Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

You open Figma. Then VS Code. Then a 3D tool. Then an image generator. Then you're gluing it all together at midnight wondering why this takes so long. That was the old way. Omma AI launched on March 24, 2026 built by the team behind Spline, who already have...

10,693 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

SOMEONE FROM THE ANTHROPIC TEAM LEAKED THEIR OBSIDIAN SETUP. 8 MILLION PEOPLE SAW HOW HE ACTUALLY USES CLAUDE the funniest part? all of this information was sitting in claude's documentation from day one. nobody read it one guy did, packed it into a 9-step guide and posted it. and it broke the internet. 4,100 likes, 800 retweets, then china picked it up and 8 million views want to know what's in it? one file. called CLAUDE.md. it holds everything about you: how you think, what you're working on, where you get stuck, even how you want the ai to talk to you. claude reads it first every single session one file changed everything. because now ai doesn't open with "how can i help?" it already knows. it remembers your projects, sees your goals, catches moments where you're contradicting yourself people spent years searching for the perfect prompt. the right temperature. the magic formula. and the answer turned out to be not how you ask ai. but what ai knows about you before you even open your mouth then the guy went deeper. taught claude to work on a schedule. every morning at 7am the ai walks through all notes on its own, finds new stuff, links it, cleans what's stale. no command. no reminder and all of this runs on obsidian. free app. text files on your drive. no cloud, no lock-in. switch models tomorrow and the folder keeps working the most liked comment under the original post: "this is the difference between using ai and building a system. most people won't realize it until they waste hundreds of hours repeating themselves" hundreds of hours. you've already spent some of them full guide in the video. i break down finds like this every day - follow so you don't miss the next one

kai

177,245 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

An AI engineer stopped me at a coffee shop because of what was on my screen. I was running a Polymarket trading system powered by AI. He glanced over once. Then again. Then asked: "What exactly is that?" I told him: • Claude Code • Open-source tools • A few custom workflows • Less than $30/month He pulled up a chair. Then I showed him what the system was doing. Millions of trades analyzed. Thousands of wallets tracked. Every entry. Every exit. Every profitable pattern. One prompt: "Find consistently profitable traders and identify repeatable behaviors." Within minutes, the system returned a shortlist of high-performing wallets worth studying. What used to take days of manual research took minutes. But that was only the beginning. The second workflow monitored live prediction markets. It automatically filtered: • liquidity • pricing inefficiencies • volume spikes • whale activity • momentum shifts Hundreds of markets became a small watchlist. Most opportunities were rejected automatically. Only the strongest setups survived. Then he asked: "How does it know when to enter?" Three independent AI agents. One looks for arbitrage. One tracks probability convergence. One follows high-conviction traders. When multiple agents agree, confidence increases. When they disagree, no trade. Simple. But surprisingly effective. Then came the next question: "What about exits?" The system doesn't just analyze winning traders. It studies how they take profits. Many successful traders close positions long before settlement. So the bot watches for: • profit targets • unusual volume • momentum reversals The goal isn't to predict everything. It's to react faster than manual traders can. He stared at the dashboard for a few seconds and said: "This isn't just market analysis." "It's an intelligence system." And that's the shift most people are missing. AI isn't only helping people work faster. It's compressing workflows that once required entire teams into a laptop and a few prompts. The gap between individuals and institutions is shrinking. Fast. The people learning these tools today are building the edge everyone else will be chasing tomorrow. Comment "Claude" if you want the framework.

Paul Sims

13,738 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Ricardo

2,978,776 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce