Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Yesterday, Noah’s Ark Scans released Dr. Bakhtar’s report confirming that whatever lies beneath the surface of the boat-shaped formation is NOT geological and is a manmade structure. The evidence is overwhelming, and once the samples get back from the lab, it’s time to demand changes in the curriculums being...

502,412 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

32 Comments

Lauren Witzke's profile picture
Lauren Witzke4 days ago

Lots of mad people in my comment section. Sure is a lot of energy and effort being spent seething over a “pile of rocks” lmao

Truesdell 𓏏𓂋𓅲𓋴𓂧𓃭's profile picture
Truesdell 𓏏𓂋𓅲𓋴𓂧𓃭4 days ago

Do you not understand you have to publish papers of findings and have them peer-reviewed? Every time someone claims something is confirmed at the Dundiper sight, you look like amateurs. Children confirming Santa Clause.

Universal's profile picture
Universal4 days ago

Oh, lol. That is a pretty bold and false statement. If Noah's Ark is real, and I am sure it is, that does not cancel evolution in any way. Maybe it cancels out the full path of man's evolution specifically, as Elohim ( plural ) have jumped that evolution, and created a 'short cut'. Unfortunately nobody can understand the Bible correctly today, which has many omissions, to begin with, and many incorrect translations, due to English language limitations and shortcomings. If it was to be translated and understood correctly, both Creation and Evolution would be seen as part of the same Divine plan. It is actually the religionist that will be in shock of their lives, if they manage to find any carbon dated material,,,, because they will find it to be around 13,000 years old. Yes, it will be around 13,000 years old. So, fasten you seat belt. 😊 Maybe I should include these images, just to add a little flavor to my comment, to those who do not understand the nature of the Universe,,,, which is like everybody. Image 1 - Nebula IC 434 Video 1 - Galaxy M 101 Video 2 - Galaxy UGC 10214, in infrared Video 3 - Center of the Nebula NGC 1052 ( Crab ) If anybody wants to see more of these, I can post you plenty. The whole of Universe is like that. All one has to do is pull away the veil. Certainly leaving the religious dogmas behind would be very helpful also.

Lauren Witzke's profile picture
Lauren Witzke4 days ago

Check out our latest press release with Bakhtar’s preliminary report here:

Ian Ferrin's profile picture
Ian Ferrin4 days ago

Your evidence is so not overwhelming. The only thing that is overwhelming is the consensus for the big bang and evolution from mainstream science. Creation 'science' is dogma in a pseudo scientific cloak. You are not even a blip on mainstream science's radar. You've already lost many Christian universities and there's not a chance in hades you'll get Creationism into the public schools. You're delusional.

Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak's profile picture
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak4 days ago

what evidence? You keep saying you "proved it" and "overwhelming" but you are still waiting for the lab results. You are a scam artist.

OldGuyWithQuestions's profile picture
OldGuyWithQuestions4 days ago

This is playing out EXACTLY like the Khafre Project grift, with the huge buildings in a cave under the Pyramids, and mysterious super tech SARS radar scans "proving" it.

Silver's profile picture
Silver4 days ago

“Confirming” and “once samples get back from the lab” in the same post is crazy work. You haven’t confirmed there is a man made structure there. We already know a flood did not happen because civilisations thrived at the supposed time of the flood.

Dahm&Dahmer's profile picture
Dahm&Dahmer4 days ago

You are not stupid like everyone says, you are just a grifting liar who looks like an aging porn star.

Atomixion's profile picture
Atomixion4 days ago

Everyone notice how she keeps unconsciously looking down in shame because she knows she's lying.

Justan Observer's profile picture
Justan Observer4 days ago

Noah was obviously in need of glasses because his carpentry is crap and not remotely symmetrical.

Lens of Logic's profile picture
Lens of Logic4 days ago

The manmade part is what I can't stop thinking about. A boat shape in the ground is one thing. Something built under it is another.

FutureGuy's profile picture
FutureGuy4 days ago

The boat might be real, nothing to do with evolution.

Cbiz's profile picture
Cbiz4 days ago

Lol I was with you until evolution is a lie. It's clearly a fact of existence, maybe we just misunderstand God's role in evolution.

Pitboxer Creations's profile picture
Pitboxer Creations4 days ago

Pretty much everything you said from the start of the video to the end is BS.

Godson Koilpillai's profile picture
Godson Koilpillai4 days ago

Yes science always changes its facts from decades to decades.. but His Words are always true in any day... Science is a "changing" phenomenon.. Our God is an "eternal" phenomenon.. Praise the Lord..

Ben Frank's profile picture
Ben Frank4 days ago

How do we go from “This Might be Noah’s Ark” to “Evolution is a lie” if this whole thing has any meaning at all?

CappinKirkBibleBreakdowns's profile picture
CappinKirkBibleBreakdowns4 days ago

That is a massive leap from what the evidence actually establishes. The October 1 release is a preliminary report interpreting radar anomalies as organized structures. Even Noah’s Ark Scans says its data are “suggestive, not conclusive” and that core drilling and geological verification are still required. So “the radar shows something unusual” does not equal “we found Noah’s Ark,” and neither of those equals “evolution is a lie.” You’re combining four separate claims and treating the first as proof of all the others. Let the physical samples establish what the formation actually is before declaring the case closed.

Will Munny's profile picture
Will Munny4 days ago

Lol

Ray Simpson's profile picture
Ray Simpson4 days ago

This has nothing to do with evolution. Actukally the opposite, if you think there were 15000 "kinds" on the Ark and millions today, you are in favor of super-hyperevolution of new species. You would be teaching evolution (=speciation) but super duper fast.

Ethan 🇺🇸🇹🇼🇯🇵🇰🇷's profile picture
Ethan 🇺🇸🇹🇼🇯🇵🇰🇷4 days ago

Kind of regret donating to your expedition. This should be a scientific expedition and not a cult. Evolution is as real as it gets

𝕻𝖀𝕰𝕰💭𝕾𝕸𝕺𝕲𝕮💭's profile picture
𝕻𝖀𝕰𝕰💭𝕾𝕸𝕺𝕲𝕮💭4 days ago

If ur dumb enough to give away ur money to these scammers then I have a bridge to sell you.

Earl Warhus's profile picture
Earl Warhus4 days ago

Why does it matter when the entire planet was rushing onto an ark of one sort or another during the Great Flood? It sounds like a competition between religions where cooperation would be more fruitful to humanity.

Z's profile picture
Z4 days ago

If you believe this tomfoolery, I have a nice oceanfront property in Arizona for sale.

Mort Toupes's profile picture
Mort Toupes4 days ago

Bullshit

texas ranger72's profile picture
texas ranger724 days ago

You folks need to do more research perhaps? Excellent overview here of possible Noe’s ark site—What We Know on this Earth Formation. via @YouTube

saynoto's profile picture
saynoto4 days ago

not one, but 5 different civilzations not only survived the mythical flood, but were thriving and wrote nothing about it.

dablakh0l's profile picture
dablakh0l4 days ago

No it isn't. That site has been proven to be a totally normal geological formation. Noah's ark never happened. Just like pretty much everything else in the old testament.

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His)'s profile picture
Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His)4 days ago

The claim “once samples get back from the lab, then it’s time to rewrite the curriculum” puts the cart before the horse. Even if the labs returned something genuinely surprising, like the claim of mineralized wood, it would still have to show it was worked by humans…

John Michaelson 🔭's profile picture
John Michaelson 🔭4 days ago

Literally no one will care about your 'evidence' without an independent review. This site has been repeatedly examined in the past by genuine experts who found nothing at all to support this nonsense.

Marcus Fidelicus's profile picture
Marcus Fidelicus4 days ago

What a clown

Rory Tyer's profile picture
Rory Tyer4 days ago

unfortunately the only reliably true thing about this is that you will not learn what you should when this all turns out to be nothing

Related Videos

WORLD-SHAKING RELEASE: Durupınar Formation Is 100% NOT Geological! Defense Scientist Calls Noah’s Ark “Extraordinary” “If it were geological, we would not have seen it at all!” — Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar’s preliminary report CONFIRMS that the Durupınar Formation is NOT geological, and that an “extraordinary” man-made structure lies beneath the surface. All of us at Noah’s Ark Scans always knew Durupınar was the resting place of Noah’s Ark. We knew we had to prove it. So we put it through the ultimate test. We brought the most credentialed rock-mechanics expert we possibly could to the Mountains of Ararat and ran BakhtarRadar across the formation. This is the most compelling evidence of Noah’s Ark to date — the most advanced technology ever used at the site in the history of its discovery. Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar, ARSM, PE, Ph.D., is a mining/rock-mechanics engineer and electromagnetics specialist with 40+ years in geomechanics, tunneling, low-power RF/microwave sensors, and subsurface detection. He managed 25–35+ U.S. Department of Defense projects as program manager and principal investigator for the Air Force, Navy, and Defense Threat Reduction Agency. He has written over 200 papers. His radar, BakhtarRadar, masks all geological features, making rocks, dirt, and anything geological completely invisible. He found an “extraordinary and massive object” beneath the surface, with organized patterns, corridors, chambers, and a structure he believes could be a space shuttle or a ship. Dr. Bakhtar confirms: the Durupınar Formation is not geological. There is some kind of organized man-made structure beneath the surface. It’s all real. The Bible is real. The Ark is real. More to come as we await the core and soil sample results in the lab. Help us cover the cost of the lab results as we continue to make the evidence of Noah’s Ark irrefutable:

Noahs Ark Scans

585,532 views • 7 days ago