Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ما يجري بين #السعودية والإمارات ليس خلافاً استراتيجياً بل تبايناً عابراً في إدارة ملفات معقّدة. #الإمارات حيثما تدخل تجلب معها الاستثمار، الإعمار، والمساعدات الإنسانية، فيما تبقى السعودية حاسمة بأن اليمن خط أحمر وأمنه جزء من أمنها القومي. الحديث عن شرخ بين الدولتين تروّجه أطراف تعيش على الفوضى. 📅 13...

bilarakib's profile picture

Maria Maalouf

188,424 subscribers

209,877 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика#السعودية#الإمارات
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

We work smarter, not harder. It is simple, really. His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed made it clear that leadership in a complex region requires discipline, respect, and strategic clarity. The UAE understands alliances. It respects the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as a central pillar of regional stability. Our language reflects that respect. Our posture reinforces unity, not friction. We also understand facts on the ground. Forces that stood from day one, carried the burden, and earned the trust of the coalition are not labels to be distorted for political convenience. They are partners who defended legitimacy and stability when it mattered most. And through it all, the UAE remains what it has always been. A reliable neighbor. A committed partner. A state that does not shift with noise or pressure, but stays anchored to principles, coordination, and long term stability in Yemen and the region. That is not rhetoric. That is strategy.
0:35

We work smarter, not harder. It is simple, really. His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed made it clear that leadership in a complex region requires discipline, respect, and strategic clarity. The UAE understands alliances. It respects the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as a central pillar of regional stability. Our language reflects that respect. Our posture reinforces unity, not friction. We also understand facts on the ground. Forces that stood from day one, carried the burden, and earned the trust of the coalition are not labels to be distorted for political convenience. They are partners who defended legitimacy and stability when it mattered most. And through it all, the UAE remains what it has always been. A reliable neighbor. A committed partner. A state that does not shift with noise or pressure, but stays anchored to principles, coordination, and long term stability in Yemen and the region. That is not rhetoric. That is strategy.

Rauda Altenaiji

58,856 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has authorized a FULL military response if Iran attacks again. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman spoke with President Trump, who offered full support for their response. CNN: “I want to go back to that breaking news just in to CNN about Saudi Arabia. It says that it is prepared to respond if Iran continues its retaliatory attack.” “CNN international diplomatic editor Nic Robertson joins us now. What have you learned Nic?” NIC ROBERTSON: “Yeah, this is a really new and big step by the crown prince here to authorize the possibility of Saudi response if Iran attacks Saudi Arabia again.” “He called their attacks yesterday, and in the early hours of today, cowardly, he said that these attacks by Iran were cowardly because Iran knew that Saudi airspace was not being used to attack Iran. And this has incensed him.” “There have been attacks around the capital here that have been intercepted. There was an attack near a military airfield in the north of the country. There have been attacks further east much closer to the Persian Gulf, much closer to Iran.” “They’ve been repelled so far. But the crown prince has said that because of Iran’s actions, he is putting the country, Saudi Arabia’s security first. The safety of its territory, the safety of its citizens, the safety of its residents, he’s putting those things first.” “And for that reason, he says, he is authorizing the right and the military here to respond if they are attacked by Iran.” “And also, we heard from the foreign ministry here on their Twitter feed last night that the crown prince had a telephone conversation with President Trump.” “And in that conversation, the crown prince had full support from President Trump…for how they should respond.”
1:49

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has authorized a FULL military response if Iran attacks again. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman spoke with President Trump, who offered full support for their response. CNN: “I want to go back to that breaking news just in to CNN about Saudi Arabia. It says that it is prepared to respond if Iran continues its retaliatory attack.” “CNN international diplomatic editor Nic Robertson joins us now. What have you learned Nic?” NIC ROBERTSON: “Yeah, this is a really new and big step by the crown prince here to authorize the possibility of Saudi response if Iran attacks Saudi Arabia again.” “He called their attacks yesterday, and in the early hours of today, cowardly, he said that these attacks by Iran were cowardly because Iran knew that Saudi airspace was not being used to attack Iran. And this has incensed him.” “There have been attacks around the capital here that have been intercepted. There was an attack near a military airfield in the north of the country. There have been attacks further east much closer to the Persian Gulf, much closer to Iran.” “They’ve been repelled so far. But the crown prince has said that because of Iran’s actions, he is putting the country, Saudi Arabia’s security first. The safety of its territory, the safety of its citizens, the safety of its residents, he’s putting those things first.” “And for that reason, he says, he is authorizing the right and the military here to respond if they are attacked by Iran.” “And also, we heard from the foreign ministry here on their Twitter feed last night that the crown prince had a telephone conversation with President Trump.” “And in that conversation, the crown prince had full support from President Trump…for how they should respond.”

Overton

179,842 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 Tucker Carlson Sat For A 2.5 Hour Interview In Saudi Arabia The Same Day Saudi Arabia وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 Condemned US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee For Comments Made During His Interview With Tucker Carlson, Suggesting Saudi Coordination With Tucker To Undermine US-Middle East Policy 🚨 Iranian State Media And Saudi Arabia Promote Tucker Carlson’s Anti Israel and Anti-American Interview In Saudi Arabia On February 21, the same day Saudi Arabia issued a statement condemning US Ambassador to Israel Ambassador Mike Huckabee Mike Huckabee’s comments during his interview with Tucker Carlson, Tucker sat for a 2.5 hour interview in Arabic in Saudi Arabia with the program “Al-Liwan” on Saudi Arabia’s Rotana Khalejia network. The interview was then promoted by Iranian state media outlet Borna News. Source: During the interview, Carlson said the United States and many Western countries are governed by “self-interested and unwise” individuals “who create artificial conflicts between nations to conceal their own performance”. Tucker trashed President Trump in Saudi Arabia as “self interested and unwise”, and then went on to bash Israel during the interview in addition to attacking possible US strikes on Iran. Tucker then used his interview to attack US media and said foreign media is more honest than US media. Throughout the interview, Tucker accused US officials of “prioritizing Israel’s interests over those of American voters” and he described Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו as “evil and destructive,” calling him a threat to the world. Tucker ended the interview by saying American leaders and President Trump have pledged greater loyalty to Israel than to the US and he said they have betrayed the United States. It’s clear Tucker is trying to prevent Saudi Arabia from joining the Abraham Accords and he’s going out of his way to undermine US Middle East policy. Tucker is also doing everything in his power to interfere with and undermine US strikes on Iran against the Ayatollah. The fact that Iranian state media is actively promoting Tucker’s interview in Saudi Arabia this week in a positive light is very concerning, as it suggests Tucker’s presence in the Middle East is part of a coordinated Islamic media campaign to sabotage President Trump’s Middle Eastern policy agenda. Tucker continues to violate the Logan Act with zero consequences. Here is the full 2.5 hour interview in Arabic. What are the odds that Tucker was in Saudi Arabia filming Islamic propaganda the same day the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a statement condemning the US Ambassador for Israel over comments made during his interview with Tucker? 🧐 Could it be any more obvious that Tucker Carlson is working to destabilize the Middle East? Did Tucker coordinate the messaging with Saudi Arabia and Iran to stage an international incident and create drama for the US government at a time when the Trump administration is sending US military assets towards Iran? Pete Hegseth It’s unbelievable that the DOJ Pam Bondi is allowing Tucker to get away with this unregistered foreign Islamic lobbying at the expense of US National Security. Watch the full interview below. 👇🏻
2:23:41

EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 Tucker Carlson Sat For A 2.5 Hour Interview In Saudi Arabia The Same Day Saudi Arabia وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 Condemned US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee For Comments Made During His Interview With Tucker Carlson, Suggesting Saudi Coordination With Tucker To Undermine US-Middle East Policy 🚨 Iranian State Media And Saudi Arabia Promote Tucker Carlson’s Anti Israel and Anti-American Interview In Saudi Arabia On February 21, the same day Saudi Arabia issued a statement condemning US Ambassador to Israel Ambassador Mike Huckabee Mike Huckabee’s comments during his interview with Tucker Carlson, Tucker sat for a 2.5 hour interview in Arabic in Saudi Arabia with the program “Al-Liwan” on Saudi Arabia’s Rotana Khalejia network. The interview was then promoted by Iranian state media outlet Borna News. Source: During the interview, Carlson said the United States and many Western countries are governed by “self-interested and unwise” individuals “who create artificial conflicts between nations to conceal their own performance”. Tucker trashed President Trump in Saudi Arabia as “self interested and unwise”, and then went on to bash Israel during the interview in addition to attacking possible US strikes on Iran. Tucker then used his interview to attack US media and said foreign media is more honest than US media. Throughout the interview, Tucker accused US officials of “prioritizing Israel’s interests over those of American voters” and he described Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו as “evil and destructive,” calling him a threat to the world. Tucker ended the interview by saying American leaders and President Trump have pledged greater loyalty to Israel than to the US and he said they have betrayed the United States. It’s clear Tucker is trying to prevent Saudi Arabia from joining the Abraham Accords and he’s going out of his way to undermine US Middle East policy. Tucker is also doing everything in his power to interfere with and undermine US strikes on Iran against the Ayatollah. The fact that Iranian state media is actively promoting Tucker’s interview in Saudi Arabia this week in a positive light is very concerning, as it suggests Tucker’s presence in the Middle East is part of a coordinated Islamic media campaign to sabotage President Trump’s Middle Eastern policy agenda. Tucker continues to violate the Logan Act with zero consequences. Here is the full 2.5 hour interview in Arabic. What are the odds that Tucker was in Saudi Arabia filming Islamic propaganda the same day the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a statement condemning the US Ambassador for Israel over comments made during his interview with Tucker? 🧐 Could it be any more obvious that Tucker Carlson is working to destabilize the Middle East? Did Tucker coordinate the messaging with Saudi Arabia and Iran to stage an international incident and create drama for the US government at a time when the Trump administration is sending US military assets towards Iran? Pete Hegseth It’s unbelievable that the DOJ Pam Bondi is allowing Tucker to get away with this unregistered foreign Islamic lobbying at the expense of US National Security. Watch the full interview below. 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

773,517 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Why Trump's 21-point peace plan has potential? U.S. President Trump's 21-point peace plan in Gaza is more of a comprehensive vision for the future of Israel-Palestinian and Israel-Arab relations than it is a ceasefire deal. ⏬ Downside: 👉 The proposed plan is essentially a compilation of the former ceasefire proposals, with a long-term vision for deradiclization and development. 👉 The plan is full of vague articles that beg deeper discussions on implementation and limitations. 👉 Very little is said about guarantees for Israel's security. 👉 The involvement and responsibility of Arab countries are still minimal. 📈 Potential: ☀️ Still, the plan has great potential to work because it differs from all the previous ceasefire proposals in one key issue: 🇸🇦🇮🇱 This is the first time a deal about Gaza is framed for negotiations between Israel and the Arab-Islamic bloc without making it conditional on Hamas ' approval. This will enable the voices of non-Hamas Gazans to be represented accurately for the first time. 📺 Watch my interview with @laura_i24 of i24NEWS English on this and the expected role of Arab countries, especially Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, in making this plan work: غزة حماس خطة ترامب مصر السعودية الإمارات قطر إسرائيل
4:05

Why Trump's 21-point peace plan has potential? U.S. President Trump's 21-point peace plan in Gaza is more of a comprehensive vision for the future of Israel-Palestinian and Israel-Arab relations than it is a ceasefire deal. ⏬ Downside: 👉 The proposed plan is essentially a compilation of the former ceasefire proposals, with a long-term vision for deradiclization and development. 👉 The plan is full of vague articles that beg deeper discussions on implementation and limitations. 👉 Very little is said about guarantees for Israel's security. 👉 The involvement and responsibility of Arab countries are still minimal. 📈 Potential: ☀️ Still, the plan has great potential to work because it differs from all the previous ceasefire proposals in one key issue: 🇸🇦🇮🇱 This is the first time a deal about Gaza is framed for negotiations between Israel and the Arab-Islamic bloc without making it conditional on Hamas ' approval. This will enable the voices of non-Hamas Gazans to be represented accurately for the first time. 📺 Watch my interview with @laura_i24 of i24NEWS English on this and the expected role of Arab countries, especially Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, in making this plan work: غزة حماس خطة ترامب مصر السعودية الإمارات قطر إسرائيل

Dalia Ziada - داليا زيادة

24,126 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

SUPER BIG! PAKISTAN CHECKMATED IN 105 MINUTES🔥 "Letter of intent was signed b/w Bharat & UAE for STRATEGIC DEFENCE PARTNERSHIP"- Vikram Misri, Frgn Sec What's Strategic Defence Partnership? 👉Deeper Military Cooperation: Joint exercises, intelligence sharing & co-production of defense tech. 👉Tech & Capability Building: Focus on advanced tech transfers, incl AI, space (via a separate LOI between IN-SPACe and UAE Space Agency), and nuclear energy (exploring small modular reactors). 👉Broader Strategic Ties: It's part of a package aiming to double bilateral trade to $200 billion by 2032, with deals on LNG supply, data centers, and investments in Bharat's Infra. PM .Narendra Modi Ji and MBZ emphasized on counter-terr0ri$m & AI collaboration during their talks. 🔥WHY THIS IS BIG? 👉Bharat's Quiet Counter-Move in a Fracturing Gulf. Bharat-UAE LOI isn't coincidental—it's a masterstroke of strategic hedging by PM Modi Ji, without the noise. It hurts the Saudi-Pak Love Affair & boosts Bharat. How- 👉UAE's Pivot Away from Saudi: Tensions between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are rising (e.g., over Yemen, OPEC quotas, and UAE's Israel ties). UAE sees Saudi's Pak-Turkey tilt as sidelining it, so it's doubling down on Bharat for SECURITY DIVERSIFICATION. This LOI signals UAE won't be isolated—Bharat provides a non-Western anchor, countering any Saudi-Pak "nuclear umbrella" narrative. 👉Countering Pak-China Influence: Pakistan's role in Saudi gives it leverage (e.g., via CPEC extensions to Gulf), but Bgarat-UAE ties disrupt that. UAE's interest in Bharatiya arms (like Akash) directly challenges Pakistani exports (e.g., JF-17 to Saudi). It also bolsters Bharat's I2U2 (India-Israel-UAE-US) grouping, indirectly countering China's Belt and Road in the region. 👉Regional Power Shift: This creates parallel power centers—Saudi-Pak-Turkey vs. Bharat-UAE (with Israel vibes). 👉Bharat gains energy security (UAE is a top oil supplier) and a counter-terr0r foothold—key amid Bhikharistan-backed extremism. For UAE, it's hedging against Saudi dominance without alienating the West. 🔥Global Context: With Trump threatening tariffs over Greenland and Europe in crisis, this LOI positions Bharat as a stable partner for Global South nations ditching Western dependencies. It's Typical Modi Style: quiet, multilateral, and market-driven—leveraging Bharat's growth as the "largest and fastest-growing market" FOR National Security. 👉Net impact? This dilutes Saudi-Pak leverage, fragments any anti-Bharat bloc, and cements Bharat's Gulf footprint. Pakistan might hype its Saudi ties, but Bharat's UAE play is the real long-term win—economic interdependence trumps symbolic pacts. If tensions escalate (e.g., Yemen or Iran), watch how this LOI turns into concrete arms flows or joint ops. And Pakistan is the ultimate Loser as usual. SAUDI HAS ALREADY MADE IT CLEAR THAT IT WON'T INTERFERE OR SUPPORT BHIKHARISTAN IN CASE BHARAT GOES OUT FOR A WAR. Classic Modi Ji— No Noise, No Big Talks, Just Hit Hard with Pinpoint Precision 🫡
1:58

SUPER BIG! PAKISTAN CHECKMATED IN 105 MINUTES🔥 "Letter of intent was signed b/w Bharat & UAE for STRATEGIC DEFENCE PARTNERSHIP"- Vikram Misri, Frgn Sec What's Strategic Defence Partnership? 👉Deeper Military Cooperation: Joint exercises, intelligence sharing & co-production of defense tech. 👉Tech & Capability Building: Focus on advanced tech transfers, incl AI, space (via a separate LOI between IN-SPACe and UAE Space Agency), and nuclear energy (exploring small modular reactors). 👉Broader Strategic Ties: It's part of a package aiming to double bilateral trade to $200 billion by 2032, with deals on LNG supply, data centers, and investments in Bharat's Infra. PM .Narendra Modi Ji and MBZ emphasized on counter-terr0ri$m & AI collaboration during their talks. 🔥WHY THIS IS BIG? 👉Bharat's Quiet Counter-Move in a Fracturing Gulf. Bharat-UAE LOI isn't coincidental—it's a masterstroke of strategic hedging by PM Modi Ji, without the noise. It hurts the Saudi-Pak Love Affair & boosts Bharat. How- 👉UAE's Pivot Away from Saudi: Tensions between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are rising (e.g., over Yemen, OPEC quotas, and UAE's Israel ties). UAE sees Saudi's Pak-Turkey tilt as sidelining it, so it's doubling down on Bharat for SECURITY DIVERSIFICATION. This LOI signals UAE won't be isolated—Bharat provides a non-Western anchor, countering any Saudi-Pak "nuclear umbrella" narrative. 👉Countering Pak-China Influence: Pakistan's role in Saudi gives it leverage (e.g., via CPEC extensions to Gulf), but Bgarat-UAE ties disrupt that. UAE's interest in Bharatiya arms (like Akash) directly challenges Pakistani exports (e.g., JF-17 to Saudi). It also bolsters Bharat's I2U2 (India-Israel-UAE-US) grouping, indirectly countering China's Belt and Road in the region. 👉Regional Power Shift: This creates parallel power centers—Saudi-Pak-Turkey vs. Bharat-UAE (with Israel vibes). 👉Bharat gains energy security (UAE is a top oil supplier) and a counter-terr0r foothold—key amid Bhikharistan-backed extremism. For UAE, it's hedging against Saudi dominance without alienating the West. 🔥Global Context: With Trump threatening tariffs over Greenland and Europe in crisis, this LOI positions Bharat as a stable partner for Global South nations ditching Western dependencies. It's Typical Modi Style: quiet, multilateral, and market-driven—leveraging Bharat's growth as the "largest and fastest-growing market" FOR National Security. 👉Net impact? This dilutes Saudi-Pak leverage, fragments any anti-Bharat bloc, and cements Bharat's Gulf footprint. Pakistan might hype its Saudi ties, but Bharat's UAE play is the real long-term win—economic interdependence trumps symbolic pacts. If tensions escalate (e.g., Yemen or Iran), watch how this LOI turns into concrete arms flows or joint ops. And Pakistan is the ultimate Loser as usual. SAUDI HAS ALREADY MADE IT CLEAR THAT IT WON'T INTERFERE OR SUPPORT BHIKHARISTAN IN CASE BHARAT GOES OUT FOR A WAR. Classic Modi Ji— No Noise, No Big Talks, Just Hit Hard with Pinpoint Precision 🫡

BhikuMhatre

87,255 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

On the 12th night of bombing Iran over uranium enrichment, President Trump justified a Saudi nuclear programme by citing two countries in a single sentence. Iran, which enriches. And the UAE, which permanently renounced enrichment. Opposite precedents, offered together, as the model for a deal POTUS insists involves no enrichment at all. The agreement was signed Wednesday by both energy ministers. Thirty years. The official announcement mentioned no enrichment limit and no political condition. On Thursday the President added both, declaring there will be no enrichment of material and that approval is totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords. Reporting on the unpublished text says something else. Reuters says it permits enrichment and reprocessing. AP describes a possible American-built enrichment facility after a joint study, and says the package omits the IAEA protocol that lets inspectors chase undeclared sites. Until the text reaches American Congress, the statement and the terms cannot be reconciled. That same morning came a second post. Further Yemeni Houthi attacks on shipping will bring major military punishment on Iran, because the Houthis are Tehran's surrogate / proxy. Sec. Rubio, the same day, clearly said the Houthis had been smart to stay out of this war and were suckered into it, which is agency language, not command language. Set the two posts side by side and the structure shows. One very well converts affiliation into liability. The other converts alignment into access. Neither is automatic, and that is the point all together. Washington keeps the decision. Somebody else now supplies the next move. The condition may also be unmeetable. Riyadh's standing position is no normalisation without a credible path to Palestinian statehood, so the nuclear file is now wired to Israeli and Palestinian politics. And a Saudi exception may not stay Saudi. The UAE's 2009 agreement says its terms should be no less favourable than any later offered in the region. The Houthis do not own the bomber. Riyadh does not own the centrifuge. They supply the next move. Washington decides what it is permitted to mean.
0:40

On the 12th night of bombing Iran over uranium enrichment, President Trump justified a Saudi nuclear programme by citing two countries in a single sentence. Iran, which enriches. And the UAE, which permanently renounced enrichment. Opposite precedents, offered together, as the model for a deal POTUS insists involves no enrichment at all. The agreement was signed Wednesday by both energy ministers. Thirty years. The official announcement mentioned no enrichment limit and no political condition. On Thursday the President added both, declaring there will be no enrichment of material and that approval is totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords. Reporting on the unpublished text says something else. Reuters says it permits enrichment and reprocessing. AP describes a possible American-built enrichment facility after a joint study, and says the package omits the IAEA protocol that lets inspectors chase undeclared sites. Until the text reaches American Congress, the statement and the terms cannot be reconciled. That same morning came a second post. Further Yemeni Houthi attacks on shipping will bring major military punishment on Iran, because the Houthis are Tehran's surrogate / proxy. Sec. Rubio, the same day, clearly said the Houthis had been smart to stay out of this war and were suckered into it, which is agency language, not command language. Set the two posts side by side and the structure shows. One very well converts affiliation into liability. The other converts alignment into access. Neither is automatic, and that is the point all together. Washington keeps the decision. Somebody else now supplies the next move. The condition may also be unmeetable. Riyadh's standing position is no normalisation without a credible path to Palestinian statehood, so the nuclear file is now wired to Israeli and Palestinian politics. And a Saudi exception may not stay Saudi. The UAE's 2009 agreement says its terms should be no less favourable than any later offered in the region. The Houthis do not own the bomber. Riyadh does not own the centrifuge. They supply the next move. Washington decides what it is permitted to mean.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

21,103 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Many reports and on-the-ground developments point to a regional project led by the United Arab Emirates that operates behind the scenes through local proxies and questionable alliances, with the aim of fragmenting states and gaining control over strategic ports and maritime chokepoints. This approach is closely linked to political and security coordination with Israel, serving narrow interests at the expense of regional stability and Arab national security. In Yemen, this role became evident through political and military support for Aidarous Al-Zubaidi and the Southern Transitional Council. What began as influence over southern areas escalated into attempts to impose a fait accompli by force, including efforts to seize control of Hadramout and Al-Mahra—two regions of extreme strategic and security importance to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This was pursued through the creation of armed formations outside the framework of the legitimate state, the fragmentation of society, and the engineering of internal conflicts that threaten Yemen’s unity and the security of its neighbors. In Sudan, the UAE has been linked to backing specific military actors, contributing to the outbreak and prolongation of a devastating internal war that crippled state institutions and pushed the country toward de facto division. This chaos has opened the door to competition over gold, ports, and influence along the Red Sea, undermining any prospect of a stable and sovereign Sudan. In Libya, a similar pattern emerged through the financing and arming of forces operating outside the political process. This prolonged the conflict, sabotaged state-building efforts, and turned Libya into a proxy battlefield, draining its resources and exploiting its strategic location and energy wealth. In Somalia, the UAE supported separatist entities and port projects conducted outside the authority of the federal government in Mogadishu. These moves undermined Somali sovereignty and sought to impose new realities on the ground, granting Abu Dhabi direct leverage over one of the world’s most critical maritime routes near Bab Al-Mandab and the Gulf of Aden. This recurring pattern reveals a single approach: weakening sovereign states, marginalizing national armies, empowering militias, controlling ports, and then building political and economic ties with Israel under the banner of investment—while Arab peoples bear the cost. Despite all this, such schemes have failed when confronted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is not an arena for manipulation nor a state that can be encircled by militias or pressured through ports. It is a nation rooted in legitimacy, supported by its people, and anchored in deep Arab and Islamic standing. Those who have attempted to undermine or weaken it have ultimately lost—politically, morally, and historically. An Emirati commentator is seen openly calling on a terrorist known as ‘Abu Lu’lu’ah’ to slaughter innocent civilians—children, women, and the elderly—in a shocking incitement to violence.” #politics #trending #viral #conservative #liberal #democrat #republican #usa #europe #geopolitics #news #foryou #foryoupage #politicstiktok #alliesonrafah #WorldPolitics #GlobalSecurity #MiddleEast #HumanRights #Peace #Stability #Freedom #fyp #viralvideo #trendingnow #socialmedia #globalnews #Resistance #IamHere #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #RedSea #BabAlMandab #Yemen #Sudan #Libya #Somalia #HornOfAfrica #MaritimeSecurity #SaudiArabia #UAE #Israel #StateSovereignty #RegionalSecurity #ProxyWars
0:39

Many reports and on-the-ground developments point to a regional project led by the United Arab Emirates that operates behind the scenes through local proxies and questionable alliances, with the aim of fragmenting states and gaining control over strategic ports and maritime chokepoints. This approach is closely linked to political and security coordination with Israel, serving narrow interests at the expense of regional stability and Arab national security. In Yemen, this role became evident through political and military support for Aidarous Al-Zubaidi and the Southern Transitional Council. What began as influence over southern areas escalated into attempts to impose a fait accompli by force, including efforts to seize control of Hadramout and Al-Mahra—two regions of extreme strategic and security importance to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This was pursued through the creation of armed formations outside the framework of the legitimate state, the fragmentation of society, and the engineering of internal conflicts that threaten Yemen’s unity and the security of its neighbors. In Sudan, the UAE has been linked to backing specific military actors, contributing to the outbreak and prolongation of a devastating internal war that crippled state institutions and pushed the country toward de facto division. This chaos has opened the door to competition over gold, ports, and influence along the Red Sea, undermining any prospect of a stable and sovereign Sudan. In Libya, a similar pattern emerged through the financing and arming of forces operating outside the political process. This prolonged the conflict, sabotaged state-building efforts, and turned Libya into a proxy battlefield, draining its resources and exploiting its strategic location and energy wealth. In Somalia, the UAE supported separatist entities and port projects conducted outside the authority of the federal government in Mogadishu. These moves undermined Somali sovereignty and sought to impose new realities on the ground, granting Abu Dhabi direct leverage over one of the world’s most critical maritime routes near Bab Al-Mandab and the Gulf of Aden. This recurring pattern reveals a single approach: weakening sovereign states, marginalizing national armies, empowering militias, controlling ports, and then building political and economic ties with Israel under the banner of investment—while Arab peoples bear the cost. Despite all this, such schemes have failed when confronted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is not an arena for manipulation nor a state that can be encircled by militias or pressured through ports. It is a nation rooted in legitimacy, supported by its people, and anchored in deep Arab and Islamic standing. Those who have attempted to undermine or weaken it have ultimately lost—politically, morally, and historically. An Emirati commentator is seen openly calling on a terrorist known as ‘Abu Lu’lu’ah’ to slaughter innocent civilians—children, women, and the elderly—in a shocking incitement to violence.” #politics #trending #viral #conservative #liberal #democrat #republican #usa #europe #geopolitics #news #foryou #foryoupage #politicstiktok #alliesonrafah #WorldPolitics #GlobalSecurity #MiddleEast #HumanRights #Peace #Stability #Freedom #fyp #viralvideo #trendingnow #socialmedia #globalnews #Resistance #IamHere #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #RedSea #BabAlMandab #Yemen #Sudan #Libya #Somalia #HornOfAfrica #MaritimeSecurity #SaudiArabia #UAE #Israel #StateSovereignty #RegionalSecurity #ProxyWars

عبدالوهاب بن محمد القحطاني

249,076 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Leading from the front, Army Chief Gen Asim Munir's drive to recover Pakistan from its chronic economy related illnesses is moving ahead at full speed. It was an extraordinary scene at Corps Headquarters Karachi this evening. Uniformed a three-star general, and a two-star general and a brigadier took turns briefing leading business leaders on Gen Asim Munir's flagship Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). This One Window, One-Stop, bureaucratic red tape-free operation, initially designated for Middle Eastern and Chinese investors, is now open for Pakistani investors. Using a sleek PowerPoint presentation, senior Army officials spoke in an auditorium full of leading investors, promising a massive support structure made for them by the Army, including designated sites and areas, to facilitate investments in corporate farming, mining, minerals, and IT sectors. Gen Asim's team is confident that multi-billion-dollar investments from Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other GCC countries are already in the pipeline. Let's see how and when words, commitments, and intentions meet action on the ground. A promising start is definitely seen.
3:37

Leading from the front, Army Chief Gen Asim Munir's drive to recover Pakistan from its chronic economy related illnesses is moving ahead at full speed. It was an extraordinary scene at Corps Headquarters Karachi this evening. Uniformed a three-star general, and a two-star general and a brigadier took turns briefing leading business leaders on Gen Asim Munir's flagship Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). This One Window, One-Stop, bureaucratic red tape-free operation, initially designated for Middle Eastern and Chinese investors, is now open for Pakistani investors. Using a sleek PowerPoint presentation, senior Army officials spoke in an auditorium full of leading investors, promising a massive support structure made for them by the Army, including designated sites and areas, to facilitate investments in corporate farming, mining, minerals, and IT sectors. Gen Asim's team is confident that multi-billion-dollar investments from Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other GCC countries are already in the pipeline. Let's see how and when words, commitments, and intentions meet action on the ground. A promising start is definitely seen.

Kamran Khan

304,641 просмотров • 2 лет назад

President Trump’s Saudi Arabia Speech: An End to US Neo Con War Hawk Aggression and a New Era for Saudi Arabia and the Middle East ——————— The speech given by President Trump yesterday in Riyadh by invitation of HRH Mohamed bin Salman was one of the most significant US Presidential speeches of the last 25 years: a shift from the US globalist style policy of aggression and military misadventures to one of peace and prosperity. I feel fortunate to have been there in person to support this vision. The speech and direction for US policy works perfectly with the major reforms and strides that have been made over the last five years in Saudi Arabia under the leadership of HRH Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS. MBS has an incredible and bold vision for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and his people. For years he has been executing that vision with massive results. My first trip here was 18 years ago. The changes over this time, especially in the last five years, are striking. Saudi Arabia is using its natural cultural resources, its energy resources and its highly educated and motivated population to build an incredibly successful and diverse economy — all while retaining their national identity and religious and cultural values. This fits perfectly with the vision of President Trump to end the dismally failed US policies of aggression in the Middle East in favor of a rising tide that will lift all boats: a relationship of mutual benefit, not of destruction. It’s time we end the bombs and bullets and replace them with handshakes, deals, cultural exchange and prosperity. Sadly, my country has been responsible for significant problems in this region over the last several decades. Our military aggression cost the lives of over a million Iraqis and thousands of our own troops who died for a non-Constitutional misadventure fueled by the forever war military industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned us about. What the President indicated this week is that the era of the neocons and other violent globalist agendas is over for the United States and soon over for the world. We will lift sanctions on Syria, we will welcome trade, we will provide expertise and investment and, God willing, we will see the rise of the most peaceful and prosperous Middle East the world has ever seen. I am the most proud of my country I have ever been and the most enthusiastic about Saudi Arabia and the region that I’ve ever been. God bless the USA, God bless Saudi Arabia, God bless the Middle East and may God bless the world. 🇺🇸 🇸🇦 ❤️ #TrumpInKSA #SaudiUSForum2025
9:58

President Trump’s Saudi Arabia Speech: An End to US Neo Con War Hawk Aggression and a New Era for Saudi Arabia and the Middle East ——————— The speech given by President Trump yesterday in Riyadh by invitation of HRH Mohamed bin Salman was one of the most significant US Presidential speeches of the last 25 years: a shift from the US globalist style policy of aggression and military misadventures to one of peace and prosperity. I feel fortunate to have been there in person to support this vision. The speech and direction for US policy works perfectly with the major reforms and strides that have been made over the last five years in Saudi Arabia under the leadership of HRH Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS. MBS has an incredible and bold vision for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and his people. For years he has been executing that vision with massive results. My first trip here was 18 years ago. The changes over this time, especially in the last five years, are striking. Saudi Arabia is using its natural cultural resources, its energy resources and its highly educated and motivated population to build an incredibly successful and diverse economy — all while retaining their national identity and religious and cultural values. This fits perfectly with the vision of President Trump to end the dismally failed US policies of aggression in the Middle East in favor of a rising tide that will lift all boats: a relationship of mutual benefit, not of destruction. It’s time we end the bombs and bullets and replace them with handshakes, deals, cultural exchange and prosperity. Sadly, my country has been responsible for significant problems in this region over the last several decades. Our military aggression cost the lives of over a million Iraqis and thousands of our own troops who died for a non-Constitutional misadventure fueled by the forever war military industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned us about. What the President indicated this week is that the era of the neocons and other violent globalist agendas is over for the United States and soon over for the world. We will lift sanctions on Syria, we will welcome trade, we will provide expertise and investment and, God willing, we will see the rise of the most peaceful and prosperous Middle East the world has ever seen. I am the most proud of my country I have ever been and the most enthusiastic about Saudi Arabia and the region that I’ve ever been. God bless the USA, God bless Saudi Arabia, God bless the Middle East and may God bless the world. 🇺🇸 🇸🇦 ❤️ #TrumpInKSA #SaudiUSForum2025

Bruce Fenton

205,602 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sudan Confronts the UAE at the UN: Al-Harith Idriss Exposes Abu Dhabi’s Role in Fueling War At today’s United Nations session, Sudan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Al-Harith Idriss, delivered a forceful response to the UAE’s attempts to manipulate the narrative surrounding the war in Sudan. The session saw repeated exchanges between the two delegations, with Sudan directly accusing the UAE of fueling the war by funding and arming the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed), while the UAE scrambled to deflect responsibility. The UAE’s Opening Statement: A False Show of Neutrality The UAE representative began by expressing concern over the suffering of the Sudanese people, highlighting the urgent need for humanitarian aid and calling for stronger mechanisms to protect civilians. The speech was carefully crafted to present the UAE as a neutral party, advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations between both sides of the conflict. However, while Abu Dhabi attempted to position itself as a peace broker, the entire world knew that it was a key player in the war, not merely an external observer. Rather than addressing its well-documented role in fueling the war, the UAE attempted to shift the blame entirely onto "two warring generals." The representative condemned the violence, called for unrestricted humanitarian access, and even suggested adding conflict-related sexual violence as an independent criterion in the UN sanctions system. Yet, the very crimes the UAE claimed to denounce were being committed by the militia it continues to support. Al-Harith Idriss Responds: Exposing the UAE’s Criminal Role Al-Harith Idriss, Sudan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, wasted no time in dismantling the UAE’s façade of neutrality. Addressing the council, he delivered an unfiltered truth: the UAE is not a bystander in this war—it is an instigator. He accused Abu Dhabi of igniting and prolonging the war in Sudan, not out of any genuine concern for peace, but to occupy Sudan, seize its resources, and establish control through its proxies. His response was clear and backed by evidence. Idriss pointed to UN reports, congressional testimonies, and investigative findings that confirm the UAE’s support for the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). He detailed how Emirati drones and weapons have been used in at least 188 bombing raids in Darfur, how UAE aircraft have landed on dirt runways in Nyala to supply arms, and how Abu Dhabi has been using Chad as a staging ground for further attacks. He also exposed the fact that while the UAE claimed to be offering humanitarian assistance, its financial support was in fact being funneled into purchasing weapons for the militia. Sudan’s representative did not stop there. He called out the UAE for attempting to whitewash its involvement by referring vaguely to "foreign elements" in Sudan, when the only foreign actor arming and funding the militia is the UAE itself. He challenged the UN Security Council to explicitly name the UAE and hold it accountable for the destruction it has caused. The UAE’s Retaliation: Deflection and Denial In response, the UAE representative took the floor again, this time resorting to outright dismissal of Sudan’s accusations. The UAE accused Sudan of spreading "misinformation" and of using the UN platform to deflect from its own role in the conflict. With feigned indignation, the UAE insisted it was not involved in the war and was not taking sides, repeating the claim that "lies remain lies, no matter how often they are repeated." The UAE also sought to put the blame back on Sudan, questioning why the Sudanese Armed Forces had not agreed to a ceasefire and suggesting that the real obstacle to peace was Sudan’s refusal to engage in negotiations. It was a predictable attempt to divert attention from the core issue—Abu Dhabi’s direct role in sustaining the war. Al-Harith Idriss Strikes Back: The War Will Not End While the UAE Arms the Militia Unmoved by the UAE’s deflections, Al-Harith Idriss took the floor once again. He reiterated that Sudan was not making baseless allegations but presenting documented evidence that the UAE has fueled the war by equipping and financing the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). He reminded the council that Sudan had submitted a 74-page official complaint detailing the UAE’s role, citing reports from neutral institutions and testimony presented to the U.S. Congress. Idriss made it clear that the war would not stop while the UAE continued to support the militia. The Sudanese Armed Forces were fighting to reclaim the country from an armed group backed by a foreign power, not engaging in a meaningless internal dispute. He called on the UN to stop pretending this was a conflict between internal factions and recognize it for what it truly is: a foreign-backed attempt to destabilize Sudan and seize control of its resources. The UAE’s Last Word: A Desperate Attempt to Save Face Despite the overwhelming evidence against it, the UAE insisted on having the final word. Its representative once again accused Sudan of misrepresenting the situation, claiming that if Sudan’s leadership truly wanted peace, it would agree to a ceasefire and engage in dialogue rather than continuing military operations. The UAE accused Sudan of blocking humanitarian aid and attempting to spread "disinformation" to shift blame. Sudan’s Stand: No Peace While the UAE Fuels War The message from Sudan was clear: this war is not about two generals—it is about a nation resisting a foreign-backed occupation. The UAE has spent billions funding and arming a terrorist militia while pretending to call for peace. But Sudan sees through the deception. Sudan left no room for doubt—the war will only end when the UAE ceases its support for the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). Until then, Sudan will continue to fight, not just for its land, but for its sovereignty, its people, and its future. #Sudan #UAEKillsSudanesePeople
12:55

Sudan Confronts the UAE at the UN: Al-Harith Idriss Exposes Abu Dhabi’s Role in Fueling War At today’s United Nations session, Sudan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Al-Harith Idriss, delivered a forceful response to the UAE’s attempts to manipulate the narrative surrounding the war in Sudan. The session saw repeated exchanges between the two delegations, with Sudan directly accusing the UAE of fueling the war by funding and arming the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed), while the UAE scrambled to deflect responsibility. The UAE’s Opening Statement: A False Show of Neutrality The UAE representative began by expressing concern over the suffering of the Sudanese people, highlighting the urgent need for humanitarian aid and calling for stronger mechanisms to protect civilians. The speech was carefully crafted to present the UAE as a neutral party, advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations between both sides of the conflict. However, while Abu Dhabi attempted to position itself as a peace broker, the entire world knew that it was a key player in the war, not merely an external observer. Rather than addressing its well-documented role in fueling the war, the UAE attempted to shift the blame entirely onto "two warring generals." The representative condemned the violence, called for unrestricted humanitarian access, and even suggested adding conflict-related sexual violence as an independent criterion in the UN sanctions system. Yet, the very crimes the UAE claimed to denounce were being committed by the militia it continues to support. Al-Harith Idriss Responds: Exposing the UAE’s Criminal Role Al-Harith Idriss, Sudan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, wasted no time in dismantling the UAE’s façade of neutrality. Addressing the council, he delivered an unfiltered truth: the UAE is not a bystander in this war—it is an instigator. He accused Abu Dhabi of igniting and prolonging the war in Sudan, not out of any genuine concern for peace, but to occupy Sudan, seize its resources, and establish control through its proxies. His response was clear and backed by evidence. Idriss pointed to UN reports, congressional testimonies, and investigative findings that confirm the UAE’s support for the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). He detailed how Emirati drones and weapons have been used in at least 188 bombing raids in Darfur, how UAE aircraft have landed on dirt runways in Nyala to supply arms, and how Abu Dhabi has been using Chad as a staging ground for further attacks. He also exposed the fact that while the UAE claimed to be offering humanitarian assistance, its financial support was in fact being funneled into purchasing weapons for the militia. Sudan’s representative did not stop there. He called out the UAE for attempting to whitewash its involvement by referring vaguely to "foreign elements" in Sudan, when the only foreign actor arming and funding the militia is the UAE itself. He challenged the UN Security Council to explicitly name the UAE and hold it accountable for the destruction it has caused. The UAE’s Retaliation: Deflection and Denial In response, the UAE representative took the floor again, this time resorting to outright dismissal of Sudan’s accusations. The UAE accused Sudan of spreading "misinformation" and of using the UN platform to deflect from its own role in the conflict. With feigned indignation, the UAE insisted it was not involved in the war and was not taking sides, repeating the claim that "lies remain lies, no matter how often they are repeated." The UAE also sought to put the blame back on Sudan, questioning why the Sudanese Armed Forces had not agreed to a ceasefire and suggesting that the real obstacle to peace was Sudan’s refusal to engage in negotiations. It was a predictable attempt to divert attention from the core issue—Abu Dhabi’s direct role in sustaining the war. Al-Harith Idriss Strikes Back: The War Will Not End While the UAE Arms the Militia Unmoved by the UAE’s deflections, Al-Harith Idriss took the floor once again. He reiterated that Sudan was not making baseless allegations but presenting documented evidence that the UAE has fueled the war by equipping and financing the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). He reminded the council that Sudan had submitted a 74-page official complaint detailing the UAE’s role, citing reports from neutral institutions and testimony presented to the U.S. Congress. Idriss made it clear that the war would not stop while the UAE continued to support the militia. The Sudanese Armed Forces were fighting to reclaim the country from an armed group backed by a foreign power, not engaging in a meaningless internal dispute. He called on the UN to stop pretending this was a conflict between internal factions and recognize it for what it truly is: a foreign-backed attempt to destabilize Sudan and seize control of its resources. The UAE’s Last Word: A Desperate Attempt to Save Face Despite the overwhelming evidence against it, the UAE insisted on having the final word. Its representative once again accused Sudan of misrepresenting the situation, claiming that if Sudan’s leadership truly wanted peace, it would agree to a ceasefire and engage in dialogue rather than continuing military operations. The UAE accused Sudan of blocking humanitarian aid and attempting to spread "disinformation" to shift blame. Sudan’s Stand: No Peace While the UAE Fuels War The message from Sudan was clear: this war is not about two generals—it is about a nation resisting a foreign-backed occupation. The UAE has spent billions funding and arming a terrorist militia while pretending to call for peace. But Sudan sees through the deception. Sudan left no room for doubt—the war will only end when the UAE ceases its support for the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). Until then, Sudan will continue to fight, not just for its land, but for its sovereignty, its people, and its future. #Sudan #UAEKillsSudanesePeople

Sudanese Echo

20,604 просмотров • 1 год назад

🎥 The “Day After” the Iran War: Amir Handjani of the Quincy Institute tells Ryan Grim and Murtaza Hussain that the war has cracked open the Gulf Cooperation Council’s (GCC) deep divisions. One coalition, led by Oman, Qatar, and increasingly Saudi Arabia, is hunting for diplomatic offramps and a day-after arrangement with Iran. The other — Bahrain and Kuwait, with the UAE somewhere in between — is against any day-after engagement. These countries have kept their territory open as US launching pads. Most Gulf states, he notes, weren’t consulted on the war, briefly hoped it would topple Iran, and within weeks realized it wouldn’t. Handjani argues the Gulf states will hedge after the war: not abandon the US umbrella, but diversify, because the bases aren’t coming back and Iran won’t tolerate a heavy US presence near its borders again. He sees the Gulf, Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, and Egypt eventually building a collective security architecture with Washington as a guarantor of last resort. Amir Handjani | Ryan Grim | Murtaza Hussain
7:28

🎥 The “Day After” the Iran War: Amir Handjani of the Quincy Institute tells Ryan Grim and Murtaza Hussain that the war has cracked open the Gulf Cooperation Council’s (GCC) deep divisions. One coalition, led by Oman, Qatar, and increasingly Saudi Arabia, is hunting for diplomatic offramps and a day-after arrangement with Iran. The other — Bahrain and Kuwait, with the UAE somewhere in between — is against any day-after engagement. These countries have kept their territory open as US launching pads. Most Gulf states, he notes, weren’t consulted on the war, briefly hoped it would topple Iran, and within weeks realized it wouldn’t. Handjani argues the Gulf states will hedge after the war: not abandon the US umbrella, but diversify, because the bases aren’t coming back and Iran won’t tolerate a heavy US presence near its borders again. He sees the Gulf, Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, and Egypt eventually building a collective security architecture with Washington as a guarantor of last resort. Amir Handjani | Ryan Grim | Murtaza Hussain

Drop Site

39,571 просмотров • 20 дней назад

🚨 WARNING: America Is For Sale The EB-5 Visa Is the Pipeline Supercharging Saudi and OIC Influence in Miami How a U.S. investor-visa program gives foreign Islamic power brokers a direct path into America’s institutions — and why conservatives are sounding the alarm. The moment you understand what is happening in Miami — the expansion of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s aggressive acquisition strategy, and the political machinery of the OIC — the EB-5 “Investor Visa” program becomes the final and most dangerous piece of the pipeline. ⚡ Quick Explainer: What Is the OIC? The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is a 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc — the second-largest organization in the world after the UN. Saudi Arabia sits at its center. The OIC acts as the collective political arm of the Islamic world, using its unified voting bloc to: drive UN resolutions push global “Islamophobia” standards pressure Western governments export Islamic-aligned legal and cultural norms PIF is the financial engine. The OIC is the political engine. Together they form a coordinated influence strategy. ⚠️ 1. EB-5 Turns U.S. Residency Into a Commodity for Foreign Powers Saudi Arabia and OIC-aligned states don’t immigrate — they invest. EB-5 was built for wealthy foreign nationals, including: state-linked businessmen sovereign fund executives politically connected elites Through EB-5, they can: buy into U.S. real estate obtain permanent residency embed financial networks influence political structures secure long-term footholds All without assimilating or aligning with American interests. This is why conservatives call EB-5: “A citizenship-for-sale program that invites foreign strategic penetration.” ⚠️ 2. EB-5 Is Used by High-Risk Foreign Nationals DHS, FBI, and Senate investigations have repeatedly documented EB-5 applicants from: China (including CCP-linked elites) Gulf monarchies Pakistan Turkey Qatar Saudi Arabia Many are tied directly or indirectly to: state ministries royal families (HELLO SAUDI ARABIA) sovereign funds intelligence-linked networks EB-5 is exactly the type of gateway Saudi Arabia would exploit to plant long-term influence inside America — including Miami. ⚠️ 3. Miami Is One of the Biggest EB-5 Hubs in America Miami real estate has relied on foreign capital for more than a decade, and EB-5 money has flowed into its largest developments. Combine that with: Saudi Arabia building a PIF command center in Miami direct PIF investment offices Saudi-funded conferences new Miami–Riyadh flight routes Miami being positioned as the Saudi hub for Latin America Add EB-5, and Miami becomes: a turnkey gateway for Saudi and OIC-aligned elites to embed themselves permanently into Florida’s political and economic system. This is exactly what conservatives have been warning about. ⚠️ 4. EB-5 Has a Long, Documented History of Fraud and Manipulation Federal investigations have repeatedly confirmed EB-5’s vulnerabilities: Funds diverted for political influence money laundering stolen investor capital fake job-creation claims compromised “regional centers” foreign intelligence-linked applicants Miami’s real-estate market — already a magnet for foreign capital — becomes exponentially more dangerous when combined with: PIF money Saudi strategic interests OIC ideological goals political cheerleaders like Mayor Francis Suarez This is why conservatives view EB-5 as a national security threat, not an economic tool. ⚠️ 5. EB-5 Is the Perfect Vehicle for “Soft Conquest” Saudi Arabia openly describes its strategy: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → systems → influence → power. EB-5 aligns perfectly with that model: embeds foreign Islamic influence on U.S. soil creates permanent legal residency buys political and commercial access builds local economic dependency normalizes long-term foreign presence in American communities From the conservative perspective, this is how a foreign state captures a city without firing a shot. 🔥 BOTTOM LINE Now that Saudi Arabia’s PIF is openly establishing Miami as its American gateway, the EB-5 investor-visa program becomes the most dangerous loophole of all - a direct pipeline for OIC-aligned foreign elites to purchase residency, real estate, influence, and long-term power inside Florida. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED - WHY ARE WE HELPING OUR ENEMIES CONQUER US?
0:44

🚨 WARNING: America Is For Sale The EB-5 Visa Is the Pipeline Supercharging Saudi and OIC Influence in Miami How a U.S. investor-visa program gives foreign Islamic power brokers a direct path into America’s institutions — and why conservatives are sounding the alarm. The moment you understand what is happening in Miami — the expansion of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s aggressive acquisition strategy, and the political machinery of the OIC — the EB-5 “Investor Visa” program becomes the final and most dangerous piece of the pipeline. ⚡ Quick Explainer: What Is the OIC? The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is a 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc — the second-largest organization in the world after the UN. Saudi Arabia sits at its center. The OIC acts as the collective political arm of the Islamic world, using its unified voting bloc to: drive UN resolutions push global “Islamophobia” standards pressure Western governments export Islamic-aligned legal and cultural norms PIF is the financial engine. The OIC is the political engine. Together they form a coordinated influence strategy. ⚠️ 1. EB-5 Turns U.S. Residency Into a Commodity for Foreign Powers Saudi Arabia and OIC-aligned states don’t immigrate — they invest. EB-5 was built for wealthy foreign nationals, including: state-linked businessmen sovereign fund executives politically connected elites Through EB-5, they can: buy into U.S. real estate obtain permanent residency embed financial networks influence political structures secure long-term footholds All without assimilating or aligning with American interests. This is why conservatives call EB-5: “A citizenship-for-sale program that invites foreign strategic penetration.” ⚠️ 2. EB-5 Is Used by High-Risk Foreign Nationals DHS, FBI, and Senate investigations have repeatedly documented EB-5 applicants from: China (including CCP-linked elites) Gulf monarchies Pakistan Turkey Qatar Saudi Arabia Many are tied directly or indirectly to: state ministries royal families (HELLO SAUDI ARABIA) sovereign funds intelligence-linked networks EB-5 is exactly the type of gateway Saudi Arabia would exploit to plant long-term influence inside America — including Miami. ⚠️ 3. Miami Is One of the Biggest EB-5 Hubs in America Miami real estate has relied on foreign capital for more than a decade, and EB-5 money has flowed into its largest developments. Combine that with: Saudi Arabia building a PIF command center in Miami direct PIF investment offices Saudi-funded conferences new Miami–Riyadh flight routes Miami being positioned as the Saudi hub for Latin America Add EB-5, and Miami becomes: a turnkey gateway for Saudi and OIC-aligned elites to embed themselves permanently into Florida’s political and economic system. This is exactly what conservatives have been warning about. ⚠️ 4. EB-5 Has a Long, Documented History of Fraud and Manipulation Federal investigations have repeatedly confirmed EB-5’s vulnerabilities: Funds diverted for political influence money laundering stolen investor capital fake job-creation claims compromised “regional centers” foreign intelligence-linked applicants Miami’s real-estate market — already a magnet for foreign capital — becomes exponentially more dangerous when combined with: PIF money Saudi strategic interests OIC ideological goals political cheerleaders like Mayor Francis Suarez This is why conservatives view EB-5 as a national security threat, not an economic tool. ⚠️ 5. EB-5 Is the Perfect Vehicle for “Soft Conquest” Saudi Arabia openly describes its strategy: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → systems → influence → power. EB-5 aligns perfectly with that model: embeds foreign Islamic influence on U.S. soil creates permanent legal residency buys political and commercial access builds local economic dependency normalizes long-term foreign presence in American communities From the conservative perspective, this is how a foreign state captures a city without firing a shot. 🔥 BOTTOM LINE Now that Saudi Arabia’s PIF is openly establishing Miami as its American gateway, the EB-5 investor-visa program becomes the most dangerous loophole of all - a direct pipeline for OIC-aligned foreign elites to purchase residency, real estate, influence, and long-term power inside Florida. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED - WHY ARE WE HELPING OUR ENEMIES CONQUER US?

Amy Mek

76,991 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

ركزوا جيدًا… عندما أعلنت صوماليلاند انفصالها كانت السعودية من أكثر الأنظمة رفضًا وارتباكًا… والسبب ليس حرصًا على “وحدة الدول” كما يروّج إعلامها، بل خوفًا على شبكة مصالحها القديمة في النفط والغاز التي امتدت لسنوات في اليمن والصومال والسودان وأجزاء من ليبيا عبر واجهات قبلية وشخصيات متنفذة تعمل لحسابها. اكتشاف مئات الآبار في صوماليلاند أربك الحسابات… فلم نسمع ضجيجًا ولا تهديدًا ولا تدخلاً مباشرًا، لأن الملف كان خارج قدرتهم على المناورة. الدعم الاسرائيلي الذي حظي به هناك قيّد الحركة، فاختفى الصراخ فجأة. النظام السعودي كان يدعم الجماعات الارهابية في هذه الدول ويسيطر على النفط الخام اليوم يجري التحقق من تلك الحقول التي استُغلت طويلًا بعيدًا عن أعين الشعوب، بينما كانت المنطقة تغرق في الفوضى والصراعات. التاريخ واضح: من عاش سنوات يعبث بثروات الضعفاء ويغذي الأزمات لحماية نفوذه… لن يهرب من لحظة الحساب. الأيام تدور… والحقائق لا تبقى مخفية السعودية ارتكبت جرائم حرب حيث انها كانت ولا زالت تدعم الجماعات الارهابية التي في الصومال واليمن والسودان وليبيا يجب على دولة الصومال إنّ تحذوا حذو صوماليلاند وتكشف الانتهاكات الخطيرة التي يرتكبها نظام السعودية بحق الثروات النفطية الصومالية انتهى وقت التكتيم والنظام السعودي سينهار إذا قطعتم يد المتنفذين والعصابات التي تخدمهم في دولكم الفقيرة #Somaliland #السعوديه_تدعم_الارهاب Focus carefully… When Somaliland declared its separation, Saudi Arabia was among the most rejecting and alarmed regimes — not out of concern for “territorial unity” as its media claims, but out of fear for its long-standing network of oil and gas interests that stretched across Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and parts of Libya through tribal fronts and influential figures operating on its behalf. The discovery of hundreds of wells in Somaliland disrupted those calculations… there was no noise, no threats, no direct intervention, because the file was beyond their ability to maneuver. The Israeli backing there restricted movement, and the shouting suddenly disappeared. The Saudi regime was supporting militant groups in these countries while controlling crude resources. Today, those fields are being examined after being exploited for years away from the eyes of the people, while the region drowned in conflict and instability. History is clear: Whoever spent years manipulating the wealth of the weak and fueling crises to protect influence… will not escape accountability. Days turn… and truths do not remain hidden. Saudi Arabia committed war crimes by supporting armed groups in Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, and Libya. The Somali state must follow Somaliland’s path and expose the serious violations committed against Somali oil resources. The era of silence is over — and the Saudi regime will collapse once the hands of the influential networks and gangs serving it in your poor countries are cut off. #Somaliland #Saudi_Arabia_supports_terrorism
0:37

ركزوا جيدًا… عندما أعلنت صوماليلاند انفصالها كانت السعودية من أكثر الأنظمة رفضًا وارتباكًا… والسبب ليس حرصًا على “وحدة الدول” كما يروّج إعلامها، بل خوفًا على شبكة مصالحها القديمة في النفط والغاز التي امتدت لسنوات في اليمن والصومال والسودان وأجزاء من ليبيا عبر واجهات قبلية وشخصيات متنفذة تعمل لحسابها. اكتشاف مئات الآبار في صوماليلاند أربك الحسابات… فلم نسمع ضجيجًا ولا تهديدًا ولا تدخلاً مباشرًا، لأن الملف كان خارج قدرتهم على المناورة. الدعم الاسرائيلي الذي حظي به هناك قيّد الحركة، فاختفى الصراخ فجأة. النظام السعودي كان يدعم الجماعات الارهابية في هذه الدول ويسيطر على النفط الخام اليوم يجري التحقق من تلك الحقول التي استُغلت طويلًا بعيدًا عن أعين الشعوب، بينما كانت المنطقة تغرق في الفوضى والصراعات. التاريخ واضح: من عاش سنوات يعبث بثروات الضعفاء ويغذي الأزمات لحماية نفوذه… لن يهرب من لحظة الحساب. الأيام تدور… والحقائق لا تبقى مخفية السعودية ارتكبت جرائم حرب حيث انها كانت ولا زالت تدعم الجماعات الارهابية التي في الصومال واليمن والسودان وليبيا يجب على دولة الصومال إنّ تحذوا حذو صوماليلاند وتكشف الانتهاكات الخطيرة التي يرتكبها نظام السعودية بحق الثروات النفطية الصومالية انتهى وقت التكتيم والنظام السعودي سينهار إذا قطعتم يد المتنفذين والعصابات التي تخدمهم في دولكم الفقيرة #Somaliland #السعوديه_تدعم_الارهاب Focus carefully… When Somaliland declared its separation, Saudi Arabia was among the most rejecting and alarmed regimes — not out of concern for “territorial unity” as its media claims, but out of fear for its long-standing network of oil and gas interests that stretched across Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and parts of Libya through tribal fronts and influential figures operating on its behalf. The discovery of hundreds of wells in Somaliland disrupted those calculations… there was no noise, no threats, no direct intervention, because the file was beyond their ability to maneuver. The Israeli backing there restricted movement, and the shouting suddenly disappeared. The Saudi regime was supporting militant groups in these countries while controlling crude resources. Today, those fields are being examined after being exploited for years away from the eyes of the people, while the region drowned in conflict and instability. History is clear: Whoever spent years manipulating the wealth of the weak and fueling crises to protect influence… will not escape accountability. Days turn… and truths do not remain hidden. Saudi Arabia committed war crimes by supporting armed groups in Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, and Libya. The Somali state must follow Somaliland’s path and expose the serious violations committed against Somali oil resources. The era of silence is over — and the Saudi regime will collapse once the hands of the influential networks and gangs serving it in your poor countries are cut off. #Somaliland #Saudi_Arabia_supports_terrorism

ARAB TOP القمة العربية

42,558 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🎙️ Alice Weidel and her unapologetic double standards By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 Contrary to what indignant comments might suggest, Alice Weidel is not "relativizing" international law: she is pointing out a structural contradiction in the Western order. Yes, Russia violated international law by invading Ukraine in 2022, and the UN has stated this unequivocally. But reducing the conflict to a simple duel between good and evil allows us to avoid an embarrassing question: were Russian security interests taken into account at any point? For more than 20 years, Moscow has officially stated that NATO's expansion eastward is a red line. This position has been documented, repeated, and archived. Pretending to discover it after the fact is less a matter of strategic analysis than moral theater. Where Weidel becomes truly disturbing is in her comparison with the United States. The Monroe Doctrine, formulated in 1823 and regularly reactivated by Washington, is based on a clear principle: no hostile power should establish itself within the American sphere of influence. Latin America, Canada, the Caribbean—all of these are considered America's "backyard." This doctrine is not a myth: it is claimed, applied, and assumed. Donald Trump has simply removed the diplomatic veneer. Venezuela, for example, is explicitly targeted by Washington for its ties to Russia and China, not for humanitarian reasons, but for geostrategic ones. This is exactly the kind of reasoning that the West refuses to hear when it comes from Moscow. 👉 The comparison is therefore accurate, and that is precisely what makes it uncomfortable. Spheres of influence, red lines, no-go zones: the vocabulary is identical. Only the flags and the language have changed. The difference between Trump and Putin is not doctrinal. It is political and media-related. Trump applies imperial logic even against his NATO allies, threatening them with sanctions, tariffs, or abandoning their security. Putin, on the other hand, is in direct opposition to the Western bloc. One is described as "unpredictable," the other as an "aggressor." The principle, however, remains the same. 😏 In summary: When Washington talks about security, it means stability. When Moscow talks about it, it means paranoia. Geopolitics loves universal rules... as long as they are strictly unilateral.
1:47

🎙️ Alice Weidel and her unapologetic double standards By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 Contrary to what indignant comments might suggest, Alice Weidel is not "relativizing" international law: she is pointing out a structural contradiction in the Western order. Yes, Russia violated international law by invading Ukraine in 2022, and the UN has stated this unequivocally. But reducing the conflict to a simple duel between good and evil allows us to avoid an embarrassing question: were Russian security interests taken into account at any point? For more than 20 years, Moscow has officially stated that NATO's expansion eastward is a red line. This position has been documented, repeated, and archived. Pretending to discover it after the fact is less a matter of strategic analysis than moral theater. Where Weidel becomes truly disturbing is in her comparison with the United States. The Monroe Doctrine, formulated in 1823 and regularly reactivated by Washington, is based on a clear principle: no hostile power should establish itself within the American sphere of influence. Latin America, Canada, the Caribbean—all of these are considered America's "backyard." This doctrine is not a myth: it is claimed, applied, and assumed. Donald Trump has simply removed the diplomatic veneer. Venezuela, for example, is explicitly targeted by Washington for its ties to Russia and China, not for humanitarian reasons, but for geostrategic ones. This is exactly the kind of reasoning that the West refuses to hear when it comes from Moscow. 👉 The comparison is therefore accurate, and that is precisely what makes it uncomfortable. Spheres of influence, red lines, no-go zones: the vocabulary is identical. Only the flags and the language have changed. The difference between Trump and Putin is not doctrinal. It is political and media-related. Trump applies imperial logic even against his NATO allies, threatening them with sanctions, tariffs, or abandoning their security. Putin, on the other hand, is in direct opposition to the Western bloc. One is described as "unpredictable," the other as an "aggressor." The principle, however, remains the same. 😏 In summary: When Washington talks about security, it means stability. When Moscow talks about it, it means paranoia. Geopolitics loves universal rules... as long as they are strictly unilateral.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

10,906 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Iran war, day 63 summary! Charlatan in chief never skips a beat! -Trump says he's "not satisfied" with the peace deal proposal What peace deal? -Iran demands end to fake blockade -nuclear and missile program remain -SOH remains restricted New unhinged Trump rant! -“We destroyed everything in Iran thanks to our Israeli ally and the wonderful blockade that prevented them from exporting.” -The Iranian navy, which was the strongest regionally (it was?), has been completely destroyed -159 of its ships are now at the bottom of the sea -Iran is now without air defenses or radar systems, and its military capabilities have been completely paralyzed. -Iran should not have nuclear weapons, and military confrontation with it was necessary. -Gas prices will drop quickly once the situation in Iran is over, and may be cheaper than they were. Ex-Trump national advisor Bolton: “Trump talks about a deal with Iran to lower oil prices” Meanwhile, -“I think [his words] are a kind of market manipulation to show that everything is fine.” This is market manipulation! -He says a deal could happen at any moment and the blockade is working great. His main goal is to lower oil prices. -There has been a big jump in oil prices now, and I think Trump is reacting to this again The Trump regime only cares about the stock market and price of oil! And that’s why Mossad agents representing the negotiating team!! Kushner, Witkoff and their ulterior motives! (NY Times) The Trump regime has turned the art of peacemaking, into a business Representative Jamie Raskin wrote: -"You cannot be a loyal representative of the US while billions of dollars of Saudi and UAE money are priority -Kushner’s property is affinity partners -both kosher agents previous meetings with Iran failed because they did not fully grasp the complexities of nuclear issues. In fact they fully grasp the issue from Israel’s perspective, which is that Iran cannot have a viable nuclear program. Iran demands reparations from the US, Israel and the GCC terror states! Iran's Rep to the UN responds to a letter from Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan to the United Nations and the Security Council: “Those countries participated in the aggression against Iran through bases on their territories from which the fire and air raids were launched.” “Iran exercised its legitimate right to self-defense, which is enshrined in the UN Charter, in response to the aggression.” “Iran was not the initiator of the fighting.” “The countries that participated or allowed the use of their bases, airspace, waters, and territories to launch aggression against Iran are responsible and must be held accountable.” “The failure of the UNSC to condemn the aggression and identify the aggressors has played a role in encouraging the aggressors to continue the aggression.” “We demand that each of Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan bear responsibility for full compensation to Iran for the damage.” Operation Stargate has been impeded! Amazon Closures in UAE and Bahrain Amazon announced: -Direct damage to hardware equipment estimated at over $850 million. -there’s complete outage of 37 critical services -disruption of access for over 12,000 enterprise and government customers across the region. -Tech reports indicate that over 40% of data storage capacity in the affected centers requires physical recovery.
0:09

Iran war, day 63 summary! Charlatan in chief never skips a beat! -Trump says he's "not satisfied" with the peace deal proposal What peace deal? -Iran demands end to fake blockade -nuclear and missile program remain -SOH remains restricted New unhinged Trump rant! -“We destroyed everything in Iran thanks to our Israeli ally and the wonderful blockade that prevented them from exporting.” -The Iranian navy, which was the strongest regionally (it was?), has been completely destroyed -159 of its ships are now at the bottom of the sea -Iran is now without air defenses or radar systems, and its military capabilities have been completely paralyzed. -Iran should not have nuclear weapons, and military confrontation with it was necessary. -Gas prices will drop quickly once the situation in Iran is over, and may be cheaper than they were. Ex-Trump national advisor Bolton: “Trump talks about a deal with Iran to lower oil prices” Meanwhile, -“I think [his words] are a kind of market manipulation to show that everything is fine.” This is market manipulation! -He says a deal could happen at any moment and the blockade is working great. His main goal is to lower oil prices. -There has been a big jump in oil prices now, and I think Trump is reacting to this again The Trump regime only cares about the stock market and price of oil! And that’s why Mossad agents representing the negotiating team!! Kushner, Witkoff and their ulterior motives! (NY Times) The Trump regime has turned the art of peacemaking, into a business Representative Jamie Raskin wrote: -"You cannot be a loyal representative of the US while billions of dollars of Saudi and UAE money are priority -Kushner’s property is affinity partners -both kosher agents previous meetings with Iran failed because they did not fully grasp the complexities of nuclear issues. In fact they fully grasp the issue from Israel’s perspective, which is that Iran cannot have a viable nuclear program. Iran demands reparations from the US, Israel and the GCC terror states! Iran's Rep to the UN responds to a letter from Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan to the United Nations and the Security Council: “Those countries participated in the aggression against Iran through bases on their territories from which the fire and air raids were launched.” “Iran exercised its legitimate right to self-defense, which is enshrined in the UN Charter, in response to the aggression.” “Iran was not the initiator of the fighting.” “The countries that participated or allowed the use of their bases, airspace, waters, and territories to launch aggression against Iran are responsible and must be held accountable.” “The failure of the UNSC to condemn the aggression and identify the aggressors has played a role in encouraging the aggressors to continue the aggression.” “We demand that each of Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Jordan bear responsibility for full compensation to Iran for the damage.” Operation Stargate has been impeded! Amazon Closures in UAE and Bahrain Amazon announced: -Direct damage to hardware equipment estimated at over $850 million. -there’s complete outage of 37 critical services -disruption of access for over 12,000 enterprise and government customers across the region. -Tech reports indicate that over 40% of data storage capacity in the affected centers requires physical recovery.

Truth_teller 🇷🇺

13,570 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 WARNING FLORIDA (EXCLUSIVE) WELCOME TO FLORIDARABIA - Miami Is Being Rebuilt as Saudi Arabia’s U.S. Gateway Don’t be fooled for a second. This isn’t “business.” Saudi Arabia just openly announced its plan to turn Miami into its American outpost — and our own officials applauded it like servants praising a new master. What happened in Miami was not a “forum.” It was a foreign Islamic government presenting its long-term strategy to enter, influence, and reshape American institutions. And standing proudly beside them? Miami’s scandal-plagued Mayor Francis Suarez — smiling next to his “friend,” Princess Reema Bandar Al Saud, one of the most powerful members of the Saudi royal family. From the stage, she openly revealed Saudi Arabia’s goal: “Saudi is your gateway to the Middle East… we hold a very strong position in the Islamic world.” Translation? 🔥 Miami becomes their gateway into America. This is strategic penetration of America’s financial, political, media, and cultural networks — not trade, not partnership, but influence-building by an authoritarian Islamic monarchy. And Suarez celebrated every inch of it: ✔ Importing Riyadh conferences into Miami ✔ Establishing a PIF office on U.S. soil ✔ Opening direct Miami–Riyadh flight routes ✔ Positioning Miami as Saudi Arabia’s hub for Latin America Anyone who understands the PIF knows exactly what this means. Saudi Arabia’s PIF doesn’t “invest.” It acquires leverage by buying: • media conglomerates • sports leagues • tech infrastructure • political access • cultural influence And right now, the most dangerous move yet is happening: DANGEROUS TIP 🔥 Hollywood insiders report the PIF is close to buying Warner Bros. Discovery, which includes CNN, HBO, DC Comics, Discovery, and Warner Bros. Studios. (Estimated offer of 70+ billion) A foreign Islamic government's sovereign wealth fund could soon control one of America’s largest media empires. Princess Reema explained the strategy bluntly: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → Systems Systems → Influence Influence → Power This is how nations are captured. ⭐ THE PART YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO NOTICE Saudi Arabia is not acting alone. It sits at the center of the OIC — the 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc that represents nearly two billion Muslims and operates as a unified political machine. The OIC is not “just another group.” It is the second-most powerful intergovernmental body on Earth, after the UN. (Republican's and Democrats are SILENT ABOUT THIS) And it functions with one explicit mandate: advance Islamic political, cultural, and legal norms worldwide. The OIC: 🔺controls UN resolutions through a coordinated Islamic voting bloc 🔺pushes global “Islamophobia” and “hate-speech” laws designed to criminalize criticism 🔺pressures Western governments to adopt Islamic-aligned policies 🔺operates as the Islamic world’s centralized diplomatic engine Meanwhile, the PIF is the Islamic world’s financial weapon. Together, they form a unified strategy: The OIC pushes the ideology. The PIF buys the territory. Miami is being positioned as the American entry point for both. 🔥 THE BOTTOM LINE This is not economic development. This is foreign ideological expansion, announced in the open. Florida is being pulled under the influence of: • The financial machinery of Saudi Arabia’s PIF • Saudi Arabia’s expansion strategy into Latin America • The OIC — the global Islamic political bloc guiding the ideological direction If Floridians don’t wake up now, Miami will become the Western command center of a foreign state-driven Islamic political empire — with the money, networks, and global leverage to reshape American culture, policy, and institutions far beyond anything voters ever approved.
3:08

🚨 WARNING FLORIDA (EXCLUSIVE) WELCOME TO FLORIDARABIA - Miami Is Being Rebuilt as Saudi Arabia’s U.S. Gateway Don’t be fooled for a second. This isn’t “business.” Saudi Arabia just openly announced its plan to turn Miami into its American outpost — and our own officials applauded it like servants praising a new master. What happened in Miami was not a “forum.” It was a foreign Islamic government presenting its long-term strategy to enter, influence, and reshape American institutions. And standing proudly beside them? Miami’s scandal-plagued Mayor Francis Suarez — smiling next to his “friend,” Princess Reema Bandar Al Saud, one of the most powerful members of the Saudi royal family. From the stage, she openly revealed Saudi Arabia’s goal: “Saudi is your gateway to the Middle East… we hold a very strong position in the Islamic world.” Translation? 🔥 Miami becomes their gateway into America. This is strategic penetration of America’s financial, political, media, and cultural networks — not trade, not partnership, but influence-building by an authoritarian Islamic monarchy. And Suarez celebrated every inch of it: ✔ Importing Riyadh conferences into Miami ✔ Establishing a PIF office on U.S. soil ✔ Opening direct Miami–Riyadh flight routes ✔ Positioning Miami as Saudi Arabia’s hub for Latin America Anyone who understands the PIF knows exactly what this means. Saudi Arabia’s PIF doesn’t “invest.” It acquires leverage by buying: • media conglomerates • sports leagues • tech infrastructure • political access • cultural influence And right now, the most dangerous move yet is happening: DANGEROUS TIP 🔥 Hollywood insiders report the PIF is close to buying Warner Bros. Discovery, which includes CNN, HBO, DC Comics, Discovery, and Warner Bros. Studios. (Estimated offer of 70+ billion) A foreign Islamic government's sovereign wealth fund could soon control one of America’s largest media empires. Princess Reema explained the strategy bluntly: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → Systems Systems → Influence Influence → Power This is how nations are captured. ⭐ THE PART YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO NOTICE Saudi Arabia is not acting alone. It sits at the center of the OIC — the 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc that represents nearly two billion Muslims and operates as a unified political machine. The OIC is not “just another group.” It is the second-most powerful intergovernmental body on Earth, after the UN. (Republican's and Democrats are SILENT ABOUT THIS) And it functions with one explicit mandate: advance Islamic political, cultural, and legal norms worldwide. The OIC: 🔺controls UN resolutions through a coordinated Islamic voting bloc 🔺pushes global “Islamophobia” and “hate-speech” laws designed to criminalize criticism 🔺pressures Western governments to adopt Islamic-aligned policies 🔺operates as the Islamic world’s centralized diplomatic engine Meanwhile, the PIF is the Islamic world’s financial weapon. Together, they form a unified strategy: The OIC pushes the ideology. The PIF buys the territory. Miami is being positioned as the American entry point for both. 🔥 THE BOTTOM LINE This is not economic development. This is foreign ideological expansion, announced in the open. Florida is being pulled under the influence of: • The financial machinery of Saudi Arabia’s PIF • Saudi Arabia’s expansion strategy into Latin America • The OIC — the global Islamic political bloc guiding the ideological direction If Floridians don’t wake up now, Miami will become the Western command center of a foreign state-driven Islamic political empire — with the money, networks, and global leverage to reshape American culture, policy, and institutions far beyond anything voters ever approved.

Amy Mek

987,075 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨WAR ON IRAN: After Gaza, Israel returned to its ‘muscle memory of fighting against ALL of the Arabs’-Mohammed Baharoon🇦🇪 ‘Saudi Arabia was very close to a deal, or an understanding, with Israel. What made it fall apart was not only Israel’s attack on Gaza, but also the fact that Israel does not want to acknowledge or accept any future for the Palestinians as a state. We in the UAE, through the Abraham Accords, were trying to create a reality where this is not a threat to the Israelis. The Israelis maintained this for a long time, that a Palestinian state is a threat to Israel. And our view was that, in an integrated situation where all of the countries don’t fight each other over religion, and we are capable of being part of a wider network, then that will change the dynamics. Unfortunately it didn’t. We were close to that. The Gaza attack sort of dismantled this and brought Israel back to their muscle memory of fighting against all of the Arabs. And I think that’s where we’re seeing this new approach of Greater Israel.’ -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of Going Underground, as the UAE🇦🇪 deals with the regional crisis unleashed by the war on Iran. Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇 b'huth بحوث
3:24

🚨WAR ON IRAN: After Gaza, Israel returned to its ‘muscle memory of fighting against ALL of the Arabs’-Mohammed Baharoon🇦🇪 ‘Saudi Arabia was very close to a deal, or an understanding, with Israel. What made it fall apart was not only Israel’s attack on Gaza, but also the fact that Israel does not want to acknowledge or accept any future for the Palestinians as a state. We in the UAE, through the Abraham Accords, were trying to create a reality where this is not a threat to the Israelis. The Israelis maintained this for a long time, that a Palestinian state is a threat to Israel. And our view was that, in an integrated situation where all of the countries don’t fight each other over religion, and we are capable of being part of a wider network, then that will change the dynamics. Unfortunately it didn’t. We were close to that. The Gaza attack sort of dismantled this and brought Israel back to their muscle memory of fighting against all of the Arabs. And I think that’s where we’re seeing this new approach of Greater Israel.’ -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of Going Underground, as the UAE🇦🇪 deals with the regional crisis unleashed by the war on Iran. Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇 b'huth بحوث

Going Underground

55,173 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

● This video is not merely a passing message from a Yemeni youth, but a heartrending cry that encapsulates the tragedy of an entire generation. A young man leaves his homeland, scarred by wounds, not to seek a dignified life or a job opportunity, but to fight and die in a war in which he has no concern. This is not an individual story, but a direct result of politicians' failures, a blocked horizon, and the collapse of any meaning to life. ● For a despair to lead Yemeni youth to join Ukraine war, with all its horrors, to become a less cruel option than staying in the homeland—this is a direct indictment of all political forces, of everyone who leads the scene, of everyone preoccupied with conflicts and narrow calculations, leaving the Yemeni individual alone to face poverty, unemployment, and a futureless void. Yemen deserves better from its sons, and the blood of its youth is too sacred to be squandered in others' wars, while their homeland is held hostage to division and chaos. ● This message must be read with a living conscience. Politicians, across all their spectrums—and I am one of them—must fear God regarding Yemen and its people. They must realize that continued obstruction, vendettas, and prioritizing partisan, regional, sectarian, and factional interests only produce more migration, or enlistment in fronts of death, or a slide toward extremism, terrorism, and crime. ● In the face of this harsh reality, the persistence of fragmentation or wasting time on side conflicts is no longer acceptable. The time has come to unify the ranks, rally around our political leadership, and work earnestly and responsibly to restore the state and extend its sovereignty over its entire national territory, and to build an inclusive national project that restores to the youth a sense of belonging, gives them a reason to stay and defend their homeland, and restores to Yemen its natural right to life and stability. ● Yemen does not lack men, nor courage, nor sacrifice. What it lacks is a genuine national project, and political parties and forces that respect their people and see in the youth a force for building, not fuel for wars. Every day that passes without a solution, without a horizon, without hope, pushes another young man onto the path of loss... either in the sea of migration, or on a front that knows neither his name nor his cause. ● This message is not directed against any specific individual, but it is a moment of self-conscience before it becomes a reproach to others. If this moment does not awaken us, and does not drive us to unify the ranks and work earnestly to reclaim what remains of our homeland, and to seize this historic opportunity and the sincere, honorable brotherly stances from our brothers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦, then a day will come when the harsh question is posed to all: Why did you betray Yemen? And why did you leave its sons to seek death far from their homeland?
1:38

● This video is not merely a passing message from a Yemeni youth, but a heartrending cry that encapsulates the tragedy of an entire generation. A young man leaves his homeland, scarred by wounds, not to seek a dignified life or a job opportunity, but to fight and die in a war in which he has no concern. This is not an individual story, but a direct result of politicians' failures, a blocked horizon, and the collapse of any meaning to life. ● For a despair to lead Yemeni youth to join Ukraine war, with all its horrors, to become a less cruel option than staying in the homeland—this is a direct indictment of all political forces, of everyone who leads the scene, of everyone preoccupied with conflicts and narrow calculations, leaving the Yemeni individual alone to face poverty, unemployment, and a futureless void. Yemen deserves better from its sons, and the blood of its youth is too sacred to be squandered in others' wars, while their homeland is held hostage to division and chaos. ● This message must be read with a living conscience. Politicians, across all their spectrums—and I am one of them—must fear God regarding Yemen and its people. They must realize that continued obstruction, vendettas, and prioritizing partisan, regional, sectarian, and factional interests only produce more migration, or enlistment in fronts of death, or a slide toward extremism, terrorism, and crime. ● In the face of this harsh reality, the persistence of fragmentation or wasting time on side conflicts is no longer acceptable. The time has come to unify the ranks, rally around our political leadership, and work earnestly and responsibly to restore the state and extend its sovereignty over its entire national territory, and to build an inclusive national project that restores to the youth a sense of belonging, gives them a reason to stay and defend their homeland, and restores to Yemen its natural right to life and stability. ● Yemen does not lack men, nor courage, nor sacrifice. What it lacks is a genuine national project, and political parties and forces that respect their people and see in the youth a force for building, not fuel for wars. Every day that passes without a solution, without a horizon, without hope, pushes another young man onto the path of loss... either in the sea of migration, or on a front that knows neither his name nor his cause. ● This message is not directed against any specific individual, but it is a moment of self-conscience before it becomes a reproach to others. If this moment does not awaken us, and does not drive us to unify the ranks and work earnestly to reclaim what remains of our homeland, and to seize this historic opportunity and the sincere, honorable brotherly stances from our brothers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦, then a day will come when the harsh question is posed to all: Why did you betray Yemen? And why did you leave its sons to seek death far from their homeland?

معمر الإرياني

10,853 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇸🇦🇵🇸 Drop Site News listened closely as the foreign ministers of Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Norway, Spain, the EU, and Saudi Arabia laid out their positions on the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire at the Doha Forum. One thing that stood out: the only official pushing a hard line on urgent disarmament of the Palestinian resistance was the representative from the Saudi Foreign Ministry. That official, Dr. Manal Radwan, a Minister Plenipotentiary, warned there must be no “redefining” of what disarmament means under the UN Security Council–backed plan and dismissed debates over logistics, what she called the “who, what, when.” Her position directly clashed with Norway and Turkey, both of whom warned that forced disarmament up front is fundamentally unrealistic. Norway’s foreign minister said it is “very unlikely” there would ever be consensus for an international force to physically disarm Hamas against its will, stressing that any weapons process must be Palestinian-led and politically sequenced. He warned that if the “who, what, when” is not settled quickly — with governance institutions and a monitoring force put in place first — the ceasefire will collapse back into war and “total anarchy.” Turkey’s foreign minister was even more blunt: “We should not expect from the ISF work that has not been completed by the Israeli security forces.” He explicitly dismissed disarmament as the ISF’s first task, saying decommissioning of arms can realistically only occur after ISF establishes a security presence between the two forces, governance structures are restored in Gaza, aid begins to flow unrestricted, and there is some normalization of civilian life inside Gaza.
2:08

🇸🇦🇵🇸 Drop Site News listened closely as the foreign ministers of Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Norway, Spain, the EU, and Saudi Arabia laid out their positions on the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire at the Doha Forum. One thing that stood out: the only official pushing a hard line on urgent disarmament of the Palestinian resistance was the representative from the Saudi Foreign Ministry. That official, Dr. Manal Radwan, a Minister Plenipotentiary, warned there must be no “redefining” of what disarmament means under the UN Security Council–backed plan and dismissed debates over logistics, what she called the “who, what, when.” Her position directly clashed with Norway and Turkey, both of whom warned that forced disarmament up front is fundamentally unrealistic. Norway’s foreign minister said it is “very unlikely” there would ever be consensus for an international force to physically disarm Hamas against its will, stressing that any weapons process must be Palestinian-led and politically sequenced. He warned that if the “who, what, when” is not settled quickly — with governance institutions and a monitoring force put in place first — the ceasefire will collapse back into war and “total anarchy.” Turkey’s foreign minister was even more blunt: “We should not expect from the ISF work that has not been completed by the Israeli security forces.” He explicitly dismissed disarmament as the ISF’s first task, saying decommissioning of arms can realistically only occur after ISF establishes a security presence between the two forces, governance structures are restored in Gaza, aid begins to flow unrestricted, and there is some normalization of civilian life inside Gaza.

Drop Site

49,509 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Cost of Silence: How diaspora Neutrality Serves the Siege on Sudan In recent weeks, as the siege and starvation on El-Fashir, Kadugli and Diling reached unimaginable levels, a segment of the Sudanese diaspora — often self-identifying as liberal or progressive — has adopted a deeply troubling tone in their commentary on the sieges. Rather than confronting the political architecture behind the starvation, shelling, and forced displacement in these cities, they present these crises as unfortunate humanitarian episodes, detached from any actors, motives, or agendas. This depoliticization is not harmless. It blurs the line between victim and perpetrator, and ultimately serves the aggressor’s interests by evacuating any sense of responsibility or agency. At the heart of this failure is a deeper confusion — or perhaps a refusal — to internalize the reality that Sudan is under foreign-backed mercenary invasion. Cities are not starving on their own. Food is not running out naturally. Civilians are not caught in random crossfire. These are deliberate acts, imposed with intent, carried out by Abu Dhabi’s militias and their network of foreign fighters. They are funded, armed, and politically shielded by the UAE regime. To pretend otherwise is to erase both the suffering and the cause. The illusion of neutrality fully collapses when one confronts the facts on the ground. In El-Fashir, Abu Dhabi’s militias did not merely lay siege — they imported modern anti-aircraft systems, including radar-guided weapons, and deployed them around the city. To do so, they uprooted over half a million Sudanese civilians from the Zamzam IDP camp, turning it into a forward base and barracks for foreign mercenaries operating artillery, long-range drones, and air defense batteries. This was to block humanitarian airdrops by the Sudanese air force and ensure full starvation of the population. What part of this resembles a natural disaster? The paradox deepens when one considers the Colombian mercenaries operating in Darfur. What are they doing there? Are they part of a flood or a famine? No — they are the embodiment of a regional campaign, spearheaded by Abu Dhabi, to fragment Sudan, wipe out its people, and occupy its territory. To speak of this reality without naming it is not neutrality — it is narrative laundering. These UAE-made catastrophes could end tomorrow if the UAE-backed militias lifted their sieges and allowed aid to flow. The decision to obscure this fact protects the perpetrators, not the people. Many of these diaspora voices operate under the unnerving illusion that simply “raising awareness” or “keeping eyes on Sudan” is a meaningful end in itself — as if the world doesn’t already know. As if Sudanese pain needs to be re-performed daily for it to be valid. But what Sudan needs is not spectatorship. It needs clarity. It needs eyes that recognize that this is a war of subjugation and annihilation — and solidarity grounded in an acknowledgment of Sudanese agency and resistance. Not pity. Not posture. Not silence masquerading as balance. This complicity may not be conscious or intentional, but it stems from ingrained biases — political, psychological, or otherwise — that prioritize positioning over truth. In the process, these voices unwittingly echo the language of aggressors: replacing occupation with “conflict,” and calls for real solidarity with empty slogans like “keepEyesonSudan.” But Sudanese people are not asking for the world’s pity, nor do we seek to turn our suffering into spectacle. We want solidarity rooted in recognition of our right to resist, to exist, and to live freely — solidarity that confronts aggression, not one that looks on helplessly or seeks comfort in performative awareness.
0:48

The Cost of Silence: How diaspora Neutrality Serves the Siege on Sudan In recent weeks, as the siege and starvation on El-Fashir, Kadugli and Diling reached unimaginable levels, a segment of the Sudanese diaspora — often self-identifying as liberal or progressive — has adopted a deeply troubling tone in their commentary on the sieges. Rather than confronting the political architecture behind the starvation, shelling, and forced displacement in these cities, they present these crises as unfortunate humanitarian episodes, detached from any actors, motives, or agendas. This depoliticization is not harmless. It blurs the line between victim and perpetrator, and ultimately serves the aggressor’s interests by evacuating any sense of responsibility or agency. At the heart of this failure is a deeper confusion — or perhaps a refusal — to internalize the reality that Sudan is under foreign-backed mercenary invasion. Cities are not starving on their own. Food is not running out naturally. Civilians are not caught in random crossfire. These are deliberate acts, imposed with intent, carried out by Abu Dhabi’s militias and their network of foreign fighters. They are funded, armed, and politically shielded by the UAE regime. To pretend otherwise is to erase both the suffering and the cause. The illusion of neutrality fully collapses when one confronts the facts on the ground. In El-Fashir, Abu Dhabi’s militias did not merely lay siege — they imported modern anti-aircraft systems, including radar-guided weapons, and deployed them around the city. To do so, they uprooted over half a million Sudanese civilians from the Zamzam IDP camp, turning it into a forward base and barracks for foreign mercenaries operating artillery, long-range drones, and air defense batteries. This was to block humanitarian airdrops by the Sudanese air force and ensure full starvation of the population. What part of this resembles a natural disaster? The paradox deepens when one considers the Colombian mercenaries operating in Darfur. What are they doing there? Are they part of a flood or a famine? No — they are the embodiment of a regional campaign, spearheaded by Abu Dhabi, to fragment Sudan, wipe out its people, and occupy its territory. To speak of this reality without naming it is not neutrality — it is narrative laundering. These UAE-made catastrophes could end tomorrow if the UAE-backed militias lifted their sieges and allowed aid to flow. The decision to obscure this fact protects the perpetrators, not the people. Many of these diaspora voices operate under the unnerving illusion that simply “raising awareness” or “keeping eyes on Sudan” is a meaningful end in itself — as if the world doesn’t already know. As if Sudanese pain needs to be re-performed daily for it to be valid. But what Sudan needs is not spectatorship. It needs clarity. It needs eyes that recognize that this is a war of subjugation and annihilation — and solidarity grounded in an acknowledgment of Sudanese agency and resistance. Not pity. Not posture. Not silence masquerading as balance. This complicity may not be conscious or intentional, but it stems from ingrained biases — political, psychological, or otherwise — that prioritize positioning over truth. In the process, these voices unwittingly echo the language of aggressors: replacing occupation with “conflict,” and calls for real solidarity with empty slogans like “keepEyesonSudan.” But Sudanese people are not asking for the world’s pity, nor do we seek to turn our suffering into spectacle. We want solidarity rooted in recognition of our right to resist, to exist, and to live freely — solidarity that confronts aggression, not one that looks on helplessly or seeks comfort in performative awareness.

Ahmad Shomokh

36,877 просмотров • 1 год назад