Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Your coding agent is a surgeon doing the paperwork. Opus 5.5 is brilliant. And you're paying it to decide which file to open. Which test to run. Whether to retry. That's not surgery. That's admin. Give the admin to Jev. Keep the surgeon in surgery. Same results. A third... show more

CyrilXBT

197,156 subscribers

29,553 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 13

Фото профиля Vipul Kumar Kewat

Vipul Kumar Kewat3 дней назад

This is a smart way to think about model routing.

Фото профиля Michael Kaiser

Michael Kaiser3 дней назад

Opus 5.5 is still the best for me

Фото профиля cortexch

cortexch3 дней назад

the context section is the gold here and has nothing to do with routing. a timestamp at the top of the prompt quietly kills ur cache on every single call

Фото профиля Karter U

Karter U2 дней назад

Who decides easy vs hard? That call is the whole game. What rules does Jev use?

Фото профиля prism

prism2 дней назад

Same logic as the manual tax. Pay cheap where it's dumb, pay smart where it counts.

Фото профиля Asmir

Asmir3 дней назад

problem is if haiku opens the wrong file it won't tell you, and opus just reasons confidently over the wrong context

Фото профиля 阿星返85｜Gate

阿星返85｜Gate2 дней назад

把手术刀留给专家，杂事交给AI处理才对

Фото профиля ೃ⁀➷ soph ♡

ೃ⁀➷ soph ♡2 дней назад

The 80% claim assumes "easy vs hard" is decidable before the work starts. Most bugs look easy until the fix breaks two other tests. Who eats the cost when Jev misroutes?

Фото профиля swapcherry

swapcherry2 дней назад

who is jev

Фото профиля Alessandro Moretti

Alessandro Moretti3 дней назад

Number 27 is the one I see most. Two agents that share the full context pay twice for the same reading. A short summary is usually enough.

Фото профиля Genius💡💹🧲 🤖

Genius💡💹🧲 🤖2 дней назад

Paying Opus rates to pick which file to open is pure waste fr

Фото профиля Lea Thompson

Lea Thompson3 дней назад

Pay frontier prices for an overqualified secretary, checks out. My CoinStats is a Jackson Pollock of losses too but at least the burns are self-inflicted. Stop paying surgeons to file paperwork.

Фото профиля 北野高返85｜Gate

北野高返85｜Gate2 дней назад

把苦力活交给机器，把脑子留给手术室

Похожие видео

Do the math on 1,000 coding tasks a month. Opus 5.5 doing everything: $6,420 Jev + Opus 5.5: $2,000 That's $4,420 a month back. $53,040 a year. Same tasks. Same model writing the code. The only difference is who makes the small decisions. Full build below. Bookmark this.

Do the math on 1,000 coding tasks a month. Opus 5.5 doing everything: $6,420 Jev + Opus 5.5: $2,000 That's $4,420 a month back. $53,040 a year. Same tasks. Same model writing the code. The only difference is who makes the small decisions. Full build below. Bookmark this.

CyrilXBT

31,446 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Jev + Opus 5.5 is the most underrated setup in AI right now, and i don't get why nobody's talking about it. I stopped letting Opus make every small decision in my agents. Jev makes them now. My Opus bill dropped ~500% on the same tasks, same results. Here's what Jev handles: - which files and notes to load before Opus sees anything - which effort level each task actually needs - what to do when a tool fails - which tests to run, and when to stop Opus only gets called for the hard reasoning. Every decision is a typed result the host checks before it runs. The exact prompt to set this up in your workflow is below.

Jev + Opus 5.5 is the most underrated setup in AI right now, and i don't get why nobody's talking about it. I stopped letting Opus make every small decision in my agents. Jev makes them now. My Opus bill dropped ~500% on the same tasks, same results. Here's what Jev handles: - which files and notes to load before Opus sees anything - which effort level each task actually needs - what to do when a tool fails - which tests to run, and when to stop Opus only gets called for the hard reasoning. Every decision is a typed result the host checks before it runs. The exact prompt to set this up in your workflow is below.

Anatoli Kopadze

76,655 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Nobody talks about where coding agent money actually goes. It's not the code. Writing code is a small part of the bill. The rest is the agent: Reading files it didn't need. Deliberating over tiny choices. Retrying things that were never going to work. Fix the waste, not the model. That's the whole idea behind this architecture 👇

Nobody talks about where coding agent money actually goes. It's not the code. Writing code is a small part of the bill. The rest is the agent: Reading files it didn't need. Deliberating over tiny choices. Retrying things that were never going to work. Fix the waste, not the model. That's the whole idea behind this architecture 👇

CyrilXBT

10,940 просмотров • 3 дней назад

American surgeon records herself doing a “peer to peer” call with UnitedHealthcare trying to get a patients surgery approved - UnitedHealthcare refuses to give any of their doctors names who makes decisions - The doctor doesn’t specialize in surgery that’s being requested - She asks for the determination paperwork of how UnitedHealthcare determined the patient shouldn’t get the surgery, UnitedHealthcare won’t provide that information - UnitedHealthcare tells the surgeon to do an “internal appeal” but won’t provide any details on their determination So to recap: UnitedHealthcare denies patients, their surgeon calls and can’t get a name, a specialty, or any details whatsoever regarding the denial This is the state of American Healthcare

American surgeon records herself doing a “peer to peer” call with UnitedHealthcare trying to get a patients surgery approved - UnitedHealthcare refuses to give any of their doctors names who makes decisions - The doctor doesn’t specialize in surgery that’s being requested - She asks for the determination paperwork of how UnitedHealthcare determined the patient shouldn’t get the surgery, UnitedHealthcare won’t provide that information - UnitedHealthcare tells the surgeon to do an “internal appeal” but won’t provide any details on their determination So to recap: UnitedHealthcare denies patients, their surgeon calls and can’t get a name, a specialty, or any details whatsoever regarding the denial This is the state of American Healthcare

Wall Street Apes

4,417,727 просмотров • 1 год назад

this is the full SEO course, run on Opus 5.5 7 modules. 7 prompts. most people ask AI to "do SEO" and get generic advice back the model can't see Google, so you have to feed it your data every prompt is in the thread below which module do you need first?

this is the full SEO course, run on Opus 5.5 7 modules. 7 prompts. most people ask AI to "do SEO" and get generic advice back the model can't see Google, so you have to feed it your data every prompt is in the thread below which module do you need first?

CyrilXBT

13,819 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Ok this is actually insane. Everyone building agents right now is doing the same expensive mistake. They let the model decide LITERALLY everything. Every check. Every gate. Every "should this proceed." All routed through the same $50/M model that's supposed to be doing the hard thinking. That's not intelligence. That's just burning money to ask yes or no questions. Here's what Jev Engineering actually does: request → structured state → Jev router → cheapest capable model → worker → approval check → execution gate → tool The decision layer doesn't write a single word. It routes. Scores. Blocks. Approves. That's it. The expensive model only gets touched when the task LITERALLY requires reasoning. Everything else gets handled by something that costs almost nothing and responds in milliseconds. 193x faster. 444x cheaper. Not projected. Measured. Most people are going to keep paying frontier prices to ask their agent "yes or no" for another year before they figure this out. Full breakdown below, this is the unlock nobody's talking about yet. Follow CyrilXBT, I'm not gatekeeping this one.

Ok this is actually insane. Everyone building agents right now is doing the same expensive mistake. They let the model decide LITERALLY everything. Every check. Every gate. Every "should this proceed." All routed through the same $50/M model that's supposed to be doing the hard thinking. That's not intelligence. That's just burning money to ask yes or no questions. Here's what Jev Engineering actually does: request → structured state → Jev router → cheapest capable model → worker → approval check → execution gate → tool The decision layer doesn't write a single word. It routes. Scores. Blocks. Approves. That's it. The expensive model only gets touched when the task LITERALLY requires reasoning. Everything else gets handled by something that costs almost nothing and responds in milliseconds. 193x faster. 444x cheaper. Not projected. Measured. Most people are going to keep paying frontier prices to ask their agent "yes or no" for another year before they figure this out. Full breakdown below, this is the unlock nobody's talking about yet. Follow CyrilXBT, I'm not gatekeeping this one.

CyrilXBT

23,071 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Jev + Opus 5.5, side by side. same agent. same task. same 60 decisions. Opus-only: $2.24 - 3m 37s Jev + Opus: $0.43 - 1m 15s the difference is who makes the small calls: which tool runs next - Jev is this output good enough - Jev is the goal met - Jev rewrite the refund handler - Opus 57 of 60 decisions never touched Opus. what you're watching: left routes every decision through Opus 5.5. right asks Jev first, Opus only fires when the task needs real reasoning. per decision: $0.032 -> $0.00025. watch the cost counters, not the output. the output is identical. full setup in the post below ↓

Jev + Opus 5.5, side by side. same agent. same task. same 60 decisions. Opus-only: $2.24 - 3m 37s Jev + Opus: $0.43 - 1m 15s the difference is who makes the small calls: which tool runs next - Jev is this output good enough - Jev is the goal met - Jev rewrite the refund handler - Opus 57 of 60 decisions never touched Opus. what you're watching: left routes every decision through Opus 5.5. right asks Jev first, Opus only fires when the task needs real reasoning. per decision: $0.032 -> $0.00025. watch the cost counters, not the output. the output is identical. full setup in the post below ↓

Mahax

19,565 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Jev + Claude Opus 5.5... i can't understand why everyone isn't wiring this up yet the forks alone drop from about $110 a day to $4 once jev takes them over. right now it's the best way i know to run opus what jev handles: -> scores which project notes matter before the context even loads -> hands the easy steps to a faster worker -> picks a recovery path when a tool fails, so nothing retries blind -> runs the focused checks before the full test suite opus does the hard reasoning. jev chooses from options the harness already prepared and validated that's jev engineering in one line: the expensive model thinks, the cheap one decides $106 a day back on the same work is a number your manager remembers read the paper, then the full jev guide below

Jev + Claude Opus 5.5... i can't understand why everyone isn't wiring this up yet the forks alone drop from about $110 a day to $4 once jev takes them over. right now it's the best way i know to run opus what jev handles: -> scores which project notes matter before the context even loads -> hands the easy steps to a faster worker -> picks a recovery path when a tool fails, so nothing retries blind -> runs the focused checks before the full test suite opus does the hard reasoning. jev chooses from options the harness already prepared and validated that's jev engineering in one line: the expensive model thinks, the cheap one decides $106 a day back on the same work is a number your manager remembers read the paper, then the full jev guide below

Annatar.md

130,899 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Patrick Mahomes underwent surgery tonight to repair his ACL. The timing and the surgeon who performed the surgery essentially confirms he also tore his LCL, which makes his recovery more difficult.

Patrick Mahomes underwent surgery tonight to repair his ACL. The timing and the surgeon who performed the surgery essentially confirms he also tore his LCL, which makes his recovery more difficult.

David J. Chao - ProFootballDoc

1,796,063 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Jev + Claude Opus 5.5 is a f*cking goldmine... i can't understand why everyone isn't wiring this up yet the forks alone drop from about $110 a day to $4 once Jev takes them over. right now it's the best way i know to run Opus where Jev steps in: -> ranks which project notes matter before the context loads -> passes the easy steps to a faster worker -> chooses a recovery path when a tool fails, so nothing retries blind -> runs the targeted checks before the full test suite Opus does the hard reasoning. Jev chooses between options the harness already built and checked every choice comes back with a probability, so the harness can set a confidence floor and push anything below it back up to Opus Jev engineering fits in one line: the expensive model reasons, the cheap one decides $106 a day saved on the same work ends up in your performance review start with the paper, then the full Jev guide below

Jev + Claude Opus 5.5 is a f*cking goldmine... i can't understand why everyone isn't wiring this up yet the forks alone drop from about $110 a day to $4 once Jev takes them over. right now it's the best way i know to run Opus where Jev steps in: -> ranks which project notes matter before the context loads -> passes the easy steps to a faster worker -> chooses a recovery path when a tool fails, so nothing retries blind -> runs the targeted checks before the full test suite Opus does the hard reasoning. Jev chooses between options the harness already built and checked every choice comes back with a probability, so the harness can set a confidence floor and push anything below it back up to Opus Jev engineering fits in one line: the expensive model reasons, the cheap one decides $106 a day saved on the same work ends up in your performance review start with the paper, then the full Jev guide below

Mr. Buzzoni

19,994 просмотров • 7 дней назад

A surgeon calls UnitedHealthcare to SAVE her patient’s surgery. But they won’t give her the doctor’s name, their specialty, or EVEN the criteria used to DENY care. They deny the surgery, then tell her to appeal — WITHOUT explaining the denial. This is American healthcare.

A surgeon calls UnitedHealthcare to SAVE her patient’s surgery. But they won’t give her the doctor’s name, their specialty, or EVEN the criteria used to DENY care. They deny the surgery, then tell her to appeal — WITHOUT explaining the denial. This is American healthcare.

MatrixMysteries

397,752 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A humanoid robot doing gallbladder surgery sounds fake until you watch the instruments move. This ARCLab / UC San Diego demo shows teleoperated humanoids working through a cholecystectomy benchmark: • tissue handling • anatomical clearance • laparoscopic tool control • surgeon guided motion Important detail: this is not autonomous surgery. The human surgeon is still in control. But the body holding the tools is starting to change. Would you let a teleoperated humanoid perform surgery on you? #RoboticSurgery #HumanoidRobots #MedicalRobotics #Teleoperation #Surgery

A humanoid robot doing gallbladder surgery sounds fake until you watch the instruments move. This ARCLab / UC San Diego demo shows teleoperated humanoids working through a cholecystectomy benchmark: • tissue handling • anatomical clearance • laparoscopic tool control • surgeon guided motion Important detail: this is not autonomous surgery. The human surgeon is still in control. But the body holding the tools is starting to change. Would you let a teleoperated humanoid perform surgery on you? #RoboticSurgery #HumanoidRobots #MedicalRobotics #Teleoperation #Surgery

TechniaHQ | humanoid robots

28,855 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

stop picking one model, a spider merged OPUS 5.5 + SONNET 5.5 + JEV + OPENAI DOTS into one business system one command splits a business into 6 jobs: plan, code, decide, run 24/7, review and ship every job has 4 candidates. the spider scans them one by one, marks the highest score as best, locks it in and swings to the next job the plan goes to Opus 5.5 at 0.94. Jev scores 0.52 on the same job on decisions it flips. Jev wins at 0.97 and Opus 5.5 gets 0.74, so the model that lost the plan is the one making the calls the code goes to Claude Code, and the job called "who never sleeps" goes to OpenAI Dots Opus 5.5 comes back a second time to check the work, and Sonnet 5.5 gets it out at the end 6 of 6 modules are locked and the system goes online run the same test on your own stack before you pay one model to do all six jobs ↓

stop picking one model, a spider merged OPUS 5.5 + SONNET 5.5 + JEV + OPENAI DOTS into one business system one command splits a business into 6 jobs: plan, code, decide, run 24/7, review and ship every job has 4 candidates. the spider scans them one by one, marks the highest score as best, locks it in and swings to the next job the plan goes to Opus 5.5 at 0.94. Jev scores 0.52 on the same job on decisions it flips. Jev wins at 0.97 and Opus 5.5 gets 0.74, so the model that lost the plan is the one making the calls the code goes to Claude Code, and the job called "who never sleeps" goes to OpenAI Dots Opus 5.5 comes back a second time to check the work, and Sonnet 5.5 gets it out at the end 6 of 6 modules are locked and the system goes online run the same test on your own stack before you pay one model to do all six jobs ↓

Noisy

11,722 просмотров • 9 дней назад

i asked opus 5.5 to read every note i wrote this year and tell me what i keep avoiding it took [real time] it said: "[paste its actual answer]" it was right. that's not a notes app anymore. full course on how to build it below

i asked opus 5.5 to read every note i wrote this year and tell me what i keep avoiding it took [real time] it said: "[paste its actual answer]" it was right. that's not a notes app anymore. full course on how to build it below

CyrilXBT

14,327 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Tiago Forte wrote a whole book on building a second brain. The hardest part was never the method. It was finding the time to sort, link and review your notes every week. Opus 5.5 does that part now. Every morning. Every Sunday. Automatically. The method was right. It just needed a brain to run it. Full course below 👇

Tiago Forte wrote a whole book on building a second brain. The hardest part was never the method. It was finding the time to sort, link and review your notes every week. Opus 5.5 does that part now. Every morning. Every Sunday. Automatically. The method was right. It just needed a brain to run it. Full course below 👇

CyrilXBT

19,678 просмотров • 10 дней назад

When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.

When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

45,786 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

$Holy crap, who the hell did this?!! Someone open-sourced a Jev-powered second brain for AI agents and lets you plug it straight into your own agent. GitHub's already at 925 stars, repo's called Hermes-Jev-Skills. You just run one install command, and Jev takes over every tiny decision your agent burns premium tokens on. Which model answers, which skill to load, which memories matter, what survives when context gets cut. Give it your computer or browser and it'll pick the next click, but only from actions you already marked safe. It'll sort your inbox into lanes, strip hidden prompt injections out of search results, and triage every message in ~0.4 seconds. Claude Code and Codex support - they threw that in too. No dependencies, no patching Hermes core, and your API key never touches the agent Link's right here: The catch? Jev itself is a paid cloud API. The skills run on your machine; the decisions don't. But hey, a decision costs a fraction of a cent, everything fails open if Jev goes down, and your expensive model finally gets to do only the thinking. Who needs a damn frontier model picking which file to open!$

Holy crap, who the hell did this?!! Someone open-sourced a Jev-powered second brain for AI agents and lets you plug it straight into your own agent. GitHub's already at 925 stars, repo's called Hermes-Jev-Skills. You just run one install command, and Jev takes over every tiny decision your agent burns premium tokens on. Which model answers, which skill to load, which memories matter, what survives when context gets cut. Give it your computer or browser and it'll pick the next click, but only from actions you already marked safe. It'll sort your inbox into lanes, strip hidden prompt injections out of search results, and triage every message in ~0.4 seconds. Claude Code and Codex support - they threw that in too. No dependencies, no patching Hermes core, and your API key never touches the agent Link's right here: The catch? Jev itself is a paid cloud API. The skills run on your machine; the decisions don't. But hey, a decision costs a fraction of a cent, everything fails open if Jev goes down, and your expensive model finally gets to do only the thinking. Who needs a damn frontier model picking which file to open!

Archive

17,492 просмотров • 14 дней назад

I asked Sonnet 5.5 to create a overcooked clone i could play in the broswer. the results shocked me... It is delivering triple aaa level polish at 20x cheaper than opus 5.5 if you put it in x-high it will RUN. this model will be a perfect worker agent for opus 5.5 or the upcoming fable 5.5 to orchestrate. Anthropic is MOGGGING rn.

I asked Sonnet 5.5 to create a overcooked clone i could play in the broswer. the results shocked me... It is delivering triple aaa level polish at 20x cheaper than opus 5.5 if you put it in x-high it will RUN. this model will be a perfect worker agent for opus 5.5 or the upcoming fable 5.5 to orchestrate. Anthropic is MOGGGING rn.

Max Blade

82,795 просмотров • 16 дней назад