Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

#๐€๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ž๐ž๐Ÿ๐๐จ๐…๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ซ: ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ 2025 Future Games alum and recent Miami Hurricanes Baseball commit Matthew Gorman sits down to talk about his recruitment, offseason development, and Papillion- LaVista South Titan Baseball's season ahead. ๐ŸŸข ๐Ÿ“บ Prep Baseball | Matthew Gorman

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

๐๐ˆ๐“๐‚๐‡๐„๐‘ ๐’๐๐Ž๐“๐‹๐ˆ๐†๐‡๐“ ๐š™๐š›๐šŽ๐šœ๐šŽ๐š—๐š๐šŽ๐š ๐š‹๐šข True Pitch Mounds Saydelโ€™s Brady Hicks (2027, Prep Baseball Uncommitted) already has an impressive pedigree. The now six-foot-five right-hander has already experienced the Junior Future Games (2023) and Super Sophomore Games (2024), and if all goes well this spring, he should be in consideration for this yearโ€™s Future Games team. Ranked 3rd in the state and 192nd nationally, Hicks has a frame that oozes projection with a quick, compact arm stroke into a three-quarter slot. He hides the ball well and has the arm speed that allows his fastball to get on hitters quickly. Some of his heaters run arm-side more than others, and the ones that do give right-handed hitters issues. The fastball has been up to 88.8 MPH on Trackman, and we saw that velocity upheld in-game during the fall tournament circuit. Hicksโ€™ low-80s slider is a swing-and-miss weapon with late movement, and the two pitches are a strong foundation. This past summer Hicks paced all freshman arms with 95 strikeouts (24th among all pitchers) in 65.1 innings pitched. The 95 strikeouts from a freshman pitcher was the most since Blaine Harpenauโ€™s 101 total in the 2017-2018 season. Overall, Hicks made 11 starts for the Eagles and went 6-2 with a 1.39 ERA and a .177 batting average allowed. Big things are ahead for this young arm. More on Brady โคต๏ธ

Prep Baseball Iowa

11,934 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

LEASEHOLDERS KEEP BEING LOOTED UNDER The Labour Party๐Ÿฅ€ At PMQs today, for the second week running, Keir Starmer was quizzed about the Draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill he blocked before Christmas, breaking his governmentโ€™s own deadline to publish in the second half of 2025. The Zack Polanski effect. But a Draft Bill being published isnโ€™t victory. We need assurances that the legislation will be prioritised onto the statute books and commenced IN FULL with the 2024 Act, which sits rusting, well ahead of the next general election. Weโ€™ll be watching closely. What will this The Labour Party government actually do to END leasehold, as the manifesto promised, for those of us already trapped? We need bold structural change to abolish leaseholding. Minor tweaks or regulating managing agents will not cut it. Nor will weird ECHR legalism. Slash money-for-nothing ground rents to peppercorn, or zero. Your party pushed for this in opposition. Now, with a massive parliamentary majority, you can deliver it for the working people you claim to represent. Sweep away the barriers to freehold acquisition to enable a mass shift to commonhold. The silence on the enfranchisement consultation, which was meant to take place last summer to make it cheaper and easier for leaseholders to extend leases and buy out the freeholds but did not happen, is very worrying. This is a core part of the 2024 Act. Matthew Pennycook MP may dismiss us as โ€œthe usual naysayersโ€, but we will not back down or be silenced. As he once said of the last government: โ€œtoo long to waitโ€.

Free Leaseholders

21,618 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

๐Ÿ‘€โ€These 2 Shall Meet Again ๐Ÿ”œ โ€œ Hoover Bucs Part 2: Hoover Bucs The Biggest Storylines in the BHAM coverage area is easyโ€ฆ..starting at the top with 7๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ…ฐ๏ธโ€ฆ.. 2 Teamsโ€ฆโ€ฆThe Nation is Watching๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Hoover ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ & โš”๏ธThompsonโ€ฆ.teams that have a ton of history and now the national spotlight backed with the games future stars of tomorrow as wellโ€ฆ. โž–โž–โž–โž–7๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ…ฐ๏ธโž–โž–โž–โž– Stories Iโ€™m Following ๐Ÿ“ Hoover Bucs Football - Year 1 technically 2 for HC Coach English โ€ฆ.The Bucs came just one game short of the state title game last seasonโ€ฆ.Big season opener vs. IMG August 21st - Jonah "JP" Winston : Arguably the most electrifying talent at his position & commitment date soon is expected from the 4โญ๏ธATH whoโ€™s a highly coveted prospect in Alabamaโ€ฆ.๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ”œ - Tyson(TBJ) BACON ๐Ÿฅ“ : Recent Miami Hurricanes Football commit & One of the Top โ€˜26 DL in the country ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ will be looking to be a force in his senior campaign for the Bucs. - Jackson Lassiter : Spotted the talented DB earlier this spring at Rivals (Dothan). Unique talent that brings energy & his technique bring awareness to hisโ€ฆ.โ€™26 prospects on the riseโ€ฆ.๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ”œ - Talented QB Room ๐ŸŽฏ: The Bucs seem to have a solid group of QBs from โ€˜26- โ€˜28 that will have a bright future at the positionโ€ฆ..โ€™27 Kaleb โ€œYoungjuiceโ€ Freeman & โ€˜28 RaKaveon "Gold" Goldsmith are 2 I know have a ton of upside - The Gift of Gabbi: On a previous visit at Hoover spring practice, I encountered a very passionate interpreter who was in her element helping a student-athlete understand his assignmentโ€ฆ..Iโ€™m Looking forward to the content from the insight around her profession helping the sport from her perspective. - First Game: August 21st vs. IMG (Florida) ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธBucs Are Deep With Talent ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ A Few Bucs You Should Know Tyson(TBJ) BACON ๐Ÿฅ“ CJ Cowley 2027 RB Jonah "JP" Winston Jackson Lassiter Jeremiah Tabb Trey Sanders #6 RaKaveon "Gold" Goldsmith Jordon ward Kaleb โ€œYoungjuiceโ€ Freeman Hunter Purdue DJ Waluyn 2027 Lincoln Anderson 4.5โญ๏ธ Jordan Tyler Williams Christian Harris James Betres Caleb โ€œ๐Ÿชโ€ Cook James Bryant 4.5โญ๏ธK/P Jude Williams #AlabamaTop4 (๐Ÿ“ธ TripleThreatPhoto )

Hall-Tech Sports

10,156 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 11 Monaten

I Am a J6er It happened after J6 I don't remember when I first thought about killing myself. Perhaps when i received the dear John email my Ex sent, asking for a divorce while I was locked up, or when my father called me a fvcking insurrectionist. Maybe the business failing or my face all over the headlines. Almost every J6er has thought of this escape. I have learned that if someone expresses suicidal thoughts, you have to ask them if they had a plan. My only plan was to try to get out of bed, pray, get some exercise, and go to work. I was lucky i found a job and kept my faith. Some couldn't make it. Like Matthew Perna. I heard of his story from his Aunt Geri Perna And her consostent message might have saved my life. The video is what cost himnhis. Every J6er carries a story of persecution, the likes of which we haven't seen since slavery. The grief and mental anguish rose and fell as we wrestled toward acceptance of where we were. Denial. Anger. Bargaining. Depression. Acceptance. Some moved through these stages quickly. Others remained trapped and are still to this day. We grieved the lives we lost, the country we thought was real, the families, jobs, and friends who walked away. Those who couldn't make it. Rest in Peace โ€” Matthew Perna Jord Meachum Mark Aungst Christopher Stanton Matthew Weble Most of us slid back and forth, and still do, trudging toward acceptance. And yesโ€ฆ we had all thought about it. Ending it all. J6er Grief. I tried to untangle the grieving process of my own J6 journey. It was a tangled web of intertwined emotions โ€” explosions of pain where one stage bled into the next and I could no longer tell where one ended and another began. In August of 2021 I wrote this to mark where I stood: Denial: March to November 2020 Anger: November 2020 to January 2021 Depression & Bargaining: January 2021 onward I did not yet know what true acceptance would look like. Would it mean becoming a doormat? Or would it mean finally learning to dissent and fight from a place of peace? I was still working on it. The multi-headed hydra of calamity hit all at once: The trauma of my arrest. The destruction of my job and finances. Family and friends walking away. My life being ripped apart forever. And the divorce. I went from a baseball dad with a successful real estate business, living on a lake with my familyโ€ฆ to an old man, lyingnlow, selling homes, keeping exoenses low renting out rooms, and living in the basement of a rental home. If i get pinched again i can survive. And I am one of the lucky ones. I cried the Tuesday before Thanksgiving a few years ago. In a support group I attended, I shared how heartbroken I was that I would not be with my family for the holidays for the first time in nearly twenty years. For a few seconds I broke down in a room full of men. My sobs and silent tears echoed in that still church basement. I was sadder than I sometimes allowed myself to feelโ€ฆ but I came to believe I was healing. My J6 persecution took so much from me that I could never be made whole. Only by Godโ€™s divine grace was I still standing. Many arent. I had wondered: If they had simply given me the $50 ticket every other liberal illegal picketing protester received โ€” before J6 and after โ€” would she have stayed? If I had spent years in prison instead of 30 days, would absence have made the heart grow fonder? Or was the outcome already written? I became okay. The holidays were hard. I understood that firsthand. Many suffered far worse than me. This, too, passed. I had faith. Fear and faith cannot live in the same house. I grieved deeply. And in that grieving, I found acceptance. By Godโ€™s grace, the darkness lifted. The grief shaped me but did not define me. I rose from the ashes โ€” scarred, but standing. There is still pain, but there is also peace. There is still loss, but there is also love. The best days are not behind us. They are still ahead. Acceptance God Bless the J6ers.

John M. Cameron

53,500 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 26 Tagen

Knapp: "At [Matthew Brown's] home, there was a break in. They took his grandfather's ashes, his urn, and dumped it out by the garbage." (REALLY Messed Up. So when you say, "Why can't these guys just get a regular job? It's not that simple.) Knapp: Someone followed Dylan Borland, myself and Corbell when we were in DC. ~ Knapp: "There are people, I mean, I'm in touch with them on a regular basis, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell as well. Guys who would like to tell a story, but are scared, legitimately scared. These three who came forward, the three service members who testified, it's brave. It's a daunting thing to appear before Congress, swear an oath. The whole world is watching, you don't know what you're going to be asked, TV cameras from all over media, all over the world. It's a daunting thing. It takes bravery to come forward, especially because there is a strong possibility that you will pay for coming forward and telling this story. And a couple of them already have. "We didn't hear the full story from Dylan Borland That will be coming out, though, soon. There's some limits on what he can legally say. He'd like to say more, but he worries that he's going to be targeted for prosecution or something worse. Matthew is the guy who was sitting behind us at the hearing. He was also offered as a possible witness, and maybe will be a witness and testify in a future hearing. He's the guy who came up with the Immaculate Constellation documents a couple of months ago that Jeremy and I put out on our podcast. [Brown] described to us extra-legal things that happened to him and other witnesses who want to come forward as whistleblowers. they get break-ins in their homes. There are a lot of games, their phones are tapped. At his home, there was a break in. They they got IDs and stuff out of his wallet and his wife's wallet and put them across the couch and left them there. They took his grandfather's ashes, his urn, and dumped it out by the garbage. I mean, it's a message. It's an intimidation message. "David Grusch has had those kind of things. As far back as Bob Lazar. They would break into his house, move things around, write things on the on the chalkboard, where he...in his laboratory, and just mess with them. Call and make threats. All kinds of extra-legal things that I don't think even a Whistleblower Protection Act could change. Because whoever is doing this stuff, whoever is trying to shut these people up, threatening their lives, it's working outside the legal system. It's already illegal. So I don't know that that that would stop. But at least Congress would be making a statement that we value that kind of testimony. We want to protect you. Come on in, we'd like to hear more of it. It's a good step in the right direction, I think. "And somebody like Dylan, who has quite a story to tell, beyond what he could tell there. Dylan has been through the wringer. He's been through the ICIG, he has been to AARO. He's been in these closed-door SCIF-type meetings where he reveals this stuff, and he's worried they're coming after him. He has a good reason to be worried. "I'll tell you a story that didn't come out of that hearing. Jeremy has been talking to Dylan longer than I have, but I've been talking to him for a couple of years. We went back to see him after the last hearing, the previous hearing in 2023, we went to go meet with Dylan, And we went to a secret location. We didn't tell anybody where it was going to be. We met him in a public park south of Washington, DC, not even in the DC area, and we're going to meet him in this park early in the morning. We pull in this park. Dylan's the only person there, but there's a vehicle. There's a big, black jeep, blacked-out window, sitting there. And I just looking at it and I go, you know, 'I don't feel comfortable sitting here. This bothers me. Let's go somewhere else.' "We drove about 15 miles away. We found a little eatery that we're going to have a bite at. We parked two blocks around the corner from that restaurant, and then we went in and had a talk, in what we thought was a secure place. We come out an hour and a half later, there's that same damn vehicle parked right up against our bumper of our car. It was making it very obvious to us that, yeah, you're being followed, how do you like it? "People like Dylan Borland, they're trying to navigate this as carefully as they can. They've been threatened, they've been intimidated, they've been warned. You better be careful. They've shared what they can in SCIFs and in certain situations, but there's a lot more they'd like to say. I don't blame them for being careful. Now, why Hal Puthoff could then say that (the U.S. has received at least ten craft of unknown origin) on Joe Rogan? It just might be the power of Rogan to overcome all resistance, I guess. But he did. You know, I know that there are people like those guys, deep insiders, who spent their whole careers working on this stuff, who would like to say things. Would like to say more."

Joe Murgia

19,729 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

BREAKING NEWS ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ Per newly-released John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial transcripts (May 24, 2024), undercover ATF Agent Brian Higgins testified or provided information to the US DOJ in Boston under a grant of immunity at some point prior to May of 2024 regarding John's death. Source, pages 127-128 (of 5481) here - Higgins, also according to new documents, was in some kind of bisexual relationship with both John and Karen in the weeks before John's death (that, for some reason, involved "gay men.") Read those text messages here - Furthermore, Higgins was inside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on the night/early morning of January 28th into January 29th of 2022 that John was killed and left to die from a brain hemorrhage and hypothermia on a lawn during a blizzard. In recent weeks, it was also revealed that the state police unit who investigated Karen Read (and who may also have been involved in the coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder by Stoughton police officer, and affiliate of Epstein-linked Stoughton Deputy Chief Robert Devine, Matthew Farwell) were the subject of an intense federal grand jury investigation related to the "performance of the Massachusetts state police" between, at the very least, the summer of 2024 and the early spring of 2024. Read more about the document, from the Brian Walshe, confirming that federal probe of the "performance of the state police" here- That grand jury (which, per the federal information filed against leaker Jessica Leslie, was empaneled by Justice Indra Talwani on May 26, 2022) culminated in a shocking six and a half hour interview of infamous former state trooper Michael Proctor (who worked under Brian Tully at the Norfolk District Attorney's State Police SPDU unit). According to new Internal Affairs documents released about Tully, after Proctor's six hour grilling by then US Attorney For The District Of Massachusetts Josh Levy, Tully and his right-hand man John Fanning (the trooper who wrote the 2021 state police report clearing Farwell for Birchmore's murder initially, prior to federal charges coming down for Farwell in August of 2024) visited Proctor's home and were desperate for information about that federal probe. Read that IA report here - Interestingly, in December of 2023, Brian Tully also used his official position as a state police officer to ask Lindsey Gaetani if she knew information about the "target of the federal probe." When Lindsey (a witness in the orbit of the TurtleBoy and Karen Read cases) told Tully that Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey was the target of the probe, Tully reacted with shock. Interestingly, Tully would have had access to a November 28, 2023, text messages (sent at 6:42PM ET exactly) from TurtleBoy to Lindsey which indicated that Josh Levy wanted to set an obstruction trap for Read trial witness Jen McCabe (who knows Tully personally and speaks to him directly) by comparing the discovery turned over to Karen Read's legal team with records obtained by the DOJ from McCabe's cellphone between February and May of 2022. Here's the transcript of an interview where Lindsey described that moment with Tully; **Grant Smith-Ellis:** Yeah, and Lindsey, let me ask you about something because I kind of might have previewed it before you came on, but I'm very interested to hear you talk about it. Brian Tully alludes in paragraph 79 of the Karen Read search warrant affidavit to a piece of information you told him related to like something about Josh Levy or something. Did Brian Tullyโ€”in December of 2023, while the Birchmore investigation was open (we know that now in hindsight)โ€”did he ask you who the targets of the federal probe were? And what did you tell him, and how did he respond? **Lindsey Gaetani:** Yeah, and I said, yeahโ€”from the conversations I had with Aidan, it was implied or alluded toโ€”from either his conversations with Karen or whateverโ€”that the target was Michael Morrissey. And I remember this moment like as if it were yesterday: Tully, at the same exact time as Nelsonโ€”they both looked at each other like their heads turned sideways. They both looked at each other, made eye contact, and kind of smirked. And then they looked back at me and continued the questioning. But it was just likeโ€”I was frozen in that moment, and I was likeโ€”what was that smirk about? Like, was that a smirk of relief? Like, โ€œWe are not the targetโ€? Or was that a smirk of like, โ€œOh goodโ€”like, this is what we thoughtโ€? Like, I don't know what that was. I don'tโ€”I didn't know how to interpret it. I just know what I saw, you know? Source - In any event, on March 7th of 2024, after Tully found out that the DOJ had the contents of Michael proctor's cellphone (showing Proctor used horrifying language towards Karen Read), Tully was then forced to write up a disciplinary report on Proctor. However, before Tully could do so, Tully was forced to sign an NDA with the DOJ (middlewomaned by Norfolk ADA Laura McLaughlin) whereupon Tully was not allowed to see or hold the records from proctor's cellphone. Instead, Tully had to enter a room with McLaughlin and McLaughlin was not permitted (by the DOJ) to allow Tully to see or touch the documents. She read them, in part, to Tully and then he left the room. Furthermore, it is of note that, in July of 2025 (after Karen's second trial resulted in her acquittal for John's death and a guilty verdict on OUI) Michael Proctor, through counsel, told a lawyer in a number of other cases that Proctor investigated (including Myles King and Brian Walshe) that Proctor did not have any phone records to turn over to those defendants because his "old phone was destroyed in November of 2024" and "his new phone auto deletes itself every 30 days." Just a few months later, however, in late August of 2025, "someone" turned over 13 years of Proctor's phone records (including records that showed Proctor "sharing an SA victims name" with third parties, "sharing intimate images" with third parties and, also, potentially using racial slurs against defendants in cases Proctor investigated. Read more background about that timeline and Proctor's phone records here - In light of that information showing up in the Norfolk DA's possession, somehow, and then being turned over to multiple criminal defendants, Proctor then dropped his long-standing appeal of his discharge from the state police and retreated from public life entirely (as did almost all of his friends and allies connected to the Read investigation, many of whom were transferred demoted or involved in strange public scandals wherein the Boston Police Commissioner called them into his office and then lied to the media about it). As a result, it may well be that Brian Higgins is, or was, cooperating as a federal witness against some of the members of the state police unit who were involved in the investigation of John O'Keefe's death (and potentially he coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder). My name is Grant Smith-Ellis and I wrote all of that from memory.

Grant Smith Ellis

50,303 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 5 Monaten

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officerโ€”well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officerโ€”Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022โ€”not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higginsโ€”then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She workedโ€”let me make sure I get this right nowโ€”she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higginsโ€”or around there, maybe a little laterโ€”go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Thenโ€”and we're going to find outโ€”she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commissionโ€”or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminderโ€”this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doingโ€”which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months laterโ€”I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it wasโ€”yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, whichโ€”although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment onโ€”even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger pictureโ€”the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's notโ€”it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that wayโ€”that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statementโ€”although I'm sure you didโ€”he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, noโ€”that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she didโ€”not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassingโ€”that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's responseโ€”that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thingโ€”somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledgeโ€”he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read caseโ€”Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is comingโ€”to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state policeโ€”so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towelโ€”do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,006 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

COULD JENRICKโ€™S LEAP TO REFORM UK REIGNITE LEASEHOLDER LIBERATION? ๐Ÿ“ข Lots of talk at the Reform UK Robert Jenrick presser about an โ€œinflexion pointโ€ for British politics. Wait for it โ€ฆ thereโ€™s a leasehold abolition angle. Before defecting yesterday, Robert Jenrick was one of a tiny handful of Conservative parliamentarians who publicly pressured the Rishi Sunak government to go further on freeing leaseholders. Writing in the Telegraph, he called leasehold a symbol of โ€œrip-off Britainโ€, urged the abolition of forfeiture, a gangster-like device that forces leaseholders to comply with financial demands under threat of having their home seized without compensation over arrears as small as ยฃ350, and called for a sunset clause on leasehold. โ€œToday, leasehold stands not as a curiously British anomaly, but as an affront to the distinctly British dream of owning a home and the peace of mind that comes with ownership, rather than the insecurity of renting โ€ฆ a symbol of rip-off Britain, where hidden bills lurk around every corner, and of the growth of crony capitalism, where rent-seekers milk consumers despite adding no value.โ€ We also understand that when the general election was called, Jenrick was one of the very few Conservatives who pressed Number 10 to reverse course and rescue the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill in the wash-up after Sunak and his aides had dropped it. That became the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, which now sits rusting under this The Labour Party government, despite a promise in the July 2024 Kingโ€™s Speech to โ€œact quicklyโ€ to bring its provisions into effect. Some leaseholders criticise his time in office, particularly for giving freeholders a financial windfall under the two-storey permitted development right. This move caused the cost of collective enfranchisement to soar for affected blocks. His handling of the post-Grenfell building safety crisis was also controversial, as it initially risked imposing loans on cladding victims. On the latter, Jenrick secured a ยฃ1 billion government fund for remediation in May 2020, agreed with the Treasury and Sunak, then chancellor, and later succeeded in increasing it to ยฃ5 billion in February 2021. As his former colleague Stephen Greenhalgh said in 2023, after leaving government: โ€œWe forget that Robert Jenrick actually got a lot of money out of the Treasury. He went back and, like Oliver Twist, got more.โ€ Yesterday, Jenrick admitted he made mistakes in government and said, like much of the country, he has been on a journey, realising the uniparty has failed Britain. After leaving the Sunak administration for the backbenches, he recalled how, as Housing Secretary, he resisted pressure from the murky retirement property sector, which had tried to preserve the exemption from a ban on ground rents for new builds that his predecessor had allowed. He ultimately abolished the exemption. โ€œIts lobbyists approached Members of Parliament and my Department and threatened judicial review of our proceedings,โ€ he said. โ€œI considered it an unfair practice, targeted at the most elderly and vulnerable in our society. Why not have a fairer and transparent system where an elderly person knows exactly what they are paying?โ€ He was responsible for the ban on ground rents in new leases under the 2022 Act, which abolished the retirement property exemption and aimed to pave the way for reviving commonhold. In a January 2021 statement, Jenrick secured government commitments to abolish marriage value, advance enfranchisement reform, and revive commonhold, launching a Commonhold Council to prepare the market and consumers ahead of the second-generation tenureโ€™s rollout. Beyond ending ground rents for new builds, in January 2021 Jenrick secured a commitment from Boris Johnson for a second legislative package to free leaseholders. But after he left the Housing Secretary role, the 2022 Queenโ€™s Speech saw this second Bill shelved, reportedly under pressure from the Treasury, Johnsonโ€™s own aides, and lobbyists for Big Freehold. The plan was eventually delivered by the Sunak government with the 2024 Act, though it incorporated only a handful of the 2020 Law Commission recommendations that Jenrick had overseen. While Labour has been dragging its feet in power, the Conservative Party has failed to defend the 2024 Act or hold the government to account on a totemic pro-homeownership policy that will reduce the cost of living and expand the property-owning democracy. After the general election, Jenrick was probably the most vocal Conservative MP on leasehold, pressing on Lord Hermerโ€™s strange ECHR legalism thwarting leaseholder liberation, even though he was not the housing spokesperson. Leaseholders have seen no leadership from Conservative Shadow Housing Secretary James Cleverly๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง. On Monday, when Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook was under pressure, Cleverlyโ€™s colleague David Simmonds CBE, Conservative MP delivered a disastrous performance in Parliament, asking about local government reorganisation during the leasehold and commonhold debate. Pennycook couldnโ€™t believe his luck. Jenrick is now joining Reform UK, a party that promised cheaper lease extensions and freehold purchase in its last election manifesto. Richard Tice MP ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง, Reform deputy leader and MP for Boston and Skegness, rightly attacked the Sunak administration for backing down on slashing money-for-nothing ground rents to peppercorn or zero financial value, as promised in the 2019 Conservative manifesto. Tice also personally pushed for this agenda to be included in the Reform manifesto after Nigel Farage MP succeeded him as leader. At a March 2021 press conference, when proposing a โ€œpolluter paysโ€ approach to resolving the cladding scandal with a guarantee that financial liability would not fall on leaseholders, in contrast to the Tory policy at the time, Tice said: โ€œWith my three decades of experience, I know what some of those landlords are like, and very often they havenโ€™t got the leaseholdersโ€™ interests at heart.โ€ It will be interesting to see whether both men continue to push for leaseholder liberation. The 5.3 million households alienated by Labourโ€™s foot-dragging and repeated excuses on ending leasehold are looking to the party at the top of the polls to challenge the government and provide support as we approach crucial local elections. The political economy around housing is changing fast. The New Right are becoming wary of the financialisation of a prime social need. As Donald J. Trump and JD Vance have observed: โ€œPeople live in homes, not corporations.โ€

Free Leaseholders

12,317 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

And, right on cue, the Kate Peter-aligned trolls come out of the woodwork to use Lindsey Gaetani as a distraction in order to protect Michael Proctor, Brian Tully and Jen McCabe. Kate only has a few dangerous Discord operatives left, and even Jason Broyles seems to be skittish. TRANSCRIPT: This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's notโ€”I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a hugeโ€”it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn'tโ€”when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.

Grant Smith Ellis

14,358 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 8 Monaten