Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
X Square ran a fully autonomous logistics livestream: sorting parcels and flipping the barcode side up for the scanner. - 1,816 parcels/hour (~2 seconds per parcel) - 98% accuracy - ~45% higher throughput than Figure's sub-3 seconds per parcel pace from its multiday livestream in May. It's driven by... show more
72,067 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 14

1,816 per hour is a real throughput number 🦾

1,816 parcels/hour is useful. What made up the failures, and did any require a person to reset the line? That tells operators how much of the hour ran without help.

Would be interesting to see how it handles damaged boxes, weird shapes, and reflective packaging

Every conveyor guy watching this is looking at the table, not the robots.

98 percent at 1,816 an hour is about 36 parcels going the wrong way every hour. the throughput number only means something next to what recovery costs. does a miss get caught downstream or does it just arrive somewhere wrong?

Useful, but not matched: two fixed arms vs a rotating three-humanoid fleet; 1 hour vs 200. Buyers need cost per successful parcel, changeover, exception recovery, floor space and sustained uptime. Near term, arms/grippers/vision may monetize before humanoid bodies.

@aizorr0 A specialized machine isn’t really comparable to a humanoid robot

ついに2足ロボットは作業に向かないのに気付いたか

It’s coming, start becoming interesting now

Fast sorting is nice

피규어보다 훨빠르노

Obviously much better performance by design, than a humanoid offers. One knows without seeing the data. But the process as such is still broken by design. Whether a human, a humanoid or two robotic arms are applied to it doesn't change that.

2 seconds per parcel with recovery logic. That's where sim-to-real transfer actually shows.

The recovery behavior may be more important than the raw speed. Real-world robotics gets valuable when it can handle messy inputs, failed grasps, and jams without constant human intervention.
