这是中国对垃圾进行焚烧的详细说明。

得，又一项走在了造福人类前沿，这下又少了一批喷子，支黑集体S妈。

上推观察了这么些年，不管你怎么科普，2B们都是无脑喷，你只能看白痴一样看待他们。不信观察的评论区😂

发这玩意的人压根就不知道温度达到1200度要付出什么，还以为是炉子一样把燃料扔进去就能达到这温度。 说真的我挺像想笑，越是无知的人越是一边喊要相信科学，一边要求别人不能质疑。

既然这样，还不够烧，为什么上海前几年搞垃圾分类啊，还要向其它城市推广（虽然无疾而终了）

在中国，理论和实际有多少差距，我想绝大多数人都明白。宪法里还写着我们有言论出版结社自由呢。

中国垃圾焚烧技术和标准来自欧盟

说了更不可思议，居然现在垃圾不够用了。。。得抢垃圾烧。其次垃圾分类有必要，但不是必须了，刻意由居民去分类变得实际意义并不太大了。只需稍微分类，留给底层收废品的就业机会。其它可以焚烧解决。关建技术已超过欧美标准，环保已不是理论。

This technology was put into use in our eighteen small county towns in 2019. I really admire this technology. It can make full use of waste and turn it into power resources.

互fo

随便问一下AI就知道并没有什么新技术，视频里也没有说到最关键的垃圾分类部分，所以还是把能烧的就烧掉，至于有毒气体温室效益一概不论。烧垃圾发电的效率肯定不如烧煤，所谓垃圾不够烧纯粹是扯淡。

你扯这么多淡，证明了你的浅薄与浮躁。滚吧，你走在自己的思维的误区里而已。

过滤处理有毒气体是成本昂贵的部分。。。

焚烧处置中心项目越来越少了。

这不从新加坡学的吗？

🧐🧐🧐

原来是水管锅炉

现在建了太多垃圾焚烧发电站，加上经济发展停滞，垃圾不够垃圾烧，还把以前封存的垃圾山开挖来烧。

废气处理不花钱吗？能完全过滤吗？

From Garbage to Cancer: Why China Solves “Impossible Problems” Differently Than the West Today I read a report saying that China’s waste incineration capacity has already exceeded the amount of garbage generated daily. With 1,000+ waste-to-energy plants, garbage is no longer a chronic crisis—it’s a fully absorbed, routine input, even generating electricity and economic value. That immediately made me think about cancer. Not because garbage equals cancer—but because both are problems that occur every single day, at massive scale, and cannot be postponed. In the West, waste is still largely handled by landfill: store it, delay it, spread the risk across time and space. In China, waste is handled by incineration: terminate it, confine it, make the process repeatable and predictable. This is not about ideology. It’s about engineering throughput. The same governance logic applies to medicine. Modern oncology often relies on one-time, high-stakes interventions with cumulative toxicity and escalating complexity. Powerful, yes—but difficult to repeat, difficult to control at scale. By contrast, some systems are designed not to be “stronger,” but to be engineerable: self-limiting reactions, localized effects, no system-wide accumulation, fast feedback, and the ability to repeat interventions without increasing risk. That difference—termination vs postponement, engineering vs heroics—is the real contrast between China and the West. China may sacrifice procedural freedom, but when it comes to absorbing unavoidable, large-scale problems, it prioritizes: • predictability • repeatability • system stability Garbage stopped being a crisis when it became infrastructure. Cancer will only stop being a crisis when treatment becomes the same. This article is not about politics, and not about selling any therapy. It’s about why some systems can turn “impossible problems” into routine processes—and others cannot. Read the full essay here: 👉

@grok 总结视频内容，并核实真实性

二恶英 了解一下

有机会弄几个大殖子扔进去体验中国科技

@HuoQubot

@AceAlbert2022 😃😃😃😃