Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Why “quarantining Iran” is militarily impossible and strategically reckless 🚫 In this clip, I explain that even with “140,000 troops on the ground… on top of 350,000 Afghan troops,” we “could not stop cross‑border traffic in that one province.” Yet Washington claims we can seal all of Iran —...

27,599 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

⚠️ Col. Macgregor: Iran Negotiations Are a Pause, Not Peace In this new Deep Dive clip, Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) lays out why the Iran war is not over — only paused — and why Trump’s latest threats to “finish the job” won’t force Tehran to concede. Macgregor explains that the 60‑day negotiation window was doomed from the start. “If we look at those 14 points… is there really any chance whatsoever that we would ever willingly sign up for all 14?” Agreeing to them, he says, would be a “tacit admission that we were defeated militarily.” He also breaks down how Israel’s objectives shifted after their initial plan collapsed. “The principal Israeli puppet was supposed to be the crown prince… that failed.” What remains, Macgregor warns, is the push for the “utter and complete destruction of Iran.” Trump’s talk of bombing infrastructure doesn’t change that reality. As Macgregor puts it, “We’re talking about killing civilians, destroying lots of infrastructure… leaving Iran in complete ruins.” These are not decisive military targets — they’re signals of a preferred outcome that has nothing to do with diplomacy. His bottom line is stark: “This is not over. We are at pause.” The Iran war, the Middle East conflict, and U.S. strategy are all entering a far more dangerous phase. If you want to understand what’s happening — not the headlines — watch the full clip. Watch here. ⬇️ 🏷️#IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavisDeepDive #ForeignPolicy #Iran #StraitOfHormuz

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

11,584 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🛑 A genuine risk the U.S. could suffer outright military defeat in Iran war I lay out a stark warning: the U.S. is burning through its offensive and defensive missile stockpiles and sleepwalking toward a strategic defeat in the Iran war. ⚠️ In this clip, I explain that Admiral Cooper’s plan to “step up air attacks” and “diminish Iran’s missile capability” is fantasy — “you’re going to use up what little of our offensive long‑range strike that we have… and then we got nothing" in return - except perhaps for a deeper loss. I show how the U.S. is fighting “with one hand tied behind our back” -- as a result of diminished arsenals (owing to our foolish decision to burn through them in pursuit of an unwinnable war) -- while Iran fights on home territory with a full arsenal of missiles and drones. I make clear that continuing this war is “insane,” and that every day of delay of making the rational decision to end the war makes it harder to reverse the damage. “There is a genuine risk of an outright military defeat" if we run so low on missiles we can't defend against even Iranian drones, much less sophisticated ballistic missiles. And I warn that the fallout extends far beyond the battlefield — from refinery destruction to global shortages in “fertilizers, helium, aluminum… gas fields, oil fields, refinement capacity.” This is the most direct assessment yet of how U.S. strategy is collapsing — and what comes next if we don’t change course. Watch the full clip. ▶️ 🏷️#IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #MissileDefense #Geopolitics #StraitOfHormuz #CENTCOM #EnergyCrisis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

16,214 просмотров • 4 дней назад

🚨The world would be catapulted into a GREAT DEPRESSION if US-Iran negotiations fail and result in a FOREVER WAR —Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. William J. Astore ‘I don’t think Iran trusts us at all. And I wouldn’t blame them. I don’t trust the news coming out of my own government. So why should Iran trust diplomats? We don’t even send diplomats. We send Trump’s son-in-law and we send a friend of Trump and a real estate developer. So we don’t even rely on the professionals within our own State Department. But I think Iran is being prudent. Iran recognises, I think, as sane people do, that diplomacy is better than a forever war where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people may end up dead. What’s so worrisome here is that we Americans, and our president…they all talk about short wars, they all talk about mission accomplished moments. ‘Oh yes, the war will be over in a few weeks, maybe a few months.’ We heard the same kind of rhetoric during the Vietnam War that, once we sent troops in 1965, that war would be over once American troops hit the ground. Well, that war stretched for another 10 years and we ended up losing that war. So this is always the rhetoric. And what I worry about the Iran war is that, yes, we’d like to think the war will be over soon, but we also thought the Russia-Ukraine war was going to be over in a matter of weeks or months and now it’s more than four years. I perish the thought that the Iran war could last a year or two or three. It would catapult the world into something like a Great Depression.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

38,254 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."

Eva Karene Bartlett

23,102 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 Iran Holds the Initiative in the Middle East Conflict Iran now holds the initiative. Brent crude has climbed back above $110 a barrel. Fertilizers and LNG remain clogged behind the Strait and global agriculture inches towards a major crisis. The president is issuing statement after statement implying we've already won the war w Iran, yet even members of his own party turn against him. The longer this conflict drags on, the better it seems to work in Iran’s favor. The administration is building up tens of thousands of U.S. troops and presents this this troop surge as the “final blow"; a sober military analysis, however, reveals its a relative tiny troop contingent, and against a country four times bigger than Iraq, not enough to make even a tactical impact, and definitely won't inflict a 'final blow.' Matt Hoh (Matthew Hoh; Eisenhower Media Network) cuts through the noise: "Anyone who believes the IRGC would collapse because of lost revenue doesn’t understand the situation" and even a cursory analysis of Iran's geography would see that it overwhelmingly advantages the defense. We would likely be cut to ribbons if we attempt to send ground troops in, no matter what the number. Why Iran Benefits as the Conflict Drags On— raw truth on U.S. strategy and the Iran war. Watch the full clip: 👉 #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #MattHoh #IranInitiative #OilPrices #Escalation #Geopolitics

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

14,411 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад