正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

📺 Why Uranium Might Be The Next Big Trade In this Short video, Connor Bates highlights #uranium as a major emerging theme, noting a multi-decade cup-and-handle breakout that suggests the move is still very early in a new uptrend. Price action across multiple uranium ETFs $U.UN $URA and miners...

RevereAsset's profile picture

Revere Asset Management

4,130 subscribers

49,562 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术财经#uranium
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

On today's Commodity Culture, Arthur B. from xU3O8 sees the massive shift that has taken place worldwide when it comes to the nuclear renaissance, as governments and policy makers are increasingly viewing nuclear energy as a must-have aspect of their power grids, and uranium is starting to be considered a critical mineral. Arthur points out that the supply-demand imbalance is staggering, and the uranium price has to go higher to fuel the world's nuclear fleet as it continues to develop. Arthur also introduces xU3O8, a new way to own physical uranium directly through blockchain technology, a potential game-changer for the industry. xU3O8: Disclaimer: Commodity Culture was compensated by xU3O8 for producing this interview. Nothing contained in this video is to be construed as investment advice, do your own due diligence. #uranium
19:48

On today's Commodity Culture, Arthur B. from xU3O8 sees the massive shift that has taken place worldwide when it comes to the nuclear renaissance, as governments and policy makers are increasingly viewing nuclear energy as a must-have aspect of their power grids, and uranium is starting to be considered a critical mineral. Arthur points out that the supply-demand imbalance is staggering, and the uranium price has to go higher to fuel the world's nuclear fleet as it continues to develop. Arthur also introduces xU3O8, a new way to own physical uranium directly through blockchain technology, a potential game-changer for the industry. xU3O8: Disclaimer: Commodity Culture was compensated by xU3O8 for producing this interview. Nothing contained in this video is to be construed as investment advice, do your own due diligence. #uranium

Jesse Day

21,911 次观看 • 1 年前

Everyone's focused on oil right now. And I get it. Brent above $100, the Strait of Hormuz shut down, tankers stranded. But there's an energy crisis hiding in plain sight that could be even MORE consequential: Uranium. Here are the numbers you should know: Global uranium demand is roughly 90,000 tons per year. Global production is 60,000 tons. That's a 30,000-ton annual DEFICIT. So how has the market survived so far? Utilities have been burning through their inventories. After Fukushima, Japan shut its reactors. Sweden pulled back. Germany closed its fleet entirely. Those utilities had 12 to 15 years of uranium stockpiled. Today, the average inventory level is just TWO YEARS. The cushion is gone. And demand is about to explode. There are roughly 200 new reactors planned globally by 2040. Each reactor consumes about 160 tons of raw uranium per year. That's 32,000 tons of additional annual demand. Half of one year's current production. Just from new reactors. And where does the supply come from? Well... it doesn't. Kazakhstan produces 45% of the world's uranium. Starting in 2028, Kazakhstan plans to dedicate 100% of its supply to China and Russia. Already 80% goes to those two countries. But that remaining 20% disappearing from the open market will tighten an already desperate situation. There aren't enough new mine projects to fill the gap. Mining is hard. Permitting takes years. And the world hasn't invested seriously in new uranium production for over a decade. But here's the part that's REALLY scary: Enriched uranium. Raw uranium is useless for a reactor. It has to be enriched. And 60% of the world's enrichment capacity sits in Russia. If Putin decided to embargo enriched uranium exports, it would be devastating for Western utilities. And strategically, it would cost Russia almost nothing. Russia's enrichment business generates roughly $6 billion a year. That's what Russia earns from ONE WEEK of oil sales. Why Putin hasn't pulled this lever yet is a mystery. But the vulnerability is real and every Western utility executive knows it. This is why we're bullish on uranium. Uranium spot prices are around $87 per pound. $200 per pound by 2027 or 2028 is entirely achievable given the supply-demand math. The oil trade gets the headlines. But people overlook uranium. A 30,000-ton annual deficit. Utility inventories at two years. Kazakhstan redirecting supply to China. Russia controlling 60% of enrichment. And 200 new reactors coming online. THE MATH DOESN'T LIE
2:15

Everyone's focused on oil right now. And I get it. Brent above $100, the Strait of Hormuz shut down, tankers stranded. But there's an energy crisis hiding in plain sight that could be even MORE consequential: Uranium. Here are the numbers you should know: Global uranium demand is roughly 90,000 tons per year. Global production is 60,000 tons. That's a 30,000-ton annual DEFICIT. So how has the market survived so far? Utilities have been burning through their inventories. After Fukushima, Japan shut its reactors. Sweden pulled back. Germany closed its fleet entirely. Those utilities had 12 to 15 years of uranium stockpiled. Today, the average inventory level is just TWO YEARS. The cushion is gone. And demand is about to explode. There are roughly 200 new reactors planned globally by 2040. Each reactor consumes about 160 tons of raw uranium per year. That's 32,000 tons of additional annual demand. Half of one year's current production. Just from new reactors. And where does the supply come from? Well... it doesn't. Kazakhstan produces 45% of the world's uranium. Starting in 2028, Kazakhstan plans to dedicate 100% of its supply to China and Russia. Already 80% goes to those two countries. But that remaining 20% disappearing from the open market will tighten an already desperate situation. There aren't enough new mine projects to fill the gap. Mining is hard. Permitting takes years. And the world hasn't invested seriously in new uranium production for over a decade. But here's the part that's REALLY scary: Enriched uranium. Raw uranium is useless for a reactor. It has to be enriched. And 60% of the world's enrichment capacity sits in Russia. If Putin decided to embargo enriched uranium exports, it would be devastating for Western utilities. And strategically, it would cost Russia almost nothing. Russia's enrichment business generates roughly $6 billion a year. That's what Russia earns from ONE WEEK of oil sales. Why Putin hasn't pulled this lever yet is a mystery. But the vulnerability is real and every Western utility executive knows it. This is why we're bullish on uranium. Uranium spot prices are around $87 per pound. $200 per pound by 2027 or 2028 is entirely achievable given the supply-demand math. The oil trade gets the headlines. But people overlook uranium. A 30,000-ton annual deficit. Utility inventories at two years. Kazakhstan redirecting supply to China. Russia controlling 60% of enrichment. And 200 new reactors coming online. THE MATH DOESN'T LIE

George Noble

47,749 次观看 • 6 个月前

HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again.. 🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria, Listen closely to Trump said in May. Obama and Hillary Clinton are SCREWED! —— “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? To understand what is happening, you have to Revisit the drops— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? KABOOM💥💥💥💥💥💥 What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? Hello 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? ( Q answers: YES. Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This means Obama and the Hillary Clinton Foundation–linked deal DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. 🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages. Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed. Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor. In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+). Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity”
0:55

HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again.. 🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria, Listen closely to Trump said in May. Obama and Hillary Clinton are SCREWED! —— “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? To understand what is happening, you have to Revisit the drops— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? KABOOM💥💥💥💥💥💥 What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? Hello 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? ( Q answers: YES. Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This means Obama and the Hillary Clinton Foundation–linked deal DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. 🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages. Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed. Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor. In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+). Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity”

MJTruthUltra

213,421 次观看 • 1 个月前

I will CHANGE your life. If you want to become a multi-millionaire in LESS than a decade, listen to me. Once the AI-trade takes a breather, the NEXT super-cycle will rotate into nuclear-related stocks: 1. Layer 1 - uranium miners • $CCJ - Cameco (blue chip uranium provider) • $UEC - Uranium Energy Corp. (aggressive U.S. developer) • $UUUU - Energy Fuels (only conventional U.S. mill) • $DNN - Dennison Mines (Wheeler River/Phoenix ISR project advancing to construction) 2. Layer 2 - fuel cycle / enrichment (the real bottleneck - especially HALEU and SMRs) • $ASPI - ASP Isotopes (using proprietary quantum enrichment tech to produce HALEU) • $LEU - Centrus Energy Corp. (only US company producing HALEU, big Department of Energy money) • $BWXT - BWX Technologies (reactor components + services + defensive overlap) 3. Layer 3 - SMR & advanced reactors (highest risk-to-reward; the picks & shovels of the future) • $OKLO - Oklo (Sam Altman-backed, already signed $META deal) • $SMR - NuScale Power (first US - approved SMR design) • $NNE - Nano Nuclear (microreactors - portable power) • $IMSR - Terrestrial Energy (heat + power hybrid) • $GEV - GE Vernova (BWRX-300 SMR tech + nuclear services Safer ETF's include: 4. Layer 4 - nuclear operators / utilities (real cash-flow and massive data center contracts) • $CEG - Constellation Energy (largest US nuclear fleet) • $DUK - Duke Energy (best risk-adjusted layer 4 name) • $VST - Vistra (insane $META 20-year PPA and nuclear restarts) ETF's include $URA, $URNM, and $NLR. Please invite me to your yacht once I make you $4M.
4:25

I will CHANGE your life. If you want to become a multi-millionaire in LESS than a decade, listen to me. Once the AI-trade takes a breather, the NEXT super-cycle will rotate into nuclear-related stocks: 1. Layer 1 - uranium miners • $CCJ - Cameco (blue chip uranium provider) • $UEC - Uranium Energy Corp. (aggressive U.S. developer) • $UUUU - Energy Fuels (only conventional U.S. mill) • $DNN - Dennison Mines (Wheeler River/Phoenix ISR project advancing to construction) 2. Layer 2 - fuel cycle / enrichment (the real bottleneck - especially HALEU and SMRs) • $ASPI - ASP Isotopes (using proprietary quantum enrichment tech to produce HALEU) • $LEU - Centrus Energy Corp. (only US company producing HALEU, big Department of Energy money) • $BWXT - BWX Technologies (reactor components + services + defensive overlap) 3. Layer 3 - SMR & advanced reactors (highest risk-to-reward; the picks & shovels of the future) • $OKLO - Oklo (Sam Altman-backed, already signed $META deal) • $SMR - NuScale Power (first US - approved SMR design) • $NNE - Nano Nuclear (microreactors - portable power) • $IMSR - Terrestrial Energy (heat + power hybrid) • $GEV - GE Vernova (BWRX-300 SMR tech + nuclear services Safer ETF's include: 4. Layer 4 - nuclear operators / utilities (real cash-flow and massive data center contracts) • $CEG - Constellation Energy (largest US nuclear fleet) • $DUK - Duke Energy (best risk-adjusted layer 4 name) • $VST - Vistra (insane $META 20-year PPA and nuclear restarts) ETF's include $URA, $URNM, and $NLR. Please invite me to your yacht once I make you $4M.

AskLivermore

232,224 次观看 • 4 个月前

I will CHANGE your life. If you want to become a multi-millionaire in LESS than a decade, listen to me. Once the AI-trade takes a breather, the NEXT super-cycle will rotate into nuclear-related stocks: 1. Layer 1 - uranium miners • $CCJ - Cameco (blue chip uranium provider) • $UEC - Uranium Energy Corp. (aggressive U.S. developer) • $UUUU - Energy Fuels (only conventional U.S. mill) • $DNN - Dennison Mines (Wheeler River/Phoenix ISR project advancing to construction) 2. Layer 2 - fuel cycle / enrichment (the real bottleneck - especially HALEU and SMRs) • $ASPI - ASP Isotopes (using proprietary quantum enrichment tech to produce HALEU) • $LEU - Centrus Energy Corp. (only US company producing HALEU, big Department of Energy money) • $BWXT - BWX Technologies (reactor components + services + defensive overlap) 3. Layer 3 - SMR & advanced reactors (highest risk-to-reward; the picks & shovels of the future) • $OKLO - Oklo (Sam Altman-backed, already signed $META deal) • $SMR - NuScale Power (first US - approved SMR design) • $NNE - Nano Nuclear (microreactors - portable power) • $IMSR - Terrestrial Energy (heat + power hybrid) • $GEV - GE Vernova (BWRX-300 SMR tech + nuclear services Safer ETF's include: 4. Layer 4 - nuclear operators / utilities (real cash-flow and massive data center contracts) • $CEG - Constellation Energy (largest US nuclear fleet) • $DUK - Duke Energy (best risk-adjusted layer 4 name) • $VST - Vistra (insane $META 20-year PPA and nuclear restarts) ETF's include $URA, $URNM, and $NLR. Please invite me to your yacht once I make you $4M
4:25

I will CHANGE your life. If you want to become a multi-millionaire in LESS than a decade, listen to me. Once the AI-trade takes a breather, the NEXT super-cycle will rotate into nuclear-related stocks: 1. Layer 1 - uranium miners • $CCJ - Cameco (blue chip uranium provider) • $UEC - Uranium Energy Corp. (aggressive U.S. developer) • $UUUU - Energy Fuels (only conventional U.S. mill) • $DNN - Dennison Mines (Wheeler River/Phoenix ISR project advancing to construction) 2. Layer 2 - fuel cycle / enrichment (the real bottleneck - especially HALEU and SMRs) • $ASPI - ASP Isotopes (using proprietary quantum enrichment tech to produce HALEU) • $LEU - Centrus Energy Corp. (only US company producing HALEU, big Department of Energy money) • $BWXT - BWX Technologies (reactor components + services + defensive overlap) 3. Layer 3 - SMR & advanced reactors (highest risk-to-reward; the picks & shovels of the future) • $OKLO - Oklo (Sam Altman-backed, already signed $META deal) • $SMR - NuScale Power (first US - approved SMR design) • $NNE - Nano Nuclear (microreactors - portable power) • $IMSR - Terrestrial Energy (heat + power hybrid) • $GEV - GE Vernova (BWRX-300 SMR tech + nuclear services Safer ETF's include: 4. Layer 4 - nuclear operators / utilities (real cash-flow and massive data center contracts) • $CEG - Constellation Energy (largest US nuclear fleet) • $DUK - Duke Energy (best risk-adjusted layer 4 name) • $VST - Vistra (insane $META 20-year PPA and nuclear restarts) ETF's include $URA, $URNM, and $NLR. Please invite me to your yacht once I make you $4M

Livermore (Private)

46,193 次观看 • 4 个月前

#WATCH | Dr Ashok Sharma, Additional Professor, AIIMS Delhi says, "This study is conducted at Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna and AIIMS New Delhi jointly. The outcome of this study showed that, when we analysed breast milk from 40 lactating mothers, we found Uranium-238 in all samples. Although 70% of infants show potential non-carcinogenic health risks, the overall uranium levels were below the permissible limits, i.e. 30 micrograms per litre as per the WHO, and are expected to have minimal actual health impact on both mothers and infants. The highest average contamination occurred in Khagaria district, which is 5.25 micrograms per litre and lowest contamination in the Nalanda district, 2.35 microgram per litre. While uranium exposure may pose risks such as impaired neurological development and reduced IQ, breastfeeding should not be discontinued...Yes, we are in the process of examining heavy metals in other states and their impact on human health, which is a global need. Our study showed that 70 % of the infants had an IQ of less than 1, indicating a possible non-carcinogenic health risk from uranium exposure through breast milk. Uranium exposure in infants may affect kidney development, neurological development, cognitive and mental health outcomes, including low IQ and neurodevelopmental delay if long-term exposure continues. However, based on our observations, the uranium concentration in the breast milk sample is 5.25 micrograms per litre, which is well below the WHO permissible limit. The study still concludes that the actual impact of the infant's health is likely low, and most uranium absorbed by the mother is excreted primarily through urine, not concentrated in the breast milk. Therefore, breastfeeding remains recommended unless a clinical indication suggests otherwise..." (Source: Self-made)
2:45

#WATCH | Dr Ashok Sharma, Additional Professor, AIIMS Delhi says, "This study is conducted at Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna and AIIMS New Delhi jointly. The outcome of this study showed that, when we analysed breast milk from 40 lactating mothers, we found Uranium-238 in all samples. Although 70% of infants show potential non-carcinogenic health risks, the overall uranium levels were below the permissible limits, i.e. 30 micrograms per litre as per the WHO, and are expected to have minimal actual health impact on both mothers and infants. The highest average contamination occurred in Khagaria district, which is 5.25 micrograms per litre and lowest contamination in the Nalanda district, 2.35 microgram per litre. While uranium exposure may pose risks such as impaired neurological development and reduced IQ, breastfeeding should not be discontinued...Yes, we are in the process of examining heavy metals in other states and their impact on human health, which is a global need. Our study showed that 70 % of the infants had an IQ of less than 1, indicating a possible non-carcinogenic health risk from uranium exposure through breast milk. Uranium exposure in infants may affect kidney development, neurological development, cognitive and mental health outcomes, including low IQ and neurodevelopmental delay if long-term exposure continues. However, based on our observations, the uranium concentration in the breast milk sample is 5.25 micrograms per litre, which is well below the WHO permissible limit. The study still concludes that the actual impact of the infant's health is likely low, and most uranium absorbed by the mother is excreted primarily through urine, not concentrated in the breast milk. Therefore, breastfeeding remains recommended unless a clinical indication suggests otherwise..." (Source: Self-made)

ANI

66,964 次观看 • 10 个月前

Hillary Clinton sold our uranium to Russia. Russia gave some of that uranium to Iran. President Trump then had to wipe out the Iranian regime and democrats barked at him for cleaning up the mess that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama was responsible for — arming enemies of the United States of America. That's Treason. The money from that Uranium One sale went through the Clinton Foundation. CNN's Jake Tapper was a CIA media asset for Barack Obama's DNI James Clapper to leak FAKE Russia collision propaganda tying Donald Trump to Russia for helped him hack the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton. Those were all lies to try and impeach Trump and then sway voters away from Donald Trump in the following election. Although Hillary Clinton got wealthy by selling off America piece by piece, President Trump is in a very strategic position to teach her that Treason Doesn't Pay Well In The End. Obama spying on President Trump - Jeffrey Epstein - PizzaGate - Pedophile Rings - Child Trafficking Rings - Clinton Foundation - Crossfire Hurricane - Russia Collusion HOAX - Uranium One - it's ALL intertwined as an interconnected web within the Clinton Foundation. The REAL Russia Collusion was involving the Clinton - Pedophile John Podesta - Obama administration and Frank Giustra, whom also founded Lionsgate, a MASSIVE global media company and a YUGE Pedo-Wood production conglomerate! A Uranium One Primer – Clinton Foundation - Frank Giustra & Kazakhstan’s Uranium Assets: Bill Clinton met Canadian investor Frank Giustra in June 2005, during a fund-raiser at Mr. Giustra’s Vancouver home. Frank Giustra owned UrAsia, a small, newly formed, Uranium company that was seeking to purchase lucrative uranium reserves in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan has about 1/5 of the world’s uranium reserves. Clinton & Giustra had a private meeting with Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev on September 6, 2005. Frank Giustra donated a total of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. The donations appeared to be directly tied to the series of transactions involving UrAsia, Kazatomprom, Uranium One & ultimately, Rosatom (Russia’s Nuclear Agency) $31.3 million came directly after the closing of the UrAsia/Kazatomprom transaction in early 2006. Giustra pledged another $100 million in June 2007, after the closing of Uranium One’s acquisition of Giustra’s company, UrAsia. Another $2.3 million was paid to the Clinton Foundation by Ian Telfer, the Chairman of Uranium One. Between $1.3 million & $5.6 million in contributions came from multiple people with ties to Uranium One / UrAsia. The agreement transformed UrAsia from a small unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers overnight. The deal with Kazakhstan made Giustra’s company, Uranium One, a major player. It proceeded to buy large amounts of holdings in the United States. Uranium One thus became an attractive target for Russia as Russia then made a hugely attractive offer to purchase the company. Such a deal requires approval by the U.S. government — specifically — by the Secretary of State, who then was Hillary Clinton. During the period when the deal with Russia was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from key Uranium One shareholders. 4 months later, Giustra made the $31.3 million donation to the Clinton Foundation. In September 2006, Giustra co-hosted Bill Clinton’s 60th birthday, an event that raised $21 million for the Clinton Foundation. During this period, Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank. These criminals are responsible
7:49

Hillary Clinton sold our uranium to Russia. Russia gave some of that uranium to Iran. President Trump then had to wipe out the Iranian regime and democrats barked at him for cleaning up the mess that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama was responsible for — arming enemies of the United States of America. That's Treason. The money from that Uranium One sale went through the Clinton Foundation. CNN's Jake Tapper was a CIA media asset for Barack Obama's DNI James Clapper to leak FAKE Russia collision propaganda tying Donald Trump to Russia for helped him hack the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton. Those were all lies to try and impeach Trump and then sway voters away from Donald Trump in the following election. Although Hillary Clinton got wealthy by selling off America piece by piece, President Trump is in a very strategic position to teach her that Treason Doesn't Pay Well In The End. Obama spying on President Trump - Jeffrey Epstein - PizzaGate - Pedophile Rings - Child Trafficking Rings - Clinton Foundation - Crossfire Hurricane - Russia Collusion HOAX - Uranium One - it's ALL intertwined as an interconnected web within the Clinton Foundation. The REAL Russia Collusion was involving the Clinton - Pedophile John Podesta - Obama administration and Frank Giustra, whom also founded Lionsgate, a MASSIVE global media company and a YUGE Pedo-Wood production conglomerate! A Uranium One Primer – Clinton Foundation - Frank Giustra & Kazakhstan’s Uranium Assets: Bill Clinton met Canadian investor Frank Giustra in June 2005, during a fund-raiser at Mr. Giustra’s Vancouver home. Frank Giustra owned UrAsia, a small, newly formed, Uranium company that was seeking to purchase lucrative uranium reserves in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan has about 1/5 of the world’s uranium reserves. Clinton & Giustra had a private meeting with Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev on September 6, 2005. Frank Giustra donated a total of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. The donations appeared to be directly tied to the series of transactions involving UrAsia, Kazatomprom, Uranium One & ultimately, Rosatom (Russia’s Nuclear Agency) $31.3 million came directly after the closing of the UrAsia/Kazatomprom transaction in early 2006. Giustra pledged another $100 million in June 2007, after the closing of Uranium One’s acquisition of Giustra’s company, UrAsia. Another $2.3 million was paid to the Clinton Foundation by Ian Telfer, the Chairman of Uranium One. Between $1.3 million & $5.6 million in contributions came from multiple people with ties to Uranium One / UrAsia. The agreement transformed UrAsia from a small unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers overnight. The deal with Kazakhstan made Giustra’s company, Uranium One, a major player. It proceeded to buy large amounts of holdings in the United States. Uranium One thus became an attractive target for Russia as Russia then made a hugely attractive offer to purchase the company. Such a deal requires approval by the U.S. government — specifically — by the Secretary of State, who then was Hillary Clinton. During the period when the deal with Russia was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from key Uranium One shareholders. 4 months later, Giustra made the $31.3 million donation to the Clinton Foundation. In September 2006, Giustra co-hosted Bill Clinton’s 60th birthday, an event that raised $21 million for the Clinton Foundation. During this period, Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank. These criminals are responsible

Bridgett Fertig

68,913 次观看 • 6 个月前

Scott Nolan (Scott Nolan ) was employee ~30 at SpaceX. He spent over a decade at Founders Fund backing Anduril, Radiant, and Crusoe Energy. In 2023, he went looking for a company enriching uranium domestically. There was none. So he started General Matter (General Matter ). The U.S. once produced 86% of the world's enriched uranium. By 2013 it was zero. Russia filled the gap. China is scaling fast. Meanwhile, every advanced reactor company in America was hitting the same wall: no domestic fuel supply. General Matter is changing that. $900M DOE contract. First facility in Paducah, Kentucky, the exact site where the U.S. last enriched uranium. And just weeks ago in Tokyo, a $2.4B EXIM financing deal to supply Japanese utilities. Why is this important to Japan? Because 70% of Japan's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Because Japan currently imports all its enriched uranium from Europe. Because Japan has been burned by energy dependency in 1941, the 1970s, and right now. One pellet of enriched uranium contains as much energy as 100 barrels of oil. You can stockpile it for years. The energy density alone makes nuclear the most defensible base load option for an import-dependent economy. I sat down with Scott over sushi in Tokyo to talk about all of this. Enjoy. (00:00) Intro (01:17) The $2.4B EXIM Deal (04:43) Why General Matter Had to Be Started (11:51) The Uranium Supply Chain (15:40) SpaceX and Nuclear: The Parallel (19:54) Japan's Energy Security (25:58) Safety Myths and Next-Gen Reactors (31:10) Enrichment Economics (37:18) The SpaceX Approach to Cheaper Enrichment (46:43) Japan Supply Chain Partnership (56:50) Why Peter Thiel Joined the Board (01:02:10) Founders Fund on Japan (01:09:02) Definite Optimism and the Anduril Playbook (01:13:10) General Matter's Culture (01:15:27) Five-Year Scaling Plan
1:18:23

Scott Nolan (Scott Nolan ) was employee ~30 at SpaceX. He spent over a decade at Founders Fund backing Anduril, Radiant, and Crusoe Energy. In 2023, he went looking for a company enriching uranium domestically. There was none. So he started General Matter (General Matter ). The U.S. once produced 86% of the world's enriched uranium. By 2013 it was zero. Russia filled the gap. China is scaling fast. Meanwhile, every advanced reactor company in America was hitting the same wall: no domestic fuel supply. General Matter is changing that. $900M DOE contract. First facility in Paducah, Kentucky, the exact site where the U.S. last enriched uranium. And just weeks ago in Tokyo, a $2.4B EXIM financing deal to supply Japanese utilities. Why is this important to Japan? Because 70% of Japan's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Because Japan currently imports all its enriched uranium from Europe. Because Japan has been burned by energy dependency in 1941, the 1970s, and right now. One pellet of enriched uranium contains as much energy as 100 barrels of oil. You can stockpile it for years. The energy density alone makes nuclear the most defensible base load option for an import-dependent economy. I sat down with Scott over sushi in Tokyo to talk about all of this. Enjoy. (00:00) Intro (01:17) The $2.4B EXIM Deal (04:43) Why General Matter Had to Be Started (11:51) The Uranium Supply Chain (15:40) SpaceX and Nuclear: The Parallel (19:54) Japan's Energy Security (25:58) Safety Myths and Next-Gen Reactors (31:10) Enrichment Economics (37:18) The SpaceX Approach to Cheaper Enrichment (46:43) Japan Supply Chain Partnership (56:50) Why Peter Thiel Joined the Board (01:02:10) Founders Fund on Japan (01:09:02) Definite Optimism and the Anduril Playbook (01:13:10) General Matter's Culture (01:15:27) Five-Year Scaling Plan

James Riney🐠Coral Capital

198,033 次观看 • 5 个月前

📺 $TSLA STILL STRONG BUT EXTENDED – YOU SHOULDN’T BE BUYING HERE Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla closed strong last week at $428.35. The stock is in a rising channel, with momentum still intact. However, it’s approaching a major resistance zone that could define the next multi-week move. * $442.26 – $444.99 is the critical area, which aligns with the rising channel top and is expected to cap price action through May and possibly June. Base case is #TSLA likely tests this zone this week, then struggles to break higher immediately. Expect then a pullback toward $418 (short-term) and $387.07 (key support), with the potential deeper move toward $347.63 (major support / Q3 bottom zone). * If $TSLA closes this week above $444.99, that’s a confirmed breakout that triggers a momentum “pull-away” move. Upside targets: – $498.83 (December high retest) → within 3–8 weeks – $541.30 → within 2–5 months Note: this only happens on confirmed strength, not intraday spikes. If $TSLA fails at $442–445, expect rotation lower. If it closes the week below $415.83, it will signal a short-term top and open the door to $387.07 (primary target) and potential acceleration lower. * So, what NOT to do: – Don’t chase in the low $440 s – that’s resistance, not opportunity. What to do instead: – Short-term traders may sell / short into $442–445 resistance. Target is $418 (quick trade) and $387 (swing trade). Alternative short trigger: breakdown below $415.83 → short continuation. – Long strategy: stay long above $418, buy dips at $387 (high-probability level) and possibly $347 (if deeper correction). – Breakout buyers: only get aggressive if confirmed close above $444.99. * So, $TSLA is still strong but extended. $442–445 is the decision zone: – Rejection → pullback and range – Breakout → fast move toward $500+ The smart play here isn’t chasing strength — it’s trading the levels and letting the market confirm direction. * Watch the full Trading Plan for May 11, 2026 in this short video🔽
2:55

📺 $TSLA STILL STRONG BUT EXTENDED – YOU SHOULDN’T BE BUYING HERE Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla closed strong last week at $428.35. The stock is in a rising channel, with momentum still intact. However, it’s approaching a major resistance zone that could define the next multi-week move. * $442.26 – $444.99 is the critical area, which aligns with the rising channel top and is expected to cap price action through May and possibly June. Base case is #TSLA likely tests this zone this week, then struggles to break higher immediately. Expect then a pullback toward $418 (short-term) and $387.07 (key support), with the potential deeper move toward $347.63 (major support / Q3 bottom zone). * If $TSLA closes this week above $444.99, that’s a confirmed breakout that triggers a momentum “pull-away” move. Upside targets: – $498.83 (December high retest) → within 3–8 weeks – $541.30 → within 2–5 months Note: this only happens on confirmed strength, not intraday spikes. If $TSLA fails at $442–445, expect rotation lower. If it closes the week below $415.83, it will signal a short-term top and open the door to $387.07 (primary target) and potential acceleration lower. * So, what NOT to do: – Don’t chase in the low $440 s – that’s resistance, not opportunity. What to do instead: – Short-term traders may sell / short into $442–445 resistance. Target is $418 (quick trade) and $387 (swing trade). Alternative short trigger: breakdown below $415.83 → short continuation. – Long strategy: stay long above $418, buy dips at $387 (high-probability level) and possibly $347 (if deeper correction). – Breakout buyers: only get aggressive if confirmed close above $444.99. * So, $TSLA is still strong but extended. $442–445 is the decision zone: – Rejection → pullback and range – Breakout → fast move toward $500+ The smart play here isn’t chasing strength — it’s trading the levels and letting the market confirm direction. * Watch the full Trading Plan for May 11, 2026 in this short video🔽

Wicked Stocks

29,516 次观看 • 4 个月前

Listen very closely to what Trump says re: Obama and Iran… “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? Revisit— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell anons without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA to build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? And the explosive twist: What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material — and says this real-world scenario would be “SUM OF ALL FEARS” level dangerous. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? (Q answers: YES.) Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. WHY do you think Trump wants that Nuclear Dust? Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. Bottom-Line Implication U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This is true, and it is now being revisited and it would mean the Clinton Foundation–linked deal (which Grassley’s recent letter is now re-examining) didn’t just risk U.S. security — they DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. As Q later clarified in the 16 year plan to destroy America, MASS Extinction events via war were being planned. Until Trump won in 2016.
0:55

Listen very closely to what Trump says re: Obama and Iran… “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? Revisit— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell anons without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA to build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? And the explosive twist: What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material — and says this real-world scenario would be “SUM OF ALL FEARS” level dangerous. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? (Q answers: YES.) Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. WHY do you think Trump wants that Nuclear Dust? Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. Bottom-Line Implication U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This is true, and it is now being revisited and it would mean the Clinton Foundation–linked deal (which Grassley’s recent letter is now re-examining) didn’t just risk U.S. security — they DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. As Q later clarified in the 16 year plan to destroy America, MASS Extinction events via war were being planned. Until Trump won in 2016.

MJTruthUltra

187,591 次观看 • 4 个月前

📺 $TSLA IS ABOUT TO MAKE ITS NEXT BIG MOVE Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla recently bottomed at a major 1-year channel support around $338.27, which acted as a critical turning point. Since that test, the stock has staged a sharp recovery. This bounce is viewed as structurally bullish, with expectations for a continued move higher over the coming weeks to months. * The most important near-term level is $384.48, the former descending channel top. #TSLA has closed above this level, signaling a secondary buy confirmation. As long as price holds above $384.48 on a daily closing basis, the bullish structure remains intact. * If $TSLA continues to hold strength: – $401.93 is the immediate trigger level. A close above this confirms momentum and forces shorts to cover. – $418.04 is the near-term target (50% retracement), expected within 1–3 days after breakout. – 432.90 is the primary upside target, expected within 2–3 weeks. It is a major resistance level where the price could stall or reverse. – $440s–$450s are extended targets into May–June. * If you are SHORT: From the $380s → a close above $401.93 is a clear exit signal. Likely need to flip long as momentum accelerates. If you are LONG: $401.93 breakout is the confirmation entry trigger. Expect to ride the move toward $432.90 over the weeks. * If $TSLA fails to hold $384.48 today, this would trigger a sell signal back down to $338.27 within 1–2 weeks. That would represent a full retrace to channel support and could lead to longer-term basing before another attempt higher. In this case, recent longs should exit, and traders may flip short, targeting $338. * The broader structure suggests a range between $338 and $432 in the near term. After reaching $432, $TLSA may become overbought with a potential for a pullback or consolidation. * Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Apr 17, 2026 in this short video🔽
2:55

📺 $TSLA IS ABOUT TO MAKE ITS NEXT BIG MOVE Please ❤️like and 🔁share with fellow Tesla traders/investors #Tesla recently bottomed at a major 1-year channel support around $338.27, which acted as a critical turning point. Since that test, the stock has staged a sharp recovery. This bounce is viewed as structurally bullish, with expectations for a continued move higher over the coming weeks to months. * The most important near-term level is $384.48, the former descending channel top. #TSLA has closed above this level, signaling a secondary buy confirmation. As long as price holds above $384.48 on a daily closing basis, the bullish structure remains intact. * If $TSLA continues to hold strength: – $401.93 is the immediate trigger level. A close above this confirms momentum and forces shorts to cover. – $418.04 is the near-term target (50% retracement), expected within 1–3 days after breakout. – 432.90 is the primary upside target, expected within 2–3 weeks. It is a major resistance level where the price could stall or reverse. – $440s–$450s are extended targets into May–June. * If you are SHORT: From the $380s → a close above $401.93 is a clear exit signal. Likely need to flip long as momentum accelerates. If you are LONG: $401.93 breakout is the confirmation entry trigger. Expect to ride the move toward $432.90 over the weeks. * If $TSLA fails to hold $384.48 today, this would trigger a sell signal back down to $338.27 within 1–2 weeks. That would represent a full retrace to channel support and could lead to longer-term basing before another attempt higher. In this case, recent longs should exit, and traders may flip short, targeting $338. * The broader structure suggests a range between $338 and $432 in the near term. After reaching $432, $TLSA may become overbought with a potential for a pullback or consolidation. * Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Apr 17, 2026 in this short video🔽

Wicked Stocks

25,136 次观看 • 5 个月前

🏭 REINDUSTRIALIZATION & COMMODITIES: THE NEW AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY A tectonic shift is underway. The U.S. is no longer claiming global leadership—it's retreating to its own hemisphere. Here’s what this means for the future of power, commodities, and industry: THE GRAND STRATEGY: “WESTERN HEMISPHERE” IS THE NEW KEY PHRASE 🇺🇸 Official U.S. strategy documents now consistently refer to the “Western Hemisphere,” not the world. ➡️ This is a strategic admission: global dominance is unsustainable. The focus is now on a geographically defined sphere of control. ⚠️ The new National Security Strategy (NSS) is blunt: military strength is built on economic and industrial capacity. Without a strong production base, there is no military might. REINDUSTRIALIZATION = NATIONAL SECURITY ✅ The NSS declares reindustrialization the top national priority. ➡️ It calls for national mobilization, scaling arms production, reshoring critical supply chains, and preparing for a long-term systemic competition with China. 🛡️ The bedrock of American power is no longer the aircraft carrier—it’s the factory floor, the mine, and the semiconductor fab. 🔗 This is a return to a resource-based and production-centric view of power. HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE: THE “DONROE DOCTRINE” IN ACTION ✅ A modern, hardened version of the 1823 Monroe Doctrine is now U.S. policy. ➡️ The hemisphere is to be stabilized, controlled, and shielded from external powers. It will serve as the exclusive U.S. production space, resource zone, and security perimeter. 🇻🇪 The Venezuela operation was the clearest signal: absolute U.S. control in its backyard is non-negotiable. 🗺️ This means securing critical minerals, energy, and supply chains from Alaska to Argentina. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMODITY INVESTORS ➡️For commodity investors, this is a historic re-rating event. ➡️Capital will flood towards miners and developers that provide the secure, strategic supply that this new era of hemispheric competition desperately requires. ➡️Reindustrialization and hemispheric security require physical stuff. This mandates a multi-decade boom in demand for both energy commodities (oil, gas, uranium) and industrial & critical minerals (copper, nickel, silver, rare earths ecc.) Current personal portfolio for this commodity supercycle: (No investment advice - DYODD) Silver: $HL $EXK $AG $SCZ $AGMR $SSV $GSVR $ABRA $AAG $MGG $KTN $EQTY Gold: $TUD $GWM $PEX (Copper) Platinum/Gold/Lithium: $SBSW Nickel/Copper/Cobalt/PGE/Rhodium: $PGE.V Lithium: $BRW Uranium/REE: $UUUU Graphene: $HGRAF
1:19

🏭 REINDUSTRIALIZATION & COMMODITIES: THE NEW AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY A tectonic shift is underway. The U.S. is no longer claiming global leadership—it's retreating to its own hemisphere. Here’s what this means for the future of power, commodities, and industry: THE GRAND STRATEGY: “WESTERN HEMISPHERE” IS THE NEW KEY PHRASE 🇺🇸 Official U.S. strategy documents now consistently refer to the “Western Hemisphere,” not the world. ➡️ This is a strategic admission: global dominance is unsustainable. The focus is now on a geographically defined sphere of control. ⚠️ The new National Security Strategy (NSS) is blunt: military strength is built on economic and industrial capacity. Without a strong production base, there is no military might. REINDUSTRIALIZATION = NATIONAL SECURITY ✅ The NSS declares reindustrialization the top national priority. ➡️ It calls for national mobilization, scaling arms production, reshoring critical supply chains, and preparing for a long-term systemic competition with China. 🛡️ The bedrock of American power is no longer the aircraft carrier—it’s the factory floor, the mine, and the semiconductor fab. 🔗 This is a return to a resource-based and production-centric view of power. HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE: THE “DONROE DOCTRINE” IN ACTION ✅ A modern, hardened version of the 1823 Monroe Doctrine is now U.S. policy. ➡️ The hemisphere is to be stabilized, controlled, and shielded from external powers. It will serve as the exclusive U.S. production space, resource zone, and security perimeter. 🇻🇪 The Venezuela operation was the clearest signal: absolute U.S. control in its backyard is non-negotiable. 🗺️ This means securing critical minerals, energy, and supply chains from Alaska to Argentina. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMODITY INVESTORS ➡️For commodity investors, this is a historic re-rating event. ➡️Capital will flood towards miners and developers that provide the secure, strategic supply that this new era of hemispheric competition desperately requires. ➡️Reindustrialization and hemispheric security require physical stuff. This mandates a multi-decade boom in demand for both energy commodities (oil, gas, uranium) and industrial & critical minerals (copper, nickel, silver, rare earths ecc.) Current personal portfolio for this commodity supercycle: (No investment advice - DYODD) Silver: $HL $EXK $AG $SCZ $AGMR $SSV $GSVR $ABRA $AAG $MGG $KTN $EQTY Gold: $TUD $GWM $PEX (Copper) Platinum/Gold/Lithium: $SBSW Nickel/Copper/Cobalt/PGE/Rhodium: $PGE.V Lithium: $BRW Uranium/REE: $UUUU Graphene: $HGRAF

Mark

20,616 次观看 • 8 个月前

For decades, Africa’s uranium has powered the Global North’s nuclear reactors and arsenals, while almost no African states have been allowed to build nuclear deterrence of their own. The reason for this unfair arrangement is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), an agreement designed by the nations of the West to lock as many other nations out of nuclear power as possible, while the West gets to keep its arsenals. Though a new political wave is rising in Africa, led by the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), the continent is still bound by this treaty. This must change! Africa must wake up to the reality of its self-preservation in a world that has exploited it for too long.
2:30

For decades, Africa’s uranium has powered the Global North’s nuclear reactors and arsenals, while almost no African states have been allowed to build nuclear deterrence of their own. The reason for this unfair arrangement is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), an agreement designed by the nations of the West to lock as many other nations out of nuclear power as possible, while the West gets to keep its arsenals. Though a new political wave is rising in Africa, led by the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), the continent is still bound by this treaty. This must change! Africa must wake up to the reality of its self-preservation in a world that has exploited it for too long.

The Spearhead

24,905 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 NUCLEAR WARNING 🚨 IRAN JUST TOLD THE U.S. IT HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 11 NUCLEAR BOMBS. AND NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff just confirmed: Iran told American officials it possesses enough enriched uranium for approximately 11 nuclear weapons. That's not a typo. ELEVEN. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium → CONFIRMED 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 Satellite images show NEW excavation activity at Isfahan → Iran may be trying to RECOVER uranium from the bombed site 💀 The U.S. can't confirm whether Iran already MOVED the stockpile before strikes began 💀 Iran may DESTROY the material before U.S. forces can reach it → making verification IMPOSSIBLE ⚠️ Trump confirmed Iran was "2 weeks away" from a weapon BEFORE the war started ⚠️ The war has now been going for 10 DAYS ⚠️ That means the clock may have ALREADY run out ⚠️ U.S. and Israel discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES to seize or dilute the uranium ⚠️ "Doomsday" E-6B nuclear command planes already DEPLOYED to the Middle East They're showing you oil prices and destroyed warships. They're NOT showing you that 11 nuclear bombs' worth of enriched uranium is somewhere inside Iran and NOBODY knows exactly where. Here's the nightmare scenario nobody is talking about: → Iran has the uranium → The U.S. bombed the known storage sites → Iran may have MOVED it before the strikes → If it's underground or dispersed, air strikes CAN'T reach it → Ground troops would need to enter the MOST fortified country in the Middle East → With hundreds of thousands of armed IRGC fighters waiting → While $20,000 drones bleed the defense budget dry The last time the U.S. sent special forces into Iran → Operation Eagle Claw, 1980 → 8 Americans died. Zero objectives achieved. TOTAL FAILURE. Now they want to do it again. To find uranium that may have already been moved. In a country with a new radical Supreme Leader. While the military is stretched across 6 fronts. 11 bombs. Location UNKNOWN. And the clock is still ticking. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This won't stay on your feed long. Follow + RT NOW. ⚠️
1:16

🚨 NUCLEAR WARNING 🚨 IRAN JUST TOLD THE U.S. IT HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 11 NUCLEAR BOMBS. AND NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff just confirmed: Iran told American officials it possesses enough enriched uranium for approximately 11 nuclear weapons. That's not a typo. ELEVEN. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium → CONFIRMED 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 Satellite images show NEW excavation activity at Isfahan → Iran may be trying to RECOVER uranium from the bombed site 💀 The U.S. can't confirm whether Iran already MOVED the stockpile before strikes began 💀 Iran may DESTROY the material before U.S. forces can reach it → making verification IMPOSSIBLE ⚠️ Trump confirmed Iran was "2 weeks away" from a weapon BEFORE the war started ⚠️ The war has now been going for 10 DAYS ⚠️ That means the clock may have ALREADY run out ⚠️ U.S. and Israel discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES to seize or dilute the uranium ⚠️ "Doomsday" E-6B nuclear command planes already DEPLOYED to the Middle East They're showing you oil prices and destroyed warships. They're NOT showing you that 11 nuclear bombs' worth of enriched uranium is somewhere inside Iran and NOBODY knows exactly where. Here's the nightmare scenario nobody is talking about: → Iran has the uranium → The U.S. bombed the known storage sites → Iran may have MOVED it before the strikes → If it's underground or dispersed, air strikes CAN'T reach it → Ground troops would need to enter the MOST fortified country in the Middle East → With hundreds of thousands of armed IRGC fighters waiting → While $20,000 drones bleed the defense budget dry The last time the U.S. sent special forces into Iran → Operation Eagle Claw, 1980 → 8 Americans died. Zero objectives achieved. TOTAL FAILURE. Now they want to do it again. To find uranium that may have already been moved. In a country with a new radical Supreme Leader. While the military is stretched across 6 fronts. 11 bombs. Location UNKNOWN. And the clock is still ticking. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This won't stay on your feed long. Follow + RT NOW. ⚠️

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

25,105 次观看 • 6 个月前

📺 $TSLA ISN’T DONE FALLING — LOWER PRICE AHEAD #Tesla is in a confirmed longer-term sell signal after breaking below $425.88 about five weeks ago. That breakdown projects a primary downside target of $331.25, expected to be reached within the 2–3-month window (now about halfway through). Despite the bearish trend, $331.25 is seen as a major inflection point to take profits on shorts and go long, with the potential reversal back toward $420+ within a few months. * #TSLA is currently trading inside a bearish descending channel, with momentum still negative. $399.24 is the key short-term pivot level. It acts as immediate resistance, and as long as $TSLA stays below it, bears remain in control. $425.88 is a major resistance (former breakdown level), while $448.85 is a critical breakout level – only above this level can the true bullish reversal be confirmed. Rallies into these zones are sellable until proven otherwise. $367.96 is likely a short-term downside for the next few days. $356.54 is the next major level (50% retracement), which is expected to be hit within 1–2 weeks. * So, the current setup favors selling near $399 with the $356 target. Momentum stays bearish until $399.24 is reclaimed. If $TSLA reclaims $399.24, the bias shifts to short-term bullish. We could expect a move toward $425 and then to $448. However, these levels are still expected to act as resistance, likely fade zones into April–May. #TSLA remains in a sell-the-rally environment. * If you enjoyed this update, please ❤️like and 🔁retweet Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Mar 26, 2026 in this short video🔽
2:56

📺 $TSLA ISN’T DONE FALLING — LOWER PRICE AHEAD #Tesla is in a confirmed longer-term sell signal after breaking below $425.88 about five weeks ago. That breakdown projects a primary downside target of $331.25, expected to be reached within the 2–3-month window (now about halfway through). Despite the bearish trend, $331.25 is seen as a major inflection point to take profits on shorts and go long, with the potential reversal back toward $420+ within a few months. * #TSLA is currently trading inside a bearish descending channel, with momentum still negative. $399.24 is the key short-term pivot level. It acts as immediate resistance, and as long as $TSLA stays below it, bears remain in control. $425.88 is a major resistance (former breakdown level), while $448.85 is a critical breakout level – only above this level can the true bullish reversal be confirmed. Rallies into these zones are sellable until proven otherwise. $367.96 is likely a short-term downside for the next few days. $356.54 is the next major level (50% retracement), which is expected to be hit within 1–2 weeks. * So, the current setup favors selling near $399 with the $356 target. Momentum stays bearish until $399.24 is reclaimed. If $TSLA reclaims $399.24, the bias shifts to short-term bullish. We could expect a move toward $425 and then to $448. However, these levels are still expected to act as resistance, likely fade zones into April–May. #TSLA remains in a sell-the-rally environment. * If you enjoyed this update, please ❤️like and 🔁retweet Watch the full $TSLA Trading Plan for Mar 26, 2026 in this short video🔽

Wicked Stocks

13,116 次观看 • 6 个月前

IF IRAN CROSSES 90%, THE MIDDLE EAST CHANGES FOREVER. Iran has clearly said it will not stop uranium enrichment. To build a nuclear weapon, uranium typically needs to be enriched to around 90%, especially using the U-235 isotope. Iran is already reported to have enriched beyond 60%. If it reaches weapons-grade levels, it could technically become the 10th nuclear-armed state. This isn’t just Iran vs Israel. This is about power balance. The US and Israel have long opposed nuclear expansion in the region. On the other side, Russia and China don’t want unchecked US dominance in the Middle East. Oil routes. Trade corridors. Military bases. Sanctions. Everything is connected. The United States maintains 800+ military bases across 80+ countries. Conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and beyond have reshaped entire regions. Here’s the real question: If Iran reaches nuclear capability, does war escalate… or does everyone suddenly choose negotiation? In geopolitics, there are no permanent friends. Only permanent interests. Watch till the end. The full picture matters. #Iran #Israel #USA #Geopolitics #Nuclear #MiddleEast
2:46

IF IRAN CROSSES 90%, THE MIDDLE EAST CHANGES FOREVER. Iran has clearly said it will not stop uranium enrichment. To build a nuclear weapon, uranium typically needs to be enriched to around 90%, especially using the U-235 isotope. Iran is already reported to have enriched beyond 60%. If it reaches weapons-grade levels, it could technically become the 10th nuclear-armed state. This isn’t just Iran vs Israel. This is about power balance. The US and Israel have long opposed nuclear expansion in the region. On the other side, Russia and China don’t want unchecked US dominance in the Middle East. Oil routes. Trade corridors. Military bases. Sanctions. Everything is connected. The United States maintains 800+ military bases across 80+ countries. Conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and beyond have reshaped entire regions. Here’s the real question: If Iran reaches nuclear capability, does war escalate… or does everyone suddenly choose negotiation? In geopolitics, there are no permanent friends. Only permanent interests. Watch till the end. The full picture matters. #Iran #Israel #USA #Geopolitics #Nuclear #MiddleEast

CryptoWala | ABRAR KHAN

92,462 次观看 • 7 个月前

"Big Short" investor Danny Moses (Danny Moses) sees parallels between 2008 and 2026. We sat down to unpack his highest-conviction trades for the new year, what he expects gold and silver to do next, why he's paying attention to uranium and how a weaker dollar impacts the investment landscape. Danny delivers an absurd amount of insights per minute in this conversation. This is a must-watch for any investor. 0:00 - Intro 0:28 - Gold & silver 4:48 - AI and metals 6:46 - AI circular financing 8:34 - Energy trade 11:10 - Public & Generated Assets 12:20 - Uranium 14:08 - Oil & energy sector 16:11 - Hidden opportunities 18:38 - Market rotation 20:19 - Government debt 23:19 - Weaker US dollar 25:10 - 2008 parallels 27:54 - Bullish environment 29:54 - Lessons of 2008 33:04 - The next Big Short? 35:22 - Easing regulations 37:28 - Danny’s work and media
41:16

"Big Short" investor Danny Moses (Danny Moses) sees parallels between 2008 and 2026. We sat down to unpack his highest-conviction trades for the new year, what he expects gold and silver to do next, why he's paying attention to uranium and how a weaker dollar impacts the investment landscape. Danny delivers an absurd amount of insights per minute in this conversation. This is a must-watch for any investor. 0:00 - Intro 0:28 - Gold & silver 4:48 - AI and metals 6:46 - AI circular financing 8:34 - Energy trade 11:10 - Public & Generated Assets 12:20 - Uranium 14:08 - Oil & energy sector 16:11 - Hidden opportunities 18:38 - Market rotation 20:19 - Government debt 23:19 - Weaker US dollar 25:10 - 2008 parallels 27:54 - Bullish environment 29:54 - Lessons of 2008 33:04 - The next Big Short? 35:22 - Easing regulations 37:28 - Danny’s work and media

Phil Rosen

14,094 次观看 • 8 个月前

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."
4:53

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."

ANI

19,136 次观看 • 6 个月前