正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why is India Paying Billions for Jets It Can’t Fully Control? Buying advanced jets without source-code control limits real combat autonomy. France’s refusal exposes India’s dependence on foreign permissions in warfighting. Operational delays could prove costly in high-intensity conflict. Expensive imports don’t guarantee dominance without sovereign control.

13,449 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇮🇳🇫🇷 SORRY DONALD, THE DEAL IS FRENCH! India Rejects US Pressure & Locks in the RAFALE TSUNAMI! 🌊🤣 While President Trump was busy tweeting about tariffs and complaining that "Modi is not happy" with him, India quietly prepared the paperwork for the Deal of the Century... with France. 💅☕️ Reports confirm India is finalizing the acquisition of 114 Rafale Jets for the IAF AND 26 Rafale-M for the Navy. The "Art of the Deal" just got school’d by New Delhi. Why Uncle Sam is crying: 1. The American Rejection The US pushed the F-18 Super Hornet and F-21 hard. They threatened sanctions, complained about Russian oil, and slapped tariffs on us. India’s Response? "Seen 10: 00 PM." Left on read. We chose the jet that doesn't come with a 'User Manual' written by the US Congress. 2. The 'Made in India' Fortress This isn't just buying; it's owning. Tata Advanced Systems is setting up to build the bird here. 60% Value Retention in India. We aren't just flying them; we are building the ecosystem to replace them with our own AMCA later. 3. Total Dominance (The Two-Front Nightmare) China: Panicking because the Rafale-M on INS Vikrant means the Indian Ocean is a "No-Entry" zone. Pakistan: Already has PTSD from the Rafale sound barrier and the latest wrath in Operation sindoor. US: Realizing that "Strategic Autonomy" means you can't bully India into buying your jets. The Deal Breakdown- --> Navy: 26 Rafale-M (~₹63k Cr) for INS Vikrant. Immediate IOR control. China blocked. -->Air Force: 114 MRFA ALL Rafale jets. Why? Speed + Logistics. We know them, we rule with them. No drama. Macron is visiting next month to likely seal the deal. Trump can keep his tariffs; we’ll keep the best Omni-Role fighter in the world. Strategic Autonomy 1, Bullying 0. France has stood by India through THICK and THIN (1998 Nuclear tests, Kargil, Kashmir). The Ultimate deterrent is loading... Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) TheGlobalDecoder #India #France #Rafale #Trump #MakeInIndia #IndianNavy #IAF #INSVikrant #Modi #Macron

The Sacred Scroll

2,203,339 次观看 • 8 个月前

Big Breaking Jolt 🚨 🚨 This is not just a trade proposal — it is an economic threat aimed straight at India. The U.S. bill proposing 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian oil, now backed by Donald Trump, directly targets India’s energy lifeline. India turned to discounted Russian crude to protect its economy, control inflation, and shield ordinary citizens from global fuel shocks created by Western wars and sanctions. If enforced, these tariffs will hit India on multiple fronts. • Fuel prices will surge, pushing transport and food costs higher. • Inflation will rise, squeezing households already under pressure. • Manufacturing and exports will suffer, as higher energy costs reduce competitiveness. • Strategic autonomy will be undermined, forcing India to choose between national interest and external coercion. India did not create the Ukraine war. India did not impose sanctions on itself. Yet India is now being punished for making a sovereign decision to secure affordable energy for 1.4 billion people. This move exposes the real nature of U.S. pressure politics — compliance over partnership, punishment over cooperation. Venezuela was dealt with militarily. India is being cornered economically. The question before India is no longer about oil alone. It is about whether global powers will respect India’s independent foreign policy or attempt to break it through economic intimidation, perhaps owing to its weak spineless leadership. Why India is being targeted with 500% tariffs, Zero Respect and Daily Humiliation — how U.S. pressure politics threatens India. Are we missing something here❓ Is there something that Modi Govt is hiding from India❓ Nonetheless, it’s a bloody rotten fish here‼️ #Trump #Modi #USA #India #Tariffs #ModiFailedIndia #ModiHaitoMumkinHai

Pragnya Gupta

11,311 次观看 • 8 个月前

Andy Burnham says Britain is paying too much for the basics and promises “more public control” over water, energy and transport. That sounds fine until you remember one rather important fact. The price of water and electricity is already controlled by the state. Ofgem sets the energy price cap. Ofwat sets price controls for water companies. Regulators already decide what private monopoly utilities are allowed to charge, what returns they can make, what investment plans they can claim for, and how much of the burden gets pushed onto households and businesses. So what exactly does “more public control” mean? Because if Burnham means more regulation, we have already tried that. It has failed. Bills are still too high, rivers are still polluted, infrastructure is still creaking, and private investors are still extracting from assets the public cannot live without. The problem is not a lack of public control. The problem is ownership. You cannot properly control a monopoly utility while leaving the monopoly in private hands and pretending the regulator is a substitute for democracy. This is where Burnham’s fiscal confusion matters too. He talks about giving people breathing space, but refuses to say the obvious: a sovereign government is not a household. Within the real limits of labour, materials, energy, skills and inflation, Britain can build and own what it needs. The real fiscal rule should be simple. If the public pays, the public owns. Not “public control” while private firms keep the pipes, cables, profits and ransom note. Public ownership. Public investment. Public accountability. Anything less is just the same failed model wearing a northern accent. #weownit #andy

The Heartlands Tribune

27,839 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jaishankar vs Soros : India's Foreign Minister Delivers a Masterclass in Diplomacy & Defiance Dr. Jaishankar’s handling of George Soros is a strong example of India’s current foreign-policy style: calm, direct, and unapologetic about sovereignty. In the widely circulated 2023 remarks, he called Soros “old, rich, opinionated” and “dangerous,” arguing that such figures try to shape narratives rather than accept democratic outcomes. Dr. Jaishankar did not answer with outrage; he framed the issue as a larger debate about who gets to define democracy and legitimacy in a changing global order. That allowed him to turn a personal provocation into a defense of India’s electoral mandate and strategic autonomy. His line worked because it was both sharp and disciplined. Instead of escalating the confrontation, he used language that signaled confidence while keeping the focus on India’s position, not Soros’s publicity. The response landed well with audiences who see India pushing back more assertively against Western commentary on domestic politics. It also fit Jaishankar’s broader diplomatic image: composed, technically precise, and willing to challenge double standards without sounding defensive. That is why many commentators describe his approach as a “masterclass” in modern diplomacy. It blends message control, strategic ambiguity, and national assertiveness rather than relying on rhetorical volume. The Soros exchange was never just about one billionaire. It was about India rejecting the idea that external opinion can sit in judgment over its democracy or policy choices. Dr. Jaishankar’s core message was that India will answer criticism, but on its own terms. Credit : Justice For India.

Augadh

96,378 次观看 • 3 个月前