Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ด ๐๐‘๐„๐€๐Š๐ˆ๐๐†: ๐€๐‘๐’๐„๐๐€๐‹ ๐–๐€๐๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„ "๐‹๐„๐…๐“-๐…๐Ž๐Ž๐“๐„๐ƒ ๐‘๐€๐Œ๐Ž๐’"! ๐•๐ˆฬ๐‚๐“๐Ž๐‘ ๐•๐€๐‹๐ƒ๐„๐๐„๐ฬƒ๐€๐’! ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ’Ž Valdepeรฑas(25/26), 1.88m Left-Footed CB 34km/h Top Speed He kept a clean sheet in 42% of his matches๐Ÿฅถ Arteta likes Him๐Ÿ‘€

102,965 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

BOMBSHELL.๐Ÿšจ Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-year-old gunman who attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, was spotted on the roof 26 minutes before the shooting occurred. The FBI has confirmed that Crooks was seen by law enforcement members from the Allegheny County Police Department on the roof of a building with a clear sightline to the former president. Despite being alerted to his presence, authorities failed to confront him, allowing him to remain hidden for nearly 30 minutes before he opened fire on Trump and the crowd. The shocking new allegations have raised questions about how Crooks was able to evade detection and carry out the attack, which left Trump wounded and a member of the crowd dead. A sniper even took a picture of the suspect with a rangefinder and radioed to the command post before the Trump assassination attempt, CBS reports. Crooks was on local police and Secret Service's radar for nearly a half hour before the shooting attempt, but he kept "disappearing" before he climbed on the roof. "Crooks disappeared again and then came back a THIRD time with a backpack," CBS reported. "The snipers called in with information that he had a backpack and said he was walking towards the back of the building." It gets crazier. The New York Post reports local police were INSIDE the building that Thomas Crooks climbed on top of. The building was carved out of the Secret Service security perimeter and delegated to local police despite it being a "well-known high priority vulnerability.โ€ Before the shooting, a police officer actually confronted Crooks, who had a rifle. The police officer scrambled back down the ladder, allowing the shooter to fire at least five rounds at the former president. No one had warned Trump.

Kyle Becker

3,803,452 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]๐Ÿ“ Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. โ–  A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. โ–  Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. โ–  His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the teamโ€™s attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: โ–  Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: โ–  In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. โ–  As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. โ–  As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes โ–  Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. โ–  Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure โ–  High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefsโ€™ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: โ–  Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayoโ€™s speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. โ–  High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs donโ€™t rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayoโ€™s instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. โ–  Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefsโ€™ attacking efficiency. Mayoโ€™s game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value โ–  Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. โ–  Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. โ–  Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! ๐Ÿ“

El Capitanoโšช

87,172 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 10 ay รถnce

๐ŸšจSHOCKING: Charlie Kirk's Veins POP Like He Was Electrocuted โ€“ Hidden Trigger Man Exposed?! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ โ€“ ZOOMED & SLOWED DOWN Video Reveal Shocking NEW Leads! โšก I just went back and dissected the raw footage of Charlie Kirk's assassination at UVU โ€“ zoomed in 500x, slowed to 0.25x speed โ€“ and what I uncovered will blow your mind. This isn't a rifle shot from Tyler Robinson... it looks like ELECTROCUTION in combination with an EXPLODING MIC! Here's what stuck out like a sore thumb: ๐Ÿ”ดVeins Popping Like Electrocution Victim: Watch Charlie's right arm the instant he's hit โ€“ his veins bulge out dramatically, exactly like what happens in electrocution cases. No way a bullet does that; it's classic high-voltage response! ๐Ÿ”ดRick Cutler (Palm Gun Guy) Triggers It?: Perfectly in sync in when Charlie's body tenses up! Rick reaches up to his left sleeve, fiddles with something hidden โ€“ and BAM, Charlie's body tenses up, arms jerk involuntarily upward perfectly syncs to Rick's arm movement and him triggering something under his left sleeve. Is this the remote detonation? Creepy grin on Rick before, during, and after... what's he hiding? ๐Ÿ”ดMysterious Black Object on Shirt: For just ONE FRAME, a black shard appears on Charlie's shirt near the wound. Shrapnel from ABS plastic in the mic? Black tempered glass from a device? Or the mic itself exploding? Gone in a flash, but captured here! But wait, digging deeper, more leads emerged that scream COVER-UP: ๐Ÿ”˜No Blood or Exit Wound from Behind: Footage from rear angle shows ZERO blood spray or visible injury on entry โ€“ impossible for a .30-06 round, but fits an internal explosion or shock. ๐Ÿ”˜Neck Movement Matches Explosion: Frame-by-frame, Charlie's neck snaps in a way that aligns with a shape charge in the mic battery detonating, propelling a circuit board shard that blocks then gushes blood. This backs Baron Coleman's electrocution theory HARD โ€“ reminiscent of Israel's pager bombs, remotely triggered by a bodyguard (looking at you, Rick!). Tyler's a patsy; official story's crumbling with no bullet, no autopsy, tampered scene. What do YOU think? Black shard a mic fragment? Cutler the trigger man? Drop your takes in comments! ๐Ÿ‘‡ Tag Candace Owens โ€“ she called the mic setup WEIRD! RT to expose this!

Project Constitution

32,678 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce

โšก๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บNew full length interview from Andrey Gregoriev callsign "Tuta", with even more crazy details, particularly about the second counterattack assault which came after Andrey had already eliminated the first Ukrainian in the now-famous death match: It's a total hell that Andrei went through. There's no movie like this. It turns out that the hand-to-hand fight was only the beginning of a heavy battle. Andrei thought he had killed the AFU soldier with a line from his house. He went out and came face to face with him. He was scared - they fell to the ground, fighting to the death. At the very beginning of the melee he cut his hand with his own knife. But he defeated the enemy, silently and as fast as he could - the territory was under the AFU, there would be no help for sure - the Russian units were 6 km away. He said goodbye to the dying Khokhl, threw him a grenade and then finished him off with a shot: โ€œhe was mumbling somethingโ€. He went down to the basement of the house - examined his wounds, rewrapped himself. The vest was torn at the straps, the helmet didn't fit over his head - his right ear was swollen. I got up and took the radio from the AFU soldier. On the other side they were preparing a counterattack of 6 storm troopers. The enemy knew and saw the fight - they even argued on the air whether he was a Tuvinian or a Yakut. Six of them came, actively started pelting him with grenades, calling whether he was alive or not. Andrei was silent. The AFU men argued who would go to check him - one of them went, ours put him down at once. Again grenades and smoke grenades to smoke him out. Andrei soaked his hat in water and breathed like that. Then they argued again and sent one to check him - he put him in 300, he shouted for help. They ran out of grenades and decided to burn Andrei - they threw a โ€œlighterโ€ and then decided that he was dead. It was already evening around 22 hours. At 7 a.m. another group of the enemy came... 00: 33 Details of the combat exit: a dead comrade, a drone attack and the first injuries 02: 07 Why did Vsushnik offer "Tute" to surrender 03: 28 Exclusive fight details 04: 48 How the enemy almost took possession of the knife "Tuta" 05: 20 In such battles, only one survives 05: 40 Why yakut fought without a sound 06: 37 The last seconds of the life of an AFU militant 07: 24 VSUshnik's walkie-talkie helped "Tuta" to find out about the counterattack of the APU and buy time 08: 33 How the enemies realized that they were dealing with Yakut 08: 48 The militants tried to throw grenades at "Tutu" and bring them to talk 09: 15 "Tuta" ambushed enemy intelligence 10: 03 How water saved the hero from gas 10: 51 Why Grigoriev didn't kill the three hundredth 12: 03 Exploding phone, surviving watch and drones โ€“ how "Tuta" managed to jump out of the trap while the militants went for an RPG 14: 18 Yakut hand-to-hand combatant on how he put the flag of the Russian Federation at the headquarters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine 14: 50 What the fighter managed to do in 6 days in the enemy's territory 15: 34 "I should have done it myself" โ€“ why Grigoriev didn't burn the ammunition depot 18: 12 After the fight, the Yakut melee fighter repulsed four more APU attacks 20: 24 AFU militants were afraid of the help that allegedly came up 21: 07 Why did the first rollback attempt fail 22: 38 Vsushniki specially change into civilian clothes 23: 24 Enemies considered "Tutu" dead and it saved his life 25: 03 Chronicle of Yakut melee rescue 26: 59 Three prophetic dreams helped to get out to the Yakut melee fighter 28: 52 Why is it safer to go out on a postcard than through the forest 29: 50 How during the rollback "Tuta" helped our offensive 30: 41 Speed saved a fighter from death in a burnt-out MTLB 31: 22 Dead friends tried to warn Yakut about the drone strike 33: 18 How did the tasks of "Tuta" change in positions from flag setting to reconnaissance 33: 58 Family helped the fighter last 6 days 34: 22 Yakut melee destroyed a mortar crew of the Armed Forces of Ukraine 35: 54 Why in the most difficult moment the ancestors do not leave 36: 16 How Grigoriev was able to avoid death under the fire of his colleagues 38: 02 Why the fighter didn't want to call for help 41: 40 How "Tuta" did not learn his native language when returning to his own 42: 24 Why the fighter was not ashamed of tears when meeting with his comrades 43: 04 How many opponents did the Yakut melee fighter destroy 43: 32 Why Yakut melee 4 days kept the last cigarette 45: 18 How many combat exits did Andrey Grigoriev have 47: 20 Why the third fight becomes decisive 49: 13 History and fate of the saving knife 50: 28 Yakut melee fighter could not finish watching the video of his fight

SIMPLICIUS ัฐ

307,065 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ตPRESSER๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ โ€ ๐ŸŽ™ Enzo Marescaโ€™s Full Post-Wolves Press Conference ๐Ÿบโšฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: โ€œHappy with the clean sheet ๐Ÿงคโœ…, and making lots of chances ๐ŸŽฏ. Iโ€™m worried by this kind of game ๐Ÿ˜ฌ โ€” you have to win these games ๐Ÿ†. First half โ€“ we didnโ€™t concede ๐Ÿšซ and created chances โšก๏ธ. Second half, we scored the goals โšฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ช.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Alejandro Garnacho: โ€œHe was very good ๐Ÿ‘. Not only on the ball โšฝ๏ธ but also off it ๐Ÿ’จ, especially when he was pressing ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€” and this is what we need from our wingers ๐Ÿ’ช. Garnacho is doing well ๐ŸŒŸ, Pedro Neto is doing well ๐Ÿ’™, Estevรฃo is doing well ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท. We need them all to be doing well ๐Ÿ™Œ.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: โ€œItโ€™s part of my job ๐Ÿ‘”, itโ€™s part of the game ๐ŸŽฎ [rotation]. At the end, this is a business ๐Ÿ’ผ โ€” when you donโ€™t win there are problems ๐Ÿ˜ค but when you win everything is good ๐Ÿ˜Œ.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Malo Gustoโ€™s goal: โ€œFinallyโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜… Last season, [Marc] Cucurella scored different goals โšฝ๏ธ as an attacking full-back ๐Ÿš€. Malo was close many times โฑ๏ธ but finally he gave us the goal we needed for 1-0 ๐Ÿ”ฅ. Malo is one of our main players ๐Ÿ’ช because he allows us to be versatile ๐Ÿ”„.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on progress this season: โ€œItโ€™s more noise from outside ๐Ÿ”Š. Inside, we are convinced ๐Ÿ’™ that as a club and as a team we are going in the right direction ๐Ÿ“ˆ and doing good things โœ…. At the same time, we can do many things better ๐Ÿ”ง.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Alejandro Garnacho: โ€œHe arrived here from another club ๐ŸŸ๏ธ where he was not training 100% โš ๏ธ. He knows to play with us he has to be good on and off the ball โšฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ. We are very happy with him ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ™Œ.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Estevรฃo being valued at ยฃ100m+ ๐Ÿ’ฐ by CIES Football Observatory this week: โ€œYou can see that, absolutely ๐Ÿ‘€. He is top ๐ŸŒŸ. For this club in the next five, ten years ๐Ÿ“…, he will be a top, top, top player ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’Ž.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: โ€œMoi was okay ๐Ÿ‘ but Pedro Neto and Enzo Fernandez asked for change for groin and knee injuries ๐Ÿค•๐Ÿฉน.โ€ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: โ€œOur mood is good in any case ๐Ÿ˜Œ๐Ÿ’™. Itโ€™s the noise from outside ๐Ÿ”Š because you drop points against a team doing well โš”๏ธ. People expect Chelsea to win all the games ๐Ÿ† but the reality is itโ€™s not like this ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.โ€ #CFC ๐Ÿ’™ | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ”ต | #CHEWOL โš”๏ธ | #Interviews ๐ŸŽค ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC VIA TELEGRAM cc: Tom Overend , SHAYEE ๐’€ญ , Oluwaseun ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ

Miki Djan

27,265 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

๐Ÿšจ69 ๐• MINUTES UNCUT: COAL VS COASTS: GRAY'S LAND GAMBIT BEGINS Secretary Chuck Gray, Wyoming Secretary of State, takes us inside the historic passage of proof of citizenship voting laws, the legal showdown with Marc Elias, and the battle against โ€œwokeโ€ energy projects threatening the stateโ€™s coal, oil, and gas industries. From defending President Trumpโ€™s executive orders to expanding MAGAโ€™s footprint in state politics, Chuck reveals insider resistance, foreign land threats, and the push to restore Americaโ€™s energy dominance. 00:36 Wyoming becomes first state to apply proof of citizenship to ALL races 01:28 Marc Elias sues to stop the law and loses in federal court 02:46 โ€œWhen they lose legislatively, the radical left runs to activist judgesโ€ 03:31 Trump names proof of citizenship a top 2024 campaign and administration priority 04:26 Governor Mark Gordon refuses to sign and the law takes effect without him 05:13 March 25, 2025: Trump signs EO requiring proof of citizenship on federal voter forms 05:43 Radical left lawsuits and injunctions try to block it nationwide 06:41 90%+ bipartisan support for proof of citizenship including most Democrats 07:46 โ€œCiting the 14th Amendment to block this is absurdโ€ 09:15 Federal court tosses case for lack of standing with no one harmed by the law 10:55 Why proof of citizenship is central to protecting the Republic 11:19 DOJ backs Wyomingโ€™s case which was pivotal in the win 12:13 White House meeting on SAFE System for voter list maintenance 15:19 Even in California 75% support proof of citizenship to register 17:45 Trumpโ€™s stand against wind turbines: โ€œKilling machines for birdsโ€ 18:28 Spanish company proposes massive Wyoming wind to hydrogen project 19:55 Race to push projects before Trump ends subsidies 21:34 Insider coalition props up woke energy against public will 23:43 Pressure campaigns force insiders to back MAGA priorities 24:11 The Troika: legacy media, big money, and Democrat crossover voters 25:15 Building a Freedom Caucus majority in Wyomingโ€™s House 26:25 Key Trump priorities include energy dominance, stopping ESG, and banning foreign land ownership 28:16 Fight to export clean Wyoming coal blocked by West Coast states 31:32 How radical left coal blockade harms global life expectancy 33:15 Using federal power to stop unconstitutional trade restrictions 37:21 โ€œThe left wants to destroy our industries and our potentialโ€ 38:46 Partnering with Trump administration to build coal export ports 39:16 Ban on foreign adversaries buying U.S. land and dissolving hostile owned companies 42:12 Focus on Wyomingโ€™s soda ash industry and stopping woke wind and solar 44:05 Urgent push to block projects before subsidies expire 69 ๐• Minutes UNCUT โ€“ Hosted and presented by Erin Molan

Mario Nawfal

253,775 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 11 ay รถnce

A White Lifeguard, Two Black Teens, and a City That Spun the Bullet: Douglass Park Pool Shooting by drkugler June 28, 2025 (Chicago) A white lifeguard shot two Black teens at a West Side pool. One is dead. One is in intensive care. The cityโ€™s response? Obfuscation, distraction, and a propaganda blitz to protect its institutions. At 7:03 p.m. on June 26, gunfire erupted near the Douglass Park pool and fieldhouse. Fifteen-year-old Marjay Dotson was shot in the back and died. Fourteen-year-old Jeremy Herred, a student at UIC College Prep and cousin of Laquan McDonaldโ€”the 17-year-old whose police killing in 2014 sparked national protestsโ€”was shot in the neck and remains hospitalized with possible brain damage. The shooter is confirmed as a 55-year-old white lifeguard employed by the Chicago Park District. A concealed carry holder and military trained, he told responding officers: โ€œThose two kids attacked me and followed me. I defended myself. I have a license.โ€ He was found kneeling beside his bicycle with a 9mm handgun on the pavement next to him. One witness confirmed the teens approached him near the bike. He reached into his bag and fired two shots. "He was knelt down with his hand overtop of his gun. His right hand on top of his gun, his left hand on top of his backpack," said witness Lydia Abraham. "He seemed calm. He seemed normal." Sent in from a reader ... "I believe last year that same man had an altercation at that same pool involved troubled youth and had to close and shut down the park early toward the end of summer due to the same acts and threats of violence towards him and his staff." While the lifeguard had been detained, no one has been charged. The Manufactured Narrative Within hours, the media-industrial complex went to work. Block Club Chicago, which branded the shooting a racist hate crime before police confirmed the shooterโ€™s identity, framed the story with emotional quotes, racial outrage, and a ready-made legal villain. Attorney Jeff Neslund, who represented the McDonald family in their civil suit, is now calling for hate crime charges: โ€œThereโ€™s absolutely no justification ever to shoot someone in the back, let alone a child.โ€ Park District officials issued a bland statement. Alderwoman Monique Scott, a former Park District employee herself, added: โ€œI canโ€™t see myself waking up, taking a weapon to work, and firing at children.โ€ But no one has addressed the root cause: Why did a city employee feel compelled to bring a gun to work at a public pool? If his fear was justified, this is a collapse of city safety. If it wasnโ€™t, then the Park District hired a man incapable of handling the job. Either way, the system failedโ€”again. Employee Protection or Executable Offense? According to Illinois law (720 ILCS 5/12-3.05), assaulting a government employeeโ€”like a lifeguardโ€”is a felony. If the teens physically confronted the lifeguard prior to the shooting, as the suspect claims, it may form the legal basis for a self-defense case. But if the teens were retreating or non-threatening when the shots were fired, then the lifeguard escalated a conflict into a homicide. What is clear: city systems sent this man to supervise childrenโ€”armedโ€”without any backup, de-escalation plan, or meaningful oversight. The Week Started with a Murder on the CTA โ€” and Ended in Bloodshed Across Chicagoโ€™s Public Spaces If city officials want to portray Douglass Park as an isolated tragedy, theyโ€™re ignoring the week that led up to itโ€”and the systemwide failure that followed. It started with a murder on the CTA. On Wednesday, June 25, 42-year-old Jason Rowinski was stabbed to death during an argument aboard a CTA Blue Line train near Rosemont. His attacker, 66-year-old Lawrence Strother, plunged a sharp object into his thighโ€”likely hitting a major artery. Rowinski bled out and died. Strother was arrested hours later and charged with First Degree Murder. That same night, less than an hour later, another mass shooting unfolded inside Ogden Park in Englewood. At 6:52 p.m., gunfire erupted in the 6500 block of South Throop Street, near the parkโ€™s swimming pool. A 25-year-old man, a 32-year-old woman, and a 37-year-old man were all shot multiple times by an unknown assailant. Their bloodied clothes, shoes, and hats were left strewn across the pavement as first responders rushed them to the University of Chicago Hospital in serious condition. Police recovered a black sedan, doors open, near the scene. Bullet casings littered the street. A dozen officers processed evidence while local violence interrupters from Integrity & Fidelity Peacekeepers showed up to try to prevent retaliation. โ€œThis goes on a lot,โ€ said outreach worker Jason Perry. โ€œWe try our best to keep it down as much as possible.โ€ No arrests. No press conferences. No justice. Then, just 24 hours later, came Douglass Park, where a 55-year-old white city employee shot two unarmed Black teensโ€”killing Marjay Dotson and critically wounding Jeremy Herred. And hours after that, CPD fired a shot during a crowd incident in Armstrong Park in Bronzeville. On June 26, at approximately 10:28 p.m., CPD officers approached a large, unruly gathering in Armstrong (Lillian Hardin) Park at 4400 S. St. Lawrence. When an offender pushed an officer and fled, a foot pursuit ensued. The suspect ran around a building and advanced on the officer, who discharged one round. No injuries were reported. A suspect was arrested. The incident is under investigation. Three parks. One train. Four days. Six people attacked with extreme violence. Two dead. No city official held accountable. Yet the mayor shows up with talking points, and the Park District dares to claim: โ€œIn spite of this tragic event, Douglass Park remains a safe and vibrant community anchor.โ€ It isnโ€™t. And if parks, pools, and trains are no longer safe for children, working families, or even city employeesโ€”then what is? This wasnโ€™t a tragic week. It was a warning shot. And the city is still trying to spin it. The Bottom Line This was not a random act. It was not unforeseeable. It was not isolated. It was the logical result of a broken city placing workers and children into chaotic, violent, under-resourced environmentsโ€”and then letting them fend for themselves. Two teens were shot. One died. A lifeguard pulled the trigger. The city spun the story. And now, the public is left to bury the truth: Chicagoโ€™s parks are not safe. And neither is the system that pretends they are. References Homicide, Person Shot โ€“ 1400 block of Sacramento (26 June 2025 7:03 p.m.) Chicago shooting: 3 shot, seriously injured in Ogden Park (25 June 2025) Man fatally stabbed on CTA Blue Line โ€“ Jason Rowinski (25 June 2025) Police-involved shooting, Armstrong Park โ€“ 4400 S. St. Lawrence (26 June 2025) While there are many rumors floating around ChitownCrimeChasers Facebook post (27 June 2025) Lifeguard tells police teens attacked him (27 June 2025) Families call for hate crime investigation (27 June 2025) Lifeguard questioned, video exists (27 June 2025 11:56 p.m.) Police report confirms lifeguard shooter (27 June 2025) Illinois Criminal Code 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(c) Aggravated Battery Based On Status Of Victim (d) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by discharge of a firearm, he or she knows the individual battered to be any of the following: (6) An officer or employee of the State of Illinois, a unit of local government, or a school district, while performing his or her official duties. 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(b) Aggravated Battery Based On Location (c) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by the discharge of a firearm, he or she is or the person battered is on or about a public way, public property, a public place of accommodation or amusement, a sports venue, a domestic violence shelter, or in a church, synagogue, mosque, or other building, structure, or place used for religious worship. Video Credit Two Teens Shot, One Fatally at Douglass Park by Lifeguard North Lawndale, Chicago Douglass Park Jun 26 7:10:55 PM CDT #ChicagoScanner #Crime #chicago

SubX.Newsยฎ

88,397 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW w/ TOMMY ROBINSON: GROOMING GANGS, CENSORSHIP CONTROL AND STATE COVER-UPS The last time I interviewed Tommy was just hours before he was taken to jail. Last year, I thought I understood the battles he was fighting. But things have only gotten worse: censorship is tightening, courts are being used as weapons, and immigration is reshaping communities at breakneck speed. And Tommyโ€™s warning today was blatant: The grooming gang crisis happening to the UK could soon happen in the US, Australia and other EU countries. This is the most explosive conversation yet on mass immigration, state censorship, and what Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง calls the coordinated cover-up of Britain's darkest scandal. We talk about how the UK is becoming a โ€œtotalitarian state,โ€ why the West is sleepwalking into collapse, and how Elon Musk buying ๐• changed the game for censored voices like his, allowing him and others to fight back against those in power. From political blacklists to anti-terror laws used on journalists โ€“ this isn't just about Britain. Itโ€™s a warning for every Western country. 01:03 โ€“ โ€œIf Elon didnโ€™t buy ๐•, no one wouldโ€™ve seen the film.โ€ 02:30 โ€“ Why he broke the law on purpose: โ€œI wasnโ€™t on trial. The state was.โ€ 04:02 โ€“ โ€œThey wanted to break me. I broke their narrative.โ€ 06:00 โ€“ The cost of speaking out: โ€œI came out of solitary ruined.โ€ 08:47 โ€“ Elon shares The Rape of Britain: from 40K views to 26 million 12:10 โ€“ September 13th: The protest Tommy says could shake the UK 15:06 โ€“ Grooming gangs: โ€œ20% of Muslim men in one town were raping childrenโ€ 21:00 โ€“ 90% conviction claim explained: Name analysis, media silence 26:56 โ€“ โ€œTheyโ€™re not integrating. Islam doesnโ€™t allow it.โ€ 29:53 โ€“ No whistleblowers: โ€œNot one Muslim reported the rapesโ€ 33:30 โ€“ Epping case: migrant rights ruled above childrenโ€™s safety 39:01 โ€“ Immigration is policy, not accident: โ€œThey invited them inโ€ 43:34 โ€“ โ€œThey weaponized the law. The courts. The media.โ€ 46:25 โ€“ Banned from PayPal, banks, even email: โ€œThey made me invisibleโ€ 50:54 โ€“ โ€œUnite the Kingdomโ€: How his rallies sparked a populist wave 52:10 โ€“ Arrested under Terrorism Act โ€“ for refusing to give police his phone 55:36 โ€“ Claims of sexual assault cover-up tied to Labour MP & mayor 58:47 โ€“ โ€œWhy was it left to me? Why didnโ€™t they stop it?โ€ 01:00:22 โ€“ โ€œLegacy media is dead. Citizen journalism will save us.โ€ 01:01:31 โ€“ Final message: โ€œThe people are awake. This is our moment.โ€

Mario Nawfal

1,975,416 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 10 ay รถnce

The Enemy Within: An American Muslim Claims - The U.S. is the Enemy of Islam By: Ofer Binshtok Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril, whose many followers rely on his vast and profound knowledge of Islam, positions the United Statesโ€”his birthplace and country of citizenshipโ€”as an enemy of Muslims. He asserts that the West, led by the U.S., fundamentally opposes Sharia and Tawhid, listing it alongside Israel and Russia as part of a hostile coalition against Islamโ€™s victory. To him, Islam views the U.S. as an enemy, and every believing Muslim must recognize this. "The army of the Jews is a stoneโ€™s throw away with tanks and planes, waging war alongside the U.S.," he says, yet emphasizes: "They achieve a stunning, lightning-speed victory"โ€”a clear allusion to the conquest of Damascus and the fall of Assad through Jihad. He declares Jihad as "the central pillar" of Islam, rejecting any permanent treaty with disbelievers like the U.S., who "will never accept Sharia," as it negates the struggle to impose Allahโ€™s laws. Citing verses such as "And fight them until there is no more fitnah" (Al-Anfal 8:39), he permits only temporary truces. Jibril sees the victory over Assad as a step in the Jihad to establish Sharia, paving the way to defeat the U.S. and Israelโ€”Islamโ€™s primary enemies. Details of His Criminal Acts: In 2004, Jibril was convicted in Detroit, alongside his father, on 42 serious charges: conspiracy, bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and possession of firearms and ammunition as a felon. The prosecution uncovered a sophisticated scheme involving the destruction of his properties to collect insurance money, resulting in losses of about $400,000. A mail carrier identified mail sent to over 80 aliases, and fake voter registration cards under fictitious names were found at his sisterโ€™s home. Sentenced to 6.5 years in a maximum-security prison in Terre Haute, Indiana ("Guantanamo North"), he was released in 2012 and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution. These crimes reveal a pattern of criminal behavior that aligns with his views. Background: Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are seen as influential among Jihad supporters via social media. Part Two: Implications for the U.S. and the Historical Dimension Muslims in the U.S. who adopt Jibrilโ€™s worldview pose a cunning and dangerous internal threat lurking within American society. With his profound knowledge, he makes it clear this is a religious duty for every believer, backed by commands like "And fight them until there is no more fitnah (non-Muslims)" (Al-Anfal 8:39) and "Slay the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them" (Al-Tawbah 9:5), perfectly aligning with Jihadโ€™s practical actions. They live in the U.S. but are loyal to a vision aiming to topple it from withinโ€”part of a 1,400-year Islamic colonialist campaign that began with Muhammadโ€™s sword, conquering Persia, Byzantium, and Spain, replacing entire cultures with Sharia. For them, the U.S. is a future battlefield, continuing a patient tradition that waited centuries to seize "infidel" lands. Americaโ€™s internal security faces a severe threatโ€”not immediate, but as part of a long, calculated historical process that Jibril and his followers represent. They exploit democratic freedoms to grow stronger and plan, just as Islam waited before Constantinople fell in 1453. The victory over Assad proves their plan is in motion, and the U.S. is a future target that could take decades or centuriesโ€”a strategy that reshaped the world over 1,400 years and, in their view, will succeed again. Chapter on Additional Supporting References: As stated in Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)โ€ As stated in Quran 9.5: โ€œ...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find themโ€ฆ" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." As stated in Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder." - The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law. 09.0 JIHAD (0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad." The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as: (1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216); (2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89); (3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran ); and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: "I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah"; and the hadith reported by Muslim, "To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it." Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD 09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace), "He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad," and Allah Most High having said: "Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95). If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims. The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can). 09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force). 09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible). Source: Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law 'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices. Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. Amana publications-Beltsville. Maryland U.S.A. Page 599-601. [CERTIFICATION OF AL-AZHAR] IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy. General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation. Mr, Nuh Ha Mim Keller. Amman, Jordan. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. To commence: In response to the request you have submitted concerning the examination of the English translation of the book 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat alnasik by Ahmad ibn Naqib in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence, together with appendices by Islamic scholars on matters of Islamic law, tenets of faith, and personal ethics and character: we certify that the above-mentioned translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community (Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a). There is no objection to printing it and circulating it. The stamping of the pages of the above-mentioned work with the seal of the department has been completed. May Allah give you success in serving Sacred Knowledge and the religion. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. Composed on 26 Rajab 1411 A.H.l11 February 1991 A.D. General Director of Research, Writing, and Translation Fath Allah Ya Sin Jazar [signed] Muhammad 'Umar Muhammad 'Umar [signed] Seal of al-Azhar [stamped] General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation. - Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels? No. By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allahโ€™s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. *According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "โ€ฆThe Messenger of Allah (๏ทบ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostleโ€ฆ" * According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "โ€ฆSo do not weaken and call for peace while you are superiorโ€ฆ" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (๏ทบ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: โ€œLying in time of warโ€. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allฤh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: โ€œIslam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelieversโ€. Quran 9.29 begins with: โ€œFight those who do not believe in Allah...โ€ The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protectedโ€ฆ" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fearโ€ that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. - A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be establishedโ€”that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it. The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran. Quran 5.51: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyรขโ€™ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyรขโ€™ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyรขโ€™), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allรขh guides not those people who are the Zรขlimรปn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." - Islamic Conquests Throughout History

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - ืขื•ืคืจ ื‘ื™ื ืฉื˜ื•ืง

122,846 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿง  INTERVIEW: WIKIPEDIAโ€™S CO-FOUNDER SAYS THE INTERNETโ€™S โ€œTRUTH MACHINEโ€ HAS BEEN CAPTURED Millions trust Wikipedia like gospel. But according to cofounder Larry Sanger, the platform has been quietly hijacked by anonymous editors, PR operatives, and intelligence-linked actors who use it to attack reputations, shape political narratives, and control what the public sees as โ€œfact.โ€ He says the worldโ€™s largest source of truth is no longer neutral. It has become a weapon against dissent, inconvenient truths, and anyone who challenges the establishment line. We break it down: โ€ขโ  โ Why 85% of Wikipediaโ€™s top editors hide behind anonymity โ€ขโ  โ How intelligence agencies and billionaires exploit that weakness โ€ขโ  โ Why dissenting voices are purged while political labels get slapped on enemies โ€ขโ  โ How biased articles are shaping the training data for AI models โ€ขโ  โ And why Elon Muskโ€™s Grokipedia may become a truth-seeking alternative Sanger warns that when a billion people rely on a captured platform, the entire information ecosystem becomes vulnerable. 01:23 โ€“ Larry Sangerโ€™s โ€œNine Thesesโ€ roller coaster 01:42 โ€“ Host says Wikipediaโ€™s system was weaponized against him 03:16 โ€“ Anonymous editors running intelligence operations 03:33 โ€“ 85% of Wikipediaโ€™s โ€œcopsโ€ are anonymous 05:39 โ€“ Intelligence agencies and wealthy actors can bribe editors 07:26 โ€“ PR firms run a multimillion-dollar Wikipedia influence business 07:44 โ€“ โ€œProtection money for a reputationโ€ 09:29 โ€“ CIA and FBI caught editing pages through WikiScanner 11:11 โ€“ China and Russia influencing Wikipedia at scale 12:32 โ€“ LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok still trust Wikipedia 13:52 โ€“ The solution begins with โ€œorganizing the troopsโ€ 15:02 โ€“ Government interference is not the answer 16:44 โ€“ Control a few key accounts, control the narrative 17:25 โ€“ Wikipedia has taken a clear side in the Gaza War 18:15 โ€“ โ€œGaza Genocideโ€ article title not remotely neutral 21:51 โ€“ Religious bias exposed in the โ€œYahwehโ€ article 23:34 โ€“ 61 billion visits, a few hundred editors control global truth 25:14 โ€“ Wikipedia now dangerously centralized 31:47 โ€“ Platform captured by the establishment left 32:20 โ€“ Blacklisted sources: Fox News, Sputnik, and more 34:24 โ€“ Thesis 1: Stop using the word โ€œconsensusโ€ 34:49 โ€“ Thesis 2: Allow competing articles and frameworks 41:00 โ€“ Readers must become the arbiters of their own truth 42:55 โ€“ Thesis 4: Restore strict Neutrality 58:24 โ€“ Thesis 5: Reveal identities of executive editors 01:00:20 โ€“ Thesis 6: Create a trust score and rating system 01:09:59 โ€“ Thesis 7: Abolish source blacklists 01:14:40 โ€“ Thesis 8: End indefinite bans and permanent exile 01:17:57 โ€“ Thesis 9: Adopt a real constitutional process 01:22:41 โ€“ Call to action: Sign the petition and start editing

Mario Nawfal

1,639,725 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

"What was in the middle of the hangar was an actual flying saucer. ~GR A Secret Revealed After 33 Years - Have We Cracked Gravity? "We got it from them." (Rogers retired in April of this year.) In 1992, Dr. Gregory Rogers, a chief flight surgeon (a physician who's responsible for the health of the aviation crew, including pilots) for NASA and an Air Force major who supported 33 space shuttle launches and was also an F-18 pilot, was at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (now called Cape Canaveral Space Force Station). He had a guide from EG&G with him but that doesn't seem relevant to what happened next. A major pulled him aside and said, "Hey Doc, I've got something to show you, I've got something even you have never seen." Josh Boswell broke this story in May. H/T: Sentinel News The major took him into an office with four computer stations, locked the door and closed the blinds. They both sat down, and on one of the computer screens, the major pulled up a video that showed a generic hangar. The screen had no markings on it. No classification markings, no location, time, date, etc. "What was in the middle of the hangar was an actual flying saucer." (This next quote isn't part of my video clip and is at 25:08 of the Chris Lehto interview.) "So I said, 'Where would we get a design like this?' And [the major] said, 'We got it from them (shows his thumb pointing up).' He did not explain what he meant, but obviously, he was referring to non-human technologies from off this planet." "There were two guys in lab cats to the bottom left, and then midway up the screen on the right side, there were three guys that looked like technicians in what I would call Tyvek suits, head-to-toe. And only their faces were shown. "And then some sort of a warning sound went off and everybody cleared out. And then, within a couple of minutes, the vehicle became active." "The vehicle itself was sort of a pearly white. There were no seams, rivets, windows, doors. Nothing that could be identified. It looked as though it was sort of a modified egg, if you just sort of shifted it around. "There was a tiny little area on top that protruded and there was a mast that came out. And on the mast, it looked like there were three umbilicals coming off." There were various, flat-black rectangles (horizontal and vatical). "I believe that these were made to monitor the movement of this craft." [Since] "it was perfectly pearly white, and it began to move, there was nothing there to show you that it was moving. So, just like any experimental aircraft, they put markings on it so you could monitor the motion. And that's what I believe these rectangles were. "There were electromagnetic discharges that told me that the vehicle had become active, and they were very peculiar. But I don't wish to describe them to anyone because, if this was a test-bed model, whatever the mechanisms were being used may still be active in more advanced craft, and I don't want to give out information that would be beneficial to those opposing the United States. But, as soon as it started to do this... (Video picks up again here. ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ ) "...it just sort of lifted off the floor. The floor looked like a concrete floor with like, some sort of rubber matt that had been on top of it." "It lifted off, just like a feather. It rose about three feet in the air and then just hung there. The next thing that it does is that it rotates 360 degrees, clockwise. As it rotated across, I could see the writing, 'U.S. Air Force.' And then it had an American flight insignia just above that." "It completed a 360-degree circle, paused, and then completed a 360-degree circle counterclockwise, so that it was in the same position it had started in. It moved to the left and right, it moved forward and backwards. It's just like, you know, you're testing your controls, making sure you have everything working. "And then, it rotated to a 45-degree angle of attack, if it were flying and the 12-o'clock position (where the U.S. Navy and flight insignia was located) was going forward. This was amazing. Fixed-wing aircraft can't do this. A helicopter can go to a 45-degree angle of attack, but it's going to be moving forward and lifting. This thing did not do that. And so, this shocked me more than anything else, because it did not move one centimeter as it moved to what would be a 45-degree angle of attack. So that just blew me away. "Just about that time, there's a knock on the door. The guy hits the buttons to turn the computer and screen off, and he says, 'Don't tell anyone I showed you this!' "Well, I'm gonna go around telling somebody that you showed me a flying saucer? Well he goes to the door, opens it - we were both majors - and so this Lt. Colonel and two other guys came in. And so the Lt. Colonel said, "What's going on in here that you had the doors locked?" To see how they got out of this pickle, and why Rogers didn't turn in the major for showing him a classified video, watch the rest of the clip. "Along the way, I thought, 'I can't tell this to anybody.' I didn't even tell it to my wife for 15 years. But, as long as I was associated with the [DoD], I did not want to risk what the repercussions were gonna be as soon as I told this story. ~~~ How far have our reverse engineering efforts progressed? This is from my August of 2023 post. "There are people who say we have reverse-engineered them and are flying them. I never found any support for that. And found a lot of support for saying we canโ€™t figure it out. If we do, it would be in some program at a higher security level.โ€ ~Michael Shellenberger ~~~ Former intel and defense contractor, and my friend, Michael Via, who I've interviewed multiple times, had his sighting of a silent, black, "majestic" triangle craft in 1992 in the Persian Gulf. He thinks it's our tech. ~~~ And then there's Nick Cook, the former aviator editor for Jane's Defence Weekly and a very respected, award-winning journalist, and author. His gut tells him that we (humans) may have cracked gravity. But he doesn't have the proof. "I found plenty of evidence the US had been trying, tho. I have no firm evidence now (who does?), but 20 years on from #THFZP, I think it is possible the antigrav issue has been cracked. Wish I could say this was more than a hunch, but this is all it is." ~Nick Cook A hunch. Possible. ~~~ And my favorite anecdote of all time, from another person I consider a friend. Retired Commander Will Miller: "I had a friend, a former military officer who worked with me. [He went to work at] the famous Groom Lake facility, Area 51 and he was out there for several years. As we all know, most folks that work out there have signed their lives away, never to disclose what goes on and for better or for worse, and this fella was no different. And over the three years I worked with him โ€“ and he knew my interest in things extraterrestrial and my work with CSETI โ€“ never once did he mention any of his work out at Groom Lake or any association between that and anything extraterrestrial. "And the day I was leaving the command, he took me aside and he said, 'You know, Will, some of the folks you talk with, maybe some CSETI researchers, may see objects that are doing, you know, Mach 9 and then suddenly make a right angle turn and you say, "Well, gosh, thatโ€™s got to be an extraterrestrial craft."' "And then he looked at me and he said, 'But itโ€™s not.' And he just turned and walked away." ~Commander Will Miller (Retired) My original post is here: ~~~ One thing that Dr. Gregory Rogers said to Lehto really jumped out at me: "And then, it rotated to a 45-degree angle of attack." Numerous witnesses have reported craft tilting up at a 45-degree angle right before they shoot off at a high rate of speed. I wrote a long thread on it (which I can't find) and Danny Silva wrote an article on it several years ago. Here's a thread from Willy Sam that covers some of that. And if you Google "UFO tilt up 45 degrees," you'll find more. Did we figure out something about UFOs and tilting up?

Joe Murgia

25,246 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿšจ MASSIVE RED FLAG In The Charlie Kirk ASSASSINATION โ€“ Southern Utah CONNECTION That DEMANDS Answers! On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. According to the Official Fed-Slop Narrative, A single precision shot from ~142-175 yards away ended his life in front of thousands. The accused shooter: 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson from Washington/St. George area in Southern Utah. Now here's where it gets extremely suspicious: Colby Jenkins โ€“ a longtime St. George resident, former congressional candidate in that district (2024), Green Beret veteran โ€“ was appointed in early 2025 by President Trump as Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict (ASD SO/LIC) at the Pentagon. That's the top civilian overseeing U.S. Special Operations Forces (Green Berets, SEALs, etc.), irregular warfare, counter-subversion, information operations (MISO/PSYOPS), and policy linking DoD with FBI/DHS on threats. Both Jenkins and Robinson hail from the same tight-knit Southern Utah community (St. George/Washington County โ€“ heavily Mormon, conservative area). Jenkins lived/worked there for years (Google ops, local politics). Robinson grew up there, attended local schools/tech college. Coincidence? Maybe. But let's connect some dots speculatively โ€“ because the timing and expertise raise HUGE questions. Jenkins' office specializes in: ๐Ÿ”ดIrregular Warfare (IW): Handling "gray zone" conflicts, asymmetric threats, countering insurgencies/subversion. ๐Ÿ”ดPredictive analytics/AI for spotting "radicalization arcs" and lone wolves. ๐Ÿ”ดSharing "best practices" with FBI/JTTFs on domestic threats post-NSPM-7. ๐Ÿ”ด"Shaping the environment" to prevent or start conflict. Just 15 days after Kirk's death (Sept 25, 2025), Trump signed NSPM-7: "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence." This memo massively expands Pentagon/FBI tools against "domestic extremists" โ€“ financial disruption, network mapping, info ops โ€“ citing Kirk's assassination as key justification. Jenkins has publicly pushed for "smarter systems," "unrelenting action," and applying SOF tactics domestically against "converging threats." Robinson reportedly showed clear signs of radicalization: Became "more political," pro-LGBTQ rights, angry at Kirk's views (texted: "I had enough of his hatred"). Planned the attack for over a week. Digital footprint with "obsession" over Kirk. If we're to believe the official line that Robinson was a "lone wolf" radicalized locally (BIG IF, given the precision shot and planning)... Then WHY wasn't he flagged beforehand? Jenkins' ASD SO/LIC office โ€“ with its AI pattern recognition, data-driven monitoring, liaison with FBI โ€“ is EXACTLY positioned to spot high-risk individuals in rural/hotspot areas like Southern Utah (Jenkins emphasized rural radicalization in 2026 proposals). Jenkins knows St. George intimately. His office coordinates threat assessments, shares intel with local law enforcement (sheriffs, JTTFs). If advanced Pentagon/FBI systems flagged Robinson as a threat (digital posts, searches, behavior matching "radicalization arc") โ€“ and they HAD prior intel โ€“ they could/should have prevented it. But they didn't. That leaves two possibilities: 1โƒฃGross incompetence in a "home turf" case for the top SOF policy guy. 2โƒฃDeliberate stand-down: They had the intel... and let it happen. Why let it happen? Cui bono? Kirk's death immediately provided the "catalyst event" for NSPM-7 โ€“ unlocking unprecedented domestic powers for Jenkins' office. Blamed on "left-wing" ideology, justified crackdown on dissent. Some speculate Kirk was becoming a rival (independent power base, TPUSA as "shadow party," potential foreign policy rifts). His martyrdom unified the base, enabled policy shifts benefiting the admin's agenda. If Robinson was monitored but not stopped โ€“ that's complicity. A "managed failure" to create the justifying crisis. We need answers: ๐Ÿ‘‰Was Robinson on any watchlist pre-9/10? ๐Ÿ‘‰Did Jenkins' office/Pentagon provide threat intel to UVU security (stuck on outdated plan, no rooftop coverage)? ๐Ÿ‘‰Any prior contact (direct/indirect) between Jenkins' networks and Robinson in St. George? This isn't just coincidence. Geographical overlap + expertise in preventing exactly this type of attack + massive policy payoff post-event = DEMAND INVESTIGATION. FOIA requests? Congressional probe? Who's asking these questions? What do you think? False flag catalyst? Incompetence? Or something darker? Tag Candace Owens and RT if you want truth. ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ”ฅ

Project Constitution

42,742 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce

๐Ÿšจโ€œThis Post Will Destroy Every Fake MAGA Patriot and Intel-Asset Infiltrator on This Platformโ€๐Ÿšจ Some of you demand play-by-play updates while President Trump dismantles the most powerful, satanic, and demonic cabal in human history, a cabal literally run by the agents of satan himself. You want Trump to livestream the battle plan to save humanity like itโ€™s a reality show. You want him to post his moves in real-timeโ€ฆ while the Cabalโ€™s intelligence networks watch every keystroke. You want him to hand over the Super Bowl playbook for humanity to the very demons weโ€™re fighting, because your feelings told you, you deserve it? NEWSFLASH: You donโ€™t deserve the playbook in real time if you didn't sign up to deploy it. You deserve the results. You deserve a free country. You deserve food thatโ€™s not poisoned for profit. You deserve fair & free elections. You deserve justice. You deserve safety for your children. You deserve freedom from systemic slavery. But NO, you donโ€™t deserve to be briefed mid-operation just so your dopamine fires while global operations hang in the balance. Thatโ€™s not how war works. Thatโ€™s not how victory is secured. REAL warriors are out there right now, risking their lives in the shadows. Theyโ€™re undercover in cartel strongholds, infiltrating trafficking rings, and snatching children out of hellholes while you sit comfortably behind a keyboard virtue signaling, pretending you've earned a voice in this fight. You have a voice in the fight, you didn't earn it. Other men who sacrificed their lives earned it - not you. Youโ€™ve never risked your life for this country. Youโ€™ve never stared evil in the face with nothing but courage and training to back you up. Youโ€™ve never kicked in doors to rescue kids while praying youโ€™d make it home alive. The only thing youโ€™re entitled to is results, period. You donโ€™t get to cry because itโ€™s not unfolding how you want, or at the speed your emotions demand. You have no experience, No training, and no clue how to dismantle the most powerful satanic empire in human history. How do I know? Because many of you exposed yourself with this gem: โ€œJust let the whole system crash if thatโ€™s what it takes, we can handle the truth.โ€ NEWS FLASH #2: Thatโ€™s not strategy, thatโ€™s the emotional outburst of a man without a plan, fishing for likes and cheers. Hereโ€™s the reality: Most of America canโ€™t handle the truth! Get mad, argue - it is the truth. This is not the AMERICA of 1776. This is the AMERICA of soft men being critical of REAL warriors. COVID was the test. They wore masks that didnโ€™t protect them. They took jabs that killed or maimed them, years after knowing they were deadly. To keep a job. They lined their newborns up for Remdesivir and stayed silent. And you? You posted. You tweeted. You virtue signaled. You didnโ€™t stop it. Now you want people to believe youโ€™ll lead the charge when the system collapses? Spare me the ego. Unlike you, Iโ€™ve gone to war with evil. Gunfights. Fist fights. Door breaching as the first man in the stack. This is what I know from that life: This is not a movie. Good does NOT automatically rise from the ashes of collapse. Evil does. Why? Because evil is organized. Because good is slow to mobilize. Because most of humanity is inherently good and evil exploits that every single time. You think collapse equals freedom? It equals open season on the innocent, especially the children. Need proof? Why do you think the Deep State keeps pushing civil war, riots and millions of illegals into the United States? Because they know what you donโ€™t: chaos favors evil. Meanwhile, President Trump is playing on a global battlefield, orchestrating peace, securing sovereignty, and threading the needle of maximum justice with minimum loss of life, lives will perish, innocent will perish-this is what happens in WAR you are not built to handle. And you think your angry thread dictated his moves? LOLOLOL. Trump created the environment that gave you the freedom to rant in the first place. He baited your rant for his plan. Expose. Unite. Momentum. Heโ€™s being hunted by the most powerful intelligence apparatus on Earth and youโ€™re over here thinking your social media meltdown matters? Hereโ€™s the truth: Some of you are knowingly weaponizing this environment to turn the weak-minded against the President. Youโ€™re not fighting evil. Youโ€™re feeding it. You're a part of it. Letโ€™s talk about Epstein. Some of you parroting that Trump called Epsteinโ€™s crimes a โ€œhoaxโ€ are either: โ€ข Foolish โ€ข Unresearched โ€ข Or operatives trying to sabotage support for President Trump. Why? Because in the words of Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Epsteinโ€™s victims: โ€œThe only thing I can say about President Trump is that he was the only person who picked up the phone, said โ€˜letโ€™s talk,โ€™ and gave me all the time I needed. He had good information that helped us. He gave no indication of involvement in anything untoward.โ€ While Clinton was flying the Lolita Express 26 times to the island and others were lawyering up, Trump helped the victims. Heโ€™s not confused about Epstein, he knows exactly who Epstein was/is. And more importantly, he knows what Epstein was a front for. Trumpโ€™s calling out the investigation as the hoax, the fake justice, the planted evidence, the destroyed files, the perjured agents, and the two-tiered system designed to protect the guilty and frame the innocent. Some of you scream โ€œDonโ€™t trust the government!โ€ in one breath and demand the government give you the truth about Epstein in the next. You want the the investigation from the DOJ you say is against you? Thatโ€™s not intelligence. Thatโ€™s next-level ReTard. President Trump is running the largest RICO investigation in American history, with 450,000+ sealed indictments and counting. You know what everyone is suddenly talking about again? Jeffrey Epstein. Even the left. Even Mockingbird media. Even the controlled ops. Why? Because Trump understands the power of momentum. He understands the power of common enemies. He understands he must unify America without endless wars and catastrophes... So what did he do? He exposed to America a common enemy Epstein. A face for evil. A symbol of systemic betrayal. And a thread that connects the entire Cabal. This is not a social media platform anymore. This is the trench warfare of the Information Age. Youโ€™re watching 5GW in real time and mistaking it for campaign season and policies. Trump rescued over 10,000 missing children. Congress just raised that number to 35,000 (pending confirmation from Tom Homan). Heโ€™s overseen the arrest of over 1,000 pedophile traffickers and thatโ€™s in under 6 1/2 months. Yet many of you โ€œchild-firstโ€ influencers never report it, or worse...mock it. Why? Because youโ€™re not in this for the children. Youโ€™re in this for influence. And some of you are leveraged by the very establishment Trump is destroying. Letโ€™s be clear: I want Hillary Clinton and the rest indicted. We all do. But Hillary isnโ€™t the one snatching kids from the streets. Sheโ€™s the customer. Trump is hunting the foot soldiers. Heโ€™s dismantling the system. And youโ€™re mad heโ€™s not giving you viral optics? You say heโ€™s protecting pedos? Heโ€™s the only president whoโ€™s declared war on them. Ask yourself: Why do these influencers really want Trump gone? Because they know what I know... Trump is taking down the network. And when he wins, they fall with it. 6ยฝ months in, look whatโ€™s already happened. The same people who swore Trump would: -Start WW3 -Send troops into Iran -Crash the economy with tariffs -Destroy the dollar Were wrong. Every. Single. Time. And Trump, as always, was right. Demand results. Keep digging into Epstein. But donโ€™t fall for the psyop of taking down Trump in the process. You can seek truth and support your President. Because in this war, one thing is certain: Heโ€™s the only one fighting it for real, not from a keyboard. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Semper Fi, -ALPHA

ALPHAWARRIOR

188,924 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

BOOM!!! ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimรคki ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ

aussie17

796,405 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Donald J. Trump You are just another puppet for the globalist Zionist Rothschild bankers who control America, just like the other presidents before you. You are just another war criminal and traitor to humanity. You don't care about America; you care more about the elite and Israel than you do about American citizens. You're nothing but a con man. You're the most pro-Israel president there ever was. If you win this election, youโ€™re going to keep simping for Israel just like the other presidents before you. Youโ€™re not America first; youโ€™re Israel first and the New World Order first. Trump, you go on about how you're for freedom of speech, but you recently said you will deport anti-Israel protesters if elected, which is super unconstitutional. Plus, when youโ€™re in office, you will push to go to war with Iran because your masters will tell you to, so you can help them take Iranโ€™s central bank and make their Greater Israel project. You will continue the genocide against Palestinians, which needs to stop, and push for war with China. Youโ€™ll continue the red scare propaganda and all that other nonsense. Not to mention, youโ€™re a massive shill for Big Pharma. Also, one of the Supreme Court justices you appointed ruled that presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts in office, marking the biggest government power grab since the Act of 1913, transforming America from a corporate empire to a corporate empire monarchy. So much for being America First ๐Ÿ‘‡ Things Trump did that prove he's just another puppet to the elite: 1. Gave Fauci a Presidential Commendation Award 12 hours before he left office. 2. Operation Warp Speed that killed so many people. 3. Printed $8T in one term. 4. Signed CISA into law, which created the government backdoor censorship infrastructure into social media. 5. He's the most pro-Israel president ever. 6. Lockdowns that cost America $16T. 7. Never locked up Hillary. 8. Brought the swamp into the White House: Pompeo, Bolton, Kushner, etc. 9. Made sure 600 billionaires increased their wealth by $2.3T during the โ€œpandemic.โ€ 10. Zero liability for pharma. 11. Didn't fire Fauci. 12. Jeff Sessions. 13. FBI Director Wray. 14. Appointed war criminal John Bolton as the National Security Director. 15. Section 230 immunity. 16. Continued Israel's genocide against Palestinians. 17. Killed Soleimani and wanted to go to war with Iran. 18. Wanted to invade Venezuela. 19. Did nothing to end the Federal Reserve. 20. Armed the neo-Nazis in Ukraine, just like other presidents did. 21. Recognized Israelโ€™s sovereignty over the occupied Golan Heights, which it captured from Syria in 1967. Israel annexed the Golan in 1981 in a move not recognized internationally, but Trump pretty much gave Israel the Golan Heights. 22. Appointed a Big Pharma executive connected to Bill Gates to head vaccine developments. 23. Imposed unlawful sanctions on countries, which killed a lot of people, just like other presidents did. 24. Organized a coup in Bolivia and wanted to send the military to Venezuela. 25. In just 3 years of his presidency, Trump dropped 72,000 bombs, following in his predecessors' footsteps. 26. In 2020, Trump launched more airstrikes on Somalia than Bush & Obama combined. 27. Said in 2023 that he would use โ€œSection 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Actโ€ to โ€œorder my government to deny entry to all communists and Marxists,โ€ which is unconstitutional. 28. In just the first 9 months of his presidency, he dropped more bombs on civilians than Obama and Bush. 29. Dropped the mother of non-nuclear bombs on Afghanistan. 99 Times Trump Supported the Evil State of Israel ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡ 1. President Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. 2. President Trump moved the American Embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. 3. President Trump closed the Jerusalem consulate and made it an Embassy branch. 4. President Trump has never publicly criticized Israel. 5. President Trump pulled America out of the Iran deal. 6. President Trump raised military aid to Israel by $400 million. 7. President Trump imposed sanctions on Iran as soon as he pulled out of the deal. 8. President Trump recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights. 9. President Trump designated the IRGC (Iranian special forces) as a foreign terrorist group. 10. President Trump banned BDS head Omar Barghouti from America. 11. President Trump banned the head of the ICC and its staff from coming to America. 12. President Trump backed Israelโ€™s right to self-defense in Gaza. 13. President Trump left the United Nations Human Rights Council. 14. President Trump cut off all aid to the Palestinian Authority. 15. President Trump closed the PLO office in Washington, D.C. 16. President Trump was the first president to visit the Western Wall as President. 17. President Trump sent the first official American visit to the Western Wall with an Israeli Prime Minister. 18. President Trump allowed consulate and Embassy staff to meet with Jews of Judea and Samaria. 19. President Trump allowed consulate and Embassy staff to visit Jews living in Judea and Samaria. 20. President Trump announced that America would not support Israeli soldiers being tried at the ICC. 21. President Trump called out the anti-Israel antisemitism of Ilhan Omar. 22. President Trump flew to Israel on his first foreign trip. 23. President Trump issued no waivers on increased sanctions against Iran. 24. President Trump offered a $10 million reward for information on Hamas and Hezbollah financial networks. 25. The Trump administration wrote op-eds blaming Hamas and the Palestinians for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 26. President Trump stopped the lame-duck last-minute Kerry and Obama $221 million payment to the Palestinian Authority on January 20, 2017. 27. President Trump signed the Taylor Force Act. 28. President Trump supported Israel in the May 2019 flare-up with Gaza. 29. President Trump refused a visa to Israel hater Hanan Ashrawi to America. 30. President Trump sanctioned three leading members of Hezbollah in July 2019. 31. The Trump administration blocked an attempt to get the UN Security Council to issue a formal condemnation of Israelโ€™s demolition of Palestinian homes on the edge of Jerusalem in July 2019. 32. President Trump sanctioned Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. 33. Ambassador Friedman refused to advocate for a two-state solution unfavorable to Israel. 34. President Trump removed โ€œPalestineโ€ from the list of countries on the State Department list of nations. 35. President Trump stopped a French $15 billion credit line to Iran. 36. President Trump stopped a UN Security Council statement on tensions between Israel and Hezbollah that did not single out violence by the Lebanese terror group. 37. President Trump cut $120 million from aid to Lebanon to ensure it didnโ€™t get to Hezbollah. 38. President Trump sanctioned 9 Iranians in November 2019. 39. President Trump supported Israel after rocket fire in its skirmish with Islamic Jihad. 40. President Trump said nothing about Israel limiting retaliation. 41. President Trump and America were the only countries besides Israel to vote against all 8 UN 4th committee resolutions in November 2019. 42. President Trump declared that Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria (โ€œsettlementsโ€) arenโ€™t illegal under international law. 43. President Trump hasnโ€™t supported a two-state solution as the only solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 44. Vice President Pence visited Israel during his first year in office. 45. Secretary Pompeo wrote a letter to Congress clarifying that Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria have traditionally enjoyed bipartisan support. 46. Secretary Pompeo says that claims that Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria have impeded peace are foolish. 47. President Trump didnโ€™t comment when Defense Minister Bennet green-lighted a new Jewish neighborhood in Hebron. 48. Secretary Pompeo announced that Iran is behind all the unrest in the Middle East. 49. President Trump blamed Iran for Lebanon protests. 50. President Trumpโ€™s US deputy national security adviser Victoria Coates reportedly met with envoys from UAE, Oman, Morocco, Bahrain to gauge willingness for Israeli-Arab non-belligerence agreements. 51. President Trump denounced Iran's brutal crackdown on protesters. 52. New US Ambassador to the United Nations Kelly Craft said sheโ€™ll defend Israel. In her first United Nations press conference, Kelly Craft also warned Iran that Washington has โ€˜other toolsโ€™ if Tehran continues its bad behavior. 53. President Trump regaled an Israeli-American group with tales of his pro-Israel moves, retelling an extensive account of the embassy move and telling the Israeli American Council that heโ€™s Israelโ€™s best friend in the White House. 54. President Trump signed an executive order on anti-Semitism that protects Jewish students on college campuses. The order includes anti-Israel activity. 55. Robert Oโ€™Brien told Meir Ben-Shabbat that โ€˜common interests between Israel and Arab statesโ€ฆ have made new regional partnerships possible to counter Iran.โ€™ 56. The Trump administration denounced Iranian human rights abuses and imposed sanctions on Iranian judges. 57. After President Abbas hailed the ICC declaration that it will investigate Israel as a historic day for Palestinians, Secretary Pompeo said the US โ€˜firmly opposesโ€™ the ICC announcement on alleged Israeli war crimes. He said the International Criminal Courtโ€™s move โ€˜unfairly targetsโ€™ the Jewish state and called for direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. 58. The Trump administration announced seven joint US-Israeli clean energy projects โ€” including an energy-storing system for electric cars and a hydrogen-powered drone that takes off vertically โ€” have received $6.4 million in funding from the US-Israel Binational Research and Development Program for energy. 59. America struck an Iranian-backed militia in Iraq; 19 reported killed. Israeli Air Force chief said, โ€˜US strike on Iran-backed Iraqi militia is a โ€˜potential turning point.โ€™ 60. President Trump ordered a deadly strike on Iranโ€™s Soleimani. 61. President Trump said new Iran sanctions have been imposed; they are strong and powerful. 62. President Trump said โ€˜Iran will never have nuclear weapons.โ€™ 63. Vice President Pence and PM Netanyahu met in Jerusalem. 64. President Trump and PM Netanyahu announced that heโ€™ll reveal the Middle East peace plan next week. 65. Trumpโ€™s Middle East Peace Plan favors Israel. 66. PM Netanyahu to US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office: โ€œYour Deal of the Century is the opportunity of the century.โ€ 67. President Trump, in the White Houseโ€™s East Room, said Israel is taking a โ€˜giant step toward peace.โ€™ 68. President Trump unveiled his Middle East peace plan, saying that Israel will keep Jerusalem, while the Palestinians will have their capital in eastern Jerusalem. 69. President Trump lauded Netanyahu for backing the deal, and it โ€˜demonstrates the enormous progress weโ€™ve made.โ€™ 70. President Trump said, โ€˜We will not allow a return to the days of bloodshed, bus bombings, nightclubs.โ€™ 71. President Trump said the US will recognize all existing Israeli towns in Judea and Samaria. 72. President Trump released a map of Israelโ€™s future borders under his peace plan. 73. President Trump said, โ€˜We are asking the Palestinians to meet the challenges of peaceful coexistence.โ€™ 74. US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman said Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria are part of Israel. 75. President Trumpโ€™s Middle East Peace Plan reportedly green-lighted an arms sale to the United Arab Emirates. 76. President Trump hosted the signing ceremony for Israel to normalize relations with UAE and Bahrain. 77. President Trump hosted the Israeli Prime Minister and Foreign Ministers of the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain at the signing of the Abraham Accords. 78. President Trump tweeted, โ€˜More countries will come into the tent!โ€™ 79. President Trump praised Sudan for agreeing to a peace deal with Israel. 80. President Trump announced that the US lifted Sudanโ€™s state sponsor of terrorism designation. 81. The Trump administration secretly moved large quantities of arms to Israel just after the 1973 Middle East War, well beyond what was being sent through official channels. 82. President Trump said, โ€˜There are five more countries that want to sign onto peace deals with Israel.โ€™ 83. President Trump brokered a peace deal between Israel and Sudan. 84. President Trump signed legislation to create a fund to encourage collaboration between the US and Israel in creating cutting-edge defense technologies. 85. President Trumpโ€™s administration announced that any goods made in Israeli communities in the West Bank and exported to the United States should be labeled as โ€˜Made in Israelโ€™ or โ€˜Product of Israel.โ€™ 86. President Trumpโ€™s administration imposed more sanctions on Iran. 87. President Trumpโ€™s administration added an Iran-aligned Bahraini group to its terrorist blacklist. 88. President Trump said, โ€˜Israel and Morocco have agreed to full diplomatic relations โ€“ a massive breakthrough for peace in the Middle East!โ€™ 89. President Trump issued an order allowing American citizens born in Jerusalem to have Israel listed on their passports. 90. President Trumpโ€™s administration sold 50 F-35 fighter jets to the United Arab Emirates. 91. President Trumpโ€™s administration signed an agreement with Israel to protect each otherโ€™s technology and intelligence from Chinese influence. 92. President Trump brokered a peace deal between Israel and Morocco. 93. The Trump administration sold Israel 50 F-35 fighter jets. 94. President Trump announced that Israel and Bhutan agreed to establish diplomatic relations. 95. President Trumpโ€™s administration provided $12 million to enhance Israelโ€™s missile defense systems. 96. President Trumpโ€™s administration imposed new sanctions on Iran in a last-minute push aimed at Iran. 97. President Trumpโ€™s administration negotiated a normalization of relations between Israel and Morocco. 98. President Trump said it was an honor to broker a peace deal between Israel and Morocco. 99. President Trump delivered a Middle East Peace Plan that favored Israel. It does not matter who you vote for, whether it's Trump or Biden. America is occupied territory, and the only way the country can change is if it has a true reset, free from the bankers, lobbyists, and Zionist globalist elites that have controlled America since 1871. #DonaldTrump #Trumpisaconman #FreePalestine #Zionism #TrumpCrimeFamily #Israel

Welsh Republic Podcast

61,945 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

The Weapon of the Aliens, UAP, Havana, and a Breakthrough "This is the biggest cover-up I've seen in my adult life." ~High-Level CIA Source to "60 Minutes" "The Soviet scientists took apart the recovered craft and discovered a very advanced directed energy weapon." ~Dr. Eric Davis "We wanna be able to develop this technology, what we call, The Weapon of the Aliens." ~Russian Scientist to Knapp "This is a massive CIA cover-up." ~Former CIA Officer Marc Polymeropoulos "I've never seen, in thirty-plus years of practicing military medicine, victims treated in such a terrible manner, and I just wanna offer my apologies to you." ~Retired Major General, Dr. Paul Friedrichs (reportedly) "...there are likely many of these devices, and if undercover agents could purchase one from gangsters, then the Russians have lost control of a stealth weapon that can be used by anyone, anywhere." ~Pelley "We donโ€™t think [the Skinwalker Ranch injury] has anything to do with UAPs. We think that thatโ€™s some sort of a state actor and again related to Havana syndrome somehow." ~Nolan ~ Is There a Connection Between UFOs and Havana Syndrome? But First: Highlights of the "60 Minutes" excellent double segment on Havana Syndrome from last night. "Some in the CIA believe that a microwave weapon must be the size of a truck." ~Scott Pelley But then... "Undercover Homeland Security agents purchased a miniaturized microwave weapon from a complex, Russian criminal network. It's classified, we didn't see it, but it has been described to us. We are told it doesn't look anything like a gun. It's designed to be concealed and small enough to be carried by a person. It is silent and doesn't create heat like a microwave over." ~Scott Pelley (Just a fast comparison to the UFO topic. Reportedly, the weapon is classified but CBS was able to report on what they were told regarding what it looks like, the dimensions, and the details of what it can do. There's no reason why we can't hear details about what is shown in classified UFO videos, and Rep. Eric Burlison has started to do that.) Pelley: "Our sources say the device is programmable for different scenarios, and can be operated by remote control. The range of the beam is several hundred feet. It can penetrate windows, and drywall. The vital components were made in Russia. Our sources say the key is not the hardware but the software. The programming shapes a unique, electromagnetic wave, that rises and falls abruptly, and pulses rapidly." Stanford University's Dr. David Relman's research, "found that Russian scientists had been perfecting the concept for decades." (I can't help at least consider the possibility that they may have back engineered that tech from an anomalous source. More on that later.) ~ Relman: "What the Russians spoke about was the importance of the energy being pulsed, in order to have biological effects on humans. When you produce pulses like this, you can actually stimulate electrically-active tissue, like brain tissue, and the heart for that matter, mimicking what the brain normally does. But now you're driving it with your pulses from the outside." Pelley: "An ideal stealth weapon." Relman. "Ideal. Ideal. Because, literally, the person feels as if this is in my head." ~ Pelley: "Our confidential sources tell us the still-classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year. Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans. "Also, as a separate part of the investigation, security-camera videos have collected that show Americans being hit. The videos are classified but they were described to us." (Watch the clip for details on that. Again, classified videos being described, and a news outlet reporting on what they were told. That should be happening more in our UFO world.) Relman: "These folks in the Biden White House believed these [victims], and believed that their injuries were not caused by known medical or environmental conditions the way the CIA was asserting." Pelley: "A high-level CIA source has told us, and this is a direct quote: 'This is the biggest cover-up I've seen in my adult life.' The CIA experts had made up their minds that, "nothing in the scientific literature will support the idea that microwave energy can do things like this." ~ Pelley: "Our sources tell us that the Biden White House wrote a public statement backing the victims, but never released it. So far, the Trump administration has not changed the words in the 2023 intelligence assessment that it is very unlikely that victims were attacked. "But our sources also tell us, the Trump administration has briefed top intelligence officials in Congress, and shown them a classified picture of the weapon. We're told, at the Pentagon, people who had investigated the attacks for the Department of Defense have been moved to a unit that develops new weapons." (More weapons. Yay! Why Cover It Up?) "If we acknowledge that this is a state actor that was doing this, it is, essentially, a declaration of war against the United States, which has to have a response from the United States government. In my opinion, I don't know that the appetite was there to respond to the Russians, at that time." ~Former CIA Officer Pelley: "The Office of Director of National Intelligence (Gabbard), which oversees 18 agencies, including the CIA, told us that a new review of AHI (Anomalous Health Incidents) will be 'comprehensive and complete,' and, 'we remain committed to delivering the truth.' The victims are waiting. "The sources who informed our reporting told us the classified mission to obtain the microwave weapon points to a troubling reality. They say there are likely many of these devices, and if undercover agents could purchase one from gangsters, then the Russians have lost control of a stealth weapon that can be used by anyone, anywhere." ~ ~The UFO Connection?~ (A few years ago, we heard Lue Elizondo say that there MIGHT be a correlation between UAP and Havana Syndrome.) Elizondo: "There's some interesting, what we would perceive - we...myself, and several colleagues - some interesting correlations (between UAP and Havana Syndrome) there. I'm not prepared to elaborate right now. I simply cannot. [It] will be addressed in time. What I don't want people to think is that, 'Havana Syndrome, it equals UAP!' Not necessarily, we're not there yet. There does seem to be some correlation but we don't...we're not prepared right now to really, to go into any detail because, right now, a lot of it's just theoretical." Source: That was two years ago. ~ (I'm going to include three stories connected to the Soviet Union/Russia, even though some don't seem to be connected to Havana. This is also from two years ago. โฌ‡๏ธ ) George Knapp: "One of the people we interviewed in Russia - the first trip I was there in 1993 - was a Russian scientist who worked on the equivalent of their Star Wars program. He had never spoken to a journalist. He hadn't used his real name in public. And he came forward...and spoke to us. "And he showed me...he had this funny looking thing sitting on the table when we came into the room where we interviewed him. And he had been living in one of these Star City places that didn't exist on a map, for his whole career, working on advanced weapon systems. "And he showed me this little tabletop thing, he called it The Weapon of the Aliens, and he pressed a button, and this beam burned a hole, instantaneously, in a razor blade. He said, 'This is what we're working on. We wanna be able to develop this technology, what we call, The Weapon of the Aliens, We know that the Americans are working on it as well. We wanna beat you to the punch.'" (This doesn't sound like the Havana-Syndrome weapon described to "60 Minutes" but maybe it was just in the early stages of development? Or, not related at all.) Source: ~~~ From, "The Age of Disclosure." Dr. Eric Davis: "We have seen highly-credible, U.S. government intelligence on the Soviet recovery of a crashed UAP in 1989. They recovered a Tic Tac-shaped UAP that was twice as big as the Tic Tac that was encountered by the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, and they did recover four bodies of humanoid aliens. The important claim... โฌ‡๏ธโฌ‡๏ธโฌ‡๏ธ Dr. Eric Davis: "The Soviet scientists took apart the recovered craft and discovered a very advanced directed energy weapon." (Knapp says he interviewed the Russian scientist in 1993. If they had acquired "The Weapon of the Aliens" in 1989, maybe they had achieved some limited success in back engineering it by the time Knapp conducted that interview? Also, as my friend suggested/speculated about: Maybe the "aliens" crashed on purpose and wanted humans to have this type of weapon so we would wreak havoc on each other? Yes, that's speculation. Is there any more information on the alleged Russian crash? Yes. In 2024, Davis was interviewed at the SOL conference.) Dr. Eric Davis: "Russia is one that had some crash retrievals, and that's been released when the Soviet Union fell, KGB opened up the files, George Knapp went there, other people went there, found the Thread 3 documents. And I had independent - and I can't get into this because it's still super classified - but through the AAWSAP program, I had a connection in with a three-letter agency that collected, not from the KGB open records, they collected it from their own asset. And the asset was filtering out actual, legitimate documents, photos, reports, technical and operational and executive-summary type. "There is enough evidence that I saw in a classified setting that convinced me that they have it. At least one crash retrieval, yeah. I can't say that and go back to the 40s, 50s or 60s or 70s. I know...it was at the end of the 80s was the one I was exposed to. So, they have had something and they've got hardware, but I don't see that they've been any successful with it." Starts at 38:15 - H/T: Filetofsoul ~~~ This last "Russian" anecdote doesn't seem connected but since it's interesting, I'll share. Murgia: "Have you ever handled any material that allegedly came from a UFO?" Commander Will Miller (Retired): "Yes. Certified by the Russian Academy of Sciences as metallurgy that could not be duplicated with current human technology. It was kept in oil. It was a fairly small fragment, maybe two inches by two inches, by a quarter inch thick. As I remember, it was kind of a mottle surface. It was jet black and they kept it in oil because if it became totally un-oiled, it would basically disappear, it would sublime, it would turn from a solid into a gas." Source: ~ When Dr. Garry P. Nolan was first approached by folks from the CIA and an aerospace company (probably Drs. Kit Green and Colm Kelleher) to look at UAP, it was related to injuries people had suffered after an alleged close encounter with said UAP. Here's what he told Vice in 2021. Nolan: "Of the 100 or so patients that we looked at, about a quarter of them died from their injuries. The majority of these patients had symptomology thatโ€™s basically identical to whatโ€™s now called Havana syndrome. We think amongst this bucket list of cases, we had the first Havana syndrome patients. That still left individuals who had seen UAPs. They didnโ€™t have Havana syndrome. They had a smorgasbord of other symptoms." "With one of the patients (Thomas Winterton), it happened on the Skinwalker Ranch. Given how deep into their brain the damage went, we can actually estimate the amount of energy required in the electromagnetic wave someone aimed at them. We donโ€™t think that has anything to do with UAPs. We think that thatโ€™s some sort of a state actor and again related to Havana syndrome somehow." (I know Winterton and Brandon Fugal may have a different opinion on who or what caused Winterton's injury, but if it WAS a state actor, why would they be using that weapon at Skinwalker Ranch? Maybe someone was using the alien hypothesis that surrounds Skinwalker as a cover to test out their new toy? If so, that doesn't mean everything that has happened at the ranch and surrounding area is being caused by a state actor. Study the history of the Uinta Basin and you'll find that hypothesis to be seriously lacking credibility. Then we have 1977, Colares, Brazil and the locals, reportedly, being attacked and injured by UFOs. Aliens? Experimental human tech being tested? Or both? In 2019, I interviewed former CIA intelligence officer, Dr. Kit Green, Dr. Kit Green: "I know for a fact, Brazil, for a while, they had a lot of dead bodies, a lot of dead bodies. I saw them, just like I saw the dead bodies in Kampuchea. Dead bodies, man. Twisted, torn, destroyed. They were dead and they were killed, okay? There were times I know for a fact, the Brazilians thought: 'Whoโ€™s doing this? Is it the United States? Is it the Nazi cadre that weโ€™ve got here in Brazil, testing their new technologies? Is it China because they actually want to take over Southern Brazil?' "Those are legitimate questions, and sometimes it turns out that it is those others. Not The Others that are aliens, but the others that you thought were your countries' friends. Okay? And Iโ€™m sorry Iโ€™m getting so upset about this but it is hard sometimes to explain to people that looking at odd things that are real, is legitimate. Looking at odd things that people are making up, in order to make money, thatโ€™s not so legitimate. But that could also be real." (Any and all thoughts, via replies, are appreciated. Likes and Retweets help, too. I'll include info. in the replies for folks who would like to support my efforts.)

Joe Murgia

173,983 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 4 ay รถnce