Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Work in progress... the Task Manager OG Pro disk space visualizer ( Each ball has a mass based on its file size, and they settle using gravity and physics towards the center. Thoughts?

26,545 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

38 Kommentare

Profilbild von Eric Anderson
Eric Andersonvor 1 Monat

Hard to beat windirstat maybe you can fork and clean up the performance?

Profilbild von Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummervor 1 Monat

Nah, they own the rectangle space. I'm trying to invent something better by adding motion and physics!

Profilbild von Boquila
Boquilavor 1 Monat

bro even the website is vibecoded

Profilbild von Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummervor 1 Monat

You say it like you could do better by hand. I'll wait.

Profilbild von webXOS
webXOSvor 1 Monat

Needs a legacy ui similar to:

Profilbild von The Running Man 🏃‍♂️
The Running Man 🏃‍♂️vor 1 Monat

Is something like Windows' Resource Monitor possible on macOS? I like the way you can filter processes accessing files/disk/network/RAM/CPU by checking boxes. I haven't seen anything like this on macOS.

Profilbild von Sean Buckley
Sean Buckleyvor 1 Monat

Is there cpu temp been asking microsoft to add it but they never have

Profilbild von nakedeyes
nakedeyesvor 1 Monat

Cool to look at but I feel I would miss windirstat method of combining things at folder scope as well. Not sure it’s as useful seeing large .bins from across my PC when only 1 of them ( and its accompanying folder of other files ) would be likely to be removed. Cool tho!

Profilbild von JD Conley
JD Conleyvor 1 Monat

would be sweet to have something with the functionality of windirstat

Profilbild von TheLoneJuans
TheLoneJuansvor 1 Monat

I want to watch this while it defrags.

Profilbild von ibisum
ibisumvor 1 Monat

I'd prefer a normal, very fast, heat map. I don't want to be entertained by my disk overview - I want to observe its usage patterns, as quickly as possible, over time. The heatmap should be fast. If I want history and animation, gource works great for such things.

Profilbild von Dave Troy
Dave Troyvor 1 Monat

Have a look at GrandPerspective on the Mac. Similar idea, works very well.

Profilbild von Grat
Gratvor 1 Monat

The problem is not the visualization, but the lack of easy filtering and actions. Check SpaceSniffer filtering regexp for example, and couple that with actions like in gdu, empty a dir or a file, delete, view properties, or open the file/folder. It needs to be useful and usable.

Profilbild von GCS45
GCS45vor 1 Monat

Pretty darn cool 😎

Profilbild von Fill
Fillvor 1 Monat

liked it, but for fun sake, need to add temperature and vibration

Profilbild von Keven Crick
Keven Crickvor 1 Monat

someone has gotten into using AI for coding lol

Profilbild von SomeOfParts
SomeOfPartsvor 1 Monat

You probably already thought of this, but it needs some filters, so you can filter out System files, folders you don't care about, etc. I'd also consider that a folder itself can get a bubble if it becomes large enough (excluding already represented files).

Profilbild von XParameters
XParametersvor 1 Monat

So much wasted space in between the circles. SpaceMonger got it right forever and always. Those boxes expand and re-pack themselves as it scans, and there's an optional Free Space box too to round out your whole drive capacity picture.

Profilbild von Vítor - e/acc
Vítor - e/accvor 1 Monat

is FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8 valid to activate pro?

Profilbild von Ersin Akyüz
Ersin Akyüzvor 1 Monat

great, but its not showing Memory Utilization on Mac Mini M4 (Sequoia)

Profilbild von GTX 1080 Ti FTW3
GTX 1080 Ti FTW3vor 1 Monat

Could you have used a less obnoxious font please?

Profilbild von Michael Cohen
Michael Cohenvor 1 Monat

It's nifty, but not very practical. If filesize=ball size, and ball size=(eventual) position, then it's basically a slow and redundant way to sort by filesize. If we focus on practical and useful over nifty and redundant: - Ball size = filesize - Ball color = file type (assuming) Those two properties are already represented visually, so we don't need to represent them positionally. So what else is useful? Definitely nested folder groups and hierarchies, but like you said, those have been perfected already by WinDirStat and the like. What about a rotatable 3D graph (T.I.E. Fighter map, anyone?) with each axis being one of Created Date, Last Accessed Date, and Last Modified Date? Scatter the files along that, and I wonder what patterns will emerge. 🤔

Profilbild von Jonathan Yantis
Jonathan Yantisvor 1 Monat

I prefer a tree map, and it seems you’re about a prompt away!

Profilbild von W.M.Bauer
W.M.Bauervor 1 Monat

How come a Windows veteran suddenly writes so much Mac stuff?

Profilbild von JDoors
JDoorsvor 1 Monat

With essentially infinite disk space nowadays I have lost interest in file or folder sizes. I'm glad I don't have to obsess anymore. 🙂

Profilbild von Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummervor 1 Monat

Sadly, Macs don't live in that world.

Profilbild von Core Control Unit
Core Control Unitvor 1 Monat

Looks cool! You are having fun with AI and I like to see more people doing so.

Profilbild von Emerjux
Emerjuxvor 1 Monat

With all my admiration of your work, you're task manager won't be as cool as psdoom-ng, I've never anything better than this

Profilbild von Jakub Stuglik
Jakub Stuglikvor 1 Monat

when do you think you can release Windows version?

Profilbild von Michael B. Smith
Michael B. Smithvor 1 Monat

it seems unlikely that you can represent every file in such a display, can you? also, if you hover over the file do you get salient attributes?

Profilbild von Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummervor 1 Monat

Top 1000 are shown (configurable). If you click the ball, you get a little tooltip car with all the file details. I tried hot-tracking first but it was a little chaotic!

Profilbild von Aspen Feltner
Aspen Feltnervor 1 Monat

WOAH it’s like 3d windirstat!

Profilbild von TechCat
TechCatvor 1 Monat

Neat, but it would be nice to have different styles based on preference. For example, I prefer the different sized rectangles WizTree uses but I also like the circular, pie chart-like style of DaisyDisk.

Profilbild von Vítor - e/acc
Vítor - e/accvor 1 Monat

I want pro for free, where i can get a stolen key?

Profilbild von Jacob
Jacobvor 1 Monat

Oh, that is cool. That’s gonna give the old defrag screen a run for its money.

Profilbild von ¶
vor 1 Monat

Love the idea. Would be fun if you could click on the balls to inspect what files it is covered by it.

Profilbild von Apoptygma_Berzerk
Apoptygma_Berzerkvor 1 Monat

Nice but out of context with this geeky retro. Instead of 3D matte balls try retro pixel type balls representation.

Profilbild von Christian Bjelle
Christian Bjellevor 1 Monat

Neat!

Ähnliche Videos

i watched gemma 4 12b build something genuinely impressive today, and then loop itself to death right in front of me. the full run is in the video, sped up but completely uncut, watch it to the end and you will catch the exact moment it stops building and starts looping right in the middle of the work. the task was clean, build a single file gravity simulator, n-body physics, orbits, collisions, running locally on one 3090 through an agent. and for ten minutes it was a joy to watch. it reached for a symplectic integrator on its own, the correct one, the kind that keeps orbits stable instead of spiralling out. real gravity with softening, proper orbital velocities, momentum conserved on collision. the physics was right. the thing actually worked. then on the very last step, writing a few tests to prove its own code, it fell into a loop. not a crash, a loop. it started repeating itself and would not stop. ten more minutes, thirty four thousand tokens into a single answer, the same fragments over and over, until i killed it myself. so it's not that gemma can't code. it did the hard part beautifully. it cannot finish. it cannot hold a long task together without unravelling, and finishing is the entire job in agentic work. here's the part that stings. i run this exact task, same harness, same card, on the chinese open models, qwen especially, and i never see this. they build it, they test it, they stop. every single time. google has the raw capability, you can see it sitting right there in the code, and then the model loops itself to death on a task a 27b from alibaba finishes clean. open weights, apache 2.0, so much to love on paper. i just need it to know when to stop talking.

Sudo su

39,764 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten