Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

WTH.. did Ox Alpha achieved self-learning, or what ?? I gave it the exact same prompt I used 3 days ago, but the output is completely different. For the same task, it took 330 mins instead of 80 mins and wrote 4,500+ lines of code. how 😬.....?

Adidotdev's profile picture

Adit_Yah ☄️

3,660 subscribers

11,997 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭
0:20

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

Bhavy☄️

318,379 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

I feel Ox Alpha has continual learning and is modifying itself each day coz how else does it keep improving on it's own? i gave it the same prompt i used on the first day and the output is drastically improved, with a more detailed and accurate 3d model of raptor engine
0:28

I feel Ox Alpha has continual learning and is modifying itself each day coz how else does it keep improving on it's own? i gave it the same prompt i used on the first day and the output is drastically improved, with a more detailed and accurate 3d model of raptor engine

Tim Jayas

543,343 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

🚨 Ox Alpha might actually be AGI I gave it and GPT-5.6 Sol (Ultra) the exact same prompt to build a website with cursor-reactive magnetic motion. Ox Alpha delivered faster and, in this test, far more accurately. the motion feels better, the graphics look cleaner, and even the font choices are way ahead of what GPT-5.6 Sol gave me. I’ll drop the exact prompt I used in the comments for anyone who wants to try it.
0:38

🚨 Ox Alpha might actually be AGI I gave it and GPT-5.6 Sol (Ultra) the exact same prompt to build a website with cursor-reactive magnetic motion. Ox Alpha delivered faster and, in this test, far more accurately. the motion feels better, the graphics look cleaner, and even the font choices are way ahead of what GPT-5.6 Sol gave me. I’ll drop the exact prompt I used in the comments for anyone who wants to try it.

m0h

53,425 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Still, something about it seemed off… So I did a quick google search, and within a couple minutes I found this video of what appeared to be the same woman, with the exact same malady, experiencing the exact same miracle, only in a completely different setting.
3:14

Still, something about it seemed off… So I did a quick google search, and within a couple minutes I found this video of what appeared to be the same woman, with the exact same malady, experiencing the exact same miracle, only in a completely different setting.

Matthew Hartke

338,112 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over
0:31

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A sample of caffeine from prompt to launch it took about 30 mins to launch but I wrote an extremely thorough an elaborate prompt. I wanted to QA test if I could crash it. Nope it did QA and solved its own issues for me. My mind was blown.
0:37

A sample of caffeine from prompt to launch it took about 30 mins to launch but I wrote an extremely thorough an elaborate prompt. I wanted to QA test if I could crash it. Nope it did QA and solved its own issues for me. My mind was blown.

stoik.icp

21,586 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I gave ChatGPT a screenshot of a SaaS dashboard and it wrote the code for it. This is the future.
2:51

I gave ChatGPT a screenshot of a SaaS dashboard and it wrote the code for it. This is the future.

Mckay Wrigley

8,207,115 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

I recorded this on my phone to practice and so I can listen while i was on the plane ……. This is exactly how I rapped it on the freestyle same exact poccet , but when u go listen to the freestyle it sound completely different
3:47

I recorded this on my phone to practice and so I can listen while i was on the plane ……. This is exactly how I rapped it on the freestyle same exact poccet , but when u go listen to the freestyle it sound completely different

SuccaFreeDaloc

28,312 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 GPT 5.6 Pro first output on the same prompt we are getting started > frontend/ webdev is not solved or improved yet > but understanding increased a lot > it started to take 20-40 mins again like it used to do before 5.5 pro
0:40

🚨 GPT 5.6 Pro first output on the same prompt we are getting started > frontend/ webdev is not solved or improved yet > but understanding increased a lot > it started to take 20-40 mins again like it used to do before 5.5 pro

Chetaslua

451,007 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It is incredibly sus, how many parts are eerily similar to my own. But, enough of it is completely different to where I can tell you did make it yourself. Although, it is very hard to believe you yourself happened to come up with some of the exact same ideas as me.
1:32

It is incredibly sus, how many parts are eerily similar to my own. But, enough of it is completely different to where I can tell you did make it yourself. Although, it is very hard to believe you yourself happened to come up with some of the exact same ideas as me.

Matthew

536,799 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.
0:42

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.

Flick

322,001 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Figma canvas generation vs MagicPath same prompt. By the time I sent one request to Figma, I had two views and 3 variations of my designs in MagicPath, fully interactive. After 7 mins of waiting for something, I gave up. This is an embarrassing release. Video is 2x speed
3:14

Figma canvas generation vs MagicPath same prompt. By the time I sent one request to Figma, I had two views and 3 variations of my designs in MagicPath, fully interactive. After 7 mins of waiting for something, I gave up. This is an embarrassing release. Video is 2x speed

Pietro Schirano

37,689 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Trump: That's where Martin Luther King gave his great speech, and he had a million people and I had the same exact crowd, maybe a little bit more. I have pictures of Martin Luther King’s crowd, the exact same, everything, but it was 70 years difference. The exact same crowd, but I actually had more people
1:27

Trump: That's where Martin Luther King gave his great speech, and he had a million people and I had the same exact crowd, maybe a little bit more. I have pictures of Martin Luther King’s crowd, the exact same, everything, but it was 70 years difference. The exact same crowd, but I actually had more people

Acyn

464,576 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 New Mystery Model - korrine this model is loves a lot of token output even for smaller task , like same prompt for ballister it made the visualization but you can see it made it a website with explanation without asking
0:54

🚨 New Mystery Model - korrine this model is loves a lot of token output even for smaller task , like same prompt for ballister it made the visualization but you can see it made it a website with explanation without asking

Chetaslua

36,196 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

🚨 Same sales data. Same prompt. ~32% estimated lower cost. I put the exact same analysis through: Claude Opus 4.8 → $0.12 vs. GMI Router → Cost Mode → Gemini 3.7 Flash → ~$0.081 The task wasn't simple: 6 months of sales data across 4 products → trends, product performance, returns, anomalies, priorities + recommendations. GMI estimated ~$0.0387 savings (~32.3%) based on estimated token usage. And here's what caught my attention: I didn't choose Gemini. GMI Cloud 's Router did. For this workload, the routed output still covered the key analysis requirements. Same data. Same task. Different model selection. Lower estimated cost.
1:40

🚨 Same sales data. Same prompt. ~32% estimated lower cost. I put the exact same analysis through: Claude Opus 4.8 → $0.12 vs. GMI Router → Cost Mode → Gemini 3.7 Flash → ~$0.081 The task wasn't simple: 6 months of sales data across 4 products → trends, product performance, returns, anomalies, priorities + recommendations. GMI estimated ~$0.0387 savings (~32.3%) based on estimated token usage. And here's what caught my attention: I didn't choose Gemini. GMI Cloud 's Router did. For this workload, the routed output still covered the key analysis requirements. Same data. Same task. Different model selection. Lower estimated cost.

Altiam Kabir

32,508 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?
0:41

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

48,124 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.
0:28

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.

Bhavy☄️

22,392 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

I ported Open Brush / Tilt Brush to the open web with IWSDK. It took my agents 29 hours and 3 minutes — I wrote 0 lines of code. GPT 5.5 carried the first stretch; Fable 5 handled the harder work at the end. I did it to prove a point 🧵
0:46

I ported Open Brush / Tilt Brush to the open web with IWSDK. It took my agents 29 hours and 3 minutes — I wrote 0 lines of code. GPT 5.5 carried the first stretch; Fable 5 handled the harder work at the end. I did it to prove a point 🧵

Felix Z

19,078 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I gave the same “build me a fully functional Notion-level SaaS workspace” prompt to Marlow, Base44, and Lovable. Base44 → built it, but the result felt more basic, and page-to-page navigation was slower. Lovable → gave me no output on the trial and asked me to add credits. Marlow → built the strongest SaaS of the three, with working interactions, project management, customization, 10 aesthetic themes, and noticeably faster navigation across the generated app. That speed advantage comes from Marlow running the app on your own VM. And it still did all of this on the trial plan. Same prompt. Very different results. See prompt in the comments ↓
1:29

I gave the same “build me a fully functional Notion-level SaaS workspace” prompt to Marlow, Base44, and Lovable. Base44 → built it, but the result felt more basic, and page-to-page navigation was slower. Lovable → gave me no output on the trial and asked me to add credits. Marlow → built the strongest SaaS of the three, with working interactions, project management, customization, 10 aesthetic themes, and noticeably faster navigation across the generated app. That speed advantage comes from Marlow running the app on your own VM. And it still did all of this on the trial plan. Same prompt. Very different results. See prompt in the comments ↓

Jaynit Makwana

64,307 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce