used to communicate information within the body. He also believed that the brain has the ability to tune into different frequencies of consciousness, allowing individuals to experience different states of awareness. Bentov's theory is based on the idea that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe and is not limited to the brain or the body. He argued that consciousness is non-local, meaning it is not bound by space and time and can exist independently of the physical body. Bentov's theory has been influential in the field of consciousness studies, but it remains a subject of debate and is not widely accepted by mainstream science.

Vicky Verma

390,472 views • 1 year ago

Max Tegmark, physicist and chairman of the Future of Life Institute, argues that sentiment across the political spectrum is turning against a "race to replace" humans at work, in relationships and in decision-making. He explains to Alex Hern, The Economist's AI writer, what he thinks is driving the shift, and why politicians are listening:
2:39

Max Tegmark, physicist and chairman of the Future of Life Institute, argues that sentiment across the political spectrum is turning against a "race to replace" humans at work, in relationships and in decision-making. He explains to Alex Hern, The Economist's AI writer, what he thinks is driving the shift, and why politicians are listening:

The Economist

50,484 views • 1 month ago

Tim Fool doesn't just ride the struggle bus; he lives in it, down by the river. The people he's mad at have been calling the Woke Right "the Right Hand of the Left" for three years or more already. We already know they're Leftists, and we've dealt with the arguments. What makes them "Woke Right " is the inversion of the Woke Left intersectional hierarchy and the adoption of a counterrevolutionary (Reactionary) Theory of state.
3:44

Tim Fool doesn't just ride the struggle bus; he lives in it, down by the river. The people he's mad at have been calling the Woke Right "the Right Hand of the Left" for three years or more already. We already know they're Leftists, and we've dealt with the arguments. What makes them "Woke Right " is the inversion of the Woke Left intersectional hierarchy and the adoption of a counterrevolutionary (Reactionary) Theory of state.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

59,979 views • 8 months ago

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”
1:18

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”

Steven Pinker

44,931 views • 1 month ago

Jerry Seinfeld on Woke Left Killing Comedy: 'This is the Result of the Extreme Left and PC Crap' "Nothing really affects comedy. People always need it, they need it so badly, and they don’t get it." "It used to be, you would go home at the end of the day, most people would go, ‘Oh, ‘Cheers’ is on; oh, ‘M.A.S.H.’ is on; oh, Mary Tyler Moore is on; ‘All in the Family’ is on.’ You just expected, ‘There’ll be some funny stuff we can watch on TV tonight.’ Well, guess what? Where is it?" "This is the result of the extreme left and PC crap and people worrying so much about offending other people. When you write a script and it goes into four or five different hands, committees, groups — ‘Here’s our thought about this joke’ — well, that’s the end of your comedy..." Whenever comedy dies in a culture, it becomes more vulnerable to extremist movements and social unrest. Woke authoritarians cannot stand that their absurd ideas are being exposed to ridicule and satire. They have been "educated" at elite schools, and therefore, their ideas "must" be the right ones. They simply don't understand why Normies think their ideas are ridiculous, and thus, they seek to censor criticism instead of listen to those they deem 'inferior.' But a society that cannot laugh at itself becomes closed to criticism. That is where the Woke intelligentsia is at in America today and that is why comedy — and the culture at large — is dying.
0:56

Jerry Seinfeld on Woke Left Killing Comedy: 'This is the Result of the Extreme Left and PC Crap' "Nothing really affects comedy. People always need it, they need it so badly, and they don’t get it." "It used to be, you would go home at the end of the day, most people would go, ‘Oh, ‘Cheers’ is on; oh, ‘M.A.S.H.’ is on; oh, Mary Tyler Moore is on; ‘All in the Family’ is on.’ You just expected, ‘There’ll be some funny stuff we can watch on TV tonight.’ Well, guess what? Where is it?" "This is the result of the extreme left and PC crap and people worrying so much about offending other people. When you write a script and it goes into four or five different hands, committees, groups — ‘Here’s our thought about this joke’ — well, that’s the end of your comedy..." Whenever comedy dies in a culture, it becomes more vulnerable to extremist movements and social unrest. Woke authoritarians cannot stand that their absurd ideas are being exposed to ridicule and satire. They have been "educated" at elite schools, and therefore, their ideas "must" be the right ones. They simply don't understand why Normies think their ideas are ridiculous, and thus, they seek to censor criticism instead of listen to those they deem 'inferior.' But a society that cannot laugh at itself becomes closed to criticism. That is where the Woke intelligentsia is at in America today and that is why comedy — and the culture at large — is dying.

Kyle Becker

978,026 views • 2 years ago

Jordan Peterson explained the Woke Right ("Alt Right") back in 2018. It's not new, but two things are. 1) It's making a concerted bid for power in mainstream conservative spaces now and significantly succeed after years of infiltration 2) We know what makes them "Alt" is Woke. There's an interesting additional point here that's very important. Peterson is talking about how the Left tried to label him "Alt Right" as a polarizing smear. The Woke Left could do that because it can draw a distinction between itself and the reaction it created so long as there's distinction in the names. They could make it seem like there was a sprawling Alt Right that's really evil and scary and only the Woke Left can resist it. Peterson was having to defy this at considerable effort, and much of the Left didn't buy it anyway. This is the dialectic. The term "Woke Right" throws a monkey wrench into this dialectical program and breaks the machine. The (Woke) Left can post up and do the dialectic against any name for it except "Woke Right." The reason is that the term "Woke Right" is derivative to Woke, so you cannot think of the Woke Right without also thinking of the Woke Left, which is the referent. What makes the Woke Right bad is being almost just like the Woke Left. "Woke," not Left or Right, becomes the problem, short-circuiting the dialectic and neutering the Left on this dimension of their united front tactics. It therefore puts the problem squarely where it belongs: on Woke. This frees people up to consider Left and Right (better: liberal and conservative) outside of the polarizing game of radical extremes. It was this factor that ultimately sold me completely on the term "Woke Right" not just as accurate and good but as genius. H/t (clip and argument) Entropyrian, who is a great follow.
0:37

Jordan Peterson explained the Woke Right ("Alt Right") back in 2018. It's not new, but two things are. 1) It's making a concerted bid for power in mainstream conservative spaces now and significantly succeed after years of infiltration 2) We know what makes them "Alt" is Woke. There's an interesting additional point here that's very important. Peterson is talking about how the Left tried to label him "Alt Right" as a polarizing smear. The Woke Left could do that because it can draw a distinction between itself and the reaction it created so long as there's distinction in the names. They could make it seem like there was a sprawling Alt Right that's really evil and scary and only the Woke Left can resist it. Peterson was having to defy this at considerable effort, and much of the Left didn't buy it anyway. This is the dialectic. The term "Woke Right" throws a monkey wrench into this dialectical program and breaks the machine. The (Woke) Left can post up and do the dialectic against any name for it except "Woke Right." The reason is that the term "Woke Right" is derivative to Woke, so you cannot think of the Woke Right without also thinking of the Woke Left, which is the referent. What makes the Woke Right bad is being almost just like the Woke Left. "Woke," not Left or Right, becomes the problem, short-circuiting the dialectic and neutering the Left on this dimension of their united front tactics. It therefore puts the problem squarely where it belongs: on Woke. This frees people up to consider Left and Right (better: liberal and conservative) outside of the polarizing game of radical extremes. It was this factor that ultimately sold me completely on the term "Woke Right" not just as accurate and good but as genius. H/t (clip and argument) Entropyrian, who is a great follow.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

47,160 views • 1 year ago

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.
0:45

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 views • 4 months ago

This sillyness right here is why the “victim culture” online has just brainwashed so many people of basic rational thinking This guy commits 800+ instances of fraud (someone check this please!), takes opportunity from all the other competitors, and undermines the production In what world is this guy a victim? What about all the other people who competed and produced the tourney? Some of you are so hard wired to think big company = bad that you have lost ALL sense of reality What a world
2:20

This sillyness right here is why the “victim culture” online has just brainwashed so many people of basic rational thinking This guy commits 800+ instances of fraud (someone check this please!), takes opportunity from all the other competitors, and undermines the production In what world is this guy a victim? What about all the other people who competed and produced the tourney? Some of you are so hard wired to think big company = bad that you have lost ALL sense of reality What a world

Samito

20,628 views • 1 year ago

🚨: Charlie Kirk has been shot😧 This is heartbreaking footage. My prayers are with him. Regardless of what you think of Charlie, no man deserves to be shot like this, especially someone who has done so much for freedom and has inspired so many young minds across the world. When I refer to the so-called “loving left”, I mean those who identify with a new kind of 'left wing': hateful and soulless individuals who believe that people like myself, Charlie, and many others deserve death simply because we are labelled BY THEM “far-right fascists” - when in fact we are the opposite. These people are mentally unstable, yet they preach nothing but “openness, acceptance and love.” Enough is enough - this goes beyond politics, it is a battle of good and evil. This is so hard to watch, and it should be a stark reminder of the importance of free speech and the danger of allowing the state to divide us.
1:43

🚨: Charlie Kirk has been shot😧 This is heartbreaking footage. My prayers are with him. Regardless of what you think of Charlie, no man deserves to be shot like this, especially someone who has done so much for freedom and has inspired so many young minds across the world. When I refer to the so-called “loving left”, I mean those who identify with a new kind of 'left wing': hateful and soulless individuals who believe that people like myself, Charlie, and many others deserve death simply because we are labelled BY THEM “far-right fascists” - when in fact we are the opposite. These people are mentally unstable, yet they preach nothing but “openness, acceptance and love.” Enough is enough - this goes beyond politics, it is a battle of good and evil. This is so hard to watch, and it should be a stark reminder of the importance of free speech and the danger of allowing the state to divide us.

Montgomery Toms

20,278 views • 10 months ago

What does "not thinking" as much in Year Two mean for Broncos QB Bo Nix? He explains: "Well, it helps a lot because I'm not thinking about what the offense is doing," he says. "When you go up to the line of scrimmage, you want to be only thinking about the defense, only processing and reacting to the defense, not maybe the footwork or the motion or the timing or whatever that I'm doing, so that -- I feel like -- process is eliminated, and now I can focus on a lot more of the defense."
0:25

What does "not thinking" as much in Year Two mean for Broncos QB Bo Nix? He explains: "Well, it helps a lot because I'm not thinking about what the offense is doing," he says. "When you go up to the line of scrimmage, you want to be only thinking about the defense, only processing and reacting to the defense, not maybe the footwork or the motion or the timing or whatever that I'm doing, so that -- I feel like -- process is eliminated, and now I can focus on a lot more of the defense."

Andrew Mason

17,956 views • 1 year ago

The company he’s in may not truly appreciate him. The booker is an incompetent irredeemable hack. Hell, there are a ton of people that won’t fully appreciate or grasp this man’s greatness. And yet, even in the midst of an absolute waste of one of his final appearances, we’re still given something like this. An entrance to remember. John Cena is singular. John Cena is one of one. I’m gonna miss this man so fucking much, and especially in fully realizing the scope of last night, the clock being where it’s at hurts even more. We only have five more left.
2:18

The company he’s in may not truly appreciate him. The booker is an incompetent irredeemable hack. Hell, there are a ton of people that won’t fully appreciate or grasp this man’s greatness. And yet, even in the midst of an absolute waste of one of his final appearances, we’re still given something like this. An entrance to remember. John Cena is singular. John Cena is one of one. I’m gonna miss this man so fucking much, and especially in fully realizing the scope of last night, the clock being where it’s at hurts even more. We only have five more left.

Adonis

113,161 views • 10 months ago

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.
1:51

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Shruti

16,744 views • 1 month ago

This pisses me off so bad. Why is the left so bad at answering “does Israel have a right to exist” that the groyper candidate in Florida answered it more correctly and coherently than any of them.
0:27

This pisses me off so bad. Why is the left so bad at answering “does Israel have a right to exist” that the groyper candidate in Florida answered it more correctly and coherently than any of them.

barbarism critic

60,811 views • 9 days ago

The Apollonians may have just totally redeemed themselves "I would look at morality...particularly Judaic Christian morality as, as also being a kind of weapon" "Jews got it in the heads of their their masters that actually being good is being meek, being good is being weak" "Being evil is being strong. And so that morality itself is wills of power. Morality can be used as a weapon and so much of what is directed against the identitarian idea or or nationalism" "So morality in this way can be a weapon used against us and, and I think so many of the, the, the fundamental reasons why white people aren't dominating the entire planet as as we certainly can is because of this black cloud that has been hanging over us" "This notion that our history is bad, that, that when we were in power that was just awful and immoral and, and, and and so on." "We need to have a a consciousness of morality and and to start reforming A morality willfully that that is that is life affirming and that is race affirming."
2:58

The Apollonians may have just totally redeemed themselves "I would look at morality...particularly Judaic Christian morality as, as also being a kind of weapon" "Jews got it in the heads of their their masters that actually being good is being meek, being good is being weak" "Being evil is being strong. And so that morality itself is wills of power. Morality can be used as a weapon and so much of what is directed against the identitarian idea or or nationalism" "So morality in this way can be a weapon used against us and, and I think so many of the, the, the fundamental reasons why white people aren't dominating the entire planet as as we certainly can is because of this black cloud that has been hanging over us" "This notion that our history is bad, that, that when we were in power that was just awful and immoral and, and, and and so on." "We need to have a a consciousness of morality and and to start reforming A morality willfully that that is that is life affirming and that is race affirming."

Seethroughitall

40,057 views • 2 months ago